The only thing that I am sure of is that I have a very limited amount of time in this beautiful world of ours, I am (at the moment) blessed with good health and free will, and my job as a human being is to figure out what is true for me. Whether I become Christian, Buddhist, atheist, Satan worshiper, or just my own class of asshole jerkoff is on me and no ones business. Live your life how you want to live it and stop fucking with each other my friends!
I worship the sun, the earth, the female form and everything greater than me that I can see, touch, feel or otherwise experience. Call me pagan if you want, I'll call you an asshole because that is just a label. The problem here is that we each only care about convincing the others that our way is the truth. Stop wasting your lives on such petty bullshit and focus on the real meaning of life, which is to be happy and to love one another.
This video was extremely well done, but this isn't real science. We know that nature itself doesn't think and create. Nature is bound to its own laws. Its own laws prevent it from creating life. Therefore a supernatural explanation is the next logical jump.
@marigolds44 And where did the supernatural explanation come from? For what science doesn't know yet can't be covered by a deity. Diseases were thought to be caused by demons which are supernatural and yet we proved that they were caused by germs. We will find the answers. Covering what you don't know with a deity is not scientific at all.
In the scientific methods, we base our concepts on 'evidence'. If you can show evidence, then PoP (Proof of Principal) can be established. If you believe in a stance, without evidence backing it up, this is not of sound nature and is right up there with believing in ghosts and the spaghetti monster. Look at the evidence and where it points and you can see a different path than what Evolution teaches. Here's why in the next few posts... Remember that one must show PoP of self-originating code...
Show me the 'proof' (evidence) to any sort of "self-creating" code and you'll change my mind to the concept of Natural Origins. You must show me this simple procedure to make the claim of natural origins for without such evidence, all you have is a faith-based idea without any supporting evidence to the contrary... Show me the logic; how any mathematical procedure can self-create, such is needed in the concept of origins... Show me the logistics or admit that you 'believe' on faith alone.
We have evidence of synthetic biology ('creation') in the lab and 'design' (genetic engineering) in the lab but no evidence in the lab of natural origins. So if the possibility exists of design and creation, then the stance of natural origins must consider these evidence based positions as 'possibilities' of life and evolution by 'outside means' other than by natural means only. NeoDarwinians ‘ignore’ the evidence in favor of natural origins, which has no evidence or validating lab work...
In the concept of creating and manipulating 'code', the creator of such code can program code to replicate and even evolve but in the history of man, never has any evidence arisen that code, any sort of code, can naturally originate as in the concept of self creating itself especially self-create into intelligence as is the claim of Natural Origins, the cornerstone and basis of Evolution. If you think it's possible, produce the evidence to such to back your claim...
In the logistical stance of computer programming in codecs, the concept of 'self-creating' code is a fallacy that is known and accepted to be a false stance (no evidence and intelligently accepted as being false) For someone in the biological fields to state otherwise as in the stance of natural origins has no basis for such claim in which they use an un-proven stance as the cornerstone of life’s origins in which the ToE fails the scientific method.
Self-creating code, evolving into intelligence is a stance that has no evidence, which makes it a stance based on faith alone. Natural Origins is a 'faith' based cult in which, is the cornerstone and basis of the atheist "religion" we call Evolution. Evolution is not a true Theory when it's based on faith and consciously ignores supporting evidence to the contrary.
Code has never been shown to 'self-create'. There is no evidence in the history of humanity that code, any type of code as in RNA/DNA/Computer code can originate out of nothing... 0 + 0 = 0 is a true statement where Abiogenesis/Natural Origins takes this stand, 0 + 0 = 1 in which it is a false statement in the logic of codecs.
We have PoP of synthetic biology ('creation') in the lab and 'design' (genetic engineering) in the lab but no evidence in the lab of natural origins (NO evidence of self-creating code). So if the possibility exists of design and creation and Natural Origins has no evidence, then think about 'where' the evidence actually points...
Hear what God of Israel YAHUSHUA-YAHUWAH (Son and Father are ONE) saying to our generation by His chosen prophets: Trumpetcallofgodonline. com ; Letter called "Purify Your Faith, and Come to the Father as It is Written": EXCERPT: "Only in the Bible and through these very Letters, of which I have given to My prophet of the end of this age, shall you find Him and know Him."
This video is a scientific embarrassment. Good thing they used computer animation so that they could invent evidence—just like any other Victorian Era Darwinian tall tale.
@Alphacaliber I see that you have no substantive response and so you rely on school yard taunts. Simply work on developing the discernment skills to parse between fact and gap filler and you will readily discern the scientific language that is used to mask the atheist propaganda.
unsatisfying clip!! before u start with dna and cellwalls you should first explain how the first nucleotides formed RNA and how rybozymes where able to perform kathalytic reaction etc...there are many steps before a complete dna molecule that replicates itself!!!
@phatburger100. Have you ever heard of the Apocrypha? Furthermore, the Council of Nicea 325 AD? The bible has NOT been changed???? Are you insane??? Just take a look at the many version there are today! Psycho Creationist.
First 20 seconds and i know this is wrong. "...There is no oxygen in th air. Molten lava is...." Molten Lava!?! If there is no Oxygen how can combustion be supported!
Molten lava doesn't come from *burning* rock, it comes from *melting* rock. Heat. Not combustion. You should really learn some science before attempting to criticize it.
@leatherneck2044 And your horseshit belief system of a space daddy that created everything isn't fantasy? You're pathologically delusional my friend. At least the Science has sufficient amounts evidence for Evolution and Human Evolution specifically, as opposed to parthenogenesis among human beings and people raising from the dead, oh and a man being swallowed by a "big fish", yet surviving the incident to tell it all. The most important question here is, How is your Science Literacy?
@michel5891 Evolution is a lie. Its pure fantasy. i have studied it for hours. All of it is made up stories except true natural selection. Then you come with your trite arguments about space daddys. Nature can't produce life, fact. Law of biogenesis, so evlution is not correct. Science proved it wrong. You are a science illeterate. You think dead matter becomes life. It never has never will. logically God is beyond nature itself. The laws of nature can't account for life. Think about it
i dont know why anyone should be anything the other says.just believe whatever that you want to believe.at the end if god exists,atheists are screwed, however who believe in god will get what they have worked for. but if god doesnt exist,atheists would not get anything nor lose anything, its just that they were right, and believers.well you have missed to try forbidden things, depending on your religion. As I see it, the only losers are atheists :) Ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure ;)
Young skulls full of mush go to college and get indoctrinated into the bullshit of evolution. They remain emotionally-stunted but their ego grows large and convinces them they are smart. Thus, in their immaturity, they assume that anyone who doesn't agree with the propaganda they believe is "dumb."
Young skulls full of mush go to church and get indoctrinated into the bullshit of religion. They remain emotionally and educationally stunted but their delusion grows large and convinces them they are correct. Thus, in their immaturity and inability to think freely, they assume that anyone who doesn't agree with the propaganda they believe is "doomed."
o.O I don't get how people can believe that creation of the universe can be explained by god when it really just poses more questions about the creation of god...
Hey, kiddos, want to see a fairy tale that adults really believe? Google whale evolution and go watch a 7 minutes video on the PBS web site that shows how an ancient 200 pound wolf searched for food along the beach, wander out into the surf, and morphed (evolved) into a 100 ton whale. There is nothing scientific about it, but nonetheless, this is the fairy tale that some adults really believe! Especially comical are the nostrils migrating to the top of the head to become a blow hole!
@achilles197474 Everytime a creationist opens his or her mouth, they broadcast to the world their total ignorance of how evolution through natural selection actually works.
It's really good for them that everyone on here operates under a pseudonym. It'd be embarrassing for them, for their friends and neighbours to find out who was spouting this mindless gibberish.
Thunderf00t ends some of his videos:
"Why do people laugh at creationists? Only creationists don't know why."
Listen to all the people who think humans should believe in god and should not do research on what is what and how is how of everything in the universe and on the planet , Then GO LIVE IN CAVE , the internet your on came from the same scientific research like this one
how about specialized "because" different culturing; instead of for? were not delusional sociopaths... that is preposterous not humble and investigative.
Where is the record of all theses so called life forms that "evolved"? There should be a rich fossil record (even of microscopic life)...there isn't. Science claiming that the universe came from "nothing" and then saying that life "evolved" on earth without a record of its linear path of life (fossils) shows me that their "theories" are bordering on the rediculous. The sad thing is, the gulible look at this propaganda and consider it true.
@bheadh evolutionists just watch things like this to make them feel better. Creation is so much more logical. and the debates always end with christians are a bunch of stupid heads, im really kind of tired of it, its almost not worth debating. everything in life degrades in time not one thing improves with time, yet you put a million years at the end of everything you get something better. no logic. the obvious truth is there back by obvious reason and logic. yet they refuse to see.
Respond to this video... buts its all good, all it does prove the word of God true some more. "proffessing to wise they became fools in their understanding" it goes something like that lol. you see it in these people. they compromise basic critical thinking and reasoning skills just to hold on to something where the odds are 1:10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000. No competent human being would bet there their last french fry at those odds. RECOGNIZE THE DESIGN
@gotthepanzershreck I have been around the block a few times to recognize that I am limited. I don't have all the answers. God says (through the bible) "He who says there is no God is a fool"....and "They certainly had knoweledge of God, yet they did not glorify him as God and give him thanks; they stultified themselves through SPECULATING TO NO PURPOSE and their senseless hearts were darkened". This simple Quote has modern day "science" pegged. They sit there and "theorize" way to unexplain God
@bheadh Uhh, we don't try to find ways to DISPROVE god, we try to find out what makes more SENSE. One being has been alive forEVER and ever and ever and ever and he created everything! we all have souls, when we die we're going to join this being and float around in peace and joy for the rest of forever. -blank stare- you think that didn't cause someone, one day, to be like "now wait a minute......that doesn't make a bit of sense."
