@quepacho64 Ever been in a T-34? I wouldnt call it a nice tank. It is mostly all manual control (including turret!), rough, designed for the crews to die before the tank, unrealiable, thinly armoured, undergunned. The guns were so weak, that they would actualy ram the enemy rather than shoot, because thats all the chance they had.
The only nice part about them is the sheer numbers made (around 100k I think). They outnumbered the enemy, and thats how they could win.
Those T34s needed to keep moving and flank the Tiger. They were sitting stationary, dangerous against a Tiger. The T34 and the Tiger are the grandfathers of all modern tanks, both armour and gun design
how did you get the audio? i got this game and the audio was much worse, is there a patch. update or anything that i can change the audio and battle sounds to the ones like these in the video?
@onsenfoudunomful I wanted to test the T-34.I knew it was not that bad against a Tiger.
My friend went to lunch,so I went in my T-34 and started shooting him.I used almost 30 projectiles,HE's,AP's and composite rigids,he was still alive without any problem.Then I went in front of him(who would've though he came back?) and he shot.Done,1 shot dead,30 projectiles: nothing.
@ThePribina ur a dumbass. never there was a tank able to penetrate the tiger's frontal armor from 500m. the T-34 could'nt hit jack shit at 500 meters anyway u dumbshit, its sights were shit, accuracy was crap and its gun a piece of true garbage, the F34 76,2mm peewee gun was an anti infantry gun with shitty penetration and AT ability, the T-34's relied on numbers when attacking tigers but that rarely worked, and to prove my words the F34 76mm had LESS penetration then the 57mm so shut the F up
@ThePribina yeah? bullshit. the 85mm was also another miserable failure of a gun. with shitty penetration and horrid accuracy, and before the germans got the tigers they had panzer 4s and panzer IIIs that pwned and killed your shitty KV which was one of the most primitive early period tanks in WW2, with a hand cranked turret and shit 76mm sewer pipe and the retarded hammer-steering method, its armor was shit, 75mm, not so hard to kill huh? btw the T34 had 45mm armor so STFU
ONE "primitive" KV in 1941 stopped near Dubno and keep ALL german panzer division 2 days !!! German panzer II and III had any chance penetrate his armor also from 3meters not ! Even not exist antitank gun which could destroy him.
KV had 75mm pipe but german tanks in the time 30 and max 40mm guns!
The T34 (1941) had 45mm armor bud german panzers had maximally 20mm!!!
It was hard surprise for nazi tank units,this is main reason why arose Tiger and later Panther the T34 copy!
@ThePribina yeah? bullshit. in the 1940's u may be right that panzer 3s and 2s cant kill a KV obviously thats not something to brag about as they were infantry tanks you DUMBASS. the panzer 4 wieled a 75mm gun with over 50mm armor and later increased to 80mm protection (more then your trashy KV had) and the PzIII was later armed with a 50mm gun and armored with 70mm protection making it one of the few light tanks in existence that had a chance to kill bigger tanks. u fail, one again
@crazysajko correction: 75-80mm armor and 76mm F-34, an inaccurate and weak sewer pipe, hammer cranked suspension, ultra slow, and old outdated 12-cylinder diesel model V-2.
loltank, even for inantry support this thing was way too big and overkill
@otester Correct. It was lost once Barbarossa failed to take Leningrad and Moscow before the first winter. Most of the army spent the Russian winter without winter clothing (thanks Goebbels) in tents and foxholes on the open steppe rather than garrisoned in Moscow. Stalin had ordered the whole city torched or blown up to deny it to the Germans, but whether he would have been totally successful seems doubtful, and the same act would deny its use to the Russian army.
@EntropicMisanthropic goebbels had nothing to do with armies equipment and stalin didnt ordered moscow to be purged...and wtf would he? russian had bases and command post there
thats not entirely true. i would say yes to the cold and deep mud, but not better armor. or overall design. the soviet tanks were built to last only a few engaments. the never expected them to last that long. and most didnt. they just build a shit ton. and had the crews to man them all.
Quality of things like optics was definitely higher on the German side. But quality of armor? Quality of overall design? Quality of resistance to the elements such as cold, deep mud, etc.? The Soviets had the German tanks beat.
In the early war (before 42 I think) there was no tank IN THE WORLD that could pierce the armor of T-34 from the front.
Later the Germans paid for their 'quality' that cost them valuable production time.- one Tiger tank took more than like a dozen t-34's to build..
thats not entirely true. i would say yes to the cold and deep mud, but not better armor. or overall design. the soviet tanks were built to last only a few engaments. the never expected them to last that long. and most didnt. they just build a shit ton. and had the crews to man them all.
thats not entirely true. i would say yes to the cold and deep mud, but not better armor. or overall design. the soviet tanks were built to last only a few engaments. the never expected them to last that long. and most didnt. they just build a shit ton. and had the crews to man them all.
@SchnellStell The population of the USSR in the late 1930's was only twice as big as the population of Germany. Not that big an advantage.
I say the Soviet tank design was better because they realized the reality of war better than the German engineers - a tank isn't going to last more than a few engagements! So why waste tons and tons of time and money making it all super technical, like the Germans did?
That would have worked if the Soviets gave em time to regroup and patch up their panzers
@drago884 right but people need to remember that the Tiger was not the main battle tank of the german army. the tiger was entirely worth its cost. people dont seem to understand it. it was a specialized tank. its purpose was to be the tip of the spear. look up the battle of prokhorovka. soviet losses were 250 to 300 t-34. the germans only lost 6- 10 tanks. that is a price totally worth paying. and any self respecting armoured force would rather take a tiger or panzer iv or panther anyday.
FALSE. According to wikipedia, 'ARed Army losses have been given from 200 to 822 tanks but the loss records show about 300 complete losses... about 60 to 70 German tanks are thought to have been total losses.'
If by 'any self respecting armoured force' you meant 'any armoured force destined for ultimate defeat due to overextension and lack of resources because of their overly-complicated fighting equipment' then yes, I would agree.
thats not entirely true. i would say yes to the cold and deep mud, but not better armor. or overall design. the soviet tanks were built to last only a few engaments. the never expected them to last that long. and most didnt. they just build a shit ton. and had the crews to man them all.
@arnoldnoki am not sure what you mean but the Panther (Panzer V) was german the T-34 was soviet though random fact:it was a German company who made the T-34s armour
@jasincl ahahahahaha, and here too!! and did u know that soviet didnt export or inport anything!?!? so no tank designer could have bought armour from germany at that time!! and most of the tanks were produced during the war, so why would germany sell armor to an enemy then, even if they could?? ^^
@jasincl related random fact: The Panther was designed to be a superior copy of the T-34 - at the time of the war's beginning, the T-34 was the strongest tank in the world. Most German tanks couldn't pierce it's armor with their cannons from the front - but Germans of course had better tactics (at the beginning of the war).
