9/11 & Directed Energy Weaponry: The Key Evidence pt.1/2

[cloggingthroats]

all of these people saying the planes were holograms, ya and all of the soldiers that we put into iraq were holograms too. the Iraq didn't know but they were just shooting at 40,000 holograms. idiots. get real people caught it on camera, one family caught the plane before it entered New York while filming a home video.

[mujaku]

@cloggingthroats Real or CGI, the planes are a red herring. The fact is, the official story doesn't fit with the evidence.

[mujaku]

I understand your angst. But this is just goofy:

"Lastly, if you melted down the steel used in the trade center..just one building, and had ONE SLAB of steel."

Your using the "if" word of a fiction. Thermate does not melt buildings including the concrete and the thousands of toilets and humans beings. It only cuts support columns. And the support columns were massive including the palisades. Pictures and video show supports columns turning into dust, along with everything else, not chunks!

[mujaku]

Clap your hands 110 times in under 10 seconds. So much for the pancake collapse theory by jet fuel. The seismic evidence for two massive buildings falling by way of demolition is not there. So much for the thermate hypothesis. Back to square one. How did WTC turn into fine dust?

[FreedumbFighter28]

@mujaku Thermate wouldnt leave the concusive effects you would find in a typical controlled demo. So much for you ignoring scientifically proven facts. Mark Basille has a demonstration involving the Thermitic dust igniting.....Judy wood has an experiment called...POOF which involves...well....nothing....­the experiment is to see if people by her shit if she just keeps repeating the same line of bull for 7 yrs....XD

[mujaku]

@FreedumbFighter28 No. Your wrong. Buy her book and start reading at page 332. In fact, begin reading at 321. If you can't buy her book - well, don't argue. You still ignore the main evidence against the "Thermitic hypothesis" - no significant debris (should have been over 3 storeys) relative to the mass of the WTC buildings and no seismic evidence relative the mass of the buildings collapsing.

[FreedumbFighter28]

@mujaku Thermitic hypothesis?? Have you read the papers? Have you watched the LIVE experiment. You can ya know....on YT even.

Im not wrong about anything. Have you heard a thermitic cutter charge? Hardly 1/2 the sound of RDX or C4.

Lastly, if you melted down the steel used in the trade center..just one building, and had ONE SLAB of steel...it would only be about 9 feet high, and the witdh and lentgh of the base of the building. Seriously....XD Woods is full of hot air

[mujaku]

@FreedumbFighter28 Total trash. Thermate has NEVER been used in a controlled demolition of a skyscraper. It is too difficult to fuse and far too slow. BTW, do you have the name of the company that makes the so-called "thermitic cutter charge" which is used in demolition?

[hashmonster2004]

judy wood is a complete fraud.

she cant explain her theory no matter who interviews her, shes a charlatan.

explosives and thermite brought down the towers .. check the evidence and not ramblings of a disinfo agent.

[jerichomutant]

Dr Judy wood is correct. Planes were holograms and cgi on tv. Missiles hit both WTC buildings and pentagon. fiberglass and aluminum planes do not leave road runner wing marks.

[cloggingthroats]

@jerichomutant really cause the only guy to catch it on his home video camera was the first plane. and it clearly showed it. he was filming a documentary and just happened to catch it. sorry your wrong. ppl like you hurt our case. get your fuckin facts straight or get the fuck out of america

[jerichomutant]

@cloggingthroats He just HAPPENED to catch it live? he was there to film it. You know how many of the 'witnesses' also have IMDB accounts? do some research. This was a giant Psyops.

[ALPHAandOMEGA44]

@jerichomutant Hey can you Private Message me the actors (if you have a list available) Thanks so much for the comments.

T

[cloggingthroats]

@jerichomutant he did not, and actually there is a many people who were randomly filming that day, one outside of new york who actually caught the plane flying over their house before it entered into new york and hit the towers. no hologram

[mujaku]

@cloggingthroats Total trash. Only one short clip exists of the first object hitting the tower. The second, on NBC video, shows an orb, roughly 39x17 feet - no 767 there. Dude, stop taking the blue pills.

