Basic logic left behind for this wrong analysis. Or do you actually claim, that all the footage from AFTER the impact was also faked? Strange enough then, that NONE of the steel constructs etc. was bended outwards at the position of the impact, but, as you expect when a plane hits the building, INWARDS. You can clearly see, that something entered the building from outside, a destruction nobody could EVER "simulate" with an inside detonation...
ya know, I used to buy into some of the truth movement...now i'm pretty sure they were terrorists. graphic overlays? really? ever watch the pixelization around a football on a digital tv. this isn't an analog shot. compressed digital video doesn't refresh all the data each frame, it only replaces the data that changes. what you are seeing are artifacts of digital video compression. this is an insult to everyone who lost their lives..no planes...wow.
No millions didn't see it live. You were fooled ya big dummy. Watch September clues and see who these "witnesses" were. If you really want the truth, look deep. They worked hard on fooling you sheep and most of you fell for it. Look at you guys, you not only elected bush but re-elected him. hahaha. You'll do the same for Obama the illegal. But the zion press says you're a birther, so you cling to the presses lies because a few zionist paid liars laughed and sent you p-nut brain the signal.
When a plane hit a steel ship, the plane would splatter all over the place. Watch planes hitting the super structure of an aircraft carrier. Look at the construction of the twin towers.They are incredibly dense with steel.Look at the concrete with steel re-enforced floors. How could the plan cut through the14in.outer column, and the whole length of the concrete, several, floors, the 36in.gurders in center, while still cutting through flooring, then out the side unblemished. hahaha. you stupid!
there is absolutely no logic used in the analysis of this video. What is wrong with you people. One point I feel I need to make is that the plane did not pass through a solid wall of structural steel. there is no building in the entire world that is made of a solid wall of structural steel. Buildings are made with steel beams. I.E., there is space between them. Look at WWII and the planes flying into ships, that is solid steel and the planes went into the ships!
@pk1225 "plane passes through a solid wall of structural steel without even slowing down at all."
If you think the walls of the WTC were made of solid structural steel you're dumb as shit. Plus, it proveably decelerates on the way in.
watch?v=GIZO-zY3Cug
You're fucking lying.
"that tin can plane"
A tin can made of aluminum alloy that weighs 350,000lbs, filled with explosives, that is designed to carry people around the world. Your bias is so obvious by the way you describe this stuff.
@Miko5000 Yeah, there's a lot of people who don't understand physics. It's a conservation of momentum problem, but the collision is an inelastic one. Neither the plane nor building is a particle or even a completely rigid body, and the plane's momentum is converted to heat and to breaking up the building's facade and itself. It won't bounce off and it's going to break through. Aside from that, I don't believe the vids of the impacts are fake.
Most of what u said was false. all you have to do on this video is watch the plane as it 1st enters the screen. you can see its computer graphics straight away. then seconds later it looks real. you need to watch a good quality copy to see it tho.
plus id like to add something, about the voice saying omg a plane crashed into the building etc. most people say its Hezarkhani himself. but its not true, it dont sound nothing like him. and where is your proof that its him? who said it was him?
How do you explain the millions who saw it happen live (myself) and the hundreds who saw it happen? 9/11 conspiracy theorists are the scum of the internet, along with trolls and pedophiles.
@ZZUnderground dude will you stop pretending to know stuff cause apparently you know nothing, if 9/11 was fake,what happened to the people that were on board, what happened to the planes. I don't think planes just vanish like a ghost, Shanksville is a good example because the plane was destroyed on impact and in the towers, the planes exploded and disintegrated
@Mr420woo its nice to no you can call a 14 year old kid a piece of shit you faggit , some big man thinking your so bad, to bad your girlfriend doesnt think your so "big"
the crowd doesnt scream until the explosion even though you can here it coming on the film ,surely someone would have noticed it and reacted,its human nature
Anti zionist proved to be true cowards and lying hypocrites due to their blatant inexperience the knowledge of Zionism. Were they playing with politics?
lefty sergeant is full of shit, he certainly isnt educated if he believes what he writes just a creative writing fan!. best stick to the commission report it was written for sheeple like you as bedtime reading. best bit of creative writing to ever be produced by your government. educated people dont need to lie about qualifications because they actually have them and dont need to mention it because they will show you using the knowledge and not try to quieten you by saying i know better! show me
how much does the plane decelerate when it hits the building. equal and opposite reaction. take the tower and strike the stationary airplane at 500mph...what would happen. no the plane wouldnt explode inside would it because the fuel would be all over the outside of the building along with bits of smashed airplane. The nose would be destroyed in the first ml/sec, some parts would enter taking lit fuel with it and it would continue to burn, lots would crash onto the street below. but it dont...
