The southerners are proud of their racist heritage. They still hate Lincoln for what he did and are even more upset by the first African American president. Maybe things will change someday?
Yes, Obama most certainly has changed the tax structure to effectively take from the productive and hand to the non-productive. THAT IS SOCIALISM, and it is completely incompatible with our Capitalist way of life. It also threatens true freedom and civil liberties because it allows government to decide who gets what. We should have NO tax at all! The income tax has only been around since 1913. We have plenty of places to get money without taxing the populace.
Obama is nothing more than a statist politician. His policies are just as bad as Bush's or what McCain would have brought. Obama is NOT the 'Saint' everyone thinks he is. His cabinet is absolutely TERRIBLE. He ran on an 'anti-war' platform, yet he has assembled complete warmongers around him, chief of which is Rahm Emanuel, a Jewish Zionist, Israeli partisan and warmonger. Both Biden and Holebrook are also warmongers, as is Hillary Clinton. So, how is Obama going to stay out of war?
Obama was anti the Iraq war. Not nessecarily anti war =\.
Politicians are very clever people. But I support him because I'd rather at least a change in economic policy if nothing else. McCain was promising to do what Bush did to get us into this mess.
OH NO HE WASN'T! He emphatically stated that he would keep us out of useless wars and practice true non-interventionism. He also said he is for dialogue with potential "enemy nations" instead of outright attacking them preemptively. He's now backpeddling on that promise. His economic policy is NO DIFFERENT than the policies that have bankrupted this economy. He is the same 'Borrow & Spend" politician as the rest and wants rampant Socialism throughout our system. That is going to ruin us!
His policies are completely different from Bush's. I don't know what you're talking about. Furthermore, the only Socailist idea he has made is to change the tax structure, which is nothing new because the Income Tax has been a progressive tax (higher rate for higher incomes) since it existed - look it up on the IRS' website.
As of yet he technically can't backpedal on the promise, while his cabinet choices are certainly interesting, he hasn't had a need to attack anyone new. We'll have to see.
OK, let me educate you. Both Lincoln and Bush were for enhancing the power of government. Both killed Habeas Corpus. Both were statists. Both had open contempt for the Constitution and violated it at will. Both gave extraordinary powers to themselves during wartime by bullying Congress. Both violated the Bill of Rights. Both engaged in illegal wars. Both usurped Civil Liberties. Both exuded vicious contempt for criticism of their policies. Lincoln went so far as arresting critics!
No, only brain-dead Neocon lap-dogs who have no heartfelt tie to the South (if they ever did). No true Southerner would DARE vote in such unconstitutional acts. The Southern States have been infected with people from other parts of the country who are NOT Southerners or simply Scalawags.
Well, remember, our ancestors were under the 'Bush' of the 1860's, Abraham Lincoln. Both Bush and Lincoln were exactly the same. Their policies were almost identical. They both share the dubious honor of legislation which canceled Habeas Corpus, they were both intolerant of criticism, they launched illegal, immoral wars, and they were both Fascists at heart and deed. Disliking Bush comes easy after a cretin like Lincoln.
Lincoln did NOT "end slavery." That's one of the many fallacies of his history. Slavery was ending all over the Western world, including the States. In 1863 only 5% of Southerners (plantation owners) had slaves, and the Industrial Revolution was about to end all that. Lincoln did MANY "wrong things." He was a tyrant and demagogue. He was a terrible president and worse 'American.' He had the same contempt for the Constitution as did Bush.
You said he "gets credit" which is the same thing, isn't it? With only 5% of the entire Southern population slave owners, don't you think that pretty much "rejects" slavery?
They're not the same thing. People get credit for what they didn't do all the time. Has happened to me quite often.
The 5% thing was because of wealth. I do understand the statistics, but I've also looked at media from the time and the south insisted that slavery was "good".
I do understand that Lincoln didn't really free the slaves, or at least not for slavery. The Emancipation Proclamation was a war tactic, that's all.
Then who gets "credit" for ending slavery? How can "Lincoln" get "credit" for ending slavery if you say he didn't? That doesn't make sense to me, but no matter. Whatever "media" you're quoting from you need to disgard it because the South NEVER said "slavery was good." And, you're implying that if all Southerners were "wealthy" they'd have slaves. That's rubbish. There were lots of "wealthy" Soutnerners who did not own slaves. The Planters owned slaves to work the plantation.
