America is racially pretty diversed, and it's still a leading country in the World both economically and militarily. It's quite possible that if there were only white Yankees in America, the country would be even stronger. Anyway, in my view the main strenghth of America is in its ability to provide plenty of social and economic opportunities to plenty of its citizens and new comers. The fact, that even a mixed guy can be your president, is rather a strength of America than weakness in my eyes.
The jews are the ones behind multiculturalism,political correctness and open border policies in Europe and America with the intent of flooding our countries with millions of third worlders and destroying the European race...
Who is behind this racial conflict? The Jews! They get all the other races at each others throats and they come out on top. All races unite against the Jews!
Yeah, sure for your politcians, not for the people, these differences are exploited to enforce the 'Divide and rule' strategy.
It is a threat to meritocracy, to unity, etc.
My country, the most diverse country in the world( India) still has trouble eradicating hunger, while homogenous countries like South Korea made it to the first world in just 40 years.
your just not getting my point. I'm not saying it wont work im just saying whats the point of removing racism if your just removing the people your trying to protect in the first place
thats not really my point. my point is that blaming racism on racial diversity is blaming a crime on the victim, instead of the criminal. Perhaps the crime of racism would go down if you removed just the victims of it, but if you do that then just whats the point? your just removing the people you tried to protect in the first place!
@1860george: How do u know most people secretly think like JT of Amren. Just because u adhere to a certain set of beliefs and are prejudiced against a set of people for whatever reason and u are convinced about those beliefs, does not imply the same for all. Unless u are G-d who has that ability to get into other people's minds, there simply is no logical or factual basis to purport this ridiculous notion that most people share ur views. To think otherwise would be simple logical fallacy!
guns germs and steel was a pile of pseudo-science horseshit. an entire book trying to prove that the differences in human development result from anything but intelligence. i especially laughed at his comments about native populations being superior to whites, while dismissing IQ tests as non-science without any real proof. all i have to say is cajamarca 1532 - 80,000 primitives defeated by 169 spaniards is enough proof of our superiority.
Many of his arguments are over simplified. Out of everything, respect and education of race issues negate many of his problems he list that come from diversity.
By "education" do you mean conditioning people to believe race doesn't exist, it's just in their imaginations?? Just curious because we ARE being educated already; it is your solutions [to the problems diversity creates] that are over-simplified, actually.
Respect isn't something that can be taught either, and the burden of teaching it certainly shouldn't be government's regardless. "Diversity is our strength" means nothing, it is just a tired Utopian cliche, a feel-good lie.
Therefore, I think the conflicts are due to cultural diversities. So many different cultures have persisted for so many generations in the US, and unless cultural unification is achieved (a stantdard "american" culture is created), conflicts will persist.
everyone gets along well and theire are no conflicts, and nobody devides in groups. People from all diverse backgrounds in different social statuses, types of jobs, religions, ect. The thing is, everyone shares the same culture. Everyone considers themselves a Puertorican and everyone behaves the same culturally. Even those who imigrate here change their attitude in just a few months, and everyone adapts to the only culture (with a few exceptions, mainly the adult asians).
I have a problem with this video. The thing is, I agree about the conflicts diversity causes in the US, but he truth is that the issues are caused more by cultural diversities than racial ones. Here in Puerto Rico there is a pretty even mix of white, black, and all colors in between. People from spanish heritage, italian heritage, dominican heritage, french heritage, cuban heritage, and the list goes on. There are catholics, dozens of protestant sects, and atheists/agnostics. Yet... (post above)
for a few years I went to a baptist church that prided itself on being 50/50 white and black. however, in the sanctuary we sat on opposite sides of each other. there was no "colored" and "white" seating arrangement, and neither were we forced to sit together; we unconsciously went by instinct.
Diversity officers in companies do nothing more than make that company's products and services less competitive in the market. Diverse American companies will find it hard to compete with homogeneous Chinese companies.
