Charles is an idiot. Does this insecure nut really think he is all that important? He really blew it when he betrayed all he allegedly stood for and tried to go to the other side. The other side wants nothing to do with him and that is one of the few good things about them!
Can I just tell you, I wasn't ever on LGF back in the day. Hell I really only discovered what the true blogosphere was like less than a year ago. But I have to say this LGF story is something truly fascinating on so many levels. This guy is an unreal case study in psychosis.
I had the pleasure of having CJ ban me himself...after daring to question the cherry-picked comments in the regular "HotAir" bashing threads...I was labeled a "sock puppet" and after three whole comments (which were deleted promptly) my account happily failed to work. LGF is a lost cause...
Kilgore Trout, Sharmuta, IceWeasel, this could be any one of 'em. Just facets of Charles' own identity, mere sockpuppets along for the ride. Well, except for IceWeasel, who seems a better writer than CJ.
I'd like to meet up with IceWeasel on a neutral site, off the 'Reservation of the CJ Replications' . He wouldn't survive for a minute without the protections of CJ's ban skirt. None of 'em would, not even Charles himself.
LOL this is great. Johnson is an insecure, mentally ill, not-quite-as-smart-as-he-thinks-he-is douchebag. I would love to see his blood pressure charted as he watches these.
I wonder why he feels so threatened. Usually people only lash out like that when they have doubts and are unable to handle them, thus they lash out at anything that reminds them of those doubts.
and, after he bans you, he lies about you. in one case he actually made up fake text for a post he deleted.
today he wrote this: "[van jones is being smeared as a 'truther' when all he did was sign on to] a simple, legitimate call for further investigations"
you know: "just asking questions."
when someone asked why that's different from "birthers" using the dishonest trope of "just asking questions", he banned them.
so it once was for truthers too, but jones is a four-legged truther.
Sadly, the damn ban stick got me too... for up-dinging an "unpopular" comment. Thoughtcrime! Double-plus ungood! I found out the hard way there really is no room for divergent opinions at LGF.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You should go to LGF and look through the archives. You're not the only one claiming to have been banned unfairly. Problem is, most of the people who complain either lie about it, like a certain "Angry White Dude"(search for it), or have been repeating the same stuff over and over or responding with insults when being called out. That's my experience in the Creationism threads. But who knows, perhaps I'll be banned too and then see your side of the argument.
"Most" being ban-worthy is a mischaracterization. "Some" would fit better. Me, I never posted insults, or repetetively cut 'n pasted, or anything like that. I really was banned for hitting the little green + on a comment by VegasRick. At the bottom of that thread Charles made a post mentioning "Paulian sleepers". I suppose I was a suspected Ron-Paul sleeper troll. Which is false. VegasRick was reinstated despite his thoughcrime... I however, was not.
Charles is an idiot. Does this insecure nut really think he is all that important? He really blew it when he betrayed all he allegedly stood for and tried to go to the other side. The other side wants nothing to do with him and that is one of the few good things about them!
underzog 5 months ago
Surrender
GrounderTheRobot 1 year ago
LGF became a circle jerk, sausage party
good riddance
ripley450 2 years ago 2
To the right he's a traitor and to the left he's a Muslim-basher.
He's finished.
Max20854 2 years ago
Can I just tell you, I wasn't ever on LGF back in the day. Hell I really only discovered what the true blogosphere was like less than a year ago. But I have to say this LGF story is something truly fascinating on so many levels. This guy is an unreal case study in psychosis.
thatsrightdotcom 2 years ago
Yep any reference to that moron sharmuta is definitely worth a laugh!
tedzilla99 2 years ago 2
Know what? I don't think KKKilgore Trout is ever this calm when it comes to LGF.....
Paladin3000 2 years ago 5
is he nuts?? nooooo, he's insaaane!
pizzaeater6000 2 years ago
What is the video from?
