I must be to conditioned to the four dimensions(length, width, height, time) because this video didn't make any sense to me. The ant doesn't live in a 3 dimensions(length, width, time) world because the ant can still recognize the fourth dimension (height.) It's just in a smaller proportion then the way I see the word (length, width, height, time.)
Ant see = (length, width, height, time) --> smaller proportion
I see = (length, width, height, time) ---> larger proportion
@romanjcg That isn't true. Infinity isn't a concrete object, it's a concept. For instance, in mathematics, we use "infinity" as another way of saying "I can always just add another zero, and it's still a valid number". To us, the universe appears infinite because it wraps around dimensions we can't see. However, this "infinite" universe is simply a single point in the 7th dimension, which we are physically unable to perceive. It's a bit abstract, but it does make sense.
@metsfan92286 I agree with what you are saying metsfan, especially when you said, "the universe appears infinite" if it only appears infinite and is not infinite then we should choose another word to describe it like, "really big". Unfortunately the word infinite means containing all. If our universe is infinite then there is only one universe. Can our universe contain different dimensions within it? Of course. I agree with this video up until about the 6th or 7th Dimension.
The thing that I get hooked up on is the single point of impossible size and shape. If it is a spot of space or mass then what is it made up of? It is just an imaginary concept. But every dimension is made up of these series of impossible spots using the dimension before it but how do you start this spot that can not possibly be made of anything?
@playalover23 You are sounding like a flatlander right now. When you say "a point in space" you are thinking a point in 3 dimensional space, but that is just the point, there are more than 3 dimensions. What he is describing is a point in other dimensions. Essentially what he is saying is that this single point, which seems to be of impossible size TO US because that's all we are able to perceive it as, is simply a single point in another dimension we can't perceive, only imagine.
@metsfan92286 I think he is talking about the first single point mentioned in the video -- the first dimension. We should be able to imagine it since the third dimension we exist in includes the two former dimensions. His question is that if the following dimensions that are single points are made of the things existing in the dimensions before them, then what makes up the first (single point) dimension? Presumably nothing, but that's like adding 0 to 0 and getting a natural number.
@playalover23 Why it's wonderfully simple. The single point of indeterminate size - is the 10th dimension.
10th dimension being the sum of all
1st point being nothing
But in a system, we can deduce that there is no such thing as 'nothing' and instead it would be 'every thing/infinite' instead. The reason there's this confusion is because the video explained it in a bi-polar dualistic way. When that's not how the universe is made up, the universe is self-similar (fractals). 10 = 1.
imagine being able to tap into the 5th and 6th dimension. man, i would see the so many different things I would've been if I didn't change my life's path every-so-often 0_0
I know this will be an unpopular opinion here, but I don't think dimensions actually exist. I think they're just a concept we've come up with for explaining space and time. We use the "2 dimensional being" concept to explain how higher dimensions look to beings in lower dimensions, but here's the rub: 2-dimensional beings don't exist. 2-dimensional would just be imaginary. What makes anyone think higher dimensions aren't just imaginary too? I know it's just theory, so why give it such credence?
@highrollin2 Be careful when using the term "theory". A theory is not a hypothesis. The theory of relativity is not something that hasn't been proven yet. It is one of the most proven facts in the history of science. Only quantum physics has more experimental evidence. Theory describes what is real and makes mathematical verification of what experimental results tell us. For something to graduate from hypothesis to theory it must be validated in the lab.
I'm an atheist, but I have to say: watching this video, I now understand the tendancy a lot of people have to look at science and just say, "Ah, fuck it... God did it. That's good enough for me."
@valvarexart I agree, its a huge differenance to say "this is what something may possibly be, although it may be completly wrong" and "this is what something is". Everything above 4 demensions is based on nothing more than speculation and assumptions, and absolutly zero fact... Absolutly nothing presented from the 5th demension on has been tested studied or is even understood! All of this speculation is created on our experiance in this dimension...
at about 04:55 he says something that is heavily biased upon certain theories. He implies that there can be different futures, although this has never been proven. In fact, there are many, like me, who do not believe that we have free choice or that a random factor exists. I believe everything that happens in the future is as a strict and linear consequence of what has happened in the past and there can be no branchings. Reply if you want further explanation or discussion.
So here's what is not being understood... All possibilities are held in the first infinity...
What this means is.. We look to other Galaxies and as far can be determined they are all their own big bangs that could have different environments than our own Galaxy. There is no reason to assume that our Galaxy exists in a universe.. More to the point every galaxy is a universe.
Technically we can only see 2 dimensions, and flat landers would see 1 dimensions. This video makes lots of wild claims that aren't supported by scientific data. I think it's really interesting-- I wish it were better supported. It simply isn't scientific. It gives a hypothesis without supporting evidence.
@supersecretroom look up string theory. this video is a very simplified explanation of string theory. unfortunately string theory is purely mathematical and cant be experimentally proven.
