R.Dawkins ist der Capitän Francesco Schettino des Wissenschaftsbetriebs, der das Schiff der exakten Naturwissenschaften in die Havarie der atheistischen Halbwissenschaften zusteuert. Mit seinem waghalsigen Manöver eines Hasardeurs wird er unzählige Passagiere der "Costa Scienza" in die unmoralische Vernunftlosigkeit kentern.
hey y'all religious folk, if ye dont wipe us all out guess whats gonna happen in 100-200 years all our future generations are gonna sit around drinking beer and laughing at the crap you (and most of us at one stage) believed in , its safe to say you wont agree with this but it will happen, i prayed to the butter on me toast this morning and it gave me a sign...OOuuuuuuuuOOUuuuu
It's funny how you have to edit videos to get a terrible argument and bigoted mindset from an Atheist, but you can find the same thing in a religious person without even looking :)
Only a REAL FOOL would claim there is no God! Man creates awesome skyscrapers, fake hearts, tunnels, vehicles etc.. If we are very imperfect then what more can God create THE UNIVERSE! You must accept Jesus Christ as your Savior to receive eternal rest in heaven! Simple! John 3:16 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him! Repent & accept Jesus Christ! Jesus Christ or HELL?!? Visit cbn. com
@TheWhitewolf15770 IF YOUR RIGHT AND I AM WRONG NOTHING HAPPENS!! IF I AM RIGHT AND YOUR WRONG DUMBASS YOU GO TO HELL! YOU NEED TO GET YOUR SHIT BIRD HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS WHICH HAS BEEN THERE FOREVER IT APPEARS! YOU NEED TO REPENT AND SEEK GOD THROUGH JESUS CHRIST BEFORE YOU GO TO YOUR PERMANENT HOME CALLED HELL WITH OUT UTTER DARKNESS AND FLAMES! HELL IS NEAR! REPENT JESUS IS WAITING DUMMY!
@tigersforchrist Good science is based on PROVABLE,TESTABLE truths, Religion just trys to force you to believe blindly without question and threatens you if you dont, You really need to see the youtube video richard dawkins what if your wrong which answers your question. Its obvious to me that your part of problem rather than the solution. I am not interested in the ancient writings of the mentally ill sorry
Your not saved by church, religion, good works Your saved by the grace of God through faith not of yourselves It is the gift of God not of works lest any man should boast. Freemason illuminatists are worshipers of lucifer a goat called the baphomet These satanists created atheists, mormons, jehovah witnesses, and many other false religions only to turn you away from the truth of the bible, to not believe in God because God is Love. They have done this so you give up your rights, New World Order
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. Given enough time, all of the energy becomes useless and the universe cannot be sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
The first part is true, which is why cosmologists think the universe may eventually suffer from heat death. But entropy has to do with the transfer and conversion of energy. It has nothing to do with order, chaos, or complexity.
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
It's very common for people not versed in how science functions to see debate within a field and view it as subversive. In reality debate is integral to the process of uncovering truth. Debate and disagreement don't mean there is anything wrong, it's the very process by which science works and we actually learn.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
R.Dawkins ist der Capitän Francesco Schettino des Wissenschaftsbetriebs, der das Schiff der exakten Naturwissenschaften in die Havarie der atheistischen Halbwissenschaften zusteuert. Mit seinem waghalsigen Manöver eines Hasardeurs wird er unzählige Passagiere der "Costa Scienza" in die unmoralische Vernunftlosigkeit kentern.
Dr. Dawkins: "I think it matters what's true, because the truth is beautiful, it's exciting, it's inspiring... There's almost nothing I could imagine more worthwhile spending your life doing than understanding the truth of why you have a life at all in the first place."
I hate it when people say "Why do you have to be right?" It is literally an invitation to be wrong. They might as well say, "Can you please be wrong for a second?" And to that I answer, "No."
Richard Dawkins ist Francesco Schettino des Wissenschaftsbetriebs, der das Schiff der exakten Naturwissenschaften in die Havarie der atheistischen Halbwissenschaften zusteuert. Mit seinem waghalsigen Manöver eines Hasardeurs wird er die unzähligen Passanten der "Costa Scienza" in die unmoralische Vernunftlosigkeit kentern.
Ironically, this is probably the way the real interview would go. Phil (Who isn't a real doctor by the way) And Prof. Dawkins always having to deal with ignornant pricks.
Dr. Phil is a doctor. When one earns a Doctorate degree, which Dr. Phil has (PhD), that person also earns the title of "Doctor". He may no longer have a private practice, but that does not take away his degree and title as Doctor.
