God has made this magnificent to show us his glorious power. Although I agree that we are arrogant I also believe that God may have made seem so small to magnify the significance of his love. he made us so small but his love for us is so big! also I believe that there is a reason for all the galaxies being so far apart. I think that he may have created other beings like us that are equally maybe even more important than us and i think he wouldn't want us to interfere with that (just a theory)
@sammywhythim777 I've thought of that too. It would make sense so he would have far more creations than people ever imagined (especially the ones that did not believe because of something like the universe being too big).
typical again ,no proof,just "hey trees are here so it must of been god,thecgreat god of gaps.it is eaxactly the same reasoning that had the ancient people believing that many gods exsted.they couldin't expalin something they said it must be somethe gods are responsible for.it, its2012 and people are still clnging to mysticism
Atheism is only an aswer to one question.DO you think that there is a god?-no, then you are an atheist. But many atheists are also sceptics realists and science junkies in a way :) and many are well educated. That is why in america there are so many religion nuts compared to other civilised countries it is because their education system sucks. You can only get a good education by having money and also having money is interpreted as being "blessed" since most americans are poor and undereducated.
@ItIsBadForU Actually there are plenty of college graduates in America that remain Christian. I personally became a basic nonbeliever when I was 17 and converted back when I was almost 22.. Atheism has no essence to it, I think a god had to have created everything because humans exist. We are unique in our sense of morality, logic, and thirst for further knowledge in general. I can't imagine an intelligent animal such as us not having a tendency to believe in gods. We are like gods
@martiandog89 we are not unique. Chimpansees has a selfawareness which has been proven as well as orangutans and they use tools, share foor, and make friendship bonds that last a lifetime. They also create new and unique ways to survive and they teach it to their kids. Orangutans is another species that is selfaware. But only 3species in total at the moment. But if god had to create everything then who made god? Empathy was also present in early humans such as Homo erectus.
@ItIsBadForU I mean that we are like Gods in our sense of intelligence. Of course Gods would resemble us though if we created them :) I think it matters whether or not you think the universe as we observe is truth (is morality true?) or is it just a virus' observation that will eventually die while the universe will continue..? or will it die too? Humans can't make sense of these concepts, so gods have been created in an attempt. However, there is only one God of Abraham who creates with words.
@martiandog89 so what you are saying is that you don't believe in the god of Koran? You believe that the god is from Koran but the Koran was made by man`so it isn't the word of god since it was man made?
When people die they just die stop to exist. I think that that gives people the drive to make the most of their life and to explore the universe. If they want to adopt a god then by all means I just don't want that their perception of gods is forced in schools and on children.
If we say that the universe was created for "us" in terms of "people on Earth," then I'd have to agree with you on all points, but if by "us" we mean to "people in the universe," including all possible extraterrestrial life, then one could, hypothetically, argue that the universe was created for life to thrive in, and the continuous creation and destruction is by design to allow a variety of new life forms to exist, replacing older ones. (I'm not saying it happened that way, just could have.)
I'm an atheist, and you didn't prove there is no god, although I agree with every other thing you say ... also it's not up to an atheist to disprove someone else claims ... I claim the atheists believe in an invisible little man named Fred ... I call on anyone to prove he doesn't exist???
How can anyone dare to say that God doesnt exsist?! And even worse - how can anyone dare to claim that there is proof that God doesnt exsist?! Especially when the fact is that there is so much proof that God does exsist! LOOK AROUND YOU! If there was no God, everything and everyone you see would not exsist. Even YOU would not exsist! Science is not the answer. Science can only do so much, but God can do anything and everything! Athiests are getting more and more ignorant.
@sorienor I think it is strangely moronic that you feel entitled to let everyone know that you "know" that there is no God. Human existence and interactions have failed to shed any wonder or delight in your life to the point where you truly believe the question of "why?" is stupid, yet im certain you could never give any kind of answer to the questions of "why does anything exist?". Its pathetic that so many people think people like you are "open minded". Id bet my $5 life that god is. you suck.
harry potter is in a book... does that make HIM real?
let me ask a question. how many times has the bible been re-written? enough times for them to claim that they re-write it to "keep up with the times". now if the bible is "the word" why change it? shouldn't it be set in concrete and adheard to regardless?
basicly that just proves in itself that its just a story written by a man with little knowledge of anything logical or sensical.
@28804ecorrell Fuck god.. there is no god.. !! u stop bullshitting.. !! m fed up with lame people like u ... Servants of god.. !! God is just an imagination !!..If u want to, u can keep on believing it until death.. but then also u are getting nowhere.. !! Assquads !!
@28804ecorrell typical thiest answer ,witch is no real answer ,the old look around you it had to be god when science has already explianded all this.there is no REAL proof of god,and if god does exist he does not intrude on the laws of physics( nor does he answer prayers) so if he does exist ,he is pretty useless and irrelevent
@28804ecorrell You fail to try and prove that there are any higher powers. Simply saying "God exists because he does," doesn't prove a point, it makes you look ignorant. Think of some valid shit, then come back.
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This video is one small argument, among many, that convince me that a personal god does not exist (not that we have the burden of proof). It's not however, proof of the absence of a deistic god. We may never have proof either way.
@TheBiAtheist I agree. The title should be less strongly worded. Your mention that there is no evidence either way reminded me of a really good video by Not1delusion.
11. There's no evidence either way
/watch?v=hwXyDLNTKWM
Uploaded August 26, 2010 by Not1delusion
He has another video which is possibly my favorite of all time
@TheBiAtheist Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, if you are going to make a claim without any evidence then that is evidence of absence. If I say there is a dragon in my garage, you look, and all you see is ladders paint ect. that means there is absence of evidence, therefore evidence of absence. So that quote is really stupid. Absence of evidence IS evidence of absence until evidence arises we assume absence - Occam's Razor
@theBartone9119 I understand your point completely and I agree with you. The fact is I can't justify making a claim that I can't verify. A metaphysical dragon may in fact exist in the garage (as preposterous as it sounds) but that doesn't mean I'd automatically believe that one exists. I don't believe in anything supernatural, but I can't claim to know either way.
@TheBiAtheist Nobody knows anything for sure you. just go with most likely.
If you see a race and one dog is in tip top shape and the other one has a busted leg, you don't know with 100% certainty that the one with the busted leg is going lose, but it's the most logical option to go with and it's logical to make the claim "The dog with the busted leg is going to lose" even if it's not certain.
@theBartone9119 You should watch some of 'TheraminTrees' videos if you haven't already. I'm sure you'd like them, especially his 'There are no gods' series. I wish I was half as brilliant and well-spoken as he is.
@TheBiAtheist ,well it is impossible to prove a negative,loike if I say they are many gods and the are rainbow coloured,but also invisble and live in a different plain of existence that we cannot measure,feel or test,prove now prove me wrong.impossoble.it is up to the people claiming that there is a god ot give REAL proof of god.
@TheBiAtheist There is no proof that there is a God in the tangible way you want it. You want to see a christian perform a miracle or for God to prove himself to you through wrath or miracle? The bible gives evidence that it is obvious that he made everything.. now I wouldn't say its actually "obvious" anymore, but I find it funny how everyone accepts the big bang theory as it is scientifically presented (ignores the law of cause and effect), then proceed with that there is probably no god. lol?
@martiandog89 "The bible gives evidence that it is obvious that he made everything."
The Bible has to meet its burden of proof before I can accept it as evidence. I have no more reason to believe the Bible is the 'word of God' than I do the Quran. Watch the series I promote in the sidebar of my channel to understand why your appeal to the Bible is unconvincing to me. Thanks for your comment nonetheless.
@TheRoninshaman I guess you should watch the video. "beyond comprehension" only refers to the numbers involved, which are completely outside human experience.
However it is hardly beyond comprehension. We comprehend quite a large bit of it.