7:29- everything after the big bang was nothing but chemical reactions so only one timeline can naturally occur unless intelligent life (us in a million years, ex.) goes back across the 4th dimension and meddles with the first few thousand years of the universe. There can only be one end for the universe (simply a straight line in 4d) unless 3d beings travel in the 4th dimension and alter the original chemical composition of the universe, hence likely erasing themselves from existence
I HAVE A QUESTION! At the beginning he is telling me that there is a point, imaginary- with no dimension. Then he goes on to say that the point indicates a position... Well okay if the point indicates a position then it has to either be in a dimension itself or it is a dimension. It cant be something and nothing at the same time. If it is nothing then everything else is nothing, if it is something everything else has to be 1 dimension more because it is already a dimension its self?
@Yonggbaek Not necessarily. Imaginary things are part of a dimension. Thought is part and parcel of a dimension. And things do exists and not exist at the same time. It's all conceptual.
@Yonggbaek a point only makes sense when applied in a dimension. A point in 1d has 1 coordinate of information, in 2d it has two coordinates, in 3d it has three, and so on. It is an imaginary construct to represent a specific position in a dimensional space. A point without any dimension is of no use at all.
the 4th being time but time is argued not to be a actual dimension. space and time could go on endlessly in all directions just like light. if all things are possible then time does not just go forward and backwards but in all directions like light making the 4th dimension a solid dimension I need emails on this richardschorriii@gmail.com I tried to join his forum to get a response but didn't see where
this is ridiculous. everything on earth has a width, even a line. so everything is 3D. i dont understand the ant as a 2D creatute. ants are 3D. imagine this, imagine, that. c'mon. he even says an 'impossibly flat playing card'. so what is he saying exactly? imagine impossibility? OK! i can imagine it, but it's absurd.
@slavek20 Remember when he says you have to imagine that all in one dot to create a higher dimension? Well since we see in 3D, we also have length width and depth, but he is talking about an ant that sees in 2D, only length and width.
I have a theory on the edge of the universe and where its at. OK so if in the second dimension a flatlander can travel across a third dimensional surface and feel as if its going straight when its actually curving across a dimension it can't perceive, then what if the universe has an edge, but like the flatlander we don't move in the dimension that would get us out of the universe. So the edge of the universe would be in the 7th dimension.
i think its hilarious that quantum physicists think they understand all the unknown dimensions of the universe yet we cant even travel out of our microscopic solar system; we dont understand 99% of the scientific phenomena on planet earth, aka "3rd" dimension, let alone the other "9" dimensions. how can we possibly understand any other dimension if we don't fully understand our own? my quantum physics class in college was neat but a bunch of theoretical hooplah.
String Theory IS NOT the same thing as the Multi-verse theory.
String Theory is the study of multiple dimensions tightly bound at a sub-quantum level. The Multi-verse theory is a belief in separate, parallel universes which are produced through quantum collisions, where the relay is determined by probability rather than Newtonian physics. A lot of people believe that a different dimension is a different universe, but they're far from being the same.
If you can't have the eleventh dimension because you can't have more than one collection of all possible timelines for all of the possible universes, then why are there two videos about the eleventh dimension in the related videos?
Would the eleventh dimension be a line joining two points in the tenth dimension? If so then a eleventh dimension shouldn't be possible right? You would need two points in the tenth dimension, which isn't possible because one point is already EVERYTHING ever possible.
@InfernalArms22 You realize that an atom is 3-dimensional. If everything possible happens on a POINT in the tenth dimension you can't get any smaller than that.
Is it possible that two of these dimensions like the third dimension and the 7th dimension could randomly intersect each other in a random location causing us to see what would be their or what was their? My Email is Spencerlacour@yahoo.com
@JKJ1900 not exactly, they are just contained within the tenth dimension. Each. Infinity is stll infinitely large, namely because of the presence of time, which opens up more infinities each second.
when explaining the 4th dimension he mentions if we were to see ourselves we would see a long string life from embryo to death. I was pondering this and wondered why would the string "image" stop at death does it cease to exist after we loose consciousness? Could the timeline not extend to when we rot in the ground and possibly fertilize a plant and see that plant die or feed a bird and what not? If this is not possible why does the 4th dimension "string" cease to exist when we die
@greenpez198 I think if we cant comprehend the beginning of the universe then it must have always existed. Energy can not be created nor destroyed and something must have caused us to be here. As you can see in the video if you were to fold a piece of paper in circle, that represents a complete timeline of your life cycle. And thats just what it is. A cycle.
Even if someone did have a scientific reason for the start of the universe, we could still ask the same question... "what caused that?" Therefore the cause is its effect and the cycle goes on infinately.
@tphill1000 No, it doesn't. Before the universe existed, there was no time. No time, no cause and effect. Therefore, the universe does not need a cause. Well, I'm paraphrasing Stephen Hawking on that one.
According to String Theory there are multiple universes and multiple dimensions
According to a concept known as an "infinite causality loop" there is no beginning and no end to existence because everything is related through energy
Therefore our existence in this 3rd dimension could technically cause our own reality by setting off a chain of events that leads to the beginning of this particular time and space.