@RoberMatts Atheists can't take the heat. At the end of the day they are the sour losers and will never admit that they are wrong, even when they are proven wrong. The arrogance is mind boggling and scary.
@SteelerEagleFan of course dude. Atheism is nothing but another faith. I have always asked them if they can disprove god and they never reply or some of them just say something stupid. If they have no proof why god doesn't exist and they still believe it, that would be considered a faith. It doesn't take a genius to figure that one out, faith is believe in something with a lack of evidence.
God can't be disproved because god is an unfalsifiable hypothesis. No matter how much rationality and proof I can give towards the impossibility of a god, you could always say god is greater than rationality and proof. Also, Atheism is the rejection of any false deity - whether it be Zues or Thor or the christian god, for example. Also, you said "If they have no proof why god doesn't exist and they still believe it...". If they believe in god, they're not Atheists.
Obviously the people you mistook for Atheists weren't very smart. Message me if you want to know the true stance of a relatively intelligent Atheist, or if you just want to debate the reality vs non-reality of a god.
@Theboxer500 Atheists don't have to disprove the existence of gods. Theists claim a god or gods exist, so it's up to them to provide the evidence. Atheism does not rely on faith. It doesn't take faith to reject unsubstantiated claims about gods or anything else.
@YY4Me133 look the theists have spoken spoken... we believe in god and have faith, and atheists are always trying to prove us wrong and fail to disprove god. Atheism is a blind faith with no evidence to back it's claim up. BTW believing in something without evidence is called faith and thats what atheism is. You believe there is no god yet you have no proof.
@Theboxer500 You can't disprove a negative. So to ask such a thing is ignorant and impossible and honestly doesn't even make any sense. The burden of proof is with the one who is saying something exists. You have to prove he exists. It's not my responsibility to prove to you that there aren't pink unicorns. You already don't believe in those. If I told you they existed it would be my responsibility to say why, not yours to say why not. Your brain is a tool for thinking, maybe give it a try
@Theboxer500 I guess you didn't read what I wrote, so I'll repeat it: It doesn't take faith to reject unsubstantiated claims about gods or anything else. I'll expand on that: It doesn't take faith to reject claims of the existence of leprechauns, invisible garden faeries, the Bogeyman, ghosts, centaurs, the Eater Bunny, anal-probing extraterrestrials, fauns, little green men on Mars, centaurs, mermaids, sirens, the Tooth Fairy, flying carpets, miracles, unicorns, flying horses...
Mr. Chief of leftbrainers Dawkins and some religious Catholic dude. Purely uselles conversation between the intelectual and the limited one except possibly for a good laugh. Argue leads to self-defeat and destruction of love and friendship between people. Hegelian dialectic in working. No brilliance in sight.
Dawkins has claimed, “As for religion … nobody wields a sharper bayonet than Sam Harris.” Harris debated Craig on 7th April. In his opening statement in that debate, Harris declared that Dr Craig is “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheists.” After that debate, the atheist website Debunking Christianity reported: “Bill (Craig) has once again showed himself as the best debater of this generation.” ROFL
There's something about Dr. Phil's phoney showman voice that just begs to say "yeeehaaaaww". I think he wants to say it. Anyone able to slip a few beers into him?
The truth of everything has been around for thousands of years. It is that there is a Maker of everything. Now I can prove there is such a Maker because the function of hydrogen working inside of us as ordained has a Maker and the Maker of the function of hydrogen is the Maker of all matter in the universe consisting primarily and initially of hydrogen. So there is One Maker of one set of working elements made to function in one set of life forms and there is no evidence of any other maker.
* 10 well hung Illuminati, Earning A Homeowner Federal Tax Exemption Status
PROPER PATRIOTIC PRESENTATION OF FLAG, FLORA & FAUNA ACT OF 2012
- Real Americans Display History of Patriotic Duty, Throughout Family Tree.
- Homes front porch window must provide visible access to:
1 American Flag, minimum of 6 Atheists hanging near the top, 2-3 Corrupt Elected Officials strung throughout middle and 6 Satanic Traitors of World Terrorist Bankers swinging from lower branches.
"Faith is defined to be belief... (not evidence) "
the bible defines faith as substance. its an actual thing. most if not all of religous ppl dont have faith. they believe 'just in case' and they dont believe that God is good but live in terror.
I got faith when I saw how evil I was and that I couldnt trust myself anymore. Then I was aware of God and his goodness and he said to me, 'Trust me and Ill save u from ur evil self.'