@TheRoninshaman If you think the universe was created just so humans could exist then you are arrogant and ignorant. The Universe is 13,7 billion years old, human beings have only been around for 200,000 years. This means that we have been around for only 0.0000685% of the time the Universe has. 99% of all species to lived on this planet have gone extinct. We should thank our lucky stars we are here (literally) not God. We are all made of Star Dust, stars had to die for you to be here,
Wikipedia says the tail of the tadpole galaxy is 280,000 light years long, not 280,000,000. I am always interested in hearing how people lost their religion. Thanks for sharing.
@WarmWeatherGuy Have you watched the playlist 'Why I Am No Longer A Christian' by user Evid3nc3? If you haven't, I promise you it will be your favorite one.
@TheBiAtheist Good call on Evid3nc3. His series is awesome. It seems that people get their religion when they are young and gullible. When we are young we are so gullible that we believe ANYTHING, even tooth fairies and Santa. Another way people get religion is when they are emotionally distraught (think suicidal). Contrast this to how people lose their religion: Education, reason, thinking and reading the Bible. It's interesting, isn't it?
@WarmWeatherGuy His religious life was very similar to mine. We both grew up in the Assemblies of God, went to Royal Rangers, and were both 'filled with the Holy Spirit' at a young age. You wouldn't have been able to convince me that I was wrong. I still think about how I could've never gotten out of it.
He is greater than all language, and no statement can express Him. Indeed, if any statement could express Him, He would be less than human speech which could by such statement comprehend and gather up all that He is. All our thoughts about Him will be less than He, and our loftiest utterances will be trivialities in comparison with Him.
Here, and in all our meditations upon the qualities and content of God, we pass beyond our power of fit conception, nor can human eloquence put forth a power commensurate with His greatness. At the contemplation and utterance of His majesty all eloquence is rightly dumb, all mental effort is feeble. For God is greater than mind itself. His greatness cannot be conceived. Nay, could we conceive of His greatness He would be less than the human mind which could form the conception.
@r9670712 What a giant, meaningless, steaming hot load of bullshit. Thanks for playing though, you don't get to state whatever you want and pretend it is fact.
@sorienor You evidently missed the point of my comments, which was to convey that there is not, cannot and will never be 'evidence' of a supreme, divine and eternal being. Because there being 'evidence' of an eternal, infinite God is contradictory. Maybe those of you set out on the intent of disproving God should go back to the bible where it's made clear He is outside of our scientific theories and the universe He created. It's very simple. The evidence is in your soul.
Actually the bible says we are created in the image of god. This includes our intellect and free will this includes our logical mind. so dont use the bible to prove your points
Yes, Where is God, with all this Hate, Anger, Harsh Reality ? My Grandfather Passed in 1979. Gentle - Simple Man. He was only 60, He got a Bad Cold, Never Recovered. I have not heard or seen him since. Maybe " Life " was an Accident ? or a Higher Beings ( Aliens to Us ), Who Knows ? If there is a " GOD " , I have MANY Questions for Him, Her, It ? Thank You
Each of which is so improbable that before it would occur the Sun would have ceased to be a main sequence star and incinerated the earth. And they calculate the probability of the evolution of the human genome to be somewhere between 4 to the -180th power to the 110,000 power and 4 to the -360th power to the 110,000 power. So if evolution did occur on this planet it was literally a miracle and therefore evidence for the existence of God.
@trechbodyboardin That is all complete, total bullshit. You can't have odds of something you only have 1 sample of. Sorry. Those are all numbers literally pulled out of someone's ass.
@trechbodyboardin yes because some unexplained, unexplainable all-powerful being suddenly *poof* everything into existance by magic just makes so much fucking sense..
@trechbodyboardin by calculating the probability of ANY eventuality you will end up disproving its own existence. Just because it is improbable DOES NOT MEAN that God is responsible. That is a major cop out that crumbles under the weakest amount of thought.
"27. And (remember) the Day when the Zalim (wrong-doer, oppressor, polytheist, etc.) will bite at his hands, he will say: "Oh! Would that I had taken a path with the Messenger ( Muhammad ).
28. "Ah! Woe to me! Would that I had never taken so-and-so as a friend!
29. "He indeed led me astray from the Reminder (this Qur'an) after it had come to me. And Shaitan (Satan) is ever a deserter to man in the hour of need.""
"9. See they not what is before them and what is behind them, of the heaven and the earth? If We will, We shall sink the earth with them, or cause a piece of the heaven to fall upon them. Verily, in this is a sign for every faithful believer that [believes in the Oneness of Allah], and turns to Allah (in all affairs with humility and in repentance)."
"4. Those who disbelieve say: "This (the Qur'an) is nothing but a lie that he (Muhammad ) has invented, and others have helped him at it, so that they have produced an unjust wrong (thing) and a lie."
5. And they say: "Tales of the ancients, which he has written down, and they are dictated to him morning and afternoon."
6. Say: "It (this Qur'an) has been sent down by Him (Allah) Who knows the secret of the heavens and the earth. Truly, He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.""
"31. And those who disbelieve say: "We believe not in this Qur'an nor in that which was before it," but if you could see when the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers, etc.) will be made to stand before their Lord, how they will cast the (blaming) word one to another! Those who were deemed weak will say to those who were arrogant: "Had it not been for you, we should certainly have been believers!"
@emaan456 Oh would you fucking stop already. No one gives one little tiny shit what is written in your 1400 year old book of lies, fairy tales and bullshit.
it's all fucking bullshit. Every word. Either come up with an original thought or, Thor help me you'll be blocked.
see evolutionist and athiests dont want there to be a god because of their lifestyle their sins they dont want to give that up look at adolf hittler another athiest who decided to kill all the jews because once you dont believe then theres no reason to obey law or be faithfull to your spouse because the bible doesnt matter all evolution is doing is saying theres no meaning to life its just accidental thats why we have crime rate sky rocketed since they started teaching evolution as fact not
@cjguitarist100 LOL you're such a tool. First, and also completely irrelevantly, Hitler was a self-professed Christian whose antisemitism was fueled by 100's of years of christian dogma.
Second, the rest of your post is just plain old-fashioned bullshit, fueled by your own personal hatred and bigotry. Not a single thing there is accurate.
Please explain to me how you can be moral following the teachers of the misogynistic, mass-murdering, jealous, tyrannical monster of a god in the bible?
no if you can believe god wasnt created then you cant believe that energy wasnt created either i mean god is energy man see evolutionists tell you bogus stuff that just doesnt add up and further more they dont tell you all the flaws there is in evolution that has been prooven evolution itself is a belief like religion if you cant scientificaly proove it its not science
@cjguitarist100 We have a word for energy, "energy". No need re-label it "god" to fit the maniacal rantings of illiterate bronze-aged desert nomads.
Because having everything created out of nothing by magic makes oh so much more sense the provable science.
and despite the LIES you've been told by your fellow sheep, evolution is not only provable, but has been proven. Sorry. You've been deceived. Ask them why they have to lie for Jesus?
"17. Do they not look at the camels, how they are created? 18. And at the heaven, how it is raised? 19. And at the mountains, how they are rooted and fixed firm? 20. And at the earth, how it is spread out? 21. So remind them (O Muhammad), you are only a one who reminds. 22. You are not a dictator over them. 23. Save the one who turns away and disbelieves 24. Then Allah will punish him with the greatest punishment. 25. Verily, to Us will be their return;" Al-Quran:88
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
HUMAN-CHIMP DNA MYTH: The actual similarity is between 70-87% not 99.8% as commonly believed. The original research stating 99.8% similarity was based on ignoring contradicting evidence. Read the article, "Evaluating the Human-Chimp DNA Myth--New Research Data" at the Institute for Creation Research Site. The similarities are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes, rather than chance. Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC is similar to seeing an earthquake churn-up a few well-formed rocks and concluding from this that earthquakes, if given enough time, can construct a building. Macro-evolutionists take the little things here and there produced by chance and extrapolate it into something extraordinary and then call it science. Notice, all evolutionists begin with a complete species. They don't begin their theory with partially-evolved species, with partially-evolved tissues and organs.
