Hi...We all want to know GOD...which never comes is human form...but comes in human system...to do the work for the people....GOD never died...still working to save the humanity & persons....but we not want to see him...so we never feel that GOD is live working as human beings...but without the system today GOD power is weakened to make people get benefits from all social life....GOD means...governing over death....!
This guy takes an eternity to make a convoluted point. He has to do so much "reading between the lines" to turn this indecipherable hallucination into a cogent story that one wonders if he's paid by the hour.
Someone tell me where it says in the bible that the 2 legs of the man are divided Rome. Where is it? There are verses in the bible totally ignored in bible prophecy that call the antichrist an Assyrian. If anyone can tell me where the verse is about divided Rome than tell me.
Daniel 2:41 And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.
It clearly states that the legs, particularly the feet, represent a divided kingdom. It does not clearly state that this kingdom is Rome, but it bears all the characteristics of Rome, and what kingdom would you put in its place?
@Richardatf The only kingdom that is talked about reining is the Greek Empire in the end of days and it splits off into 4 kingdoms. The United States....my Country... is totally based on the Greek system of government.
@Richardatf Daniel 8: 19 He said: “I am going to tell you what will happen later in the time of wrath, because the vision concerns the appointed time of the end.[c] 20 The two-horned ram that you saw represents the kings of Media and Persia. 21 The shaggy goat is the king of Greece, and the large horn between its eyes is the first king. 22 The four horns that replaced the one that was broken off represent four kingdoms that will emerge from his nation but will not have the same power.
@Richardatf Whats up about something mingling with the seed of men? Daniel 2: 43And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
Mr. cshook123, I will admit, that is strange language to use that would imply that they are not seed (offspring) of men. Are they saying they are Nephilim? (Gen 6:1-4 and Num 13:33). I do not know....
@Richardatf I read that a few weeks ago and thought it was strange. Also some other strange stuff.. Revelation 9:14 Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.
Who are these angels bound in the river Euphrates?
Mr. cshook123. It does not give their names, but they are clearly angels of wrath that have been restrained until this time wherein they are loosed. You will notice throughout the Bible, that angels that are sent by God for the sake of punishment are exceedingly large, powerful, and dreadful beings. I suspect these four are more fearsome than any that precede them. I believe they are fallen angels that have been bound up, and released to punish those who are not sealed by God,
@Richardatf Exactly. Have you ever read the book of Enoch. It talks about God binding up these beings until the day of slaughter. The offspring of the nephilum.
Mr. Cshook123, Yes, as I recall The Book of Enoch speaks of these spirits being bound up in prisons of six sided glass, I always think of the energy stored in a quartz crystal, could we be powering our wristwatches with evil spirits? I also think we can see evidence of the Nephilim in modern peoples (glowering foreheads, brutish natures), and I believe the "neanderthal" was actually Nephilim. But I suppose it is all acadamic. We must always remember that Jesus' sacrifice is everything.
@Richardatf Yes that's probably why there is crystal worship.The neanderathal and other strange bones found with horns are most likely Nephilim. Of course our lord and savior and his sacrifice for sin on the cross is most important.
@Richardatf The book of Enoch Chapter XV 9. The spirits of the giants shall be like clouds, which shall oppress, corrupt, fall, contend, and bruise upon earth.
10. They shall cause lamentation. No food shall they eat; and they shall be thirsty; they shall be
p. 22
concealed, and shall not 1 rise up against the sons of men, and against women; for they come forth during the days of slaughter and destruction.
@Richardatf Ten Book of Enoch Chapter XV 9. The spirits of the giants shall be like clouds, which shall oppress, corrupt, fall, contend, and bruise upon earth.
10. They shall cause lamentation. No food shall they eat; and they shall be thirsty; they shall be
p. 22
concealed, and shall not 1 rise up against the sons of men, and against women; for they come forth during the days of slaughter and destruction.
Sadly, most of the world only knows Yahushua by the name of "Jesus Christ," which, besides being a very poor translation, completely LACKS the intended meaning of the Hebrew name, that is "Yah Saves." Every time you use the name, "Yahushua," you proclaim to the whole world that "Yahuwah Saves!" The name Jesus has no such meaning, nor such testimony. SORRY is the TRUTH.. HalleluYAH
@Hugovstar You seem to be missing the whole point. The New Testament's original language is Greek. In Greek, a J has an english Y sound. Just as in Spanish the J has the H sound. This is because in Genesis 11:7, God confounded the people's language. The name that Adam called God is not even spoken today because of the curse of confused tongues that God pronounced. Yahashua in pronunciation is not a special formula for God's grace. We are saved by grace through faith. Speech does't save.
@459triple3 That is my point.. You are missing the point the Savior is not a GREEK and he came for the lost sheep of ISRAEL.. The word Lord and God are pagan words. Is just proper respect to call our father YHWH and Yahushua not pagan titles..Work out your own salvation with fear...Faith is to followed in his foot steps. There are 100 of scriptures about his name...Call upon his name to be SAVED.. to be YAHUSHUA
@Hugovstar These scriptures that are of his name, what language are they in. The Messiah may not have been Greek, but that does not mean that He did not come to save the WORLD from their sin. What, you think that God only loves those who have some kind of diluted gene-link to Abraham and all others He damns to hell because of an accident of birth? He confounded the language of men. He accepts the name that those languages call Him as. Do you think, YHWH is what Adam called Him. I think not.
the catholics are not the anti-christ, they have their problems, but they do not deny the father and the son. What religion denies the father and the son? What religion hates the Christians and Jews? What religion practices beheading? What religion will kill you if you don't worship their "god"?
does anybody want the real truth? this here is close but do you really want the truth? watch this series on you tube a,b,c 1 to 7 and eight look for them all . the absolute truth here Walid Shoebat A1 of 7
@Hugovstar Are you aware that the name Peter is the English pronunciation of the name Pedro in Spanish? Do you know that the name William in English is Guillermo in Spanish and Guillom in French? The name Yeshua or Yahushua in Hebrew is the name Joshua in English and Jesu in Italian (pronounced Heh-soo) and Jesus in Greek (pronounced Yeh-soos). As you can see, the proper pronunciation in Greek is close to the original Hebrew name. Your argument is without any foundation.
@459triple3 Again, the context reveals that this scripture is referring to Joshua, the son of Nun and not the Messiah. All other translations put "Joshua" here. Why then is it translated 'Jesus'? The answer lies in the Greek/Latin corruption of the Messiah's original Hebrew name. Originally, the name of the Messiah was , pronounced Yahushua. This is the Messiah's original name.
@459triple3 When the Gentiles tried to transliterate His name into Greek, they came up with ihsoun or "Iesous". But originally, this word was from #3091 in the Hebrew which is . When Iesous was transliterated into Latin, it became "Iesus", which was then carried over into English it became our modern day "Jesus" when the letter "J" developed.
@459triple3 Therefore, the reason the King James Version has "Jesus" in those two verses is because the Messiah's name is actually the same name as Joshua, Son of Nun... correctly pronounced "Yahushua". It is quite evident that the modern form "Jesus" doesn't even remotely resemble the original name that the disciples were praying in, baptizing in and receiving so much criticism for preaching in. This is fact. Do some research and see for yourself.
I call today for all people that love Jesus Christ to stop trying to bring chaos amonst people. Whatever religion.. God loves us all. Muslims and catholics are loved by the same god that loves you. God loves all of his children but dislikes the sin of all men. Jesus had no disgust with any person even those with desease but sin was repulsive to him.
I know there is much confusion in the world. No one has the right to bash any one's belief, as christians we can only direct people and eventually allow the Holy Spirit to convince them. We have to be tactful in the way we represent Christ
...can not have things or practices which are clearly forbidden in the Bible. For example its clearly one of the commandments that we should not have idols (statues e.t.c) yet we have statues in the Catholic church. We cannot bend God`s law. It is straight and narrow, no bends, no short cuts nothing. I hope i made sense to you. P.S this video never attacked catholic believers but the faith itself.
@TheJasonKing it is not right to prove your point by calling people names.
I agree that the catholic faith is misleading. I was raised catholic but through my own curiosity i discovered black holes in what the Catholic faith teaches and emphasizes. Name calling is not the way to prove your point.
@Enahoektap...video`s like that of David Asscherick are not made to create hate towards Catholics but to enlighten people. God is pure light, an institution which is supposed to guide us towards God...
@Destiny3440 Are you real? I havn't got no right to prove my point right coz the catholic church changed so many staff from the original scriptures? You talkin for satan?
@Destiny3440 . If you were raised in the Catholic faith then you should be aware that we DO NOT PRAY TO IDOLS, we pray to God or ask the saints to intercede on our behalf. we might look to a religious picture or statue to keep us focused on our prayer to god. please let me know the black holes that you speak of with regard to the teachings of the church, maybe I can help you. God is light my friend and amazingly even though I am catholic I Love God the father, son and holy spirit.
the catholic church has decieved millions, -changed Yeshua's name to jesus -changed Saturday to sunday -changed Passover to easter introduced christmas introduced idiols changed the type of bread & wine to what Yeshau's had the mark of the beast is allah the vatican building is based on cults & pagan gods -the catholic church does not promote the original Holy scriptures -changed the we get baptised, the word baptisim is to submerged
I am a catholic. I have been born again in the spirit. I love Jesus and follow as best I can his teachings. How can I be evil. How can my belief be evil. What you have writen is encitement to hate, why do you spread hatred about me. Jesus has saved me and changed me and now I am unable to hate. If you are part of a group that encourages you to hate, then please rethink your position. I will pray for you my friend. will you pray for me? please remain in the love of Jesus christ our lord God .