Other dimensional beings could be the alternate versions of us
@buffboynick String theory only proclaims that multiple dimensions can exist, not that they have to exist. String theory is mathematics that started in attempts to describe experiments of inelastic scattering. It lost out to quark theory.
@greenpez198 yeah I think technically since that line goes to infinite in both directions and possibly in all directions it would go from the begging to the end of the atoms (or smaller) that make you you and seeing the 4th dimension would include seeing all possibilties for you
Perception. It is because he is explaining the dimensions based upon our perception of those dimensions. Because we are not alive to perceive our experience of a dimension beyond our death, he does not include the duration of any additional benefit or detriment to life around us. If we assumed that our "time" line extends beyond our death, we could argue that that line could continue infinitely since the atoms that were once "us'" would still exist and be re-purposed indefinitely.
@greenpez198 the theory itself is very interesting. however you bring up a great point.his example however was a metaphor. he said the 4th dimension was Duration or Time. it could be a "string" but it would be a string from the beginning of time to the end of the universe. possibly never ending. however most scientists agree that the universe is made up of space time and matter. at the end of the universe. it is possible that time itself will end.
@KuppinCasual suppose we believe in the multiverse. could time end for one universe and not another? could there be a higher dimension of time in 4d hyperspace outside the universe around us? because i'm just thinking about a question like if the time in the universe ends does that mean that time in hyperspace ends too?
@brandeezy108 yes, time could end for one and not another. suppose we believe in the multiverse theory why would they have to synchronize times. A higher dimension of time? possibly, but I doubt it. I do think however that the universe is made up of Matter, Space, and Time. to lose one is to not have a universe.
@buffboynick Please note that when you write something on a thread, it might be marked as spam, this seems to happen a lot to you. The last bit makes you sound like a fundamentalist egomaniacal retard.
@buffboynick Where is this website? I looked up "world renown scientist" and I got "world renowned scientist".
Oh, you might win this one, I'll give you a flying chance, as I'll admit I know very little about string theory.
A superstring expert like yourself should find this very simple:
Take an Euclidean vector space of eleven dimensions, a vector emanating from the origin has eleven equal components of one unit. What is the length of this vector?
@buffboynick Well, if you have kids, I would avoid helping them with their maths homework, they will end up as mathematically retarded as yourself. Get me to teach them instead, with any luck they might manage to solve Riemann's Hypothesis (If it is actually possible to prove it).
yea we watched this in Philosophy class today... basically everyone is calling it a mindfuckery.... lol I mostly understand it I think... I'll watch it a again a few times lol XD
I must be to conditioned to the four dimensions(length, width, height, time) because this video didn't make any sense to me. The ant doesn't live in a 3 dimensions(length, width, time) world because the ant can still recognize the fourth dimension (height.) It's just in a smaller proportion then the way I see the word (length, width, height, time.)
Ant see = (length, width, height, time) --> smaller proportion
I see = (length, width, height, time) ---> larger proportion
I dont get it.
twn5858 1 day ago
Maybe when we are in heaven, we are in tenth dimension. We could ask anything we want.
011azr 2 days ago
if you can use a computer or paper, you should know what's 2d ;) just kidding. nice vid.
rinkavideos64 6 days ago
:) :)
TheSeensca 1 week ago
45 people are big bang theorists
Fleishman322 1 week ago
wait.. so does this mean im dead in another dimension?
chelalo99 2 weeks ago
I'm not sure why posibilities are considered a dimension, let alone serveral. This video didn't work my grey matter.
Interesting video though.
doghous3 2 weeks ago
There can only be one infinity. By definition. Nice try though. ;-)
romanjcg 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
metsfan92286 2 weeks ago
@romanjcg That isn't true. Infinity isn't a concrete object, it's a concept. For instance, in mathematics, we use "infinity" as another way of saying "I can always just add another zero, and it's still a valid number". To us, the universe appears infinite because it wraps around dimensions we can't see. However, this "infinite" universe is simply a single point in the 7th dimension, which we are physically unable to perceive. It's a bit abstract, but it does make sense.
metsfan92286 2 weeks ago
@metsfan92286 I agree with what you are saying metsfan, especially when you said, "the universe appears infinite" if it only appears infinite and is not infinite then we should choose another word to describe it like, "really big". Unfortunately the word infinite means containing all. If our universe is infinite then there is only one universe. Can our universe contain different dimensions within it? Of course. I agree with this video up until about the 6th or 7th Dimension.
romanjcg 2 weeks ago
The thing that I get hooked up on is the single point of impossible size and shape. If it is a spot of space or mass then what is it made up of? It is just an imaginary concept. But every dimension is made up of these series of impossible spots using the dimension before it but how do you start this spot that can not possibly be made of anything?
playalover23 2 weeks ago
@playalover23 You are sounding like a flatlander right now. When you say "a point in space" you are thinking a point in 3 dimensional space, but that is just the point, there are more than 3 dimensions. What he is describing is a point in other dimensions. Essentially what he is saying is that this single point, which seems to be of impossible size TO US because that's all we are able to perceive it as, is simply a single point in another dimension we can't perceive, only imagine.
metsfan92286 2 weeks ago
@metsfan92286 I think he is talking about the first single point mentioned in the video -- the first dimension. We should be able to imagine it since the third dimension we exist in includes the two former dimensions. His question is that if the following dimensions that are single points are made of the things existing in the dimensions before them, then what makes up the first (single point) dimension? Presumably nothing, but that's like adding 0 to 0 and getting a natural number.
