Added: 4 years ago
From: infodocurama
Views: 53,505
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (466)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Right, hiding a wireless speaker inside a book bag and ranting like a loon into the mic and saying stupid shit about 9/11 sure doesn't make you Truthers any type of "heroes".

    Harassing and stalking an Ex-President of Government Official is nothing but trouble. Please by all means continue, just write back while serving a 7 yr. prison sentence.

  • According to the title, I should've been expecting a showdown against Bill Clinton, not some meaningless conspiracy theorist punk.

  • Leslie Raphael, Serendipity.li

  • What about the Bush and Bush the W. and Chaney, et al? If you're going to go after it don't be so half assed and biased.

  • i hate clinton but at least hes a vegan and not eating innocent animals murdered from factory nazi camps. .

  • Comment removed

  • Hey youngster,...lol.. I surely appreciate what you are doing...

    but be careful, the C's are rough customers.

    Andele, entonces.

  • keep up the amazing work i wish i could be there. but i gotta be wehre the snow is

  • i just want to say what an awesome job you are doing man.

  • Comment removed

  • And no one on these comments makes sense. Most of these comments look like they were written by lobatamy patients.

  • Bill clinton hasnt been president since last century. Give me a fucking break. This is stupid.

  • top man

    keep it up

    regards from the uk

  • This guy thinks like he knows everything as he said but what he knows what he seen on you tube. To say i have to know everything, i take more than that. The problem is most ppl have littel info and they try to expand it and that leads to confusion. The less you know the more you talk.

  • @nlb1231 He's Luke Rudkowski and he's a co-founder of the "We Are Change" political activism organization. He is extremely active in exposing the truth behind the Government & mainstream-media's countless lies & dis-info. He does very extensive research from a lot of accurate sources - NOT only from YouTube like you falsely said.

  • lol dude you shouldn't have told em what your secret was, so you can do it again!!!

  • Oh man, to have footage of that would have been awesome.

  • Your guys are awesome!

  • where is the video for that?

  • err? Sounds drunk to me..

  • where can we see the vid hes talking about????

  • where is the video at?

  • If Bill Clinton stands for change, then why We Are Change confronted him. Bill Clinton just received his wake up call.

  • omfg you guys are my hero's you are more patriot then patriot these people have only established debt there is only good reason to speculate it there fault cause it is shit doesnt go down hill if u want to go up wtf

  • Reading YouTube comments makes my brain hurt, and I lose all faith in humanity :(

  • I'd be very worried if I believed in something so strongly that it caused me to dismiss other living feeling human beings as "sheep".

    It was "dogs" and "cattle" the last time.

  • keep it up luke, you guys need to keep gettin up in these muthafuckers faces.

  • There are geologists and astrophysicists who will tell you the world is 6000 years old and dinosaurs lived with people. There are professors and experts in aerodynamics that will tell you that planes didn't even crash into the towers. Claims like this are obviously false; scientists that promote nonsense such as this are compelled to do so not through reason and evidence, but through delusion and fantasies they've developed about imaginary government plots.

  • I would have said. Hey Bill Clinton, why did you give us NAFTA which took away all our jobs?!

  • the reason for curfews

  • Yeah but you failed, and exposed yourself for the moron that you are, poor thing.

  • Flop goes the twooth muvemental !!

  • this video is great, but so fudging glitchy

  • @IndividualParties ah, someone is getting frustrated... x)

    You're an idiot, I know you're hopeless. I know that you cannot explain the drills on 911 (and 7/7 as well for that matter). I know I will not be able to reason you out of an emotional position.

    My point was merely to show you for the moron that you are (at least regarding 911 and probably many other things as well)... Now, go keep reinforcing that delusion and watch out for those pesky "facts".

  • @rgs11

    "someone is getting frustrated"

    LOL, yeah, that someone would be you, it must be frustrating knowing that you can't refute the PESKY FACT that the firefighters predicted the WTC7 collapse and evacuated a collapse zone. But I guess you still think they miraculously predicted the demise of an uncompromised building that just so happened to be rigged with top secret nano-thermite hush-a-bombs by a bunch of NWO Jews. Hurry, go to a 9/11 "truth" cult website to find out how to respond.

  • So now the 9/11 "truth" cult mythology requires that we believe the firefighters used psychic powers to predict the collapse of an uncompromised building that just happened to be secretly rigged with state of the art nano-thermite magical hush-a-bomb demollition technology.

    LOLOLOLOLOL @ the fucking "truth" cult

  • “I also believe the media appears to be mostly propaganda.”