7beers 2 years ago
I had the pleasure of having CJ ban me himself...after daring to question the cherry-picked comments in the regular "HotAir" bashing threads...I was labeled a "sock puppet" and after three whole comments (which were deleted promptly) my account happily failed to work. LGF is a lost cause...
jetboy33 2 years ago
Funny shit. True, but funny.
nettec 2 years ago 2
LOL this is so right. I used to read little green footballs until it became the cult of Charles Johnson.
dajokn19 2 years ago 5
Funny!
landline00 2 years ago 2
Hilarious! LGF has run completely off the rails. I guess saying that makes me a white supremacist or birther or something.
rsrobin2 2 years ago 7
Hilarious!
Kilgore Trout, Sharmuta, IceWeasel, this could be any one of 'em. Just facets of Charles' own identity, mere sockpuppets along for the ride. Well, except for IceWeasel, who seems a better writer than CJ.
I'd like to meet up with IceWeasel on a neutral site, off the 'Reservation of the CJ Replications' . He wouldn't survive for a minute without the protections of CJ's ban skirt. None of 'em would, not even Charles himself.
C'mon, Iceweasel. I'll be your huckleberry.
Serr8d 2 years ago 5
It's funny because it's true..
dsriddle13 2 years ago 3
Tee hee. The madness is not even exaggerated.
stucke17 2 years ago 6
Yeah, I got banned too for up-dinging his comment. CJ is laughingstock now...
bastian33o2 2 years ago 5
Ban stick Hits!
Hilarious because it is so true
recklessprocess 2 years ago 4
LOL
Percopius 2 years ago 2
This looks like a typical day with a PC running Windows ME.
huntercentury 2 years ago
LOL this is great. Johnson is an insecure, mentally ill, not-quite-as-smart-as-he-thinks-he-is douchebag. I would love to see his blood pressure charted as he watches these.
smitty1276 2 years ago 14
Mad King Charles indeed.
I wonder why he feels so threatened. Usually people only lash out like that when they have doubts and are unable to handle them, thus they lash out at anything that reminds them of those doubts.
VALivingston 2 years ago
Charles Johnson may be the biggest dickhead on the internet.
mcsadapted 2 years ago 2
Haha, totally true. I got banned from there. Too bad about LGF. Charles did good stuff back in the Dan Rather days.
ierig 2 years ago 6
It's funny how things come full circle. Charles Johnson is now Dan Rather.
Dan Rather="I'll believe it when someone can prove those documents are falsified"
CJ="I'll believe it when someone can find me evidence Van was a Truther"
Well evidence exists for both, but their will admit it
Monty1994 2 years ago 6
and, after he bans you, he lies about you. in one case he actually made up fake text for a post he deleted.
today he wrote this: "[van jones is being smeared as a 'truther' when all he did was sign on to] a simple, legitimate call for further investigations"
you know: "just asking questions."
when someone asked why that's different from "birthers" using the dishonest trope of "just asking questions", he banned them.
so it once was for truthers too, but jones is a four-legged truther.
clemtoe 2 years ago 3
Ban stick hits! Ban stick hits! LoL!
Sadly, the damn ban stick got me too... for up-dinging an "unpopular" comment. Thoughtcrime! Double-plus ungood! I found out the hard way there really is no room for divergent opinions at LGF.
MasterSgtSlappy 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You should go to LGF and look through the archives. You're not the only one claiming to have been banned unfairly. Problem is, most of the people who complain either lie about it, like a certain "Angry White Dude"(search for it), or have been repeating the same stuff over and over or responding with insults when being called out. That's my experience in the Creationism threads. But who knows, perhaps I'll be banned too and then see your side of the argument.
EikC 2 years ago
"Most" being ban-worthy is a mischaracterization. "Some" would fit better. Me, I never posted insults, or repetetively cut 'n pasted, or anything like that. I really was banned for hitting the little green + on a comment by VegasRick. At the bottom of that thread Charles made a post mentioning "Paulian sleepers". I suppose I was a suspected Ron-Paul sleeper troll. Which is false. VegasRick was reinstated despite his thoughcrime... I however, was not.
MasterSgtSlappy 2 years ago 7
LOL, so true.
FUCK LGF
jairam1985 2 years ago 10