The Panther was a more powerful tank, but for the cost of 1 Panther you could build like 5 T-34's, so the Soviet strategy still came out on top.
Tiger hade Better armour and the BEST cannon of the war but it was Slow and Broke down easliy and the T34 was faster hade GREAT armour too! (witch was actually made by the Germans witch they Only used in 1943) but the T34 engine didnt Break Down so many Times so they Considered it better
@iJaydan course it hade! It hade the 88mm the 88 wasnt the biggest but the best it was the Most Accurate Easy to reload long range and Awsome Firepwer but the BIGGEST Cannons were French 155mm i think :/ (biggest Land Cannons)
Im guessing you dont know alot about guns then. 88 just refer's to the shell not the version, Example the Panther used a KwK 42 L/70 which was smaller than the Tigers yet it had more penetration and quicker reloading times so if youre judging it on that and the accuracy it the Panther would have already won.
"It had the 88mm" Which is the shell of the size. Im not sure where you thought he was talking about the version from.
It may not have been the biggest (it was still a bloody big gun) or penetration. It was still considered to most, the best cannon of the war. And i have to agree with those people.
Then it is useless, The shell is unimportant without the cannon and even then the Panther was statisticly better it had a smaller shell (quicker reloading) more propelant charge (more penetration) a longer barrel (again more penetration/more accuracy) oh and...When talking about tanks you dont talk about the shell but what fires it, You just need to look at tank forums like TankNutDave. So what part of the Tigers GUN is better?
@iJaydan Dude, its not about what they made after their first encounters with the tiger. It is fact thath they were pretty shocked facing a monster with this kind of armor and 88mm high velocity shooting ability after their usual panzer II - IV encounters. an unimproved sherman ate shit against those.
@ParaglidingManiac - Hi...thanks...I found a serial number that works. I appreciate your offer very much. I kind of like the game. Have there been updates for it? Seems like there are some glitches, but generally a good time. Is it me or do the Tigers bog down big time when you go off the roads with it? I seem to get stuck when I cut across a field or go into the woods.
@ParaglidingManiac It's probably me...I have a knack for getting glitches. But...when you say "game's name" patch 1.02, do you mean to google "T34 vs Tiger Patch 1.02" Or exactly as you show?
Ich empfehle euch das Buch "Russische "Untermenschen" in Berlin, oder Wer besiegte das Dritte Reich ?" Man kann es im Internet finden. Dort wird klar gezeigt wer den Krieg gewonnen hat.
hahaha this is what it actually looks like from the gunner's view..only one thing,for the tank in ww2 to fire it had to stop moving.you could not drive and shoot.this development only came later
@gyshalom Some gunners were capable to do (not on a very rough terrain nor at high speeds, off course) so with some accuracy. But yes, the usual tactic was "move, identify target, stop, fire, move again".
@gyshalom Yes, i know, It began with gyroscopes to help stabilize the cannon at the end of the war, i think the Americans were the first to use it, not sure about that tough.
@nurmiar the soviets had 20 million soldiers before wwII, they lost 13 million after the war, not to mention the civilian but every battle the russians won, the cost was by the amount of casualties,
@fadyb56 I like both Russia and Germany, so I dont say anything about the nazi ideology...I have always thought that Russia and Germany should cooperate
@nurmiar yes,ur comment has a specific goal. u r right, some historians say that Nazi germany and Soviet russia has a very similar ideologies,they differed in tactics.karl haushofer (man behind hitler) had a plan to unite germnay, soviet russia and japan. there is alot of truth to what u r saying. i my self is a socialist (am not a liberalist , nor democratic, nor capitalist basically nothing with an illusion) i am more toward extermism for the best of the nation and not selfish individuals
@fadyb56 Sounds interesting..Japan ,Germany , Russia together would have been unbeatable...I think I am a socialist to...sometimes I am not sure.
I am also towards the best of the nation.Now a days individualism has gone to far..everything is about money and profit..but only a few enjoys the money and the profit...
@nurmiar great to hear someone is understanding wt am saying.ofcourse u dont have to stick with whats out there u can always form ur ideas and principles.
"the days of individual happiness have passed"-Adolf Hitler. the world is going down and with this non-sense we r all doomed if we dont stand up for strong capable nations that r actually united. if the us govt falls, ppl will eat each other because they have nothing in commen they r individuals, unlike nazi germmans, they fought to the end.
@mihanich -- According to Sergey Aleksandrovich Il’enkov – Graduate from the Kalinnin Suvorov Military Academy, the Higher Military Academy, the Moscow State Historical-Archival Institute. Assistant chief for scientific work of the Central Archives of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Author of many scientific works on the history of the Great Patriotic War, the Red Army lost 12, 434, 398 privates and sergeants and 1,100,000 officers in WWII. So how am I wrong?
you said that "russian tactics are always the same: overwhelming pressing by numbers" and etc. so if you wanna be right correct your comment that its related to ww2 when stalin destroyed russian military school, not the entire russian military history. do you know who was suvorov?
@mihanich -- Okay, I think I see what you mean now. I was ONLY referring to WWII, and I was saying that during that period Russian infantry tactics were the same as their armor tactics-- overwhelm the germans with numbers regardless of the cost in lives. Stalin IS to blame for this. I'm reading about Suvurov now. Amazing commander in the 1700s. Unlike Stalin, he let his commanders make their own decisions in battle. I wonder what would have happened if he lived long enough to fight Napoleon!
@mihanich -- "Both Zhukov and Koniev now were charging full speed at Berlin, but at a very high cost. Unimaginable amounts of casualties were inflicted upon the Russian attackers, but their generals only had one thing in mind: to be the first to reach Berlin." -- The Battle of Berlin, C. Peter Chen
And finally, the bottom line is that only around 1500 tiger 1s were ever produced. That's absurd when you think about the efforts of all the allies put into stopping this low production tank then you pretty much sound like a moron when you say it had no impact, this tank or that tank was better, blah blah blah. There were 60,000 and 55,0000 T34s and Sherman made respectively. 1500 Tigers. That alone pretty much puts any argument you have to bed. Thanks.
@mayamanign 1500 tigers produced shows just how small Germanys industrial capacity was compared to Russia and the USA..only a fool begins war with Russia and the USA at the same time..and as you know, the result was a catastroph for Germany
If you had maybe made the argument that super light tank destroyers like the firefly made a difference I'd have taken you more serious. The firefly while being completely under armored was so fast and made in sufficient numbers to be devastating to the tiger. One firefly killed three tiger in around ten minutes using it's superior speed and formidable gun.
The Tiger is a tank of conquest, it was mainly as a tank of retreat with limited air support against VASTLY superior numbers, with full air support. With full Luftwaffe air support, the tigers would have decimated the Shermans. Ground attack aircraft played an enormous part. Also your scenario is post Normandy, again where the tigers were used in defensive postures. Big difference and you should know better. It's simple history. Learn it.
