Prizes should be reserved for contests, where there is a clear set of conditions by witch the input is judged. Such prizes as the Nobel and also the comparable awards in the arts, such as the oscars are not about defining who is best, it's just shoving feathers up each others arses.
I trust you all more than anything but u should have put a hand on the led just to show us the sound stopped! BTW i am gna try that in college tomo!! let me just get my hands on some of that glass tube thingy...hmm...
immediately recalled Feynman's voice in my head saying "who else is worthy to join this wonderful group that we are" while he was talking about his Nobel Prize and how he bothered with the way it is conducted.
WAIT!! ...so the swirling lights at the bottom of a pool of water isn't the light coming down from above; its the light reflected from the bottom of the pool and then bouncing back again from the underside of the waters surface. '8o
@temporaldisplacement: Some are, some aren't. The "shimmering pool in the darkness " effect is indirect underwater lighting partially reflecting off the undersurface of the water.
i just don't understand how a complex unique piece of sound, complete with its own particular timbre, tempo, pitch, distortions, amplitude etc can be transmitted via something as crude as a flashing LED??! Can someone explain how it works? how does so much continuous information (in multiple planes) get transmitted vis a flashing light which is only continuous in one plane. ie on, off and everything in between. someone explain please!
timbre, tempo, pitch, distortions.. are just ways of describing our perception of sound. What you say is multiple planes, since sound is a wave are: velocity, frequency, amplitude and wavelength. Velocity of sound is constant, when velocity is constant, frequency is dependent on wavelength. We are left with two planes; frequency and amplitude. Amplitude is the diode's brightness, frequency is it's speed of change. The amplitude can be changed by the volume.
ahh ok, how interesting.- so every sound at any given moment can be described by a particular wave. Putting many of these waves together in sequence and we got a sound that we interpret as a complex sound. Since, velocity is constant and wavelength depends on frequency (and vice versa), then we only have frequency and amplitude information which needs to be transmitted. thanks. This also explains how something as simple of string can transmit sound with 2 cups attached to either end
Fiber Optics(Internet) and CCD(All imaging period these days) are hands down deserving of this reward. These are technologies through the research of physics that have advanced all of mankind.
Quantum Mechanics and String Theory are mathematical systems to describe what we essentially don't understand but can predict. It's just very hard to justify to the committee the beauty of numbers that for all intensive purposes don't have any use for mankind. If you can make a practical quantum computer by scratching on a chalkboard then you'll get a Nobel Prize. Just don't be surprised by industry dominated technologies winning.
@525047: "...that for all intents and purposes don't have any use for mankind".
Einstein's general and special theories of relativity; Darwin's theory of evolution; the discovery of the structure of DNA; the development of quantum mechanics; the literature of Herta Mueller (this year's Nobel prize-winner for Literature); the discovery of the cosmic microwave background....
All of "no use" to mankind without technological/commercial application...?
@simba00784: Any combination of sound sources are all eventually added up in the ear/microphone) to form a single waveform in time. It contains the entire information content of the sum of the original sources; this is probably best seen on old-style LP records, where the wavering of the needle in the groove plays back the entire symphony orchestra. In digital forms like a CD, the waveform is sampled at some rate (such as 44,000 times per sec) and the raw numbers are stored in a .wav file.
... Note that some information in the individual sources may be lost in the summation; a trumpet might override a triangle's ting, for example. Distortion might intervene once the sources are summed, and the digitization inevitably leads to loss of very high frequencies (hopefully beyond hearing anyway). There's many a slip twixt the cup and the lip.
Light, like sound, has three qualities: frequency, amplitude, and a third quality you might call 'saturation' i.e. how many of the photons/sound waves are reaching the target. Sound may seem complex, but it's really just a wave, much like a radio wave (althought not actually the same). The LED doesn't just turn on and off, it can vary in brightness based on the voltage.
If you think about it, computer microphones/speakers convert sound into electricity and then back into sound.
In this case sound (the person speaking) --> electric current (via microphone) --> electromagnetic waves (radio tower/amplifier) --> electric current (the radio) --> light --> electric current again --> sound!
you can do both, Nikola Tesla found deep fundamental knowledge of electricity and built very practical applications
I know there are physicts like Einstein that don't concern themselves with the practical but being able to use something on a practical basis seems to me to reinforce the correctness of the underlying theory
@JerryKitich: It's worth remembering that Einstein won the Nobel prize not for relativity but for his work on the photoelectric effect. It is the photoelectric effect which underpins the operation of the CCD.