That was the day i finally was set free to enjoy God every day
@tontsa911 Dawkins would wipe the floor with him. UNLESS there was an audience of middle aged women to pander to by saying random shit that anyone can say that the core audience is likely to agree with thus getting a round of applause.
Dr Phil is a genius. Surprisingly shouting things like "Single moms are STRONG!" "Drug addictions HURT PEOPLE!" "Raise your children to be good people!" and "Support your children!" aren't exactly polarizing statements.
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
I'm a big fan of Richard Dawkins but I don't think this was one of his better efforts. The bottom line is that godists believe nonsense. We don't need to field arguments about our personalities, just bring them back to the central issue, why do they continue to believe the crap that was pumped into their brains when they were children?
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
Rather than wasting your time producing this trash, why not work for some charitable organisation. That might make you feel better. Sense of accomplishment etc.
This is absolutely HILARIOUS!!! I didn't know what to expect when I started watching it, but it didn't take long before I was laughing out loud. What an awesome video - very creative and with perfect timing. Thanks to whoever put this together - I'm sure a lot of work went into making this! I love the way the pictures were so carefully selected to match the quotes! Great job!!!
I have no respect whatsoever for "Dr Phil".. When will he have the next "psychic medium" on his show? Anyone who puts crap like that in his show has to be either a moron or a complete sell-out, that's why I never watch it anymore. : (
Human knowledge isn't necessarily humanoid knowledge. Eating fleas and swiving in trees is the simian waywardness that appeals to the pornocracy-loving, tattooed, rat-faced, Marxian grandchildren of the face-painting, acid-dropping, bare-footed flower children of 1968.
they should have used the one of doc phil say, "how about after this, we do a little coke'' that would have been great!
again, why so many dislikes? i pity the 723 people without a sense of humor; maybe this is why the world sucks lately.. very funny. the pictures were also funny.
seems legit
MirecxXx 7 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
R.Dawkins ist der Capitän Francesco Schettino des Wissenschaftsbetriebs, der das Schiff der exakten Naturwissenschaften in die Havarie der atheistischen Halbwissenschaften zusteuert. Mit seinem waghalsigen Manöver eines Hasardeurs wird er unzählige Passagiere der "Costa Scienza" in die unmoralische Vernunftlosigkeit kentern.
cybernautikon 11 hours ago
This was pretty funny. Idk why there's so many dislikes.
KuzcoCool96 1 day ago
Boxer do us all a favour and close youtube and go back to praying, guess we'd all be happy then
lockoshamface 1 day ago
hey y'all religious folk, if ye dont wipe us all out guess whats gonna happen in 100-200 years all our future generations are gonna sit around drinking beer and laughing at the crap you (and most of us at one stage) believed in , its safe to say you wont agree with this but it will happen, i prayed to the butter on me toast this morning and it gave me a sign...OOuuuuuuuuOOUuuuu
lockoshamface 1 day ago
@Theboxer500
Shouldn't you be busy being raped by your local preist? Troll.
TheAtheistNamedJacob 2 days ago
It's funny how you have to edit videos to get a terrible argument and bigoted mindset from an Atheist, but you can find the same thing in a religious person without even looking :)
maccas1329 3 days ago 2
Wow the person who made this must me a scumbag
EvanFilm 5 days ago
Only a REAL FOOL would claim there is no God! Man creates awesome skyscrapers, fake hearts, tunnels, vehicles etc.. If we are very imperfect then what more can God create THE UNIVERSE! You must accept Jesus Christ as your Savior to receive eternal rest in heaven! Simple! John 3:16 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him! Repent & accept Jesus Christ! Jesus Christ or HELL?!? Visit cbn. com
tigersforchrist 5 days ago
@tigersforchrist
you are free to believe in your own delusions in this world
TheWhitewolf15770 5 days ago
@TheWhitewolf15770 IF YOUR RIGHT AND I AM WRONG NOTHING HAPPENS!! IF I AM RIGHT AND YOUR WRONG DUMBASS YOU GO TO HELL! YOU NEED TO GET YOUR SHIT BIRD HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS WHICH HAS BEEN THERE FOREVER IT APPEARS! YOU NEED TO REPENT AND SEEK GOD THROUGH JESUS CHRIST BEFORE YOU GO TO YOUR PERMANENT HOME CALLED HELL WITH OUT UTTER DARKNESS AND FLAMES! HELL IS NEAR! REPENT JESUS IS WAITING DUMMY!