911 inside job....keep that in focus leftyseargeant...now back to your dayjob of disinforming the public....the pilot may have not realized....what drugs are you on man?
The aircraft does not appear to move relative to the frame because the camera is panning to track it. The camera is thus not moving relative to the plane. Thus, it seems to remain on a straight course. Notice that the camera continue panning to end up about where debris exits on the other side. this is consistant with Hezarkhani realizing he had lost track of the plane. The pilot may have not realized until quite near to the target that he was about to by-pass it, and thus the tight turn.
You filmed the towers from the wrong ferry. It chugged right on past the dock where the one Hezarkhani was on moors, to the right of Castle Clinton.
And the tower does not move to meet the plane. Hezarkhani did what anyone would instinctively do to film a plane. He panned to the right. You have nothing here.
The video itself proves that the camera panned just prior to impact. This causes the towers to be seen moving to the left even though the 'plane' keeps it's flightpath.
You obviously believe the Hezarkhani video to be real... so sad.
Youn obviously have worse skills than i in geometry. The camera pans right, the building moves to the left. This is to be expected. Were the plane on a straight path, it would also move somewhat to the left. But it was executing manoeuvers such that its motion would not be synchronized with the panning of the camera.
This makes as much sense as Killtown's brain-dead attempts to measure the smoke plume in End of Serenity.
Leave forensics to those of us who have some training.
My train ing in forensics and my training in special education botrh come into play here. I can tell that what is offered as evidence of a crime in all the 9/11 theories is not, and my training in special education helps me detect certain signs that advocates of a theory, such as Rosalie Grabel and her no-planers have some sort of mental issues.
The chances of standing exactly where Hezarkhani stood, holding the exact same model camera with all the same settings when the tide and currents exactly match those of the monent of impact are close to zero. However, several people have taken video from near the same point and the trees are not blocking or too low. It is not our fault that you and bsregistration have below-room-temp IQs and can't grasp this concept.
"The chances of standing exactly where Hezarkhani stood, holding the exact same model camera with all the same settings when the tide and currents exactly match those of the monent of impact are close to zero." But Hezarkhani could do this? What is he... super human? As per your personal attacks on me and bsregistration... you should stick to your version of poetry.
Again, simply post a video outlining your allegations concerning this vid and I'll gladly watch it.
@ZZUnderground You're a moron. The plane clearly isn't flying straight. It's banked with it's right wing significantly higher than it's left. If you honestly think a plane can still fly straight in that condition then there is no reasoning with you.
at around 2:10 the "plane" makes quite a twist to assume its entry angle. When we consider the plane is going 550 mph and a minimum of 5 degrees twist, I see a problem...
No wonder it happens on 911. Its all part of the plan, it cant be so coincidental tt terrorists plan it on e date similar to the emergency hotline no. 911
I believe the jerky camera movements are there, like you say, to give the appearance of the video being shot with a typical hand-held camera but also for emotional effect. If the audience thought it to be filmed by the media, it might not seem as shocking as when a citizen captures the moment on video. This is why, I believe, that many of the videos aired on and after 9/11 were claimed to be 'amateur' videos.
Thanks to people like yourself bsregistration Krokus69 PollenB simonshack spineyextra i can clearly see that what we where led to believe on tv was a big hoax....and a bad one at that.Good job
excellent!
2Xyousee 2 weeks ago
Basic logic left behind for this wrong analysis. Or do you actually claim, that all the footage from AFTER the impact was also faked? Strange enough then, that NONE of the steel constructs etc. was bended outwards at the position of the impact, but, as you expect when a plane hits the building, INWARDS. You can clearly see, that something entered the building from outside, a destruction nobody could EVER "simulate" with an inside detonation...
