the problem with time travel if every one had the abilty to it time would change every second one minute the nazis won ww2 the next they loset but japan destroyed the usa
Really I just can't believe this stuff. Just because a certain kind of particle moves at a certain speed does not necessarily mean it determines time. Maybe someone else's perception of what is happening, but not actual time.
what would be the speed if 2 lights one behind bertrand and one light shining from the front would they still uphold to einsteins law concerning the speed of light if bertrand is moving towards the light in front at close to the speed of light which light would hitting him would be fastest? the one in front or the back? or is there an explanation
@74bluewolf I know that except maybe the point of reference from the moving object would allow the light in front to reach him first since time is not absolute but it is subject to a moving object. Is about a friend of mine he doesnt get this concept and argues that the light should reach him at the same time in which I completely disagree.
@notreallythatawesome yes traveling at the speed of light wouldn't get us far anyway. Alcubierre drive is the current best idea for space travel, and it removes the problem of time dilation.
so essentially, our making it to the closest solar system to ours is possible. Although it would be a 1000 years in the future before we made it there. By the time an astronaut made it there, his family back home would be dead, his grandkids would also have died, so I'm guessing no one would volunteer for a mission like that.
@notreallythatawesome exactly. BUT. What is great though is the fact that this is the only way we CAN visit the stars. Because, for the astronaut on board, he doesn't notice the difference. If time didn't slow down for him, he could only make it like 80 light years away instead of millions of light years away. Maybe in the distant future when people live longer, the ship that is traveling can be like a communal living system, and can carry many many people and equipment.
@AroundSun Yeah, I was thinking about that. I wonder if we could effectively reproduce earth's environment in a way that satisfied everyone on board. But, making a journey like that would be very risky, because over millions of light years away, The whole human race could be extinct by the time the pilots or whoever got back. I'm guessing, even if we had the capability, we wouldn't make such a journey unless it was absolutely neccesary. like before our sun goes red giant.
@notreallythatawesome It isn't millions of light years for those who are on board whatever craft is moving at 80% or more of the speed of light. Only to us earth people
@AroundSun Yeah, so if in the millions of years they're gone, when they come back, the earth could've gone into an ice age or something. We also could have stopped believing they'd return and not be prepared at all for their arrival. We, back at home, could descend into a second Dark Ages and mostly die out...
@notreallythatawesome This is all true. There is no guarantee. But by the time we are traveling near light speed visiting galaxies, humans will have spread out to other planets and solar systems, maybe to other galaxies. So earth may just be the cradle of civilization of history. Where it all started. But not the only planet harboring life. Then again, there are wormholes. Maybe we could use them to go millions of light years away and come home in five minutes. That'd be nice.
@manoharbabu1 That only proves me right. Time travel is defined as something experiencing time at a different rate compared to us. Anything moving at a different velocity compared to us will experience time at a different rate. Your example is also invalid as according to the formula for time dilation, to extend your life span by 30 times, you would need to move at 99.9994% the speed of light. Traveling at 99% only increases it by 12 times. You failed to prove me wrong AND cited wrong evidence.
@manoharbabu1 Since when did I say that it was practical? I never mentioned it. You didn't state it in your original reply either. The theory of general relativity can and has been proven to work as per equations. If you can't comprehend what I am saying, please do not try to prove me wrong. If you were trying to ask a question, please phrase it like one and I will be glad to help you with your queries.
@leto85 if everything in your body slows down by the same amount that is not a problem. Your pulse is not slowing down compared with the chemistry inside your cells.
But if your heartbeat also slows down and you still goes faster, wouldn't this just kill you? That way you could travel through time, but not surviving it, unfortuniatly.
First of all my last reply to you....as i cannot use such language that you use!
Secondly, i didn't make fun of Einstein's theory.....i just called it a "theory" ... and if you think it is making fun, than what could be more childish than that. It is really A theory!
Too bad you have to be going close to light speed for this "time travel" effect to be apparent, and we're so far away from light speed spacecraft it's not even funny.
wait, but don't people age? so it doesn't matter if time seem slow around them, their organs run on their own time: the time of life and death. so after 100 years, it'll start shutting down (if not already shutted down), right? just trying to tie biology into this.
@sniperdude5236 - He mentioned that everything, your heart rate, brainwaves and everything will slow down....... So maybe the lifespan of the cells of your organs also increases..... or rather..... since the time is slower, your cells take longer to die..... So your organs dont shut down..... they too have lived only through an hour.......
What ever you may say, at least I dont abuse . Why , coz I dont have to prove any thing by shouting or abusing. All knowledge & everything & every one (u & me) belongs to The God Almighty Allah :-)
This is the Belief of the Muslims how Prophet Muhammad ascended to Sky / Havens , 1450 years before we knew this theory of Sir Albert Eisenstein, on a Horse Burraq (The Lightning Speed) from Jerusalem (Where now is The Dom of rock) ALLAH KNOWS BETTER. Subhan Allah.
light travels 670,000,000 mph. lets say light is racing against a spaceship that travels 669,999,999 mph. that means the spaceship would be traveling 1 mph less than light. would the light overtaking the spaceship look the same?
@greatman6655 the more you approach the speed of light, the more your mass is close to infinite, so it would take infinite energy for that to happen. So in theory, nothing can travel at the speed of light except photons (light) because photons have zero mass. But to get back to your question, let me give you an example: If you are in a car, you turn you flashlight on, for someone outside (NOT moving), he/she will perceive the light at the same speed, not 300000 km/h + car speed. happy to help!
@greatman6655 If you are in the spaceship, the light will overtake you at the speed of light. If you are outside the spaceship, you will see the light overtake the spaceship at 1mph
Can't believe that most ppl here judging from the comment still don't understand it. The light is only traveling diagonally for a observer. For the spaceships if they are moving at the same speed at direction to them they are pretty much at rest compared to each other, meaning that the photon is traveling only up and down. The explanation of why light travels at the same speed but different distances is because time is different for the third party observer then the spaceships.
I understand that the person traveling would be in a relative future compared to the person that stood still. But in order for this to be a form of time travel that is functional, wouldn't the person who has traveled have to return or be caught by the persons left in the past and in doing so reverse the effect that had been created. Or does the same effect happen on the reverse trip to the start causing even more time to lapse?
@marcos13af Now, to us, time is measured by clocks. So the experiment which proves that time is relative to speed is this: bounce a photon between two perfectly reflective, perfectly flat surfaces a constant distance appart and measure the time (t) it takes between hits when the apparatus is at rest. Now move the apparatus at a constant speed of v m/s. Notice that as v tends towards the speed of light (C), t tends towards 0. Hence, time slows down at high speeds.
@iMarc89 A stationary photon clock bounces photons between two mirrors at a fixed distance - and time is measured. Now, if the mirrors are moving, the photon can't simply bounce up/down because the mirrors will move away (photon can't go faster than light to keep up AND bounce at same rate)
For the photon clock to work at speed, the photon would need to be directed at an angle to hit the next position of the moving mirror. ie No longer measuring only the fixed distance between the mirrors.
@marcos13af No, I'm not. You see, the point of this is that the speed of rotation of the earth is static. So the closer you are to the centre, the faster you appear to be going, see? This debunks your spinning string around your finger experiment.
I guess everything is conditioned by gravity. Light travels slower near a bigger object than in total vacuum and taking light as an example of matter, maybe everything starts to move faster in relation to one another, when gravity increases, so that makes objects gravitational locked in an hierarchy.
@marcos13af Why can time not change? Because you decided it can't? Only last year an experiment was carried out with atomic clocks which showed that even with the slight change in relative speed observed in the earth's rotation from sea level to 1 meter above sea level, time slows at the higher altitude. Deal with it.
Take a piece of string and tie a nut at one end and twist the other side around your finger...you'll notice that how shorter the string becomes,much faster it will spin around your finger...Conclusion: Changing the Space(distance) you will Change Speed...
3:06 you're not changing time,but just the distance the beam of light needs to travel to reach the other mirror...
@marcos13af I agree - It seems obvious that distance changes, not time itself.
The photon would need to move diagonally to keep up with the moving mirrors, so it's no longer measuring a fixed distance (between the mirrors only). If you could go forward at the speed of light, the photon clock would simply stop because the photon could only be moving exactly forward simply to keep up - I still don't see how that would mean that time itself has *actually* stopped.