He gets credit because of 1. The Emancipation Proclamation and 2. the 13th Amendment. While yes, any president at the time would have make the 13th Amendment after they won the war.
I've seen it plenty of times, and its stuff from school, not what a guy on youtube told me. At first it was "bad, but necessary" but then people started to insist that it was "good".
While there were SOME wealthy southerners with no slaves, obviously, the majority of southerners who could afford a slave owned one.
Actually, both Douglass and Lincoln's own political expediency should be given "credit" for the Emancipation Proc. And Delaware, New Jersey, Maryland, and Kentucky were exempt rom the 13th and allowed to continue slavery. Three of the four 'Union' states. Hmm. And you believe what they teach you in "school?" You're "schooling" is wrong. No Southerner stated slavery was "good." It was both necessary and an accepted practice during those days, albeit waning. Northerners also owned slaves.
However I don't think just ditching the rest of the country (which is just as pissed off about the last 8 years) is the right solution. Not only does it create more problems, international issues, and what not, it's kind of insulting. "Screw you guys, I'm going home".
Instead of just leaving, try to work with what are, in the end, your fellow American citizens to get what we want in the government. I'm fairly liberal (from Seattle) and there's many things I agree with your side on.
There's nothing immoral or shameful about secession. The Founders even allowed for it in the Constitution since they themselves Seceded from Britain. America is too far gone to save. Secession would be best for our part of the country since we've never really been an integral part since the end of Lincoln's war. We all want out anyway, and we think we can govern ourselves better than Washington can. We sure can't do any worse.
I would question that we've only had ONE bad president, but all it takes is ONE to wreck a nation. Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, Stalin, Mao, Ceauşescu, etc. However, we have seen a succession of bad presidents starting with Lincoln. Every modern president since Wilson has engaged in some kind of 'me too' statis which has culminated in the downfall we are seeing today. Obama will be no different and, in fact, may be much worse. I'd just as soon leave and take my chances. So would we all.
First, you can cut out Texas as being part of the South. They sold out years ago. And Missouri? They never were part of us. Only northern Florida including the Panhandle is 'Southern' any more. Tennessee supports anti-Southern scum like Al Gore, so they're out. I've never heard a peep out of West Virginia either pro or con. So, the true map of Dixie will look a lot different than the one depicted in this video.
so your map would be virginia, (perhaps west virginia), kentucky, north/south carolina, arkansas, louisiana, mississippi, alabama, georgia, and north florida?
Organize a group or groups within your own state. Then make some connection within other states with people of like mind. We need a reliable form of communication between groups and states. We can't rely upon the internet for that. Too many eyes and ears, and it could be taken down with realitive ease.
Good advice, bro. SLMN will aid any local pro-South group of honorable repute that wishes to make a stand. Let us know about your local group & we'll try to help spread the word.
Organize. Ready ourselves and our families and friends. We have to use this time we've been allotted to do these things and bind our people together as a single people pushing for self-determination.
Great educating Video,The truth shall set us FREE.Yes the time is now.And I Believe we must work harder but also every one has a job to do,use every strength we have to make it possible.Fight for the right,do what we must but always remember in God we trust Deo Vindice!
In 1776 our Founding Fathers risked their "lives,fortunes,and sacred honor"to establish a free and prosperous nation.They warned us that it was our responsibility to keep it that way,but today we have stood by and let political powers corrupt gone strayed from their wise counsel."Freedom",Liberty,Dixie,"DEO VINDICE!
We must pull together and start educating the South First.'We the People'of DIXIE must stay dedicated to educating Our People'about the treasonous attacks,attempts to end the expressed freedoms of our Constitution and Bill of Rights in order to stop creating the NAU.
Council On Foreign Relations;Compromising American Sovereignty.Ever wonder why they don't enforce immigration laws;2 Patriot Act Provisions Ruled Unlawful-September 26,2007 Knowledge is POWER."STOP the **NAU-North American Union and the treasonous powers.
I know why they don't close the boarders. The US is just a title. We are the NAU right now. The boarders have been softened to the point of non-existence. Individual states will soon be abolished and turned into regions. The UN flag will fly over all. There just waiting for a certain age group to be consumed, and the remaining are lost.