@XmisszombitchX What man fails to realize is: Man is limited. He doesn't have all the answers (although with people like R. Dawkins, he thinks HE does.) I disagree with you about the explainations "science" makes about the "big-bang", make sense. Man can only see a very tiny part of creation. Yet he seems to think that he has all the answers to how it started and why it's here. Consider, Nothing can come from nothing. Something (the universe) can come about if Something (God) always existed.
@bheadh your calling the big bang wrong ? you are really calling it wrong ?? or just a theory . Wow , Incredible , There is so much proof for it , and not just little , The proof is everywhere , Its prove is so much strong that almost 100 % of the science community strictly believes in it . If you have no knowledge about anything , Why do you bothering mentioning it ?? Why ? Go read a book
Dawkins won't debate with creationists who are scientists, such as the scientists at ICR, The Institure for Creation Research. Ask him why? Read my Internet article: ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. This article will also explain the scientific impossibility of life evolving into existence.
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible in nature (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). Besides, species couldn't have survived with vital tissues, organs, biological systems still evolving? I discuss Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA." Read Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
This is the conventional model for explaining the origin of life on the earth, from a primordial soup, due to lightning, the sun, and gases. But the new discoveries show that CHEMOsynthesis is the process that gave rise to life on earth. The old text books are to be used no more to explain how life originated on earth. All Christians and other Religious idiots STFU and read a fuckin book other than the bullshit you call a bible!
Reading the prior dialogues convinces me we evolved from slime mold- we insult primates. Why don't the fanatics jump off a building to prove gravity doesn't exist?
4 billion years ago? I guess this guy doesn't know that the Earth is 6,000 years old.The Earth looks old because the stuff with which God created the Earth is billions of years old. Sorry, but there is a god to whom we're all responsible. If this guy knows exactly how all this stuff happened, then he should be able to produce a cell in a lab, but he can't.
@PulpPractical lol lol lol , wtf are you talkin about ? the god put dinosars fossils there to decorate earth ? to look older ? or adam & eve hanged with t-rexes ?
and what stupid relativization is that about the cell ?
creationists: instead of always criticizing evolution, how about giving us some concrete proof for creationism? (btw Bible doesn't count as solid evidence, since we all know it could very well have been altered throughout centuries. it is at best only a 'suggestive' evidence)
@Casshyr 107,597,707,791 have been estimated to live on the earth since the year 1 A.D. Let's say only 10% (extremely low figure) Knew about the bible. Not ONE person out of 10,759,770,779 wrote that ANYTHING in the bible was changed. Its just logical the bible hasn't been changed. And there is plenty of evidence that disproves evolution/darwinism.
@phatburger100 "107,597,707,791 have been estimated to live on the earth since the year 1 A.D" => LOL r u kidding me? That's 107 billions dude. Are you sure you copied your source right?
@phatburger100 "And there is plenty of evidence that disproves evolution/darwinism. " => you mean evidence propose by creationists like Kent Hovind, who can't somehow publish his argument into peer-review scientific journals? Here's something you should know about science: if it's not in peer-reviewed journals, it's not scientific evidence. This goes for both atheist and theist. I don't simply read what's on atheist website and trust it. I trust peer-reviewed papers.
But um interested in comparison of religions too. For me, Judaism, Christianity & Islam are no more than Windows XP then Vista then Windows 7 respectively ... all upgraded versions of the same essence, typical in calling to believe in Abraham's God ... All claim having divine books, moreover; it’s known historically that Abraham is the biological great grandfather of Moses, Jesus & Muhammad making them basically members of one dynasty.
@extra222love Judaism is a redaction of Zoroastrianism,Buddhism and Hinduism.Christianity is nothing but Reformist Judaism,based on Rabbi Hilels` teaching that the whole of Torah is summed up as "love thy neighbor as thyself' or 'the golden rule'.Quran and Islam are a redaction and plagiarism of Tanach/Gospels. Compare the story of Muhammad and Bahira it is exactly that of KingDavid in 1Samuel 16:1-16,also Aminahs visitation is copied from Luke1:26-38 plus many plagiarized verses from Tanach.
Yes indeed ... If you read about any religion with a preconceived idea of NO Creator to this universe & life then they'll turn to no more than Ethics/ideologies.
But if you read with a Creator existence undoubted in mind then you'll start tasting it differently, not only that, but you'll realize which one is really a divine and which are only manmade corruptions in order to gain power and pull money out of donors pockets.
That's why I prefer to stick around the Creator first!
@extra222love Not all religions are mono-theistic. Zoroastrianism,of which Judaism is a redaction of was the 1st to espouse the mono-theistic tradition worshipping Mazda as the supreme authority,Judaism is a redaction of Buddhism,Hinduism and Zoroastrianism. Again your ignoring science and starting with a conclusion ,that there is "a creator existence undoubted in mind" 1st,this is inimical to reason as it exists only in your mind. Your logic is mainly just sophistry disguised as philosophy
I was raised in an atheist family ... but I believe now in "God the Creator" whatever other name he has as long as he is the one created this universe & pumped the life at the first cell 4 billion years ago then programmed it with the evolution which took care downstream!
Name him whatever you like: Allah, Father, Elohim, YHWH, Krishna or Brahma, X, Y or Z, I don't care!
But this world can't be a product of randomness; some supernatural entity must have created this universe & life.
@extra222love 'some supernatural entity MUST have created..." This idea is nothing but a phenomenal appearance in the sensibility of yourself as a subject and a manner of species of representation passed from generation to generation.Read Hegels` 'ThePhenomenologyOfSpirit' it explains why we feel the need as humans to believe in something bigger than ourselves,its purely human physchological phenomena nothing more.
"ThePhenomenologyOfSpirit" it explains why we feel the need as humans to believe in something bigger than ourselves", Thank you, but don't you think it's better to explain how LIFE existed? ... Or specifically ... how the first Prokaryotic Cell 4Ga got a complex structure and ultimately life? Beyond any reason of doubt ... don't waste your time explaining what happened before or after that moment ... It's all well known.
If you can't (which um sure of), then I suggest u think twice!
@extra222love I know the grand questions of specualtive metaphysics have not been answered,these questions of origin of cosmos and life are most likely unknowable and will remain so until the sun explodes..but thats not a good reason to attribute evrything unknowable to the supernatural,after all much of what humans attributed to the supernatural in history was proven by science to be perfectly natural and explainable,so theres not even a history of anything supernatural EVER existing.
@extra222love Its funny how bigoted you are, insisting your belief in the 'unknowable' is more accurate than my belief in the simple facts. Just goes to show the arrogance of theists. Its the definition of ignorance for you to insist your belief in the unknowable is more accurate than my belief in what we know to be facts. Its laughable how u said 'were talkin science here not poems' and then ignored ur own dialectic for the rest of our debate. Ur a hypocrite and a bigot, 2 fer 2.
U saying "Ur a hypocrite and a bigot", just reminds me with the medieval church throwing negative attributes on whoever not in line with their beliefs, take a note, buddy!
And assuming that Iron, seats, steering wheel, spark plugs, engines and wheels ... just got the successful conditions to get together then ... BANG! ... Cars are running in HighWay 5, California! "CASE CLOSED" is good definition of what you're calling us to believe.
@extra222love ...more sophistry.These grand questions of origin are unknown are probably unknowable and will remain so. No man who has ever walked the Earth has known the origin of the cosmos or life and any man that says he does is a liar.FACT That is the greatest truth you can understand in this life,that and that death is a certainty. that is the only truth. Yet you want to sacrifice this truth for the power of claiming to know the unknowable. "sacrifice the truth to power" we went thru this
"your belief in the unknowable is more accurate than my belief in what we know to be facts"
Are we debating Newton's Third Law of Motion here? Or even Evolution? ... Duh
We're discussing the most crucial challenge unanswered by science which is how the relatively simple organic building blocks polymerise and form more complex structures, interacting in consistent ways to form a protocell 4Ga.
I wonder who authorized you to announce "we know to be facts"
@extra222love Your idea of a creator ,(while your in your scientific mode again lol,) is just an hypotheses,and an untested one at that.(How can you test the supernatural ??) You suffer from "Post coitum omne animal tristis est". Its perfectly natural phenomena so dont feel bad but get over it already. "The whole problem with the world is that fools and religious fanatics are so sure of themselves but wiser people are full of doubt." BertrandRussell....and rightfully so.
In fact, the Protocell Project is all about disproving the need to "the Creator" by proving the existence of any "natural" process ends up with a living reproducing cell.
Hans Ziock [with his appreciated 3 yrs efforts] isn't the first trial to produce life in lab; Russian scientists went through a painful 15 yrs similar project ended up with some dead organic sh@t under the microscope.
Hans said he needs one more year to come up with something! So let's wait & see.
@extra222love read Kants` "CritiqueOfPureReason" it will teach you to think more empirically and analytically and abandon your whims of the supernatural. With the profusion of religions the 'search for god' has become the biggest wild goose chase in mans` history. We will look back on history in the future at religion and our use of it as a time of dogmatic ignorance and error ,just like all other chimerical ideas have been proven wrong by science eventually monotheism will die as well.
@extra222love "Creator is a MUST"..the way b4 we understood precipitation a 'rain creator' was a MUST? Dont dismiss Kant ,reason is not simply a rational or cerebral activity but an intuitive grasp of the eternal reality within and without us. And now to the inevitable ?,if a creator created ALL then who created the creator? Ah I bet you insist the universe cannot be a self-existing matrix but the creator definitely MUST be self-existing,totally unknowable Im betting u know tho answer tho,lol.