@mayamanign Its also simple history that is not so smart to construct tanks like theTiger , if you dont have the same metal and oil resources as your enemy.If you want to win a war, then it is smarter to build tanks like T34, Sherman....and if you know simple history, then you know its true...
@nurmiar Germany didnt have the "human capital" to man 10ks of weak and simple tanks. They should have focussed on designs which should have been easier to mass-produce, but to put crews into tanks such as T34, the well trained crews were too valuable and needed a tank which could promote their skills and offer more survivability.
@Fr4nkWh1te You could learn to drive the T34 in half an hour....The T34 was not weak (sloped armour for instance)...Until 1943(Panther with sloped armour) Germany had no tank that could match the T34 or KV1.(yes I know that the Tiger was tested in nov. 1942)
You maybe know that the german panzer general Guderian wanted to copy the T34 as it was...a german general in the southern front said(1941) : "if the russians can massproduce this tank(T34), then we have lost the war"
Here is a well documented instance of a single Tiger " On 7 July 1943, a single Tiger tank commanded by SS-Oberscharführer Franz Staudegger from the 2nd Platoon, 13th Panzer Company, 1st SS Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler engaged a group of about 50 T-34s around Psyolknee (the southern sector of the German salient in the Battle of Kursk). Staudegger used all his ammunition and claimed the destruction of 22 Soviet tanks ". The accurate number for total war time kill ratio is more like 5:1
@mayamanign there was a tank that easily could kill the Tiger and any german tank(including Tiger 2 and Jagdtiger).It was the JSU 152..with its huge 15,2 cm gun it killed many Elephants and Tigers at the battle of Kursk..battallions of JSU 152:s where very feared by the german heavy tank formations
Lol what? I'm comparing the two tanks in this game. I don't think the title of the game is "apples and oranges, tanks that would never meet". So yeah get a clue. Also, there are documented instances from Kursk that the Tigers kill ratio was pretty ridiculous, some of them 11 to 1. And that's against what people consider the best tank of the war. Against the lightly armored Sherman it would've been and was a slaughter. You're scenario also leans toward post Normandy conflict, where untrai
Whoa, I don't want you to think I supported the spread of fascism or the subjugation and torture of millions. All I'm stating is the German army from a military standpoint, not a political or ideological standpoint. I give credit where it's due on military standpoint only. Like I said, if the Germans would have waited two years, had been more decentralized and not so dependent on hitlers orders, history would have been very different. Thank God it isn't.
Another thing, you think the Germans would have stood pat in their designs? Again, if they would have not attacked Russia until 1944 or 1945, they not only would have total control of all of Europe and no second front. But also designs of advanced jet fighters, advanced tanks, and the facilities to build both in great numbers. It would have been even more terrible for the Russians. Thank history that the Nazis made the decisions they did.
Listen, I'm no German apologist. I go by the facts at hand. Given equal numbers in men, resources, and production capabilities, the Germans would have overtaken the soviets, period, end of story. I hate that people let their common sense be clouded by hate for the Nazi scumbags. We're not judging, just comparing militaries.
@mayamanign i totally get you, I believe that the German Army was the best trained and best equipped army at the time. People feel they cannot say that just because of the holocaust. Besides most German soldiers were just ordinary people who didn't play a hand in it. Looking back I think most of us would say that we would have supported the nazis knowing what the german people knew then as they were a party dedicated to improving german place in the world. Hindsight is why we don't applaud
@14th20thKRHkickass Oddly enough this exactly the mindset of some people in Europe and America in the '30s. You could say this is the root of Chamberlains "appeasement". After all whats a little genocide, euthanasia, civilian butchery and Ghengis Khan like empire building compared to a pathological aversion to Communism. Small minds in the '30s and '40s thought exactly like you.
"great triumph?" take a look @ the losses the russian army had during WW2 and you'll see that there was a triumph over the nazis but the only thing "great" about it was the losses on both sides.
All German tanks were a lot nicer, but the fact is that on battlefield T-34 was superior to Tiger. Tiger was just too unwieldy, while T-34 had light sloping armor, better suspension and more sophisticated aiming.
@Retsiprooksus You can't possibly be serious? A T-34 isn't even in the same league as Tiger. One is a medium tank and the other is a heavy tank. If you want to go out joy riding or heavy recon, then a T-34 might be your ticket. But in terms of actually going toe to toe with an enemy, killing power, and protection the Tiger is like 1,000 times better (literally).
I stand by my previous statement, the Tiger cannot pierce the armor of an IS-2 in all practicality, and the Panther would be hard pressed to pull off a kill.
I can't find any accuracy info for the Panther, but I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say it would be better due to higher muzzle velocity and a longer barrel. But I wouldn't expect anything more than a 20 percent improvement to base accuracy, and more likely around 10 percent realistically.
Lol the is2? Ummm the main battles were fiought with the t34. The is2 had minimal if any impact. Bottom line sheer numbers overwhelmed the Germans, this has been proven over again by historians, especially at the battle of Kursk where the Germans delta the Russians horrible losses despite being outnumbered at times 5 to 1. It's pretty common knowledge that the Germans lacked the numbers of men and equipment to ever win the war. If it were a even fight the Germans would have mopped the sovi
Oh and the JSIII didn't even see service in WWII dude. It was not ready for action. If we're on the subject of tanks that didn't make it into the war I'm sure the Germans would have had something to counter it. The Tiger and subsequent King Tiger were both outdated designs and still ran amok on the battlefield. At kursk the Germans were ridiculously outnumbered and still gave the soviets 5 days of pure hell. With more equipment its pretty obvious the Germans would have mopped the soviets.
The Tiget Tank was the strongest of all tank during WWII. They crushed both American, and Soviet Union tanks. The problem was if the US, or Russia lost 100 tanks they could easily built 100 more, but if Nazi Germany lost 5 tiger tanks, that was a great problem for them. Also, the Tiger Tanks were heavy, and could easily be outmaneuver, but they make up that for the superior range.
I am suprized the Germans , in the early part of the Russian campaign, were able to make a good fight against the t-34, using the undergunned mk III tanks, and short barrel mk IV. just shows how good the German tank men were at getting the most out of their machines.
Don't be so dogmatic. There were many instances where a T-34 defeated a Tiger II. Partially due to lower quality materials used by the Germans towards the end of the war, but the T-34 was pretty a good tank indeed.
It also scored kills against the more advanced M47 in Cyprus.
@CheliozChev For all their so called technological superiority the Germans failed to understand a good design in large numbers was more important then the ridiculous but limited numbers of tigers they produced.They nearly got it right with the panther but would have done better to just copy the T34 & build as many as possible. It terrified the panzer crews who first had to faced it. In total numbers the British (smallest of the 3main allies) built more tanks as well as purchasing17k US tanks.
