If the moon were hollow with a black hole center then it would have been destroyed long ago from meteor impacts, probably one as small as 10m would have enough force to smash through and destabilize it. I suppose people are welcome to believe whatever they want... may as well say purple bunnies live inside the hollow moon though.
"Gravity is just magnetism"? WTF is going on in your head. Have you never held a magnet before? Ever wonder why metal is lifted off the ground to a magnet? That would mean that the massive earth has 'less' gravity/magnetism than a tiny 1 ounce magnet. Think about the world around you before you start spouting off things.
if NASA said all this, no one would say this presentation was bullshit.
i am absolutely positive we are in the middle of a giant game of marbles and the moon is about to crash in on some kinda interplanetary jackpot, my niggas. fool head, be dope, clashin up ginst da ert like dat!!
im not as educated as most of you but the hollow moon theory does not sit well with me, a black hole perched at the centre of it must be affected by the earths gravity as much as our tides are affected by the moons, therfore it cant remain central an would therefor technically eat its way out.
@CerebralInterface It's starting to make me very sad seeing just how many people are sucked into these various hoaxes and scams. A mate summed it up the other night "They DESERVE for their to be reptilians living in the moon trying to enslave them, if that's what they believe then, fuck, they deserve it to be true."
People are just so fucking easy to fool and manipulate, it's just sad.
I always notice how very accurare theories (like the hollow moon) are always damaged by attachments that make the explanation then seem ludicrous also. Intentional, I believe it is.
@stoneman289 So a blackhole inside the moon is comedy...... but reptilian jewish illuminati using it as a base to broadcast mind-control beams from isn't? righto lol.
spooky a few months back i had a dream the moon was blacked and pulled earth into it. but really how would a black whole get there and how would the shell be created ? Thought provoking as it was, it does sound ludicrous.
Based on what physics tells us, and how celestial bodies are formed(gravity), it is a scientific impossibility that any naturally formed celestial body can be hollow.
Now if youd like to argue that the moon was artificially created - engineered, by aliens(god?), that would more "reasonably" debated than this black hole theory presented here. You can debate it and support it with all the junk science and non-reality based techno-babel you like, but the reality of physics will always win.
There is nothing supporting the lunar crust in your model, which would cause it to fall into the black hole even if the gravity field were equivalent to the three layer model.
LOL That is the stupidest theory ive ever heard before in my life.HOw WOuLD A BLACK HOLE GET THERE!? Even if it was there a black hole the size of a Marble can Destroy earth!
All planets, including moons, must be hollow. If the interiors were solid iron and magnesium, the planets would fall like rocks through space. But if the interiors are hollow, they can rotate and the crusts bulge outward - which is what they do. it's called CENTRIFUGAL FORCE.
Furthermore, results from the Apache Point Lunar Laser Ranging Operation (Apollo), have determined that the core of the Moon is fluid, it is not hollow.
Why would this be wrong?
James G. Williams, Slava G. Turyshev, Dale H. Boggs and J. Todd Ratcliff. Lunar laser ranging science: Gravitational physics and lunar interior and geodesy. Advances in Space Research. Volume 37, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-71.
NASA left seismometers on the Moon. They recorded Moon quakes, meteorite impacts and the impact of Apollo space junk into the moon. This allowed scientists to determine the properties of the interior of the Moon, importantly they determined that the Moon is not hollow.
Do disagree with their conclusion, if so why?
Referance: Nakamura, Y., G. Latham, and H. Dorman (1982), Apollo Lunar Seismic Experiment—Final Summary, J. Geophys. Res., 87(S1), A117-A123.
the black hole hollow earth theory doesn't hold up to much scrutiny, it might be more believable to state that the moon is hollow and filled to the brim with heavy metal Class 3 tech and room for many thousands of critters.
Why is it that people endorsing conventional scientific models are invariably inclined to insult someone capable of independent thought by inferring that the person is unintelligent. Always this is done by recourse to the stupidest of linguistic insults (while idiotically Laughing One's Ass Off--which is itself impossible). I don't except the black hole theory, but at least it is an attempt to explain something which has yet to be explained. This is a good video, and maybe nearly true.
the second problem with your black hole theory is that black holes do not produce an even gravimetric field. this is why we see these great discs that form on their equator. this is from the shearing effects created by the black holes warped grav field. this shearing is so great that in fact. you would never make it even close to one before it tore you apart through a process jokingly called spegettification.
now as far as your little black hole theory goes. there is 2 main problems for you here. 1. one trait ALL black holes share is an abundant amount of X-rays being emitted. this is how we find them today actually, and X-rays will penetrate through anything basically. at very least we would see the moon glowing under an X-ray telescope. yet we see NO X-ray emissions. not even trace amounts.
the first part of your little theory assumes the moon is actually hollow, lol. no one in science thinks this is the case. rather it is thought that there are many hollow spots dotted throughout its outer surface. these hollow spots were caused by ice meteors that vaporized on impact trapping gases under the surface. the rest of the moon erosion is caused by a process called incessant meteor bombardment and solar radiation, period.
omfg! i've had farts with more common sense than this. about the only facts i saw in the whole vid was that there is actually a moon. after that... DUUUH! you have absolutely NO rational understanding of the moon or black holes for that matter.