@extra222love your funny... a complete bigot with little or no empirical facultites but still funny. I guess you have to be a bigot to be religious in 2011 ,the information age. Think about the evolution of the solar system,Earth and biological life,billions of years it was ,all so the Pope can tell us wether or not to wear condoms,,,,this is reasonable to you?? lmao
[This Pope condoms "thing" made me burst in laughter! lol]
OK, let’s put it straight; I might agree w/you scientific facts had killed the fake Gods.
But it’s only the Creator who is supported by Logic & Cause/Effect.
The fact that all of us evolved from a single cell existed 4Ga, puts all of us equal in front of the Creator, no matter the color or race, so if you find a religion which puts a man on a higher rank or being a giver of God's mercy, then it's FAKE! & CORRUPT! Full stop
@extra222love hypocrisy ,bigotry,abandoning reason and sacrificing the truth all for the power of believing you know the unknowable and I guess so you can sleep at night knowing you are under the watchful gaze of an omni-present patriarchial god-king who has only your morality on his mind . Sounds like a lack of integrity to me and lack of courage or laziness to do your own metaphysical inventory and come up with your own philosophy.Spirituality comes from within not (religious) books.
"Spirituality comes from within not (religious) books" ... I do agree ... and I guess I was practicing this since the beginning of our lovely conversation. Did I mention any "claimed to be a" holy book? Nope ... It's all derivation from pure logic.
It's obvious you're still jailed within ideologies of medieval church [even u look against it], Thus, I invite you to free yourself from such historical crap, Remember, If cars were misused, it doesn't mean they're bad but the misuse!
@extra222love your philosophy is the same as the reformist Judaism called Christianity based on Rabbi Hilels 'GoldenRule' . God just wants us to be nice and luv thy neighbor,lol. Not only is the existence of a creator unknowable but you are claiming you also know what he wants,lol. This is bigotry of the highest order and you my friend have a bigoted and hypocritical philosophy just like ALL the monotheistic religions. Insisting you know whats on the creators mind is the werst kind of bigotry
The Creator "being the ultimate power" does NOT need us to worship him, didn't create us to travel a journey of guilt with a stick "on his hands" threatening to be burned. All such sadistic images are no more than a production of the sick corrupt religious people.
Do u know what does the Creator want from us? VERY SIMPLE, Just take care of what he created. Don't (kill, rape, steal, lie, betray, etc.) but (Help, support, etc.)
LIFE CREATOR is the one who made LIFE after NO LIFE.
So, suggesting Creator (1) created the Creator (2) who created life, automatically eliminates Creator (2) to claim being the dividing line between LIFE and NO LIFE because he was already given LIFE by creator (1).
So basically, any CREATED entity cannot stand as the "Life Creator"
It's always the privilege of the first one “God the Creator”
Who created the Creator? is no more than a straw man fallacy.
@extra222love hypocrisy,insisting sumthing complex like universe MUST have been created but in the same breath denying that a MORE complex being like a supernatural-god king needs a creator and any other notion is "straw man fallacy" ?,lol. No logic whatsoever in your philosophy. Strange evolution when people have come to believe ,thru religion,that they are the universes` greatest collusion ,when really were just a collection of cells,over-rating themselves "hello god?" and avoiding the truth.
@extra222love Although there are still scientific debates about what actually happened on the early Earth, Abiogenesis, as defined as life coming from non-life, has been achieved. I quote Eckard Wimmer's group who synththesyzed an RNA virus, the recent work of Craig Ventor who created Mycoplasma laboratorium from non-living components, and , of course, the wonderful pioneering work of Dr. Frankinstein.
Thank you for the comment, however, the following must be straightened out in order not to confuse readers with what really was produced in Lab:
1- Eckard Wimmer, who led the study, denies that he has created life.
"No, I would not say I created life in a test tube," Wimmer said in a telephone interview. "We created a chemical in a test tube that, when put into cells, begins to behave a little bit like something alive. Some people say viruses are chemicals and I belong to that group"
@extra222love It was actually a joke about Frankenstein, but never mind. Wimmer's chemical's behaving like something alive, and something alive is a distinction without a difference I think, but I wouldn't claim a virus as an independant life form. Craig Ventor's raw materials were not alive, and then they were. Although he did not simulate the processes that occured on early Earth, he did, strictly speaking, animate dead material, abiogenesis.
2- Craig Ventor was the first to successfully create what was described as "synthetic life." This was done by synthesizing a very long DNA molecule containing an entire bacterium genome, and introducing this into another cell, analogous to the accomplishment of Eckard Wimmer's group!
3- Let's wait for Dr. Hans Ziok's "Protocell Project", he needs one more year!
4- No body created a "REAL LIFE" in lab so far.
5- Until then, Abiogenesis will remain no more than unproven Sci-Fi dreams!
The Cause/Effect principle mandates an Xternal force with "prior knowledge" to build the Protocell just like when Ether was logically mandated to xplain how light waves could travel in the empty space.
Hence, the unlucky Ether got the blowing hit once Special Theory of Relativity proved that Light photons do have MASS characteristics rendering "him" useless.
Similarly, if Life gets produced in Lab only then the concept of the Creator will become useless!
@extra222love "the concept of a creator will become useless." ."Religion is mans` favorite toy and will remain so as long as he is afraid of death."Kant "Humans cannot endure emptiness and desolation,they will fill the vacuum by creating a new focus of meaning." Hegel. When we didnt understand precipitation we created the 'rain god',for thunder we created Thor etc. etc. as long as we dont understand it humans will invent something to fill the void. Which is why you create god in your mind.
At 00:16 "Hard to imagine but this harsh environment was perfect for nurturing a miracle"
and At 00:29 "And somehow, when the smoke cleared there was something new! Something amazing, a very very special molecule with a graceful spiral shape"
It looks that scientists studied in Disney World, or brainwashed by Universal Studios.
I can't swallow what happened at this moment without the effect of an external force usually referred to as the Creator to pick the favorable process.
@extra222love because science cant answer evry last detail %100 by providing evry scrap of evidence needed you MUST believe in a supernatural god-king by default of which there is absolutely zero evidence?? Your statement sounds completely crazy to me. Because sciencve only supplies %95 of evidence you MUST by default believe in sumthing which supplies %0 of evidence,lol. Have a coffee
4- complex organic polymers and ultimately life were developed.
And it's around the last two points of the theory that much of the debate now centers, were all evidences suggest the opposite, since nature prefers to disintegrate Polymers back to Monomers, and dismentle RNA not to build it!
@extra222love yea Im not talking about theories ,Im into demonstrable fact backed up by empirical evidence.BigBang is a Theory not fact.The only thing we know for sure is the Universe is a self-existing matrix,4dimensions,3spatial,1temporal,they are incontrovertible and cannot be altered even by ones own movement and governed by the GravitationalConstant.So theres no supernatural god-king or miracles and even if we dont know how life started that doesnt mean it occurred supernaturally.
BigBang Theory got the majority consensus of the scientific elite, Yes, 4 dim's but the latest M-Theory (the merge of the 5 parent Superstrings Theory) proved the existence of 11 dim's worlds.
To name the universe as self-existing is a terrible error b/c it's against the conservation laws of Mass, Energy & Momentum! It should have an origin!
It’s UNKNOWN from where the Mass of the Universe came from, and the expanding Energy as well?
@extra222love Primordial soup has little evidence,BlackHoles function is posited to be that of spatial/temporal displacement,and I believe their function plays a more important part in the Uni. than we know. Aliens/AstronautFart ?You mean 'Panspermia'? Panspermia doesnt explain the existence of matter,only biological life. DnA via comets is already shown to be quite possible but still doesnt explain the existence of the matter that makes up bio-life.These theories have sum evidence,god has zero
@extra222love "The grand questions of speculative metaphysics cannot be answered by science yet but the sciences are firmly grounded in the laws of the human mind." The idea of a supernatural god-king is only a phenomenal appearance in the sensibility of yourself as a subject and a manner of species of representation.Evolution is occuring b4 our eyes as Atheism rises,its the emancipation of the human conciousness from a state of dogmatic ignorance and error.
Nature flows water from Top to Bottom, so in order to resist nature we need an external force by a PUMP.
Nature flows heat from Hot to Cold, so in order to resist nature we need an external force by an Air-Con.
Nature dismantles RNA to Polymers then disintegrates to Monomers, so in order to resist nature we need an external force by a Builder/Creator to successfully build the first protocell w/RNA 4Ga.
@extra222love very good ,"were talking science here" now obey your own stated dialectic. There is no empirical evidence,not even building block #1 of evidence for the creation theory.Science requires empirical evidence to reach a conclusion,so stop your sophistry,claiming to obey the laws of scientific analysis and in the same breath totally abadoning them.lol. Your being a bigot and a hypocrite in one statement. Belief in god is inimical to science and reason.Have a coffe pal.