tigersforchrist 5 days ago
@tigersforchrist Good science is based on PROVABLE,TESTABLE truths, Religion just trys to force you to believe blindly without question and threatens you if you dont, You really need to see the youtube video richard dawkins what if your wrong which answers your question. Its obvious to me that your part of problem rather than the solution. I am not interested in the ancient writings of the mentally ill sorry
TheWhitewolf15770 4 days ago
@tigersforchrist That is the worse argument ever!! how do you know that hell is real?
nikshob 4 days ago
@tigersforchrist What you mean to say is only a real fool would believe in things without proof or evidence to support it
TheWhitewolf15770 4 days ago
Hahaha nice one :)
timmyfriday2718 1 week ago
This is funny stuff.
scrubbyfilth 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Your not saved by church, religion, good works Your saved by the grace of God through faith not of yourselves It is the gift of God not of works lest any man should boast. Freemason illuminatists are worshipers of lucifer a goat called the baphomet These satanists created atheists, mormons, jehovah witnesses, and many other false religions only to turn you away from the truth of the bible, to not believe in God because God is Love. They have done this so you give up your rights, New World Order
kjvtruth1 1 week ago
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THE UNIVERSE could not have been active eternally because of entropy (energy decay, even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 1 week ago
CREATIONISTS RIGHT ABOUT ENTROPY (Internet Article): Entropy occurs in both open and closed systems. In every transfer of energy some of the energy becomes useless. Given enough time, all of the energy becomes useless and the universe cannot be sustain any activity. Even in an open system, there must first exist an energy-converting, directing mechanism to develop order, such as when a seed becomes a tree. Spontaneous order from chaos is not possible, not to any significant degree.
Mogley52 1 week ago
@Mogley52
The first part is true, which is why cosmologists think the universe may eventually suffer from heat death. But entropy has to do with the transfer and conversion of energy. It has nothing to do with order, chaos, or complexity.
sypher113 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news concerning genetics, fossils, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit Institute for Creation Research.
Mogley52 1 week ago
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
Mogley52 1 week ago
@Mogley52
It's very common for people not versed in how science functions to see debate within a field and view it as subversive. In reality debate is integral to the process of uncovering truth. Debate and disagreement don't mean there is anything wrong, it's the very process by which science works and we actually learn.
sypher113 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select" traits, not produce them. If a trait survives, that survival is called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC AND BIOLOGICAL SIMILARITIES are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes in the various forms of life. Genetic information can't happen by chance, so this is the best explanation. So-called junk DNA is not junk. These "non-coding" segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression (how, when, and where genes are expressed in the body). Read my Internet article WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENCE SUPPORTING CREATION (Google this title to access the site). The site presents a collage of evidences from science supporting creation and refutes arguments by evolutionists (i.e. "flaws" in design of human eye, "junk" DNA, embryonic recapitulation, age of the earth, fossils, origin of life, etc.). Also, read my Internet article ANY LIFE ON MARS CAME FROM EARTH. In the Earth's past, powerful volcanic activity spewed life-containing dirt into space very possibly reaching Mars.
Mogley52 1 week ago
"Tell me your best quality" - "Bending over backwards" Now, THAT really made me crack up :-)
Keytaster 1 week ago
this is some nice sound bites you have here
ilikeboobies185 2 weeks ago
funny
tarkineWild 2 weeks ago
dawkins is weird
darkfur35 2 weeks ago
this is amazing lmao
glitteraddict44 2 weeks ago
you're a bitch! lmao
kkevin369 2 weeks ago
This is just stupid
Paladin62 2 weeks ago
Yes the timing could be improved but all in all I found that funny haha
Sean117Ply 2 weeks ago
hilarious!
massiveBallsX 3 weeks ago
Prof. Dawkins is an intellectual. Sorry, pet. But that's just a fact.
101truthhurts 3 weeks ago
He doesn't ACT like one. He's silly cunt. End of.
101truthhurts 3 weeks ago
"Every single thing you said is rubbish." "You're a bitch!"
hahaa best part!
0HSNAPxITSxMK 3 weeks ago
nice try with the edit mate,didn`t work!
cosmictywlite 3 weeks ago
Good job on concept and editing. I like the pic on 1:35 :)
worldwitness 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
R.Dawkins ist der Capitän Francesco Schettino des Wissenschaftsbetriebs, der das Schiff der exakten Naturwissenschaften in die Havarie der atheistischen Halbwissenschaften zusteuert. Mit seinem waghalsigen Manöver eines Hasardeurs wird er unzählige Passagiere der "Costa Scienza" in die unmoralische Vernunftlosigkeit kentern.