People who promote racial diversity admit they think along racial lines which means they, themselves are racist. Because this is really just in white countries, it is anti-white racism.
Unless you expand your business for the sole purpose of creating jobs for other races, there will always be someone who loses out. This is almost always a white applicant who has NOT brought this on himself by migrating. If you are white, you have nothing to gain and everything to lose from "diversity". Wake up!
sure, don't go for integration, but unless you plan to live in seclusion like North Korea, racial integration is unavoidable. Just a matter of sooner or later. the world is as good as border-less now with fast communication, e.g. internet. what each country need to focus on is how to best manage it when it comes.
I think children are better than adults when it comes to integration, racial-wise or whatever. maybe we should look at them for example
Why are you saying this? No, firms which are homogeneous run better. It's economically more efficient to have homogeneous, segregated firms. No, you don't have to be like north korea to state-segregate. Examples of economically prosperous state-segregation: Japan, Taiwan, Europe up to the 1960s, the whites in apartheid south africa, 1/3 of the united states up to 1965. Any country which isn't a representative mix of all races, is segregating to that degree.
Children don't fight about race. Adults do. Thus adults should racially separate. Children fight about things like toys and candy. Racial differences, like gender differences, don't manifest until later in life, "gene amplification". Up to about age 3, you can raise a human with a chimp and aside from speech, they'll be intellectual peers. If you put human and chimp toddlers together, they will play together. Does this mean adult humans and chimps should integrate?
Studies have been done since the 40's, including the infamous "doll tests". Now most would tell you the parents teach their children these preferences, but it's human nature to surround themselves with their own kind. If children are going to be compared to sponges (soaking up everything they hear and see), it has to be applied to the behavior of other races in their presence as well as what their parents may or may not believe, which is never noted in the studies. It's basic survival instinct
@reignclaw This coming from a guy under the rest of the world. Go tend to your sheep and let the rest of us deal with this matter ourselves. You dolt!!
@4shacks1house yeah you go deal with it champ..... i will make sure our fluffy white sheep dont mix with the fluffy non white sheep and i will also make sure to label them correctly b4 export so you dont get confused at the supermarket........we wouldnt want you to turn into a black man overnight now would we.
@VedicViking look mister viking stop being romantic and start using your nogin. just ask yourself this who started all this commercial mixing of the races in the first place huh?...then ask yourself why?.... jeez mate the bloody same people who organised that are now strangling the european and american economies to the point of financial collapse and you are worried about your racial purity???...what a joke.
@VedicViking for centuries your country was invaded and conqured by all sorts of foreigners so its highly unlikely you are the person you think you are....but, you know PRETEND all you like if it makes you feel better :)
@xanos4225 yeah, and leftards will have you believe that the lack of diversity at your high school is going to lead to you white folk forming lynch mobs to kill other races because you were never exposed to "other cultures."
I think to a SMALL point he is right, we all like to be with others that like the same things we like. But color, from a conservative view is not a problem. I believe, as Americans we got away from being Americans! We are Italian-Americans, African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans or whatever hyphenated american (AKA Salad Bole) instead of just being an American (Melting Pot). If you are an American say so. If you are not go home!
He's not talking about color, he's talking about race.
I have no clue what an "american" is. Is it a subject of the US federal gov't? "America" means different things to different people, and these people project their preferences onto symbols, mystic stories and sacred texts, each claiming that their preferences are "america" or "the real america".
People don't say "italian-american" anymore because, being white-european, their language group was absorbed and integrated. Culture is very easily malleable and ephemeral, that's why whites of different cultures can integrate, while blacks from ostensibly a much more similar culture, do not, as the behavioral differences are hard wired and won't be bridged until the genetics can be engineered to do so.
Protip: pretending the genetic differences don't exist doesn't help you.
