what the hell? shouldn't the producer of this video know something is amiss when the sample video they put up is SIGNIFICANTLY crappy looking than the shots of the reviewer? epic fail of working with a NLE
Looks to me like you guys don't properly understand how to use the camera. Take a look at some of the Phillip Bloom videos to get a better feel of what the camera is actually capable of. You guys might want to brush up a bit on compression and rendering in post as well.
At the risk of being over critical, you guys should really compare the video clips here to any of dozens of others for the GH1 on YouTube. Your video looks horrible by comparison. Maybe there's a good reason that you'd like to explain?
what the hell? shouldn't the producer of this video know something is amiss when the sample video they put up is SIGNIFICANTLY crappy looking than the shots of the reviewer? epic fail of working with a NLE
booggerg 8 months ago
looks like shit
Nathancomplaining 1 year ago
this is awful.typical panasonic
becool2344 1 year ago
Sorry, guys, these videos are not sharp, you must have done something wrong. I fully agree with ourtvchannel's comment.
ipublica 1 year ago
Are they trying to put people OFF buying this camera? Awful footage.
BradMD69 1 year ago
this stuff is shit , don't waste our time!
0takeo0 2 years ago
then dont watch it you piece of shit.
Dune1884 1 year ago
this is pretty bad.
ive sen some incredible gh1 footage but this is bad
surroundedbyfuckwads 2 years ago 2
horrible quality video
if you wanna see amazing video from a amazing slr look at the HD video from the Canon T1i
cmanleyspy 2 years ago
not really, has no auto focus and 20 fps in 1080p cause lag, 720p okay but no mic and mono sound just make half of the experience.
mugupo10 2 years ago
This must be joke, I have a GH1 and I don't know how you'd take a video as awful as this. If I was panasonic I wouldn't let you near my cameras.
ourtvchannel 2 years ago 10
@ourtvchannel preproduction model.... hmmm ... also youtube compression doesn't help :/
ogatobranco 2 years ago
This is terrible movie. It surely doesnt show GH1 potential . We can see a lot of terrific good videos from GH1 right here on Yt or Vimeo....
At least the pics are good enough..
labalbi 2 years ago 12
Looks to me like you guys don't properly understand how to use the camera. Take a look at some of the Phillip Bloom videos to get a better feel of what the camera is actually capable of. You guys might want to brush up a bit on compression and rendering in post as well.
Skapo 2 years ago 2
At the risk of being over critical, you guys should really compare the video clips here to any of dozens of others for the GH1 on YouTube. Your video looks horrible by comparison. Maybe there's a good reason that you'd like to explain?
CrustyCurmudgeon 2 years ago 4
right said crus maybe they compress it too much before upload
vittogol 2 years ago
the zoom in video (while recording) mode looks pretty shaky. user error? the zooming in on the ferris wheel footage looks kind of crappy.
joshsteinbauer 2 years ago
I hope i'm seeing a youtube bug, because the HD video here is scarcely better than plain ole youtube video.
SaganAppreciationSoc 2 years ago 4
The video is not a patch on the 5DMk2
hizento 2 years ago
therefore it's worth 1/5 of it's price
EASala 2 years ago 2
its half the price and twice the spec, oh and its a third smaller.
mamboleckie 2 years ago
watch philip bloom's videos with the gh1..its much more stunning...im definitely getting this baby,,
Kalees 2 years ago 2
is the picture quality still as good as the g1??
and is this as good as a canon 500d???
i realy want a dslr wiv hd video and awesome picture quality, cheers
martinn180 2 years ago
The GH1 technically isn't a SLR, just changeable lenses.
This camera's really caught my eye, as has the Pentax K-7.
demolitionbmxd 2 years ago
Pentax K-7 perhaps
xoio 2 years ago
Nice - I like the ability to control depth of field in HD mode. Worth every penny.
modernfilms 2 years ago
2:22>>>>>flying rod XD
mikess 2 years ago
I think this pre-production model does under exposure. Video is dark. and so are the pictures.
IS it true, does it under expose with all the time?
I mean this pre release version
mahamza86 2 years ago
It is definitely not worth $1500. maybe $700 at max.
LTF85199 2 years ago
how much is it?
GlockNinja 2 years ago
£1299.99 with 14-140mm
WhatDigitalCamera 2 years ago
Holy smocky! £1299.99!? I wish i had enough to buy it :D
DeepeeMe 2 years ago
Why on earth you cant say £1300? :D
temppazi 2 years ago
Because you cant say: Why on Earth cant you say £1300?
XD
DeepeeMe 2 years ago
But if you say £ 1300 and thats it?
temppazi 2 years ago
This camera is NOT worth that much!!!!!
The new Pentax is better, and cheaper!
Or at least it seems so, i know Pentax are very very sharp, and Panasonic is new to the game.
timmyguy13 2 years ago
canon 5dmk2 looks better
magix93 2 years ago