    Very good, did you figure that one out all by yourself? You shouldn’t need the 9/11 “truth” cult scriptures on the internet to discern that fact. Of course, you can’t point to the agenda-driven media’s lack of integrity as evidence for any laughably preposterous government conspiracy you can dream up in your mind.

    As if the media were not bad enough, now we have 9/11 "truth" cult fanatics making up stories too.

    -_-

  • @IndividualParties no offense... seriously, but you have to be an idiot to believe the official story. Jet-Fuel in an open burn simply CANNOT MELT STRUCTURAL STEEL YOU FUC(ING MORON!!! X)

    JET FUEL: Maximum burning temperature, 980°C (1796 °F) Wikipedia, "Jet Fuel" (no hotter than 500-600 on 911)

    Structural Steel Melting Point: 2800 F

    Now, if you want to go back to idiot-land, read the "explanation" on "yahoo answers" because that's the only place you'll find one... (sigh) x)X)xDx>X)xDx)

  • @IndividualParties Oh yeah and I'd love to hear your "explanation" for why BBC broadcasted the collapse of 7 twenty min before it collapsed while it could be CLEARLY SEEN ON THE SKYLINE TO BE STANDING!

    Seriously, man, pull your head out of your ass... It's really pathetic.

  • @rgs11

    " broadcasted the collapse of 7 twenty min before it collapsed "

    The firefighters knew the building was going to collapse before it did. Were they in on the jew-plot too? LOL the firefigthers predicted the collapse-- and ofcourse cited the damage and fires as the reason-- and then evacuated a collapse zone. They told the media the buildings would collapse, a few networks accidently reported it collapsed before it did. Foreknowledge came from firefighters. See how easy that was?

  • @IndividualParties No, idiot, they weren't... Nice straw-man, tho. The firefighters were warned that the building was coming down and a collapse zone was cleared. Exactly, what's your point, here? Is this your explanation? You are sorry... And then the fuc(ing thing collapses at near free-fall; please do tell what happened to all the resistance...

  • @rgs11

    LOL, I love the way you keep repeating the canards you've been brainwashed with by your "truth" cult gurus. They predicted the collapse and cleared a zone, idiot. It's funny how you obviously didn't know that or you wouldn't have brought up the old BBC nonsense. The firefighters predicted the collapse, they told the media, some networks accidently said it collapse before it did. LOL, you're TOO easy. HURRY, go to your "truth" cult websites find out what to think, LOSER.

  • @IndividualParties

    good trollin,, XD

  • @klesks8686

    I know, it is good trollin. "truthers" are so fanatical in their cult mythology, it's fun to stir up the pot and see what kind of shit will rise to the surface.

    Every time I leave a comment on one of these vides, cult fanatics like rgs reply, kicking and screaming with some argument or myth they heard from loose change, DRG, or some other conspiracy occult guru. It's fun to rip out the hook and toss them back.

  • @IndividualParties Who are these cult fanatics?

    Are you talking about the 1,500 architectural and engineering professionals who said inside job.

    Think they have more experience with buildings then you.

  • @EasyEbookMan

    Scientists are not authorities. Scientists are capable of having nutty religious and political beliefs just like anyone else, and can thus ignore reality, such as the case of the 9/11 "truth" cult-the aim is to spread conspiracy occult mythology. The AE911 cult hasn't supported the laughably preposterous "controlled demolition" delusion with valid scientific evidence. Waving credentials around while kicking and screaming about imaginary government plots isn't very compelling.

  • @IndividualParties Fact.. "At Least 7 of the 9/11 Hijackers are Still Alive"... Wait a minute.. If someone flys a plane to destruction. It would occur to me that you would die.. Ohh wait a minute asking questions means I'm spreading occult mythology.. lol

  • Comment removed

  • @IndividualParties If you have any explanations for these and about a hundred others, please share them... as I'd much prefer to believe the official conspiracy theory, where the most sophisticated Air Defense just happens to fail and (oh yeah) just HAPPENS TO BE RUNNING "DRILLS" WHICH "SIMULATE" A HIJACKED 757 BEING FLOWN INTO THE TWIN TOWERS!

    Jesus, I'm wasting my time with an imbecile aren't I?.... meh...

  • @rgs11

    -_-

    LOL, meh keep reading your "truth" cult bible by DRG- theologian and scholar of trivia. I've heard these claims before, nothing new, you're just regurgitating what you've read without fact checking. Meh, keep believing your conspiracy occult MYTHOLOGY, meh.