@extra222love "The question is not to prove him?" There you go again,in one statement you say "were talking science here" now its " the questiion is not to prove him"..you are being bigoted and hypocritical again.Know this-"Asked if an object can have certain properties prior to the experience of that object? No.All objects of which the mind can think must conform to its manner of thought." You cant give evidence or prove the existence of a god which exists only in your mind.Stop your sophistry
@extra222love Ive read BookOfTao,Confucious,I Ching,Tanach and Talmud,Gospels,Quran and many Hadiths and studied Buddhism,Zoroastrianism and Hinduism as well. Evry one is a redaction of the other and all are just mans` early attempts to introduce Ethics/Orthodoxy to its savage diety worshipping population.Nothing more nothing less.Theres more science in an undergraduate biology text,more morality in a GeorgeEliot novel,more philosophy from Aristotle alone, than in all of them put together
@extra222love actually there is no evidence for Panspermia,however that doesnt preclude the existence of Alien life,to say there is no Alien life is very naive considering how much of the universe we have knowledge of.It would be like taking a drinking glass to the oceans edge,scooping up a glassful of ocean and declaring,"Nope! No whales in here!" But still believing in Panspermis doesnt require the leap to belief in the supernatural so its def. more plausible and even more lucid IMO
@extra222love and thats exactly what it would be a ride in circles. You believe in the supernatural so it is impossible to maintain a dialectic with you or any creationist.For truth you must search the facts and evidence and then come to a conclusion/idea,as a creationist/deist you are doing it backwards,starting with an conclusion/idea and then wrenching evidence to fit that conclusion/idea. Your ideology is inimical to reason and sacrifices the truth to power.
eukayra have helical DNA. Bacteria have sperical DNA. Nevertheless, DNA based life eveolved in the archean eon. The first live was not DNA based. Sponges have been show to be part of teh lineage of tnephores and cnidarians.
@aJerseyThing You were right the first time. I AM an Atheist. Your the crazy retard doing mental gymnastics to believe that shit, along with your random accusations of me being Muslim. Your an IDIOT!!
@MetalxXxMayhem Hit the road towel head. Only someone with the name Metal Mayhem (muslim towel head retard that is a suicidal pyromaniac fuck) would choose such a name. Go blow up a Taliban building why don't you. Leave youtube out of it.
@jettrooper3rd If it is not too late for your project, I think Platyhelminthes is what you are looking for. If you search Platyhelminthes you may get some answers.
Evolution alone would NOT be capable for forming the MILLIONS of extremely diverse, unique varieties of life. For one thing- it would NOT be necessary; There are literally thousands of different kinds of fish- each extremely unique- especially in design, and colors. Tropical fish are so amazingly, and beautifully colored, and there are thousands of different kinds. The infinite variety of colors, shapes, and patterns of these thousands of fish are not necessary. ALL there needs to be for surv
@TheWayandWordofLife then its random or some powerful being has an interesting imagination or we a have a single purpose created by many different purposes together.
@TheWayandWordofLife Be quiet. You won't listen to the science... and you don't say anything supportable. This discussion is over. You're talking to air.
@TheWayandWordofLife: "Evolution alone would NOT be capable for forming the MILLIONS of extremely diverse, unique varieties of life." And why not? Argument from ignorance/incredulity is a fallacy - you don't know what the environmental pressures on fish might even be. "All there needs to be is surv[ival, I presume]." No, there's still - always - competition, and evolution tries out lots of pathways to locate niches. Study of the cichlids in lake populations shows the possibilities.
God created everything, everything did not create itself, intelligence did not come from none intelligence neither did logic and lofe come from an illogical and none living source. We can only know the truth when we use our brains, when we open our minds to other possibilities (not limited by materialism) from what we chose to believe. Truth they say is always more stranger than friction
The only thing that I am sure of is that I have a very limited amount of time in this beautiful world of ours, I am (at the moment) blessed with good health and free will, and my job as a human being is to figure out what is true for me. Whether I become Christian, Buddhist, atheist, Satan worshiper, or just my own class of asshole jerkoff is on me and no ones business. Live your life how you want to live it and stop fucking with each other my friends!
MrDfigueroa 2 weeks ago
I worship the sun, the earth, the female form and everything greater than me that I can see, touch, feel or otherwise experience. Call me pagan if you want, I'll call you an asshole because that is just a label. The problem here is that we each only care about convincing the others that our way is the truth. Stop wasting your lives on such petty bullshit and focus on the real meaning of life, which is to be happy and to love one another.
MrDfigueroa 2 weeks ago 2
@MrDfigueroa The meaning of life is to reproduce nothing else.
Ipowne3g 6 days ago in playlist Fler videoklipp från Best0fScience
ok so where did those gases and lightning and chemicals come from at the first place? just wondering!
haphazardful 2 weeks ago
This video was extremely well done, but this isn't real science. We know that nature itself doesn't think and create. Nature is bound to its own laws. Its own laws prevent it from creating life. Therefore a supernatural explanation is the next logical jump.
marigolds44 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
XxI3ioHazardxX 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@marigolds44 And where did the supernatural explanation come from? For what science doesn't know yet can't be covered by a deity. Diseases were thought to be caused by demons which are supernatural and yet we proved that they were caused by germs. We will find the answers. Covering what you don't know with a deity is not scientific at all.
XxI3ioHazardxX 2 weeks ago
The scientific method shows that evolution could not have happened.
marigolds44 2 weeks ago
In the scientific methods, we base our concepts on 'evidence'. If you can show evidence, then PoP (Proof of Principal) can be established. If you believe in a stance, without evidence backing it up, this is not of sound nature and is right up there with believing in ghosts and the spaghetti monster. Look at the evidence and where it points and you can see a different path than what Evolution teaches. Here's why in the next few posts... Remember that one must show PoP of self-originating code...
nooneeagle 4 weeks ago
Show me the 'proof' (evidence) to any sort of "self-creating" code and you'll change my mind to the concept of Natural Origins. You must show me this simple procedure to make the claim of natural origins for without such evidence, all you have is a faith-based idea without any supporting evidence to the contrary... Show me the logic; how any mathematical procedure can self-create, such is needed in the concept of origins... Show me the logistics or admit that you 'believe' on faith alone.
nooneeagle 4 weeks ago
We have evidence of synthetic biology ('creation') in the lab and 'design' (genetic engineering) in the lab but no evidence in the lab of natural origins. So if the possibility exists of design and creation, then the stance of natural origins must consider these evidence based positions as 'possibilities' of life and evolution by 'outside means' other than by natural means only. NeoDarwinians ‘ignore’ the evidence in favor of natural origins, which has no evidence or validating lab work...
nooneeagle 4 weeks ago
In the concept of creating and manipulating 'code', the creator of such code can program code to replicate and even evolve but in the history of man, never has any evidence arisen that code, any sort of code, can naturally originate as in the concept of self creating itself especially self-create into intelligence as is the claim of Natural Origins, the cornerstone and basis of Evolution. If you think it's possible, produce the evidence to such to back your claim...
nooneeagle 4 weeks ago
In the logistical stance of computer programming in codecs, the concept of 'self-creating' code is a fallacy that is known and accepted to be a false stance (no evidence and intelligently accepted as being false) For someone in the biological fields to state otherwise as in the stance of natural origins has no basis for such claim in which they use an un-proven stance as the cornerstone of life’s origins in which the ToE fails the scientific method.
nooneeagle 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Self-creating code, evolving into intelligence is a stance that has no evidence, which makes it a stance based on faith alone. Natural Origins is a 'faith' based cult in which, is the cornerstone and basis of the atheist "religion" we call Evolution. Evolution is not a true Theory when it's based on faith and consciously ignores supporting evidence to the contrary.
nooneeagle 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Code has never been shown to 'self-create'. There is no evidence in the history of humanity that code, any type of code as in RNA/DNA/Computer code can originate out of nothing... 0 + 0 = 0 is a true statement where Abiogenesis/Natural Origins takes this stand, 0 + 0 = 1 in which it is a false statement in the logic of codecs.
nooneeagle 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We have PoP of synthetic biology ('creation') in the lab and 'design' (genetic engineering) in the lab but no evidence in the lab of natural origins (NO evidence of self-creating code). So if the possibility exists of design and creation and Natural Origins has no evidence, then think about 'where' the evidence actually points...
nooneeagle 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hear what God of Israel YAHUSHUA-YAHUWAH (Son and Father are ONE) saying to our generation by His chosen prophets: Trumpetcallofgodonline. com ; Letter called "Purify Your Faith, and Come to the Father as It is Written": EXCERPT: "Only in the Bible and through these very Letters, of which I have given to My prophet of the end of this age, shall you find Him and know Him."
Watch:
"youtube.com/watch?v=INH-lNUQQZg"
"youtube.com/watch?v=lutJYDxP6ys"
"youtube.com/watch?v=R9ike7PKd8U"
Regards.
TrumpetCallofGodLT 1 month ago
on minute 00:31 SOMEHOW.... the most unscientific word in modern English.
MHBtubeful 1 month ago
This video is a scientific embarrassment. Good thing they used computer animation so that they could invent evidence—just like any other Victorian Era Darwinian tall tale.
wwwTrueFreethinker 1 month ago
@wwwTrueFreethinker It's good to see you know nothing of science :P
Alphacaliber 1 month ago
@Alphacaliber I see that you have no substantive response and so you rely on school yard taunts. Simply work on developing the discernment skills to parse between fact and gap filler and you will readily discern the scientific language that is used to mask the atheist propaganda.
wwwTrueFreethinker 1 month ago
@wwwTrueFreethinker You are litteraly too stupid to insult.
Alphacaliber 1 month ago
unsatisfying clip!! before u start with dna and cellwalls you should first explain how the first nucleotides formed RNA and how rybozymes where able to perform kathalytic reaction etc...there are many steps before a complete dna molecule that replicates itself!!!
schwiizrapkritikNo1 1 month ago
@phatburger100. Have you ever heard of the Apocrypha? Furthermore, the Council of Nicea 325 AD? The bible has NOT been changed???? Are you insane??? Just take a look at the many version there are today! Psycho Creationist.
michel5891 1 month ago
SCIENCE RULES!!!!