XYQW7 1 month ago
ya know, I used to buy into some of the truth movement...now i'm pretty sure they were terrorists. graphic overlays? really? ever watch the pixelization around a football on a digital tv. this isn't an analog shot. compressed digital video doesn't refresh all the data each frame, it only replaces the data that changes. what you are seeing are artifacts of digital video compression. this is an insult to everyone who lost their lives..no planes...wow.
kingt426 7 months ago
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA! "The footage should show the towers standing taller than depicted". How old are you , six?
saultrain 8 months ago
0:32
Dave7689 9 months ago
No millions didn't see it live. You were fooled ya big dummy. Watch September clues and see who these "witnesses" were. If you really want the truth, look deep. They worked hard on fooling you sheep and most of you fell for it. Look at you guys, you not only elected bush but re-elected him. hahaha. You'll do the same for Obama the illegal. But the zion press says you're a birther, so you cling to the presses lies because a few zionist paid liars laughed and sent you p-nut brain the signal.
sssssjjjj1 1 year ago
@sssssjjjj1
Right on !!
tgigunner 6 months ago
When a plane hit a steel ship, the plane would splatter all over the place. Watch planes hitting the super structure of an aircraft carrier. Look at the construction of the twin towers.They are incredibly dense with steel.Look at the concrete with steel re-enforced floors. How could the plan cut through the14in.outer column, and the whole length of the concrete, several, floors, the 36in.gurders in center, while still cutting through flooring, then out the side unblemished. hahaha. you stupid!
sssssjjjj1 1 year ago
there is absolutely no logic used in the analysis of this video. What is wrong with you people. One point I feel I need to make is that the plane did not pass through a solid wall of structural steel. there is no building in the entire world that is made of a solid wall of structural steel. Buildings are made with steel beams. I.E., there is space between them. Look at WWII and the planes flying into ships, that is solid steel and the planes went into the ships!
shorttimeonplanet 1 year ago
Great analysis. Plus, ya gotta love the way that tin can plane passes through a solid wall of structural steel without even slowing down at all.
If people can't see the problem with this video, I'd say the thinking thing just isn't their forte.
pk1225 1 year ago
@pk1225 "plane passes through a solid wall of structural steel without even slowing down at all."
If you think the walls of the WTC were made of solid structural steel you're dumb as shit. Plus, it proveably decelerates on the way in.
watch?v=GIZO-zY3Cug
You're fucking lying.
"that tin can plane"
A tin can made of aluminum alloy that weighs 350,000lbs, filled with explosives, that is designed to carry people around the world. Your bias is so obvious by the way you describe this stuff.
Miko5000 11 months ago
@Miko5000 Yeah, there's a lot of people who don't understand physics. It's a conservation of momentum problem, but the collision is an inelastic one. Neither the plane nor building is a particle or even a completely rigid body, and the plane's momentum is converted to heat and to breaking up the building's facade and itself. It won't bounce off and it's going to break through. Aside from that, I don't believe the vids of the impacts are fake.
belowthepovertyline 4 months ago
This is horrible analysis--so bad.
existenceisfake 1 year ago
he just moves the cam,so what?
If you would stand there and a plane is about to crash into the tower,would you not follow it with the cam to see what will happen?
Plattenlord 1 year ago
Most of what u said was false. all you have to do on this video is watch the plane as it 1st enters the screen. you can see its computer graphics straight away. then seconds later it looks real. you need to watch a good quality copy to see it tho.
plus id like to add something, about the voice saying omg a plane crashed into the building etc. most people say its Hezarkhani himself. but its not true, it dont sound nothing like him. and where is your proof that its him? who said it was him?
ChristianHolloway 1 year ago
How do you explain the millions who saw it happen live (myself) and the hundreds who saw it happen? 9/11 conspiracy theorists are the scum of the internet, along with trolls and pedophiles.
3marktheshark2 1 year ago
@3marktheshark2 millions who saw it "live" , saw it on TV numbnuts.
ssike0 1 year ago
WOW
stonee206 1 year ago
@ZZUnderground dude will you stop pretending to know stuff cause apparently you know nothing, if 9/11 was fake,what happened to the people that were on board, what happened to the planes. I don't think planes just vanish like a ghost, Shanksville is a good example because the plane was destroyed on impact and in the towers, the planes exploded and disintegrated
GoodGamer115 1 year ago
@GoodGamer115 well its obvious that you dont know shit because planes expecially the one in shanksville cannot disintigrate upon impact.