This is one example, of countless many, where fundamental and applied physics "feed" off each other. So, in that sense, I agree with you.
Nevertheless, I'm of the opinion that the words "physics" and "technology" are not synonymous!
@Moriarity I agree with you I don't think physics means technology either - I was aware of what Einstein won his prize for and I'm also aware the gave the prize money to his first wife and his children
I have read though that Einstein had almost no interest in practical applications
I completely support physics doing fundamental research but it may also be worth remembering that Tesla was lighting up the worlds fair well with AC well before Rutherford's atomic fundamental experiments
@JerryKitich: How then did Einstein come to patent (along with Leo Szilard) a refrigerator?
This is a bit facetious; it is said that Szilard did most of the work, while Einstein consulted and did the patent paperwork (having some experience at patents, don't you know?).
Impressive fiber optic demonstration! I meant to ask this last night... the setup looks remarkably simple, much simpler than I imagined the sender and receiver to be. Would you mind sharing a hint/link on how to recreate this experiment?
@celeph: the ones used in computer applications are similar to these in concept, but there is a lot of tech wrapped up in maintaining high speeds over long distances.
@nurikosguardian my favourite internal reflection demostrations are withe water jets and shooting a laser within the light and watching the laser light bend with the water
@Bluebuthappy182: It's a really, really cheap (~£100) Les Paul copy! Prof. Bowley and I discuss the physics of waves in the Sixty Symbols video on Fourier analysis.
Ok. But then a laser pointer would be even more impressing, because you can see the beam because of impurites inside the glass. If you have a laser pointer and a piece of PMMA you can try it yourself.
@Yony42: Professor Merrifield made a video for us about why this is on his shelf... the video is on our channel called nottinghamscience and titled "Atlas of Creation".
A torch wouldn't really be working, because you can't modulate incadescent bulbs fast enough. The filament glows and has to heat up and cool down to change brightness, which (I estimate) takes a few tenth of a second. But for voice you would have to be able to switch the light on and off a few hundred times per second. A LED is off instantly (at least when considering the audible frequency range).
The LED part seems to be a simple transistor amplifier circuit. The receiver would be an current-to-voltage converter using an operational amplifier. These are both very basic circuits. If you know how to read a circuit diagram, you should be able to find many examples online, if you don't get a diagram here.
i was discussing fibre optics with some videographers and this for minuture camera work is ideal and a wonder how we havent used it before so well done the inventors and Bell Labs for ccd, good vid
This has been flagged as spam show
Ever tried the cabbage diet? lol
ImJustSlime 4 days ago
wow.. extraordinary explanation about optical fiber in action. very interesting.. even the topic is about the noble prize...
lovelplants 2 months ago
Hi, great vid, like always, Ițm interested in the two circuits used in the demonstration, any idea where I could get the diagrams? Thanks!
cd4600 3 months ago
Prizes should be reserved for contests, where there is a clear set of conditions by witch the input is judged. Such prizes as the Nobel and also the comparable awards in the arts, such as the oscars are not about defining who is best, it's just shoving feathers up each others arses.
fritspas 3 months ago
love it!
ncfatcyclist 5 months ago
I trust you all more than anything but u should have put a hand on the led just to show us the sound stopped! BTW i am gna try that in college tomo!! let me just get my hands on some of that glass tube thingy...hmm...
kruelkiller 6 months ago
Is that a LP custom at 3:17 ??
kruelkiller 6 months ago
Loved the demonstration of how optic fiber works.
damianpaz 7 months ago
:)
xsni 8 months ago
This is amazing,
Keep uploading as much as your Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line allows you to
jimo1150 9 months ago
Eagerly awaiting your video on the cabbage diet
Every1Tubes 9 months ago
I got a letter also.....but it wasn't from the Nobel Prize committee.
chairde 1 year ago
Can someone explain how to make this circuit?