JesusChristusSoter 3 weeks ago
@JesusChristusSoter I agree.
Entropy56 1 day ago
Very funny. Good editing. Matching the voice levels would improve it.
oldgoody1 3 weeks ago
Dr. Dawkins: "I think it matters what's true, because the truth is beautiful, it's exciting, it's inspiring... There's almost nothing I could imagine more worthwhile spending your life doing than understanding the truth of why you have a life at all in the first place."
Dr. Phil: "Get over it, nobody really cares"
Dr. Dawkins: "Yes, it's very sad."
Lol xD
Kelban91 3 weeks ago
@TheJontyJones
Thumbs up, this is an example of when youtube can be so brilliant.
TheSolaris810 3 weeks ago
This is dumb.
hznfrst 3 weeks ago
I hate it when people say "Why do you have to be right?" It is literally an invitation to be wrong. They might as well say, "Can you please be wrong for a second?" And to that I answer, "No."
SandBarAndYou 3 weeks ago
atheism isnt a job, moron
rammsteinrulz16 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHY DO YOU PEOPLE HATE CHRISTIANS SO MUCH. YOU KNOW CHRISTIANS DONT HATE YOU RIGHT??
adamk4747 3 weeks ago
Obviously edited very carefully to project the desired result,fail.
robertmck12 3 weeks ago
lold go dawkins!
bluetyee 4 weeks ago
Lol VERY silly.
AntiHateAllianceAHA 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Richard Dawkins ist Francesco Schettino des Wissenschaftsbetriebs, der das Schiff der exakten Naturwissenschaften in die Havarie der atheistischen Halbwissenschaften zusteuert. Mit seinem waghalsigen Manöver eines Hasardeurs wird er die unzähligen Passanten der "Costa Scienza" in die unmoralische Vernunftlosigkeit kentern.
JesusChristusSoter 4 weeks ago
LOL "i was born in africa"
(maybe he is :P)
Ritsoz 1 month ago
@Ritsoz Dawkins was born in Kenya.
AntiHateAllianceAHA 4 weeks ago
@AntiHateAllianceAHA Like Obama was.
Entropy56 1 day ago
@Ritsoz he is
scriptycoder 4 weeks ago
This is funny why do people hate this?
MrSoliPat 1 month ago
@MrSoliPat because people expected a REAL debate.
Groeneroest 4 weeks ago
Very good editing. 1:15- priceless
GranthamStreet 1 month ago
"..we disappear completely" Shame... i think he does need dr phil
g3rd1 1 month ago
Ironically, this is probably the way the real interview would go. Phil (Who isn't a real doctor by the way) And Prof. Dawkins always having to deal with ignornant pricks.
101truthhurts 1 month ago
@101truthhurts
Dr. Phil is a doctor. When one earns a Doctorate degree, which Dr. Phil has (PhD), that person also earns the title of "Doctor". He may no longer have a private practice, but that does not take away his degree and title as Doctor.
0HSNAPxITSxMK 3 weeks ago
This vid is funny..
cosmicforums 1 month ago
why so many dislikes? I thought it was hilarious.
RoberMatts 1 month ago
@RoberMatts Atheists can't take the heat. At the end of the day they are the sour losers and will never admit that they are wrong, even when they are proven wrong. The arrogance is mind boggling and scary.
Theboxer500 1 month ago
@Theboxer500 what a troll...
1messiahcomplex 1 month ago
@1messiahcomplex lol funny cause i wasn't trolling at all
Theboxer500 1 month ago
@Theboxer500 Wait, ATHEISTS are wrong?!?!?!
SteelerEagleFan 2 days ago
@SteelerEagleFan of course dude. Atheism is nothing but another faith. I have always asked them if they can disprove god and they never reply or some of them just say something stupid. If they have no proof why god doesn't exist and they still believe it, that would be considered a faith. It doesn't take a genius to figure that one out, faith is believe in something with a lack of evidence.
Theboxer500 2 days ago
@Theboxer500 How are you supposed to disprove something that hasn't even been proved?
ancalites 2 days ago
@Theboxer500
God can't be disproved because god is an unfalsifiable hypothesis. No matter how much rationality and proof I can give towards the impossibility of a god, you could always say god is greater than rationality and proof. Also, Atheism is the rejection of any false deity - whether it be Zues or Thor or the christian god, for example. Also, you said "If they have no proof why god doesn't exist and they still believe it...". If they believe in god, they're not Atheists.