TheZookyDragon 2 weeks ago
@playalover23 Oh geez, that's a good point!
TheZookyDragon 2 weeks ago
@playalover23 Why it's wonderfully simple. The single point of indeterminate size - is the 10th dimension.
10th dimension being the sum of all
1st point being nothing
But in a system, we can deduce that there is no such thing as 'nothing' and instead it would be 'every thing/infinite' instead. The reason there's this confusion is because the video explained it in a bi-polar dualistic way. When that's not how the universe is made up, the universe is self-similar (fractals). 10 = 1.
0fleetfeet0 1 week ago
This isn't on google maps.
LuhpsMcdaggen 2 weeks ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
You are now entering, The Twilight Zone.
dman3600 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
dman3600 3 weeks ago
howed i get here from LilDeuceDeuce
PocketKandy 3 weeks ago
holy shit, i should not have watched this while stoned, mind fucked in the ass
DTPsadus 3 weeks ago
It may be fast for some but its straight forward, there's kind of a pattern.
ridiculusstimulus 3 weeks ago
How do you have strings in the tenth dimension if it is a single point? Shouldnt they be in the ninth dimension?
Morophin3 3 weeks ago in playlist Liked videos
my mind has been raped in the 5th deminsion... :O
byoknippa 3 weeks ago
This video completely eliminates the need for smoking weed. Don't do drugs, do physics; it's much more of a trip!
MateiAlexandruBogdan 3 weeks ago
MINDFUCKED!!
mohawk120 1 month ago
imagine being able to tap into the 5th and 6th dimension. man, i would see the so many different things I would've been if I didn't change my life's path every-so-often 0_0
thecoolloser90 1 month ago
i love over analyzing things like this
777LexTalionis777 1 month ago
i think this video just raped my mined. It could be possible in one of these dimension!
TheJman1121 1 month ago
Mind Raped
TheOmenOfficial 1 month ago
I know this will be an unpopular opinion here, but I don't think dimensions actually exist. I think they're just a concept we've come up with for explaining space and time. We use the "2 dimensional being" concept to explain how higher dimensions look to beings in lower dimensions, but here's the rub: 2-dimensional beings don't exist. 2-dimensional would just be imaginary. What makes anyone think higher dimensions aren't just imaginary too? I know it's just theory, so why give it such credence?
highrollin2 1 month ago
@highrollin2 Be careful when using the term "theory". A theory is not a hypothesis. The theory of relativity is not something that hasn't been proven yet. It is one of the most proven facts in the history of science. Only quantum physics has more experimental evidence. Theory describes what is real and makes mathematical verification of what experimental results tell us. For something to graduate from hypothesis to theory it must be validated in the lab.
drakeequation521 1 month ago
I'm an atheist, but I have to say: watching this video, I now understand the tendancy a lot of people have to look at science and just say, "Ah, fuck it... God did it. That's good enough for me."
highrollin2 1 month ago 3
@highrollin2 Its why I'm an agnostic. :)
dwcai81 1 month ago
My mind has been fucked from both sides!!!
6Recrucify6Jesus6 1 month ago
There's an arrow in my knee in the 5th dimension.
Mitchysavestheworld 1 month ago
Mined Fucked!
PhenomenomProduction 1 month ago
owwwww my head
brinkmannmarv 1 month ago
I fucking love being a nerd.
nikker1985 1 month ago
I used to watch videos in 480, 720, and 1080p then I took an arrow to the knee.
TheDrrp 1 month ago
Furthermore... this is sooo easy to marturbate to!
And I still have no arrow in the knee in this point of 3rd dimension.
galenlynore 1 month ago
@galenlynore Wonderful comment.
xohearts16 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@xohearts16 thanks =) you can use it if you like
galenlynore 1 month ago
we got to the tenth dimension using our logic. We would go beyond, but only if we imagine another dot... of other kind of logic.
galenlynore 1 month ago
Actually I disagree with most of this video. From about the fifth dimension he goes into bullshit/speculation mode.
valvarexart 1 month ago
@valvarexart I agree, its a huge differenance to say "this is what something may possibly be, although it may be completly wrong" and "this is what something is". Everything above 4 demensions is based on nothing more than speculation and assumptions, and absolutly zero fact... Absolutly nothing presented from the 5th demension on has been tested studied or is even understood! All of this speculation is created on our experiance in this dimension...
muzzachillin1987 1 month ago
at about 04:55 he says something that is heavily biased upon certain theories. He implies that there can be different futures, although this has never been proven. In fact, there are many, like me, who do not believe that we have free choice or that a random factor exists. I believe everything that happens in the future is as a strict and linear consequence of what has happened in the past and there can be no branchings. Reply if you want further explanation or discussion.
valvarexart 1 month ago
@valvarexart i have existed therefore i will always exist
vthammerman 1 month ago
So here's what is not being understood... All possibilities are held in the first infinity...