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. For every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Yeah but you cant prove that. You sniveling fools think that youy can call it a fact without evidence bc someone that calls themselves a teacher, expert or authority said its a fact. So why dont u come clean and admit that you just believe so and so that told you that it was a fact.
I could be wrong and wait for anyone to debate me on this. I guaranteed ull be humiliated for ur own good
The bible says that everything was created by God, meaning that everything has a creator, why does God not have one? If God was not created, then nothing can have a creator. God is said to be the source of everything, which means he created time and space, so he must have existed outside time and space. If everything comes from God, then God lacks everything he creates, like moral, or logic, if God comes from God, then God does not exist. If God is the cause of everything, God is void.
@bloodclots99 as well, if he is spaceless and timeless, then he cannot act, and he is not there. Point that out whenever a theist says God is above being made of matter.
Science and reason = human curiosity, research and progress. Religion = dogma, blind acceptance (of old fables) and dullness of the mind. It's only those who haven't had the chance or the will to study science properly who still really believe in religion.
"7. And He it is Who has created the heavens and the earth in six Days and His Throne was on the water, that He might try you, which of you is the best in deeds. But if you were to say to them: "You shall indeed be raised up after death," those who disbelieve would be sure to say, "This is nothing but obvious magic. "
@emaan456 You're still at it, aren't you!! You seem desperate - desperate to keep spouting inane rubbish from a third rate book of man-made fairy tales. Thought you would have learned a bit of a lesson from our exchanges over the past couple of days (which would really amuse anyone with an open mind who reads them). Can't you see that no one gives a damn about you or your fatuous posts?
I admire sorienor because he puts it much more succinctly than I do. How do you feel about that?
@Forthright1 I feel great about it as I am doing my work and you ppl are doing exactly what is waiting for you hereafter.
Whatever you said about Quran shows your poor study and research in the time of 'touch'.
Do read my reply to sorienor that is for all ppl who are disbelieving....What I can say in favor of you ppl is "May ALLAH show all of you the right path" but I know who seeks,Finds!
@Forthright1 "4. And a great number of towns (their population) We destroyed (for their crimes). Our torment came upon them (suddenly) by night or while they were sleeping for their afternoon rest.
5. No cry did they utter when Our Torment came upon them but this: "Verily, we were Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers, etc.)".
@Forthright1 "16. Do you feel secure that He, Who is over the heaven (Allah), will not cause the earth to sink with you, then behold it shakes (as in an earthquake)?
17. Or do you feel secure that He, Who is over the heaven (Allah), will not send against you a violent whirlwind? Then you shall know how (terrible) has been My Warning?
18. And indeed those before them belied (the Messengers of Allah), then how terrible was My denial (punishment)?"
@emaan456 Have you read Richard Carrier's article 'Epicurus vs Mohammed' yet? I recommended it for you more than a week ago. Google it and read it with an open mind (if at all possible for you). It'll enlighten you big time.
@Forthright1 "14. Say: "Shall I take as a Wali (helper, protector, etc.) any other than Allah, the Creator of the heavens and the earth? And it is He Who feeds but is not fed." Say: "Verily, I am commanded to be the first of those who submit themselves to Allah (as Muslims)." And be not you of the Mushrikun [polytheists, pagans, idolaters and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah].
15. Say: "I fear, if I disobey my Lord, the torment of a Mighty Day.""
In my humble opinion, this does not prove that there is no God, the bible explains how "we" where conceived and how "he" managed our history, but a person that knows about bible and stuff like this can see that we are not "superstars" in this vaste universe, what we know is our story; still this is my huble opinion, but sure as always, pictures of hiden places in the universe are always amazing and beautiful! indeed!
"But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance."
so if each day is or could be a thousand years then what creation took like 7 thousand years? possibly could be more. point is you can't disprove the bible. nor prove it till you die.
@jpest17 I don't have to disprove the bible. Not only is there no reason to think any of it is true, but many of the stories and actions of the god character are morally reprehensible. Not to mention the core of the new testament - vicarious redemption - is simply the pinnacle of immorality.
one question, how could the Universe have been created by an expoltion with no cause? think about it. if 0+0=0 how could there be any thing to make the Universe. ether A: there was some type of super natuaral creator or B: there was no Big Bang at all
@xPray2die2dayx OR the total energy of the universe is zero, which is actually the prevailing thought in cosmology at the moment. So the universe did not "come" from nothing, but was simply the splitting of nothing into equal but opposite components..which fits perfectly with all known physics.
@sorienor but that puts most of what we know about physics in defiance. if i am not crushing a grape in my hand (there is no grape in my hand to start with) then nothing is splitting in my hand so there is a "chance" there will be a smashed grape in my hand? There could have been another way the Universe was made other than the Big Bang that does not have to be supernatural... maybe, but im just pointing out how clueless the Big Bang [ hypothesis ] is
@ImagineThersNoHeaven Electricity can not exist outside a medium to transport it. Heat similarly balances to the environment. As soon as the brain dies, the "energy" all dissipates.
"DO explain the N.D.E. of many many people."
NDE's are demonstrable and repeatable in test pilots in centrifuges.
NDE seem to be a completely natural, biological phenomenon. Magic has never been a solution to a problem, and doubtful it is for NDE's.
Simply stating you see the "soul" does not make it so!
@ImagineThersNoHeaven dude, Santa clause and the rain deer's were real to you when u were like 3 or 5 years old,,but now u grew,.god and religion is just a sophisticated lie for stupid adults whose minds are too simple to understand the universe,,, the world would be much much better without religion,,,the government and pastors are just making money from your beliefs..i feel sorry for people who still believe in fairy tales..i believe in science,,the founder of medication that saves lives,,,,
Energy, just so you know, is defined as "the ability to do work". There is no such thing as "energy" that floats around and exists like in fucking star trek.
I wouldn't be so condescending if you weren't so willfully ignorant.
"37. And they said: "Why is not a sign sent down to him from his Lord?" Say: "Allah is certainly Able to send down a sign, but most of them know not."
38. There is not a moving (living) creature on earth, nor a bird that flies with its two wings, but are communities like you. We have neglected nothing in the Book, then unto their Lord they (all) shall be gathered.
39. Those who reject Our Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, etc.) are deaf and dumb in darkness."
@emaan456 Don't you have your own brain that you could possibly use to contribute to a conversation rather than keep quoting from a boring man-made book full of repetitions, abrogations and incitement of violence? And regarding your risible claim that quran mentions the big bang, I suggest that you do a bit of real research and you'll find that Epicurus made a number of astonishingly accurate scientific predictions (including the nature of the universe) about 9 centuries before mohammed!
@Forthright1 LOL....First of all your claims are wrong about Quran and its not scientific at all to use such words for any thing you dont have your personal research.
And if you do have your research related to that thing then you should ask question rather blaming blindly....
Quran made a simple challenge to mankind....why dont you ppl accept it in order to prove yourself?
@emaan456 Without the use of overused, unintelligent abbreviations like 'LOL', may I point out that you would help yourself communicate more lucidly by using correct English like knowing when to use "it's" rather than "its" and just structuring your sentences a bit better. That aside, quranic incitements of violence are evident in its verses 9:29 and 4:89 (if you've ever bothered to understand it with translation) and abrogations in 2:106 and 16:101. Talk about 'blaming blindly'!
@Forthright1 Related to 9:29 reference from Quran.Well its a law for Islamic government how to treat the non believers(tax) and war related commands.Its a common practice to pick verses out of context from Quran.This is the book of miracles one can find Islamic jurisprudence,economic laws,guidance,scientific discoveries,future predictions and lot more that we(Muslims) dint discover as yet.The key to get the guidance from it is to become pious and neutral Then see how its magic works on you:)
@emaan456 You don't seem to learn, do you? You're repeating the same English mistakes (basic) in all of your comments. Come on man, make an effort and learn some proper language skills! Your English is so bad! Coming to the real point, what contradictory and hilarious things you say! So, it's right for quran (9:29) to tell muslims to fight and kill non-muslims and impose jizya upon conquering them? How barbaric! What more evidence do you need that this evil book preaches violence?