    Jesus, why are you wasting your time, I'm not joining your 9/11 "truth" cult. I can't be brainwashed like you are. Unlike you cult fanatics, I understand the difference between REAL and IMAGINARY, meh.

    meh

  • @IndividualParties And that's why you're clearly an idiot. x) You cannot provide an explanation and so you resort to ad hominem. Please provide explanations and then you can engage in ad hominem. Until then, you're just another retard who doesn't know how to think for himself.

    Another thing: just because the official conspiracy theory is clearly false DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT IT WAS INSIDE JOB. The "cover-up" or official fabrication may HAVE BEEN NECESSARY FOR NATIONAL SECURITY. meh...

  • @IndividualParties So u don't believe Gov.. u don't believe We The People.. Are you waiting for ET to come tell you the truth.. lol.. Keep calling people names and don't challange the facts.. keep up the good work..

  • @EasyEbookMan

    We the people? LOL, you don't represent the entire population, only those who can't handle internet access. I know for someone in your state of delusion it probably seems like the gov. vs. 9/11 "truth" cult is all there is; but one does not have to be in the cult to distrust the government. Despite all they may have done, your laughably preposterous delusions about larger-than-life government plots or the "inside job" nonsense isn't plausible or true, it's a delusion.

  • @IndividualParties I like to stick with ONE important fact...

    "One source of data is a thermal map of Ground Zero created from infrared data collected by a NASA plane that overflew the site on September 16." Have you seen the pics? Hotspots?

  • @IndividualParties you are funny :)

  • This dude is inarticulate white trash.

  • @pdwade1

    Most followers in the NWO conspiracy occult are. Yes, some of the 9/11 "truth" cult gurus and NWO alarmists are eductated, but most of the followers seem to be a bunch of naive kids that spend too much time on conspiracy occult websites. Just watch alex jones rallies and look at the people around him...

    -_-

  • @IndividualParties ...I am too! I think the government treats the peasantry like cannon fodder and lives off the labor and property of others, especially the poor and ignorant. I also believe the media appears to be mostly propaganda. I've studied 911 for months and it appears to be an inside job. I guess you're either 1)a dumb little lamb that thinks the government loves you and is going to protect you from the terrorist 2) on the fence, or 3)NWO conspiracy cult. I'm the latter.

  • @911insidejo8

    "little lamb that thinks the government loves you"

    LOL, this is an old, and rather amusing, 9/11 "truth" cult fallacy-- "if someone doesn't accept my laughably preposterous fairytales about an inside job, controlled demolition, nano thermite, missile hitting the pentagon, fake phone calls, remote controlled airliners, roswell aliens bla bla bla, then they must a be a flag waving apologists for the incompetent American government. "

    -_-

  • @IndividualParties ...what do you expect from a conspiracy theorist!

  • If the NWO was quiet and didn't say anything they wouldn't be approached by some of these people.

  • YOU'RE DOING THE RIGHT THING! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!

  • Luke has balls, most of you are born pussies

  • @TyrannyLoses yah way to be a dick.

  • Look at this dumb idiot talking at the start of the video.  He must be a member of the Ku Klux Klan.

  • @ThePatrioticJew Like you, pussy

  • Hey mate you forgot something you should have told Bill we know about your oral sex sessions under your desk.....while you are supposed to be running the state

  • @WELLBRAN LOL! He did forget that question didn't he!

  • there is alot of goverments trash on this blog... you can tell. Luke is a hero

  • You people are so blinded by what the media/government tells you. The subject of 911 has more questions than it does answers. The commission that investigated was restricted Bush nor Cheney testified and more than half of the commission say they are unsatisfied with the investigation, yet you morons swallow it up and consider it the truth. NIST has recently released videos of witnesses accounts of explosions but your news media doesnt report it. The NWO is fast approaching yet the masses sleep.

  • @colombiaje yeh nothings stopping it, like you said the masses sleep, and still havent awaken.and I predict the majority wont

  • @colombiaje then why is there no sure proof `??

  • @stiggyh there is evidence, you have to research my friend. You won't find it on t.v.

    Its like this: If a criminal (the government/banks) commits an crime (Initiated the planes to hit the buildings/911) who would you ask to investigate it?

    A) the government

    B) the Media (Owned by the government and banks)

    C) FBI/CIA etc. ("Federal" AKA owned by banks/government)

    D) Investigators with no affiliation to the criminals and/or witnesses?

    I think D is obvious.

  • @stiggyh I meant to say investigators AND witnesses with no affiliation to the criminals.