Thinkdeep420 1 month ago
First 20 seconds and i know this is wrong. "...There is no oxygen in th air. Molten lava is...." Molten Lava!?! If there is no Oxygen how can combustion be supported!
phatburger100 1 month ago
@phatburger100
Molten lava doesn't come from *burning* rock, it comes from *melting* rock. Heat. Not combustion. You should really learn some science before attempting to criticize it.
pseudorandomly 1 month ago
i've just passed my biology exam! thank you!!!!
superfunny1972 1 month ago
@leatherneck2044 And your horseshit belief system of a space daddy that created everything isn't fantasy? You're pathologically delusional my friend. At least the Science has sufficient amounts evidence for Evolution and Human Evolution specifically, as opposed to parthenogenesis among human beings and people raising from the dead, oh and a man being swallowed by a "big fish", yet surviving the incident to tell it all. The most important question here is, How is your Science Literacy?
michel5891 1 month ago 6
@michel5891 Evolution is a lie. Its pure fantasy. i have studied it for hours. All of it is made up stories except true natural selection. Then you come with your trite arguments about space daddys. Nature can't produce life, fact. Law of biogenesis, so evlution is not correct. Science proved it wrong. You are a science illeterate. You think dead matter becomes life. It never has never will. logically God is beyond nature itself. The laws of nature can't account for life. Think about it
marigolds44 1 week ago
@Respectmyhate Yes.
michel5891 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@khara205
You make the assumption that if a god does exist, you picked the right one.
If it turns out to be Allah, Zeus, Ra, Thor, Voltan, Pan, Xenu, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, you're screwed.
Your odds have not really improved at all. You'd best hope the Atheists are right; thn you can get on with your life.
taicleis 2 months ago
@khara205
You make the assumption that if a god does exist, you picked the right one.
If it turns out to be Allah, Zeus, Ra, Thor, Voltan, Pan, Xenu, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, you're quite screwed as well.
Your odds have not really improved at all. You'd best hope the Atheists are right; thn you can get on with your life.
taicleis 2 months ago
i dont know why anyone should be anything the other says.just believe whatever that you want to believe.at the end if god exists,atheists are screwed, however who believe in god will get what they have worked for. but if god doesnt exist,atheists would not get anything nor lose anything, its just that they were right, and believers.well you have missed to try forbidden things, depending on your religion. As I see it, the only losers are atheists :) Ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure ;)
khara205 2 months ago
Creationists
isamelbou 2 months ago
Creations are stupid.evolution is the best explanation of the story of life
isamelbou 2 months ago
@isamelbou If you think making up stories is an explanation then your lost.
marigolds44 1 week ago
"and somehow"........ hahahhaha
The1mrninja 2 months ago in playlist From Big Bang To Man
@The1mrninja Yeah, science actually admits when we do not know. But, look at ALL we DO know. Be a bit humble, eh?
avedic 2 months ago in playlist From Big Bang To Man
@Leatherneck2044 go to Nasa mate
Marios867 2 months ago
This video is pure speculation and is based on not one speck of actual evidence. It is fantasy, much like evolution.
leatherneck2044 2 months ago
Young skulls full of mush go to college and get indoctrinated into the bullshit of evolution. They remain emotionally-stunted but their ego grows large and convinces them they are smart. Thus, in their immaturity, they assume that anyone who doesn't agree with the propaganda they believe is "dumb."
leatherneck2044 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@leatherneck2044
Young skulls full of mush go to church and get indoctrinated into the bullshit of religion. They remain emotionally and educationally stunted but their delusion grows large and convinces them they are correct. Thus, in their immaturity and inability to think freely, they assume that anyone who doesn't agree with the propaganda they believe is "doomed."
nolobede 1 month ago
o.O I don't get how people can believe that creation of the universe can be explained by god when it really just poses more questions about the creation of god...
catsnpancakes 3 months ago
Hey, kiddos, want to see a fairy tale that adults really believe? Google whale evolution and go watch a 7 minutes video on the PBS web site that shows how an ancient 200 pound wolf searched for food along the beach, wander out into the surf, and morphed (evolved) into a 100 ton whale. There is nothing scientific about it, but nonetheless, this is the fairy tale that some adults really believe! Especially comical are the nostrils migrating to the top of the head to become a blow hole!
achilles197474 3 months ago
Comment removed
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago
Comment removed
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago
@achilles197474
You idiot, that's not what evolution theory says about whale evolution. PBS doesn't say that either.
Who does say that? Religiotard creationists like you, spreading nonsense as if it were fact.
You're getting more and more desperate as you see the numbers of creatards shrinking.
That's just too damn bad.
Pray to your invisible, magical superfriends that the Genesis story will stop being proven false.
Let me know how that works out for you.
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago
@achilles197474 Miss-characterize evolution.
CupidDanger 3 months ago
@achilles197474 Everytime a creationist opens his or her mouth, they broadcast to the world their total ignorance of how evolution through natural selection actually works.
It's really good for them that everyone on here operates under a pseudonym. It'd be embarrassing for them, for their friends and neighbours to find out who was spouting this mindless gibberish.
Thunderf00t ends some of his videos:
"Why do people laugh at creationists? Only creationists don't know why."
Genechanger 2 months ago
Listen to all the people who think humans should believe in god and should not do research on what is what and how is how of everything in the universe and on the planet , Then GO LIVE IN CAVE , the internet your on came from the same scientific research like this one
djay00009 4 months ago
how about specialized "because" different culturing; instead of for? were not delusional sociopaths... that is preposterous not humble and investigative.
prosimion 4 months ago
Comment removed
prosimion 4 months ago
lol.. nice paper cut out CGI u got there
DaFleegsta 5 months ago
Where is the record of all theses so called life forms that "evolved"? There should be a rich fossil record (even of microscopic life)...there isn't. Science claiming that the universe came from "nothing" and then saying that life "evolved" on earth without a record of its linear path of life (fossils) shows me that their "theories" are bordering on the rediculous. The sad thing is, the gulible look at this propaganda and consider it true.
bheadh 5 months ago
@bheadh you sound crazy spouting unjustified claims.......
azmanabdula 5 months ago
@bheadh evolutionists just watch things like this to make them feel better. Creation is so much more logical. and the debates always end with christians are a bunch of stupid heads, im really kind of tired of it, its almost not worth debating. everything in life degrades in time not one thing improves with time, yet you put a million years at the end of everything you get something better. no logic. the obvious truth is there back by obvious reason and logic. yet they refuse to see.
gotthepanzershreck 4 months ago
Respond to this video... buts its all good, all it does prove the word of God true some more. "proffessing to wise they became fools in their understanding" it goes something like that lol. you see it in these people. they compromise basic critical thinking and reasoning skills just to hold on to something where the odds are 1:10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000. No competent human being would bet there their last french fry at those odds. RECOGNIZE THE DESIGN
gotthepanzershreck 4 months ago
@gotthepanzershreck I have been around the block a few times to recognize that I am limited. I don't have all the answers. God says (through the bible) "He who says there is no God is a fool"....and "They certainly had knoweledge of God, yet they did not glorify him as God and give him thanks; they stultified themselves through SPECULATING TO NO PURPOSE and their senseless hearts were darkened". This simple Quote has modern day "science" pegged. They sit there and "theorize" way to unexplain God
bheadh 4 months ago
@bheadh Uhh, we don't try to find ways to DISPROVE god, we try to find out what makes more SENSE. One being has been alive forEVER and ever and ever and ever and he created everything! we all have souls, when we die we're going to join this being and float around in peace and joy for the rest of forever. -blank stare- you think that didn't cause someone, one day, to be like "now wait a minute......that doesn't make a bit of sense."
XmisszombitchX 4 months ago
@XmisszombitchX What man fails to realize is: Man is limited. He doesn't have all the answers (although with people like R. Dawkins, he thinks HE does.) I disagree with you about the explainations "science" makes about the "big-bang", make sense. Man can only see a very tiny part of creation. Yet he seems to think that he has all the answers to how it started and why it's here. Consider, Nothing can come from nothing. Something (the universe) can come about if Something (God) always existed.
bheadh 4 months ago
@bheadh your calling the big bang wrong ? you are really calling it wrong ?? or just a theory . Wow , Incredible , There is so much proof for it , and not just little , The proof is everywhere , Its prove is so much strong that almost 100 % of the science community strictly believes in it . If you have no knowledge about anything , Why do you bothering mentioning it ?? Why ? Go read a book
djay00009 4 months ago
@djay00009 No, I didn't call the Big-bang "wrong". It's the origin of the event that I question here.
bheadh 4 months ago
Dawkins won't debate with creationists who are scientists, such as the scientists at ICR, The Institure for Creation Research. Ask him why? Read my Internet article: ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. This article will also explain the scientific impossibility of life evolving into existence.
Mogley52 5 months ago
@Mogley52 Evolution and abiogenesis are 2 completely different things.
DaFleegsta 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible in nature (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). Besides, species couldn't have survived with vital tissues, organs, biological systems still evolving? I discuss Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA." Read Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You can name the species you know.
tobirates 5 months ago
Comment removed
tobirates 5 months ago
whats if religion disappear ,then how we will recognise that someone is stupid its a perfect test
dhampir1000 6 months ago
This is the conventional model for explaining the origin of life on the earth, from a primordial soup, due to lightning, the sun, and gases. But the new discoveries show that CHEMOsynthesis is the process that gave rise to life on earth. The old text books are to be used no more to explain how life originated on earth. All Christians and other Religious idiots STFU and read a fuckin book other than the bullshit you call a bible!
michel5891 6 months ago in playlist From Big Bang To Man 10
@michel5891 Has the chemosynthesis hypothesis been tested in a lab?
