You classical people can be such snobs just because he doesn't fine to tune every single thing he does doesn't mean its bad. Yeah it might not be as good as a hand full of other pianists but it is by no means 'bad'
oh come on, for those of you unlikers out there, i bet you can't even play it half as well. i play this piece...and believe me, it's not that easy to play.
Out of the all version's i've heard of, this is definitely the worst. Also I have to wonder how he is able to play it even this well with so awkward technique.
@Aul1kki Awkward technique? You've got no idea what you're talking about. There's not a single bit of awkward technique in this performance. Actually his technique is great, he made most of his mistakes at rather easy points compared to those more difficult ones he played flawlessly.
By the way, I play this piece myself and this is my favourite recording of it. (It's a pity Argerich doesn't play this though :P)
The comments for this video are ten pages of pure fucking bullshit. I cannot fucking believe the kind of audacious trash you people are spewing about this flawless performance. What empty, pointless lives you must lead. It's certainly easy enough for you to post your stupid criticism on youtube without actually taking it upon yourselves to create great art. It's a fucking insult and a tragedy to see these comments. It is no wonder at all to see society here on earth is such a fuck-up.
yes, there is a great deal of wrong notes, etc..... BUT.... He just nails it and plays it from the soul, that is why I like it freakin much. And the tempo he set.... heh... :)
Phwoar! Who cares if there are some wrong notes - there are an astonishing number of right ones, and I love that he just goes for the MUSIC and nails it.
well to all guys here who criticise without giving a real argument just one word: do it bbetter first before saying this is bad. Its wonderful in rythm and its horrible diffucult to play this !!!!!
Wait, I don't know what made me think it's a Steinway, I can't see 'STEINWAY AND SONS' anywhere in the video... I thought I did, but I don't know what I was thinking. Still a bad piano though.
I think it's a pretty good performance... a little to much banging around and the piano is UGLY, a Steinway, yes, but Steinway isn't THE piano anymore... it's cliche. Maybe it might just be the audio quality, but the piano, especially the lower notes, sounds bad and thin to me.
OMG!!! I just want to let you all know! Your awesome awesome critiques and ASTONISHING musical knowledge doesn't impress me at all!!! hahahaaa. just thought i'd let you guys know! :D LOLOL
This performance is riddled with ghost notes, wrong notes, awkward rubato (at the beginning), over-pedaling, and general tastelessness. Congratulations, Gavrilov can play it at a ridiculous tempo...too bad it sounds like the work of a blindfolded Namibian gorilla.
.... well. I dont know what u listen but to me was an incredible interpretation. Here the link of the same piece but performed many years after by Gavrilov. There is a difference. Would be nice to try to notice.
I am agree with u. Much better Richter ! No doubt ! But just think about the piece. It is not "easy" to play, interpretate or to listen for "us". Probably not a good test. The same argues are about Mephisto Waltz by Liszt. If u listen the old interpretation by Gavrilov u can say is much better than this one. I dont think is the best ever interpretation but I dont think is played as a "gorilla" :)
@coasterman16 : I've read your comment before listening the video and wanted to protest because I adore Gavrilov, But after seeing this video I see what you were talking about. He must have a very very bad day when this was recorded. Really awful.
@JayHarvester Agreed. Gavrilov plays with a very strong passion. In this day, he was probably arguing with hatred or anger, or maybe both. To play the piano, concentration is absolutely required, and for concentration, peace of mind is required. His head seems to be most likely in a real mess.
Gavrilov is a very good pianist, but that wasn't good in my opinion. I'm sorry, but I couldn't hear any of "prokofiev" in his play, it was only an uncontrolled hacking on the keys. Listen to Frederic Chiu, I think this is the best interpretation. (Sorry for my bad English, I'm German).
ich weiß, was du meinst.. keine direkten technischen mängel, aber es fehlt das "etwas".. die musikalische tiefe im hinblick auf das stück/den komponisten..
Salvo por lo excesivamente rubateado que está la introducción y algunos pequeños tropiezos durante el desarrollo, ésta es una de las versiones con más fuerza y sentimiento que he escuchado...
Fantastic. The reason why the late Gavrilov was not world-famous has never been unveiled. He has the technique and the supreme musical understanding and he was for some years been coached by the musical genius Svjatoslav Richter. Think about it. Today he his forgotten. The reasons? I won't expose them here for they are a shame for the Hero Culture.