@CheliozChev sorry t34s were much superior. actually one of the main reasons that turned the tide of the war was t34. it has been admitted by the military weapons specialists of present as well as past. even the third reich admitted the design superiority of the t34.
Russians threw numbers at the Germans. Only the leader's tank had a radio in the Russian platoon. The Germans always tried to get him first, then the rest would not be able to organize their efforts. It was that way until the end of WW2. The Russians lost countless tank crews due to this.
Точно
JX1955 2 weeks ago
амерекосы иди-де нахуй отсюда!!
MKOpride 2 weeks ago
lol, both tanks were nice, but tiger was simply slightly better
quepacho64 2 months ago
@quepacho64 Ever been in a T-34? I wouldnt call it a nice tank. It is mostly all manual control (including turret!), rough, designed for the crews to die before the tank, unrealiable, thinly armoured, undergunned. The guns were so weak, that they would actualy ram the enemy rather than shoot, because thats all the chance they had.
The only nice part about them is the sheer numbers made (around 100k I think). They outnumbered the enemy, and thats how they could win.
Sabertoothpython 1 month ago
Those T34s needed to keep moving and flank the Tiger. They were sitting stationary, dangerous against a Tiger. The T34 and the Tiger are the grandfathers of all modern tanks, both armour and gun design
dblancer 3 months ago
this is pure bull. The tiger would have cleaned house. BIAS AMERIKANER!
ChristophRommel 3 months ago
how did you get the audio? i got this game and the audio was much worse, is there a patch. update or anything that i can change the audio and battle sounds to the ones like these in the video?
dividednation44 3 months ago
damn i love the audio
dividednation44 3 months ago
Just need IS-2 vs. Tiger 2 lol.
otester 4 months ago
what is the game?
look a like Red orchestra.
but it is not.
BizzLeVrai 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BizzLeVrai WWII Battle Tanks: T-34 vs. Tiger <<name of the game
woldanchampion 5 months ago
Engine noise ear rape
IcyFreshHALO 5 months ago
My money is on the Tiger.
onsenfoudunomful 5 months ago
@onsenfoudunomful I wanted to test the T-34.I knew it was not that bad against a Tiger.
My friend went to lunch,so I went in my T-34 and started shooting him.I used almost 30 projectiles,HE's,AP's and composite rigids,he was still alive without any problem.Then I went in front of him(who would've though he came back?) and he shot.Done,1 shot dead,30 projectiles: nothing.
So you need 20 T-34's to rape a tiger :D
idvhfd 5 months ago
@idvhfd In the video are the T/34 300m away from Tiger. But the T34 destroyed the heavy Tiger from 500m without problem . Its only game :-)
ThePribina 3 months ago
@ThePribina
You're talking about the T-34/85, ones in the video are T-34/76's.
otester 3 months ago
@ThePribina ur a dumbass. never there was a tank able to penetrate the tiger's frontal armor from 500m. the T-34 could'nt hit jack shit at 500 meters anyway u dumbshit, its sights were shit, accuracy was crap and its gun a piece of true garbage, the F34 76,2mm peewee gun was an anti infantry gun with shitty penetration and AT ability, the T-34's relied on numbers when attacking tigers but that rarely worked, and to prove my words the F34 76mm had LESS penetration then the 57mm so shut the F up
dividednation44 2 months ago
@dividednation44 hey germanofil, the germans before Tiger had no tank that can compete the KV and T34 !
The next generation T34 with 85mm gun (with wolfram antiarmour cannon charge) really penetrated from 500m the Tiger frontal armor !
ThePribina 2 months ago
@ThePribina yeah? bullshit. the 85mm was also another miserable failure of a gun. with shitty penetration and horrid accuracy, and before the germans got the tigers they had panzer 4s and panzer IIIs that pwned and killed your shitty KV which was one of the most primitive early period tanks in WW2, with a hand cranked turret and shit 76mm sewer pipe and the retarded hammer-steering method, its armor was shit, 75mm, not so hard to kill huh? btw the T34 had 45mm armor so STFU
dividednation44 2 months ago
@dividednation44
ONE "primitive" KV in 1941 stopped near Dubno and keep ALL german panzer division 2 days !!! German panzer II and III had any chance penetrate his armor also from 3meters not ! Even not exist antitank gun which could destroy him.
KV had 75mm pipe but german tanks in the time 30 and max 40mm guns!
The T34 (1941) had 45mm armor bud german panzers had maximally 20mm!!!
It was hard surprise for nazi tank units,this is main reason why arose Tiger and later Panther the T34 copy!
ThePribina 2 months ago
@ThePribina yeah? bullshit. in the 1940's u may be right that panzer 3s and 2s cant kill a KV obviously thats not something to brag about as they were infantry tanks you DUMBASS. the panzer 4 wieled a 75mm gun with over 50mm armor and later increased to 80mm protection (more then your trashy KV had) and the PzIII was later armed with a 50mm gun and armored with 70mm protection making it one of the few light tanks in existence that had a chance to kill bigger tanks. u fail, one again
dividednation44 2 months ago
@dividednation44 you have truth "LATER" !!!
ThePribina 2 months ago
@dividednation44 ur wrong. KV had 90mm armor and 76.2mm cannon
source: WIKIPEDIA
crazysajko 1 month ago
@crazysajko correction: 75-80mm armor and 76mm F-34, an inaccurate and weak sewer pipe, hammer cranked suspension, ultra slow, and old outdated 12-cylinder diesel model V-2.
loltank, even for inantry support this thing was way too big and overkill
dividednation44 1 month ago
@crazysajko KV: 76mm |(low velocity). KV-2: 152mm (low velocity), or 107mm (high velocity)
Sabertoothpython 1 month ago
Very realistic vehicular simulator, but where are the other arms & obstacles?
centurion180ad 5 months ago
fucking LOVE the sound of the gun shooting. pirate bay here i come.
LordBlackice445 6 months ago 2
Comment removed
westy2233 6 months ago
what are the name of thuis game
lukmessel 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
is this game free
armymen12002003 6 months ago
I love it when he says jagdpanzer and talks when you mark the enemy tanks!
radioactivetwinky 6 months ago
whan game is it ?
BlackHowk123 6 months ago
nice profiles against the clear sky and standing still, stupid T34, or is it the video that is crap ;)
MajSolo 7 months ago
omg sound only on left speaker, video sucks
desetnik15second 7 months ago
no multicore support sucks. old ass engine runs poorly on new machine.
the graphics are nice though. but damn, i wish i could play the hezter or su 152. some more interesting and rarely mentioned vehicles.
zackhanscom 7 months ago
NICE SOUND xDD
tarzipan2008 7 months ago
That doesnt look that the real German tank sight.
JRBL1A1 7 months ago
@JRBL1A1 I'm no expert on this game, but I think the player (in this instance) is playing as TC and not gunner.
