Water Vapor clip From "Global Warming or Global Governance"

[wrjamescom]

Once you account for greenhouse charactics as wel as volume, the CO2 added by mad to the atmosphere, EVEN IF you believe the inflated data from Al Gore's magic CO2 religion, amounts to only 0.12%of the earth's total greenhouse gasses. And if you then factor in the water's regulation of earth's reflectivity, the water's transportation of energy from the surface, etc. the effect of ALL of the CO2, including the natural volume, becomes totally meaningless.

[markcmahand]

Many scientists are saying that we are on the brink of a new ice-age. It is a fact that the "warming" trend ended in the late 90's. Most non-political scientists point toward the sun's output as being the major player in any temperature trend.

[stephenkriz]

This video is a bunch of nonsense. Water vapor precipitates out of the atmosphere in a matter of days or weeks. CO2, on the other hand, takes years - decades, really - to get out of the atmosphere. CO2 also is a prime factor in "radiative forcing", which is what drives up mean temperatures. Water vapor does not. This is just unscientific right-wing propaganda to downplay what is going to become a grave threat to human existence. It is utter garbage.

[wavelength121]

@stephenkriz The sad thing is, these people think they can just make up their own facts to scare people into following the status quo. CO2 is harmless ladies and gentlemen, go back to buying plastics that will never biodegrade and driving around your gas-guzzlers to the lake for the weekend so your spoiled dipshit kids can drive jetskis around and continue to ruin the environment. But no, Obama is the bad guy! Go back to sleep America.

[dagrimreeefah]

@wavelength121 Sounds like you're over-generalizing everyone else (your peers) just to keep your delusional, ass-kissing image of your corporate shill leader (Obama, wait, I'm sorry, Barry the non US citizen Saetoro) intact. Common defensive tactic for a mainstream media-fed, non-self respecting, spineless boot licking cretin like you. Sounds like you're the one that needs to wake up from your sleep, you pathetic socialist supporting coward piece of shit. Freedom will prevail.

[wavelength121]

@dagrimreeefah ::tosses keys::

Park it. And here's a buck for a Snickers.

[dagrimreeefah]

@wavelength121 "these people think they can just make up their own facts to scare people into following the status quo"

What do you think the whole "climate change" (formerly "global warming") scare is? Man, you're a fucking idiot if you couldn't see the irony in your asinine statement. Go back to never doing your own research and listening to what your unelected leaders (Obama, Al Gore) say with no critical thinking, just so you can take the lazy path to fitting in with the "status quo".

[wavelength121]

@dagrimreeefah Scare? Climate Change was a proven phenomenon long before Al Gore or Obama were even born. I did my own research back in grade school. Where do you get your data? No, the internet is not a source. Neither is Fox News or whatever other right-wing talking-head lobbyist riled you up like a good little sheep. Go back to what you're good at, Eating and Spending, like a good little capitalist. Let the real men fix the country and save the environment. We've been doing fine without you.

[dagrimreeefah]

@stephenkriz What is utter garbage is the fact that you call this "right wing propaganda". Hahaha you're so fucking stupid it hurts. What do you think AGW is? Propaganda folks. Remember the "global cooling" scare in the 70's? Remember the ozone layer scare in the 90's? Besides that, have you forgot about those massive oceans out there, the same oceans that intake MASSIVE amounts of CO2 everyday? Hahaha fucking stupid ass kids these days, never doing their own research and just blindly following

[dagrimreeefah]

@stephenkriz It's also interesting to note that more than a million years ago, global CO2 levels were 12 times higher than they are today, and it was COOLER. It's just pathetic that you think informative videos like this that are trying to STAVE OFF GLOBAL TAXES is propaganda, but the same garbage science that has been hand fed to you by celebrities and unelected officials to PUSH A GLOBAL TAX is not propaganda. You, sir, are a fucking witless pawn.

[dagrimreeefah]

@stephenkriz Using junk terms like "radiative forcing" (a term coined by the IPCC, a UN panel of socialists, not scientists, with a political agenda to impose a global tax) doesn't prove anything, except how fucking clueless you are, how much of a band wagon-riding tool you are, and how you need to put the wikipedia down and actually open a real, independent, climate science book. BTW, approx. 2,000 of the ~2,200 climate scientists who worked for the IPCC denounce AGW, you pathetic sheep.

[AlanWattParrot]

i think it might be higher but if so only by 2% tops....it's like estimating the % amount of dark matter...lots of variables differently calculated

[cdimmm]

Military chemtrail/HAARP operations are causing the climate problems

[woodbrake]

It's not true! Every climatic variation is due to increased CO2 content. And every climatic variation is BAD! Blah Blah Blah ...

[ThePukkaman]

Politicians have a vested interest in using the climate change agenda to increase taxation on peoples lives and businesses. My advise to anyone here who disagrees with Dr M Coffman should YouTube Search: The Greatest Global Warming  Swindle

[tubeshok]

Despite the fact that water vapor causes the overwhelming amount of greenhouse gas, the EPA failed to list it as a greenhouse gas in its ‘Endangerment Finding’, most likely because people would then understand that water, like carbon, is harmless and would reject the idea that CO2 is a threat to public health and welfare.

[tubeshok]

The objective of controlling greenhouse gases is to implement political policies, like the EPA’s 18,000 page document with carbon reduction codes that also include a Cap-and-Trade scheme. 

[Deathswalk]

1 person thinks this video is a lie

[wingnut4427]

@Deathswalk 1 prson is a dip shit too ! lol

[Greensparrow101]

@Deathswalk Probably a UN IPCC climate scientist is my guess.

[cyclesingsleep]

p.s. I also know that the sun's increase in activity will create a far greater change in weather than we could ever effect. And, I know that we are not 'creating CO2' but simply releasing back into the atmosphere what was once in the atmosphere during the time of the dinosaurs, which was then inhaled by plants, then crushed under the earth for millions of years...coal/oil to fuel...yadda, yadda still, what could be the effect of a 1% change from the normal range of possibilities? Thanks : )

[cyclesingsleep]

I know that Al Gore and the banksters scammed all of their figures. So, I get that. However, your presentation does cause me to ask a question for which I do not have enough information to formulate an answer. If I understand you correctly, you are saying that man made green house gases could compromise 1% of the possible variability different from the huge amount of natural variability. However, is a 1% abnormal increase enough to cause significant changes beyond the normal? Thanks : )

[Johnalexgray]

When I was a kid I learned that earth warms up and cools down by itself. Al gore couldn't fool me even if i was still 8 years old.