Sorry, of course, it's a typo. I meant he's kind of dead in the musical world, not physically dead. Gavrilov has been one of those children who were forced to become a 'classical' player, by his mother, from age 3, and the scars are real. Svjatoslav Richter was talking about it in several TV interviews in France and in Germany.
The hero culture sacrifices the gifted child for the profits of cultural achievements, giving priority to the cultural hero to the detriment of the simple human. The danger is alienation and widespread robotism. See, for example, Alice Miller, The Drama of the Gifted Child: In Search for the True Self, New York: Basic Books, 1996; Thou Shalt Not Be Aware: Societys Betrayal of the Child, New York: Noonday, 1998.
There are alot of people who try to write music that is scary without visual aid. Very few are successful...this is one of three songs that actually frightens me when I listen to it, especially the very beginning.
Yes, i was lucky enough to hear him play this live as an encore to Rachmaninioff's Rhapsody on a Theme... It was far better in my view! Suits his character well.
i like the composer in all truthfulness the guy playing the piano does put a little bit of a bore on the piano it's self, he is just repeating a preformance that has been played in every country why not try somthing new, i love alot of Prokofiev's works it just the same thing with this musician it can become a bor.
Being honest... I've compared this perfomance with Frederic Chiu's play. There is something wrong, but Gavrilov completely failed at 1:23-1:26. Chiu is an 'ideal' perfomance, a 'yardstick' of Suggestion. That's just a matter of luck. Everyone has a right for failure, so don't blame Gavrilov so agressively. He has already received a portion of shame. ;)
ooh, i am usually a very forgiving critic, but I have played this piece and whoever said he is playing it sloppy is right...I would be a bit disappointed if I paid to hear this. There are lots of good things in it though
HEY GUYS!!!DONT TOUCH RUSSIAN PEOPLE SPECIALLY GREAT PIANISTS WHEN THEY PLAY RUSSIAN MUSIC!!!eheheh GAVRILOV IS GENIOUS SO JUST STOP WITH ALL THE CRITICS AND ENJOY HIS HUGE TALENT & MAGIC THAT HE PRODUCTS FROM PIANO!THANK YOU TO EXIST MAESTRO!
Thank you so much richteristhebest. I am an enormous fan of Andrei Gavrilov and I am absolutely sick at this constant vendetta against Gavrilov. He has fantastic talent. When I heard him recently playing Rachmaninov live he was amazingly good and masterful.The audience gave him a standing ovation.
why don't you tell that to the great russian personalities that forced prokofiev to emigrate, that called shostakovitch an enemy of the russian people and threatened him with a gulag session at best, and and and...
come down, russian friend, it is always worth to think before writing
I hate it when they compress the sound, the piano doesn't sound natural anymore.
Anyway, this performance is not bad at all, I recognize Prokofiev his playing in it. But for me Alexis Weissenberg is my favourite for this piece. But maybe in this piece I hear and FEEL more mephisto/diabolo... it's evil!! it's good.
i love gavrilov...he has such a brilliant touch, so pixie-ish... and i simply ADORED his interpretation of tchaikovsky's, first piano concerto, it was simply awsome, as is this.
I totally agree with you johnbaptistlulu. I have his early recording of it.His playing is so deep with interpretation and brilliance. I adore his Prokofiev Concerto 1 recording also.Magnificent!
It's by far the worst performance I've ever heard of this piece! My god! What does that extreme rubato mean at the beginning? And there are so many mistakes, he just almost play nothing right! It's fast but he should play it slower if he doesn't practice... Honestly, I know amateurs who could play it better! (And I do think I play it better..)
Geez! You should really record it if you think you play it better! Gavrilov has won the International Tchaikovsky competition and has been playing piano since the age of 5! It is his style, listen to some of his recordings of Rachmaninoff preludes and you'll see what I mean.
I don't say he's a bad pianist, I just say this recording is really awful! Even Richter or Horowitz played bad in some occasions... I don't really know much about Gavrilov but this recording is bullshit! He obviously just didn't practice enough... Listen to Prokofiev's one to compare... I also plan on recording myself playing this piece.
Wha´s wrong???or worst?? It´s a great perfomance, the beggining is the intoduction, suspense!!, or you want it fast too?? it´s better be quiet when your comment sucks! they are a couple notes there but the interpretation it´s great
If you knew about Prokofiev you would be shocked by this extreme rubato of the introduction... totally contradicts the spirit of the piece. Then, in the fast sections, it's not just "a few notes" that are off, but really most of them... It's not acceptable from a professional pianist! Or it is, but then it's not to be considered as a highlight or anything... He was just on a bad day!
that's one of my favourite prokofiev pieces, but I heard some mistakes at 0:50 or 0:51 and after the glissando, but this is the best performance i've ever heard of this piece.