Do you follow the Holy scpritures good? Do you still keep the Sabbath day? What about passover? I am sure you are into pagan if you follow sunday, the christmas and easter. And who are to change the Son of God's name YESHUA? He never directed nobody to do so, so why you keep breaking His laws left, right and centre.
I pray for you, so maybe you open your eyes and follow the original scpritures and not the twistted ones
Could you point out to me where it says in scripture That we must use the Hebrew translation of his Holy name. Jesus is the greek translation of Yeshua. why are you caught up on that. We say that he is God.
Yes we do celebrate his birthday on december 25th and yes it was once a pagen day of celebration but we have replaced those old pagen days with days to celebrate Jesus. it ensured that people did not slip back into bad habits in the dark ages. you are a bigget my friend without the spirit
How dare u call Him with a subsitute name? You got a problem to say YESHUA? Its the 1st commandment you ding bat. You should be ashamed.
He never was born on the 25th you big donkey, people like you give bad name to christianity.
The catholic church only changed His name from over 700 people mentioned in the bible, cause of there hidden agenda, no wonder its called the drunken beast in revelation.
"Yeshua" is impossible in Greek - your quarrel is with the writers of the NT. The sound "-sh-" is impossible in Greek & Latin; it becomes an "-s-" instead. So the authors of the NT had a problem with writing "Yeshua". Many OT names are changed in the NT for that reason - "Elijah" to "Elias", for instance.
Except that "Elijah" is not his name - he's "Eliyahu" in Hebrew. Is "Elijah" bad too ? And it's the woman on the beast, not the beast she's on, that is drunk.
@TheJasonking while i agree with wat u r saying but calling ppl names and insults is not the way to get ur point across, if u behave like that no one will listen to u even if wat u r saying is the truth Matthew 7: 1-2 says 'Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again."
@TheJasonking . The mark of the beast is not Allah. You have been brain washed. The mark of the beast is derived from numeroligy. 7 is the divine number of heaven satan was cast out of heaven so 7-1= 6. satan is a triple abomination against father son and holy spirit 666. I can assure you that I am not a donkey and am in fact well able to teach you the bible. I am not an anti christ, I am a devout christian. I love God the Father, son and holy spirit.
@jalisa146 . Jalisa, In the ancient world 2,000 years ago people believed that the Christ would live for an exact period of years from conception to death. So from the date and time of the anunciation from the angel Gabriel to Mary to the death of Jesus we have 34 years. now We know that the jewish feast of passover ocured in the spring and that Jesus Christ our Lord was murdered at this time. We can therefore trace his birth back 33 years and 3 months to his birth. Christmas.
@jalisa146 ... He made all things new. Replacing the old pagan rituals with new Christian Holy days. Conceived March 25, born December 25, died March 25. Also numerology is found everywhere in the Bible. december is the 12th month the number of completion. 25 = 2+5= 7 the divine number. died 34 years exactly after conception= 3+4 =7. murdered in his 33rd year as a man 3+3= 6. The number 6 is for satan as he was cast out of heaven so we have 7 - 1 =6.
@enahoektap look i'm not trying to bash you religon or anything but the catholic church has deceived millions of ppl they even admitted that they r above God, no one is above God and they said proof of that was changing the sabbath from saturday to sunday and if u don't believe me u can go and rersearch it
@jalisa146 .. so Jesus was killed by evil. also the 666 in revelation is a triple abomination against father son and holy spirit. heaven =7. satan is 7-1=6. as he was cast out of heaven. I am a catholic. The word Catholic means universal so I am of the universal church, the bride of Christ. I love Yahweh our Holy Father, Jesus Christ and the paraclete that Jesus promised to send the Holy spirit. I renounce Satan and the evil spirits that roam the Earth working for the ruination of Gods children.
@jalisa146 ..Also if you study Isaiah 53 you will find Jesus. 'Who has percieved and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed'. My friend b the grace of god and as a blessing from him, I percieve. the scriptures have been opened up to me. the arm of the Lord is the pysical element of God. God made flesh. the right hand of God. seated at the right hand of the father, our Lord Jesus Christ.
The holy spirit rests with me, even though I am not worhty. But I do know that god loves all of us.
@TheJasonking I'm not catholic, but you should study history a little better my friend. I don't believe that the catholic beliefs are correct, but its not all their fault.
The sabbath was changed to sunday because that was the day Christ was ressurected. It was known to the origional christians (not catholics) as "the Lord's day" and was celebrated as the sabbath.
U are very ignorant of the facts of history, and the Bible. When Christ resurrected, that was not "rest". He "rested" in the tomb on the Sabbath. We are to rest on the Sabbath as God rested at creation (Heb 4:10). Christ's resurrection is not celebrated by worshiping on Sunday. Christ's death, burial, and resurrection are celebrated via Baptism. When we come up out of the water, this is the celebration of the resurrection, not Sunday observance for which the scriptures say nothing about.
It is well established that the majority of the Churches after Christ were keeping the Sabbath throughout the 1st-5th centuries. Only in Rome and Alexandra, the two bedrocks of Paganism, were beginning to keep Sunday due to Anti-Jewish and Sabbath legislation put forth by the Roman authorities. Therefore, in order to impress the Roman authorities their distinction from the Jews, they began to keep Sunday in "honor of the resurrection" to satisfy the Pagans. This is the truth my friend.
@Machoman00o I did not know this. Could you please supply the Biblical scriptures that support Sunday being the new Sabbath because of Christ's resurrection? I would like to be able to prove that the Bible is where the practice comes from. Could you please also supply the Biblical scripture that calls Sunday the Lord's Day? I only find Mark 2:27 calling Christ Lord of the Sabbath but that supports the 7th day and it's pre-resurrection. So help me out. You seem to know something I don't .
@SoDoHi I wonder how many people died in the flood compared to the 8 persons who were in the ark? If numbers is what you are looking at, then 3 billion sinnes are on their way to heaven....or is there something wrong with the numbers reasoning method?
It is absolute not funny. I don´t know any beasts. Who has written this book? You? Thank´s. My hearts don´t get to stop. Excuse me please. It was your step. For others which are living wish I the best. I thing it isn´t good to see again.
The Jiva or the individual soul is only relatively real. Its individuality lasts only so long as it is subject to unreal Upadhis or limiting conditions due to Avidya. The Jiva identifies itself with the body, mind and the senses, when it is deluded by Avidya or ignorance. Just as the bubble becomes one with the ocean when it bursts, so also the Jiva or the empirical self becomes one with Brahman when it gets knowledge of Brahman.
When knowledge dawns in it through annihilation of Avidya, it is freed from its individuality and finitude and realizes its essential Satchidananda nature. It merges itself in the ocean of bliss. The river of life joins the ocean of existence. This is the Truth.
The doctrine of advaita vedanta as expounded by Sankara can be summed up in half a verse: Brahma Satyam Jagan Mithya Jivo Brahmaiva Na Aparah" — Brahman (the Absolute) is alone real; this world is unreal; and the Jiva or the individual soul is non-different from Brahman. This is the quintessence of his philosophy.
Look & listen well people: The Antichrist is one of the first 5 kings! Study the wording in Revelation 17:8, 10-11. He is NOT the 6th or 7th King. Study these verses very closely & you'll see this is so!
If satan is the greatest liar how can one be certain that satan isn't the real author of the bible? I mean the bible is just rampant with contradictions and unclear claims. There are multitudes of people that claim to know what the bible actually says, yet they can't agree with what's actually meant.
That would apply to the American constitution as well & even interpretation of US law. It comes down to whose more powerful. You believe in both Satan and God. So whose more powerful? Whose smarter? Who made who?
What I was actually saying is what if there is only Satan? Some all powerful, hateful, and really bored demon decided to create a universe and just watch it for entertainment.
Then, just for the fun of it, this demon inspired several different religions and caused the followers to consistently try to kill each other so the demon would have something to watch.
Power corrupts, and if there were no limits to a being's power that being would be infinitely corrupt.
HAHAHAHAHAHA! Sweet, I'm of the devil. Which must mean than I should commit ever sin imaginable, make up some, and then try to sway every human I can away from the bible.
I'm so going to be totally rewarded in hell. :) I'll have my own domain, total power, it'll be an eternal party because I did such a good job for Satan.
"Power corrupts, and if there were no limits to a being's power that being would be infinitely corrupt"
This is certainly true of man, whose heart is deceitfully wicked and in whom resides no good thing in his natural. reprobate state, but it can not be extrapolated to apply to God b/c he is infinitely good and cannot be corrupted. He is light and love.
Except that by those myths, evil didn't exist until after god happened. Evil had to have come from god because god created everything. If god created evil he must have the capacity for evil.