RespectMyHate 1 month ago
@michel5891 you dare insult christian we worship god respect or be left behind
leo196able 2 weeks ago
Reading the prior dialogues convinces me we evolved from slime mold- we insult primates. Why don't the fanatics jump off a building to prove gravity doesn't exist?
playsblueswolf 6 months ago
If you are not an atheist then you are an enemy of reason and are most likely: a fuckin idiot!
kuzzca 6 months ago
Who else thought it looked like a bunch of shit at 1:15 ?
RenpikaRozen 6 months ago
i am not responsible to Your God, who puts fossils, i would like some more wise God :)
in fact today being atheist is much wiser then believe in all those Gods (Alah, Jahve or Buddha all the same)
but this is a problem- atheist is also believer, best if all religions just vanish:) and churches to and politics along :)))
underns 6 months ago
hey pulp, don't forget that life took billions of years to evolve. You cannot create life in labs how ever advanced we are
Sai0i 7 months ago
@Sai0i We can create RNA, its not a long stretch to create life from that.
Sweddude 6 months ago
4 billion years ago? I guess this guy doesn't know that the Earth is 6,000 years old.The Earth looks old because the stuff with which God created the Earth is billions of years old. Sorry, but there is a god to whom we're all responsible. If this guy knows exactly how all this stuff happened, then he should be able to produce a cell in a lab, but he can't.
PulpPractical 7 months ago
@PulpPractical lol lol lol , wtf are you talkin about ? the god put dinosars fossils there to decorate earth ? to look older ? or adam & eve hanged with t-rexes ?
and what stupid relativization is that about the cell ?
bluzercic 7 months ago
creationists: instead of always criticizing evolution, how about giving us some concrete proof for creationism? (btw Bible doesn't count as solid evidence, since we all know it could very well have been altered throughout centuries. it is at best only a 'suggestive' evidence)
Casshyr 7 months ago 6
@Casshyr 107,597,707,791 have been estimated to live on the earth since the year 1 A.D. Let's say only 10% (extremely low figure) Knew about the bible. Not ONE person out of 10,759,770,779 wrote that ANYTHING in the bible was changed. Its just logical the bible hasn't been changed. And there is plenty of evidence that disproves evolution/darwinism.
phatburger100 1 month ago
@phatburger100 "107,597,707,791 have been estimated to live on the earth since the year 1 A.D" => LOL r u kidding me? That's 107 billions dude. Are you sure you copied your source right?
Casshyr 1 month ago
@phatburger100 "And there is plenty of evidence that disproves evolution/darwinism. " => you mean evidence propose by creationists like Kent Hovind, who can't somehow publish his argument into peer-review scientific journals? Here's something you should know about science: if it's not in peer-reviewed journals, it's not scientific evidence. This goes for both atheist and theist. I don't simply read what's on atheist website and trust it. I trust peer-reviewed papers.
Casshyr 1 month ago
@PAULOcbi
But um interested in comparison of religions too. For me, Judaism, Christianity & Islam are no more than Windows XP then Vista then Windows 7 respectively ... all upgraded versions of the same essence, typical in calling to believe in Abraham's God ... All claim having divine books, moreover; it’s known historically that Abraham is the biological great grandfather of Moses, Jesus & Muhammad making them basically members of one dynasty.
I prefer these three religions among all others!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love Judaism is a redaction of Zoroastrianism,Buddhism and Hinduism.Christianity is nothing but Reformist Judaism,based on Rabbi Hilels` teaching that the whole of Torah is summed up as "love thy neighbor as thyself' or 'the golden rule'.Quran and Islam are a redaction and plagiarism of Tanach/Gospels. Compare the story of Muhammad and Bahira it is exactly that of KingDavid in 1Samuel 16:1-16,also Aminahs visitation is copied from Luke1:26-38 plus many plagiarized verses from Tanach.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
Yes indeed ... If you read about any religion with a preconceived idea of NO Creator to this universe & life then they'll turn to no more than Ethics/ideologies.
But if you read with a Creator existence undoubted in mind then you'll start tasting it differently, not only that, but you'll realize which one is really a divine and which are only manmade corruptions in order to gain power and pull money out of donors pockets.
That's why I prefer to stick around the Creator first!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love Not all religions are mono-theistic. Zoroastrianism,of which Judaism is a redaction of was the 1st to espouse the mono-theistic tradition worshipping Mazda as the supreme authority,Judaism is a redaction of Buddhism,Hinduism and Zoroastrianism. Again your ignoring science and starting with a conclusion ,that there is "a creator existence undoubted in mind" 1st,this is inimical to reason as it exists only in your mind. Your logic is mainly just sophistry disguised as philosophy
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@extra222love and you didnt answer which religious cult you belong to?? I assume its one of the Abrahamic cults spawned by Judaism,which one is it??
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
I was raised in an atheist family ... but I believe now in "God the Creator" whatever other name he has as long as he is the one created this universe & pumped the life at the first cell 4 billion years ago then programmed it with the evolution which took care downstream!
Name him whatever you like: Allah, Father, Elohim, YHWH, Krishna or Brahma, X, Y or Z, I don't care!
But this world can't be a product of randomness; some supernatural entity must have created this universe & life.
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love 'some supernatural entity MUST have created..." This idea is nothing but a phenomenal appearance in the sensibility of yourself as a subject and a manner of species of representation passed from generation to generation.Read Hegels` 'ThePhenomenologyOfSpirit' it explains why we feel the need as humans to believe in something bigger than ourselves,its purely human physchological phenomena nothing more.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
"ThePhenomenologyOfSpirit" it explains why we feel the need as humans to believe in something bigger than ourselves", Thank you, but don't you think it's better to explain how LIFE existed? ... Or specifically ... how the first Prokaryotic Cell 4Ga got a complex structure and ultimately life? Beyond any reason of doubt ... don't waste your time explaining what happened before or after that moment ... It's all well known.
If you can't (which um sure of), then I suggest u think twice!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love I know the grand questions of specualtive metaphysics have not been answered,these questions of origin of cosmos and life are most likely unknowable and will remain so until the sun explodes..but thats not a good reason to attribute evrything unknowable to the supernatural,after all much of what humans attributed to the supernatural in history was proven by science to be perfectly natural and explainable,so theres not even a history of anything supernatural EVER existing.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
Where did you get from the definition of the Creator as supernatural/magic? Did you have a cup of coffee with him recently?
Why not he simply exists in a world with different dimensions other than the SpaceTime he created for us?
In the end of the day, M-Theory, suggested existence of worlds with other 7 dim's where non looks like ours.
Saying NO is typical to saying YES! It claims knowledge! Which um sure you don't own!
LIFE is no more than a product of an Xternal Force, not nature.
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love Its funny how bigoted you are, insisting your belief in the 'unknowable' is more accurate than my belief in the simple facts. Just goes to show the arrogance of theists. Its the definition of ignorance for you to insist your belief in the unknowable is more accurate than my belief in what we know to be facts. Its laughable how u said 'were talkin science here not poems' and then ignored ur own dialectic for the rest of our debate. Ur a hypocrite and a bigot, 2 fer 2.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
U saying "Ur a hypocrite and a bigot", just reminds me with the medieval church throwing negative attributes on whoever not in line with their beliefs, take a note, buddy!
And assuming that Iron, seats, steering wheel, spark plugs, engines and wheels ... just got the successful conditions to get together then ... BANG! ... Cars are running in HighWay 5, California! "CASE CLOSED" is good definition of what you're calling us to believe.
I wonder if ignorance does mean anything else!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love ...more sophistry.These grand questions of origin are unknown are probably unknowable and will remain so. No man who has ever walked the Earth has known the origin of the cosmos or life and any man that says he does is a liar.FACT That is the greatest truth you can understand in this life,that and that death is a certainty. that is the only truth. Yet you want to sacrifice this truth for the power of claiming to know the unknowable. "sacrifice the truth to power" we went thru this
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
"your belief in the unknowable is more accurate than my belief in what we know to be facts"
Are we debating Newton's Third Law of Motion here? Or even Evolution? ... Duh
We're discussing the most crucial challenge unanswered by science which is how the relatively simple organic building blocks polymerise and form more complex structures, interacting in consistent ways to form a protocell 4Ga.
I wonder who authorized you to announce "we know to be facts"
Straw man won't help!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love Your idea of a creator ,(while your in your scientific mode again lol,) is just an hypotheses,and an untested one at that.(How can you test the supernatural ??) You suffer from "Post coitum omne animal tristis est". Its perfectly natural phenomena so dont feel bad but get over it already. "The whole problem with the world is that fools and religious fanatics are so sure of themselves but wiser people are full of doubt." BertrandRussell....and rightfully so.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
In fact, the Protocell Project is all about disproving the need to "the Creator" by proving the existence of any "natural" process ends up with a living reproducing cell.
Hans Ziock [with his appreciated 3 yrs efforts] isn't the first trial to produce life in lab; Russian scientists went through a painful 15 yrs similar project ended up with some dead organic sh@t under the microscope.
Hans said he needs one more year to come up with something! So let's wait & see.
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love read Kants` "CritiqueOfPureReason" it will teach you to think more empirically and analytically and abandon your whims of the supernatural. With the profusion of religions the 'search for god' has become the biggest wild goose chase in mans` history. We will look back on history in the future at religion and our use of it as a time of dogmatic ignorance and error ,just like all other chimerical ideas have been proven wrong by science eventually monotheism will die as well.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
You've a terrible mix between two terms ... Creator ... & ... God.
Creator is a MUST to this universe & life if you believe in the school 3rd grade principle of Cause/Effect.