I heard him play the Rachmaninov No3 Concerto live the other night in Dublin, he really gave a fantastic performance.People gave him a standing ovation.
You classical people can be such snobs just because he doesn't fine to tune every single thing he does doesn't mean its bad. Yeah it might not be as good as a hand full of other pianists but it is by no means 'bad'
def3mno62 2 months ago
oh come on, for those of you unlikers out there, i bet you can't even play it half as well. i play this piece...and believe me, it's not that easy to play.
THEmusicgurl98 4 months ago in playlist Prokofiev Diabolical Suggestion
the tone production isn't that great....
i really liked kissin and chiu for this one
monkeydude512 8 months ago
too rushed! technique not polished enough! more emotion! my goodness!
InuKitty1995 9 months ago
He's just not that into it.
dobiegee 11 months ago
I like Chiu's version better, also. But, you have to admit - anyone who can play this is amazing!!
BettyCope 1 year ago
Out of the all version's i've heard of, this is definitely the worst. Also I have to wonder how he is able to play it even this well with so awkward technique.
Aul1kki 1 year ago
@Aul1kki Awkward technique? You've got no idea what you're talking about. There's not a single bit of awkward technique in this performance. Actually his technique is great, he made most of his mistakes at rather easy points compared to those more difficult ones he played flawlessly.
By the way, I play this piece myself and this is my favourite recording of it. (It's a pity Argerich doesn't play this though :P)
trpttrt 1 year ago
The comments for this video are ten pages of pure fucking bullshit. I cannot fucking believe the kind of audacious trash you people are spewing about this flawless performance. What empty, pointless lives you must lead. It's certainly easy enough for you to post your stupid criticism on youtube without actually taking it upon yourselves to create great art. It's a fucking insult and a tragedy to see these comments. It is no wonder at all to see society here on earth is such a fuck-up.
Reaper978 1 year ago 3
@Reaper978 agreed, they dont come much more raw than this, especially with the high-caliber pianists. its awesome to see one of them decide to rock
bryan16love6love 8 months ago
Umm, sum this up in 3 words
Terrible... Piano ....Playing.
chaosdude14 1 year ago
very bad
predoje 1 year ago
was he in a hurry ? he played it like he remembered he left something on the stove...
alexisgud2 1 year ago
yes, there is a great deal of wrong notes, etc..... BUT.... He just nails it and plays it from the soul, that is why I like it freakin much. And the tempo he set.... heh... :)
MerrekSK 1 year ago
Alright, it's not the greatest recording ever, but how many people can play this piece as well as him at that tempo?
I sure can't.
laundrylint 1 year ago
Mi piace, è bravo. La trovo una esecuzione più che decente.
Danilocompositore 1 year ago
Phwoar! Who cares if there are some wrong notes - there are an astonishing number of right ones, and I love that he just goes for the MUSIC and nails it.
rjdotorg 1 year ago
It's quite dirty, yeah, but not bad. It's the only performance I've seen so far with enough devil in it, imo. :)
trpttrt 2 years ago 4
This is it!
kuglagerfeld 2 years ago 2
well to all guys here who criticise without giving a real argument just one word: do it bbetter first before saying this is bad. Its wonderful in rythm and its horrible diffucult to play this !!!!!
uhartchristian 2 years ago 3
This is the first time I've ever been disappointed with Andrei Gavrilov....
Nevertheless, thank you for sharing this, Sepharite.
simonetr81 2 years ago
its very bad and dirty
pampiliong 2 years ago
Very many mistakes
brazdipr 2 years ago
Good, but watch up the perfomance when he was younger, he had a best rendition
alexmanzo19 2 years ago
woao!!!!
amazing!!!
fabizorrito 2 years ago
Wait, I don't know what made me think it's a Steinway, I can't see 'STEINWAY AND SONS' anywhere in the video... I thought I did, but I don't know what I was thinking. Still a bad piano though.
codeman2008 2 years ago
I think it's a pretty good performance... a little to much banging around and the piano is UGLY, a Steinway, yes, but Steinway isn't THE piano anymore... it's cliche. Maybe it might just be the audio quality, but the piano, especially the lower notes, sounds bad and thin to me.
codeman2008 2 years ago
What an awful performance!