Mr420woo 1 year ago
@Mr420woo its nice to no you can call a 14 year old kid a piece of shit you faggit , some big man thinking your so bad, to bad your girlfriend doesnt think your so "big"
GoodGamer115 1 year ago
look at the infamous devil face at 0:27.....
demariojason 1 year ago
@demariojason ull see a thumbs up in the smoke at :32
Mr420woo 1 year ago
the crowd doesnt scream until the explosion even though you can here it coming on the film ,surely someone would have noticed it and reacted,its human nature
joiganja 2 years ago
watch the plane 1st come into screen,. it looks like a bad specail effect.
Dynamicdj 2 years ago
The perspective argument fails to take into account the angle of the video camera.
mekhanthos 2 years ago
The towers dont move to meet the plane, the camera is moving watch the towers relative to the building next to it.
mekhanthos 2 years ago
sharpen is not a mode but a transform that introduces anomalies that the author mistakenly uses as proof of overlays Sharpen does NOT enhance detail.
mekhanthos 2 years ago
lmao, I think this is a satire. Theres no way this is serious.
adkinsjr 2 years ago
lmao, u speak as though u were actually in new york to witness the plane...but u and 6billion other people only saw it on television.
FOBmuzungu 2 years ago
i still get it... This is like everyone wants to bellieve this conspiracy is true but everything thats pointed out in the film is bullshit man
nutcrakerz 3 years ago
Pay close attention to the left wing 0:22, where dose the end of the left wing go??
FormalScience 3 years ago
What the fuck? The left wing goes into the building along with the rest of the plane, to which it's attached.
dynamic717 3 years ago
Dude the freaking camera moves not the buildings hahahaha wtf!
nutcrakerz 3 years ago
lol of course it seems the camera moves but the plane should move with it, but it does not, thats the point dude :)
horror11 3 years ago
watch SEPTEMBER CLUES. wake up people.
hankwheels 3 years ago
Anti zionist proved to be true cowards and lying hypocrites due to their blatant inexperience the knowledge of Zionism. Were they playing with politics?
waddleduckie1 3 years ago
there is no plane and then there is no brain..
This video falls into the second category
it is not a layered video...
back your claim for layering
thebeatprophet2 3 years ago
Well done.
dontcensormebro 3 years ago
this video should be removed zz. it is complete bs and you know it. i debunked this a long time ago
thebeatprophet2 3 years ago
What are you on about?
I don't see any debunking proof among your 7 videos!
MandoMohan 3 years ago
Brilliant video.
sonofthedestroyer 3 years ago
lefty sergeant is full of shit, he certainly isnt educated if he believes what he writes just a creative writing fan!. best stick to the commission report it was written for sheeple like you as bedtime reading. best bit of creative writing to ever be produced by your government. educated people dont need to lie about qualifications because they actually have them and dont need to mention it because they will show you using the knowledge and not try to quieten you by saying i know better! show me
myzteron 3 years ago
how much does the plane decelerate when it hits the building. equal and opposite reaction. take the tower and strike the stationary airplane at 500mph...what would happen. no the plane wouldnt explode inside would it because the fuel would be all over the outside of the building along with bits of smashed airplane. The nose would be destroyed in the first ml/sec, some parts would enter taking lit fuel with it and it would continue to burn, lots would crash onto the street below. but it dont...
myzteron 3 years ago
minijimi- uh oh shill alert!
chibangin007 3 years ago
Common sense alert more like.
minijimi 3 years ago
something you dont have. moron
chibangin007 3 years ago
who put the smiley face in the smoke? Was that TV fakery too or just a chance?
minijimi 3 years ago
911 inside job....keep that in focus leftyseargeant...now back to your dayjob of disinforming the public....the pilot may have not realized....what drugs are you on man?
CairoGang 3 years ago
The aircraft does not appear to move relative to the frame because the camera is panning to track it. The camera is thus not moving relative to the plane. Thus, it seems to remain on a straight course. Notice that the camera continue panning to end up about where debris exits on the other side. this is consistant with Hezarkhani realizing he had lost track of the plane. The pilot may have not realized until quite near to the target that he was about to by-pass it, and thus the tight turn.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
You filmed the towers from the wrong ferry. It chugged right on past the dock where the one Hezarkhani was on moors, to the right of Castle Clinton.