0pteryx 6 months ago
I wish I could find this game :(
radioactivetwinky 8 months ago
"Eins uhr....feindliche jagdpanzer, ein tausend...Panzergranate neun und dreißig!....SCHUSS!!!.....Ziel verpass.....BOOM!
NCruizer 8 months ago
the serial of the game is as follows serial: F4ZX7-8LV12-2TJK5-1K6N1-4YVX8
MegaBayleaff 8 months ago
a serial-key??
Stykness 8 months ago
where we can buy this game??
darthokty 8 months ago
The war was lost before the Tiger showed up.
otester 8 months ago
@otester Correct. It was lost once Barbarossa failed to take Leningrad and Moscow before the first winter. Most of the army spent the Russian winter without winter clothing (thanks Goebbels) in tents and foxholes on the open steppe rather than garrisoned in Moscow. Stalin had ordered the whole city torched or blown up to deny it to the Germans, but whether he would have been totally successful seems doubtful, and the same act would deny its use to the Russian army.
EntropicMisanthropic 7 months ago
@EntropicMisanthropic goebbels had nothing to do with armies equipment and stalin didnt ordered moscow to be purged...and wtf would he? russian had bases and command post there
KingTiger312 6 months ago
@EntropicMisanthropic *Soviet Army-not Russian
SIPLcy 5 months ago
are there mods for shurmen and other alied tanks?
spam1138 9 months ago
idiot....time to reduce the sound!!!!
Tw11st 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thats not entirely true. i would say yes to the cold and deep mud, but not better armor. or overall design. the soviet tanks were built to last only a few engaments. the never expected them to last that long. and most didnt. they just build a shit ton. and had the crews to man them all.
SchnellStell 10 months ago
you popped its effing top off nice work
alexshoot 10 months ago
Quality of things like optics was definitely higher on the German side. But quality of armor? Quality of overall design? Quality of resistance to the elements such as cold, deep mud, etc.? The Soviets had the German tanks beat.
In the early war (before 42 I think) there was no tank IN THE WORLD that could pierce the armor of T-34 from the front.
Later the Germans paid for their 'quality' that cost them valuable production time.- one Tiger tank took more than like a dozen t-34's to build..
drago884 10 months ago
@drago884
thats not entirely true. i would say yes to the cold and deep mud, but not better armor. or overall design. the soviet tanks were built to last only a few engaments. the never expected them to last that long. and most didnt. they just build a shit ton. and had the crews to man them all.
SchnellStell 10 months ago
@drago884
thats not entirely true. i would say yes to the cold and deep mud, but not better armor. or overall design. the soviet tanks were built to last only a few engaments. the never expected them to last that long. and most didnt. they just build a shit ton. and had the crews to man them all.
SchnellStell 10 months ago
@SchnellStell The population of the USSR in the late 1930's was only twice as big as the population of Germany. Not that big an advantage.
I say the Soviet tank design was better because they realized the reality of war better than the German engineers - a tank isn't going to last more than a few engagements! So why waste tons and tons of time and money making it all super technical, like the Germans did?
That would have worked if the Soviets gave em time to regroup and patch up their panzers
drago884 10 months ago
@drago884 right but people need to remember that the Tiger was not the main battle tank of the german army. the tiger was entirely worth its cost. people dont seem to understand it. it was a specialized tank. its purpose was to be the tip of the spear. look up the battle of prokhorovka. soviet losses were 250 to 300 t-34. the germans only lost 6- 10 tanks. that is a price totally worth paying. and any self respecting armoured force would rather take a tiger or panzer iv or panther anyday.
SchnellStell 9 months ago
@SchnellStell
FALSE. According to wikipedia, 'ARed Army losses have been given from 200 to 822 tanks but the loss records show about 300 complete losses... about 60 to 70 German tanks are thought to have been total losses.'
If by 'any self respecting armoured force' you meant 'any armoured force destined for ultimate defeat due to overextension and lack of resources because of their overly-complicated fighting equipment' then yes, I would agree.
The tip of the German spear wasn't sharp enuf
drago884 9 months ago
@drago884
Soviet propaganda,read some Nieppe and Glanz stuff about the battle and you'll see.
Raubritter1488 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@drago884
thats not entirely true. i would say yes to the cold and deep mud, but not better armor. or overall design. the soviet tanks were built to last only a few engaments. the never expected them to last that long. and most didnt. they just build a shit ton. and had the crews to man them all.
SchnellStell 10 months ago
You in the tiger right??
Basjje555 11 months ago
my grandpa worked on one of the Tiger tanks in WWII
but he wasnt in russia
waddlerobloxxxx 1 year ago
war die flugbahn bei den panzern so ballistisch? so wie das bei 1:35 zu sehen ist.
0099ffgg 1 year ago
what was the best tank made in the ww2?
arnoldnoki 1 year ago
@arnoldnoki they say it was the T-34 or the Panzer V Ausf.G (A.k.a "Panther)
jasincl 1 year ago
@jasincl so it's from germany?
arnoldnoki 1 year ago
@arnoldnoki am not sure what you mean but the Panther (Panzer V) was german the T-34 was soviet though random fact:it was a German company who made the T-34s armour
jasincl 1 year ago
@jasincl ahahahahaha, and here too!! and did u know that soviet didnt export or inport anything!?!? so no tank designer could have bought armour from germany at that time!! and most of the tanks were produced during the war, so why would germany sell armor to an enemy then, even if they could?? ^^
philllllllle 1 year ago
@jasincl related random fact: The Panther was designed to be a superior copy of the T-34 - at the time of the war's beginning, the T-34 was the strongest tank in the world. Most German tanks couldn't pierce it's armor with their cannons from the front - but Germans of course had better tactics (at the beginning of the war).
The Panther was a more powerful tank, but for the cost of 1 Panther you could build like 5 T-34's, so the Soviet strategy still came out on top.
drago884 11 months ago
@drago884 yea but T-34 quality could never compare to german quality
Darklordkime 10 months ago
also the panthers armour was better eventhough it was a bit thinner because it was slopped. Also they were faster.
PJ3love 1 year ago
the game is shit
lordAable 1 year ago
Tiger hade Better armour and the BEST cannon of the war but it was Slow and Broke down easliy and the T34 was faster hade GREAT armour too! (witch was actually made by the Germans witch they Only used in 1943) but the T34 engine didnt Break Down so many Times so they Considered it better
jasincl 1 year ago
@jasincl
The Tiger didnt have the best cannon of the war.
iJaydan 1 year ago
@iJaydan course it hade! It hade the 88mm the 88 wasnt the biggest but the best it was the Most Accurate Easy to reload long range and Awsome Firepwer but the BIGGEST Cannons were French 155mm i think :/ (biggest Land Cannons)
jasincl 1 year ago
@jasincl
Where are you getting these facts from?
iJaydan 1 year ago
@iJaydan maybe from every single WW2 Book i read -.- and Tank Books and Films and Tank Museams...... the 88mm was the best cannon of the war
jasincl 1 year ago
@jasincl
Im guessing you dont know alot about guns then. 88 just refer's to the shell not the version, Example the Panther used a KwK 42 L/70 which was smaller than the Tigers yet it had more penetration and quicker reloading times so if youre judging it on that and the accuracy it the Panther would have already won.
iJaydan 1 year ago
@iJaydan
jasincl even said it refers to the shell.