454894894465465 1 year ago
@454894894465465: Just google "light to LED modulator". There are kits and simple circuits.
puncheex 1 year ago
Excellent - The best demonstration so far. (5:19)
31428571J 1 year ago
immediately recalled Feynman's voice in my head saying "who else is worthy to join this wonderful group that we are" while he was talking about his Nobel Prize and how he bothered with the way it is conducted.
watch?v=f61KMw5zVhg
but also happy that he was right again :)
imperatives21 1 year ago
WAIT!! ...so the swirling lights at the bottom of a pool of water isn't the light coming down from above; its the light reflected from the bottom of the pool and then bouncing back again from the underside of the waters surface. '8o
temporaldisplacement 1 year ago
@temporaldisplacement: Some are, some aren't. The "shimmering pool in the darkness " effect is indirect underwater lighting partially reflecting off the undersurface of the water.
puncheex 1 year ago
More of a demonstration.
Freshman000000 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what is that at the end, a crappy opto compressor he made with and LED and a glass tube? way cool.
minus00 2 years ago
diet pills...yuck
jackshay01 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What can they do to you if you break the secrecy requirements?
Envergure 2 years ago
@Envergure: Strike you off the list of people they send to, and never award you a Nobel.
puncheex 1 year ago
I wanna try that experiment!
drokles 2 years ago
i just don't understand how a complex unique piece of sound, complete with its own particular timbre, tempo, pitch, distortions, amplitude etc can be transmitted via something as crude as a flashing LED??! Can someone explain how it works? how does so much continuous information (in multiple planes) get transmitted vis a flashing light which is only continuous in one plane. ie on, off and everything in between. someone explain please!
simba00784 2 years ago
timbre, tempo, pitch, distortions.. are just ways of describing our perception of sound. What you say is multiple planes, since sound is a wave are: velocity, frequency, amplitude and wavelength. Velocity of sound is constant, when velocity is constant, frequency is dependent on wavelength. We are left with two planes; frequency and amplitude. Amplitude is the diode's brightness, frequency is it's speed of change. The amplitude can be changed by the volume.
Freshman000000 2 years ago 2
ahh ok, how interesting.- so every sound at any given moment can be described by a particular wave. Putting many of these waves together in sequence and we got a sound that we interpret as a complex sound. Since, velocity is constant and wavelength depends on frequency (and vice versa), then we only have frequency and amplitude information which needs to be transmitted. thanks. This also explains how something as simple of string can transmit sound with 2 cups attached to either end
simba00784 2 years ago
Fiber Optics(Internet) and CCD(All imaging period these days) are hands down deserving of this reward. These are technologies through the research of physics that have advanced all of mankind.
525047 2 years ago 3
Quantum Mechanics and String Theory are mathematical systems to describe what we essentially don't understand but can predict. It's just very hard to justify to the committee the beauty of numbers that for all intensive purposes don't have any use for mankind. If you can make a practical quantum computer by scratching on a chalkboard then you'll get a Nobel Prize. Just don't be surprised by industry dominated technologies winning.
525047 2 years ago
@525047: "...that for all intents and purposes don't have any use for mankind".
Einstein's general and special theories of relativity; Darwin's theory of evolution; the discovery of the structure of DNA; the development of quantum mechanics; the literature of Herta Mueller (this year's Nobel prize-winner for Literature); the discovery of the cosmic microwave background....
All of "no use" to mankind without technological/commercial application...?
Philip Moriarty (speaking @ ~ 3:15)
Moriarty2112 2 years ago
@simba00784: Any combination of sound sources are all eventually added up in the ear/microphone) to form a single waveform in time. It contains the entire information content of the sum of the original sources; this is probably best seen on old-style LP records, where the wavering of the needle in the groove plays back the entire symphony orchestra. In digital forms like a CD, the waveform is sampled at some rate (such as 44,000 times per sec) and the raw numbers are stored in a .wav file.
puncheex 1 year ago
... Note that some information in the individual sources may be lost in the summation; a trumpet might override a triangle's ting, for example. Distortion might intervene once the sources are summed, and the digitization inevitably leads to loss of very high frequencies (hopefully beyond hearing anyway). There's many a slip twixt the cup and the lip.
puncheex 1 year ago
Light, like sound, has three qualities: frequency, amplitude, and a third quality you might call 'saturation' i.e. how many of the photons/sound waves are reaching the target. Sound may seem complex, but it's really just a wave, much like a radio wave (althought not actually the same). The LED doesn't just turn on and off, it can vary in brightness based on the voltage.
Digeridude 2 years ago
Love Sixty Symbols
Grey80002 2 years ago
@3:25
I'm interested in atoms and how the universe works, but I don't think I'd ever be happy researching them.