They believe that,because they think the speed of light is constant the time must change...in this video.Imagine,the shortest way between two points is a straight line! If the light source is moving forward,the light needs to travel a bigger distance,and since the light can NOT travel faster than it's own limit,they "THINK",time must change...The Einstein's theory is not being applied correctly in this case...and the theory itself has a lot of roles,that need to be fixed.
Remember guys no matter what, you cannot change the past no matter what. So if people did time travel then that would mean that they can not be allowed to harm anything according to phisics because science says that if it already happened then it cant be undone. Do u know hwere im headed guys. Think hard and soon u will know who the time travelers really are.
I think we only way we can time travel is to stop the cell aging process, we must have an internal reference clocks that our body has as from medical conditions where people age due to various conditions like Progeria, if the process of aging slowed to due to speed such that the body could not assert time then the cells may be frozen in time. I get sick of this travel at the speed of light, WE'VE CRASH so it's not possible so Einstein theory would never ever work in even theory.
well there is a problem with this and it is highlight by this example I 'll make up lets say another person takes 10 hours to fly half way around the world. I travel to the same place at the speed of light. Now since I spent 10 hours at home watching youtube videos and got there at the same time at the last moment , I have time travelled, however nothing as changed except my location and timezone. If set off 10 hours before him and get there I will have to wait 10 hours for him to arrive.
i got the idea of this theory...but i dont think, we can surpass time and go ahead of it, unto the hundreds or thousands of years in the future..for if so, then somebody should have came to our time today from the future, or from the past and claim that they been from the future or from the past.
Isn't that the dude that claims he went forward in time? Anyway, That's not how it works. it's like moving an hour glass, you don't manipulate time, you're manipulating the hourglass' time to get the sand to the bottom.
WE were taught the equation at school, it means that energy is constant and equal to product of mass and 2nd power of speed of light. which means that accelerating makes you travel faster through time and acceleration consumes increasing amounts of energy for decreasing efficiency and thus makes acceleration to LS impossible because there is no way to use all energy in universe.
So according to this, one travels forward in time if they are moving fast?? Would this not mean that people who stay in space stations (traveling 17,500mph) for a long period of time would be aging less quickly/going forward in time?
So if light travels approx. 186,282 miles per second, then if you were going 99.999% light speed it would still be going 186,282 miles per second relative to you. So if you were going 100% the speed of light, in a vehicle that isn't light, Would light still pass you at a rate of 186,282 miles per hour? and if so what would happen to time? would it go forward, backward, or be damaged destryoyed or disrupted?
@iMikeMiller I know it's not possible unless an object has zero mass and infinite propultion, But I'm wondering what the theory is as to what would happen if an object that isnt made of light were to go the speed, that as far as we know, only light can travel at.
Amazing how in centuries of evolution, fire, weapons, mechanics etc. All we are interested is in the SIMPLEST thing. Light. I think in the future people might say that Light is 'God'.... feh... science with religion dont mix well.
The photon clock is a pretty good device on visualising the time dilation effect. It's as good as it gets trying to display the 4th dimension in the 3D world.
It shows for the holder's frame of reference, the clock ticks slower when it's moving. That's about all the clock is about.
That's It. I took my comment out. Some people can't tell the difference between a joke and a real question.
BTW, This theory is invalid. Imagine you shoot two laser, one behind you, and one forward, while you travel near the speed of light, would your time slow down to accomodate the laser going forward, or speed up to accomodate the one going the opposite way? It cannot do both, proving the invalidity of that theory.
You must be a real genius. Why don't you publish some paper? Might be the next noble prize coming.
The answer to your question is called the inertial frame of reference. For yourself, both beams are going at full speed of light away from you. For an observer on Earth, you're traveling at ~c, both light beams going at full speed of light, relative to the observer. c is absolute.
The photon clock tries to visualise time to help you understand how things are, but don't rely on it.
this experiment is impossible, reaching the speed of light is impossible according to all theories, and the light clock should move 2x faster than the speed of light for the experiment to work, I mean to see the delay, if we know that speed of light doesn't change no matter how fast we move and in what direction.
@b3dr1z3q1r1 The speed of light has to change for this theory to be correct. Speed is distance over time, So if an object is going 99% the speed of light according to this theory light would still pass the object at 186,282 miles per second, therefore time must be the factor that is changing, making the light go faster by decreasing the time it takes to travel. To increase speed you must either increase the distance in an amount of time or as in this case, decrease the time for a given distance.
This is a theory not fact, Time is not medium that we can pick a point and travel to, we made units of time, Seconds minutes hours and so on, the french invented a metric clock, NO BODY EVER WILL CREATE A TIME TRAVEL MACHINE BECAUSE NO ONE FROM THE FUTURE HAS CAME BACK, our mushy bodies could not cope with a quarter of the speed of light, only in a vacuum would these speeds be possible because of air resistance, way to many factors IMHO
@Pyp28 Quote: "NO BODY EVER WILL CREATE A TIME TRAVEL MACHINE BECAUSE NO ONE FROM THE FUTURE HAS CAME BACK", that's false, you can't travel back before the time machine is made. So it's possible that a time machine has been made in the future but they can't go back in time before the time machine was there.
Quote: "only in a vacuum would these speeds be possible because of air resistance" no, it's plain impossible. You can't even accelerate a proton to the speed of light.
Words written before Einstein was born... let me know your thoughts as to why "lesser light" / "longer time" is considered "above" or "greater". See Book of Abraham scriptures: lds.org/scriptures/pgp/abr/3.15?lang=eng#7
Oh just to be clear the device on the moving ship is a photon that moves at the speed of light if you were on the same ship looking at it. Basically it is a device that measures the speed of light?
This video is so well done I can actually understand it fully. It's simple but Effective. I can now explain the theory to people and appear to be smarter than I am. Lol
You don't actually slow down at all, you only seem to from the point of view of an observer. Motion is relative - you would see the observer moving at close to the speed of light and having a slowed down heartbeat. To you, the observer is moving. To the observer, you are moving.
But since relativity states that neither party is wrong in their observation, then you "are" in fact, slowing down. This is more than just academic, it is true physically and is why astronaught's watches (that were synced with atomic clocks on earth) are a few seconds behind when they arrive home from long durations in space.
Yes your heart slows down but you won't see change in it.
Only people that are not moving at the speed of light or slower than you would be able to tell.
Easy example let's say u have 2 stop watches u set them both on at the same time.
You take one with you on the ship n travel at the speed of light for an hour. When you stop ur stop watch will say 1 hour the one you left it be a different time.
a second is a second? a proton moving from a designated point to point (second in distance) i can understand, well if you are travelling at the speed of light it is going to take longer because of the distance which i can also understand. This doesnt change the fact a second is a second long? if you are travelling at the speed of light a second passes regardless of how long it takes the proton to reach each point, can anybody clear this up for me? am i missing something?
What you are missing is that what we call a "second" is based on the vibrations of a caesium 133 atom. And, as the video says, if you take that atom along for the ride, it's frequency vibrations will slow down. To an outside observer this well be seen as time slowing down but to you (riding along with the atom), nothing will appear to be any different.
Your problem understanding this is thinking that the amount of time that goes by in a second is finite and unalterable.
What I don't really understand is how travelling at that speed would slow down a human for example. Would it slow down our heartbeat and therefor slow down our whole body?
Yes, it would. Just as the video says it would. It does this becausue your heart and brain (and everything else in you) is just a bunch of particles and those particles would operate slower because of the speed you are travelling.
This effect would create relative time to the time you left, perpetual velocity or speed,created by the redirection off mass through the field creating gravitational thrust or warp drive,seperating the ship from the field where the field pushes the craft through itself,creating speeds similar to the quantum entanglement or string theory,as the ship surface has negative mass or far faster time realative to the time of space time.inner time would stay relative to external time frames. Hypothetical
All of your posts here are completely and utterly nonsence. You seem to know scientific words, but don't understand their actual meanings as well as the theories they relate to.