@PaganBorn79 man i'm telling you! lmfao! all these dumb shits need to go back to their 6th grade science teacher and slap the fuck out of that bitch for having wronged them so.
My understanding is that a black hole's gravitational pull should only have polarity if it is rotating, so there is no reason to assume that this object should have anything but a homogeneous, evenly distributed, and non-directional event horizon. There is therefore no reason to assume that there would be any areas of particular instability on the surface of the moon, either an indentation or an especially mountanous region.
If the black hole were to be rotating, creating directionality within the event horizon, there is still no reason to assume that this effect would be observable from the exterior of the moon. Suppose the black hole and the moon rotate along a common axis (a reasonable assumption), then the forces acting on the poles of the moon from its rotation may well be enough to overcome the effects of the polar event horizon.
Keep in mind that to an observer beyond the event horizon, the net gravitational force of the black hole will necessarily be equivalent to that of the same mass distributed less densely within the bounds of the event horizon.
Perhaps I did not understand your questions properly. If that is the case, please rephrase your inquiries and elaborate upon any problems you see with what I have said here.
@CerebralInterface polarity is caused by the atomic spin, and that spin is around a black hole. Black holes are above the 3D matrix illusion and manifest themselves as voids of infinite magnetism as gravity is just magnetism. Magnetism ultimately is the power level to create reality, the stronger the magnetic power the higher levels of reality can be created. conscious interactions are decoded by the quantum brain differently at different quantum levels.
What forces would have to be present to perpetuate the cause a black hole inside a once solid object? Would there not be an event horizon with polarity causing the moon to cave and devour itself? Both spiriling inward and out as it rips one end of the moon and spews debri out its backside?
@devouredsoul I imagine not only would you see an indentation on the moon from the black hole, but a bubbling or round mountainous region from the reverse gravitational effect of a black hole. Push and pull?
I have made no hypothesis concerning the origin of this black hole, or of what forces may perpetuate it. Nor did I postulate that the moon was a once solid object. It may be informative for you to watch the video again, and make careful note of what specific claims are made.
Your questions concerning the effects this black hole would have on observable phenomena at the surface of the moon are of more interest.
@devouredsoul If the crust of the hollow moon exists beyond the event horizon of the black hole, then it should appear to an outside observer indistinguishable from a solid moon with a mass equivalent to the blackn hole dispersed evenly throughout its interior (ignoring, of course, the effects this would have on the moment of inertia, which would not effect most properties of the moon or its interaction with the Earth and other celestial bodies anyway).
If the moon were hollow with a black hole center then it would have been destroyed long ago from meteor impacts, probably one as small as 10m would have enough force to smash through and destabilize it. I suppose people are welcome to believe whatever they want... may as well say purple bunnies live inside the hollow moon though.
StylixDS 1 month ago
"Gravity is just magnetism"? WTF is going on in your head. Have you never held a magnet before? Ever wonder why metal is lifted off the ground to a magnet? That would mean that the massive earth has 'less' gravity/magnetism than a tiny 1 ounce magnet. Think about the world around you before you start spouting off things.
DrBandwidth 2 months ago
oh dear...
Televersity 2 months ago
Yeah black hole in a moon!How did it get incide?
LZ2SM 3 months ago
I hope you failed.
tempmike 3 months ago
Hollow brain.
ArabAstronomy 3 months ago 2
if NASA said all this, no one would say this presentation was bullshit.
i am absolutely positive we are in the middle of a giant game of marbles and the moon is about to crash in on some kinda interplanetary jackpot, my niggas. fool head, be dope, clashin up ginst da ert like dat!!
randallmckay 3 months ago
How the hell would a hollow sphere like that be created in the first place? Not to mention how the black hole got inside it.
markus031098 4 months ago
@markus031098 Quote from Arnold on the pyramid mine on mars."Aliens built it".lol.but yeah what the fuk.