@Forthright1 You are not replying in my native language right?
I am replying you in your language so who is better in learning...one can easily guess.
If Islamic govt takes tax from non-Muslims then its for their security and services that are offered for living and enjoying all types of facilities including freedom of belief.Whats wrong and barbaric in it btw?
Becoming Muslim goes purely in your benefit but if you chose other then you have a right to enjoy this life.
@emaan456 What makes you think that you're 'replying in my language'? English is my second language, Urdu first. You're used to making assumptions, aren't you? Assuming something without bothering to research is a prime hallmark of lack of intelligence. Frankly, you have exhibited that in all of your comments so far.
@emaan456 Even though you continue to make ludicrous statements like 'after islam no other religion will be accepted from ppl', and the fact that you have had the cheek to call people who do not believe in islam 'negative-minded' and 'diseased' (attributes that would better suit you and anyone else who follows any religion blindly without investigating) earlier, peace to you too.
Also, there is no need to tell us to study quran; of course I have and, therefore, I'm telling you what it says.
@emaan456 It's so amusing how you casually defend the violence preached in quran's 9:29 by saying things like 'well it's a law for islamic government how to treat non believers (tax) and war related commands' when this verse clearly tells muslims to fight and kill people just because they don't believe in allah and islam (without any provocation!). Your 'picking verses out of context' excuse is so old and so sucks. Then you talk about neutrality in order to understand it!!! How hypocritical.
@Forthright1 I have given you clear proof that the verse is related to war and now you are arguing by making false points.All religions and govt have their laws of war killing humans and leaving none.
Islam gave the laws in which women,children,old and sick ppl are not allowed to kill.During Prophet hood all wars were imposed on muslims.In imposed war muslims kill only men(attackers).
From the same thing,every person conceives different according to his mentality.
I completely agree.
DJSRF 4 days ago
There is a God and there is a devil if you think that God is smaller than the galaxies you are obviously thinking that God is as weak as man is.
SuperBebegun 3 weeks ago
God has made this magnificent to show us his glorious power. Although I agree that we are arrogant I also believe that God may have made seem so small to magnify the significance of his love. he made us so small but his love for us is so big! also I believe that there is a reason for all the galaxies being so far apart. I think that he may have created other beings like us that are equally maybe even more important than us and i think he wouldn't want us to interfere with that (just a theory)
sammywhythim777 3 weeks ago
@sammywhythim777 I've thought of that too. It would make sense so he would have far more creations than people ever imagined (especially the ones that did not believe because of something like the universe being too big).
martiandog89 2 weeks ago
typical again ,no proof,just "hey trees are here so it must of been god,thecgreat god of gaps.it is eaxactly the same reasoning that had the ancient people believing that many gods exsted.they couldin't expalin something they said it must be somethe gods are responsible for.it, its2012 and people are still clnging to mysticism
mandrillx 4 weeks ago
Atheism is only an aswer to one question.DO you think that there is a god?-no, then you are an atheist. But many atheists are also sceptics realists and science junkies in a way :) and many are well educated. That is why in america there are so many religion nuts compared to other civilised countries it is because their education system sucks. You can only get a good education by having money and also having money is interpreted as being "blessed" since most americans are poor and undereducated.
ItIsBadForU 1 month ago
@ItIsBadForU Actually there are plenty of college graduates in America that remain Christian. I personally became a basic nonbeliever when I was 17 and converted back when I was almost 22.. Atheism has no essence to it, I think a god had to have created everything because humans exist. We are unique in our sense of morality, logic, and thirst for further knowledge in general. I can't imagine an intelligent animal such as us not having a tendency to believe in gods. We are like gods
martiandog89 2 weeks ago
@martiandog89 we are not unique. Chimpansees has a selfawareness which has been proven as well as orangutans and they use tools, share foor, and make friendship bonds that last a lifetime. They also create new and unique ways to survive and they teach it to their kids. Orangutans is another species that is selfaware. But only 3species in total at the moment. But if god had to create everything then who made god? Empathy was also present in early humans such as Homo erectus.
ItIsBadForU 2 weeks ago
@ItIsBadForU I mean that we are like Gods in our sense of intelligence. Of course Gods would resemble us though if we created them :) I think it matters whether or not you think the universe as we observe is truth (is morality true?) or is it just a virus' observation that will eventually die while the universe will continue..? or will it die too? Humans can't make sense of these concepts, so gods have been created in an attempt. However, there is only one God of Abraham who creates with words.
martiandog89 2 weeks ago
@martiandog89 so what you are saying is that you don't believe in the god of Koran? You believe that the god is from Koran but the Koran was made by man`so it isn't the word of god since it was man made?
When people die they just die stop to exist. I think that that gives people the drive to make the most of their life and to explore the universe. If they want to adopt a god then by all means I just don't want that their perception of gods is forced in schools and on children.
ItIsBadForU 2 weeks ago
ok science no proof. dumb shit there's no proof either way.
bewhite08 1 month ago
I see no proof, but only the wonderful works of God. Go on atheists, come and get me. -:)
JellayToasT 1 month ago
If we say that the universe was created for "us" in terms of "people on Earth," then I'd have to agree with you on all points, but if by "us" we mean to "people in the universe," including all possible extraterrestrial life, then one could, hypothetically, argue that the universe was created for life to thrive in, and the continuous creation and destruction is by design to allow a variety of new life forms to exist, replacing older ones. (I'm not saying it happened that way, just could have.)
ShawnRavenfire 1 month ago
I'm an atheist, and you didn't prove there is no god, although I agree with every other thing you say ... also it's not up to an atheist to disprove someone else claims ... I claim the atheists believe in an invisible little man named Fred ... I call on anyone to prove he doesn't exist???
Exactly!!!!!!!!!!!!
damplyons 1 month ago
How can anyone dare to say that God doesnt exsist?! And even worse - how can anyone dare to claim that there is proof that God doesnt exsist?! Especially when the fact is that there is so much proof that God does exsist! LOOK AROUND YOU! If there was no God, everything and everyone you see would not exsist. Even YOU would not exsist! Science is not the answer. Science can only do so much, but God can do anything and everything! Athiests are getting more and more ignorant.
28804ecorrell 1 month ago
@28804ecorrell wow..I don't even know where to start with this paragraph of incoherent moronic ramblings.
God is a just pretend. Grow up, really, time to join us in reality.
sorienor 1 month ago 13
@sorienor I think it is strangely moronic that you feel entitled to let everyone know that you "know" that there is no God. Human existence and interactions have failed to shed any wonder or delight in your life to the point where you truly believe the question of "why?" is stupid, yet im certain you could never give any kind of answer to the questions of "why does anything exist?". Its pathetic that so many people think people like you are "open minded". Id bet my $5 life that god is. you suck.
martiandog89 3 weeks ago
@28804ecorrell
harry potter is in a book... does that make HIM real?
let me ask a question. how many times has the bible been re-written? enough times for them to claim that they re-write it to "keep up with the times". now if the bible is "the word" why change it? shouldn't it be set in concrete and adheard to regardless?
basicly that just proves in itself that its just a story written by a man with little knowledge of anything logical or sensical.
essenceimagery 1 month ago
@28804ecorrell So dumb. Soooo dumb.
Nopestillnogod 1 month ago
@28804ecorrell Fuck god.. there is no god.. !! u stop bullshitting.. !! m fed up with lame people like u ... Servants of god.. !! God is just an imagination !!..If u want to, u can keep on believing it until death.. but then also u are getting nowhere.. !! Assquads !!