Therefore, god is responsible for evil. Which means that god is infinitely corruptible as well.
"I mean the bible is just rampant with contradictions and unclear claims"
Unclear claims perhaps, but all the supposed contradictions are not contradictions at all if one carefully studies the text... in fact, mosy arise over translational issues.
No that is not the case, the bible has inherent contradictions that cannot be overcome. The only people that don't see the contradictions in the bible are those that are so infected with belief that their analytical skills are compromised and they aren't able to see that they are unable to recognize their flaw.
In two places in the New Testament the genealogy of Jesus is mentioned. MAT 1:6-16 and LUK 3:23-31. Each gives the ancestors of Joseph, husband of Mary and Step father of Jesus. The first one starts from Abraham(verse 2) all the way down to Jesus. The second one from Jesus all the way back to Adam. The only common name to these two lists between David and Jesus is JOSEPH.
"Each gives the ancestors of Joseph, husband of Mary and Step father of Jesus"
That's an incorrect assumption based on ignorance of Jewish custom. It was customary for genealogies to list the father even when the mother's side is the one being given.
You see the difference in the 2 verses you list in your next post, I'm sure: the Marian genealogy is given in Luke (thus the use of the "supposed" son of Joseph). There''s a good reason her genealogy is given back to David, i.e. Jeconiah
That's correct. As I said, Luke gives Mary's genealogy. It was more traditional to give the paternal genealogy amongst the Jews, and Matthew lists that one. However, Jesus did not have a biological father, and in fact, the line of Solomon (in Joseph's tree) was cursed through Jeconiah and could not be Messiah's ancestry
"The genealogies are supposed to be the same, their differences are a staggering blow to the credibility of the bible."
How are they supposed to be the same? One is Mary's and the other is Joseph's. Did you even read my reply? I explained the custom where the father is listed in the last branch even when the mother's genealogy is given.
Only Luke lists all of the women. This isn't a contradiction at all, but only a matter of teh other authors' decision to not list all of the women who went to the tomb.
If a person says that he and his friend went to the store, would it be contradictory to the testimony of an onlooker who said that that person went to the store with his friend and chauffer? Of course not, the person in leaving out the chauffer is simply deciding which details to include in his story.
- "So what else was left out? What was edited ... Why...edited?"
Whatever each particular author did not feel he needed to make his point was not included in his account. I didn't say anything was edited. The accounts are preserved in their original form.
- "If the stories are malleable based upon author, then how do you know the entire thing isn't a fabrication? "
I never said the stories were malleable. The same truth is conveyed in all the gospel accounts. Some accounts are more complete than others, and some include events others omit. Nothing is fabricated in any of them.
"The stories are different, meaning that they cannot be equally true"
This would only be the case if they contradicted one another. They do not. I am ready to show you this truth, but am getting the impression that you do not care about the truth at all.
The stories claim different facts within. This is the definition of contradiction. I care very much about truth, that is why I'm challenging ancient mythologies. The Olympians and the Asgard are no longer worshiped because they are just myths, now it is time to relegate Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism the same way, as simple mythologies.
You didn't have to say that they were edited. The fact that the stories are different means that they were edited.
Why are only 4 gospels used in the bible when over 30 were written? Could it be that the stories were deliberately edited so that they seemed to be aligned?
-"The fact that the stories are different means that they were edited"
This is faulty logic; if two reporters cover an event, the articles published to their respective papers will cover different details of the same event w/o the necessity of editing. The fact that the gospel stories are different only proves they are written by different authors.
-"Why are only 4 gospels used in the bible when over 30 were written?"
B/c the others were not universally accepted to the early church. in fact, the vast majority are Gnostic writings which did not appear until the 2nd and 3rd centuries. I presume you're referring to the Nag Hamadhi library, right? These were rejected writings by the church fathers b/c they did not bear the stamp of apostolic authorship and were clear counterfeits.
-"Could it be that the stories were deliberately edited?"
No, we have thousands of manuscripts, being dispersed all over the Byzantine empire and other places. If there was editing, there'd be gross differences in texts from one place to another. Such differences do not exist.
As long as you are looking to discredit the Word of God, the enemy of your soul will be happy to give you fodder. He wants you to join him in eternal torment. Repent - turn from your sin towards Jesus. Trust in him.
The fact that the other gospels have vastly different stories, and even the ones in common usage don't agree, your thousands of manuscripts don't add up to anything more than legends.
Why just Jesus, why not Mohammad? How about Judaism? What about Hinduism?
I won't repent until someone comes up with something more than empty claims and bad children's stories.
The self styled "Gospel of Judas" is the work of a second century Gnostic sect and has no connection to Judas or any of the Apostles.
But of course, like those whom you condemn as fanatics, I very much doubt you will "recognize facts" either.
To anyone who does, you are just another belligerent cretin who saw some unscholarly trash on TV or read some fringe tripe that is about as coherent as a David Icke bloodline, and who now believes he knows what he's talking about.
The Gospel of Judas was done in depth on National Geographic . National Geographic is a world renown and well respected news organization. I own the video, I have watched it several times. I did some background research on the Gospel of Judas.
Historians who are unbiased recognize that the Gospel of Judas is just as authentic and genuine as any of the other Gospels. It is only the religious nutters that try to dismiss it.
Indeed you can't dismiss anyone simply because you don't like what they say. But merely liking or not liking what is said is not what this is about.
Believe what you like. You can listen to Bart Ehrman and friends, long on sensationalism, gushing over what is simply nothing more than a second century gnostic work that is of no importance whatsoever when it comes to helping us understand the historical Jesus or the historical Judas and their relationship.
You have made it demonstrably clear by this and your previous posts that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and you are happy to gleefully swallow whatever baseless speculations and nonsense that takes your fancy. Not because what you believe has anything to do with factual evidence or truth, its because you like it.
Actually I'm the one who has comparied the three monotheistic belief structures against one another. I have an objective viewpoint of how they are structured and can recognize the vast flaws without being influenced by pre-exiting beliefs.
The Gospel of Judas informs us about Gnosticism, and so is of great interest as we learn more about the period from the late 2nd century through the fourth century. That is where its value lies.
But it tells us nothing about the origins of Christianity or the beginnings of the Jesus movement in the first century.
The Gospel of Judas shows that the Gospels were refined and edited to show specific viewpoints of what happened.
There is a possible homosexual relationship between Judas and Jesus in the Gospel of Judas. The text is incomplete so the truth may never be known. But, there were a great many things that Jesus told to Judas in secret. Things that made it sound that Jesus and Judas were more than just friends. Woudn't it be cool if it turned out that Jesus was bisexual?!
Oh good grief... and you call other people fanatics ?? You clearly have no interest in the facts whatsoever and are happy to indulge in the most outrageous speculations based on what ? The "Gospel of Judas" ? Good grief man get a grip.
"shows that the Gospels were refined and edited to show specific viewpoints of what happened"
This Gnostic text has nothing to do with the Gospels. It does not date, by carbon dating to before the begining of the 4th century. Written in Coptic, there is no evidence there was ever even a Greek version and it does not even bear resemblance to the 'Gospel of Judas' that Irenaeus speaks of in the 2nd century.
It gives us no insight into the Gospels or Christ.
Twice before you referenced the Gospel of Judas as 2nd century, now you just stated carbon dating to the 4th.
I looked it up, the Gospel of Judas carbon dates to AD 280 plus or minus 50 years. The four Gospels used in the bible carbon date from aroun AD 100 to AD 250 give or take a bit.
It is amazing that you are so happy to swallow, hook, line, and sinker, a story written by some Gnostic sect and calling itself the "Gospel of Judas", which clearly could not have anything to do with the historical Judas, written at best somewhere toward a century after the death of the last Apostle who was John.
Yet you are happy to dismiss the NT Gospels as mythological garbage and anyone who disagrees with you as biased at best or a religious nutter at worst.
I don't accept their story, I merely point out that according to respected archeologists it's just as authentic and meaningful as any of the other Gospels.
I can't be a fanatic, I don't have a religious belief that isn't grounded in reality. I am open and willing to change if something more than myths and legends can be put forth.
Your unquestioning embrace of the "Gospel of Judas" and its contents as factual despite evidence (which is not difficult to research) to the contrary, speaks volumes. While it may be an authentic Gnostic writing, it is far from being an authentic historical account of the life of Christ or of Judas. There is no shortage of material to back this up. But you have demonstrated no interest in finding out. Therefore you are every bit as selective and blind as those whom you condemn as religious nuts.
This is where I get to call you a fucktard, and a moronic idiot. I clearly stated that I don't accept the claims within any Gospel, they are all bullshit. Then you make the idiotic statement that "Your unquestioning embrace...etc."
Your comprehension of the English language is the problem here. Your complete misunderstanding of the point I have repeatedly made is staggering.
I am done talking with you, there will be no responses after this point.
Actually that's a good point, often times different articles cover the same event. But those articles must always be taken with a grain (or several pounds) of salt. This is because they were written by HUMANS. Which means they could very well be wrong completely.
Thank you for admitting that the four gospels in common usage could be completely wrong, or deliberately edited to benefit religious beliefs.