    Also, when you learn history, and just scratch the surface of it you'll know how they work and how they do things... you dont even need to learn a lot, you'll find so many things you never knew existed. You'll shit bricks! For instance, our government has lied to us before to go to war for the past 100 years. Gulf of Tonkin for example. They do it because its a Eugenics project and it makes money

  • @Takiado yea thanks mate - i just keep hoping for that smoking gun evidence

  • @colombiaje all we can do is warn them... we cannot wake them up by ourselves, THEY have to figure it out by their own will. We can bring them to water, and we should, but they we can't make them drink it. :\ Continue your good will, sir, as I hope the rest of the awakened will do.

  • Not a "confrontation" which implies an exchange, more like an attack, and a pathetic one at that. But then again, it from wearechange, a pathetic group of teens and 20-somethings who think their role in life is to yell incoherencies at public figures in public venues. And then pat themselves on the back thinking they "confronted" someone, ROLF.

  • Comment removed

  • @Born2Flesh Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'm a sheep because I have trouble believing satellite-mounted weapons shot energy beams which took down the towers (Fetzer), or the images of the explosive impacts were "cartoons"/holograms (M. Reynolds), or the unmanned planes were directed into the buildings by Israelis with transponders (A. Hart), or all the conversations from the planes were voice-morphed (DRG), or thermate samples were found in the dust (Jones, Gage, et al). I'M a sheep? Well you're a jackass.

  • @ericDouglace like u can talk

  • @ericDouglace hello, go watch farhank501's videos. theyll open ur eyes. yes he sounds like a looney but thats because hes putting all these statements forward in a small amount of time. its like a muslim saying oh allah saves you and telling u that you need to become one.

  • This loon is an inside job.

  • This is Luke Rudkowski?

    Who are these fucking truthers? are they hippies? left-wing whores?When did they start disputing the official story? they are scary like some doom day cult..one of those American things I guess...

  • You really think anyone gave a shit about your speaker, no shit the SS was freaking out, they had no idea wtf that shit was, its a fucking former president of the US, one of the best we ever had, no shit, they did their job to protect clinton, hes trying to sign fucking books not listen to your sorry ass 9/11 inside job bs

  • This guy is a fucking joke

  • TyrannyLoses,

    ,

    I indeed invite anyone to put forward his or hers arguments. Select one of the many you suggested yourself. The one you think is your strongest argument.

    .

    And let's stick to the subject and discuss it. A discussion without doing a Gish gallop and preferable without personal insult and baseless accusations.

    .

    So, name your argument to start with.

    Just as a suggestion: Start with Jowenko?

  • Anyone who wants to see all the other facts this clown tries to convince himself dont exist go to his page im done with his braindead ass

  • If anyone wants to see that wimahlers guy get schooled click on his account

  • I present facts, you try to dodge and attack my character. If you're willing to admit that you were simply ignorant Ill hold no ill will against you. We were all ignorant once were living in a world of propaganda behaviorism and psychology. If you want to keep picking a fight I will continue to expose you as being completely wrong. Its entirely up to you, stop making excuses for MURDEROUS TYRANTS andI wont call you a coward

  • @TyrannyLoses,

    .

    "I present facts"

    .

    Presenting facts is easy. Presenting relevant facts is more difficult. Forming a well founded conclusion based on trustworthy verifiable cumulative and provenble facts and peer reviewed scientific methodological interferences is even harder.

    .

    You showed me the easy facts. Like: "The military will brainchip people".

    No context. No verification. No correlation. Followed by an unjustified biased preset, begging the question,conclusion.

    .

    Challenge me!

  • @wimahlers This braindead clown is still talking? Ive given you all the energy youre getting parasite. All anyone needs to do is click on your name to see its proven youre wrong and dont have a clue. Lets do a quick review the FACTS you PRETEND DON'T EXIST AND HAVE EVADED.

  • @TyrannyLoses Use your "I try to limit myself to purely rational, verifiable and preferrable scientific arguments." to explain why when WTC 7 was still standing completely upright with no structural damage whatsoever multiple news channels were reporting that it had already "collapsed" before it was DEMOLISHED and went from a fully upright building to a pile in its own footprint in 6 seconds.

  • @wimahlers I never said Jowenko was AN ABSOLUTE AUTHORITY as you attempted to frame, I asked you how much experience you have in controlled demolitions, which you evaded as you have everything you know you can't deal with.