@frinny If whites from different cultures can easily integrate with other whites, why are their various instances in US history and world history , where the largest conflicts and homicide rates have been with other whites. In US history, the largest homicide rates have been in the earliest part of US history when the US was strictly a white nation. Whites were in conflict with each other for centuries and the homicide rate in exclusively white countries eclipses the homicide rate in US now.
So the Russia would be better off if they just got more black people, because the US has less violent crime than Russia.
No, Iceland, Norway, Denmark, and many other 90%+ white countries have lower reported homicide rates than the US, and within the US it's the most non-white and non-east asian areas that have the most violence. Put blacks there, you get similar racial splits.
And I don't think homicide rate is a good proxy for "degree of integration" anyway.
@fringeelements Them being 90 % white countries isn't what is driving the low homicide rates in those countries; How about because those countries tend to make up the wealthiest countries on the planet and wealthy countries in general tend to have low homicide rates. If it was because they are "naturally less prone to violence" because they are white, then history would show that they have always been peaceful, and that just isn't the case given the past exorbitant high homicide rates.
Bob and Bill both eat the same diet. Bob is fatter than Bill. Obviously the diet is not causing Bob to be fatter than bill, something else is. So does that mean Bob or Bill could eat a bunch of cookies and not get more fat?
Denmark and Russia are mostly white, but Russia has higher violent crime. Does that mean denmark or russia could bring in a bunch of blacks and not have higher VC? Especially since in both denmark and russia, blacks commit more violent crimes than whites?
If you wish to make the case that there is more to violent crime than the genetic predisposition that is distributed among racial types, I would agree. But that doesn't mean it's a non-factor.
Also, it's not the same thing as integration. East Asians have a lower violent crime rate than whites, yet are less integrated than the formerly distinct white ethnic groups are.
@fringeelements The united states, regardless of the racial demographics during time periods of US history, have always had high violent rates and have tended to embrace a more violent ridden culture than our european neighbors across the pond. In many US towns in the southwestern united states during the 'wild west' era, the homicide rate was one person per 100 killed. This took place when 90 percent of the US was white, not 60 percent as it is today.
While I agree that, even when controlled for race, places like the US, Australia and Russia have higher violent crime rates, you're probably wrong about the "wild west".
The data is sparse on the "wild west", but what little data there is is that the violence was lower than in the incorporated states, and it was more feud-based and between parties which both wanted to fight. I would like to see where you got the estimate of 1 to 100 in "the southwest".
@friny No, I don't think I am wrong. The historian Randolph Roth has done scholarly work on the history of the homicide rate in the united states and he specifically observes that the homicide rate in southwestern cities was around 1 per 100 person, compared to 65 per 100000 person , one of the highest homicide rates today. He states that the homicide rates were high by the 19th century standards, except in the american south. Pinker notes homicide rates for blacks and whites WERE very similar
Well, modern info on homicide rates are better than those in the past, and modern data says that there are racial disparities, so the most reasonable default assumption would be that Pinker is wrong. Perhaps black homocides were underreported, as interpol claims is the case in South Africa.
I'm not sure why you're so interested in homicide rates. This video was about functional multiracial democratic states being unworkable.
@fringeelements I never made the claim that Pinker stated that the homicide rates today are worst off than they were in the past. I actually said the exact opposite actually. I made the claim that Pinker said that the homicide rates between blacks and whites were more convergent or they were similar in the past than they are today because they have become more divergent and dissimilar as time has past , most notably during the 1960's and thats a fact.
@Pentazoid111 stodles is a fucking retard who speaks out of both sides of his mouth. have you ever looked at a map of europe? notice all the jagged edges of national boundaries? wanna know why that is? it's because europeans fought and killed each other for centuries over each and every square inch of europe because the different tribes and ethnic groups were so incompatible with each other.
czechoslovakia was an experiment in pan european compatibility but due to the incompatibility of czechs and slovaks it dissolved and became separate nations. ditto with yugoslavia before is split into bosnia, albania etc. how's the compatibility between the irish and the british? i could go on and on and on.
stodles should stick to prostituting himself and performing oral sex on strange men in the parking lots of abandoned warehouses and leave thinking to the thinkers.