According to thirdeagle of the apocalypse. aka william tapely. he says in his videos that barack obama is found in chapter 7 of daniel. and that barack obama is the leopard
he says the bear is russia, dmitry medvedev is the bear. and that the lion is queen elizabeth
MEGAMAN:This is not correct. The leopard with four heads and wings on its back was symbolic of Greece during and after Alexander the Great from 331 BC to 168 BC
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The major world religions can be divided into two categories.
1) Abrahamic Religions
( ie., whose patriarch is Abraham like christianity,judaism,islam..et c)
2) Dharmic religions
( ie.,Religions which believes in dharma like Hinduism,buddism,jainism,sikhi sm.
etc)
The Advanced concepts like Dharma,Rebirth,karma,moksha..e tc are peculiar to dharmic religions. The Abrahamic religions do not have those Advanced concepts.
The Abrahamic religions cannot think beyond heaven/hell
i'm not big on like knowing the verses of the bible i have read it an i have listion to difernt preachers consrvertive an libral none of them relly made me mad acept for jhon hage that guy is relly just not good at all theres a vedio on my profile called the antichrist an signs or somthing an it saids that he will slander every god there is or somthing
My friend, we cannot quote the Bible if we can't show the verse. *smiles* If you ever want to talk about this more, you can always send me a message. Even in 6 months from now! I would love to talk about it more with you. I would be more than happy to show you verses for why I believe what I believe. It is really interesting too!
We should never take what a man says as fact, unless we can find it in the Bible!
in revalations the bible saids that there are orther gods who are good when it saids an the dragion shall give unto the beast a throne an he shall curse an say horroble things about every god there is whitch means there atleast more than one god possobly alot an the beast hates them
the apostle paul was cruxified upside down the point is the bible is not the best place to get all of you'r information jesus even said do not beleive every thing that you are told test it first then acept it
Actually Paul said that. "Prove all things, hold fast that which is good". 1 Thess. 5:21. And John says "Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world." 1 John 4:1.
Yes, we are to test the spirits! What do we test them for? 1 John 4:1 "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world." Answer: to see if they are of God!!
"If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder, And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul." - Deuteronomy 13:1-3
newpaganism said: "..the point is the Bible is not the best place to get all of your information.."
"And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." - 2 Timothy 3: 15-17
it's all in the bible if you just read it also the paul who helped write the bible was not the good paul jesus freind ths was anorther paul his real name was saul of tarus he crully persicuted christions an pagans alike he was insane an clame jesus came to him but the real truth of the matter is he just made it up to trick christion an take them away from compleating jesus mission this is the paul who help write the bible
Did you know that Paul's Epistles are actually defined as "Scripture" by Peter the Apostle?
"And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction." 2 Peter 3:15-16
he saw the devinity in the femine he was a sharman because he heald pepole of sickness yhvh is a force who both male an female because he gave birth to the world an taught that all humans can be holy
If this is what you believe, why do you believe it? Where did you find this information? It isn't in the Bible! How do you know you can trust it? Believe in it?
thinks for posting my coments i admit i kind of went over bord but jesus was a pagan because he healed a sick person in front of a statue of the roman god of health when the jews rejected him from there sping he had a covern of 13 the 12 deciples an he made the 13th member as there leader he taught libral teachings he loved nature an slept out under the stars
you show you'r deceit that you shre with you'r evil god jahova who is molock an set an el the devil him self that wicked dragion of old who was thrown out of heaven for his hate deceitfullness greed an jelousy because you don't alow orthers to share there beliefs yet you serves you'r hatred an lies down every one elses throught there a speical place for you with jahova an all his angels in Hell!!!!!!
you will be thrown by you'r horns in to the fires of hell you'r tongs shall be forked as you are serpents you'r heads cut off an the godess shall once again be worshiped nature will be repaired abba shall be worshiped an loved an praised above every thing an every one therion that is an jesus christ shall rule for a thousand years
I do not believe in a goddess. I don't know if I'm familiar with your theology, but I'm afraid it isn't Biblical by any means. I'll pray for you, my friend. Don't fall for the lies of men.
an false prophets you worship wicked gods you pervert the teachings of jesus you are full of dead maan bones the hore that is you'r morther that you all came out of the church of the age of darkness an dith an law an hate
on what basis do you make these claims?! I'm just standing on the Word of God, my friend. I am just following what the Bible teaches and letting it explain/define itself. How is this perverting teachings of the Bible?
If you relate the "facts" of "Collective Consciousness" to the "idea" of "Evolution".. what do you get ? Whats in our minds does it not manifest into our reality ? And what is "Evolution" besides men putting their heads together in order to build a "Society" ? Modern Day Evolution anyway .. Or Modern Day Evolving .. If you understand what it means hence to "Evolve" .. The process of "Going into the future" with an outlook of "Societal improvement" .. or "civilization development" ..
RELIGION is the OPIUM of the MASSES - " Karl Marx "
kopellhinex 2 months ago
i know the catholic church is antichrist
but i still serve in it
totoole67 4 months ago
Talk RUBBISH!!! WRONG interpretation! SDA founded on the foundation of anti catholic. SDA would not exist if it is not anti catholic.
watertr33 6 months ago
Good message...just can not listen to him too long...I have to take a break and return.
zuri7000 7 months ago
Hi...We all want to know GOD...which never comes is human form...but comes in human system...to do the work for the people....GOD never died...still working to save the humanity & persons....but we not want to see him...so we never feel that GOD is live working as human beings...but without the system today GOD power is weakened to make people get benefits from all social life....GOD means...governing over death....!
RCSHREEYANYAN 7 months ago
thanks for the teaching.
teta809 9 months ago
This guy takes an eternity to make a convoluted point. He has to do so much "reading between the lines" to turn this indecipherable hallucination into a cogent story that one wonders if he's paid by the hour.
jancar2012 1 year ago
Someone tell me where it says in the bible that the 2 legs of the man are divided Rome. Where is it? There are verses in the bible totally ignored in bible prophecy that call the antichrist an Assyrian. If anyone can tell me where the verse is about divided Rome than tell me.
cshook123 1 year ago
@cshook123
Daniel 2:41 And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters' clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay.
It clearly states that the legs, particularly the feet, represent a divided kingdom. It does not clearly state that this kingdom is Rome, but it bears all the characteristics of Rome, and what kingdom would you put in its place?
Richardatf 11 months ago
@Richardatf The only kingdom that is talked about reining is the Greek Empire in the end of days and it splits off into 4 kingdoms. The United States....my Country... is totally based on the Greek system of government.
cshook123 11 months ago
@Richardatf Daniel 8: 19 He said: “I am going to tell you what will happen later in the time of wrath, because the vision concerns the appointed time of the end.[c] 20 The two-horned ram that you saw represents the kings of Media and Persia. 21 The shaggy goat is the king of Greece, and the large horn between its eyes is the first king. 22 The four horns that replaced the one that was broken off represent four kingdoms that will emerge from his nation but will not have the same power.
cshook123 11 months ago
@Richardatf Whats up about something mingling with the seed of men? Daniel 2: 43And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay.
cshook123 11 months ago
Mr. cshook123, I will admit, that is strange language to use that would imply that they are not seed (offspring) of men. Are they saying they are Nephilim? (Gen 6:1-4 and Num 13:33). I do not know....
Richardatf 11 months ago
@Richardatf I read that a few weeks ago and thought it was strange. Also some other strange stuff.. Revelation 9:14 Saying to the sixth angel which had the trumpet, Loose the four angels which are bound in the great river Euphrates.
Who are these angels bound in the river Euphrates?
cshook123 11 months ago
Mr. cshook123. It does not give their names, but they are clearly angels of wrath that have been restrained until this time wherein they are loosed. You will notice throughout the Bible, that angels that are sent by God for the sake of punishment are exceedingly large, powerful, and dreadful beings. I suspect these four are more fearsome than any that precede them. I believe they are fallen angels that have been bound up, and released to punish those who are not sealed by God,
Richardatf 11 months ago
@Richardatf Exactly. Have you ever read the book of Enoch. It talks about God binding up these beings until the day of slaughter. The offspring of the nephilum.
cshook123 11 months ago
Mr. Cshook123, Yes, as I recall The Book of Enoch speaks of these spirits being bound up in prisons of six sided glass, I always think of the energy stored in a quartz crystal, could we be powering our wristwatches with evil spirits? I also think we can see evidence of the Nephilim in modern peoples (glowering foreheads, brutish natures), and I believe the "neanderthal" was actually Nephilim. But I suppose it is all acadamic. We must always remember that Jesus' sacrifice is everything.
Richardatf 11 months ago
@Richardatf Yes that's probably why there is crystal worship.The neanderathal and other strange bones found with horns are most likely Nephilim. Of course our lord and savior and his sacrifice for sin on the cross is most important.
cshook123 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Richardatf The book of Enoch Chapter XV 9. The spirits of the giants shall be like clouds, which shall oppress, corrupt, fall, contend, and bruise upon earth.