And the tower does not move to meet the plane. Hezarkhani did what anyone would instinctively do to film a plane. He panned to the right. You have nothing here.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
The video itself proves that the camera panned just prior to impact. This causes the towers to be seen moving to the left even though the 'plane' keeps it's flightpath.
You obviously believe the Hezarkhani video to be real... so sad.
ZZUnderground 3 years ago
Youn obviously have worse skills than i in geometry. The camera pans right, the building moves to the left. This is to be expected. Were the plane on a straight path, it would also move somewhat to the left. But it was executing manoeuvers such that its motion would not be synchronized with the panning of the camera.
This makes as much sense as Killtown's brain-dead attempts to measure the smoke plume in End of Serenity.
Leave forensics to those of us who have some training.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
"Leave forensics to those of us who have some training."
Well now, forensics training for you must've gone out the window at some point.
The 'plane' keeping a straight path is very evident in this video... or were you not wearing your glasses?
Instead of your unwarranted rhetoric, simply post a video the confirms your allegations and we'll take it from there.
It's easy to be a critic but why not be a researcher as well? Perhaps your alleged forensics training could get a workout.
ZZUnderground 3 years ago
My train ing in forensics and my training in special education botrh come into play here. I can tell that what is offered as evidence of a crime in all the 9/11 theories is not, and my training in special education helps me detect certain signs that advocates of a theory, such as Rosalie Grabel and her no-planers have some sort of mental issues.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
'Special Ed' seems about right. If anything, it is you who has mental issues.
As I previously stated... post a video that confirms your allegations of my video not being accurate and we can move on from there.
The question is... can you do it? It's up to you. Prove me wrong and I'll admit that I'm wrong. I'm man enough to do so, guaranteed.
ZZUnderground 3 years ago
The chances of standing exactly where Hezarkhani stood, holding the exact same model camera with all the same settings when the tide and currents exactly match those of the monent of impact are close to zero. However, several people have taken video from near the same point and the trees are not blocking or too low. It is not our fault that you and bsregistration have below-room-temp IQs and can't grasp this concept.
leftysergeant 3 years ago
"The chances of standing exactly where Hezarkhani stood, holding the exact same model camera with all the same settings when the tide and currents exactly match those of the monent of impact are close to zero." But Hezarkhani could do this? What is he... super human? As per your personal attacks on me and bsregistration... you should stick to your version of poetry.
Again, simply post a video outlining your allegations concerning this vid and I'll gladly watch it.
ZZUnderground 3 years ago
@ZZUnderground You're a moron. The plane clearly isn't flying straight. It's banked with it's right wing significantly higher than it's left. If you honestly think a plane can still fly straight in that condition then there is no reasoning with you.
cleddy89 1 year ago
at around 2:10 the "plane" makes quite a twist to assume its entry angle. When we consider the plane is going 550 mph and a minimum of 5 degrees twist, I see a problem...
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
No wonder it happens on 911. Its all part of the plan, it cant be so coincidental tt terrorists plan it on e date similar to the emergency hotline no. 911
ArkitekturaMecanics 3 years ago
thank you for this video
911 fake
DiekoThaKurd 3 years ago
well, why this plane is GREY not dark-blue ???
it doesn't look like United...
Voltar78 3 years ago
amazing.
well done :)
horror11 3 years ago
The top one third of the Tower is missing in the Hezarkhani illusion. Compare!
PollenB 3 years ago
tower moves to left! awesome find!
youzurk 3 years ago
I believe the jerky camera movements are there, like you say, to give the appearance of the video being shot with a typical hand-held camera but also for emotional effect. If the audience thought it to be filmed by the media, it might not seem as shocking as when a citizen captures the moment on video. This is why, I believe, that many of the videos aired on and after 9/11 were claimed to be 'amateur' videos.
ZZUnderground 3 years ago
Thanks to people like yourself bsregistration Krokus69 PollenB simonshack spineyextra i can clearly see that what we where led to believe on tv was a big hoax....and a bad one at that.Good job
IeatRAWmeatAllWeek 3 years ago
Glad to know there are more folks opening their eyes out there. I appreciate your kind remarks.
ZZUnderground 3 years ago