How about this....energy is in 2 stated, one with frequency and one without or neutral....the universe is a neutral energy boson field, when one boson vibrates with frequency it propagates the said frequency on and off(c contstant mechanism) over to the next in-line. Mass or electrostatic low orbits are created by mass gained from the field while it travels through it. Now to reduce the mass of matter, cover your ship in YCBO superconductors...higher electron orbits, low mass, perpetual velocity
It's same when you travel a 500 miles, it seems to you like a 100000 years and when you call your home and say " i've just arrived" - you get - " What? Already? " effect :)
Through relativity theory of Einstein of over one century, it hold with strength - as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. From relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now 2011, disciples of to Einstein, preach with contumely, as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.
@Biarry unlike time however mass and distance can be justified. It is more difficult to prove something does not exist. A day is segmented into 24 hours but that is not the inherent nature of time it is just a suitable mathematical figure to split the day into, that was applied at the time clocks were invented. Before clocks no one thought of the day in terms of hours or minutes. It was just the passing of the sun and the moon and the cycle which determined the passing of days.
Send me 100 € by "tomorrow", and I'll pay back 1 billion - after 100 quintillion periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom pass (about 300 Earth revolutions around it's star). There shouldn't be any connection between movement of celestial bodies, properties of some atom and our life expectancy so I guess you'd agree.
Better yet - make your answer before I post this comment.
@Biarry lol I love your comment about the diet. Time by it's very nature is theoretical. It does not exist in the natural world, the fact that it is quantified does not prove it's existence. Time is a man made concept much like mass and distance, these can be used to measure objects in the nature world but the objects do not inherently posses them they are man made units applied to them.
@biarry Thanks Biarry for your response but clocks only measure a 24 hour day segmented into hours, minutes and seconds at best they are good instruments to plan your day. You will not go back in time if you turn you clock back it would just display the wrong time lol.
@seeropiaz Clock measure time. Base unit gives a meaning to a number, but it does not define the property itself.
Two identical balls always have the same diametar. It doesn't matter if we use meters, light-years, yards, cubits or Planck lengths to measure them - you get the two equal numbers every time because the property (length) is the same.
And if scales show your weight is "-20" it does not mean your low-fat diet worked better than you expected. Same goes when fiddling with the clock.
Our body (mass) is made of light; Divine Light. Light travels approximately 186,282 miles per second. Divine light moves faster than light. Divine light has no speed limit; it has unlimited speed. So we can move faster than the speed of light. The infinite amount of energy needed is Love.
Love governs the law of physics. Love can break the laws of physics. Love is so powerful that it can move you faster than the speed of light. It moves you instantaneous though time and space :)o*o
Time is not a quantifiable entity. Infact I would go far enough to suggest that time does not actually exist. Clocks are a means of quantifying the pre determined passage of two celestial bodies. Which are then categorised into minutes, hours, days and so on. What we perceive as the passage of time is the pre determined actions of cells and celestial bodies. When a child grows up it's not time but the pre defined actions of cells which can then be categorised to give the impression of time pass
Not quite. Einstein showed us that time is a real thing...no just a made up way of knowing when to let the cat out. Time is, in fact, a measurement of how much "change" there is in a system. Without change in a system (not celestial bodies or cells), time would have no meaning. This is why scientists say that at a singularity, time ceases to exist...because at the singularity, there is no change and the system is closed so there is nothing to see and nothing to measure.
a still train having burning candle on his top at one end and one guy at another end , train takes a speed of light , now question is when will the guy know the burning candle has stop burning , well he shall never know even the candle has stooped burning in real as the speed of image of stooped burning candle towards the guy is equal to speed of train that is moving at speed of light....THEORY OF RELATIVITY
No, he would know because if the guy is on the train, then regardless of the speed, he and the candle are travelling at the same speed, so relative to him the candle is stationary.
@minanda01 I speak universal truth which applies to everyone. Because you can’t comprehend me, so you attack me. You are not hurting me. Your hurting your self. I’m trying to explain college stuff to a 1st grader. That doesn’t mean that your any less. You are going to tell me what real is when your in the illusion. Your perception of reality is like a pin hole. I’m desiring to broaden your view :)o*o
@minanda01 I use parts of the bible to back up what I woke up to. I am a REAL scientists. I’m on the leading edge on how Time Travel, Teleporting, and how to reach alternate universes all work. My experiences is all evidence I need. I’m looking for people who want the same experiences. I’m not here to prove to any ones ego that its true. I’m giving you the keys to prove it for your self. Truth is a mater of perception. There is your truth and there is the opposition of my truth.
What happens when you go at half light speed and you shoot a laser towards you and another one behinds you at the same time? The time of the traveler would have to be reduce for him to see the light ahead at light speed. But at the same it, his time would have to be "speeded up" for him to see the light behing at light speed. It's contradictory.
@minanda01 Love is your guidance and navigation system when you travel.
The Pleiadians say. “If everything is done with Love you have the force of the Creator behind it.
Yes I say love governs the law of physics because its Gods laws and yes love can brake the law of physics. What I want to show you is how to harness this power :)o*o
@minanda01 I had an experience where I flew faster than the speed of light in a Merkabah. It took the power of love to achieve this. Love is the power of all things.
Michio Kaku says you need a power of a black hole to time travel. What no one knows its love powering a black hole. It takes love to turn the key to time travel and move faster than the speed of light. God and love is one and the same. Love even has intelligence behind it. Like a superior super genius. Love is symbiotic.
@minanda01 “And above all these put on love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony.” Colossians 3:14 (also a black hole.) “This is the message we have heard from him and proclaim to you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.” 1 John 1:5
Ramtha says “God, and so is spirit the whole of all things.” (That means that every thing is divine light. That means you too)
Uh, there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in quantum mechanics that says anything at all about what anything at all is made up of. Quantum mechanics is all about how particles (of any sub-atomic kind) act and interact.
If you want to spout your spiritual stuff, fine. But, don't make up pure fiction as the basis for it.
Our body (mass) is made of light; Divine Light. Light travels approximately 186,282 miles per second. Divine light moves faster than light. Divine light has no speed limit; it has unlimited speed. So we can move faster than the speed of light. The infinite amount of energy needed is Love.
Love governs the law of physics. Love can break the laws of physics. Love is so powerful that it can move you faster than the speed of light. It moves you instantaneous though time and space :)o*o
Lets take the fastest motor we have and put an flywheel on it. So it goes the same rpm than the motor of course. Then we put the fotonclocks on different radisues of the machine and the later we look, how much the movineg throgh space with different speeds worked on that light.
just because his heart and the clock slowed down doesnt mean any less time has passed; i think it just means there was some form of stasis for him. how does that light clock make sense anyways, the fact that the particle has to travel further shouldnt make a difference because its the ship that is adding the velocity.. unless there is some type of resistance coming through the clock that makes the particle lose verticle speed when horizontal speed increases
You are forgetting that the speed of light is constant. So, if light has to travel a longer distance because of its motion and it's speed can't change, then the amount of time it takes to travel that distance is what must change.
This is why, to the observer, the speed of light is constant. It is them (the observer) that time passes slower for although they don't notice it.
@tehL4N The speed of light doesn't slow down because time does. Time slows down because the speed of light is a constant. If the speed of light weren't a constant and could bend as needed then time could stay a constant. But, since light is a constant, something's got to give and that's time.
@WeirdoBc The speed of light doesn't change, what changes is the time it takes for the photon to reach the other side of the clock.
For example, there are two roads from your house to the gas station, one is straight, one is curved. You drive down a straight road at 40m/h and it takes you 5 min. You drive down the curved road back to your house at 40m/h and it takes you 10 min. Same speed, but because of the change in distance, it takes longer.
@WeirdoBc It's an example..... He is saying obviously the human eye can't see beyond 65 fps in black and white and 35 fps in color. So even in the off chance technology existed for them to produce a video giving an example of that speed which is impossible you wouldn't be able to see it.
@WeirdoBc The light clock is a fictional thing, made up to illustrate the point. No "real" thing was actually slowed down but even if it was real, it would be no different than playing something in slow-motion so you could observe what happened more easily.
@iNightm4reZ True Idiot? Here something to think about : When you're travelling at near half speed, a light from behind you would take more time to reach you, so the time would dilate and would be faster for you. A light coming from in front of you would take less time to reach you, so the time would dilate and would be slower for you. Since theres is always light from forward and behind, it makes this theory impossible. Who's a true idiot now?