All truth you speak and after watching AARON RUSSO'S must see movie AMERICA Freedom to Fascism a Startling Examination Exposes the Systemic Erosion of our Civil Liberties."A cinematic call to arms!"Said:-Jeff Craig,Sixty Second Preview.Freedom for "Dixie"Deo Vindice!
Sir you are absoultely correct. There are people and organazations all over these united states. All know what is coming real soon. The real trick is to get them all together as a collective unit.
Hey red what happened to the Arkansas Traveler? I haven't seen any videos on him in awhile.
Luigi84289 1 month ago
@Luigi84289 He did a few videos a couple years ago. He is still around. I occasionally hear from him. I think he's doing well.
RedShirtArmy 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The southerners are proud of their racist heritage. They still hate Lincoln for what he did and are even more upset by the first African American president. Maybe things will change someday?
OrganNLou 8 months ago
I hope you guys don't think Barack Obama is the savior either.....
tachikoma747 1 year ago
Yes, Obama most certainly has changed the tax structure to effectively take from the productive and hand to the non-productive. THAT IS SOCIALISM, and it is completely incompatible with our Capitalist way of life. It also threatens true freedom and civil liberties because it allows government to decide who gets what. We should have NO tax at all! The income tax has only been around since 1913. We have plenty of places to get money without taxing the populace.
19Truth53 3 years ago
Obama is nothing more than a statist politician. His policies are just as bad as Bush's or what McCain would have brought. Obama is NOT the 'Saint' everyone thinks he is. His cabinet is absolutely TERRIBLE. He ran on an 'anti-war' platform, yet he has assembled complete warmongers around him, chief of which is Rahm Emanuel, a Jewish Zionist, Israeli partisan and warmonger. Both Biden and Holebrook are also warmongers, as is Hillary Clinton. So, how is Obama going to stay out of war?
19Truth53 3 years ago
Obama was anti the Iraq war. Not nessecarily anti war =\.
Politicians are very clever people. But I support him because I'd rather at least a change in economic policy if nothing else. McCain was promising to do what Bush did to get us into this mess.
verxintRising 3 years ago
OH NO HE WASN'T! He emphatically stated that he would keep us out of useless wars and practice true non-interventionism. He also said he is for dialogue with potential "enemy nations" instead of outright attacking them preemptively. He's now backpeddling on that promise. His economic policy is NO DIFFERENT than the policies that have bankrupted this economy. He is the same 'Borrow & Spend" politician as the rest and wants rampant Socialism throughout our system. That is going to ruin us!
19Truth53 3 years ago
His policies are completely different from Bush's. I don't know what you're talking about. Furthermore, the only Socailist idea he has made is to change the tax structure, which is nothing new because the Income Tax has been a progressive tax (higher rate for higher incomes) since it existed - look it up on the IRS' website.
As of yet he technically can't backpedal on the promise, while his cabinet choices are certainly interesting, he hasn't had a need to attack anyone new. We'll have to see.
verxintRising 3 years ago
OK, let me educate you. Both Lincoln and Bush were for enhancing the power of government. Both killed Habeas Corpus. Both were statists. Both had open contempt for the Constitution and violated it at will. Both gave extraordinary powers to themselves during wartime by bullying Congress. Both violated the Bill of Rights. Both engaged in illegal wars. Both usurped Civil Liberties. Both exuded vicious contempt for criticism of their policies. Lincoln went so far as arresting critics!
19Truth53 3 years ago
just shows whos "really" in charge. Damn bankers. Wilson screwed us all.
Luigi84289 2 years ago
Well heres something from West Virginia Sir... DEO VINDICE!!!
WestVirginian7 3 years ago
It's funny that you can be angry at the Patriot act when ALL the states in the south voted FOR the man who made that act.
verxintRising 3 years ago
No, only brain-dead Neocon lap-dogs who have no heartfelt tie to the South (if they ever did). No true Southerner would DARE vote in such unconstitutional acts. The Southern States have been infected with people from other parts of the country who are NOT Southerners or simply Scalawags.
19Truth53 3 years ago
Must not be a lot of southerners left then..
verxintRising 3 years ago
Unfortunately, you are correct.