What this means is.. We look to other Galaxies and as far can be determined they are all their own big bangs that could have different environments than our own Galaxy. There is no reason to assume that our Galaxy exists in a universe.. More to the point every galaxy is a universe.
watchingobserversee 2 months ago
ARGH!!! MY BRAIN IS F**CKED!!!
Guymanguy12345 2 months ago
Technically we can only see 2 dimensions, and flat landers would see 1 dimensions. This video makes lots of wild claims that aren't supported by scientific data. I think it's really interesting-- I wish it were better supported. It simply isn't scientific. It gives a hypothesis without supporting evidence.
supersecretroom 2 months ago
@supersecretroom quantum physics/mechanics is a theory.
davidfunk135 2 months ago
@davidfunk135 its a theory that is used in engineering so it has been experimentally verified and applied to technology.
redpillreality 1 month ago
@supersecretroom look up string theory. this video is a very simplified explanation of string theory. unfortunately string theory is purely mathematical and cant be experimentally proven.
redpillreality 1 month ago
7:29- everything after the big bang was nothing but chemical reactions so only one timeline can naturally occur unless intelligent life (us in a million years, ex.) goes back across the 4th dimension and meddles with the first few thousand years of the universe. There can only be one end for the universe (simply a straight line in 4d) unless 3d beings travel in the 4th dimension and alter the original chemical composition of the universe, hence likely erasing themselves from existence
chilton98 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
i'm way too high for this
submergedchase 2 months ago 2
I HAVE A QUESTION! At the beginning he is telling me that there is a point, imaginary- with no dimension. Then he goes on to say that the point indicates a position... Well okay if the point indicates a position then it has to either be in a dimension itself or it is a dimension. It cant be something and nothing at the same time. If it is nothing then everything else is nothing, if it is something everything else has to be 1 dimension more because it is already a dimension its self?
Yonggbaek 2 months ago 3
@Yonggbaek Not necessarily. Imaginary things are part of a dimension. Thought is part and parcel of a dimension. And things do exists and not exist at the same time. It's all conceptual.
LadyZeppelin1960 2 months ago
@Yonggbaek a point only makes sense when applied in a dimension. A point in 1d has 1 coordinate of information, in 2d it has two coordinates, in 3d it has three, and so on. It is an imaginary construct to represent a specific position in a dimensional space. A point without any dimension is of no use at all.
LKRaider 2 months ago
2:31 - 2:34
Now you're thinking with Portals.
Reilley302 2 months ago 2
@Reilley302 YES
xohearts16 1 month ago
very cool and thought provoking
thatblondechickkk 2 months ago
Reminds me of the book Hyperspace...the author talked about Flatlanders too.
mycrazyangel27 2 months ago
I have an perfect explanation for this but it's ten paragraphs long :| if anyone is interested msg me and i'll explain it.
14Infernos88Dragon 3 months ago
@14Infernos88Dragon I think I want it.
caroemperhazy 2 months ago
This just makes me want to do DMT :(
Squid702 3 months ago 29
now my head hurts....
edgilchrist 3 months ago
Want to see the 4th dimension? DMT.
Mosixman 4 months ago
i Dont get it...
ElBjarnos 4 months ago
@ElBjarnos it's explained pretty simply man, try watching it again
ClearlyBlazed 4 months ago
@ElBjarnos try drugs
iWentToNam 3 months ago
@iWentToNam
If Weed Is Enough, I Still Don't get it!!
ElBjarnos 3 months ago
@ElBjarnos I got it and I am sober.
14Infernos88Dragon 3 months ago
@14Infernos88Dragon
Yh but i'm not 1 of the smartest :p
ElBjarnos 3 months ago
@ElBjarnos Not everyone is, Would you like for me to explain it to you in inbox?
14Infernos88Dragon 3 months ago
@14Infernos88Dragon
NH i thinks its funny to see if u dont get it XD
ElBjarnos 3 months ago
Nh I like not getting it.. cause that's funnier XD
ElBjarnos 3 months ago
@ElBjarnos How is it funny you don't understand something that is true and can happen with enough spiritual enlightenment?
14Infernos88Dragon 3 months ago
@14Infernos88Dragon There are only 4 dimensions XD
So i Don't care if there are people who think there are 10 dimensions XD
And I dont get it but i dont care XD
ElBjarnos 3 months ago
Are we ready for Paradox Mathematics.
nikokensho 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the 4th being time but time is argued not to be a actual dimension. space and time could go on endlessly in all directions just like light. if all things are possible then time does not just go forward and backwards but in all directions like light making the 4th dimension a solid dimension I need emails on this richardschorriii@gmail.com I tried to join his forum to get a response but didn't see where
richardschorriii 4 months ago
Hehehe awesome. These conversations are what I was Looking for. I need more friend who understand this.