Frederic Chiu is far better.
mauriciostarosta 2 years ago
listen to Richter's performance and after that listen to Gavrilov's. I promise you will hear the difference.
LeAzEMOval 2 years ago
OMG!!! I just want to let you all know! Your awesome awesome critiques and ASTONISHING musical knowledge doesn't impress me at all!!! hahahaaa. just thought i'd let you guys know! :D LOLOL
PianoManSteve 2 years ago 4
gavrilov always prefers piano to music...
hedones 2 years ago
1.03 and 1.04,toooootally wrong
strangehands89 2 years ago
LOL! Look for "Moonlight sonata with comments" I think they put you in there =/
Pianisteny2k 2 years ago
This performance is riddled with ghost notes, wrong notes, awkward rubato (at the beginning), over-pedaling, and general tastelessness. Congratulations, Gavrilov can play it at a ridiculous tempo...too bad it sounds like the work of a blindfolded Namibian gorilla.
coasterman16 2 years ago 6
ahaha. That's hilarious. After listening to other versions, I take back the "brilliance". But whatev. xD
Sepharite 2 years ago
I think that Gavrilov only wanted to show his virtuoso playing. Nothing else.
09Benavides 2 years ago
@coasterman16 Yes, but well... you see... nevertheless, it surely IS diabolical :D
vivvpprof 1 year ago
@coasterman16
.... well. I dont know what u listen but to me was an incredible interpretation. Here the link of the same piece but performed many years after by Gavrilov. There is a difference. Would be nice to try to notice.
ww w.youtube.com/watch?v=V1AMGAq2pWs
LukeMD 1 year ago
@LukeMD I listen to Richter. His performance is astronomically profound, controlled, and intense.
coasterman16 1 year ago
@coasterman16
I am agree with u. Much better Richter ! No doubt ! But just think about the piece. It is not "easy" to play, interpretate or to listen for "us". Probably not a good test. The same argues are about Mephisto Waltz by Liszt. If u listen the old interpretation by Gavrilov u can say is much better than this one. I dont think is the best ever interpretation but I dont think is played as a "gorilla" :)
LukeMD 1 year ago
@coasterman16 : I've read your comment before listening the video and wanted to protest because I adore Gavrilov, But after seeing this video I see what you were talking about. He must have a very very bad day when this was recorded. Really awful.
JayHarvester 1 year ago
@JayHarvester To be honest, his producer or whatever contacted me to take down the video a long time ago.... I regret not taking it down.
Sepharite 1 year ago
@Sepharite Still not too late...Never too late for this one.
pila406 8 months ago
@JayHarvester Agreed. Gavrilov plays with a very strong passion. In this day, he was probably arguing with hatred or anger, or maybe both. To play the piano, concentration is absolutely required, and for concentration, peace of mind is required. His head seems to be most likely in a real mess.
stormiel 4 months ago
i prefer prokofiev's version ;)
classique321 2 years ago 4
Wow just perfect!!!
alexmanzo19 2 years ago
Evgeny kissin's interpetation on 3/24 in Taipei is the best !!
gcaee 2 years ago
yeah..i was sitting there!
andreichiu01 2 years ago
Not as good by Richter, by a long shot...
weikko79 2 years ago
Gavrilov is a very good pianist, but that wasn't good in my opinion. I'm sorry, but I couldn't hear any of "prokofiev" in his play, it was only an uncontrolled hacking on the keys. Listen to Frederic Chiu, I think this is the best interpretation. (Sorry for my bad English, I'm German).
shaermy 2 years ago 7
Hey, your English is better than most of the people who post comments on YouTube.
antmanmax1 2 years ago 3
ich weiß, was du meinst.. keine direkten technischen mängel, aber es fehlt das "etwas".. die musikalische tiefe im hinblick auf das stück/den komponisten..
dennoch besser, als ich es kann :D
mystique400 2 years ago 3
this is high end of clssic´n roll.
Awesome !!!!!
drjekyll66 3 years ago 2
DG plays it.
kovieraite 3 years ago
Escuchen el Scriabin de Gavrilov, en verdad es fascinante.
luisalvaz 3 years ago
INCREÍBLE!!!
Salvo por lo excesivamente rubateado que está la introducción y algunos pequeños tropiezos durante el desarrollo, ésta es una de las versiones con más fuerza y sentimiento que he escuchado...