  • @wimahlers You have also done a great job of trying to avoid the significance of the WTC 7 DEMOLITION altogether, as a weasel would. Why and when was WTC 7 rigged with explosives? Are you suggesting that in the 7 hours after the twin towers fell and WTC 7 fell Larry Silverstein assembled a team of engineers and explosives manufacturers to figure out what was needed where to bring it down? Aside from that being a logistical and physical impossibility, WHY would they do that?

  • @wimahlers You also EVADED addressing citing 1 skyscraper ever in history (nevermind 2 at the same time) that was built to withstand a planecrash being hit by a plane, not resulting in the building toppling over as a result of impact, remaining structurally upright for an extended period of time like 30 minutes while having localized fires at the point of impact and then within a matter of less than 10 seconds experiencing freefall collapse

  • fas.org/spp/military/docops/us­af/2025/v3c2/v3c2-4.htm

    Airforce 2025: The military will brainchip people

    So one hand we have someone acting like a paid disinformation agent relating microchips to reptiles as conspiracy theory, on the other hand we have the US AIRFORCE saying in 2025 THEY WILL BRAINCHIP PEOPLE.

    Who knows more this pimple on societys ass wihmwahlers or the AIRFORCE?

    CHUMP EXPOSED

  • Whether yourea paid shill or just a loser youve been proven wrong, ignorant, and not working in our interests coward.

    I notice you mention "microchips" in your post

    Microchips were ready in 2000 but first the masses had to be prepared through the "CULTURE INDUSTRY" that why youve got news stories about the club whose line you dont need to wait for with the chip, get the chip to track your kids, store medical records.

  • Lets tally the evidence.

    I have shown the "secretly elected" Dictator of the EU saying that GLOBAL GOVERNANCE is here. Hes the DICTATOR OF THE EU. Then theres this pimple wimwahlers or whatever.

    I wonder who has a more accurate idea of reality, the dictator running the EU telling you global government is here, or some loser that has some motivation to spread disinformation in the fight against tyranny. I welcome you to give up your ignorance unless your just a paid stooge loser

  • /watch?v=QEqFtVrAgSo

    0:44

    The Dictator of the EU who in his own words was "elected by a secret vote" (sounds real democratic.)

    0:44

    "2009 IS ALSO THE FIRST YEAR OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE WITH ESTABLISHMENT OF THE G20"

    So I'm glad that now anyone who sees this will understand that I'm right, what I say is based on fact and poses a threat to the future of all of us, it is clear that you are either working against our interests or are just a ignorant fool. Either way thanks for coming out genius

  • Under NAFTA, thousands of North Americans were fired so that corporations could move into the third world, where they could pay people between 22 cents and a dollar and 18 cents an hour. As a reward for firing thousands of North Americans and moving our ability to manufacture to the third world, these corporations were given a 10 YEAR PERIOD where if they CLAIMED not to MEET THEIR EXPECTED PROFITS, THEY WERE PAID BY NORTH AMERICAN TAXPAYERS TO MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE. YOU ARE BEING RAPED

  • I`m sure you don`t even know who Henry Kissinger is but I'll afford you the benefit of the doubt. Kissinger was recently asked "what is a terrorist?"

    His response "Someone who opposes Globalism" (TRANSLATION: SOMEONE WHO THINKS THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO HAVE A SOVREIGN NATION AND NOT BE RULED OVER)

    Globalism is the return to a feudal state with CEOs as the nobility and everyone else as serfs.

    That human wasteland Al Gore got freetrade agreements passed like NAFTA that destroyed North America

  • @TyrannyLoses,

    .

    Henry Kissinger:

    watch?v=aROay5kufxc

    .

    Context is a bitch, ain't it?

    It is also lost on this youtuber (see above reference) who heard the word "New World Order" and immediately associated it with taking over the world, secret societies, private meetings (Bilderberg) and so on. He is so alienated.

    .

    Oh, wait! Did I say "alienated"? That does not mean I imply he is a secret lizard alien taking over the world secretly implanting michrochips! See: watch?v=xFpes9qWMj4

  • @wimahlers

    Henry Kissinger : "Military men are dumb, stupid animals to be used for foreign policy."

    You want to challenge me? There are a couple options

    1. It's your job to spread disinformation (That would make you a wart on society's ass)

    2. You don't have a clue what you're talking about

    3. You're too scared to face reality cause you don't have the balls, however it's your children in the future who will bear the burden of your cowardice

    /watch?v=QEqFtVrAgSo

  • @TyrannyLoses,

    .

    Concerning your option 1, 2 and 3:

    Are you open to the option that there might even be more options?