Vsevolodvladislav 4 months ago
Why are the first 3 dimensions spatial while the others represent different variables?
M3t4lManiac 5 months ago
this is ridiculous. everything on earth has a width, even a line. so everything is 3D. i dont understand the ant as a 2D creatute. ants are 3D. imagine this, imagine, that. c'mon. he even says an 'impossibly flat playing card'. so what is he saying exactly? imagine impossibility? OK! i can imagine it, but it's absurd.
slavek20 5 months ago
@slavek20 Remember when he says you have to imagine that all in one dot to create a higher dimension? Well since we see in 3D, we also have length width and depth, but he is talking about an ant that sees in 2D, only length and width.
Thomasdg2 5 months ago
Dude, imagine watching this when you're blazed; that would be un-fucking-real.
FoxeyHound 5 months ago
read slaughterhouse-five and learn about the 4th dimension from the Tralfamadorians
wasabirock 5 months ago
WHAT. THE. FUCK.
obviouslyfakeaccount 5 months ago
I don't really get the deep meaning of this.
Anyway in my opinion, tenth dimension is everything... and nothing at the same time.
AkMachx 5 months ago
I have a theory on the edge of the universe and where its at. OK so if in the second dimension a flatlander can travel across a third dimensional surface and feel as if its going straight when its actually curving across a dimension it can't perceive, then what if the universe has an edge, but like the flatlander we don't move in the dimension that would get us out of the universe. So the edge of the universe would be in the 7th dimension.
puroboriqua13 5 months ago
I got to be the first reaction to this interesting clip and picked incredible because that's what it is
SilverJay47 5 months ago
i think its hilarious that quantum physicists think they understand all the unknown dimensions of the universe yet we cant even travel out of our microscopic solar system; we dont understand 99% of the scientific phenomena on planet earth, aka "3rd" dimension, let alone the other "9" dimensions. how can we possibly understand any other dimension if we don't fully understand our own? my quantum physics class in college was neat but a bunch of theoretical hooplah.
fishncrips123 6 months ago
@fishncrips123
Smoke a dick
ddontforgett 5 months ago
I understand the basis of it but if I had to explain it then I would be lost.
Dkautenb 6 months ago
I really enjoyed that presentation.
AEFF2 6 months ago
34 people are christians.
TheTharlon 6 months ago 2
i did understand at first. I am proud.
Klipnap 6 months ago
@buffboynick
String Theory IS NOT the same thing as the Multi-verse theory.
String Theory is the study of multiple dimensions tightly bound at a sub-quantum level. The Multi-verse theory is a belief in separate, parallel universes which are produced through quantum collisions, where the relay is determined by probability rather than Newtonian physics. A lot of people believe that a different dimension is a different universe, but they're far from being the same.
TheAbstker 6 months ago
If you can't have the eleventh dimension because you can't have more than one collection of all possible timelines for all of the possible universes, then why are there two videos about the eleventh dimension in the related videos?
Would the eleventh dimension be a line joining two points in the tenth dimension? If so then a eleventh dimension shouldn't be possible right? You would need two points in the tenth dimension, which isn't possible because one point is already EVERYTHING ever possible.
shamadooee 6 months ago
@shamadooee what if everything possible happened on an atom of an object in the eleventh?
InfernalArms22 6 months ago
@InfernalArms22 You realize that an atom is 3-dimensional. If everything possible happens on a POINT in the tenth dimension you can't get any smaller than that.
shamadooee 6 months ago
@shamadooee or is that 3d atom is just a cross section of higher dimensions of itself..
InfernalArms22 6 months ago
@InfernalArms22 Whaaaaat? Please write English.
shamadooee 6 months ago
@shamadooee Whaat? please ignore that second is, jackass
I thought of that sentecne as "What if that 3d atom is; or is that 3d atom just. That better?
InfernalArms22 6 months ago
Is it possible that two of these dimensions like the third dimension and the 7th dimension could randomly intersect each other in a random location causing us to see what would be their or what was their? My Email is Spencerlacour@yahoo.com
Please respond to this.
tigerspence 6 months ago
I'm so high.
lookitsbrandon 6 months ago
lil deuce brought me here
nidodeproteccion 6 months ago
I think his view on the 4th dim is wrong. One thing is that because of zenos paradox wouldnt the "snake" be infinitely long.
Sean0van 6 months ago
@JKJ1900 not exactly, they are just contained within the tenth dimension. Each. Infinity is stll infinitely large, namely because of the presence of time, which opens up more infinities each second.
FraggerRem 6 months ago
@JKJ1900.
FraggerRem 6 months ago
So then infinity is finite?
JKJ1900 6 months ago
@JKJ1900 it's infinite but there can be different infinities.
brandeezy108 6 months ago
I'm curious why theres a tenth dimension when it is basically just the 9nth dimension.
DarkstarColak 6 months ago
Mind Fuck.
Awhshum 7 months ago
I got confused at the 6th dimension. But still, interesting video.