10. They shall cause lamentation. No food shall they eat; and they shall be thirsty; they shall be
p. 22
concealed, and shall not 1 rise up against the sons of men, and against women; for they come forth during the days of slaughter and destruction.
cshook123 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Richardatf Ten Book of Enoch Chapter XV 9. The spirits of the giants shall be like clouds, which shall oppress, corrupt, fall, contend, and bruise upon earth.
10. They shall cause lamentation. No food shall they eat; and they shall be thirsty; they shall be
p. 22
concealed, and shall not 1 rise up against the sons of men, and against women; for they come forth during the days of slaughter and destruction.
cshook123 11 months ago
I AM THE ANTICHRIST!!!
IH666WH 1 year ago
@IH666WH LOL, why should such a thing exist?
anantashesha 1 year ago
@IH666WH
Yes, we know....The Lord Jesus Christ rebuke you.
Richardatf 11 months ago
Sadly, most of the world only knows Yahushua by the name of "Jesus Christ," which, besides being a very poor translation, completely LACKS the intended meaning of the Hebrew name, that is "Yah Saves." Every time you use the name, "Yahushua," you proclaim to the whole world that "Yahuwah Saves!" The name Jesus has no such meaning, nor such testimony. SORRY is the TRUTH.. HalleluYAH
Hugovstar 1 year ago
@Hugovstar You seem to be missing the whole point. The New Testament's original language is Greek. In Greek, a J has an english Y sound. Just as in Spanish the J has the H sound. This is because in Genesis 11:7, God confounded the people's language. The name that Adam called God is not even spoken today because of the curse of confused tongues that God pronounced. Yahashua in pronunciation is not a special formula for God's grace. We are saved by grace through faith. Speech does't save.
459triple3 1 year ago
@459triple3 That is my point.. You are missing the point the Savior is not a GREEK and he came for the lost sheep of ISRAEL.. The word Lord and God are pagan words. Is just proper respect to call our father YHWH and Yahushua not pagan titles..Work out your own salvation with fear...Faith is to followed in his foot steps. There are 100 of scriptures about his name...Call upon his name to be SAVED.. to be YAHUSHUA
Hugovstar 1 year ago
@Hugovstar These scriptures that are of his name, what language are they in. The Messiah may not have been Greek, but that does not mean that He did not come to save the WORLD from their sin. What, you think that God only loves those who have some kind of diluted gene-link to Abraham and all others He damns to hell because of an accident of birth? He confounded the language of men. He accepts the name that those languages call Him as. Do you think, YHWH is what Adam called Him. I think not.
459triple3 1 year ago
@Hugovstar Kay, than why is Lord and God used WAY more frequently in the Bible, than Yahweh or Yeshua.
BDProductions34 8 months ago
1JOHN2:27
frenchis19 1 year ago
the catholics are not the anti-christ, they have their problems, but they do not deny the father and the son. What religion denies the father and the son? What religion hates the Christians and Jews? What religion practices beheading? What religion will kill you if you don't worship their "god"?
only1chance1 1 year ago
does anybody want the real truth? this here is close but do you really want the truth? watch this series on you tube a,b,c 1 to 7 and eight look for them all . the absolute truth here Walid Shoebat A1 of 7
pittless22 1 year ago
First his name is NOT JESUS.. Who is the lawlessness?
JESUS is the only one in the MIDST that is taught is Not the Same Yahushua of the TORAH.
Hugovstar 1 year ago
@Hugovstar Are you aware that the name Peter is the English pronunciation of the name Pedro in Spanish? Do you know that the name William in English is Guillermo in Spanish and Guillom in French? The name Yeshua or Yahushua in Hebrew is the name Joshua in English and Jesu in Italian (pronounced Heh-soo) and Jesus in Greek (pronounced Yeh-soos). As you can see, the proper pronunciation in Greek is close to the original Hebrew name. Your argument is without any foundation.
459triple3 1 year ago
@459triple3 Again, the context reveals that this scripture is referring to Joshua, the son of Nun and not the Messiah. All other translations put "Joshua" here. Why then is it translated 'Jesus'? The answer lies in the Greek/Latin corruption of the Messiah's original Hebrew name. Originally, the name of the Messiah was , pronounced Yahushua. This is the Messiah's original name.
Hugovstar 1 year ago
@459triple3 When the Gentiles tried to transliterate His name into Greek, they came up with ihsoun or "Iesous". But originally, this word was from #3091 in the Hebrew which is . When Iesous was transliterated into Latin, it became "Iesus", which was then carried over into English it became our modern day "Jesus" when the letter "J" developed.
Hugovstar 1 year ago
@459triple3 Therefore, the reason the King James Version has "Jesus" in those two verses is because the Messiah's name is actually the same name as Joshua, Son of Nun... correctly pronounced "Yahushua". It is quite evident that the modern form "Jesus" doesn't even remotely resemble the original name that the disciples were praying in, baptizing in and receiving so much criticism for preaching in. This is fact. Do some research and see for yourself.
In Messiah Name... Hugo Nun
Hugovstar 1 year ago
this is like school for children lol. but isnt all religion :)
paddymourinho 1 year ago
I call today for all people that love Jesus Christ to stop trying to bring chaos amonst people. Whatever religion.. God loves us all. Muslims and catholics are loved by the same god that loves you. God loves all of his children but dislikes the sin of all men. Jesus had no disgust with any person even those with desease but sin was repulsive to him.
enahoektap 1 year ago
There is NO antichrist nor antichrishna, Infantilism.
lizazoon 1 year ago
I know there is much confusion in the world. No one has the right to bash any one's belief, as christians we can only direct people and eventually allow the Holy Spirit to convince them. We have to be tactful in the way we represent Christ
TheGuzmanrob 2 years ago
...can not have things or practices which are clearly forbidden in the Bible. For example its clearly one of the commandments that we should not have idols (statues e.t.c) yet we have statues in the Catholic church. We cannot bend God`s law. It is straight and narrow, no bends, no short cuts nothing. I hope i made sense to you. P.S this video never attacked catholic believers but the faith itself.
Destiny3440 2 years ago
@TheJasonKing it is not right to prove your point by calling people names.
I agree that the catholic faith is misleading. I was raised catholic but through my own curiosity i discovered black holes in what the Catholic faith teaches and emphasizes. Name calling is not the way to prove your point.
@Enahoektap...video`s like that of David Asscherick are not made to create hate towards Catholics but to enlighten people. God is pure light, an institution which is supposed to guide us towards God...
Destiny3440 2 years ago
@Destiny3440 Are you real? I havn't got no right to prove my point right coz the catholic church changed so many staff from the original scriptures? You talkin for satan?
TheJasonking 1 year ago
@Destiny3440 . If you were raised in the Catholic faith then you should be aware that we DO NOT PRAY TO IDOLS, we pray to God or ask the saints to intercede on our behalf. we might look to a religious picture or statue to keep us focused on our prayer to god. please let me know the black holes that you speak of with regard to the teachings of the church, maybe I can help you. God is light my friend and amazingly even though I am catholic I Love God the father, son and holy spirit.
enahoektap 1 year ago
XDD
Wtf is this shit?
Ozzy0sbourne 2 years ago
1 Billion Catholics can't be Wrong. Shame on You... and Repent!
SoDoHi 2 years ago
TheJasonking 2 years ago 9
I am a catholic. I have been born again in the spirit. I love Jesus and follow as best I can his teachings. How can I be evil. How can my belief be evil. What you have writen is encitement to hate, why do you spread hatred about me. Jesus has saved me and changed me and now I am unable to hate. If you are part of a group that encourages you to hate, then please rethink your position. I will pray for you my friend. will you pray for me? please remain in the love of Jesus christ our lord God .
enahoektap 2 years ago
Do you follow the Holy scpritures good? Do you still keep the Sabbath day? What about passover? I am sure you are into pagan if you follow sunday, the christmas and easter. And who are to change the Son of God's name YESHUA? He never directed nobody to do so, so why you keep breaking His laws left, right and centre.
I pray for you, so maybe you open your eyes and follow the original scpritures and not the twistted ones
TheJasonking 2 years ago
Could you point out to me where it says in scripture That we must use the Hebrew translation of his Holy name. Jesus is the greek translation of Yeshua. why are you caught up on that. We say that he is God.
Yes we do celebrate his birthday on december 25th and yes it was once a pagen day of celebration but we have replaced those old pagen days with days to celebrate Jesus. it ensured that people did not slip back into bad habits in the dark ages. you are a bigget my friend without the spirit
enahoektap 2 years ago
How dare u call Him with a subsitute name? You got a problem to say YESHUA? Its the 1st commandment you ding bat. You should be ashamed.
He never was born on the 25th you big donkey, people like you give bad name to christianity.
The catholic church only changed His name from over 700 people mentioned in the bible, cause of there hidden agenda, no wonder its called the drunken beast in revelation.
Go and play with your idoils you fake christian
TheJasonking 2 years ago
## @ TheJasonking
"Yeshua" is impossible in Greek - your quarrel is with the writers of the NT. The sound "-sh-" is impossible in Greek & Latin; it becomes an "-s-" instead. So the authors of the NT had a problem with writing "Yeshua". Many OT names are changed in the NT for that reason - "Elijah" to "Elias", for instance.