SteelerEagleFan 2 days ago
@Theboxer500
Obviously the people you mistook for Atheists weren't very smart. Message me if you want to know the true stance of a relatively intelligent Atheist, or if you just want to debate the reality vs non-reality of a god.
SteelerEagleFan 2 days ago
@Theboxer500 Atheists don't have to disprove the existence of gods. Theists claim a god or gods exist, so it's up to them to provide the evidence. Atheism does not rely on faith. It doesn't take faith to reject unsubstantiated claims about gods or anything else.
YY4Me133 1 day ago
@YY4Me133 look the theists have spoken spoken... we believe in god and have faith, and atheists are always trying to prove us wrong and fail to disprove god. Atheism is a blind faith with no evidence to back it's claim up. BTW believing in something without evidence is called faith and thats what atheism is. You believe there is no god yet you have no proof.
Theboxer500 1 day ago
@Theboxer500 You can't disprove a negative. So to ask such a thing is ignorant and impossible and honestly doesn't even make any sense. The burden of proof is with the one who is saying something exists. You have to prove he exists. It's not my responsibility to prove to you that there aren't pink unicorns. You already don't believe in those. If I told you they existed it would be my responsibility to say why, not yours to say why not. Your brain is a tool for thinking, maybe give it a try
CamBlack92 1 day ago
@Theboxer500 I guess you didn't read what I wrote, so I'll repeat it: It doesn't take faith to reject unsubstantiated claims about gods or anything else. I'll expand on that: It doesn't take faith to reject claims of the existence of leprechauns, invisible garden faeries, the Bogeyman, ghosts, centaurs, the Eater Bunny, anal-probing extraterrestrials, fauns, little green men on Mars, centaurs, mermaids, sirens, the Tooth Fairy, flying carpets, miracles, unicorns, flying horses...
YY4Me133 1 day ago
Blam this piece of crap...
desrosiersfelix 1 month ago
Your a fucking retard
LynchAdam 1 month ago
i find richard dawkin's ideas on biology WAY more interesting than his atheism. i'm an atheist btw.
seriously, read 'the selfish gene' and actually learn something new.
YeTenuousUmbrae 1 month ago
This is a ridiculous waste of time.
kougermasterz 1 month ago
LOL..good job making this one!
mag1093 1 month ago
Mr. Chief of leftbrainers Dawkins and some religious Catholic dude. Purely uselles conversation between the intelectual and the limited one except possibly for a good laugh. Argue leads to self-defeat and destruction of love and friendship between people. Hegelian dialectic in working. No brilliance in sight.
6S6l6a6v6a 1 month ago
People shouldn't downvote this just because they were expecting a real Dawkins vs. Dr. Phil debate.
Arfalarf 1 month ago
This was a funny video.
TRUMPHENT 1 month ago
@TRUMPHENT Are you fucking kidding me?
Are you fucking kidding me.....
Fuck off.
AtomicDonut22 1 month ago
"Cathy?"
"Please call me Richard"
"Cathy, are you there"
lmao Who thought a mashup could be this funny?
LordShivasServant 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dawkins has claimed, “As for religion … nobody wields a sharper bayonet than Sam Harris.” Harris debated Craig on 7th April. In his opening statement in that debate, Harris declared that Dr Craig is “the one Christian apologist who seems to have put the fear of God into many of my fellow atheists.” After that debate, the atheist website Debunking Christianity reported: “Bill (Craig) has once again showed himself as the best debater of this generation.” ROFL
RosesOfTimes 1 month ago
That was very well done and a reasonably accurate view of the two characters.
epicdeed 1 month ago
lol rather humorous. nice editing.
Blake4014 1 month ago
LMAO
MeepullStewray 1 month ago
I actually thought this was real at first o_0
TheMaccdog 1 month ago
that was pretty funny. im surprised theres so many dislikes.
darthpaul123 1 month ago
"The reason Hitler did the things he did is because he was a Roman Catholic"
Did Dawkin's actually say that? He is full of crap.
So is Dr. Phil, I suppose, but whatever.
URProductions 1 month ago
@URProductions
I think Dawkins said that in response to when people say "The reason Stalin did the things he did is because he was an atheist."
He was pointing how ridiculous it was to simply link someone's religious beliefs as the only motivation for people's behavior.
cartesiandualism 1 month ago
@cartesiandualism Ok ok. Tit for tat.
URProductions 1 month ago
Phil "Tell me your best quality?"
Dawkins "Bending over backwards"
P "Tell me how you feel about that?"
D "Well I can't prognosticate how I'll feel, maybe I'll be senile and GAGA!"