Demigod368 1 month ago
@28804ecorrell typical thiest answer ,witch is no real answer ,the old look around you it had to be god when science has already explianded all this.there is no REAL proof of god,and if god does exist he does not intrude on the laws of physics( nor does he answer prayers) so if he does exist ,he is pretty useless and irrelevent
mandrillx 4 weeks ago
@28804ecorrell You fail to try and prove that there are any higher powers. Simply saying "God exists because he does," doesn't prove a point, it makes you look ignorant. Think of some valid shit, then come back.
TheEnjoiPandolin 3 weeks ago
@28804ecorrell God doesn't exsist, come back to reality !
YannickEntertainment 3 weeks ago
@28804ecorrell u my friend r so fucking stupid and fucking dumb that if there is any god... god him self will hate your dumb ass
123456aria 2 weeks ago
@28804ecorrell lol. no.
stfuxcali 1 week ago
@28804ecorrell it is sad that ignorant people like you are taking up my air
IdentifiedInfidel 1 week ago
The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This video is one small argument, among many, that convince me that a personal god does not exist (not that we have the burden of proof). It's not however, proof of the absence of a deistic god. We may never have proof either way.
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago 7
@TheBiAtheist I agree. The title should be less strongly worded. Your mention that there is no evidence either way reminded me of a really good video by Not1delusion.
11. There's no evidence either way
/watch?v=hwXyDLNTKWM
Uploaded August 26, 2010 by Not1delusion
He has another video which is possibly my favorite of all time
12. Some things must be believed to be seen
/watch?v=xErHSR9M5I8
Uploaded September 19, 2010 by Not1delusion
WarmWeatherGuy 1 month ago
@WarmWeatherGuy Thanks. Those were great videos.
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago
@TheBiAtheist Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, if you are going to make a claim without any evidence then that is evidence of absence. If I say there is a dragon in my garage, you look, and all you see is ladders paint ect. that means there is absence of evidence, therefore evidence of absence. So that quote is really stupid. Absence of evidence IS evidence of absence until evidence arises we assume absence - Occam's Razor
theBartone9119 1 month ago
@theBartone9119 I understand your point completely and I agree with you. The fact is I can't justify making a claim that I can't verify. A metaphysical dragon may in fact exist in the garage (as preposterous as it sounds) but that doesn't mean I'd automatically believe that one exists. I don't believe in anything supernatural, but I can't claim to know either way.
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago
@TheBiAtheist Nobody knows anything for sure you. just go with most likely.
If you see a race and one dog is in tip top shape and the other one has a busted leg, you don't know with 100% certainty that the one with the busted leg is going lose, but it's the most logical option to go with and it's logical to make the claim "The dog with the busted leg is going to lose" even if it's not certain.
theBartone9119 1 month ago
@theBartone9119 You should watch some of 'TheraminTrees' videos if you haven't already. I'm sure you'd like them, especially his 'There are no gods' series. I wish I was half as brilliant and well-spoken as he is.
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago
@TheBiAtheist ,well it is impossible to prove a negative,loike if I say they are many gods and the are rainbow coloured,but also invisble and live in a different plain of existence that we cannot measure,feel or test,prove now prove me wrong.impossoble.it is up to the people claiming that there is a god ot give REAL proof of god.
mandrillx 4 weeks ago
@mandrillx "it is up to the people claiming that there is a god to give REAL proof of god."
Exactly.
TheBiAtheist 4 weeks ago
@TheBiAtheist There is no proof that there is a God in the tangible way you want it. You want to see a christian perform a miracle or for God to prove himself to you through wrath or miracle? The bible gives evidence that it is obvious that he made everything.. now I wouldn't say its actually "obvious" anymore, but I find it funny how everyone accepts the big bang theory as it is scientifically presented (ignores the law of cause and effect), then proceed with that there is probably no god. lol?
martiandog89 3 weeks ago
@martiandog89 "The bible gives evidence that it is obvious that he made everything."
The Bible has to meet its burden of proof before I can accept it as evidence. I have no more reason to believe the Bible is the 'word of God' than I do the Quran. Watch the series I promote in the sidebar of my channel to understand why your appeal to the Bible is unconvincing to me. Thanks for your comment nonetheless.
TheBiAtheist 3 weeks ago
Your description says "The Cosmos is vast beyond your comprehension.", yet you claim that what you can perceive is proof that there is no God.
It seems the worda hubris and arrogance don't just relate to those of faith.
TheRoninshaman 2 months ago
@TheRoninshaman I guess you should watch the video. "beyond comprehension" only refers to the numbers involved, which are completely outside human experience.
However it is hardly beyond comprehension. We comprehend quite a large bit of it.
sorienor 1 month ago
@TheRoninshaman If you think the universe was created just so humans could exist then you are arrogant and ignorant. The Universe is 13,7 billion years old, human beings have only been around for 200,000 years. This means that we have been around for only 0.0000685% of the time the Universe has. 99% of all species to lived on this planet have gone extinct. We should thank our lucky stars we are here (literally) not God. We are all made of Star Dust, stars had to die for you to be here,
theBartone9119 1 month ago
Wikipedia says the tail of the tadpole galaxy is 280,000 light years long, not 280,000,000. I am always interested in hearing how people lost their religion. Thanks for sharing.
WarmWeatherGuy 2 months ago
@WarmWeatherGuy Have you watched the playlist 'Why I Am No Longer A Christian' by user Evid3nc3? If you haven't, I promise you it will be your favorite one.
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago
@TheBiAtheist Good call on Evid3nc3. His series is awesome. It seems that people get their religion when they are young and gullible. When we are young we are so gullible that we believe ANYTHING, even tooth fairies and Santa. Another way people get religion is when they are emotionally distraught (think suicidal). Contrast this to how people lose their religion: Education, reason, thinking and reading the Bible. It's interesting, isn't it?
WarmWeatherGuy 1 month ago
@WarmWeatherGuy His religious life was very similar to mine. We both grew up in the Assemblies of God, went to Royal Rangers, and were both 'filled with the Holy Spirit' at a young age. You wouldn't have been able to convince me that I was wrong. I still think about how I could've never gotten out of it.
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago
He is greater than all language, and no statement can express Him. Indeed, if any statement could express Him, He would be less than human speech which could by such statement comprehend and gather up all that He is. All our thoughts about Him will be less than He, and our loftiest utterances will be trivialities in comparison with Him.
r9670712 2 months ago
@r9670712 Who do you actually think you're going to convince by merely preaching?
TheBiAtheist 1 month ago
Here, and in all our meditations upon the qualities and content of God, we pass beyond our power of fit conception, nor can human eloquence put forth a power commensurate with His greatness. At the contemplation and utterance of His majesty all eloquence is rightly dumb, all mental effort is feeble. For God is greater than mind itself. His greatness cannot be conceived. Nay, could we conceive of His greatness He would be less than the human mind which could form the conception.
r9670712 2 months ago
@r9670712 What a giant, meaningless, steaming hot load of bullshit. Thanks for playing though, you don't get to state whatever you want and pretend it is fact.
Evidence, please. Or go away.
sorienor 2 months ago 3
@sorienor You evidently missed the point of my comments, which was to convey that there is not, cannot and will never be 'evidence' of a supreme, divine and eternal being. Because there being 'evidence' of an eternal, infinite God is contradictory. Maybe those of you set out on the intent of disproving God should go back to the bible where it's made clear He is outside of our scientific theories and the universe He created. It's very simple. The evidence is in your soul.
r9670712 2 months ago
@r9670712 So god is completely unknowable yet we know with absolute certainty what he does and does not want us to do? Please...
It's amazing how the invisible and the non-existent are so much alike..
sorienor 2 months ago
Actually the bible says we are created in the image of god. This includes our intellect and free will this includes our logical mind. so dont use the bible to prove your points
GRDiver94 2 months ago
Yes, Where is God, with all this Hate, Anger, Harsh Reality ? My Grandfather Passed in 1979. Gentle - Simple Man. He was only 60, He got a Bad Cold, Never Recovered. I have not heard or seen him since. Maybe " Life " was an Accident ? or a Higher Beings ( Aliens to Us ), Who Knows ? If there is a " GOD " , I have MANY Questions for Him, Her, It ? Thank You
RustArtRed 2 months ago
I only believe in what I see..