  • @wimahlers Incase you're wondering I'm not trying to convince you of anything you're obviously just a paid shill or a hopelessly brainwashed fluoride damaged moron with no conception of history, ability to think critically or motivation to do so. I just enjoy seeing COWARDS like YOU who waste their precious time on this earth working against the fight for freedom. I just take satisfaction knowing that everyone who sees this knows why I say why I do and why you say what you do scum

  • @TyrannyLoses,

    .

    Just a tip:

    Some certainties you claim to have might be not so certain at all or may certainly sound fairly arrogant.

  • You can take your head out of your rear end now and wake up. Unless you want to live in a society where your child has a microchip in it and is "incapable of conceiving of itself an individual". If you think thats a joke understand the chip was ready in 2000, first the population had to be acclimatized through the CULTURE INDUSTRY. If you think this is a joke look up the US Airforces 2025 document describing how microchipped humans will be a REALITY OF LIFE THEN.

  • Why is the CFR important? Every President over the last hundred years has been a member of this private organization whose goal is the destruction of all sovreign nation states. You can find this in Tragedy and Hope by Professor Carrol Quigley, the HISTORIAN FOR THE CFR.

    You don't think there's a GLOBAL AGENDA? Maybe you should listen to the Dictator of the EU who in 2009 said "2009 marks the first year of GLOBAL GOVERNANCE WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE G20". GLOBAL. GOVERNANCE.

  • Rudkowski is a Patriot.

    Anyone braindead enough to believe that there isn't a GLOBAL AGENDA should do a little research.

    What is the Council on Foreign Relations? (CFR)

    It is a private organization that you cannot ask to join, you must be invited, and on it's website it tells you publicly that their GOAL IS WORLD GOVERNMENT. THAT MEANS THE END OF CANADA AND AMERICA AS SOVREIGN NATIONS FOR THE HARD OF THINKING. You do not live in a democracy

  • Luke Rudkowski is a thief...

  • What is more, we need to control the world. Our society depends on control. That is what makes us human ... for the better or the worse.

    Better in the sense that we are on top of everybodies food chain.

    Worse in the sense that we are rather careless with our world.

    To be more careful we need more control, not less.

    And I am optimistic. I think we will come to our senses and eventually co-operate and overcome our petty and silly and self-destructing protectionism mindset..

  • @wimahlers

    At best you are uninformed and ignorant, a perfect idealistic slave for the New World Order. What I say is based on documented historical fact, I quote the writings of the GLOBALISTS as they outline their AGENDA. What you say is based upon ignorance and fear. you don't know what you're talking about and it its too uncomfortable for you to address that.

    Enjoy living like a domesticated animal telling yourself theres no Global Agenda when the DICTATOR OF THE EU TELLS YOU THERE IS

  • And I repeat:

    .

    on the question "who" is controlling the world the answer is: NOBODY!

    .

    There is not a single person, country, organization or corporation in control of the world. That is an illusion and sheer paranoia.

    There also is not a big plan to achieve some secret agenda. This simply is impossible in a dynamic world, our dynamic world.

  • furthermore, it is not me making the accusing claim of secret organizations having some secret agenda for taking over the world. Therefore I don't have to prove anything. Rudkowski is making such claims. That makes it his responsibility to prove the accusation not mine to prove the negative that there is no secret society trying to take over the world and control all of humanity.

  • @wimahlers I am simply saying that for you to out right deny that there isn't an agenda of any kind out there is insane. Any person in public office has an agenda. And for you to say that nobody has any control over the world is simply stupid. Money controls every aspect of society. Banks and financial institutions are in control of the money. I think you need to wake up. For you to try and convince the people on this page to believe your narrow minded thinking is a waste of your time.

  • @Jononutoob,

    .

    "I am simply saying that for you to out right deny that there isn't an agenda of any kind out there is insane."

    .

    Everybody and every organization has an agenda, a purpose, a goal.

    But such a generic remark is vague and meaningless.

    Now, again, what context of new world order are you referrring to. And what is so special about that that people like Rudkowski make special videos about it and shout sentences as "tell them about the new world order" ... or something similar.

  • @Jononutoob,

    .

    "And for you to say that nobody has any control over the world is simply stupid."

    .

    That is not what I said! Or to be clear:

    We all control the world and we all are responsible for controlling the world.

    .

    What I said was that there is not a single organization, group or secret society controlling the world. Nor is this possible in our dynamic world.

    Not even banks are controlling the world. If you don't believe me then just take a look at all bankrupted banks lately.