And God is an ideological term ... where many misused along the history ... however, if somebody misuse cars, it doesn't mean cars are bad!
Regardless Kants’s lovely poems, the question is whether these two terms should merge in one or stay apart?
Hypothetical Q: Does the Creator need us to worship him?
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love "Creator is a MUST"..the way b4 we understood precipitation a 'rain creator' was a MUST? Dont dismiss Kant ,reason is not simply a rational or cerebral activity but an intuitive grasp of the eternal reality within and without us. And now to the inevitable ?,if a creator created ALL then who created the creator? Ah I bet you insist the universe cannot be a self-existing matrix but the creator definitely MUST be self-existing,totally unknowable Im betting u know tho answer tho,lol.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@extra222love your funny... a complete bigot with little or no empirical facultites but still funny. I guess you have to be a bigot to be religious in 2011 ,the information age. Think about the evolution of the solar system,Earth and biological life,billions of years it was ,all so the Pope can tell us wether or not to wear condoms,,,,this is reasonable to you?? lmao
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
[This Pope condoms "thing" made me burst in laughter! lol]
OK, let’s put it straight; I might agree w/you scientific facts had killed the fake Gods.
But it’s only the Creator who is supported by Logic & Cause/Effect.
The fact that all of us evolved from a single cell existed 4Ga, puts all of us equal in front of the Creator, no matter the color or race, so if you find a religion which puts a man on a higher rank or being a giver of God's mercy, then it's FAKE! & CORRUPT! Full stop
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love hypocrisy ,bigotry,abandoning reason and sacrificing the truth all for the power of believing you know the unknowable and I guess so you can sleep at night knowing you are under the watchful gaze of an omni-present patriarchial god-king who has only your morality on his mind . Sounds like a lack of integrity to me and lack of courage or laziness to do your own metaphysical inventory and come up with your own philosophy.Spirituality comes from within not (religious) books.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
"Spirituality comes from within not (religious) books" ... I do agree ... and I guess I was practicing this since the beginning of our lovely conversation. Did I mention any "claimed to be a" holy book? Nope ... It's all derivation from pure logic.
It's obvious you're still jailed within ideologies of medieval church [even u look against it], Thus, I invite you to free yourself from such historical crap, Remember, If cars were misused, it doesn't mean they're bad but the misuse!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love your philosophy is the same as the reformist Judaism called Christianity based on Rabbi Hilels 'GoldenRule' . God just wants us to be nice and luv thy neighbor,lol. Not only is the existence of a creator unknowable but you are claiming you also know what he wants,lol. This is bigotry of the highest order and you my friend have a bigoted and hypocritical philosophy just like ALL the monotheistic religions. Insisting you know whats on the creators mind is the werst kind of bigotry
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
The Creator "being the ultimate power" does NOT need us to worship him, didn't create us to travel a journey of guilt with a stick "on his hands" threatening to be burned. All such sadistic images are no more than a production of the sick corrupt religious people.
Do u know what does the Creator want from us? VERY SIMPLE, Just take care of what he created. Don't (kill, rape, steal, lie, betray, etc.) but (Help, support, etc.)
Worshipping = Protect what he Created. Full STOP.
extra222love 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
LIFE CREATOR is the one who made LIFE after NO LIFE.
So, suggesting Creator (1) created the Creator (2) who created life, automatically eliminates Creator (2) to claim being the dividing line between LIFE and NO LIFE because he was already given LIFE by creator (1).
So basically, any CREATED entity cannot stand as the "Life Creator"
It's always the privilege of the first one “God the Creator”
Who created the Creator? is no more than a straw man fallacy.
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love hypocrisy,insisting sumthing complex like universe MUST have been created but in the same breath denying that a MORE complex being like a supernatural-god king needs a creator and any other notion is "straw man fallacy" ?,lol. No logic whatsoever in your philosophy. Strange evolution when people have come to believe ,thru religion,that they are the universes` greatest collusion ,when really were just a collection of cells,over-rating themselves "hello god?" and avoiding the truth.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@extra222love Although there are still scientific debates about what actually happened on the early Earth, Abiogenesis, as defined as life coming from non-life, has been achieved. I quote Eckard Wimmer's group who synththesyzed an RNA virus, the recent work of Craig Ventor who created Mycoplasma laboratorium from non-living components, and , of course, the wonderful pioneering work of Dr. Frankinstein.
gamesbok 7 months ago
@gamesbok
Thank you for the comment, however, the following must be straightened out in order not to confuse readers with what really was produced in Lab:
1- Eckard Wimmer, who led the study, denies that he has created life.
"No, I would not say I created life in a test tube," Wimmer said in a telephone interview. "We created a chemical in a test tube that, when put into cells, begins to behave a little bit like something alive. Some people say viruses are chemicals and I belong to that group"
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love It was actually a joke about Frankenstein, but never mind. Wimmer's chemical's behaving like something alive, and something alive is a distinction without a difference I think, but I wouldn't claim a virus as an independant life form. Craig Ventor's raw materials were not alive, and then they were. Although he did not simulate the processes that occured on early Earth, he did, strictly speaking, animate dead material, abiogenesis.
gamesbok 7 months ago
@gamesbok
This might describe what been achieved in Lab so far.
Thanks to the inspirer ... Dr. Frankenstein ... lol
extra222love 7 months ago
@gamesbok
2- Craig Ventor was the first to successfully create what was described as "synthetic life." This was done by synthesizing a very long DNA molecule containing an entire bacterium genome, and introducing this into another cell, analogous to the accomplishment of Eckard Wimmer's group!
3- Let's wait for Dr. Hans Ziok's "Protocell Project", he needs one more year!
4- No body created a "REAL LIFE" in lab so far.
5- Until then, Abiogenesis will remain no more than unproven Sci-Fi dreams!
extra222love 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
The Cause/Effect principle mandates an Xternal force with "prior knowledge" to build the Protocell just like when Ether was logically mandated to xplain how light waves could travel in the empty space.
Hence, the unlucky Ether got the blowing hit once Special Theory of Relativity proved that Light photons do have MASS characteristics rendering "him" useless.
Similarly, if Life gets produced in Lab only then the concept of the Creator will become useless!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love "the concept of a creator will become useless." ."Religion is mans` favorite toy and will remain so as long as he is afraid of death."Kant "Humans cannot endure emptiness and desolation,they will fill the vacuum by creating a new focus of meaning." Hegel. When we didnt understand precipitation we created the 'rain god',for thunder we created Thor etc. etc. as long as we dont understand it humans will invent something to fill the void. Which is why you create god in your mind.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
Nice video, but:
At 00:16 "Hard to imagine but this harsh environment was perfect for nurturing a miracle"
and At 00:29 "And somehow, when the smoke cleared there was something new! Something amazing, a very very special molecule with a graceful spiral shape"
It looks that scientists studied in Disney World, or brainwashed by Universal Studios.
I can't swallow what happened at this moment without the effect of an external force usually referred to as the Creator to pick the favorable process.
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love because science cant answer evry last detail %100 by providing evry scrap of evidence needed you MUST believe in a supernatural god-king by default of which there is absolutely zero evidence?? Your statement sounds completely crazy to me. Because sciencve only supplies %95 of evidence you MUST by default believe in sumthing which supplies %0 of evidence,lol. Have a coffee
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
Soup Theory, suggested 4 steps:
1- Reduced enviroment. (Proven by Miller-Uray)
2- Monomers formation (proven by Miller-Uray).
3- Monomers fusion to Polymers.
4- complex organic polymers and ultimately life were developed.
And it's around the last two points of the theory that much of the debate now centers, were all evidences suggest the opposite, since nature prefers to disintegrate Polymers back to Monomers, and dismentle RNA not to build it!
Is this a 95%? What a disney world!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love yea Im not talking about theories ,Im into demonstrable fact backed up by empirical evidence.BigBang is a Theory not fact.The only thing we know for sure is the Universe is a self-existing matrix,4dimensions,3spatial,1temporal,they are incontrovertible and cannot be altered even by ones own movement and governed by the GravitationalConstant.So theres no supernatural god-king or miracles and even if we dont know how life started that doesnt mean it occurred supernaturally.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
BigBang Theory got the majority consensus of the scientific elite, Yes, 4 dim's but the latest M-Theory (the merge of the 5 parent Superstrings Theory) proved the existence of 11 dim's worlds.
To name the universe as self-existing is a terrible error b/c it's against the conservation laws of Mass, Energy & Momentum! It should have an origin!
It’s UNKNOWN from where the Mass of the Universe came from, and the expanding Energy as well?
Science gave unknowns the name ... 'X'!
extra222love 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
Life Creator = Unknown or "X"
School 6th grade mathematics would know that Science opened "X" for all suggestions and asked evidence to be provided for any elimination attempt
So basically, suggesting:
X = External force usually referred as the "Creator" is legitimate until disproven with a solid evidence!
However, others can suggest:
X = Primordial soup
X = Aliens/Astronaut fart
X = DNA via Comets
Show your evidence that "God the Creator" should be eliminated off the list!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love Primordial soup has little evidence,BlackHoles function is posited to be that of spatial/temporal displacement,and I believe their function plays a more important part in the Uni. than we know. Aliens/AstronautFart ?You mean 'Panspermia'? Panspermia doesnt explain the existence of matter,only biological life. DnA via comets is already shown to be quite possible but still doesnt explain the existence of the matter that makes up bio-life.These theories have sum evidence,god has zero
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
1) Science didn't concretely Xplain how Life started.
2) Math equt'n, Life Creator = X, doesn't enforce any REASON in order to suggest X but REASON to disprove
3) Life Creator = X, incorporates an action & actor, CAUSE & EFFECT.