"It had the 88mm" Which is the shell of the size. Im not sure where you thought he was talking about the version from.
It may not have been the biggest (it was still a bloody big gun) or penetration. It was still considered to most, the best cannon of the war. And i have to agree with those people.
FightingFalc0n 1 year ago
@FightingFalc0n
Then it is useless, The shell is unimportant without the cannon and even then the Panther was statisticly better it had a smaller shell (quicker reloading) more propelant charge (more penetration) a longer barrel (again more penetration/more accuracy) oh and...When talking about tanks you dont talk about the shell but what fires it, You just need to look at tank forums like TankNutDave. So what part of the Tigers GUN is better?
iJaydan 1 year ago
@iJaydan Dude, its not about what they made after their first encounters with the tiger. It is fact thath they were pretty shocked facing a monster with this kind of armor and 88mm high velocity shooting ability after their usual panzer II - IV encounters. an unimproved sherman ate shit against those.
OsamaBinKathr 1 year ago
@OsamaBinKathr
If you dont know what we're talking about to join in his first comment said "Best cannon of the war" not Great Armor.
iJaydan 1 year ago
@jasincl BIGGEST gun during WW2 was Schwerer Gustav. 1,350 tonnes, 47.3 metres and 800 millimetres but it was absolutely to big to any tank. :)
Menties1 2 months ago
T-34 vs Tiger :)
Warmaker01 1 year ago
the name is WWII Battle Tanks: T-34 vs. Tiger
kungu111 1 year ago
whats the name of the game ??
BramsCommando 1 year ago
Comment removed
Stukadriver 1 year ago
Comment removed
Stukadriver 1 year ago
@Stukadriver,
I can give you my serial number to use. Do you still need it?
ParaglidingManiac 1 year ago
@ParaglidingManiac - Hi...thanks...I found a serial number that works. I appreciate your offer very much. I kind of like the game. Have there been updates for it? Seems like there are some glitches, but generally a good time. Is it me or do the Tigers bog down big time when you go off the roads with it? I seem to get stuck when I cut across a field or go into the woods.
Stukadriver 1 year ago
@Stukadriver,
Hi, sorry I didn't notice these glitches or bugs in the game. Yes, there's a patch for the game. Ingoogle, type in: "game's name" patch 1.02.
ParaglidingManiac 1 year ago
@ParaglidingManiac It's probably me...I have a knack for getting glitches. But...when you say "game's name" patch 1.02, do you mean to google "T34 vs Tiger Patch 1.02" Or exactly as you show?
Thanks again.
Stukadriver 1 year ago
@Stukadriver,
WWII Battle Tanks: T-34 vs Tiger 1.02 :) you can add some words to the end, such as download. Might help you fidn a link to download the patch.
ParaglidingManiac 1 year ago
@ParaglidingManiac Excellent. Thanks very much for your help.
Horrido!
Stukadriver 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ich empfehle euch das Buch "Russische "Untermenschen" in Berlin, oder Wer besiegte das Dritte Reich ?" Man kann es im Internet finden. Dort wird klar gezeigt wer den Krieg gewonnen hat.
Lichtenwald1989 1 year ago
but it is a game?
MrItaly92ful 1 year ago
hahaha this is what it actually looks like from the gunner's view..only one thing,for the tank in ww2 to fire it had to stop moving.you could not drive and shoot.this development only came later
gyshalom 1 year ago
@gyshalom Some gunners were capable to do (not on a very rough terrain nor at high speeds, off course) so with some accuracy. But yes, the usual tactic was "move, identify target, stop, fire, move again".
bfahren 1 year ago
@bfahren modern tanks have a stablising mechanism.you can shoot on the move...short distances though..up to 600 meters
gyshalom 1 year ago
@gyshalom Yes, i know, It began with gyroscopes to help stabilize the cannon at the end of the war, i think the Americans were the first to use it, not sure about that tough.
bfahren 1 year ago
what game is this???
drk4tlf 1 year ago
the soviets had 80 % of the casualties ibn the whole war ! over 20 million soviets died!
killerrj8 1 year ago
@killerrj8 including 13 million innocent civilians
nurmiar 1 year ago
@nurmiar the soviets had 20 million soldiers before wwII, they lost 13 million after the war, not to mention the civilian but every battle the russians won, the cost was by the amount of casualties,
fadyb56 1 year ago
@fadyb56 Germany to lost millions of soldiers at the eastern front, the difference is that the germans could not replace the losses...
nurmiar 1 year ago
@nurmiar yes, i agree. but proportionally comparing 2mill germans to 13 mill soldiers is something to consider.
fadyb56 1 year ago
@fadyb56 Yes, altough it was a high prize for the russians..they won
nurmiar 1 year ago
@nurmiar they did. but their triumph takes nothing from the highly valued principles of the Nazi ideology.
fadyb56 1 year ago
@fadyb56 I like both Russia and Germany, so I dont say anything about the nazi ideology...I have always thought that Russia and Germany should cooperate
nurmiar 1 year ago
@nurmiar yes,ur comment has a specific goal. u r right, some historians say that Nazi germany and Soviet russia has a very similar ideologies,they differed in tactics.karl haushofer (man behind hitler) had a plan to unite germnay, soviet russia and japan. there is alot of truth to what u r saying. i my self is a socialist (am not a liberalist , nor democratic, nor capitalist basically nothing with an illusion) i am more toward extermism for the best of the nation and not selfish individuals
fadyb56 1 year ago
@fadyb56 Sounds interesting..Japan ,Germany , Russia together would have been unbeatable...I think I am a socialist to...sometimes I am not sure.
I am also towards the best of the nation.Now a days individualism has gone to far..everything is about money and profit..but only a few enjoys the money and the profit...
nurmiar 1 year ago
@nurmiar great to hear someone is understanding wt am saying.ofcourse u dont have to stick with whats out there u can always form ur ideas and principles.