Except that "Elijah" is not his name - he's "Eliyahu" in Hebrew. Is "Elijah" bad too ? And it's the woman on the beast, not the beast she's on, that is drunk.
5355vbxjbj76rvn 2 years ago
@TheJasonking while i agree with wat u r saying but calling ppl names and insults is not the way to get ur point across, if u behave like that no one will listen to u even if wat u r saying is the truth Matthew 7: 1-2 says 'Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again."
GOD BLESS!
jalisa146 1 year ago
@TheJasonking . The mark of the beast is not Allah. You have been brain washed. The mark of the beast is derived from numeroligy. 7 is the divine number of heaven satan was cast out of heaven so 7-1= 6. satan is a triple abomination against father son and holy spirit 666. I can assure you that I am not a donkey and am in fact well able to teach you the bible. I am not an anti christ, I am a devout christian. I love God the Father, son and holy spirit.
enahoektap 1 year ago
@enahoektap Jesus was never born on the 25th of dec and it is still a pagan holiday they r just using christianity to cover it up
jalisa146 1 year ago
@jalisa146 . Jalisa, In the ancient world 2,000 years ago people believed that the Christ would live for an exact period of years from conception to death. So from the date and time of the anunciation from the angel Gabriel to Mary to the death of Jesus we have 34 years. now We know that the jewish feast of passover ocured in the spring and that Jesus Christ our Lord was murdered at this time. We can therefore trace his birth back 33 years and 3 months to his birth. Christmas.
enahoektap 1 year ago
@jalisa146 ... He made all things new. Replacing the old pagan rituals with new Christian Holy days. Conceived March 25, born December 25, died March 25. Also numerology is found everywhere in the Bible. december is the 12th month the number of completion. 25 = 2+5= 7 the divine number. died 34 years exactly after conception= 3+4 =7. murdered in his 33rd year as a man 3+3= 6. The number 6 is for satan as he was cast out of heaven so we have 7 - 1 =6.
enahoektap 1 year ago
@enahoektap look i'm not trying to bash you religon or anything but the catholic church has deceived millions of ppl they even admitted that they r above God, no one is above God and they said proof of that was changing the sabbath from saturday to sunday and if u don't believe me u can go and rersearch it
God Bless!
jalisa146 1 year ago
@jalisa146 .. so Jesus was killed by evil. also the 666 in revelation is a triple abomination against father son and holy spirit. heaven =7. satan is 7-1=6. as he was cast out of heaven. I am a catholic. The word Catholic means universal so I am of the universal church, the bride of Christ. I love Yahweh our Holy Father, Jesus Christ and the paraclete that Jesus promised to send the Holy spirit. I renounce Satan and the evil spirits that roam the Earth working for the ruination of Gods children.
enahoektap 1 year ago
@jalisa146 ..Also if you study Isaiah 53 you will find Jesus. 'Who has percieved and to whom has the arm of the Lord been revealed'. My friend b the grace of god and as a blessing from him, I percieve. the scriptures have been opened up to me. the arm of the Lord is the pysical element of God. God made flesh. the right hand of God. seated at the right hand of the father, our Lord Jesus Christ.
The holy spirit rests with me, even though I am not worhty. But I do know that god loves all of us.
enahoektap 1 year ago
@enahoektap so u r a catholic? no wonder u believe in this crap
jalisa146 1 year ago
@TheJasonking how do you know that???
what's the name of the video with all this information?
enditall727 1 year ago
@TheJasonking i agree with wat u said but u got one thing wrong, the mark of the beast is the National Sundal Law not Allah
jalisa146 1 year ago
@TheJasonking I'm not catholic, but you should study history a little better my friend. I don't believe that the catholic beliefs are correct, but its not all their fault.
The sabbath was changed to sunday because that was the day Christ was ressurected. It was known to the origional christians (not catholics) as "the Lord's day" and was celebrated as the sabbath.
Machoman00o 1 year ago
@Macho
U are very ignorant of the facts of history, and the Bible. When Christ resurrected, that was not "rest". He "rested" in the tomb on the Sabbath. We are to rest on the Sabbath as God rested at creation (Heb 4:10). Christ's resurrection is not celebrated by worshiping on Sunday. Christ's death, burial, and resurrection are celebrated via Baptism. When we come up out of the water, this is the celebration of the resurrection, not Sunday observance for which the scriptures say nothing about.
Lysimachus78 1 year ago
@Macho
It is well established that the majority of the Churches after Christ were keeping the Sabbath throughout the 1st-5th centuries. Only in Rome and Alexandra, the two bedrocks of Paganism, were beginning to keep Sunday due to Anti-Jewish and Sabbath legislation put forth by the Roman authorities. Therefore, in order to impress the Roman authorities their distinction from the Jews, they began to keep Sunday in "honor of the resurrection" to satisfy the Pagans. This is the truth my friend.
Lysimachus78 1 year ago
@Machoman00o I did not know this. Could you please supply the Biblical scriptures that support Sunday being the new Sabbath because of Christ's resurrection? I would like to be able to prove that the Bible is where the practice comes from. Could you please also supply the Biblical scripture that calls Sunday the Lord's Day? I only find Mark 2:27 calling Christ Lord of the Sabbath but that supports the 7th day and it's pre-resurrection. So help me out. You seem to know something I don't .
459triple3 1 year ago
@SoDoHi am afraid they are wrong like the 1.2 billion muslims
TheJasonking 1 year ago
@SoDoHi I wonder how many people died in the flood compared to the 8 persons who were in the ark? If numbers is what you are looking at, then 3 billion sinnes are on their way to heaven....or is there something wrong with the numbers reasoning method?
459triple3 1 year ago
WOW that guy is annoying and full of shit!
believerornot 2 years ago
It is absolute not funny. I don´t know any beasts. Who has written this book? You? Thank´s. My hearts don´t get to stop. Excuse me please. It was your step. For others which are living wish I the best. I thing it isn´t good to see again.
Juryas 2 years ago
The Jiva or the individual soul is only relatively real. Its individuality lasts only so long as it is subject to unreal Upadhis or limiting conditions due to Avidya. The Jiva identifies itself with the body, mind and the senses, when it is deluded by Avidya or ignorance. Just as the bubble becomes one with the ocean when it bursts, so also the Jiva or the empirical self becomes one with Brahman when it gets knowledge of Brahman.
princegoutham 2 years ago
When knowledge dawns in it through annihilation of Avidya, it is freed from its individuality and finitude and realizes its essential Satchidananda nature. It merges itself in the ocean of bliss. The river of life joins the ocean of existence. This is the Truth.
princegoutham 2 years ago
The doctrine of advaita vedanta as expounded by Sankara can be summed up in half a verse: Brahma Satyam Jagan Mithya Jivo Brahmaiva Na Aparah" — Brahman (the Absolute) is alone real; this world is unreal; and the Jiva or the individual soul is non-different from Brahman. This is the quintessence of his philosophy.
princegoutham 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look & listen well people: The Antichrist is one of the first 5 kings! Study the wording in Revelation 17:8, 10-11. He is NOT the 6th or 7th King. Study these verses very closely & you'll see this is so!
mrlantern23 2 years ago
know god
sharpshootermatthew 2 years ago
If satan is the greatest liar how can one be certain that satan isn't the real author of the bible? I mean the bible is just rampant with contradictions and unclear claims. There are multitudes of people that claim to know what the bible actually says, yet they can't agree with what's actually meant.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
That would apply to the American constitution as well & even interpretation of US law. It comes down to whose more powerful. You believe in both Satan and God. So whose more powerful? Whose smarter? Who made who?
mrlantern23 2 years ago
What I was actually saying is what if there is only Satan? Some all powerful, hateful, and really bored demon decided to create a universe and just watch it for entertainment.
Then, just for the fun of it, this demon inspired several different religions and caused the followers to consistently try to kill each other so the demon would have something to watch.
Power corrupts, and if there were no limits to a being's power that being would be infinitely corrupt.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
The Bible says to avoid such unlearned questions. Yours would by far and away fit into that category. I think you're of the devil.
Over.
mrlantern23 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHA! Sweet, I'm of the devil. Which must mean than I should commit ever sin imaginable, make up some, and then try to sway every human I can away from the bible.
I'm so going to be totally rewarded in hell. :) I'll have my own domain, total power, it'll be an eternal party because I did such a good job for Satan.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
"Power corrupts, and if there were no limits to a being's power that being would be infinitely corrupt"
This is certainly true of man, whose heart is deceitfully wicked and in whom resides no good thing in his natural. reprobate state, but it can not be extrapolated to apply to God b/c he is infinitely good and cannot be corrupted. He is light and love.
boan000 2 years ago
Except that by those myths, evil didn't exist until after god happened. Evil had to have come from god because god created everything. If god created evil he must have the capacity for evil.