@WeirdoBc They only slowed down the photon to show you how it changes with velocity. It’s no different to expressing a measurement of 1000m as 1km, doing so does not change the length.
@JustinKennith I think energy is a dimension and time and gravity are a constant within it and are regulated by the dimension or the energy. Energy travels at the same speed, but in two gravity zones from a 3rd point it appears to travel at different speeds. So light is the dimension and that's why we cant travel faster than light, because you cant travel faster than the dimension that you are in.
@mtszabo but how can that be? if you stood outside of the ship thats moving really fast with a stop watch, and you stood inside the ship with a stop watch, you would record the same amount of time that it took the ship to get from point A to point B. besides, time is an illusion, something humans invented because our primitive brains cannot comprehend reality the way they should.
@mtszabo how??? first of all, you can never determine it factually because you're never going to be on a space ship let alone one that moves at half the speed of light,
second, fuckin second, is: THINK about it. a clock's hand is a piece of whatever material you made it out of moving from one number to the next at a certain, pre-set speed in pre-set intervals. it has absolutely no relation whatsoever to "time", another human concept that exists only internally for us.
@mtszabo it's just a clock, ticking away at it's pre-determined interval speed. tell me exactly HOW the speed of a ship that it is INSIDE of, can in any way affect the speed at which this pre-determined little hand moves from one number to the next? stop thinking with all of these pre concieved notions that lunatic scientists just make up, and picture a dog damn clock inside of a space ship and one outside of a spaceship. same fucking thing. it's all IN YOUR HEAD
@Hacker343 It seems your are too much ignorant. They are just fucking trying to make understand ignorant morons like you giving those fucking simple clock example. The same way that clock delays while in speed, in the molecular level of your body everything slows down. And, you fucking moron should stop using computer, internet, phones and everything that scientist made and go to forest to live with animal.
@getaasciesh no YOUR ignorant. i would gladly go to forest and live with animal, what kind of a dumb ass argument is that? Are animals not good enough for you now? Are you actually saying that I would be a moron to chill with some animals? That's nature man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! seriously...these scientists are too much fucking ignorant, and you are for believing their utter bullshit. If scientists are so smart, then why is the world such a shit hole? Haa??? internetz is for Brainwashing..get real.
Well, I'm sorry you're having a hard time grasping the concept of relativity, but you're surely not alone. The fact of the matter is that the equations are testable, have been tested, and show to be accurate. I've already linked to a video showing one of the experiments, so at this point: Debate over.
oh yeah ph1600
five0fuzzy 1 month ago
the problem with time travel if every one had the abilty to it time would change every second one minute the nazis won ww2 the next they loset but japan destroyed the usa
smilly456 2 months ago
So where is the link to the video that shows the opposite effect?
dirtydixy7 2 months ago
Really I just can't believe this stuff. Just because a certain kind of particle moves at a certain speed does not necessarily mean it determines time. Maybe someone else's perception of what is happening, but not actual time.
sinhatomy 2 months ago
OMGGG at 3:20 he broke the law of the angle of incidence=the angle of reflection!!!! the world is ending!
AustinCanavan 3 months ago
what would be the speed if 2 lights one behind bertrand and one light shining from the front would they still uphold to einsteins law concerning the speed of light if bertrand is moving towards the light in front at close to the speed of light which light would hitting him would be fastest? the one in front or the back? or is there an explanation
74bluewolf 3 months ago
@74bluewolf The speed of light is ALWAYS 300,000 km/s. ALWAYS.
RojOdio 3 days ago
@74bluewolf I know that except maybe the point of reference from the moving object would allow the light in front to reach him first since time is not absolute but it is subject to a moving object. Is about a friend of mine he doesnt get this concept and argues that the light should reach him at the same time in which I completely disagree.
74bluewolf 2 days ago
Who disliked this video? Seriously. Even Hitler would like this video. Oh I know....creationists...
AroundSun 3 months ago
@notreallythatawesome yes traveling at the speed of light wouldn't get us far anyway. Alcubierre drive is the current best idea for space travel, and it removes the problem of time dilation.
Rat454 3 months ago
so essentially, our making it to the closest solar system to ours is possible. Although it would be a 1000 years in the future before we made it there. By the time an astronaut made it there, his family back home would be dead, his grandkids would also have died, so I'm guessing no one would volunteer for a mission like that.
notreallythatawesome 4 months ago
@notreallythatawesome exactly. BUT. What is great though is the fact that this is the only way we CAN visit the stars. Because, for the astronaut on board, he doesn't notice the difference. If time didn't slow down for him, he could only make it like 80 light years away instead of millions of light years away. Maybe in the distant future when people live longer, the ship that is traveling can be like a communal living system, and can carry many many people and equipment.
AroundSun 3 months ago
@AroundSun Yeah, I was thinking about that. I wonder if we could effectively reproduce earth's environment in a way that satisfied everyone on board. But, making a journey like that would be very risky, because over millions of light years away, The whole human race could be extinct by the time the pilots or whoever got back. I'm guessing, even if we had the capability, we wouldn't make such a journey unless it was absolutely neccesary. like before our sun goes red giant.
notreallythatawesome 3 months ago
@notreallythatawesome It isn't millions of light years for those who are on board whatever craft is moving at 80% or more of the speed of light. Only to us earth people
AroundSun 3 months ago
@AroundSun Yeah, so if in the millions of years they're gone, when they come back, the earth could've gone into an ice age or something. We also could have stopped believing they'd return and not be prepared at all for their arrival. We, back at home, could descend into a second Dark Ages and mostly die out...
notreallythatawesome 3 months ago
@notreallythatawesome This is all true. There is no guarantee. But by the time we are traveling near light speed visiting galaxies, humans will have spread out to other planets and solar systems, maybe to other galaxies. So earth may just be the cradle of civilization of history. Where it all started. But not the only planet harboring life. Then again, there are wormholes. Maybe we could use them to go millions of light years away and come home in five minutes. That'd be nice.
AroundSun 3 months ago
How Einstein found this?!?
ilifeform 4 months ago
@ilifeform Vacuums, particle colliders, photon research, and just being fucking smart lol
AroundSun 3 months ago
@manoharbabu1 Thanks for showing your amazing lack of comprehension.
Aviatorsmith 4 months ago
@manoharbabu1 I did not say that i'm right. I said that you are wrong. Your facetious attitude would never bring you forward in science.
Aviatorsmith 4 months ago
@manoharbabu1 That only proves me right. Time travel is defined as something experiencing time at a different rate compared to us. Anything moving at a different velocity compared to us will experience time at a different rate. Your example is also invalid as according to the formula for time dilation, to extend your life span by 30 times, you would need to move at 99.9994% the speed of light. Traveling at 99% only increases it by 12 times. You failed to prove me wrong AND cited wrong evidence.
Aviatorsmith 4 months ago
WOW...............
Bracerjack 4 months ago
@manoharbabu1 Time travel is not a hoax. It has been experimentally proven.
Aviatorsmith 4 months ago
@manoharbabu1 Since when did I say that it was practical? I never mentioned it. You didn't state it in your original reply either. The theory of general relativity can and has been proven to work as per equations. If you can't comprehend what I am saying, please do not try to prove me wrong. If you were trying to ask a question, please phrase it like one and I will be glad to help you with your queries.
Aviatorsmith 4 months ago
@manoharbabu1 That is the theory of general relativity.
Aviatorsmith 4 months ago
@leto85 if everything in your body slows down by the same amount that is not a problem. Your pulse is not slowing down compared with the chemistry inside your cells.
Anviking13 4 months ago
But if your heartbeat also slows down and you still goes faster, wouldn't this just kill you? That way you could travel through time, but not surviving it, unfortuniatly.
Leto85 4 months ago
@manoharbabu1
ok...ends here
arguing fool means there are two!
yacirkhan 4 months ago
@manoharbabu1
i already did (stop) it after my second reply ()re-read it).
I replied again only because of your lie.
anyhow..I stop here ... just wanna way be respectful when u talk to others and their believes.
yacirkhan 4 months ago
@manoharbabu1
oh...so you're a "liar" too!!! where did i say it is "just theory".
yacirkhan 4 months ago
@manoharbabu1
First of all my last reply to you....as i cannot use such language that you use!