"the days of individual happiness have passed"-Adolf Hitler. the world is going down and with this non-sense we r all doomed if we dont stand up for strong capable nations that r actually united. if the us govt falls, ppl will eat each other because they have nothing in commen they r individuals, unlike nazi germmans, they fought to the end.
fadyb56 1 year ago
@timaloha
youre wrong
mihanich 1 year ago
@mihanich -- According to Sergey Aleksandrovich Il’enkov – Graduate from the Kalinnin Suvorov Military Academy, the Higher Military Academy, the Moscow State Historical-Archival Institute. Assistant chief for scientific work of the Central Archives of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Author of many scientific works on the history of the Great Patriotic War, the Red Army lost 12, 434, 398 privates and sergeants and 1,100,000 officers in WWII. So how am I wrong?
timaloha 1 year ago
@timaloha
you said that "russian tactics are always the same: overwhelming pressing by numbers" and etc. so if you wanna be right correct your comment that its related to ww2 when stalin destroyed russian military school, not the entire russian military history. do you know who was suvorov?
mihanich 1 year ago
@mihanich -- Okay, I think I see what you mean now. I was ONLY referring to WWII, and I was saying that during that period Russian infantry tactics were the same as their armor tactics-- overwhelm the germans with numbers regardless of the cost in lives. Stalin IS to blame for this. I'm reading about Suvurov now. Amazing commander in the 1700s. Unlike Stalin, he let his commanders make their own decisions in battle. I wonder what would have happened if he lived long enough to fight Napoleon!
timaloha 1 year ago
@mihanich -- "Both Zhukov and Koniev now were charging full speed at Berlin, but at a very high cost. Unimaginable amounts of casualties were inflicted upon the Russian attackers, but their generals only had one thing in mind: to be the first to reach Berlin." -- The Battle of Berlin, C. Peter Chen
timaloha 1 year ago
And finally, the bottom line is that only around 1500 tiger 1s were ever produced. That's absurd when you think about the efforts of all the allies put into stopping this low production tank then you pretty much sound like a moron when you say it had no impact, this tank or that tank was better, blah blah blah. There were 60,000 and 55,0000 T34s and Sherman made respectively. 1500 Tigers. That alone pretty much puts any argument you have to bed. Thanks.
mayamanign 1 year ago
@mayamanign 1500 tigers produced shows just how small Germanys industrial capacity was compared to Russia and the USA..only a fool begins war with Russia and the USA at the same time..and as you know, the result was a catastroph for Germany
nurmiar 1 year ago
If you had maybe made the argument that super light tank destroyers like the firefly made a difference I'd have taken you more serious. The firefly while being completely under armored was so fast and made in sufficient numbers to be devastating to the tiger. One firefly killed three tiger in around ten minutes using it's superior speed and formidable gun.
mayamanign 1 year ago
The Tiger is a tank of conquest, it was mainly as a tank of retreat with limited air support against VASTLY superior numbers, with full air support. With full Luftwaffe air support, the tigers would have decimated the Shermans. Ground attack aircraft played an enormous part. Also your scenario is post Normandy, again where the tigers were used in defensive postures. Big difference and you should know better. It's simple history. Learn it.
mayamanign 1 year ago
@mayamanign Its also simple history that is not so smart to construct tanks like theTiger , if you dont have the same metal and oil resources as your enemy.If you want to win a war, then it is smarter to build tanks like T34, Sherman....and if you know simple history, then you know its true...
nurmiar 1 year ago
@nurmiar Germany didnt have the "human capital" to man 10ks of weak and simple tanks. They should have focussed on designs which should have been easier to mass-produce, but to put crews into tanks such as T34, the well trained crews were too valuable and needed a tank which could promote their skills and offer more survivability.
Fr4nkWh1te 1 year ago
@Fr4nkWh1te You could learn to drive the T34 in half an hour....The T34 was not weak (sloped armour for instance)...Until 1943(Panther with sloped armour) Germany had no tank that could match the T34 or KV1.(yes I know that the Tiger was tested in nov. 1942)
You maybe know that the german panzer general Guderian wanted to copy the T34 as it was...a german general in the southern front said(1941) : "if the russians can massproduce this tank(T34), then we have lost the war"
nurmiar 1 year ago
Here is a well documented instance of a single Tiger " On 7 July 1943, a single Tiger tank commanded by SS-Oberscharführer Franz Staudegger from the 2nd Platoon, 13th Panzer Company, 1st SS Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler engaged a group of about 50 T-34s around Psyolknee (the southern sector of the German salient in the Battle of Kursk). Staudegger used all his ammunition and claimed the destruction of 22 Soviet tanks ". The accurate number for total war time kill ratio is more like 5:1
mayamanign 1 year ago
@mayamanign there was a tank that easily could kill the Tiger and any german tank(including Tiger 2 and Jagdtiger).It was the JSU 152..with its huge 15,2 cm gun it killed many Elephants and Tigers at the battle of Kursk..battallions of JSU 152:s where very feared by the german heavy tank formations
nurmiar 1 year ago
Lol what? I'm comparing the two tanks in this game. I don't think the title of the game is "apples and oranges, tanks that would never meet". So yeah get a clue. Also, there are documented instances from Kursk that the Tigers kill ratio was pretty ridiculous, some of them 11 to 1. And that's against what people consider the best tank of the war. Against the lightly armored Sherman it would've been and was a slaughter. You're scenario also leans toward post Normandy conflict, where untrai
mayamanign 1 year ago
comparing 2 tank w/c is w/c the best the tiger or t34
12ock 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
those t-34s were pwned
8000jk 1 year ago
those t-34s were pwned
8000jk 1 year ago
Whoa, I don't want you to think I supported the spread of fascism or the subjugation and torture of millions. All I'm stating is the German army from a military standpoint, not a political or ideological standpoint. I give credit where it's due on military standpoint only. Like I said, if the Germans would have waited two years, had been more decentralized and not so dependent on hitlers orders, history would have been very different. Thank God it isn't.
mayamanign 1 year ago
ein uhr feindlicher jagdpanzer t-34 entfernung 1000 meter panzer granate laden SCHUSS!!! feindlicher panzer zerstört
SuperKill36 1 year ago
Another thing, you think the Germans would have stood pat in their designs? Again, if they would have not attacked Russia until 1944 or 1945, they not only would have total control of all of Europe and no second front. But also designs of advanced jet fighters, advanced tanks, and the facilities to build both in great numbers. It would have been even more terrible for the Russians. Thank history that the Nazis made the decisions they did.
mayamanign 1 year ago
@mayamanign i think you are completely correct but thank god that didn't happen or we today might all be nazis
Rebellion1718 1 year ago
Listen, I'm no German apologist. I go by the facts at hand. Given equal numbers in men, resources, and production capabilities, the Germans would have overtaken the soviets, period, end of story. I hate that people let their common sense be clouded by hate for the Nazi scumbags. We're not judging, just comparing militaries.
mayamanign 1 year ago
@mayamanign i totally get you, I believe that the German Army was the best trained and best equipped army at the time. People feel they cannot say that just because of the holocaust. Besides most German soldiers were just ordinary people who didn't play a hand in it. Looking back I think most of us would say that we would have supported the nazis knowing what the german people knew then as they were a party dedicated to improving german place in the world. Hindsight is why we don't applaud
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago
@14th20thKRHkickass Oddly enough this exactly the mindset of some people in Europe and America in the '30s. You could say this is the root of Chamberlains "appeasement". After all whats a little genocide, euthanasia, civilian butchery and Ghengis Khan like empire building compared to a pathological aversion to Communism. Small minds in the '30s and '40s thought exactly like you.
mrktwn 1 year ago
The t-35 is pwnidg
elvarbuk 1 year ago
"great triumph?" take a look @ the losses the russian army had during WW2 and you'll see that there was a triumph over the nazis but the only thing "great" about it was the losses on both sides.
s1mmelOne 1 year ago 2
All German tanks were a lot nicer, but the fact is that on battlefield T-34 was superior to Tiger. Tiger was just too unwieldy, while T-34 had light sloping armor, better suspension and more sophisticated aiming.