Therefore, god is responsible for evil. Which means that god is infinitely corruptible as well.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
"I mean the bible is just rampant with contradictions and unclear claims"
Unclear claims perhaps, but all the supposed contradictions are not contradictions at all if one carefully studies the text... in fact, mosy arise over translational issues.
boan000 2 years ago
No that is not the case, the bible has inherent contradictions that cannot be overcome. The only people that don't see the contradictions in the bible are those that are so infected with belief that their analytical skills are compromised and they aren't able to see that they are unable to recognize their flaw.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
Well, name one then and we'll analyze it together.
boan000 2 years ago
In two places in the New Testament the genealogy of Jesus is mentioned. MAT 1:6-16 and LUK 3:23-31. Each gives the ancestors of Joseph, husband of Mary and Step father of Jesus. The first one starts from Abraham(verse 2) all the way down to Jesus. The second one from Jesus all the way back to Adam. The only common name to these two lists between David and Jesus is JOSEPH.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
"Each gives the ancestors of Joseph, husband of Mary and Step father of Jesus"
That's an incorrect assumption based on ignorance of Jewish custom. It was customary for genealogies to list the father even when the mother's side is the one being given.
You see the difference in the 2 verses you list in your next post, I'm sure: the Marian genealogy is given in Luke (thus the use of the "supposed" son of Joseph). There''s a good reason her genealogy is given back to David, i.e. Jeconiah
boan000 2 years ago
That doesn't answer the question as to why there are a different number of generations listed, and why there are different people listed.
The two genealogies are not the same.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
"The two genealogies are not the same."
That's correct. As I said, Luke gives Mary's genealogy. It was more traditional to give the paternal genealogy amongst the Jews, and Matthew lists that one. However, Jesus did not have a biological father, and in fact, the line of Solomon (in Joseph's tree) was cursed through Jeconiah and could not be Messiah's ancestry
boan000 2 years ago
The genealogies are supposed to be the same, their differences are a staggering blow to the credibility of the bible.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
"The genealogies are supposed to be the same, their differences are a staggering blow to the credibility of the bible."
How are they supposed to be the same? One is Mary's and the other is Joseph's. Did you even read my reply? I explained the custom where the father is listed in the last branch even when the mother's genealogy is given.
boan000 2 years ago
MAT 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
LUK 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
How about the number of women that went to Jesus's tomb?
MT 28:1 The first visitors to the tomb were Mary Magdalene and the other Mary (two).
MK 16:1 Both of the above plus Salome (three).
LK 23:55 - 24:1, 24:10 Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary the mother of James, and "other women" (at least five).
JN 20:1 Mary Magdalene only (one).
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
Only Luke lists all of the women. This isn't a contradiction at all, but only a matter of teh other authors' decision to not list all of the women who went to the tomb.
If a person says that he and his friend went to the store, would it be contradictory to the testimony of an onlooker who said that that person went to the store with his friend and chauffer? Of course not, the person in leaving out the chauffer is simply deciding which details to include in his story.
boan000 2 years ago
So what else was left out? What was edited and what was significant enough to be left in all editions? Why did things get edited?
If the stories are malleable based upon author, then how do you know the entire thing isn't a fabrication?
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
- "So what else was left out? What was edited ... Why...edited?"
Whatever each particular author did not feel he needed to make his point was not included in his account. I didn't say anything was edited. The accounts are preserved in their original form.
boan000 2 years ago
- "If the stories are malleable based upon author, then how do you know the entire thing isn't a fabrication? "
I never said the stories were malleable. The same truth is conveyed in all the gospel accounts. Some accounts are more complete than others, and some include events others omit. Nothing is fabricated in any of them.
boan000 2 years ago
The stories are different, meaning that they cannot be equally true. If accuracy is in question, then how can one choose to believe at all?
Face it, the whole thing is just another ancient mythology. Just like the Olympians or the Asgard.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
"The stories are different, meaning that they cannot be equally true"
This would only be the case if they contradicted one another. They do not. I am ready to show you this truth, but am getting the impression that you do not care about the truth at all.
boan000 2 years ago
The stories claim different facts within. This is the definition of contradiction. I care very much about truth, that is why I'm challenging ancient mythologies. The Olympians and the Asgard are no longer worshiped because they are just myths, now it is time to relegate Christianity, Judaism, Islam, and Hinduism the same way, as simple mythologies.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
You didn't have to say that they were edited. The fact that the stories are different means that they were edited.
Why are only 4 gospels used in the bible when over 30 were written? Could it be that the stories were deliberately edited so that they seemed to be aligned?
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
-"The fact that the stories are different means that they were edited"
This is faulty logic; if two reporters cover an event, the articles published to their respective papers will cover different details of the same event w/o the necessity of editing. The fact that the gospel stories are different only proves they are written by different authors.
boan000 2 years ago
-"Why are only 4 gospels used in the bible when over 30 were written?"
B/c the others were not universally accepted to the early church. in fact, the vast majority are Gnostic writings which did not appear until the 2nd and 3rd centuries. I presume you're referring to the Nag Hamadhi library, right? These were rejected writings by the church fathers b/c they did not bear the stamp of apostolic authorship and were clear counterfeits.
boan000 2 years ago
-"Could it be that the stories were deliberately edited?"
No, we have thousands of manuscripts, being dispersed all over the Byzantine empire and other places. If there was editing, there'd be gross differences in texts from one place to another. Such differences do not exist.
As long as you are looking to discredit the Word of God, the enemy of your soul will be happy to give you fodder. He wants you to join him in eternal torment. Repent - turn from your sin towards Jesus. Trust in him.
boan000 2 years ago
The fact that the other gospels have vastly different stories, and even the ones in common usage don't agree, your thousands of manuscripts don't add up to anything more than legends.
Why just Jesus, why not Mohammad? How about Judaism? What about Hinduism?
I won't repent until someone comes up with something more than empty claims and bad children's stories.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
Apparently you don't know about the actual archeological findings. The gospel of Judas is just as authentic as Luke, Matthew, John, etc.
The others are only rejected because religious fanatics will not recognize facts. It's the same with evolution.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
The self styled "Gospel of Judas" is the work of a second century Gnostic sect and has no connection to Judas or any of the Apostles.
But of course, like those whom you condemn as fanatics, I very much doubt you will "recognize facts" either.
To anyone who does, you are just another belligerent cretin who saw some unscholarly trash on TV or read some fringe tripe that is about as coherent as a David Icke bloodline, and who now believes he knows what he's talking about.
Congratulations.
Keruaran 2 years ago
The Gospel of Judas was done in depth on National Geographic . National Geographic is a world renown and well respected news organization. I own the video, I have watched it several times. I did some background research on the Gospel of Judas.
Historians who are unbiased recognize that the Gospel of Judas is just as authentic and genuine as any of the other Gospels. It is only the religious nutters that try to dismiss it.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
The reputation of National Geographic has declined in recent years due to a number of very poor articles. The Gospel of Judas being one of them.
Keruaran 2 years ago
No, National Geographic is still one of the most renown news jornals/magazines on the planet.
You can't dismiss them just because you don't like what they say.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
Indeed you can't dismiss anyone simply because you don't like what they say. But merely liking or not liking what is said is not what this is about.
Believe what you like. You can listen to Bart Ehrman and friends, long on sensationalism, gushing over what is simply nothing more than a second century gnostic work that is of no importance whatsoever when it comes to helping us understand the historical Jesus or the historical Judas and their relationship.
Or you can do some real reading...
Keruaran 2 years ago
Sorry bub, I've read the Bible, Koran, and Torah. It's how I came to the conclusion that they all are a bunch of mythological junk.
All three belief structures make the same claims, they just use different words.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
You have made it demonstrably clear by this and your previous posts that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about and you are happy to gleefully swallow whatever baseless speculations and nonsense that takes your fancy. Not because what you believe has anything to do with factual evidence or truth, its because you like it.
Keruaran 2 years ago
Actually I'm the one who has comparied the three monotheistic belief structures against one another. I have an objective viewpoint of how they are structured and can recognize the vast flaws without being influenced by pre-exiting beliefs.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
The Gospel of Judas informs us about Gnosticism, and so is of great interest as we learn more about the period from the late 2nd century through the fourth century. That is where its value lies.
But it tells us nothing about the origins of Christianity or the beginnings of the Jesus movement in the first century.
Keruaran 2 years ago
The Gospel of Judas shows that the Gospels were refined and edited to show specific viewpoints of what happened.
There is a possible homosexual relationship between Judas and Jesus in the Gospel of Judas. The text is incomplete so the truth may never be known. But, there were a great many things that Jesus told to Judas in secret. Things that made it sound that Jesus and Judas were more than just friends. Woudn't it be cool if it turned out that Jesus was bisexual?!
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
Oh good grief... and you call other people fanatics ?? You clearly have no interest in the facts whatsoever and are happy to indulge in the most outrageous speculations based on what ? The "Gospel of Judas" ? Good grief man get a grip.
Keruaran 2 years ago
"shows that the Gospels were refined and edited to show specific viewpoints of what happened"
This Gnostic text has nothing to do with the Gospels. It does not date, by carbon dating to before the begining of the 4th century. Written in Coptic, there is no evidence there was ever even a Greek version and it does not even bear resemblance to the 'Gospel of Judas' that Irenaeus speaks of in the 2nd century.
It gives us no insight into the Gospels or Christ.
Keruaran 2 years ago
Twice before you referenced the Gospel of Judas as 2nd century, now you just stated carbon dating to the 4th.