Secondly, i didn't make fun of Einstein's theory.....i just called it a "theory" ... and if you think it is making fun, than what could be more childish than that. It is really A theory!
yacirkhan 4 months ago
Too bad you have to be going close to light speed for this "time travel" effect to be apparent, and we're so far away from light speed spacecraft it's not even funny.
TheAkmurda 4 months ago
@manoharbabu1
These are all theories ... Einstein's relativity is also the theory. Before making fun of others, plz understand that fact.
So, here is new development for you!
Faster than light particles found, claim scientists
guardian.co.uk/science/2011/sep/22/faster-than-light-particles-neutrinos
yacirkhan 4 months ago
wait, but don't people age? so it doesn't matter if time seem slow around them, their organs run on their own time: the time of life and death. so after 100 years, it'll start shutting down (if not already shutted down), right? just trying to tie biology into this.
sniperdude5236 4 months ago
@sniperdude5236 - He mentioned that everything, your heart rate, brainwaves and everything will slow down....... So maybe the lifespan of the cells of your organs also increases..... or rather..... since the time is slower, your cells take longer to die..... So your organs dont shut down..... they too have lived only through an hour.......
mrzalon 4 months ago
What ever you may say, at least I dont abuse . Why , coz I dont have to prove any thing by shouting or abusing. All knowledge & everything & every one (u & me) belongs to The God Almighty Allah :-)
MajAamir 4 months ago
This is the Belief of the Muslims how Prophet Muhammad ascended to Sky / Havens , 1450 years before we knew this theory of Sir Albert Eisenstein, on a Horse Burraq (The Lightning Speed) from Jerusalem (Where now is The Dom of rock) ALLAH KNOWS BETTER. Subhan Allah.
MajAamir 4 months ago
Ovo Sava Savanovic na pocetku.
zivdar 5 months ago
light travels 670,000,000 mph. lets say light is racing against a spaceship that travels 669,999,999 mph. that means the spaceship would be traveling 1 mph less than light. would the light overtaking the spaceship look the same?
greatman6655 5 months ago
@greatman6655 the more you approach the speed of light, the more your mass is close to infinite, so it would take infinite energy for that to happen. So in theory, nothing can travel at the speed of light except photons (light) because photons have zero mass. But to get back to your question, let me give you an example: If you are in a car, you turn you flashlight on, for someone outside (NOT moving), he/she will perceive the light at the same speed, not 300000 km/h + car speed. happy to help!
PlatynumEagle 5 months ago
@PlatynumEagle Good explanation. The only problems with it are that photons have zero REST mass and light travels at 300000km/s not 300000km/h (:
Aviatorsmith 5 months ago
@Aviatorsmith yes sorry about that mistake, i forgot to mention that photons DO NOT EXIST if they do not move, so you are right!
PlatynumEagle 5 months ago
@greatman6655 If you are in the spaceship, the light will overtake you at the speed of light. If you are outside the spaceship, you will see the light overtake the spaceship at 1mph
Aviatorsmith 5 months ago
Can't believe that most ppl here judging from the comment still don't understand it. The light is only traveling diagonally for a observer. For the spaceships if they are moving at the same speed at direction to them they are pretty much at rest compared to each other, meaning that the photon is traveling only up and down. The explanation of why light travels at the same speed but different distances is because time is different for the third party observer then the spaceships.
kenshinsong7 5 months ago
Comment removed
kenshinsong7 5 months ago
wow. that's all you have to do. I'm on it. Lets ride a laser beam!!!
Showbolt1 6 months ago
Comment removed
Showbolt1 6 months ago
u can slow the effect of time, but can you go backwards?
BZdaKritta 6 months ago
now how do we get back....
AkamusPenguin 6 months ago
I understand that the person traveling would be in a relative future compared to the person that stood still. But in order for this to be a form of time travel that is functional, wouldn't the person who has traveled have to return or be caught by the persons left in the past and in doing so reverse the effect that had been created. Or does the same effect happen on the reverse trip to the start causing even more time to lapse?
TyHenrichs 6 months ago
@marcos13af Now, to us, time is measured by clocks. So the experiment which proves that time is relative to speed is this: bounce a photon between two perfectly reflective, perfectly flat surfaces a constant distance appart and measure the time (t) it takes between hits when the apparatus is at rest. Now move the apparatus at a constant speed of v m/s. Notice that as v tends towards the speed of light (C), t tends towards 0. Hence, time slows down at high speeds.
iMarc89 7 months ago
@iMarc89 A stationary photon clock bounces photons between two mirrors at a fixed distance - and time is measured. Now, if the mirrors are moving, the photon can't simply bounce up/down because the mirrors will move away (photon can't go faster than light to keep up AND bounce at same rate)
For the photon clock to work at speed, the photon would need to be directed at an angle to hit the next position of the moving mirror. ie No longer measuring only the fixed distance between the mirrors.
grozmo1 6 months ago
@marcos13af No, I'm not. You see, the point of this is that the speed of rotation of the earth is static. So the closer you are to the centre, the faster you appear to be going, see? This debunks your spinning string around your finger experiment.
iMarc89 7 months ago
I guess everything is conditioned by gravity. Light travels slower near a bigger object than in total vacuum and taking light as an example of matter, maybe everything starts to move faster in relation to one another, when gravity increases, so that makes objects gravitational locked in an hierarchy.
vrcraft 7 months ago
@marcos13af Why can time not change? Because you decided it can't? Only last year an experiment was carried out with atomic clocks which showed that even with the slight change in relative speed observed in the earth's rotation from sea level to 1 meter above sea level, time slows at the higher altitude. Deal with it.
iMarc89 7 months ago
@iMarc89 maybe you're confused between time and momentum,this last one can be changed by the slightest shift in the range of centripetal force...
marcos13af 7 months ago
It's so obvious...time can not be changed...
You can do another experiment yourself...
Take a piece of string and tie a nut at one end and twist the other side around your finger...you'll notice that how shorter the string becomes,much faster it will spin around your finger...Conclusion: Changing the Space(distance) you will Change Speed...
3:06 you're not changing time,but just the distance the beam of light needs to travel to reach the other mirror...
marcos13af 7 months ago
@marcos13af I agree - It seems obvious that distance changes, not time itself.
The photon would need to move diagonally to keep up with the moving mirrors, so it's no longer measuring a fixed distance (between the mirrors only). If you could go forward at the speed of light, the photon clock would simply stop because the photon could only be moving exactly forward simply to keep up - I still don't see how that would mean that time itself has *actually* stopped.
character limit is limiting!
grozmo1 6 months ago
@grozmo1 Thanks.
They believe that,because they think the speed of light is constant the time must change...in this video.Imagine,the shortest way between two points is a straight line! If the light source is moving forward,the light needs to travel a bigger distance,and since the light can NOT travel faster than it's own limit,they "THINK",time must change...The Einstein's theory is not being applied correctly in this case...and the theory itself has a lot of roles,that need to be fixed.
marcos13af 6 months ago
@JMV14eva That's what we find hard to grasp as humans.
puuLzee 7 months ago
Remember guys no matter what, you cannot change the past no matter what. So if people did time travel then that would mean that they can not be allowed to harm anything according to phisics because science says that if it already happened then it cant be undone. Do u know hwere im headed guys. Think hard and soon u will know who the time travelers really are.
TheEagpro2 7 months ago
the thing is the time travel is possible only for futur but not for the past base on my calculs.
kudosandy 7 months ago
I think we only way we can time travel is to stop the cell aging process, we must have an internal reference clocks that our body has as from medical conditions where people age due to various conditions like Progeria, if the process of aging slowed to due to speed such that the body could not assert time then the cells may be frozen in time. I get sick of this travel at the speed of light, WE'VE CRASH so it's not possible so Einstein theory would never ever work in even theory.
theapeman10 7 months ago
well there is a problem with this and it is highlight by this example I 'll make up lets say another person takes 10 hours to fly half way around the world. I travel to the same place at the speed of light. Now since I spent 10 hours at home watching youtube videos and got there at the same time at the last moment , I have time travelled, however nothing as changed except my location and timezone. If set off 10 hours before him and get there I will have to wait 10 hours for him to arrive.
theapeman10 7 months ago
i got the idea of this theory...but i dont think, we can surpass time and go ahead of it, unto the hundreds or thousands of years in the future..for if so, then somebody should have came to our time today from the future, or from the past and claim that they been from the future or from the past.
ivanpoll 8 months ago
Brilliantly Mindblowing
parksman2112 8 months ago
Isn't that the dude that claims he went forward in time? Anyway, That's not how it works. it's like moving an hour glass, you don't manipulate time, you're manipulating the hourglass' time to get the sand to the bottom.
