Added: 11 months ago
From: UTubekookdetector
Views: 324
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This political lecture could be so much the more better if the speaker wasn't constantly insulting Cathy Zoi with such abusive epithets. We all get emotional in discussing political and social issues but there is no reason to get verbally abusive.

  • RJG: I could've said a lot worse, of course my scorn is righteous scorn when one looks at what she wants to do to people. She's a nanny-statist envirokook who wants to regulate your life into oblivion. I don't care for that and neither should you. I also jabbed Bush & the GOP, are you going to critique me for that as well?

  • @UTubekookdetector No, by no means. I dislike Dubya and I also hate Public Citizen, Fund for the Public Interest and the PIRGs so I do not disagree with you as this dingbat being a nanny statist and envirokook but, to be honest with you, I always felt the Obama Administration was a much better step than his predecessor.

  • MANBEAR: The N. Hem. cooled from 1958-78, yet CO2 levels didn't go down. Even temp readings in the troposphere since 1978 aren't markely up. Most of the warming is confined to the N. Hem & especially the Arctic. Funny how the ecokooks never think other factors (heat loss through the atmosphere, albedo due to less/more cloud cover, natural carbon sequestering) could influence changes in climate.

  • I should inform everyone that CHECKYOURSOURCES was banned from my channel because he has comment approval up (which is ok) but didn't allow 4 of my rebuttals to appear on his page. He seems to demand equal time on others' vids & channels, but doesn't allow the same on his channel. For that, he was banned.

  • You appear to have confused your dislike of a policy with the science itself, while you clearly dislike the policies that resulted from science why do you dishonestly attack the science itself rather than just admit you hate the policy and come up with a better one. Please indicate or state a more likely explanation than Anthropogenic global warming for the majority of recent warming since the 1970's?

  • CHECK: You seem to be confused, AGW wasn't a topic in this video, but the energy efficient mandates spawned by such a paradigm. Would you like to comment on how those energy-efficient mandates from Washington have fared? If you have a question for me on AGW, find a vid of mine that specifically focuses on it OR post it on my channel. I posted on this kid's channel months ago (he has comment approval) and days later my comments still were NOT visible.

  • @UTubekookdetector So to clarify that your views (so we know if you think the policies are at fault or the science) are you saying that Anthropogenic global warming is the best explanation for the majority of recent warming since the 1970's or not?

  • CHECK: Stay on topic moron, I'm not going to tell you again. You have 2 choices on this vid (or you can post on my channel and then I can reply on your channel where you'll let my comment languish in comment-approval purgatory for a week): 1) Agree with my contention that goverment-efficiency mandates for appliances are a complete failure 2) Disagree & defend your belief.

  • great video

  • I threw out my Federal Government authorized 1.6 gallon a flush toilet than retrofitted a WW2 era 7 gallon a flush model no more problems.

  • ATHENA: Good call & you didn't need some Neanderthal in Washington to help you fix your problem. They are coming out with controlled-flush toilets which will allow you to "low-flush" when the only waste is liquid, but have a normal flush button for solid waste. Those will work much better than the "low-flush only" toilets that San Francisco has to deal with.

  • @UTubekookdetector Californians one size fits all solutions are not limited to Washington.The state legislators out here on the left coast in there infinite wisdom have outlawed incandescent light bulbs. I started raising poultry as a hobby when I was 15. I use the incandescent bulbs for heat to keep the baby chicks warm the new florescent light bulbs don't generate enough heat to keep the chicks warm.

  • ATHENA: I need to do a vid on those CFL bulbs. Full of mercury (very dangerous if broken), prone to short-cycling when they're not left on for an extended period of time, they don't last as long as advertised, the lighting isn't as aesthetically-appealing and they're much more expensive than the good old incandescent. Jim DeMint is trying to reverse the incandescent ban.

  • @UTubekookdetector My four year old son has an obsession with light bulbs all bulbs incandescent,florescent, automotive, light emitting diodes. He plays with the light bulbs till they break.My house is contaminated with mercury from the liberal light bulbs breaking.Does Al Gore offer a unintended consequences mop up crew?

  • ATHENA: These clowns don't care about consequences, they just want to do "something" even if it is counterproductive in the long run. Keep those CFLs away from your son, they are very harmful.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more