19Truth53 3 years ago
Well if a true southerner can realize how stupid Bush and his ideas are, then you guys aren't so bad.
verxintRising 3 years ago
Well, remember, our ancestors were under the 'Bush' of the 1860's, Abraham Lincoln. Both Bush and Lincoln were exactly the same. Their policies were almost identical. They both share the dubious honor of legislation which canceled Habeas Corpus, they were both intolerant of criticism, they launched illegal, immoral wars, and they were both Fascists at heart and deed. Disliking Bush comes easy after a cretin like Lincoln.
19Truth53 3 years ago
I see, I guess. I know Lincoln did some wrong things but was president at the time so he gets the credit for ending slavery.
Can I ask what you think of Obama?
verxintRising 3 years ago
Lincoln did NOT "end slavery." That's one of the many fallacies of his history. Slavery was ending all over the Western world, including the States. In 1863 only 5% of Southerners (plantation owners) had slaves, and the Industrial Revolution was about to end all that. Lincoln did MANY "wrong things." He was a tyrant and demagogue. He was a terrible president and worse 'American.' He had the same contempt for the Constitution as did Bush.
19Truth53 3 years ago
Read my comment, I never said he was ending slavery.
Even if the CSA had successfully formed, the world was rejecting slavery and they would have had to end it.
verxintRising 3 years ago
You said he "gets credit" which is the same thing, isn't it? With only 5% of the entire Southern population slave owners, don't you think that pretty much "rejects" slavery?
19Truth53 3 years ago
They're not the same thing. People get credit for what they didn't do all the time. Has happened to me quite often.
The 5% thing was because of wealth. I do understand the statistics, but I've also looked at media from the time and the south insisted that slavery was "good".
I do understand that Lincoln didn't really free the slaves, or at least not for slavery. The Emancipation Proclamation was a war tactic, that's all.
verxintRising 3 years ago
Then who gets "credit" for ending slavery? How can "Lincoln" get "credit" for ending slavery if you say he didn't? That doesn't make sense to me, but no matter. Whatever "media" you're quoting from you need to disgard it because the South NEVER said "slavery was good." And, you're implying that if all Southerners were "wealthy" they'd have slaves. That's rubbish. There were lots of "wealthy" Soutnerners who did not own slaves. The Planters owned slaves to work the plantation.
19Truth53 3 years ago
He gets credit because of 1. The Emancipation Proclamation and 2. the 13th Amendment. While yes, any president at the time would have make the 13th Amendment after they won the war.
I've seen it plenty of times, and its stuff from school, not what a guy on youtube told me. At first it was "bad, but necessary" but then people started to insist that it was "good".
While there were SOME wealthy southerners with no slaves, obviously, the majority of southerners who could afford a slave owned one.
verxintRising 3 years ago
Actually, both Douglass and Lincoln's own political expediency should be given "credit" for the Emancipation Proc. And Delaware, New Jersey, Maryland, and Kentucky were exempt rom the 13th and allowed to continue slavery. Three of the four 'Union' states. Hmm. And you believe what they teach you in "school?" You're "schooling" is wrong. No Southerner stated slavery was "good." It was both necessary and an accepted practice during those days, albeit waning. Northerners also owned slaves.
19Truth53 3 years ago
However I don't think just ditching the rest of the country (which is just as pissed off about the last 8 years) is the right solution. Not only does it create more problems, international issues, and what not, it's kind of insulting. "Screw you guys, I'm going home".
Instead of just leaving, try to work with what are, in the end, your fellow American citizens to get what we want in the government. I'm fairly liberal (from Seattle) and there's many things I agree with your side on.
verxintRising 3 years ago
There's nothing immoral or shameful about secession. The Founders even allowed for it in the Constitution since they themselves Seceded from Britain. America is too far gone to save. Secession would be best for our part of the country since we've never really been an integral part since the end of Lincoln's war. We all want out anyway, and we think we can govern ourselves better than Washington can. We sure can't do any worse.
19Truth53 3 years ago
I still feel that just one bad president doesn't mean the country is screwed over.
verxintRising 3 years ago
I would question that we've only had ONE bad president, but all it takes is ONE to wreck a nation. Hitler, Mussolini, Tojo, Stalin, Mao, Ceauşescu, etc. However, we have seen a succession of bad presidents starting with Lincoln. Every modern president since Wilson has engaged in some kind of 'me too' statis which has culminated in the downfall we are seeing today. Obama will be no different and, in fact, may be much worse. I'd just as soon leave and take my chances. So would we all.