DiggityDoglikeDogg 8 months ago
im going to lay down under my lamp and i hope to go to the future... -;-
cossys7 8 months ago
@cossys7 That's is not even what the video says retard. -.-
puuLzee 7 months ago
@muizzmohammad6 the person traveling with it wouldn't notice a difference
Kegath 8 months ago 3
WE were taught the equation at school, it means that energy is constant and equal to product of mass and 2nd power of speed of light. which means that accelerating makes you travel faster through time and acceleration consumes increasing amounts of energy for decreasing efficiency and thus makes acceleration to LS impossible because there is no way to use all energy in universe.
635574 8 months ago
So according to this, one travels forward in time if they are moving fast?? Would this not mean that people who stay in space stations (traveling 17,500mph) for a long period of time would be aging less quickly/going forward in time?
hellothere11 9 months ago
@hellothere11
Yes, but 17,500 mp/h is so miniscule, after hundreds of year it will probably be micro second difference or less.
wonshikee 9 months ago
woww, this video really explained things well, i get time travel now
chloe4stars 9 months ago 15
@chloe4stars lol its explan nothing !
msms47 3 months ago
jesus......
ninjamuffin50 9 months ago
So if light travels approx. 186,282 miles per second, then if you were going 99.999% light speed it would still be going 186,282 miles per second relative to you. So if you were going 100% the speed of light, in a vehicle that isn't light, Would light still pass you at a rate of 186,282 miles per hour? and if so what would happen to time? would it go forward, backward, or be damaged destryoyed or disrupted?
1xDRCx 10 months ago
@1xDRCx
I think making it to the speed of light is impossible, so the rules that were demonstrated in this video would apply.
99.99999% is close, but it is not 100%
iMikeMiller 9 months ago
@iMikeMiller I know it's not possible unless an object has zero mass and infinite propultion, But I'm wondering what the theory is as to what would happen if an object that isnt made of light were to go the speed, that as far as we know, only light can travel at.
1xDRCx 9 months ago
Amazing how in centuries of evolution, fire, weapons, mechanics etc. All we are interested is in the SIMPLEST thing. Light. I think in the future people might say that Light is 'God'.... feh... science with religion dont mix well.
Narutoer321 10 months ago
@Narutoer321 I prefer you to watch this video, if you already didn't
v=06NRxaRi1pw
b3dr1z3q1r1 9 months ago
Light isn't the SIMPLEST thing, its something no one knows how it works, but it works amazing perfect for sure.
b3dr1z3q1r1 9 months ago
The photon clock is a pretty good device on visualising the time dilation effect. It's as good as it gets trying to display the 4th dimension in the 3D world.
It shows for the holder's frame of reference, the clock ticks slower when it's moving. That's about all the clock is about.
Sonobody123 10 months ago
That's It. I took my comment out. Some people can't tell the difference between a joke and a real question.
BTW, This theory is invalid. Imagine you shoot two laser, one behind you, and one forward, while you travel near the speed of light, would your time slow down to accomodate the laser going forward, or speed up to accomodate the one going the opposite way? It cannot do both, proving the invalidity of that theory.
WeirdoBc 10 months ago
@WeirdoBc
You must be a real genius. Why don't you publish some paper? Might be the next noble prize coming.
The answer to your question is called the inertial frame of reference. For yourself, both beams are going at full speed of light away from you. For an observer on Earth, you're traveling at ~c, both light beams going at full speed of light, relative to the observer. c is absolute.
The photon clock tries to visualise time to help you understand how things are, but don't rely on it.
Sonobody123 10 months ago
this experiment is impossible, reaching the speed of light is impossible according to all theories, and the light clock should move 2x faster than the speed of light for the experiment to work, I mean to see the delay, if we know that speed of light doesn't change no matter how fast we move and in what direction.
b3dr1z3q1r1 10 months ago
@b3dr1z3q1r1 The speed of light has to change for this theory to be correct. Speed is distance over time, So if an object is going 99% the speed of light according to this theory light would still pass the object at 186,282 miles per second, therefore time must be the factor that is changing, making the light go faster by decreasing the time it takes to travel. To increase speed you must either increase the distance in an amount of time or as in this case, decrease the time for a given distance.
1xDRCx 9 months ago
kinda creepy.. i really should'nt try to think about these things so much. To bad i'm so damn curious.
GroundPhobia 10 months ago
screw this its too complacated
BoomBrush 10 months ago
This is a theory not fact, Time is not medium that we can pick a point and travel to, we made units of time, Seconds minutes hours and so on, the french invented a metric clock, NO BODY EVER WILL CREATE A TIME TRAVEL MACHINE BECAUSE NO ONE FROM THE FUTURE HAS CAME BACK, our mushy bodies could not cope with a quarter of the speed of light, only in a vacuum would these speeds be possible because of air resistance, way to many factors IMHO
Pyp28 10 months ago
@Pyp28 Quote: "NO BODY EVER WILL CREATE A TIME TRAVEL MACHINE BECAUSE NO ONE FROM THE FUTURE HAS CAME BACK", that's false, you can't travel back before the time machine is made. So it's possible that a time machine has been made in the future but they can't go back in time before the time machine was there.
Quote: "only in a vacuum would these speeds be possible because of air resistance" no, it's plain impossible. You can't even accelerate a proton to the speed of light.
Davidbasque15 10 months ago
Words written before Einstein was born... let me know your thoughts as to why "lesser light" / "longer time" is considered "above" or "greater". See Book of Abraham scriptures: lds.org/scriptures/pgp/abr/3.15?lang=eng#7
strapen2good 11 months ago
Comment removed
strapen2good 11 months ago
Comment removed
strapen2good 11 months ago
Comment removed
strapen2good 11 months ago
Comment removed
strapen2good 11 months ago
Oh just to be clear the device on the moving ship is a photon that moves at the speed of light if you were on the same ship looking at it. Basically it is a device that measures the speed of light?
ghmahama1 11 months ago
This video is so well done I can actually understand it fully. It's simple but Effective. I can now explain the theory to people and appear to be smarter than I am. Lol
ghmahama1 11 months ago
@Everyone who answered me : Can't you get a joke?
WeirdoBc 11 months ago
You don't actually slow down at all, you only seem to from the point of view of an observer. Motion is relative - you would see the observer moving at close to the speed of light and having a slowed down heartbeat. To you, the observer is moving. To the observer, you are moving.
HackneySack 11 months ago
@HackneySack
But since relativity states that neither party is wrong in their observation, then you "are" in fact, slowing down. This is more than just academic, it is true physically and is why astronaught's watches (that were synced with atomic clocks on earth) are a few seconds behind when they arrive home from long durations in space.
TechTrainSolutions 11 months ago
Yes your heart slows down but you won't see change in it.
Only people that are not moving at the speed of light or slower than you would be able to tell.
Easy example let's say u have 2 stop watches u set them both on at the same time.
You take one with you on the ship n travel at the speed of light for an hour. When you stop ur stop watch will say 1 hour the one you left it be a different time.
DurangoMex1989 11 months ago
a second is a second? a proton moving from a designated point to point (second in distance) i can understand, well if you are travelling at the speed of light it is going to take longer because of the distance which i can also understand. This doesnt change the fact a second is a second long? if you are travelling at the speed of light a second passes regardless of how long it takes the proton to reach each point, can anybody clear this up for me? am i missing something?
SowdenLFC 11 months ago
@SowdenLFC
What you are missing is that what we call a "second" is based on the vibrations of a caesium 133 atom. And, as the video says, if you take that atom along for the ride, it's frequency vibrations will slow down. To an outside observer this well be seen as time slowing down but to you (riding along with the atom), nothing will appear to be any different.
Your problem understanding this is thinking that the amount of time that goes by in a second is finite and unalterable.