@TheBigBadWoIf Ain't that the truth? Not to mentioned that the two big wars during the twentieth century that carried the largest death toll for humans in human history in a war, i.e. ww1 and ww2 were largely fought by europeans. Talking to many of these white nationalists online, you get the feeling that that if whites were in a region that only included whites and excluded everyone else, everything would suddenly be milk and honey, completely ignorant of world history, both recent and modern.
@Pentazoid111 Yeah this is you bringing in new irrelevant things and implied straw men. The only way I could even respond to this would be to make a ground-up explanation of my position.
Multi-language group states, like the US, did work and the whites all got assimilated. Same thing happened in the unification of france, germany, italy and britain. Because there are no substantive differences between european populations, these states were able to break down the phony and ephemeral "cultural differences" over time. Though the US probably had an easier job due to self-selection and transplantation.
This attempt at equivocating racial and "cultural" differences is weird.
BULLSHIT. He's using low income / poor / poverty stricken people. There are many many different people of color / white who live together in harmony in upper-class / middle class neighborhood who don't fall into this stereotypical ridiculousness.
Majority doesn't mean all. You'll always have outliers. Income is an ever-present excuse used by Egalitarians which is never applied universally. There are also people among the lower incomes that don't mind living together, but that could be a case for lack of education more than income. Either way, poverty is no excuse for behavior, good or bad, and the majority of folks would much rather be among their own.
America is racially pretty diversed, and it's still a leading country in the World both economically and militarily. It's quite possible that if there were only white Yankees in America, the country would be even stronger. Anyway, in my view the main strenghth of America is in its ability to provide plenty of social and economic opportunities to plenty of its citizens and new comers. The fact, that even a mixed guy can be your president, is rather a strength of America than weakness in my eyes.
danielsondanielson 20 hours ago
Great video.
Dercommandingofficer 2 weeks ago
But without diversity restaurant choices are so boring.
priapus512 3 weeks ago
@priapus512 A resturant food option between a peacful and culturally aware Homogenous nation? Good argument.
Since when do we need to import Millions of different races to have a certain food?
can we not just import Chinese food without having Chinese people living in our nations?
lakewood425 2 weeks ago
@lakewood425
you have a good point there. the italian restaurants were amazing in south korea - and there weren't any italians working there.
oregonflatland 2 weeks ago
lesbians, nudists and fruit juice drinkers..lol!
MouthOfTheUnknown 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The jews are the ones behind multiculturalism,political correctness and open border policies in Europe and America with the intent of flooding our countries with millions of third worlders and destroying the European race...
george564as 4 weeks ago
Who is behind this racial conflict? The Jews! They get all the other races at each others throats and they come out on top. All races unite against the Jews!
MrTheEldersOfZion 4 weeks ago in playlist More videos from AmRenVideos 3
Diversity is a strength?
Yeah, sure for your politcians, not for the people, these differences are exploited to enforce the 'Divide and rule' strategy.
It is a threat to meritocracy, to unity, etc.
My country, the most diverse country in the world( India) still has trouble eradicating hunger, while homogenous countries like South Korea made it to the first world in just 40 years.
IndianAtheist1990 4 weeks ago
Excellent video. Keep it up.
TheEthnicState 1 month ago
@MrHerrIQ2
your just not getting my point. I'm not saying it wont work im just saying whats the point of removing racism if your just removing the people your trying to protect in the first place
brickman409 1 month ago
@MrHerrIQ2
thats not really my point. my point is that blaming racism on racial diversity is blaming a crime on the victim, instead of the criminal. Perhaps the crime of racism would go down if you removed just the victims of it, but if you do that then just whats the point? your just removing the people you tried to protect in the first place!
brickman409 1 month ago
How true.
doczg88 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1860george: How do u know most people secretly think like JT of Amren. Just because u adhere to a certain set of beliefs and are prejudiced against a set of people for whatever reason and u are convinced about those beliefs, does not imply the same for all. Unless u are G-d who has that ability to get into other people's minds, there simply is no logical or factual basis to purport this ridiculous notion that most people share ur views. To think otherwise would be simple logical fallacy!
paxfromindy 1 month ago
@paxfromindy Only Jews write "G-d" instead of "God." Go comment on a Jared Diamond video instead of a Jared Taylor video, you treacherous parasite.
