These people are enemies of the USA: Sean Hannity, Laura Ingram, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly. Like religious and political zealots in the Mid East, they prey upon ignorance and stupidity to manipulate. Fear and anger. Limbaugh even calls people to violence, asking, "When is it our turn to riot?" Ingram links Obama to Charles Manson. President Obama is an entirely patriotic, brilliant, dedicated, trustworthy American citizen. Shame on them for taking unfair advantage the ignorant.
Regardless of your political views, NBC is walking a dangerous line by allowing MSNBC personalities to participate in NBC newscasts, etc. NBC should distance itself from KO and CM and this will blow over.
Don't cite media bias when fox news' "political analyst" is Karl Rove. Former GOP knee-breaker Rove here to give us an unbiased account of events? Give me a break.
Are you kidding me? I've seen Rove very critical of Republicans. I don't think you'd see that kind of criticism of Dems from anyone on MSNBC. I don't think they're allowed.
Rove has been pretty critical, but never regarding the president. In that matter he only criticised some of Bush's staff choices.
For example, Olbermann, on the other hand, has attacked dems in the house, Pelosi, even the candidates themselves (even though Obama only slightly).
Sure, MSNBC is blue and Fox is red, but I think people should be much more critical regarding Fox, as Fox is taking the easy way of supporting the government.
Well, it might have been an attempt to distort the answer, but, take a look at Bush's answer: having been asked about the "appeasement" comment, he replied with merely restating his position without touching the analogy at all. Bush didn't actually answer the question. What was there for the editors to show then?
These people are enemies of the USA: Sean Hannity, Laura Ingram, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly. Like religious and political zealots in the Mid East, they prey upon ignorance and stupidity to manipulate. Fear and anger. Limbaugh even calls people to violence, asking, "When is it our turn to riot?" Ingram links Obama to Charles Manson. President Obama is an entirely patriotic, brilliant, dedicated, trustworthy American citizen. Shame on them for taking unfair advantage the ignorant.
hkrichardson 3 years ago
LOLOL Your funny. Comedy Central Funny. Yea, and Gen G. Patton was a Nazi and really worked for Hitler. LOLOL
idiotfinder911 3 years ago
Ingraham is just a charlatan she has not clue what real journalism is.
VALDIGNE 3 years ago
Fox criticizing news casting?! Fox is pure entertainment for ratings owned by a corporation. PLease! This is hypocritical!
Heny4563 3 years ago
I agree! The media should NEVER edit Bush's comments. That way he would be exposed to the public as the uninformed dolt that he really is.
daja2k 3 years ago
Regardless of your political views, NBC is walking a dangerous line by allowing MSNBC personalities to participate in NBC newscasts, etc. NBC should distance itself from KO and CM and this will blow over.
rickrudd 3 years ago
the editing was a deliberate attempt to distort by NBC.
they cut a full six min of the Interview just thank if foxnews did this front page story
deznuts1980 3 years ago
Don't cite media bias when fox news' "political analyst" is Karl Rove. Former GOP knee-breaker Rove here to give us an unbiased account of events? Give me a break.
mrfguitar 3 years ago
Are you kidding me? I've seen Rove very critical of Republicans. I don't think you'd see that kind of criticism of Dems from anyone on MSNBC. I don't think they're allowed.
fjwjr 3 years ago
Rove has been pretty critical, but never regarding the president. In that matter he only criticised some of Bush's staff choices.
For example, Olbermann, on the other hand, has attacked dems in the house, Pelosi, even the candidates themselves (even though Obama only slightly).
Sure, MSNBC is blue and Fox is red, but I think people should be much more critical regarding Fox, as Fox is taking the easy way of supporting the government.
Polytical 3 years ago
Well, it might have been an attempt to distort the answer, but, take a look at Bush's answer: having been asked about the "appeasement" comment, he replied with merely restating his position without touching the analogy at all. Bush didn't actually answer the question. What was there for the editors to show then?
Polytical 3 years ago