TechTrainSolutions 11 months ago
do we have only one way to measure time. if yes is it so efficient .
sandeep8kumar09 11 months ago
What I don't really understand is how travelling at that speed would slow down a human for example. Would it slow down our heartbeat and therefor slow down our whole body?
AverageJoe2511 11 months ago
@AverageJoe2511
Yes, it would. Just as the video says it would. It does this becausue your heart and brain (and everything else in you) is just a bunch of particles and those particles would operate slower because of the speed you are travelling.
TechTrainSolutions 11 months ago
@TechTrainSolutions Thanks man!
AverageJoe2511 11 months ago
This effect would create relative time to the time you left, perpetual velocity or speed,created by the redirection off mass through the field creating gravitational thrust or warp drive,seperating the ship from the field where the field pushes the craft through itself,creating speeds similar to the quantum entanglement or string theory,as the ship surface has negative mass or far faster time realative to the time of space time.inner time would stay relative to external time frames. Hypothetical
SASNIGHTCRAWLER 1 year ago
@SASNIGHTCRAWLER
All of your posts here are completely and utterly nonsence. You seem to know scientific words, but don't understand their actual meanings as well as the theories they relate to.
Your approach stinks of "baffle them with bull".
TechTrainSolutions 11 months ago
@TechTrainSolutions do you understand.....suck my dick?
SASNIGHTCRAWLER 11 months ago
How about this....energy is in 2 stated, one with frequency and one without or neutral....the universe is a neutral energy boson field, when one boson vibrates with frequency it propagates the said frequency on and off(c contstant mechanism) over to the next in-line. Mass or electrostatic low orbits are created by mass gained from the field while it travels through it. Now to reduce the mass of matter, cover your ship in YCBO superconductors...higher electron orbits, low mass, perpetual velocity
SASNIGHTCRAWLER 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Trusted name on Latino women marriage service rockmycity.info
reliyoquik 1 year ago
It's same when you travel a 500 miles, it seems to you like a 100000 years and when you call your home and say " i've just arrived" - you get - " What? Already? " effect :)
crackmaster88 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
Through relativity theory of Einstein of over one century, it hold with strength - as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. From relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now 2011, disciples of to Einstein, preach with contumely, as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
wow...i understand it finally! thanks pal.
kentoiful 1 year ago
@Biarry
That makes no sense at all, but thanks for taking the time to type it. I guess you have alot of "time" on your hands. Lol.
seeropiaz 1 year ago
@Biarry unlike time however mass and distance can be justified. It is more difficult to prove something does not exist. A day is segmented into 24 hours but that is not the inherent nature of time it is just a suitable mathematical figure to split the day into, that was applied at the time clocks were invented. Before clocks no one thought of the day in terms of hours or minutes. It was just the passing of the sun and the moon and the cycle which determined the passing of days.
seeropiaz 1 year ago
@seeropiaz Let's test time.
Send me 100 € by "tomorrow", and I'll pay back 1 billion - after 100 quintillion periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom pass (about 300 Earth revolutions around it's star). There shouldn't be any connection between movement of celestial bodies, properties of some atom and our life expectancy so I guess you'd agree.
Better yet - make your answer before I post this comment.
Biarry 1 year ago
@Biarry lol I love your comment about the diet. Time by it's very nature is theoretical. It does not exist in the natural world, the fact that it is quantified does not prove it's existence. Time is a man made concept much like mass and distance, these can be used to measure objects in the nature world but the objects do not inherently posses them they are man made units applied to them.
seeropiaz 1 year ago
You folks are all going to land in the loony-bin if you keep trying to figure this stuff out.
johnhk9005 1 year ago
@biarry Thanks Biarry for your response but clocks only measure a 24 hour day segmented into hours, minutes and seconds at best they are good instruments to plan your day. You will not go back in time if you turn you clock back it would just display the wrong time lol.
seeropiaz 1 year ago
@seeropiaz Clock measure time. Base unit gives a meaning to a number, but it does not define the property itself.
Two identical balls always have the same diametar. It doesn't matter if we use meters, light-years, yards, cubits or Planck lengths to measure them - you get the two equal numbers every time because the property (length) is the same.
And if scales show your weight is "-20" it does not mean your low-fat diet worked better than you expected. Same goes when fiddling with the clock.
Biarry 1 year ago
Comment removed
getaasciesh 1 year ago
Our body (mass) is made of light; Divine Light. Light travels approximately 186,282 miles per second. Divine light moves faster than light. Divine light has no speed limit; it has unlimited speed. So we can move faster than the speed of light. The infinite amount of energy needed is Love.
Love governs the law of physics. Love can break the laws of physics. Love is so powerful that it can move you faster than the speed of light. It moves you instantaneous though time and space :)o*o
TimeTravelTruther 1 year ago
Time is not a quantifiable entity. Infact I would go far enough to suggest that time does not actually exist. Clocks are a means of quantifying the pre determined passage of two celestial bodies. Which are then categorised into minutes, hours, days and so on. What we perceive as the passage of time is the pre determined actions of cells and celestial bodies. When a child grows up it's not time but the pre defined actions of cells which can then be categorised to give the impression of time pass
seeropiaz 1 year ago
@seeropiaz If the time does not exists - why do clocks tick at the same rate?
If they measure nothing - why do they always measure the same amount of it?
Biarry 1 year ago
@seeropiaz
Not quite. Einstein showed us that time is a real thing...no just a made up way of knowing when to let the cat out. Time is, in fact, a measurement of how much "change" there is in a system. Without change in a system (not celestial bodies or cells), time would have no meaning. This is why scientists say that at a singularity, time ceases to exist...because at the singularity, there is no change and the system is closed so there is nothing to see and nothing to measure.
TechTrainSolutions 11 months ago
a still train having burning candle on his top at one end and one guy at another end , train takes a speed of light , now question is when will the guy know the burning candle has stop burning , well he shall never know even the candle has stooped burning in real as the speed of image of stooped burning candle towards the guy is equal to speed of train that is moving at speed of light....THEORY OF RELATIVITY
thepan070 1 year ago
@thepan070
No, he would know because if the guy is on the train, then regardless of the speed, he and the candle are travelling at the same speed, so relative to him the candle is stationary.
TechTrainSolutions 11 months ago
the 3;07 is there relly a clock like that ,,,whats that green light wow
omarbon23 1 year ago
@minanda01 I speak universal truth which applies to everyone. Because you can’t comprehend me, so you attack me. You are not hurting me. Your hurting your self. I’m trying to explain college stuff to a 1st grader. That doesn’t mean that your any less. You are going to tell me what real is when your in the illusion. Your perception of reality is like a pin hole. I’m desiring to broaden your view :)o*o
TimeTravelTruther 1 year ago
@minanda01 I use parts of the bible to back up what I woke up to. I am a REAL scientists. I’m on the leading edge on how Time Travel, Teleporting, and how to reach alternate universes all work. My experiences is all evidence I need. I’m looking for people who want the same experiences. I’m not here to prove to any ones ego that its true. I’m giving you the keys to prove it for your self. Truth is a mater of perception. There is your truth and there is the opposition of my truth.
TimeTravelTruther 1 year ago
What happens when you go at half light speed and you shoot a laser towards you and another one behinds you at the same time? The time of the traveler would have to be reduce for him to see the light ahead at light speed. But at the same it, his time would have to be "speeded up" for him to see the light behing at light speed. It's contradictory.
WeirdoBc 1 year ago
@minanda01 Love is your guidance and navigation system when you travel.
The Pleiadians say. “If everything is done with Love you have the force of the Creator behind it.
Yes I say love governs the law of physics because its Gods laws and yes love can brake the law of physics. What I want to show you is how to harness this power :)o*o
TimeTravelTruther 1 year ago
@minanda01 I had an experience where I flew faster than the speed of light in a Merkabah. It took the power of love to achieve this. Love is the power of all things.
Michio Kaku says you need a power of a black hole to time travel. What no one knows its love powering a black hole. It takes love to turn the key to time travel and move faster than the speed of light. God and love is one and the same. Love even has intelligence behind it. Like a superior super genius. Love is symbiotic.