EXCELENTE, DE NO CREER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Sirtnat 3 years ago
Fantastic. The reason why the late Gavrilov was not world-famous has never been unveiled. He has the technique and the supreme musical understanding and he was for some years been coached by the musical genius Svjatoslav Richter. Think about it. Today he his forgotten. The reasons? I won't expose them here for they are a shame for the Hero Culture.
ipublica 3 years ago
Gavrilov is not dead yet...
jero13595 3 years ago
Sorry, of course, it's a typo. I meant he's kind of dead in the musical world, not physically dead. Gavrilov has been one of those children who were forced to become a 'classical' player, by his mother, from age 3, and the scars are real. Svjatoslav Richter was talking about it in several TV interviews in France and in Germany.
ipublica 3 years ago
The hero culture sacrifices the gifted child for the profits of cultural achievements, giving priority to the cultural hero to the detriment of the simple human. The danger is alienation and widespread robotism. See, for example, Alice Miller, The Drama of the Gifted Child: In Search for the True Self, New York: Basic Books, 1996; Thou Shalt Not Be Aware: Societys Betrayal of the Child, New York: Noonday, 1998.
ipublica 3 years ago
there is no hero without tragedy.
But to put everything online physically ,mentally ,emotionally
(without becoming a criminal)
must be a enormous privilege as well
dereczynski 2 years ago
Humongous hands.
fdaltrey 3 years ago
wow. it really sounds evil a lot XD
Great performance!!! Superb
lovespianola 3 years ago
this piece is hard X b i wish i could play it that well
kosephdrums 3 years ago
he is good. i like gyorgi sanders version better. still really good. he makes it creepy!
acridplacidity3 3 years ago
There are alot of people who try to write music that is scary without visual aid. Very few are successful...this is one of three songs that actually frightens me when I listen to it, especially the very beginning.
DontBlameThePianist 3 years ago
The ending of the performance is just great. He's basiclally like, yeah, that was awesome, and I am finished!
robert982 3 years ago 3
in this piece is all the pureness of prokofiev
i like it
likeclassicmusic 3 years ago
Yes, i was lucky enough to hear him play this live as an encore to Rachmaninioff's Rhapsody on a Theme... It was far better in my view! Suits his character well.
cynic150 3 years ago
The person who posted this does not agree with you guys. It clearly is a brilliant performance..............pft.
tranceoxide 3 years ago
lets chat
Brentor14 3 years ago
i like the composer in all truthfulness the guy playing the piano does put a little bit of a bore on the piano it's self, he is just repeating a preformance that has been played in every country why not try somthing new, i love alot of Prokofiev's works it just the same thing with this musician it can become a bor.
beerfan12 3 years ago
This performance can be considered as non- existent.
allegrissimo 3 years ago
AHAHAHAHAH....you posted my comment for me.
tranceoxide 3 years ago
As usual Gavrilov ends up raping the piano...sigh
coasterman16 3 years ago
Being honest... I've compared this perfomance with Frederic Chiu's play. There is something wrong, but Gavrilov completely failed at 1:23-1:26. Chiu is an 'ideal' perfomance, a 'yardstick' of Suggestion. That's just a matter of luck. Everyone has a right for failure, so don't blame Gavrilov so agressively. He has already received a portion of shame. ;)
f1f1s 3 years ago
mabe he had a bad day!?!
Querfahrer69 3 years ago
I've heard this piece performed with a number of errors before, but I've never heard a PROFESSIONAL make so many mistakes!
Normally, I can forigve mistakes if they make up for it with expression... but this interpretation just doesn't cut it.
How did this man get to professional status by playing like this?
demonicadvent 3 years ago 3
ooh, i am usually a very forgiving critic, but I have played this piece and whoever said he is playing it sloppy is right...I would be a bit disappointed if I paid to hear this. There are lots of good things in it though
raidenciv 3 years ago
whats brilliante in this?
02dezsoe 3 years ago
HEY GUYS!!!DONT TOUCH RUSSIAN PEOPLE SPECIALLY GREAT PIANISTS WHEN THEY PLAY RUSSIAN MUSIC!!!eheheh GAVRILOV IS GENIOUS SO JUST STOP WITH ALL THE CRITICS AND ENJOY HIS HUGE TALENT & MAGIC THAT HE PRODUCTS FROM PIANO!THANK YOU TO EXIST MAESTRO!
richteristhebest 3 years ago
Thank you so much richteristhebest. I am an enormous fan of Andrei Gavrilov and I am absolutely sick at this constant vendetta against Gavrilov. He has fantastic talent. When I heard him recently playing Rachmaninov live he was amazingly good and masterful.The audience gave him a standing ovation.
cattleman6420012000 3 years ago
why don't you tell that to the great russian personalities that forced prokofiev to emigrate, that called shostakovitch an enemy of the russian people and threatened him with a gulag session at best, and and and...
come down, russian friend, it is always worth to think before writing
kalouuri 3 years ago
well i am russian & there r bad people everywhere specially in every govermnent!ok?so just relax!
richteristhebest 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great Power!!