PrvtParapup 4 months ago
im not as educated as most of you but the hollow moon theory does not sit well with me, a black hole perched at the centre of it must be affected by the earths gravity as much as our tides are affected by the moons, therfore it cant remain central an would therefor technically eat its way out.
2727MIK 5 months ago 2
It makes me sad that people take this seriously.
CerebralInterface 5 months ago 2
@CerebralInterface It's starting to make me very sad seeing just how many people are sucked into these various hoaxes and scams. A mate summed it up the other night "They DESERVE for their to be reptilians living in the moon trying to enslave them, if that's what they believe then, fuck, they deserve it to be true."
People are just so fucking easy to fool and manipulate, it's just sad.
mryellow123 3 months ago
@CerebralInterface i got a friend that is sure its true!!! hes telling me im a dumbass if i dont believe,lol...
ThaUnknownUniverse 2 months ago
It was my understanding that Black Holes don't move or spin.
Just saying...
toolshedjunky 5 months ago
I always notice how very accurare theories (like the hollow moon) are always damaged by attachments that make the explanation then seem ludicrous also. Intentional, I believe it is.
watershed44 5 months ago
i do actually believe in the hollow moon theory, BUT A BLACK HOLE ^.^.^.^.^.^.^ thats just comedy
stoneman289 5 months ago
@stoneman289 So a blackhole inside the moon is comedy...... but reptilian jewish illuminati using it as a base to broadcast mind-control beams from isn't? righto lol.
mryellow123 3 months ago
spooky a few months back i had a dream the moon was blacked and pulled earth into it. but really how would a black whole get there and how would the shell be created ? Thought provoking as it was, it does sound ludicrous.
Johanvideo525 6 months ago
Based on what physics tells us, and how celestial bodies are formed(gravity), it is a scientific impossibility that any naturally formed celestial body can be hollow.
Now if youd like to argue that the moon was artificially created - engineered, by aliens(god?), that would more "reasonably" debated than this black hole theory presented here. You can debate it and support it with all the junk science and non-reality based techno-babel you like, but the reality of physics will always win.
kree1964 6 months ago
There is nothing supporting the lunar crust in your model, which would cause it to fall into the black hole even if the gravity field were equivalent to the three layer model.
dEndiProductions 6 months ago
LOL That is the stupidest theory ive ever heard before in my life.HOw WOuLD A BLACK HOLE GET THERE!? Even if it was there a black hole the size of a Marble can Destroy earth!
davesofresh84 6 months ago 5
How would you get the black hole inside it ? The black hole would consume it in seconds, it's just not possible.
CMob09 7 months ago 2
@CMob09 Dumb, ey? These are the same people who believe in blackholes in the bermuda triangle.
Ruttie2 3 months ago
All planets, including moons, must be hollow. If the interiors were solid iron and magnesium, the planets would fall like rocks through space. But if the interiors are hollow, they can rotate and the crusts bulge outward - which is what they do. it's called CENTRIFUGAL FORCE.
xander7ful 7 months ago
Great music...What is it?
Indogyearsimdead 7 months ago
Furthermore, results from the Apache Point Lunar Laser Ranging Operation (Apollo), have determined that the core of the Moon is fluid, it is not hollow.
Why would this be wrong?
James G. Williams, Slava G. Turyshev, Dale H. Boggs and J. Todd Ratcliff. Lunar laser ranging science: Gravitational physics and lunar interior and geodesy. Advances in Space Research. Volume 37, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 67-71.
Diamonddavej 7 months ago
NASA left seismometers on the Moon. They recorded Moon quakes, meteorite impacts and the impact of Apollo space junk into the moon. This allowed scientists to determine the properties of the interior of the Moon, importantly they determined that the Moon is not hollow.
Do disagree with their conclusion, if so why?
Referance: Nakamura, Y., G. Latham, and H. Dorman (1982), Apollo Lunar Seismic Experiment—Final Summary, J. Geophys. Res., 87(S1), A117-A123.
Diamonddavej 7 months ago
@Diamonddavej Because they showed us footage of a flag blowing in the wind.
RevengeofShinobi1 7 months ago
The Earth is hollow also .