WeissBrotShegetz 3 weeks ago
@WeissBrotShegetz
guns germs and steel was a pile of pseudo-science horseshit. an entire book trying to prove that the differences in human development result from anything but intelligence. i especially laughed at his comments about native populations being superior to whites, while dismissing IQ tests as non-science without any real proof. all i have to say is cajamarca 1532 - 80,000 primitives defeated by 169 spaniards is enough proof of our superiority.
oregonflatland 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
paxfromindy 1 month ago
Many of his arguments are over simplified. Out of everything, respect and education of race issues negate many of his problems he list that come from diversity.
Ajihood 1 month ago
@Ajihood
By "education" do you mean conditioning people to believe race doesn't exist, it's just in their imaginations?? Just curious because we ARE being educated already; it is your solutions [to the problems diversity creates] that are over-simplified, actually.
Respect isn't something that can be taught either, and the burden of teaching it certainly shouldn't be government's regardless. "Diversity is our strength" means nothing, it is just a tired Utopian cliche, a feel-good lie.
bobshenix 3 weeks ago
Therefore, I think the conflicts are due to cultural diversities. So many different cultures have persisted for so many generations in the US, and unless cultural unification is achieved (a stantdard "american" culture is created), conflicts will persist.
metalspector 2 months ago
everyone gets along well and theire are no conflicts, and nobody devides in groups. People from all diverse backgrounds in different social statuses, types of jobs, religions, ect. The thing is, everyone shares the same culture. Everyone considers themselves a Puertorican and everyone behaves the same culturally. Even those who imigrate here change their attitude in just a few months, and everyone adapts to the only culture (with a few exceptions, mainly the adult asians).
metalspector 2 months ago
I have a problem with this video. The thing is, I agree about the conflicts diversity causes in the US, but he truth is that the issues are caused more by cultural diversities than racial ones. Here in Puerto Rico there is a pretty even mix of white, black, and all colors in between. People from spanish heritage, italian heritage, dominican heritage, french heritage, cuban heritage, and the list goes on. There are catholics, dozens of protestant sects, and atheists/agnostics. Yet... (post above)
metalspector 2 months ago
blaming race for racism is like blaming dorks for school bullying
brickman409 3 months ago
Comment removed
Pentazoid111 3 months ago
Go to a country like Japan or Korea where 99% of the people are the same race. You'll see how little problems they have.
Mattwad 3 months ago
Come to Seattle!
HeyRuka 3 months ago
for a few years I went to a baptist church that prided itself on being 50/50 white and black. however, in the sanctuary we sat on opposite sides of each other. there was no "colored" and "white" seating arrangement, and neither were we forced to sit together; we unconsciously went by instinct.
RoyalMessup 3 months ago
Diversity officers in companies do nothing more than make that company's products and services less competitive in the market. Diverse American companies will find it hard to compete with homogeneous Chinese companies.
epmer31 3 months ago 4
Comment removed
Terzos92 3 months ago
Racism between blacks and Hispanics frankly nobody (especially in media) gives a rats ass about. It's not interesting or entertaining.
BUT - racism between whites and any other race - that's headline news.
RLH2719 3 months ago 9
People who promote racial diversity admit they think along racial lines which means they, themselves are racist. Because this is really just in white countries, it is anti-white racism.
