Added: 2 years ago
From: hrppvi
Views: 6,582
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is very misleading information! The couples that are led to IVF have issues that are beyond Creighton and NaPro, and there chances of conceiving aren't high at all.

  • @1ssny I'm afraid you are misguided. CrMS and NaPro go deeper and beyond conventional methods which are, immoral, unhealthy, unsafe (for mother and child), highly expensive, and destructive terms of the dignity of the relationship between man and woman, where the children that result, deserve to be conceived through acts of integrity. As a FertilityCare Practitioner, I am honored to see the very opposite of your statement. It's very successful, and healthy -- on multiple dimensions.

  • @1ssny The charting reveals so much, that when our clients report back to their ob/gyn who sent them to IVF and either they did not take that route out of wisdom, or IVF failed, to show them the chart, they have no idea how to interpret it, nor explain the crucial role of cervical mucus, or PCOS. Bandaid approaches to menstrual problems lead to bandaid approaches to fertility problems.

  • Glory to God for warriors of the faith and bringing the culture of life and love into marriage and medicine. CrMS practitioner in training here, and so blessed with the invitation to join this mission!

  • Thank you for publishing and sharing this video on Youtube, there is some excellent information here. 

  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more