VideozCod 2 months ago
Each of which is so improbable that before it would occur the Sun would have ceased to be a main sequence star and incinerated the earth. And they calculate the probability of the evolution of the human genome to be somewhere between 4 to the -180th power to the 110,000 power and 4 to the -360th power to the 110,000 power. So if evolution did occur on this planet it was literally a miracle and therefore evidence for the existence of God.
trechbodyboardin 2 months ago
@trechbodyboardin That is all complete, total bullshit. You can't have odds of something you only have 1 sample of. Sorry. Those are all numbers literally pulled out of someone's ass.
sorienor 2 months ago
@trechbodyboardin yes because some unexplained, unexplainable all-powerful being suddenly *poof* everything into existance by magic just makes so much fucking sense..
sorienor 2 months ago
@trechbodyboardin by calculating the probability of ANY eventuality you will end up disproving its own existence. Just because it is improbable DOES NOT MEAN that God is responsible. That is a major cop out that crumbles under the weakest amount of thought.
Xloi63 2 months ago
'IT WAS ALL MADE SO I COULD EXIST' is a statement that LIFE ITSELF makes and if anyone connects to life itself they can 'feel it' and its true !
ashwadhwani 2 months ago
Comment removed
ashwadhwani 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"27. And (remember) the Day when the Zalim (wrong-doer, oppressor, polytheist, etc.) will bite at his hands, he will say: "Oh! Would that I had taken a path with the Messenger ( Muhammad ).
28. "Ah! Woe to me! Would that I had never taken so-and-so as a friend!
29. "He indeed led me astray from the Reminder (this Qur'an) after it had come to me. And Shaitan (Satan) is ever a deserter to man in the hour of need.""
Al-Quran:25
emaan456 2 months ago
fucking idiot...their is a purpose to every being....in otherwords if we came from a spark...who do u think made that spark?
SpazerWillNeverDie 2 months ago
@SpazerWillNeverDie Just by using the term "who" you're begging the question.
sorienor 2 months ago 3
"9. See they not what is before them and what is behind them, of the heaven and the earth? If We will, We shall sink the earth with them, or cause a piece of the heaven to fall upon them. Verily, in this is a sign for every faithful believer that [believes in the Oneness of Allah], and turns to Allah (in all affairs with humility and in repentance)."
Al-Quran:34
emaan456 2 months ago
"4. Those who disbelieve say: "This (the Qur'an) is nothing but a lie that he (Muhammad ) has invented, and others have helped him at it, so that they have produced an unjust wrong (thing) and a lie."
5. And they say: "Tales of the ancients, which he has written down, and they are dictated to him morning and afternoon."
6. Say: "It (this Qur'an) has been sent down by Him (Allah) Who knows the secret of the heavens and the earth. Truly, He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.""
Al-Quran:25
emaan456 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Disbelievers Future!
"31. And those who disbelieve say: "We believe not in this Qur'an nor in that which was before it," but if you could see when the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers, etc.) will be made to stand before their Lord, how they will cast the (blaming) word one to another! Those who were deemed weak will say to those who were arrogant: "Had it not been for you, we should certainly have been believers!"
Al-Quran:34
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 Oh would you fucking stop already. No one gives one little tiny shit what is written in your 1400 year old book of lies, fairy tales and bullshit.
it's all fucking bullshit. Every word. Either come up with an original thought or, Thor help me you'll be blocked.
sorienor 2 months ago
@sorienor what is your problem brother?
Dont you know FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EXPRESSION?
emaan456 2 months ago
@emaan456 Spamming is not expression. it's mindless cut and paste.
sorienor 2 months ago
theory
cjguitarist100 3 months ago
see evolutionist and athiests dont want there to be a god because of their lifestyle their sins they dont want to give that up look at adolf hittler another athiest who decided to kill all the jews because once you dont believe then theres no reason to obey law or be faithfull to your spouse because the bible doesnt matter all evolution is doing is saying theres no meaning to life its just accidental thats why we have crime rate sky rocketed since they started teaching evolution as fact not
cjguitarist100 3 months ago
@cjguitarist100 LOL you're such a tool. First, and also completely irrelevantly, Hitler was a self-professed Christian whose antisemitism was fueled by 100's of years of christian dogma.
Second, the rest of your post is just plain old-fashioned bullshit, fueled by your own personal hatred and bigotry. Not a single thing there is accurate.
Please explain to me how you can be moral following the teachers of the misogynistic, mass-murdering, jealous, tyrannical monster of a god in the bible?
sorienor 2 months ago
no if you can believe god wasnt created then you cant believe that energy wasnt created either i mean god is energy man see evolutionists tell you bogus stuff that just doesnt add up and further more they dont tell you all the flaws there is in evolution that has been prooven evolution itself is a belief like religion if you cant scientificaly proove it its not science
cjguitarist100 3 months ago
@cjguitarist100 We have a word for energy, "energy". No need re-label it "god" to fit the maniacal rantings of illiterate bronze-aged desert nomads.
Because having everything created out of nothing by magic makes oh so much more sense the provable science.
and despite the LIES you've been told by your fellow sheep, evolution is not only provable, but has been proven. Sorry. You've been deceived. Ask them why they have to lie for Jesus?
sorienor 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"58. Then tell Me (about) the human semen that you emit.
59. Is it you who create it (i.e. make this semen into a perfect human being), or are We the Creator?
60. We have decreed death to you all, and We are not unable,
61. To transfigure you and create you in (forms) that you know not.
62. And indeed, you have already known the first form of creation (i.e. the creation of Adam), why then do you not remember or take heed?"
Al-Quran:56
emaan456 3 months ago
I say these images are fabricated and not shown like this in reality. FAKE
ed2see 3 months ago
emaan456 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 3 months ago
@Mogley52 You're so completely full of shit it's not even worth responding to you. At all.
Why do you have to lie for Jesus?
sorienor 2 months ago
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
Mogley52 3 months ago
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 3 months ago
HUMAN-CHIMP DNA MYTH: The actual similarity is between 70-87% not 99.8% as commonly believed. The original research stating 99.8% similarity was based on ignoring contradicting evidence. Read the article, "Evaluating the Human-Chimp DNA Myth--New Research Data" at the Institute for Creation Research Site. The similarities are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes, rather than chance. Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
Mogley52 3 months ago
MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC is similar to seeing an earthquake churn-up a few well-formed rocks and concluding from this that earthquakes, if given enough time, can construct a building. Macro-evolutionists take the little things here and there produced by chance and extrapolate it into something extraordinary and then call it science. Notice, all evolutionists begin with a complete species. They don't begin their theory with partially-evolved species, with partially-evolved tissues and organs.
Mogley52 3 months ago
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. For every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 3 months ago
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
""like it or not evolution is a fact""
Yeah but you cant prove that. You sniveling fools think that youy can call it a fact without evidence bc someone that calls themselves a teacher, expert or authority said its a fact. So why dont u come clean and admit that you just believe so and so that told you that it was a fact.