Thingie5 7 months ago
So what's the 11th dimension?
mikolyshka 7 months ago
32 ignorant uneducated mindless fools
HJVJHL 7 months ago
11 minutes in length, BUT THERES ONLY 10 DIMENSIONS!!!!!!
im sorry after all that i can now see links everywhere
or maybe im just paranoid
trickyman45 7 months ago
@trickyman45 0 dimention
SOLOcan 7 months ago
mindfuck
magicaIpineapple 7 months ago
I feel so horribly small and unimportant after learning things like this...
hady9090 7 months ago
when explaining the 4th dimension he mentions if we were to see ourselves we would see a long string life from embryo to death. I was pondering this and wondered why would the string "image" stop at death does it cease to exist after we loose consciousness? Could the timeline not extend to when we rot in the ground and possibly fertilize a plant and see that plant die or feed a bird and what not? If this is not possible why does the 4th dimension "string" cease to exist when we die
greenpez198 7 months ago 21
@greenpez198 this is true but you would have a different history/future for every atom in your body at any time
HHaddow990 5 months ago
@greenpez198 omg genius
MrBurtBaugh 5 months ago
@greenpez198
Maybe we repeat our lives after we die, repeating our life over and over again exactly as it happened.
HeartBreak2291 5 months ago
@greenpez198 This whole video relates waaaaaay too much to human life. An explanation from a scientific view would have been a lot more appreciated.
M3t4lManiac 5 months ago
@greenpez198 I think if we cant comprehend the beginning of the universe then it must have always existed. Energy can not be created nor destroyed and something must have caused us to be here. As you can see in the video if you were to fold a piece of paper in circle, that represents a complete timeline of your life cycle. And thats just what it is. A cycle.
tphill1000 5 months ago
Even if someone did have a scientific reason for the start of the universe, we could still ask the same question... "what caused that?" Therefore the cause is its effect and the cycle goes on infinately.
tphill1000 5 months ago
@tphill1000 No, it doesn't. Before the universe existed, there was no time. No time, no cause and effect. Therefore, the universe does not need a cause. Well, I'm paraphrasing Stephen Hawking on that one.
CrystalSoulslayer 4 months ago
@CrystalSoulslayer
According to String Theory there are multiple universes and multiple dimensions
According to a concept known as an "infinite causality loop" there is no beginning and no end to existence because everything is related through energy
Therefore our existence in this 3rd dimension could technically cause our own reality by setting off a chain of events that leads to the beginning of this particular time and space.
Other dimensional beings could be the alternate versions of us
buffboynick 4 months ago 23
@buffboynick String theory only proclaims that multiple dimensions can exist, not that they have to exist. String theory is mathematics that started in attempts to describe experiments of inelastic scattering. It lost out to quark theory.
drakeequation521 1 month ago
@greenpez198 -as he actually demonstrates, we are not snakes but trees :)
...and as for your POV question we have to ask ourselves who is the one who 'sees' - I think I'll leave that one to Horus ;)
sm0ckr 4 months ago
@greenpez198 yeah I think technically since that line goes to infinite in both directions and possibly in all directions it would go from the begging to the end of the atoms (or smaller) that make you you and seeing the 4th dimension would include seeing all possibilties for you
richardschorriii 4 months ago
@greenpez198
Perception. It is because he is explaining the dimensions based upon our perception of those dimensions. Because we are not alive to perceive our experience of a dimension beyond our death, he does not include the duration of any additional benefit or detriment to life around us. If we assumed that our "time" line extends beyond our death, we could argue that that line could continue infinitely since the atoms that were once "us'" would still exist and be re-purposed indefinitely.
JCE0043 4 months ago
@greenpez198 the theory itself is very interesting. however you bring up a great point.his example however was a metaphor. he said the 4th dimension was Duration or Time. it could be a "string" but it would be a string from the beginning of time to the end of the universe. possibly never ending. however most scientists agree that the universe is made up of space time and matter. at the end of the universe. it is possible that time itself will end.
KuppinCasual 3 months ago
@KuppinCasual suppose we believe in the multiverse. could time end for one universe and not another? could there be a higher dimension of time in 4d hyperspace outside the universe around us? because i'm just thinking about a question like if the time in the universe ends does that mean that time in hyperspace ends too?
brandeezy108 3 months ago
@brandeezy108 yes, time could end for one and not another. suppose we believe in the multiverse theory why would they have to synchronize times. A higher dimension of time? possibly, but I doubt it. I do think however that the universe is made up of Matter, Space, and Time. to lose one is to not have a universe.
KuppinCasual 3 months ago
@greenpez198
A life is used as an example to demonstrate time. The 4th dimension is simply time, from x to z in time.
twistytwisted 3 months ago
FUCK THE TENTH DEMENSION
HollicrombieAlex 7 months ago
THIS MAKES LIFE COMPLICATED
HollicrombieAlex 7 months ago
THIS MAKES LIFE COMLICATED
HollicrombieAlex 7 months ago
Mind -> Blown. Great video!
terrencephil 8 months ago
so the tenth dimension is also zero dimensions...that's some Inception shit, right there.