4) Forensic science & investigation puts all X's on the table then disproves with REASON.
5) If Newton tried to solve, Apple Puller = X, by something visible! We would remain on HORSES today!
X = God the Creator is 100% valid until disproven with REASON!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love "The grand questions of speculative metaphysics cannot be answered by science yet but the sciences are firmly grounded in the laws of the human mind." The idea of a supernatural god-king is only a phenomenal appearance in the sensibility of yourself as a subject and a manner of species of representation.Evolution is occuring b4 our eyes as Atheism rises,its the emancipation of the human conciousness from a state of dogmatic ignorance and error.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
Dude, We're talking science here, not poems!
Nature flows water from Top to Bottom, so in order to resist nature we need an external force by a PUMP.
Nature flows heat from Hot to Cold, so in order to resist nature we need an external force by an Air-Con.
Nature dismantles RNA to Polymers then disintegrates to Monomers, so in order to resist nature we need an external force by a Builder/Creator to successfully build the first protocell w/RNA 4Ga.
If nature only, we wouldn't be here!
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love very good ,"were talking science here" now obey your own stated dialectic. There is no empirical evidence,not even building block #1 of evidence for the creation theory.Science requires empirical evidence to reach a conclusion,so stop your sophistry,claiming to obey the laws of scientific analysis and in the same breath totally abadoning them.lol. Your being a bigot and a hypocrite in one statement. Belief in god is inimical to science and reason.Have a coffe pal.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
The default is that the suggestion X = God the Creator exists among all other possible X's suggested for the equation Life Creator = X
The question is NOT; How to prove him? This is no more than a cheap fallacy
The correct question (mathematically & forensically) is; How to disprove him?
Of which I challenged you to do so, but clearly you sneaked away!
I can disprove all other possible X's in the List, even if Santa Claus was one of them!
By the way, I'm a believer in evolution too.
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love "The question is not to prove him?" There you go again,in one statement you say "were talking science here" now its " the questiion is not to prove him"..you are being bigoted and hypocritical again.Know this-"Asked if an object can have certain properties prior to the experience of that object? No.All objects of which the mind can think must conform to its manner of thought." You cant give evidence or prove the existence of a god which exists only in your mind.Stop your sophistry
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@extra222love what religious cult are you a member of ? you said you believe in evolution what religious cult are you affiliated with?
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
"what religious cult are you affiliated with?" is a Good question
If you find a religion which claims it has an ancient divine book, then opened this book to read the Creator saying:
1- I'm proud of making ALL LIFE out of a SINGLE CELL swam in ocean.
2- I'm proud of evolving you "mankind" from totally different species.
3- I'm the only one who witnessed the time when you were walking on FOUR.
4- I sent ADAM to you as the first PROPHET (not the FIRST MAN!).
What would you think?
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love Ive read BookOfTao,Confucious,I Ching,Tanach and Talmud,Gospels,Quran and many Hadiths and studied Buddhism,Zoroastrianism and Hinduism as well. Evry one is a redaction of the other and all are just mans` early attempts to introduce Ethics/Orthodoxy to its savage diety worshipping population.Nothing more nothing less.Theres more science in an undergraduate biology text,more morality in a GeorgeEliot novel,more philosophy from Aristotle alone, than in all of them put together
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@extra222love actually there is no evidence for Panspermia,however that doesnt preclude the existence of Alien life,to say there is no Alien life is very naive considering how much of the universe we have knowledge of.It would be like taking a drinking glass to the oceans edge,scooping up a glassful of ocean and declaring,"Nope! No whales in here!" But still believing in Panspermis doesnt require the leap to belief in the supernatural so its def. more plausible and even more lucid IMO
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
@PAULOcbi
By the way, I can disprove any other Life Origin Theory with a strong evidence!
Why not we start the ride? ... Give suggestions
extra222love 7 months ago
@extra222love and thats exactly what it would be a ride in circles. You believe in the supernatural so it is impossible to maintain a dialectic with you or any creationist.For truth you must search the facts and evidence and then come to a conclusion/idea,as a creationist/deist you are doing it backwards,starting with an conclusion/idea and then wrenching evidence to fit that conclusion/idea. Your ideology is inimical to reason and sacrifices the truth to power.
PAULOcbi 7 months ago
somehow? tut tut.
eukayra have helical DNA. Bacteria have sperical DNA. Nevertheless, DNA based life eveolved in the archean eon. The first live was not DNA based. Sponges have been show to be part of teh lineage of tnephores and cnidarians.
Shepherd1OFH 7 months ago
somehow? tut tut.
eukayra have helical DNA. Bacteria have sperical DNA. Nevertheless, DNA based life eveolved in the archean eon. The first live was not DNA based.
Shepherd1OFH 7 months ago
Evolution is a lie and if you buy into you are basically stating you are a communist dunghole rat.
Here's a fact idiots, Evolution is simply a lie that you MORONS overlook, it is simply a government cover up to hide the truth of 9/11.
aJerseyThing 8 months ago
Evolution is a load of bullshit and if you buy into it you are simply stating your a communist dunghole.
Hear's a fact people, Evolution is a lie conceived by the government to hide the truth behind 9/11.
aJerseyThing 8 months ago
@aJerseyThing you sir, are RETARDED.
ironlung1028 8 months ago
@aJerseyThing Really? Go troll somewhere else. Maybe somewhere you'd fit in....how about a Christian Gospel video??
MetalxXxMayhem 8 months ago
@MetalxXxMayhem why are you hitting on religion, you ignorant atheist prick.
aJerseyThing 7 months ago
@aJerseyThing Maybe because it deserves to be shit on!! What the FUCK does Evolution have to do with 9/11 anyways? NOTHING!!!
MetalxXxMayhem 7 months ago
@MetalxXxMayhem yes it does you idiot retard. why don't you just got study the bible you muslim extremist.
aJerseyThing 7 months ago
@aJerseyThing You were right the first time. I AM an Atheist. Your the crazy retard doing mental gymnastics to believe that shit, along with your random accusations of me being Muslim. Your an IDIOT!!
MetalxXxMayhem 7 months ago
@MetalxXxMayhem Hit the road towel head. Only someone with the name Metal Mayhem (muslim towel head retard that is a suicidal pyromaniac fuck) would choose such a name. Go blow up a Taliban building why don't you. Leave youtube out of it.
aJerseyThing 7 months ago
@aJerseyThing Are you people seeing this shit?? This guy is fucking NUTS!!!
MetalxXxMayhem 7 months ago
@MetalxXxMayhem leave me alone you're so mean to me
aJerseyThing 4 months ago
@aJerseyThing ......fucking children.
MetalxXxMayhem 4 months ago
@MetalxXxMayhem you're the child using profanity. cool your jets mr. jetson
aJerseyThing 4 months ago
@aJerseyThing Profanity isn't childish. There's a reason we don't let KIDS cuss, but hardly say shit when adults do it. Just shut the fuck up.
MetalxXxMayhem 4 months ago
@MetalxXxMayhem You're being such a child. I suggest you take your childish profanity else where and stop trolling YouTube.
aJerseyThing 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@aJerseyThing
i am a muslim, you have something against it ?
bluzercic 7 months ago
hmmmmmmmm.............gay
ublec15 8 months ago
Some how he said hhhhhhhhh. He is god who created it u idiot
mafia1953 9 months ago
I figured the magic happened in deep sea thermal vents.
BuzzardlyThings 9 months ago
Does that worm which had the worlds first brain+eyes have a name?
i need that name for my science project...
jettrooper3rd 10 months ago
@jettrooper3rd If it is not too late for your project, I think Platyhelminthes is what you are looking for. If you search Platyhelminthes you may get some answers.
preptimenow 9 months ago
Evolution alone would NOT be capable for forming the MILLIONS of extremely diverse, unique varieties of life. For one thing- it would NOT be necessary; There are literally thousands of different kinds of fish- each extremely unique- especially in design, and colors. Tropical fish are so amazingly, and beautifully colored, and there are thousands of different kinds. The infinite variety of colors, shapes, and patterns of these thousands of fish are not necessary. ALL there needs to be for surv
TheWayandWordofLife 10 months ago
@TheWayandWordofLife then its random or some powerful being has an interesting imagination or we a have a single purpose created by many different purposes together.
scarydance3 10 months ago
@TheWayandWordofLife Be quiet. You won't listen to the science... and you don't say anything supportable. This discussion is over. You're talking to air.
dprice1291 9 months ago
@TheWayandWordofLife: "Evolution alone would NOT be capable for forming the MILLIONS of extremely diverse, unique varieties of life." And why not? Argument from ignorance/incredulity is a fallacy - you don't know what the environmental pressures on fish might even be. "All there needs to be is surv[ival, I presume]." No, there's still - always - competition, and evolution tries out lots of pathways to locate niches. Study of the cichlids in lake populations shows the possibilities.
puncheex 8 months ago
........Billions of years of fragile evolution...then BAMMMM! humans appear and kill everything!!!!!!
Titaniumgoblin 10 months ago
@theaccousticaddict "Yes scientists and evolutionists have observed materials, but they cant verify anything, its just theories, presumptions"
How else can ideas be verified except through observation? And the same can be said of ANY idea, even those based in religion or superstition.
evolutionisscience 10 months ago
God created everything, everything did not create itself, intelligence did not come from none intelligence neither did logic and lofe come from an illogical and none living source. We can only know the truth when we use our brains, when we open our minds to other possibilities (not limited by materialism) from what we chose to believe. Truth they say is always more stranger than friction
theaccousticaddict 10 months ago