Unless you expand your business for the sole purpose of creating jobs for other races, there will always be someone who loses out. This is almost always a white applicant who has NOT brought this on himself by migrating. If you are white, you have nothing to gain and everything to lose from "diversity". Wake up!
G12002 3 months ago 5
sure, don't go for integration, but unless you plan to live in seclusion like North Korea, racial integration is unavoidable. Just a matter of sooner or later. the world is as good as border-less now with fast communication, e.g. internet. what each country need to focus on is how to best manage it when it comes.
I think children are better than adults when it comes to integration, racial-wise or whatever. maybe we should look at them for example
jewellx80 3 months ago
Why are you saying this? No, firms which are homogeneous run better. It's economically more efficient to have homogeneous, segregated firms. No, you don't have to be like north korea to state-segregate. Examples of economically prosperous state-segregation: Japan, Taiwan, Europe up to the 1960s, the whites in apartheid south africa, 1/3 of the united states up to 1965. Any country which isn't a representative mix of all races, is segregating to that degree.
fringeelements 3 months ago in playlist fringeelements's favorites
Children don't fight about race. Adults do. Thus adults should racially separate. Children fight about things like toys and candy. Racial differences, like gender differences, don't manifest until later in life, "gene amplification". Up to about age 3, you can raise a human with a chimp and aside from speech, they'll be intellectual peers. If you put human and chimp toddlers together, they will play together. Does this mean adult humans and chimps should integrate?
fringeelements 3 months ago in playlist fringeelements's favorites
Studies have been done since the 40's, including the infamous "doll tests". Now most would tell you the parents teach their children these preferences, but it's human nature to surround themselves with their own kind. If children are going to be compared to sponges (soaking up everything they hear and see), it has to be applied to the behavior of other races in their presence as well as what their parents may or may not believe, which is never noted in the studies. It's basic survival instinct
7281546309 3 months ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if this loser is the american resistance then you yanks need to surrender now!
reignclaw 3 months ago
@reignclaw This coming from a guy under the rest of the world. Go tend to your sheep and let the rest of us deal with this matter ourselves. You dolt!!
4shacks1house 3 months ago
@4shacks1house yeah you go deal with it champ..... i will make sure our fluffy white sheep dont mix with the fluffy non white sheep and i will also make sure to label them correctly b4 export so you dont get confused at the supermarket........we wouldnt want you to turn into a black man overnight now would we.
reignclaw 3 months ago
@reignclaw Yeah that’s it, if you’re too thick to respond to what someone’s saying, just pretend to think they’re a loser instead…
VedicViking 3 months ago
@VedicViking look mister viking stop being romantic and start using your nogin. just ask yourself this who started all this commercial mixing of the races in the first place huh?...then ask yourself why?.... jeez mate the bloody same people who organised that are now strangling the european and american economies to the point of financial collapse and you are worried about your racial purity???...what a joke.
reignclaw 3 months ago
@VedicViking for centuries your country was invaded and conqured by all sorts of foreigners so its highly unlikely you are the person you think you are....but, you know PRETEND all you like if it makes you feel better :)
reignclaw 3 months ago
We never had race relation problems at my high school. Everyone was white.
xanos4225 3 months ago 70
@xanos4225 HAHAHA....
MAZDAKPRODUCTION 3 months ago
@xanos4225 yeah, and leftards will have you believe that the lack of diversity at your high school is going to lead to you white folk forming lynch mobs to kill other races because you were never exposed to "other cultures."
UltraProle21 3 months ago
Tell a lie often enough,,,
Hughganaught 3 months ago
i get your point but diversity of race isnt really the problem, its the intolerance of race is the problem
brickman409 3 months ago
@brickman409 Fuck tolerance
Esoparagon 3 months ago
diversity means, "to divide"., -And it's worked.
rickster348 3 months ago 4
I think to a SMALL point he is right, we all like to be with others that like the same things we like. But color, from a conservative view is not a problem. I believe, as Americans we got away from being Americans! We are Italian-Americans, African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans or whatever hyphenated american (AKA Salad Bole) instead of just being an American (Melting Pot). If you are an American say so. If you are not go home!