I could be wrong and wait for anyone to debate me on this. I guaranteed ull be humiliated for ur own good
j919or 3 months ago
"1. Read! In the Name of your Lord, Who has created (all that exists),
2. Has created man from a clot (a piece of thick coagulated blood).
3. Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous,
4. Who has taught (the writing) by the pen [the first person to write was Prophet Idrees (Enoch)],
5. Has taught man that which he knew not.
6. Nay! Verily, man does transgress all bounds (in disbelief and evil deed, etc.).
7. Because he considers himself self-sufficient."
Al-Quran:96
emaan456 3 months ago
hubris? i call it graditude
idlemind009 3 months ago
The bible says that everything was created by God, meaning that everything has a creator, why does God not have one? If God was not created, then nothing can have a creator. God is said to be the source of everything, which means he created time and space, so he must have existed outside time and space. If everything comes from God, then God lacks everything he creates, like moral, or logic, if God comes from God, then God does not exist. If God is the cause of everything, God is void.
bloodclots99 3 months ago 8
@bloodclots99 Interesting approach. Of course for me the main problem is the first three words.
sorienor 3 months ago
@bloodclots99 ""meaning that everything has a creator, why does God not have one? ""
Either there is one eternal creator that always existed or there must be an infinite number of creators
j919or 3 months ago
@bloodclots99 nice paradox! :)
GoodCat444 3 months ago
@bloodclots99 if God Lacks logic he doesn't care about yours
GRDiver94 2 months ago
@GRDiver94 Or yours, so why bother to defend yourself.
bloodclots99 2 months ago
@bloodclots99 as well, if he is spaceless and timeless, then he cannot act, and he is not there. Point that out whenever a theist says God is above being made of matter.
Xloi63 2 months ago
@sorienor I agree with you about the fact that there is no god, however that doesn't mean you can intervine with others beliefs.
tehnoobtune 3 months ago
@tehnoobtune Yes but it's perfectly ok for the moronic asshats to interfere with mine on a daily basis? I think not.
sorienor 2 months ago
Science and reason = human curiosity, research and progress. Religion = dogma, blind acceptance (of old fables) and dullness of the mind. It's only those who haven't had the chance or the will to study science properly who still really believe in religion.
Forthright1 3 months ago
"7. And He it is Who has created the heavens and the earth in six Days and His Throne was on the water, that He might try you, which of you is the best in deeds. But if you were to say to them: "You shall indeed be raised up after death," those who disbelieve would be sure to say, "This is nothing but obvious magic. "
Al-Quran:11
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 wtf no one cares what your fucking book says moron.
sorienor 3 months ago 2
@sorienor 6. And for those who disbelieve in their Lord is the torment of Hell, and worst indeed is that destination.
7. When they are cast therein, they will hear the drawing in of its breath as it blazes forth.
8. It almost bursts up with fury. Every time a group is cast therein, its keeper will ask: "Did no warner come to you?"
9. They will say: "Yes indeed; a warner did come to us, but we belied him and said: 'Allah never sent down anything, you are only in great error.'"
Al-Quran:67
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 You're still at it, aren't you!! You seem desperate - desperate to keep spouting inane rubbish from a third rate book of man-made fairy tales. Thought you would have learned a bit of a lesson from our exchanges over the past couple of days (which would really amuse anyone with an open mind who reads them). Can't you see that no one gives a damn about you or your fatuous posts?
I admire sorienor because he puts it much more succinctly than I do. How do you feel about that?
Forthright1 3 months ago
@Forthright1 I feel great about it as I am doing my work and you ppl are doing exactly what is waiting for you hereafter.
Whatever you said about Quran shows your poor study and research in the time of 'touch'.
Do read my reply to sorienor that is for all ppl who are disbelieving....What I can say in favor of you ppl is "May ALLAH show all of you the right path" but I know who seeks,Finds!
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 zzzzzzzzzzzzzz No one really gives a fuck. You've already been exposed.
Forthright1 3 months ago
@Forthright1 "4. And a great number of towns (their population) We destroyed (for their crimes). Our torment came upon them (suddenly) by night or while they were sleeping for their afternoon rest.
5. No cry did they utter when Our Torment came upon them but this: "Verily, we were Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers, etc.)".
Al-Quran:07
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 You desperate, sad little man. No one gives a fuck about your moronic, worthless trashy islamist posts, loser.
Forthright1 3 months ago
@Forthright1 "16. Do you feel secure that He, Who is over the heaven (Allah), will not cause the earth to sink with you, then behold it shakes (as in an earthquake)?
17. Or do you feel secure that He, Who is over the heaven (Allah), will not send against you a violent whirlwind? Then you shall know how (terrible) has been My Warning?
18. And indeed those before them belied (the Messengers of Allah), then how terrible was My denial (punishment)?"
Al-Quran:67
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 zzzzzzzzz you sad little fearmongering islamist desperado. No one gives a fuck about you or your ridiculous posts.
Forthright1 3 months ago
@emaan456 Have you read Richard Carrier's article 'Epicurus vs Mohammed' yet? I recommended it for you more than a week ago. Google it and read it with an open mind (if at all possible for you). It'll enlighten you big time.
Forthright1 3 months ago
@Forthright1 "14. Say: "Shall I take as a Wali (helper, protector, etc.) any other than Allah, the Creator of the heavens and the earth? And it is He Who feeds but is not fed." Say: "Verily, I am commanded to be the first of those who submit themselves to Allah (as Muslims)." And be not you of the Mushrikun [polytheists, pagans, idolaters and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah].
15. Say: "I fear, if I disobey my Lord, the torment of a Mighty Day.""
Al-Quran:06
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 Desperate hell-fire enthusiast, you're wasting your time. No one gives a damn about your moronic posts.
Forthright1 3 months ago
@emaan456 You desperate sad, little man. No one gives a fuck about your moronic, worthless, trashy islamist posts, loser.
Forthright1 3 months ago
In my humble opinion, this does not prove that there is no God, the bible explains how "we" where conceived and how "he" managed our history, but a person that knows about bible and stuff like this can see that we are not "superstars" in this vaste universe, what we know is our story; still this is my huble opinion, but sure as always, pictures of hiden places in the universe are always amazing and beautiful! indeed!
cyberalienakuma 3 months ago
jpest17, i can state thati AM a Christian young woman without being rejectedby you ! Someone , show him that he is wrong by disliking this video ! :(
RyanCfoundation 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
2 peter 3:8
"But do not forget this one thing, dear friends: With the Lord a day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like a day. The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. He is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance."
so if each day is or could be a thousand years then what creation took like 7 thousand years? possibly could be more. point is you can't disprove the bible. nor prove it till you die.
jpest17 3 months ago
@jpest17 I don't have to disprove the bible. Not only is there no reason to think any of it is true, but many of the stories and actions of the god character are morally reprehensible. Not to mention the core of the new testament - vicarious redemption - is simply the pinnacle of immorality.
sorienor 3 months ago
Comment removed
jpest17 3 months ago
THERE IS A GOD ! MY GOD , ,ALMIGHTY SAVIOR , JESUS CHRIST !! I AM a CHRISTIAN and have a STRONG belief in the ONE TRUE GOD!!! !
RyanCfoundation 3 months ago
@RyanCfoundation you seem like a troll...
jpest17 3 months ago
@RyanCfoundation do you mean JESUS CHRIST is a god?
emaan456 3 months ago
@RyanCfoundation You can believe whatever kind of made-up fairy-tale bullshit you want. But just becuase you believe it does not make it true.
sorienor 3 months ago 2
one question, how could the Universe have been created by an expoltion with no cause? think about it. if 0+0=0 how could there be any thing to make the Universe. ether A: there was some type of super natuaral creator or B: there was no Big Bang at all
xPray2die2dayx 3 months ago
@xPray2die2dayx OR the total energy of the universe is zero, which is actually the prevailing thought in cosmology at the moment. So the universe did not "come" from nothing, but was simply the splitting of nothing into equal but opposite components..which fits perfectly with all known physics.
sorienor 3 months ago 2
@sorienor but that puts most of what we know about physics in defiance. if i am not crushing a grape in my hand (there is no grape in my hand to start with) then nothing is splitting in my hand so there is a "chance" there will be a smashed grape in my hand? There could have been another way the Universe was made other than the Big Bang that does not have to be supernatural... maybe, but im just pointing out how clueless the Big Bang [ hypothesis ] is
xPray2die2dayx 3 months ago
@ImagineThersNoHeaven Electricity can not exist outside a medium to transport it. Heat similarly balances to the environment. As soon as the brain dies, the "energy" all dissipates.