  • @wimahlers

    Small banks have failed and some larger financial institutions have failed. However the central banks are very profitable. Here is a title to a video that you may find interesting. "New World Order Quotes and Confessions" Watch this and more and you will see how "powerless" some small groups of people really are.

  • YES!!!!!

  • OH YEAH, BILL, YOU IS F-R-E-A-K-E-D- THE F-U-C-K OUTT.

    I can't beleive they make it so easy to have acess to these people, -WHAT THEY ACTUALLY GOT T THE THING IN THERE AND IT PLAYED AUDIO HAhahHahaha -

    - - I htink they want to start some shit. . .. . .

    CARROL QUIGLEyYyy ! ! !!

    ! !! ! !

  • lol loon

  • So Live.

  • When does Luke Rudkowski ever going to learn that the persons he "interviews" have nothing to hide but are simply annoyed by the ridiculous accusations he constantly spits around. He mistakes annoyance for conspiracy. Really sad, actually, basing your paranoid alternative reality on the annoyance of the one crudely pestered with paranoiac questions. Though no doubt he personally thinks that those questions are very intelligent of which the mainstream media is afraid to ask.

  • @wimahlers

    carol.

    fuckin'.

    quigley.

  • @Tailypoe777

    .

    Your remark, "carol fuckin' quigley", is a bit short on details. It also lacks relevance. So, please elaborate, be clear, and list accredited verifiable and verified sources only.

    And are you able to do so without referencing such an obvious conspiracy site like Alex Jones. Because I hardly consider infowars a credible and reliable verified or verifiable source.

  • @wimahlers

    When are you going to check your own grammar before passing judgments on others? The NWO is not a myth. It is a real thing. You want proof? Then use that little mouse and click some videos. I know many videos can be full of unverified information BUT the quotes, speeches, and excerpts cant be faked. When Bill Clinton, Bush Sr, and Gordon Brown all speak of the "New World Order" then how can you argue it is a myth made up by us paranoid kids? I couldn't make this up if I tried!

  • @Jononutoob, . You said: "When Bill Clinton, Bush Sr, and Gordon Brown all speak of the "New World Order" then how can you argue it is a myth made up by us paranoid kids? I couldn't make this up if I tried!" . indeed! . But in what CONTEXT do they refer to the new world order? Context is a bitch ain't it? . Regardless, what has this to do with 19 religious idiots destroying the WTC complex and partly destroying the Pentagon? Context is a bitch ain't it? So is relevance!
  • @wimahlers They used the New World Order to describe the future policies of the world's leaders. This is obvious IF you watched the video of them talking about it. Obviously you haven't or you wouldn't use context as some bullshit way of discrediting many people's beliefs. Also I don't know why you brought up 911 and relevance considering I never mentioned 911, terrorism, or the pentagon.

  • @Jononutoob,

    .

    You: "They used the New World Order to describe the future policies of the world's leaders."

    Me: Whow! That is a shocker. Politicians talking politics.

    .

    You: "Also I don't know why you brought up 911 and relevance considering I never mentioned 911, terrorism, or the pentagon."

    Me: No, you indeed didn't. But I was addressing Rudkowski. And he certainly does say and claim all that. He certainly claims a world wide conspiracy is responsible for 9/11. That is his core belief.

  • @wimahlers

    "Whow! That is a shocker. Politicians talking politics."

    Then why did you ask you arrogant jerk? I have tried to be civil but you continue to insult me. You bring up Rudkowski's beliefs on 911 and throw them at me. You ask for context on an issue that cant be in any other context other than world law and policy. Then you criticize me because the answer is what you expected. Are you going to keep attacking the answers I give you or are you going to say something worth hearing?

  • @Jononutoob,

    .

    "You ask for context on an issue that cant be in any other context other than world law and policy. "

    .

    Not true! And here is why:

    .

    I am all in favor for a new world order. Even strongly in favor. A new world order were every country is a democracy, conflicts are settled by discussion and voting in something like the United Nations. Where we all work together to solve over-population, over-consumption., global warming and the energy crisis without any religion. Context!

  • @wimahlers

    But a world of peace, discussion, etc, etc is still the same context which I told you. The manner in which nations interact internationally is still the context of world law and policy. When someone says "a New World Order" then there isnt much to misinterpret. I agree with you that a new way of global cooperation is fantastic. I support that 100%. However I want details about it. Who will control it? What has been done to achieve it? Are wars and other things a means to an end? etc

  • @Jononutoob,

    .