OfficialAnchorsplash 8 months ago
Please excuse me whilst my head explodes
TheGumby67 8 months ago
You get LOST after the 5th... like the Wtf.
LMTZ420 8 months ago
AHHHHH MY BRAIN!!!!!
TehPuffls 8 months ago
MY HEAD! IT HURTS!
orpheus280 8 months ago
It's not that mindblowing. Just takes some time and contemplation to get used to.
TheFacelessActivist 8 months ago
what...
HOMEnHIGH 8 months ago
I got lost after the 5th. lol
erikaw1212 8 months ago
MIND = BLOWN
wosredneck 8 months ago 37
so is watching a video recording of something (which is obviously of the past) are we indirectly experiencing the 4th dimension?
Eroxter 8 months ago
"renown" is the proper spelling__FACT
I spelled it right. Look it up for yourself
lethally-retarded should be your screen name
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick You will need to give me a website that shows this.
lethalsub 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lethalsub
I have spell check on my Mac. Thats why I never misspell words lol
Goto Google and type in "renown" or Goto Wikipedia and type in "renown"
Amazing.....you have access to the most amazing thing to be created in CENTURIES (the internet) and you still dont know how to use it lol
I am starting to hope that the NWO really does succeed in killing off 80% of the human population lol
buffboynick 9 months ago
@buffboynick Please note that when you write something on a thread, it might be marked as spam, this seems to happen a lot to you. The last bit makes you sound like a fundamentalist egomaniacal retard.
lethalsub 8 months ago
@buffboynick Um, if you use spell check all the time then why do you often type "then' when "than" makes more sense?
lethalsub 8 months ago
@buffboynick If I should be called lethally-retarded, how is it I know more mathematics than you?
lethalsub 9 months ago
@lethalsub
startup a car engine.....
then suck on the tailpipe until you see the magic man lol
buffboynick 8 months ago
@buffboynick Where is this website? I looked up "world renown scientist" and I got "world renowned scientist".
Oh, you might win this one, I'll give you a flying chance, as I'll admit I know very little about string theory.
A superstring expert like yourself should find this very simple:
Take an Euclidean vector space of eleven dimensions, a vector emanating from the origin has eleven equal components of one unit. What is the length of this vector?
lethalsub 8 months ago
@lethalsub
never have kids!
buffboynick 8 months ago
@buffboynick Are you scared of answering my questions? I thought they were fairly straightforward.
lethalsub 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lethalsub
Answer these questions......
1. Do hummingbirds hum because they don't know the words?
2. Why doesnt glue stick to the inside of the bottle?
3. If one owns land then do they own it all the way to the center of the Earth?
4. Where do atoms come from? and what exists inside the smallest known sub atomic particle?
5. If eternal got in a fight with infinity who would win?
That will keep you busy awhile haha
buffboynick 8 months ago
@buffboynick Well they got spammed, lol.
lethalsub 8 months ago
@buffboynick Physicist of world wide renown, that sounds a bit better to me.
English comprehension is not my area of expertise, but it looks to me like the word renown is used incorrectly within the sentence.
Insults do not prove your prowess in any area.
lethalsub 8 months ago
@buffboynick Okay, this question is really easy. If you know any basic astronomy you should know this one.
How long does it take for the Earth to complete one revolution on its axis?
lethalsub 8 months ago
@lethalsub 23 hours and 56 minuts.
HRomega 8 months ago
@HRomega Oh, thanks a lot!
You just gave buffboynick the arch retard the right answer. At least you have the right idea.
Yep, 23 hours, 56 minutes (and 4 seconds, approximately), otherwise known as its stellar day.
lethalsub 8 months ago
@buffboynick I'm sorry, I think I've made you upset.
lethalsub 8 months ago
@buffboynick "Atoms = particles generated from the 4th dimension"
"Nothing of "physical" form can exist in the upper dimensions (dimensions 4 thru 10)"
Quotes from Mr Retard, "FACT".
It sounds like you are contradicting yourself. I've decided it is unfair to call you a retard, 'the arch-retard' is more apt.
lethalsub 8 months ago
@buffboynick Well, if you have kids, I would avoid helping them with their maths homework, they will end up as mathematically retarded as yourself. Get me to teach them instead, with any luck they might manage to solve Riemann's Hypothesis (If it is actually possible to prove it).
PS Why aren't you talking to me?
lethalsub 8 months ago
@buffboynick Well that would be pointless, I don't know how to drive.
lethalsub 8 months ago
step one: push play
step two: let mind be blown for next 11 minutes
jondrake92 9 months ago
f the tenth dimension
ntgd83 9 months ago
yea we watched this in Philosophy class today... basically everyone is calling it a mindfuckery.... lol I mostly understand it I think... I'll watch it a again a few times lol XD
SillyNerdify 9 months ago
@SillyNerdify stfu
ntgd83 9 months ago
Michio Kaku did NOT invent String Theory nor the concept of MultiVerses......you DOLT!
mquallet 9 months ago