Retsiprooksus 1 year ago
@Retsiprooksus
Better question is which one would you rather be sitting in?
I'd sooner take a Tiger vs 50 T-34s than an IS2 in the same situation.
otester 1 year ago
@Retsiprooksus You can't possibly be serious? A T-34 isn't even in the same league as Tiger. One is a medium tank and the other is a heavy tank. If you want to go out joy riding or heavy recon, then a T-34 might be your ticket. But in terms of actually going toe to toe with an enemy, killing power, and protection the Tiger is like 1,000 times better (literally).
MetaVita 1 year ago
wow , turn the volume down you rancid fuck
Ilissill 1 year ago
I stand by my previous statement, the Tiger cannot pierce the armor of an IS-2 in all practicality, and the Panther would be hard pressed to pull off a kill.
I can't find any accuracy info for the Panther, but I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say it would be better due to higher muzzle velocity and a longer barrel. But I wouldn't expect anything more than a 20 percent improvement to base accuracy, and more likely around 10 percent realistically.
Elementlmage 1 year ago
games...?
crossaci 1 year ago
Lol the is2? Ummm the main battles were fiought with the t34. The is2 had minimal if any impact. Bottom line sheer numbers overwhelmed the Germans, this has been proven over again by historians, especially at the battle of Kursk where the Germans delta the Russians horrible losses despite being outnumbered at times 5 to 1. It's pretty common knowledge that the Germans lacked the numbers of men and equipment to ever win the war. If it were a even fight the Germans would have mopped the sovi
mayamanign 1 year ago
men thats a cool game...lools like the real thing
gyshalom 1 year ago
LOLWHAT?
mayamanign 1 year ago
Oh and the JSIII didn't even see service in WWII dude. It was not ready for action. If we're on the subject of tanks that didn't make it into the war I'm sure the Germans would have had something to counter it. The Tiger and subsequent King Tiger were both outdated designs and still ran amok on the battlefield. At kursk the Germans were ridiculously outnumbered and still gave the soviets 5 days of pure hell. With more equipment its pretty obvious the Germans would have mopped the soviets.
mayamanign 1 year ago
@mayamanign ur stupid dude it saw action at the very end when the russians invaded japan dumbass get ur facts straight
Jack878543 1 year ago
Tiger was like the scorpian getting stung by hundreds of ants.... Just too many T-34s for them to handle.
SaintsXLIVchamps 1 year ago
The Tiget Tank was the strongest of all tank during WWII. They crushed both American, and Soviet Union tanks. The problem was if the US, or Russia lost 100 tanks they could easily built 100 more, but if Nazi Germany lost 5 tiger tanks, that was a great problem for them. Also, the Tiger Tanks were heavy, and could easily be outmaneuver, but they make up that for the superior range.
oortiz915 1 year ago
@oortiz915 man.. JS III for far the most powerfull tank in the WW2 (though it arrived just few months before WW2 will be finished
orlandothx 1 year ago
The Tiger is all about 1 hit kills lol!
1 hitter quiters......
if a tiger was a boxer he would be some crazy ass hay maker guy.
like.......
BOOOOOOOM!
basicly a tiger tank is like a Barrett 50. cal...
boom head shots all day....
Howie262 1 year ago
Sound of discarded shell is teh best :)
AgentQuinn 1 year ago
The sounds of this game aren't very good appereantly.
onedOLlarDuDE 1 year ago
when u play the game the sounds is better but its noisy in the video!
rasfi1 1 year ago 2
Tiger > T-34
MadMilitiaMen 1 year ago 2
I am suprized the Germans , in the early part of the Russian campaign, were able to make a good fight against the t-34, using the undergunned mk III tanks, and short barrel mk IV. just shows how good the German tank men were at getting the most out of their machines.
Gamera49 1 year ago 2
The T34 didnt come out until later not during the the first months of the invasion
WhiteNationalist1000 1 year ago
thats not correct. frontal divisions had t-34 but they were used in isolation eg not in great numberes
msduicp 1 year ago
@WhiteNationalist1000
No, they were involved in the first months of barbarossa. Their production began in the summer of 1940 and barbarossa began in 1941.
onedOLlarDuDE 1 year ago
i didnt know the exact time when they came into production but german tanks used better tactics and stayed in groups and T34s seperated
WhiteNationalist1000 1 year ago
At 4:39 you missed a t-34 to your right.watch the muzzel blast:)
AlekseiR 1 year ago
can i please get a keygen for this game please
speeddemon006 1 year ago
the tiger tank in flank 88 for 10 mm or cm shield
19elgringo19 1 year ago
wat game is this?
hello99961 1 year ago
german tanks were a lot better
heil der wehrmacht
CheliozChev 1 year ago 2
Don't be so dogmatic. There were many instances where a T-34 defeated a Tiger II. Partially due to lower quality materials used by the Germans towards the end of the war, but the T-34 was pretty a good tank indeed.
It also scored kills against the more advanced M47 in Cyprus.
gerodinis 1 year ago
@CheliozChev For all their so called technological superiority the Germans failed to understand a good design in large numbers was more important then the ridiculous but limited numbers of tigers they produced.They nearly got it right with the panther but would have done better to just copy the T34 & build as many as possible. It terrified the panzer crews who first had to faced it. In total numbers the British (smallest of the 3main allies) built more tanks as well as purchasing17k US tanks.
binaway 1 year ago
@CheliozChev to bad about 100 of our soldiers took a big steamy shit in the riechstag
shawnshawn426 1 year ago
@CheliozChev sorry t34s were much superior. actually one of the main reasons that turned the tide of the war was t34. it has been admitted by the military weapons specialists of present as well as past. even the third reich admitted the design superiority of the t34.
sonny19xx 1 year ago
@CheliozChev thats why Germany lost the war..probably
nurmiar 1 year ago
Russians threw numbers at the Germans. Only the leader's tank had a radio in the Russian platoon. The Germans always tried to get him first, then the rest would not be able to organize their efforts. It was that way until the end of WW2. The Russians lost countless tank crews due to this.
uio890138 2 years ago
Didn't the Germans also have better opticals than the russians, which gave them an advantage in accuracy.
Gamera49 2 years ago
yes they had hve much better optics.
Kampfwagenkanone 1 year ago