[cloggingthroats]

@mujaku oh u got the footage? my aunt has footage of a plane while shooting home videos welllllll before the towers got it, about 5 minutes before. And yes, it was the same plane that flew over her house, and then roughly 5 min later into the towers

[mujaku]

@cloggingthroats Total trash - who care about some bloody plane 5 mins before. There is only ONE video that shows some kind of object hitting the first tower. It is very fuzzy. As for the second, there is NBC foots showing clearly a spherical object hitting the tower - no 767. A CGI 767 was superimposed over the spherical object to conceal it. This Richard D. Hall proves with his analysis at: watch?v=q4VQs57m4Sos

[cloggingthroats]

@jerichomutant filiming a home video of their kid and they went up to catch the plane

[cloggingthroats]

@cloggingthroats they were playing t-ball. she was filming from the deck. If you dont know dont assume. There was 1 real plane, no doubt. Ive seen it and have many copies as do many of my friends and family members

[redsoul888]

Directed energy weapons are taking it to far. Why would we shoot it at ourselves? Someone clearly doesn't understand the secret war in space we're fighting. They thought we were stupid! Till we shot them in the ass and set it on fire.

[fhab525]

planes were holograms

[hashmonster2004]

@fhab525 dumbass ... no they were not.

dont base your conclusions on fuzzy low grade gifs downloaded from the internet.

its compression issues that make the stupid amongst us believe planes were appearing and disapearing

you thick piece of shit

[fhab525]

@hashmonster2004 u sound mad that the planes were holograms

[belowthepovertyline]

If you fired a bullet into a steel girder, it would bounce off. As a comparison to the WTC planes, this is spoken like someone who's never taken a physics course in his life. Hello, transfer of momentum, mv? Kinetic energy 1/2(mv^2)? Notice there are mass terms in there? What did you people expect was going to happen, the plane was going bounce off? Disintegrate? Any of you actually ask a physicist about this? I've heard NO arguments from scientists about that.

[footyclub1]

bang on...i allways tell the story of firing a bullet with a tungsten tip or a hollow alu pointless bullet

[yonexseven]

the rubble was just ground level .....should have been a pile hundreds of feet high

[Skeptic121]

You will have to demonstrate that what you claim happened is possible. We KNOW what thermite and thermate can do...there are hundreds of videos right here on YT. So set up a scale model, maybe dog house size. Use a small version of the weapon you claim brought down the towers and WTC7. Post the video! Problem: if the only videos are from the 1980s why can't you do it today?

[TheGoodThanks]

Shame on the NWO

[sinterminator]

It's getting more and more weird. I also heard that the planes were fake, like bluebeam projections or something. Later on I found that some chemtrail planes are fake as well... meaning... I don't know what to think about that... but like I said, it's getting more and more weird.

Greetings from Belgium, Europe.

[th86stone]

never seen the fuselage on the debris photos before, interesting

[hunterswine]

What ever took place the facts remain. All paper was unharmed yet parts of cars and whole buildings were turned to dust. This is indicative of a type of energy weapon. The reason the paper is untouched is because the energy is absorbed by the high density objects first. This is how steel and concrete are turned to dust in seconds but paper and other low density objects remain intact.

[rr93455]

@hunterswine I would suggest that most of the paper was incinerated, it has large surface area and low weight, and a large blast of air or explosives like nanothermite can push the paper efficiently. Evidence shows that ACE elevator company planted nanothermite sol-gels, or electric matches, remotely (i.e journal of 911 studies, and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth) these are the recent 2009-2010 findings. Not only that but i talked with survivor Janette Mckinley who sent Dr. Jones sample

[cheerdiver]

@rr93455 The "thermite" theory never existed until Dimitri Khalezov published his book and sent copies to congress. Though his dust data is very helpful, look at the highest spike. Aluminasilicate, aka zeolite, used at Chernobyl & Fukushima to absorb alpha and beta.

Here is the kicker, bed rock granite 72% Si2O2, 15% Al2O3. Guess what is produced using extreme temp like those in fission reaction?

Deutsche banks 1st dust analysis showed molybdenum spheres, only found in the steel req 4700 degF