Why does this not get more thumbs up! It is genius!
jasmac04 1 month ago
There's something about Dr. Phil's phoney showman voice that just begs to say "yeeehaaaaww". I think he wants to say it. Anyone able to slip a few beers into him?
OftenMisled 1 month ago
Hahaha Dawkins "Fuck off." Love it! :)
Pattyforfreedom 1 month ago
Dr Phil: I don't know anything!
Richard dawkins: Im sure that's true.
lol
3xAmigosProductions 1 month ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
The truth of everything has been around for thousands of years. It is that there is a Maker of everything. Now I can prove there is such a Maker because the function of hydrogen working inside of us as ordained has a Maker and the Maker of the function of hydrogen is the Maker of all matter in the universe consisting primarily and initially of hydrogen. So there is One Maker of one set of working elements made to function in one set of life forms and there is no evidence of any other maker.
JungleJargon 1 month ago
funny shit haaaaaaaa
nigelhoary 1 month ago
thought it was retarded, but well done. I laughed at Dr. Dawkins´ response to the pot smoking 3:30 - 3.45 that was epic.
"Those who believe absurdities will commit atrocities", Voltaire ;)
MartinGilmour 1 month ago 2
I'm an atheist and I was not insulted. I think it's hilarious, and it makes fun of both of them.
nmckelvie1 1 month ago
LMAO at all the atheists that were offended
raulsnchez 1 month ago
LMAO
Swe3ets 1 month ago
This was created in 6 hours.....and it was good.
dewpoint88 1 month ago
I cracked a smile, but then I realised it was gas.
difficultbastard 1 month ago 22
Lol Atheists can't take a joke.
RayKalmNiam 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
* 10 well hung Illuminati, Earning A Homeowner Federal Tax Exemption Status
PROPER PATRIOTIC PRESENTATION OF FLAG, FLORA & FAUNA ACT OF 2012
- Real Americans Display History of Patriotic Duty, Throughout Family Tree.
- Homes front porch window must provide visible access to:
1 American Flag, minimum of 6 Atheists hanging near the top, 2-3 Corrupt Elected Officials strung throughout middle and 6 Satanic Traitors of World Terrorist Bankers swinging from lower branches.
waketheoblivious 1 month ago
Good job putting this together, amusing stuff!
wptte 1 month ago
"DON'T YOU THINK THERE'S SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT PATRONISING ABOUT THE WAY YOU PUT THAT?!"
"Maybe..."
lulz
Parabol0086 2 months ago
Thats a load of crap
Fuck off
Huddiethegreat 2 months ago
While I did chuckle slightly a few times I think Dawkins would make dr. Phil look like a complete moron in a real debate
TwelfthHunter 2 months ago
ah at least it's better than any show Phil's on.
zillion167 2 months ago
"Faith is defined to be belief... (not evidence) "
the bible defines faith as substance. its an actual thing. most if not all of religous ppl dont have faith. they believe 'just in case' and they dont believe that God is good but live in terror.
I got faith when I saw how evil I was and that I couldnt trust myself anymore. Then I was aware of God and his goodness and he said to me, 'Trust me and Ill save u from ur evil self.'
That was the day i finally was set free to enjoy God every day
j919or 2 months ago
I'd like to see real debate between them. I don't like Dr. Phil much and I adore Dawkins.
tontsa911 2 months ago
@tontsa911 Dawkins would wipe the floor with him. UNLESS there was an audience of middle aged women to pander to by saying random shit that anyone can say that the core audience is likely to agree with thus getting a round of applause.
Antifaith29 2 months ago 67
@Antifaith29 Agreed :)
tontsa911 2 months ago
@Antifaith29 Exactly.
Dr Phil is a genius. Surprisingly shouting things like "Single moms are STRONG!" "Drug addictions HURT PEOPLE!" "Raise your children to be good people!" and "Support your children!" aren't exactly polarizing statements.
cyberslick18 4 weeks ago
lol
mQtek 2 months ago
haha 1:15 "How did u know that"
sexyxrs 2 months ago
HAHA! This is awesome. Kudos!
kcdummy 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 2 months ago
I'm a big fan of Richard Dawkins but I don't think this was one of his better efforts. The bottom line is that godists believe nonsense. We don't need to field arguments about our personalities, just bring them back to the central issue, why do they continue to believe the crap that was pumped into their brains when they were children?