I looked it up, the Gospel of Judas carbon dates to AD 280 plus or minus 50 years. The four Gospels used in the bible carbon date from aroun AD 100 to AD 250 give or take a bit.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
You should read what I have posted more carefully since it is evident that you have not done so.
Keruaran 2 years ago
@Keruaran
Well said Keruaran regarding the Gospel of Judas.
Lysimachus78 2 years ago
National Geograpic did the report on the Gospel of Judas. It's just as legitimate as any other Gospel.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
It is amazing that you are so happy to swallow, hook, line, and sinker, a story written by some Gnostic sect and calling itself the "Gospel of Judas", which clearly could not have anything to do with the historical Judas, written at best somewhere toward a century after the death of the last Apostle who was John.
Yet you are happy to dismiss the NT Gospels as mythological garbage and anyone who disagrees with you as biased at best or a religious nutter at worst.
Better go look in the mirror.
Keruaran 2 years ago
I don't accept their story, I merely point out that according to respected archeologists it's just as authentic and meaningful as any of the other Gospels.
I can't be a fanatic, I don't have a religious belief that isn't grounded in reality. I am open and willing to change if something more than myths and legends can be put forth.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
You have already demonstrated in previous posts the exact opposite to what you now protest here.
Keruaran 2 years ago
Your unquestioning embrace of the "Gospel of Judas" and its contents as factual despite evidence (which is not difficult to research) to the contrary, speaks volumes. While it may be an authentic Gnostic writing, it is far from being an authentic historical account of the life of Christ or of Judas. There is no shortage of material to back this up. But you have demonstrated no interest in finding out. Therefore you are every bit as selective and blind as those whom you condemn as religious nuts.
Keruaran 2 years ago
This is where I get to call you a fucktard, and a moronic idiot. I clearly stated that I don't accept the claims within any Gospel, they are all bullshit. Then you make the idiotic statement that "Your unquestioning embrace...etc."
Your comprehension of the English language is the problem here. Your complete misunderstanding of the point I have repeatedly made is staggering.
I am done talking with you, there will be no responses after this point.
You are a fucktard moron.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
The idiocy of your own comments are self evident to anyone who bothers to read this thread.
Keruaran 2 years ago
Actually that's a good point, often times different articles cover the same event. But those articles must always be taken with a grain (or several pounds) of salt. This is because they were written by HUMANS. Which means they could very well be wrong completely.
Thank you for admitting that the four gospels in common usage could be completely wrong, or deliberately edited to benefit religious beliefs.
13shadowwolf 2 years ago
According to thirdeagle of the apocalypse. aka william tapely. he says in his videos that barack obama is found in chapter 7 of daniel. and that barack obama is the leopard
he says the bear is russia, dmitry medvedev is the bear. and that the lion is queen elizabeth
megaman2160 2 years ago
MEGAMAN:This is not correct. The leopard with four heads and wings on its back was symbolic of Greece during and after Alexander the Great from 331 BC to 168 BC
locobiz1 2 years ago
That was then. this is during the end times. so you should be telling william tapely this. go to my page. his videos are on my page
megaman2160 2 years ago
wtf?
HOLLOWMIHAI 2 years ago
I can't believe people actually believe this stuff...
LordBLB 2 years ago
thank you for this i have been studying researching a bit lately on the end times and antichrist etc thankyou not done watching all parts yet ;)
lullabyesmom 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The major world religions can be divided into two categories.
1) Abrahamic Religions
( ie., whose patriarch is Abraham like christianity,judaism,islam..et c)
2) Dharmic religions
( ie.,Religions which believes in dharma like Hinduism,buddism,jainism,sikhi sm.
etc)
The Advanced concepts like Dharma,Rebirth,karma,moksha..e tc are peculiar to dharmic religions. The Abrahamic religions do not have those Advanced concepts.
The Abrahamic religions cannot think beyond heaven/hell
princegoutham 2 years ago
i'm not big on like knowing the verses of the bible i have read it an i have listion to difernt preachers consrvertive an libral none of them relly made me mad acept for jhon hage that guy is relly just not good at all theres a vedio on my profile called the antichrist an signs or somthing an it saids that he will slander every god there is or somthing
churchofnewpaganism 3 years ago
My friend, we cannot quote the Bible if we can't show the verse. *smiles* If you ever want to talk about this more, you can always send me a message. Even in 6 months from now! I would love to talk about it more with you. I would be more than happy to show you verses for why I believe what I believe. It is really interesting too!
We should never take what a man says as fact, unless we can find it in the Bible!
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
in revalations the bible saids that there are orther gods who are good when it saids an the dragion shall give unto the beast a throne an he shall curse an say horroble things about every god there is whitch means there atleast more than one god possobly alot an the beast hates them
churchofnewpaganism 3 years ago
Would you please give me the actual Bible verse. *smiles* thank you!
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
David Asscherick has a gift of communication.
Nirky 3 years ago 2
the apostle paul was cruxified upside down the point is the bible is not the best place to get all of you'r information jesus even said do not beleive every thing that you are told test it first then acept it
churchofnewpaganism 3 years ago
Actually Paul said that. "Prove all things, hold fast that which is good". 1 Thess. 5:21. And John says "Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world." 1 John 4:1.
Nirky 3 years ago
According to Deuteronomy 13: 1-3, anyone who claims that we should worship/believe in other gods is incorrect! We should NOT believe it!
"Thou shalt have no other gods before me" - Exodus 20:3
We shouldn't have any other gods! NONE!
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
Yes, we are to test the spirits! What do we test them for? 1 John 4:1 "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world." Answer: to see if they are of God!!
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
"If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder, And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul." - Deuteronomy 13:1-3
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
One of my favorite verses for testing anything/anyone is found in Isaiah.
"To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." - Isaiah 8:20
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
newpaganism said: "..the point is the Bible is not the best place to get all of your information.."
"And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." - 2 Timothy 3: 15-17
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
The words of the Lord are pure words. ... Thou shalt keep them, 0 Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. - Psalm 12: 6, 7
The word of God ... liveth and abideth for ever. - 1 Peter 1:23
"Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away." - Matthew 24:35
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
it's all in the bible if you just read it also the paul who helped write the bible was not the good paul jesus freind ths was anorther paul his real name was saul of tarus he crully persicuted christions an pagans alike he was insane an clame jesus came to him but the real truth of the matter is he just made it up to trick christion an take them away from compleating jesus mission this is the paul who help write the bible
churchofnewpaganism 3 years ago
Did you know that Paul's Epistles are actually defined as "Scripture" by Peter the Apostle?
"And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction." 2 Peter 3:15-16
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
he saw the devinity in the femine he was a sharman because he heald pepole of sickness yhvh is a force who both male an female because he gave birth to the world an taught that all humans can be holy
churchofnewpaganism 3 years ago
If this is what you believe, why do you believe it? Where did you find this information? It isn't in the Bible! How do you know you can trust it? Believe in it?
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
thinks for posting my coments i admit i kind of went over bord but jesus was a pagan because he healed a sick person in front of a statue of the roman god of health when the jews rejected him from there sping he had a covern of 13 the 12 deciples an he made the 13th member as there leader he taught libral teachings he loved nature an slept out under the stars
churchofnewpaganism 3 years ago
you show you'r deceit that you shre with you'r evil god jahova who is molock an set an el the devil him self that wicked dragion of old who was thrown out of heaven for his hate deceitfullness greed an jelousy because you don't alow orthers to share there beliefs yet you serves you'r hatred an lies down every one elses throught there a speical place for you with jahova an all his angels in Hell!!!!!!
churchofnewpaganism 3 years ago
you will be thrown by you'r horns in to the fires of hell you'r tongs shall be forked as you are serpents you'r heads cut off an the godess shall once again be worshiped nature will be repaired abba shall be worshiped an loved an praised above every thing an every one therion that is an jesus christ shall rule for a thousand years
peace 666
churchofnewpaganism 3 years ago
I do not believe in a goddess. I don't know if I'm familiar with your theology, but I'm afraid it isn't Biblical by any means. I'll pray for you, my friend. Don't fall for the lies of men.
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
you are liers
an false prophets you worship wicked gods you pervert the teachings of jesus you are full of dead maan bones the hore that is you'r morther that you all came out of the church of the age of darkness an dith an law an hate
churchofnewpaganism 3 years ago
on what basis do you make these claims?! I'm just standing on the Word of God, my friend. I am just following what the Bible teaches and letting it explain/define itself. How is this perverting teachings of the Bible?
xpsalm119x 3 years ago
One of my favorite speakers!!! just bought the whole dvd series discover prophecy and lovin it!!
8IT4U 3 years ago 2
Nice. The mob needs the definition of "usurp."
MoistKumquat 3 years ago
If you relate the "facts" of "Collective Consciousness" to the "idea" of "Evolution".. what do you get ? Whats in our minds does it not manifest into our reality ? And what is "Evolution" besides men putting their heads together in order to build a "Society" ? Modern Day Evolution anyway .. Or Modern Day Evolving .. If you understand what it means hence to "Evolve" .. The process of "Going into the future" with an outlook of "Societal improvement" .. or "civilization development" ..
350motorheart 3 years ago