    You: "But a world of peace, discussion, etc, etc is still the same context which I told you"

    .

    So, no shocker there. And on the question "who" is contrtolling it the answer is: NOBODY!

    There is not a single person, country, organization or corporation in control of the world. That is an illusion and sheer paranoia.

    There also is not a big plan to achieve some secret agenda. This simply is impossible in a dynamic world, our dynamic world.

  • @wimahlers You say nobody. Then who and why is globalization real? Why was the UN, CFR, and other groups created if not to push some sort of agenda? Im not saying that there is some group magically controlling the world. What I am saying is that there are people with agendas. There has to be or progressives wouldnt exist. I think you drastically underrate the influence certain people hold on this planet. As an American citizen it is my right to have a say in what direction my nation goes in.

  • @Jononutoob,

    .

    You: "Then who and why is globalization real? Why was the UN, CFR, and other groups created if not to push some sort of agenda?"

    .

    You call the United Nations the new world order?

    Well, indeed it is! And happily so. Even though it is not perfect, many conflicts were solved as a result of the mere existence of the United Nations.

    But, again, the United Nations too is not controlled by any identifiable interest group. Unless you call the whole world "the" interest group.

  • @Jononutoob.

    .

    In addition, you also said:

    "When are you going to check your own grammar before passing judgments on others?"

    .

    What do you mean? You mean Rudkowski judging Bill Clintion, Bush Sr, and Gordon Brown all one time or the other having used the term "new world order" in a certain context? Now, that is indeed paranoid.

  • @wimahlers All i meant by that comment is that you shouldnt insult people with improper grammar. It is counter productive. Everything else you took from it is all your own making. You really should research it before arguing me over context.

  • @Jononutoob,

    .

    You accused: "All i meant by that comment is that you shouldnt insult people with improper grammar".

    .

    Me: I assume you mistake me from somebody else. As far as I can remember I have never crticized anybodies grammar.

    .

    You said: " You really should research it before arguing me over context."

    .

    Me: I read and researched. But I am not all knowing nor have I read everything. So please inform me which detail or context I have missed. With reference(s) please.

  • @wimahlers

    My dear lord!! You insulted Rudkowski using improper grammar. I didnt say Rudkowski used improper grammar. I said YOU did. You used improper grammar while insulting someone else. And like I said that is not a good idea.

  • @Jononutoob,

    .

    I called Rudkowski paranoid and sad (pathetic). That is not meant as an insult but, sure, you can take that as an insult. Concerning my grammar: English is not my native language. Anyway, improper grammar never is an argument, even if English was my native language. What counts is proof. And Rudkowski accuses a lot but has exactly zero proof of any conspiracy. And that is, justifiable, an act of paranoid behavior. But feel free to put forward a justifiable counter argument.

  • @wimahlers You call someone pathetic or paranoid then you say it isnt meant as an insult. That is like punching someone in the face then saying "oh well I didnt mean to insult you". Now you ask for a counter argument of a statement you made about Rudkowski? I am not him. If you want to argue his views then argue him! Again I am not Luke Rudkowksi.But I will say that there is proof. More than one politician is pushing a globalization agenda. Therefore by definition it is a conspiracy.

  • @Jononutoob,

    .

    You said: "Now you ask for a counter argument of a statement you made about Rudkowski? I am not him.".

    .

    Then why do you take what I say about Rudkowski personally? I observe he is paranoid. Here is a definition of paranoia:

    onelook. com/?w=paranoia&ls=a

    .

    And that is Rudkowski.

    That is, he has no proof whatsoever that there is a world wide conspiracy of which Clinton supposedly is a member to do harm and yet he is convinced of it. And that is paranoia.

  • @wimahlers

    You showed great sarcasm in your comment, "Whow! That is a shocker. Politicians talking politics." You also insulted my intelligence by saying context is a bitch isnt it. You said that as if I dont take context into account. You continue to say anyone who believes this is crazy or paranoid. i believe this and I am not paranoid. The NWO is a real idea. It is an agenda. The questions and suspicion is focused on the details of this agenda. No public official has gone in detail about it.

  • @Jononutoob,

    .

    You: "You said that as if I dont take context into account."

    .

    Indeed I did and indeed I still do. Again, what is the alleged program of the new world order, what is so shocking about it, or illegal or immoral about it and where is your proof for all that? Again, context is a bitch, ain't it? The reason why you react so violently is indeed because of my directness and the frustration that you don't have any proof, let alone details ... unless ... show me. Show me now.