19Truth53 3 years ago
First, you can cut out Texas as being part of the South. They sold out years ago. And Missouri? They never were part of us. Only northern Florida including the Panhandle is 'Southern' any more. Tennessee supports anti-Southern scum like Al Gore, so they're out. I've never heard a peep out of West Virginia either pro or con. So, the true map of Dixie will look a lot different than the one depicted in this video.
19Truth53 3 years ago
so your map would be virginia, (perhaps west virginia), kentucky, north/south carolina, arkansas, louisiana, mississippi, alabama, georgia, and north florida?
oak91td 3 years ago
Yep
19Truth53 3 years ago
bro i was in this store today,,,
danielstwin 3 years ago
IM A REBEL ALL THE WAY I LIVE IN SWEET HOME ALABAMA WE NEED TO FIGHT BACK!!!! Who is with me??
REBEL4DIXIE 3 years ago
Love Dixie The people are so loyal.
WhereEaglesDareUK 3 years ago 8
Organize a group or groups within your own state. Then make some connection within other states with people of like mind. We need a reliable form of communication between groups and states. We can't rely upon the internet for that. Too many eyes and ears, and it could be taken down with realitive ease.
Arkben4south 4 years ago 4
Good advice, bro. SLMN will aid any local pro-South group of honorable repute that wishes to make a stand. Let us know about your local group & we'll try to help spread the word.
RedShirtArmy 4 years ago
We must fight agaisnt tyranny.
vilaboastream 4 years ago 7
it has to start somewhere. great job, and I'm a yankee!
witzkeyman 4 years ago 3
What must be done? Tell us what to do if and when the bullets start flying??
nomadak47 4 years ago 2
Organize. Ready ourselves and our families and friends. We have to use this time we've been allotted to do these things and bind our people together as a single people pushing for self-determination.
RedShirtArmy 4 years ago
Great educating Video,The truth shall set us FREE.Yes the time is now.And I Believe we must work harder but also every one has a job to do,use every strength we have to make it possible.Fight for the right,do what we must but always remember in God we trust Deo Vindice!
southernhistory 4 years ago
In 1776 our Founding Fathers risked their "lives,fortunes,and sacred honor"to establish a free and prosperous nation.They warned us that it was our responsibility to keep it that way,but today we have stood by and let political powers corrupt gone strayed from their wise counsel."Freedom",Liberty,Dixie,"DEO VINDICE!
southernhistory 4 years ago
We must pull together and start educating the South First.'We the People'of DIXIE must stay dedicated to educating Our People'about the treasonous attacks,attempts to end the expressed freedoms of our Constitution and Bill of Rights in order to stop creating the NAU.
southernhistory 4 years ago
Council On Foreign Relations;Compromising American Sovereignty.Ever wonder why they don't enforce immigration laws;2 Patriot Act Provisions Ruled Unlawful-September 26,2007 Knowledge is POWER."STOP the **NAU-North American Union and the treasonous powers.
southernhistory 4 years ago
I know why they don't close the boarders. The US is just a title. We are the NAU right now. The boarders have been softened to the point of non-existence. Individual states will soon be abolished and turned into regions. The UN flag will fly over all. There just waiting for a certain age group to be consumed, and the remaining are lost.
Arkben4south 4 years ago 2
...and the battle begins...
RedShirtArmy 4 years ago
And also gives corporations cheap labor as well.
nomadak47 4 years ago
All truth you speak and after watching AARON RUSSO'S must see movie AMERICA Freedom to Fascism a Startling Examination Exposes the Systemic Erosion of our Civil Liberties."A cinematic call to arms!"Said:-Jeff Craig,Sixty Second Preview.Freedom for "Dixie"Deo Vindice!
southernhistory 4 years ago
The would be more than just the traditional southern states with us this time!
SpringHeeledJack4U 4 years ago 3
Sir you are absoultely correct. There are people and organazations all over these united states. All know what is coming real soon. The real trick is to get them all together as a collective unit.
Arkben4south 4 years ago 2
Ben, great job on this video, bro. I salute you... Deo Vindice!
RedShirtArmy 4 years ago
Here's a strong message from the Arkansas Traveler.
It's time for us to be free. Deo Vindice!
RedShirtArmy 4 years ago