TimeTravelTruther 1 year ago
@minanda01 “And above all these put on love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony.” Colossians 3:14 (also a black hole.) “This is the message we have heard from him and proclaim to you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all.” 1 John 1:5
Ramtha says “God, and so is spirit the whole of all things.” (That means that every thing is divine light. That means you too)
TimeTravelTruther 1 year ago
@minanda01 Just because you can’t comprehend some thing, doesn’t mean its bull shit.
Quantum mechanics says that every thing is frozen light. That means you too.
Iv seen on mushrooms that every thing is made of sparkling light moving in tiny circles powered by love. Power in an atom is love.
The bible “Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love”. 1 John 4:8
TimeTravelTruther 1 year ago
@TimeTravelTruther
Uh, there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING in quantum mechanics that says anything at all about what anything at all is made up of. Quantum mechanics is all about how particles (of any sub-atomic kind) act and interact.
If you want to spout your spiritual stuff, fine. But, don't make up pure fiction as the basis for it.
TechTrainSolutions 11 months ago
@minanda01 I found 3 souses that said the same thing.
Quantum Mechanics
The Bible
Mushrooms :)o*o
TimeTravelTruther 1 year ago
Our body (mass) is made of light; Divine Light. Light travels approximately 186,282 miles per second. Divine light moves faster than light. Divine light has no speed limit; it has unlimited speed. So we can move faster than the speed of light. The infinite amount of energy needed is Love.
Love governs the law of physics. Love can break the laws of physics. Love is so powerful that it can move you faster than the speed of light. It moves you instantaneous though time and space :)o*o
TimeTravelTruther 1 year ago
Here is an idea for experiment on earth
Lets take the fastest motor we have and put an flywheel on it. So it goes the same rpm than the motor of course. Then we put the fotonclocks on different radisues of the machine and the later we look, how much the movineg throgh space with different speeds worked on that light.
TheNewVideos 1 year ago
I never understood the light thing. How can that be??!
TheNewVideos 1 year ago
@TheNewVideos
dont let u confused. everything matters in the brain i think of this theory.
muckido 1 year ago
just because his heart and the clock slowed down doesnt mean any less time has passed; i think it just means there was some form of stasis for him. how does that light clock make sense anyways, the fact that the particle has to travel further shouldnt make a difference because its the ship that is adding the velocity.. unless there is some type of resistance coming through the clock that makes the particle lose verticle speed when horizontal speed increases
JustinKennith 1 year ago
@JustinKennith
You are forgetting that the speed of light is constant. So, if light has to travel a longer distance because of its motion and it's speed can't change, then the amount of time it takes to travel that distance is what must change.
This is why, to the observer, the speed of light is constant. It is them (the observer) that time passes slower for although they don't notice it.
TechTrainSolutions 11 months ago
Comment removed
WeirdoBc 1 year ago 2
@WeirdoBc The speed of light is the same for a constant medium. However, light traveling through water or glass will slow down.
ddog17billybob 1 year ago
@WeirdoBc they didn't really slow down time, they just slowed down the visual representation so that you could see what is happening.
TheRumpletiltskin 1 year ago
@WeirdoBc because time slows down, doesnt mean the speed of light does
tehL4N 1 year ago
@tehL4N The speed of light doesn't slow down because time does. Time slows down because the speed of light is a constant. If the speed of light weren't a constant and could bend as needed then time could stay a constant. But, since light is a constant, something's got to give and that's time.
TechTrainSolutions 11 months ago
@WeirdoBc The speed of light doesn't change, what changes is the time it takes for the photon to reach the other side of the clock.
For example, there are two roads from your house to the gas station, one is straight, one is curved. You drive down a straight road at 40m/h and it takes you 5 min. You drive down the curved road back to your house at 40m/h and it takes you 10 min. Same speed, but because of the change in distance, it takes longer.
Tonoue 1 year ago
Comment removed
stubudd1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@WeirdoBc
the light didn't slow down, it traveled further- it took longer to tick. light didn't slow down, time did
stubudd1 1 year ago
@WeirdoBc It's an example..... He is saying obviously the human eye can't see beyond 65 fps in black and white and 35 fps in color. So even in the off chance technology existed for them to produce a video giving an example of that speed which is impossible you wouldn't be able to see it.
ScrewGlennBeck 11 months ago
@WeirdoBc The light clock is a fictional thing, made up to illustrate the point. No "real" thing was actually slowed down but even if it was real, it would be no different than playing something in slow-motion so you could observe what happened more easily.
TechTrainSolutions 11 months ago
@WeirdoBc ur a true idiot
iNightm4reZ 10 months ago
@iNightm4reZ True Idiot? Here something to think about : When you're travelling at near half speed, a light from behind you would take more time to reach you, so the time would dilate and would be faster for you. A light coming from in front of you would take less time to reach you, so the time would dilate and would be slower for you. Since theres is always light from forward and behind, it makes this theory impossible. Who's a true idiot now?
WeirdoBc 10 months ago
@WeirdoBc they slowed it down to give an example....
iNightm4reZ 10 months ago
@WeirdoBc the speed of light is always the same. its time that changes, not light.
terra61 10 months ago
@WeirdoBc They only slowed down the photon to show you how it changes with velocity. It’s no different to expressing a measurement of 1000m as 1km, doing so does not change the length.
Hope this helps
Andylocksigma 10 months ago
i dont believe it. i think time is a constant.
JustinKennith 1 year ago
@JustinKennith I think energy is a dimension and time and gravity are a constant within it and are regulated by the dimension or the energy. Energy travels at the same speed, but in two gravity zones from a 3rd point it appears to travel at different speeds. So light is the dimension and that's why we cant travel faster than light, because you cant travel faster than the dimension that you are in.
SASNIGHTCRAWLER 1 year ago
@JustinKennith
There have been experiments performed that show that time is -not- constant. It slows down with speed.
mtszabo 1 year ago
@mtszabo but how can that be? if you stood outside of the ship thats moving really fast with a stop watch, and you stood inside the ship with a stop watch, you would record the same amount of time that it took the ship to get from point A to point B. besides, time is an illusion, something humans invented because our primitive brains cannot comprehend reality the way they should.
Hacker343 1 year ago
@Hacker343
You would think that, but in reality, the watch on the ship moving faster records less time.
watch?v=gdRmCqylsME to see the experiment.
mtszabo 1 year ago
@mtszabo how??? first of all, you can never determine it factually because you're never going to be on a space ship let alone one that moves at half the speed of light,
second, fuckin second, is: THINK about it. a clock's hand is a piece of whatever material you made it out of moving from one number to the next at a certain, pre-set speed in pre-set intervals. it has absolutely no relation whatsoever to "time", another human concept that exists only internally for us.
Hacker343 1 year ago
@mtszabo it's just a clock, ticking away at it's pre-determined interval speed. tell me exactly HOW the speed of a ship that it is INSIDE of, can in any way affect the speed at which this pre-determined little hand moves from one number to the next? stop thinking with all of these pre concieved notions that lunatic scientists just make up, and picture a dog damn clock inside of a space ship and one outside of a spaceship. same fucking thing. it's all IN YOUR HEAD
Hacker343 1 year ago
@Hacker343 It seems your are too much ignorant. They are just fucking trying to make understand ignorant morons like you giving those fucking simple clock example. The same way that clock delays while in speed, in the molecular level of your body everything slows down. And, you fucking moron should stop using computer, internet, phones and everything that scientist made and go to forest to live with animal.
getaasciesh 1 year ago
@getaasciesh no YOUR ignorant. i would gladly go to forest and live with animal, what kind of a dumb ass argument is that? Are animals not good enough for you now? Are you actually saying that I would be a moron to chill with some animals? That's nature man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! seriously...these scientists are too much fucking ignorant, and you are for believing their utter bullshit. If scientists are so smart, then why is the world such a shit hole? Haa??? internetz is for Brainwashing..get real.
Hacker343 1 year ago
@mtszabo i'm calling for a civil debate, i want you to tell me how that will work.
Hacker343 1 year ago
@Hacker343
Well, I'm sorry you're having a hard time grasping the concept of relativity, but you're surely not alone. The fact of the matter is that the equations are testable, have been tested, and show to be accurate. I've already linked to a video showing one of the experiments, so at this point: Debate over.
mtszabo 1 year ago