PYTHAGORAS101 7 months ago
the black hole hollow earth theory doesn't hold up to much scrutiny, it might be more believable to state that the moon is hollow and filled to the brim with heavy metal Class 3 tech and room for many thousands of critters.
hambino28 8 months ago
Why is it that people endorsing conventional scientific models are invariably inclined to insult someone capable of independent thought by inferring that the person is unintelligent. Always this is done by recourse to the stupidest of linguistic insults (while idiotically Laughing One's Ass Off--which is itself impossible). I don't except the black hole theory, but at least it is an attempt to explain something which has yet to be explained. This is a good video, and maybe nearly true.
gnomonclast 10 months ago
the second problem with your black hole theory is that black holes do not produce an even gravimetric field. this is why we see these great discs that form on their equator. this is from the shearing effects created by the black holes warped grav field. this shearing is so great that in fact. you would never make it even close to one before it tore you apart through a process jokingly called spegettification.
governmentcheese411 1 year ago
now as far as your little black hole theory goes. there is 2 main problems for you here. 1. one trait ALL black holes share is an abundant amount of X-rays being emitted. this is how we find them today actually, and X-rays will penetrate through anything basically. at very least we would see the moon glowing under an X-ray telescope. yet we see NO X-ray emissions. not even trace amounts.
governmentcheese411 1 year ago
the first part of your little theory assumes the moon is actually hollow, lol. no one in science thinks this is the case. rather it is thought that there are many hollow spots dotted throughout its outer surface. these hollow spots were caused by ice meteors that vaporized on impact trapping gases under the surface. the rest of the moon erosion is caused by a process called incessant meteor bombardment and solar radiation, period.
governmentcheese411 1 year ago
omfg! i've had farts with more common sense than this. about the only facts i saw in the whole vid was that there is actually a moon. after that... DUUUH! you have absolutely NO rational understanding of the moon or black holes for that matter.
governmentcheese411 1 year ago
@governmentcheese411 "omfg! i've had farts with more common sense than this" bahahahaha that's fucking hilarious because it's true.
PaganBorn79 1 year ago
@PaganBorn79 man i'm telling you! lmfao! all these dumb shits need to go back to their 6th grade science teacher and slap the fuck out of that bitch for having wronged them so.
governmentcheese411 1 year ago
@governmentcheese411 lmao That's govt. spending for you.
PaganBorn79 1 year ago
@PaganBorn79 that may have been government spending... but it wasn't for you or me.
governmentcheese411 1 year ago
now tell me this how in the world would a black hole get to the center of the moon evan if it is hollow
MEGA93M 1 year ago
My understanding is that a black hole's gravitational pull should only have polarity if it is rotating, so there is no reason to assume that this object should have anything but a homogeneous, evenly distributed, and non-directional event horizon. There is therefore no reason to assume that there would be any areas of particular instability on the surface of the moon, either an indentation or an especially mountanous region.
CerebralInterface 1 year ago
If the black hole were to be rotating, creating directionality within the event horizon, there is still no reason to assume that this effect would be observable from the exterior of the moon. Suppose the black hole and the moon rotate along a common axis (a reasonable assumption), then the forces acting on the poles of the moon from its rotation may well be enough to overcome the effects of the polar event horizon.
CerebralInterface 1 year ago
Keep in mind that to an observer beyond the event horizon, the net gravitational force of the black hole will necessarily be equivalent to that of the same mass distributed less densely within the bounds of the event horizon.
Perhaps I did not understand your questions properly. If that is the case, please rephrase your inquiries and elaborate upon any problems you see with what I have said here.
CerebralInterface 1 year ago
@CerebralInterface polarity is caused by the atomic spin, and that spin is around a black hole. Black holes are above the 3D matrix illusion and manifest themselves as voids of infinite magnetism as gravity is just magnetism. Magnetism ultimately is the power level to create reality, the stronger the magnetic power the higher levels of reality can be created. conscious interactions are decoded by the quantum brain differently at different quantum levels.
jeffman3003 2 months ago
What forces would have to be present to perpetuate the cause a black hole inside a once solid object? Would there not be an event horizon with polarity causing the moon to cave and devour itself? Both spiriling inward and out as it rips one end of the moon and spews debri out its backside?
devouredsoul 1 year ago
@devouredsoul I imagine not only would you see an indentation on the moon from the black hole, but a bubbling or round mountainous region from the reverse gravitational effect of a black hole. Push and pull?
devouredsoul 1 year ago
@devouredsoul
I have made no hypothesis concerning the origin of this black hole, or of what forces may perpetuate it. Nor did I postulate that the moon was a once solid object. It may be informative for you to watch the video again, and make careful note of what specific claims are made.
Your questions concerning the effects this black hole would have on observable phenomena at the surface of the moon are of more interest.
CerebralInterface 1 year ago
@devouredsoul If the crust of the hollow moon exists beyond the event horizon of the black hole, then it should appear to an outside observer indistinguishable from a solid moon with a mass equivalent to the blackn hole dispersed evenly throughout its interior (ignoring, of course, the effects this would have on the moment of inertia, which would not effect most properties of the moon or its interaction with the Earth and other celestial bodies anyway).
CerebralInterface 1 year ago