What excites me as much as that, is the prospect of taking that theoretical physics and turning it into something practical.
Kudos for working in that field, though.
Rakyth 2 years ago
what camera do u have?you, the dude who makes the videos for the university plz answer :P
JaksProductions 2 years ago
is that experment real? turning sound in to light and back again. that just sounds crazy. amazing!
olympussound 2 years ago 2
If you think about it, computer microphones/speakers convert sound into electricity and then back into sound.
In this case sound (the person speaking) --> electric current (via microphone) --> electromagnetic waves (radio tower/amplifier) --> electric current (the radio) --> light --> electric current again --> sound!
Qtyled 2 years ago
correction CCD allow lights to be capture, not store. :P :D
blade9z 2 years ago
actually, 00144 is US Zip (Postal) code for UK. So the question is, why does this bear a US PostNet Barcode when it is supposedly coming from Sweden?
joel4692 2 years ago
you can do both, Nikola Tesla found deep fundamental knowledge of electricity and built very practical applications
I know there are physicts like Einstein that don't concern themselves with the practical but being able to use something on a practical basis seems to me to reinforce the correctness of the underlying theory
JerryKitich 2 years ago
@JerryKitich: It's worth remembering that Einstein won the Nobel prize not for relativity but for his work on the photoelectric effect. It is the photoelectric effect which underpins the operation of the CCD.
This is one example, of countless many, where fundamental and applied physics "feed" off each other. So, in that sense, I agree with you.
Nevertheless, I'm of the opinion that the words "physics" and "technology" are not synonymous!
Philip Moriarty (speaking at ~ 02:45 in video)
Moriarty2112 2 years ago 2
@Moriarity I agree with you I don't think physics means technology either - I was aware of what Einstein won his prize for and I'm also aware the gave the prize money to his first wife and his children
I have read though that Einstein had almost no interest in practical applications
I completely support physics doing fundamental research but it may also be worth remembering that Tesla was lighting up the worlds fair well with AC well before Rutherford's atomic fundamental experiments
JerryKitich 2 years ago
@JerryKitich: How then did Einstein come to patent (along with Leo Szilard) a refrigerator?
This is a bit facetious; it is said that Szilard did most of the work, while Einstein consulted and did the patent paperwork (having some experience at patents, don't you know?).
puncheex 1 year ago
crude but effective demo...
Paxmax 2 years ago
well maybe if you stopped with the theories and got on with the facts they would consider you
sirnicholson 2 years ago
Sweet! Loved the demonstration.
harshm2u 2 years ago 2
we need more physics videos like this! more on technologies please!
pboyski 2 years ago 11
Impressive fiber optic demonstration! I meant to ask this last night... the setup looks remarkably simple, much simpler than I imagined the sender and receiver to be. Would you mind sharing a hint/link on how to recreate this experiment?
celeph 2 years ago
@celeph: the ones used in computer applications are similar to these in concept, but there is a lot of tech wrapped up in maintaining high speeds over long distances.
puncheex 1 year ago
That's insane. Crazy how light can 'carry' information.
petercourt 2 years ago
we wouldn't be seeing any of this if it couldn't.
Keimori12 2 years ago 2
That demonstration at the end was brilliant. I do agree with the decisions for Nobel Prize for Physics, the one for fiber optics is WAY overdue.
nurikosguardian 2 years ago 26
@nurikosguardian my favourite internal reflection demostrations are withe water jets and shooting a laser within the light and watching the laser light bend with the water
derickhaywood 1 year ago
@nurikosguardian I think you will find that is always the case with the nobel prize :P
Edwin Hubble actually died right before they where to announce him as a winner of it :/
LamaPaj 5 months ago
kool
cookiecamp 2 years ago
What type of guitar do you play? It's at 2.30. I know this isn't a obvious physics qutestion but i'm interested in the sound waves it produces :-)
Bluebuthappy182 2 years ago
@Bluebuthappy182: It's a really, really cheap (~£100) Les Paul copy! Prof. Bowley and I discuss the physics of waves in the Sixty Symbols video on Fourier analysis.
Best wishes,
Philip Moriarty
Moriarty2112 2 years ago
@polonium9
Ok. But then a laser pointer would be even more impressing, because you can see the beam because of impurites inside the glass. If you have a laser pointer and a piece of PMMA you can try it yourself.
superdau 2 years ago
Impressing from 04:57 on.
workforcetrust 2 years ago
My School in Germany got the Atlas of creation as well. 10 copies of about 6 kilos of crap. But yea, it has nice pictures.