EIBBOR2654 3 months ago
He's not talking about color, he's talking about race.
I have no clue what an "american" is. Is it a subject of the US federal gov't? "America" means different things to different people, and these people project their preferences onto symbols, mystic stories and sacred texts, each claiming that their preferences are "america" or "the real america".
fringeelements 3 months ago in playlist fringeelements's favorites
People don't say "italian-american" anymore because, being white-european, their language group was absorbed and integrated. Culture is very easily malleable and ephemeral, that's why whites of different cultures can integrate, while blacks from ostensibly a much more similar culture, do not, as the behavioral differences are hard wired and won't be bridged until the genetics can be engineered to do so.
Protip: pretending the genetic differences don't exist doesn't help you.
fringeelements 3 months ago 49
@frinny If whites from different cultures can easily integrate with other whites, why are their various instances in US history and world history , where the largest conflicts and homicide rates have been with other whites. In US history, the largest homicide rates have been in the earliest part of US history when the US was strictly a white nation. Whites were in conflict with each other for centuries and the homicide rate in exclusively white countries eclipses the homicide rate in US now.
Pentazoid111 3 months ago
So the Russia would be better off if they just got more black people, because the US has less violent crime than Russia.
No, Iceland, Norway, Denmark, and many other 90%+ white countries have lower reported homicide rates than the US, and within the US it's the most non-white and non-east asian areas that have the most violence. Put blacks there, you get similar racial splits.
And I don't think homicide rate is a good proxy for "degree of integration" anyway.
fringeelements 3 months ago
@fringeelements Them being 90 % white countries isn't what is driving the low homicide rates in those countries; How about because those countries tend to make up the wealthiest countries on the planet and wealthy countries in general tend to have low homicide rates. If it was because they are "naturally less prone to violence" because they are white, then history would show that they have always been peaceful, and that just isn't the case given the past exorbitant high homicide rates.
Pentazoid111 3 months ago
Bob and Bill both eat the same diet. Bob is fatter than Bill. Obviously the diet is not causing Bob to be fatter than bill, something else is. So does that mean Bob or Bill could eat a bunch of cookies and not get more fat?
Denmark and Russia are mostly white, but Russia has higher violent crime. Does that mean denmark or russia could bring in a bunch of blacks and not have higher VC? Especially since in both denmark and russia, blacks commit more violent crimes than whites?
fringeelements 3 months ago
If you wish to make the case that there is more to violent crime than the genetic predisposition that is distributed among racial types, I would agree. But that doesn't mean it's a non-factor.
Also, it's not the same thing as integration. East Asians have a lower violent crime rate than whites, yet are less integrated than the formerly distinct white ethnic groups are.
fringeelements 3 months ago
@fringeelements The united states, regardless of the racial demographics during time periods of US history, have always had high violent rates and have tended to embrace a more violent ridden culture than our european neighbors across the pond. In many US towns in the southwestern united states during the 'wild west' era, the homicide rate was one person per 100 killed. This took place when 90 percent of the US was white, not 60 percent as it is today.
Pentazoid111 3 months ago
While I agree that, even when controlled for race, places like the US, Australia and Russia have higher violent crime rates, you're probably wrong about the "wild west".
The data is sparse on the "wild west", but what little data there is is that the violence was lower than in the incorporated states, and it was more feud-based and between parties which both wanted to fight. I would like to see where you got the estimate of 1 to 100 in "the southwest".
fringeelements 3 months ago
Comment removed
Pentazoid111 3 months ago
@friny No, I don't think I am wrong. The historian Randolph Roth has done scholarly work on the history of the homicide rate in the united states and he specifically observes that the homicide rate in southwestern cities was around 1 per 100 person, compared to 65 per 100000 person , one of the highest homicide rates today. He states that the homicide rates were high by the 19th century standards, except in the american south. Pinker notes homicide rates for blacks and whites WERE very similar
Pentazoid111 3 months ago
@Pentazoid111 were very similar during the past and the homicide rates for both blacks and whites started to diverged after the 1960's
Pentazoid111 3 months ago
Well, modern info on homicide rates are better than those in the past, and modern data says that there are racial disparities, so the most reasonable default assumption would be that Pinker is wrong. Perhaps black homocides were underreported, as interpol claims is the case in South Africa.