"DO explain the N.D.E. of many many people."
NDE's are demonstrable and repeatable in test pilots in centrifuges.
NDE seem to be a completely natural, biological phenomenon. Magic has never been a solution to a problem, and doubtful it is for NDE's.
Simply stating you see the "soul" does not make it so!
sorienor 3 months ago
can you see this in google sky...???/ i see some pretty strange stuff on google sky,,..lots of crazy stuff,,i can upload the photos if u want....??
TheSerbianwizard 3 months ago
@ImagineThersNoHeaven dude, Santa clause and the rain deer's were real to you when u were like 3 or 5 years old,,but now u grew,.god and religion is just a sophisticated lie for stupid adults whose minds are too simple to understand the universe,,, the world would be much much better without religion,,,the government and pastors are just making money from your beliefs..i feel sorry for people who still believe in fairy tales..i believe in science,,the founder of medication that saves lives,,,,
TheSerbianwizard 3 months ago
Hawking Explains Multiverse
watch?v=oFUgMXVj0js
Denying the Consequent (valid)
If P, then Q.
Not Q.
Therefore, not P
IF multiverse theory is FALSE (P), THEN the Lord's Kingdom EXISTS FINITELY in THIS KOSMOS. (Q)
John 18:36. "My kingdom is NOT of THIS (Gr.) KOSMOS." (Not Q)
Therefore, multiverse theory is NOT FALSE. (Not P).
PrinceWalter 3 months ago
part 2
Affirming the Antecedent (valid)
If P, then Q.
P.
Therefore, Q.
If multiverse theory is NOT FALSE (P), THEN the Lord's Kingdom may EXIST UNBOUND (INFINITELY) by THIS KOSMOS. (Q)
Multiverse theory is NOT FALSE. (former conclusion), (P)
Therefore, the Lord's Kingdom may EXIST UNBOUND (INFINITELY) by THIS KOSMOS (Q)
PrinceWalter 3 months ago
@PrinceWalter WTF?
Prove your Q to be true. otherwise you're just doing a mental masterbation.
sorienor 3 months ago
@sorienor
simple.
A great deal of current, scientific research suggests that this Universe has an end, and that it is finite.
Therefore, if God exists in this Universe, he too would be finite or have an end.
If I had simply said, "If multiverse theory is NOT FALSE (P), THEN the Lord's Kingdom may EXIST"...
THAT would require a lot of singing and dancing on my part, but the qualifier makes the argument quite clear.
PrinceWalter 3 months ago
@PrinceWalter
*E.g. some theories that "dark matter" will cause what a few call "the big rip" ripping everything in the Universe apart. That's one theory.
PrinceWalter 3 months ago
@ImagineThersNoHeaven lol "Energy is.... energy. " tautologies are fun eh?
Energy, just so you know, is defined as "the ability to do work". There is no such thing as "energy" that floats around and exists like in fucking star trek.
I wouldn't be so condescending if you weren't so willfully ignorant.
sorienor 3 months ago
@ImagineThersNoHeaven
"WHAT becomes of the 'person' after they die?"
They cease to exist. Just that simple. It will be just like before you were born.
"but I am pretty sure that what makes humans "run" does not 'die' away and become nothing. "
Why would you think that, and what evidence do you have?
"The "soul" might simply be 'energy'... "
Please look up the definition of energy..
sorienor 3 months ago
"37. And they said: "Why is not a sign sent down to him from his Lord?" Say: "Allah is certainly Able to send down a sign, but most of them know not."
38. There is not a moving (living) creature on earth, nor a bird that flies with its two wings, but are communities like you. We have neglected nothing in the Book, then unto their Lord they (all) shall be gathered.
39. Those who reject Our Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, etc.) are deaf and dumb in darkness."
Al-Quran:06
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 Don't you have your own brain that you could possibly use to contribute to a conversation rather than keep quoting from a boring man-made book full of repetitions, abrogations and incitement of violence? And regarding your risible claim that quran mentions the big bang, I suggest that you do a bit of real research and you'll find that Epicurus made a number of astonishingly accurate scientific predictions (including the nature of the universe) about 9 centuries before mohammed!
Forthright1 3 months ago
@Forthright1 LOL....First of all your claims are wrong about Quran and its not scientific at all to use such words for any thing you dont have your personal research.
And if you do have your research related to that thing then you should ask question rather blaming blindly....
Quran made a simple challenge to mankind....why dont you ppl accept it in order to prove yourself?
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 Without the use of overused, unintelligent abbreviations like 'LOL', may I point out that you would help yourself communicate more lucidly by using correct English like knowing when to use "it's" rather than "its" and just structuring your sentences a bit better. That aside, quranic incitements of violence are evident in its verses 9:29 and 4:89 (if you've ever bothered to understand it with translation) and abrogations in 2:106 and 16:101. Talk about 'blaming blindly'!
Forthright1 3 months ago
@Forthright1 Related to 9:29 reference from Quran.Well its a law for Islamic government how to treat the non believers(tax) and war related commands.Its a common practice to pick verses out of context from Quran.This is the book of miracles one can find Islamic jurisprudence,economic laws,guidance,scientific discoveries,future predictions and lot more that we(Muslims) dint discover as yet.The key to get the guidance from it is to become pious and neutral Then see how its magic works on you:)
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 You don't seem to learn, do you? You're repeating the same English mistakes (basic) in all of your comments. Come on man, make an effort and learn some proper language skills! Your English is so bad! Coming to the real point, what contradictory and hilarious things you say! So, it's right for quran (9:29) to tell muslims to fight and kill non-muslims and impose jizya upon conquering them? How barbaric! What more evidence do you need that this evil book preaches violence?
Forthright1 3 months ago
@Forthright1 You are not replying in my native language right?
I am replying you in your language so who is better in learning...one can easily guess.
If Islamic govt takes tax from non-Muslims then its for their security and services that are offered for living and enjoying all types of facilities including freedom of belief.Whats wrong and barbaric in it btw?
Becoming Muslim goes purely in your benefit but if you chose other then you have a right to enjoy this life.
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 What makes you think that you're 'replying in my language'? English is my second language, Urdu first. You're used to making assumptions, aren't you? Assuming something without bothering to research is a prime hallmark of lack of intelligence. Frankly, you have exhibited that in all of your comments so far.
Forthright1 3 months ago
@Forthright1 one thing I am not here to argue or prove my intelligence.
second I have given you the message of Islam.After Islam no other religion will be accepted from ppl.
There is Only One GOD and Muhammad(S.A.W) is the last messenger.Every one will be accountable for his or her deeds in judgement day.
For further information study Quran and visit sites.
Either You accept Islam or Not is none of my business.Peace!
emaan456 3 months ago
@emaan456 Even though you continue to make ludicrous statements like 'after islam no other religion will be accepted from ppl', and the fact that you have had the cheek to call people who do not believe in islam 'negative-minded' and 'diseased' (attributes that would better suit you and anyone else who follows any religion blindly without investigating) earlier, peace to you too.
Also, there is no need to tell us to study quran; of course I have and, therefore, I'm telling you what it says.
Forthright1 3 months ago
@emaan456 It's so amusing how you casually defend the violence preached in quran's 9:29 by saying things like 'well it's a law for islamic government how to treat non believers (tax) and war related commands' when this verse clearly tells muslims to fight and kill people just because they don't believe in allah and islam (without any provocation!). Your 'picking verses out of context' excuse is so old and so sucks. Then you talk about neutrality in order to understand it!!! How hypocritical.
Forthright1 3 months ago
@Forthright1 I have given you clear proof that the verse is related to war and now you are arguing by making false points.All religions and govt have their laws of war killing humans and leaving none.
Islam gave the laws in which women,children,old and sick ppl are not allowed to kill.During Prophet hood all wars were imposed on muslims.In imposed war muslims kill only men(attackers).
From the same thing,every person conceives different according to his mentality.
emaan456 3 months ago