DannyOo 2 years ago
The experiment at the end was great :D
imover18gotityube 2 years ago 2
great job, again.
WE LOVE THESE VIDEO'S!!!!
MORE MORE MORE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(sorry, immature moment)
bng44270 2 years ago
its good to see sixty symbols posting videos again
DarthEvilicus 2 years ago 13
@DarthEvilicus: Another 59 on the way!
sixtysymbols 2 years ago 13
@sixtysymbols I really liked this one - thanks for doing these! I know it's a lot of work, but we appreciate it!
jasonguyperson 1 year ago
Atlas of creation? 4:26
Yony42 2 years ago 2
@Yony42: Professor Merrifield made a video for us about why this is on his shelf... the video is on our channel called nottinghamscience and titled "Atlas of Creation".
sixtysymbols 2 years ago 2
Thanks!
Yony42 2 years ago
he got it for free from some islamist fundamentalists but it had some nice pictures so he kept it ;)
clarkcolt45 2 years ago
LOLz agreed!
djdevil360 2 years ago
wow! Optical fibre is amazing! didn't expect it to work like that!
OhYeahMilkIt 2 years ago 4
I think I'll just plug my hi fi into a socket if you don't mind.
PERSONIFICATIONOFYAY 2 years ago
Thankyou. Clear, concise and precise.
Infloresence 2 years ago
I am so proud that Charles Kao from Hong Kong won the Nobel Prize because I come from Hong Kong also!
loky1992 2 years ago
Thank god you posted a video ! i've been studying high school biology so much that i actually felt my brain shutting down !!
solomsolomol 2 years ago
The Cabbage Diet... O_o
TickleExpress 2 years ago 2
Optical fibre is just so amazing.
FaintSnow 2 years ago
ehhhhhh i got nobel prize in Electrical Engineering
thedetective22 2 years ago
I had 3 but I sold one on Ebay
culwin 2 years ago
Sweeeet! I never knew of such experiment showing how fiber-optics work! Great video!!!
NAMLegolas 2 years ago 2
I love your channel! I'm no theoretical physicist but this stuff in incredibly interesting; thanks!!!
jesse0192 2 years ago 2
A torch wouldn't really be working, because you can't modulate incadescent bulbs fast enough. The filament glows and has to heat up and cool down to change brightness, which (I estimate) takes a few tenth of a second. But for voice you would have to be able to switch the light on and off a few hundred times per second. A LED is off instantly (at least when considering the audible frequency range).
superdau 2 years ago 2
demo was incredible!! Can we get circuit diagrams of that?
MSI2k 2 years ago 2
The LED part seems to be a simple transistor amplifier circuit. The receiver would be an current-to-voltage converter using an operational amplifier. These are both very basic circuits. If you know how to read a circuit diagram, you should be able to find many examples online, if you don't get a diagram here.
superdau 2 years ago
If you've got a radio with enough grunt it'll drive the LED directly.
RupertsCrystals 2 years ago
Wow! Intelligent stuff on youtube!!
Refreshing!
But hard to compete with breasts and skateboards!
TheJapanChannelDcom 2 years ago
Your MAMA!!!!!
Oh ya I forgot: you suck!!
1trip711 2 years ago
Very interesting. I love Physics. I wish they did experiments like that fiber optics one at my school.
Chipsonfire 2 years ago
Do you know why all Nobel Prizes are awarded in Sweden?
Amiryfey 2 years ago
Alfred Nobel was from stockholm.
K2Tanner 2 years ago
Never knew that the Noble prizes where voted on by people around the world before they end up in a committee. Thanks!
InfectedDaemon 2 years ago
@InfectedDaemon: the awards themselves are not. The nominations are.
puncheex 1 year ago
fastinating especialy the ccd part
T1carus 2 years ago
that fiber optic demo was Awesome!
archaedemos 2 years ago 3
i was discussing fibre optics with some videographers and this for minuture camera work is ideal and a wonder how we havent used it before so well done the inventors and Bell Labs for ccd, good vid
crimsoncoin 2 years ago
yeah wow i didn't know that
sapientiamcarpe 2 years ago
Wow.
whitehiliter 2 years ago 2