AtheistwithAttitude 2 months ago
@AtheistwithAttitude ??
cullurzful 1 month ago
This didn't make any sense. I rofl'd the whole time xD
TheoryOfThought 2 months ago
Jesus, what idiot put this stupid shit together.
enHanzable 2 months ago
ROFL "I DONT KNOW ANYTHING!!!"
TheSp0rki 2 months ago
@JezusSlave
HERPDERPJESUSRAPTURE
SHUDDUP!!!!!
TheSmaych 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
JESUS CHRIST, HIS CATHOLIC-UNIVERSAL-APOSTOLIC CHURCH, SACRAMENTS, THE BIBLE, MIRACLES, HEALINGS, ST. MARY APPARITIONS, MESSAGES FROM HEAVEN, SIGNS IN 2011 ARE NOT A MYTHOLOGY BUT THE REALITY !!!
GET READY FOR THE GREAT WARNING NOW!!!
thewarningsecondcoming . com
JezusSlave 2 months ago
The BBC's Monty Python crew have a damn-lot to answer for peeps...
They've often held the New World Order agenda back for decades...
It's hard to take fascists seriously when they're percieved as funny...
spacelizardlaw 2 months ago
holy shit this is awesome, it probably took you longer than Dr. Feel was even on the air
RilloRacer 2 months ago
I'm an atheist and I think this is pretty funny!
summerlytriangle 2 months ago
Love it when Richard drops the F-bomb!!!
babywarthog 2 months ago
Dr. Phil is a piece of shit.
andmaketherain 2 months ago
Rather than wasting your time producing this trash, why not work for some charitable organisation. That might make you feel better. Sense of accomplishment etc.
fish8491 2 months ago
This was funny. All of the dislikes are rather puzzling.
novaphoenix70 2 months ago
Lol, I was about the click away when I realised it was fake, but glad I didn't cos damn that was funny!
IIproductionsII 2 months ago
This is absolutely HILARIOUS!!! I didn't know what to expect when I started watching it, but it didn't take long before I was laughing out loud. What an awesome video - very creative and with perfect timing. Thanks to whoever put this together - I'm sure a lot of work went into making this! I love the way the pictures were so carefully selected to match the quotes! Great job!!!
Xoletta 2 months ago
I have no respect whatsoever for "Dr Phil".. When will he have the next "psychic medium" on his show? Anyone who puts crap like that in his show has to be either a moron or a complete sell-out, that's why I never watch it anymore. : (
winterstellar 2 months ago
fuck dr phil
takerhbkfan 2 months ago
@takerhbkfan My thought exactly.
Spaghettimonster777 2 months ago
why do people bother makin this stuff? it's lame
djkhaless 2 months ago
@djkhaless No. You're lame. This is hilarious. But if you aren't familiar with Richard Dawkins, you're not going to 'get it'.
Xoletta 2 months ago
@Xoletta Quite familiar with Dawkins, this video is just not good...lol. It's an opinion, people are aloud to have them.
djkhaless 2 months ago
@IconsofTeleplay Douchey thing to say. Im an atheist and i dont look down on religous types.
hookitonup 2 months ago
lol, so funny!
Meradana 2 months ago
lulz
whydid666 2 months ago
Hehe nice editing
forgottenmemories63 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Human knowledge isn't necessarily humanoid knowledge. Eating fleas and swiving in trees is the simian waywardness that appeals to the pornocracy-loving, tattooed, rat-faced, Marxian grandchildren of the face-painting, acid-dropping, bare-footed flower children of 1968.
IconsOfTeleplay 2 months ago
You're fucking shit, you shit fucking cunt.
emphaticapathy 2 months ago
they should have used the one of doc phil say, "how about after this, we do a little coke'' that would have been great!
again, why so many dislikes? i pity the 723 people without a sense of humor; maybe this is why the world sucks lately.. very funny. the pictures were also funny.
justTOASTjr 2 months ago
CLEVERBOT!!!!!!!!!
alecton 2 months ago
Classic! This is hilarious
Strikethematch1 2 months ago
let me ask you something...do you judge the rest of us, the non-beautiful people? XD
smokypaloma 2 months ago
Lol, why so many dislikes?
That was quite funny!
aMondia 3 months ago 31
@aMondia Because people thought it was a real conversation.
krissmith1986 2 months ago
@aMondia
I liked it 2. Moreover the guy/gal deserves a lot of credit just for the effort of putting this together. Good job!
nimatoike 2 months ago
@aMondia Bad Title
FriendLondonFriend 1 month ago
@aMondia
False pretences.
Loupland 1 month ago
am I the only one who thought this was real until I was like 4 minutes in.....
manwithouthat44 3 months ago