Anyone else notice that there is a 50 % chance that he might be gay? He's all bling-ed up. =]
lilpep4ever 3 years ago
I hate it when they compress the sound, the piano doesn't sound natural anymore.
Anyway, this performance is not bad at all, I recognize Prokofiev his playing in it. But for me Alexis Weissenberg is my favourite for this piece. But maybe in this piece I hear and FEEL more mephisto/diabolo... it's evil!! it's good.
michieldpiano 3 years ago 2
Sloppy.
hessianihil 4 years ago
This is a brilliant performance with so much passion and musical feeling.
cattleman6420012000 4 years ago
Are you being sarcastic????
coaster1000 4 years ago
Don't be so stupid!
cattleman6420012000 4 years ago
i love gavrilov...he has such a brilliant touch, so pixie-ish... and i simply ADORED his interpretation of tchaikovsky's, first piano concerto, it was simply awsome, as is this.
johnbaptistlulu 4 years ago
I totally agree with you johnbaptistlulu. I have his early recording of it.His playing is so deep with interpretation and brilliance. I adore his Prokofiev Concerto 1 recording also.Magnificent!
cattleman6420012000 4 years ago
phenomenal.
sviatoslavberezovsky 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is an etude for rachmaninoff not profiev.. dumb
munadel123 4 years ago
this is prokofiev and not rachmaninoff! .. dumb yourself!
skate4joy 4 years ago 8
very good
...uff
Donpianist 4 years ago
The tru fury demonstrates its acceptability.
I personally really like this.
You don't have the right to say what you said, really.
dnephi 5 years ago
:s what is he doing?
stridje 5 years ago
It's by far the worst performance I've ever heard of this piece! My god! What does that extreme rubato mean at the beginning? And there are so many mistakes, he just almost play nothing right! It's fast but he should play it slower if he doesn't practice... Honestly, I know amateurs who could play it better! (And I do think I play it better..)
godelike 5 years ago
Geez! You should really record it if you think you play it better! Gavrilov has won the International Tchaikovsky competition and has been playing piano since the age of 5! It is his style, listen to some of his recordings of Rachmaninoff preludes and you'll see what I mean.
arantiztacci 5 years ago
I don't say he's a bad pianist, I just say this recording is really awful! Even Richter or Horowitz played bad in some occasions... I don't really know much about Gavrilov but this recording is bullshit! He obviously just didn't practice enough... Listen to Prokofiev's one to compare... I also plan on recording myself playing this piece.
godelike 5 years ago
I have just bought his Chopin etudes recording and that is fantastic.
cattleman6420012000 4 years ago
These times are long gone... arantiz...
francorussie 3 years ago
Wha´s wrong???or worst?? It´s a great perfomance, the beggining is the intoduction, suspense!!, or you want it fast too?? it´s better be quiet when your comment sucks! they are a couple notes there but the interpretation it´s great
!
sgh31 5 years ago
If you knew about Prokofiev you would be shocked by this extreme rubato of the introduction... totally contradicts the spirit of the piece. Then, in the fast sections, it's not just "a few notes" that are off, but really most of them... It's not acceptable from a professional pianist! Or it is, but then it's not to be considered as a highlight or anything... He was just on a bad day!
godelike 5 years ago
man, i can't wait to hear you...
johnbaptistlulu 4 years ago 2
yes, the best...
Yaniss 5 years ago
that's one of my favourite prokofiev pieces, but I heard some mistakes at 0:50 or 0:51 and after the glissando, but this is the best performance i've ever heard of this piece.
Werwolf2x 5 years ago
I heard him play the Rachmaninov No3 Concerto live the other night in Dublin, he really gave a fantastic performance.People gave him a standing ovation.
cattleman6420012000 4 years ago
Pianiszmmm!
MMM613 5 years ago
Fantastic to hear this. Amazing playing.
cattleman6420012000 5 years ago