I'm not sure why you're so interested in homicide rates. This video was about functional multiracial democratic states being unworkable.
fringeelements 3 months ago
@fringeelements I never made the claim that Pinker stated that the homicide rates today are worst off than they were in the past. I actually said the exact opposite actually. I made the claim that Pinker said that the homicide rates between blacks and whites were more convergent or they were similar in the past than they are today because they have become more divergent and dissimilar as time has past , most notably during the 1960's and thats a fact.
Pentazoid111 3 months ago
@Pentazoid111 stodles is a fucking retard who speaks out of both sides of his mouth. have you ever looked at a map of europe? notice all the jagged edges of national boundaries? wanna know why that is? it's because europeans fought and killed each other for centuries over each and every square inch of europe because the different tribes and ethnic groups were so incompatible with each other.
TheBigBadWoIf 3 months ago
(cont)
czechoslovakia was an experiment in pan european compatibility but due to the incompatibility of czechs and slovaks it dissolved and became separate nations. ditto with yugoslavia before is split into bosnia, albania etc. how's the compatibility between the irish and the british? i could go on and on and on.
stodles should stick to prostituting himself and performing oral sex on strange men in the parking lots of abandoned warehouses and leave thinking to the thinkers.
TheBigBadWoIf 3 months ago
@TheBigBadWoIf Ain't that the truth? Not to mentioned that the two big wars during the twentieth century that carried the largest death toll for humans in human history in a war, i.e. ww1 and ww2 were largely fought by europeans. Talking to many of these white nationalists online, you get the feeling that that if whites were in a region that only included whites and excluded everyone else, everything would suddenly be milk and honey, completely ignorant of world history, both recent and modern.
Pentazoid111 3 months ago
@Pentazoid111 Yeah this is you bringing in new irrelevant things and implied straw men. The only way I could even respond to this would be to make a ground-up explanation of my position.
fringeelements 3 months ago
Multi-language group states, like the US, did work and the whites all got assimilated. Same thing happened in the unification of france, germany, italy and britain. Because there are no substantive differences between european populations, these states were able to break down the phony and ephemeral "cultural differences" over time. Though the US probably had an easier job due to self-selection and transplantation.
This attempt at equivocating racial and "cultural" differences is weird.
fringeelements 3 months ago
Comment removed
Pentazoid111 3 months ago
True
guiqui5 3 months ago
There is a clear program of racial genocide and race replacement in former white countrys.
youjerkbryan 3 months ago
BULLSHIT. He's using low income / poor / poverty stricken people. There are many many different people of color / white who live together in harmony in upper-class / middle class neighborhood who don't fall into this stereotypical ridiculousness.
jmprater 3 months ago
@jmprater
Majority doesn't mean all. You'll always have outliers. Income is an ever-present excuse used by Egalitarians which is never applied universally. There are also people among the lower incomes that don't mind living together, but that could be a case for lack of education more than income. Either way, poverty is no excuse for behavior, good or bad, and the majority of folks would much rather be among their own.
7281546309 3 months ago
Dr. Taylor's arguments are so strong... I use them on my friends and they are all speechless. Thank you!
TrueScandinavia 3 months ago
Great video Jared. I think you'll do well on youtube. Well, as well as a WN can do.
fringeelements 3 months ago 6
Spot on, as always. I suggest reading Mr. Taylor's latest book "White Identity" to get a true background on the sentiments of this video.
7281546309 3 months ago 2