its nice that debris can provide a habitat.. but im not going to eliminate the idea that natural coral reefs, especially near the shores, arent just as good or even better.
So all that debris provides a place for life to start, just as they have been doing with artificial reefs for a century. Old cars, trains, concrete scrap are assets to the ocean. Even contaminated structures, in the scheme of things, are but a blink of an eye in the life of the planet and are eventually taken over by the denizens of the deep.
Anyone who has ever spent any time under the water should have noticed that. I'm a dive master, and all the best places I take my tours are all places that trash and other rubbish have hit the sea floor.
that depends on what kind of trash, if its floating then pick it up,if its not floating well then lets not pick it up. everything that reaches the sea floor can act as a benefit to the enviorment.
They mentioned that the trash does more harm then good at the end of the video. Maybe the people arguing with this video could listen some more before wanting to start a losing battle on the youtube comments.
To those discrediting this video, I propose that you yourself perform even 15 months worth of studies into oceanic biodiversity and, whilst you're at it, I suggest you study into coral reef formation.
Trash takes AGES to turn into a piece of habitat for a variety of organisms. That doesnt mean that a group of invertebrates living on a plastic cup which is slowly breaking down wont STILL be poisoned by it. Thats not to say just because a kitchen sink can be a hidey hole for some animals, that it shouldnt fucking BE there.
Biodiversity needs to be balanced with natural selection here. If you want animals to have new habitats, throw them some fucking rocks and stones.
have you studied biology? how long have you recorded your findings? id like to swap ideas. =]
if not keep insulting comments to your self. true it should never be there. with the exception of chemicals or traps they should be assessed before extracted.
@sangreiti I studied biology for long enough to know plastics in the environment do more harm than good, the only good of course being some form of shelter. Just because a fox finds a tin with food in it doesnt mean it isnt going to get its head stuck.
However, the ones that are highly colonized should be left there, I agree on that point. By then its already too late, and it should be treated as a tragedy. The ones that are NOT colonized heavily, and cause dangers, should be removed.
15 year looking at rubbish to realise its good in the sea?...... well blow me over, i cant believe im paying these guys for 15 years with my taxes to swin in the sea and look at crap,... im might show them my toilet and say
That's like saying we should stop burying our trash because trash that's left laying around can become habitats for plants and animals like moss and rats.
Well, there is offcourse a limit to how much trash you can dump in the ocean but i have heard that they are blowing up old ships all over the world sinking them to the sea floor because that creates a good habitat for fish. and corals.
The real problems of the sea (not that garbage is a fake one), are abusive fishing (that's the most brutal and dangerous problem with sea life today), and pollution.
I believe that a hundred thousands tons cruise boat, can cause more harm to sea life in one Atlantic-crossing trip, than a teapot can cause in a thousand years.
and what have YOU done that's more productive in understanding deep sea life?
These guys determined that, for the most part, the stuff we lose to the oceans is actually quite the benefit for life down there. I would say that certainly there is a possibility that people should consider throwing away CERTAIN trash down there to help with the biodiversity down there.
Besides, think about this: how much of our trash, percentage-wise, could be converted underwater into a habitat for deep life?
the question isnt that what i have done, but mind you, if i had a choice of doing some research it wouldnt certainly be evaluating trash in the ocean.
and they looked at trash and did that for 15years......15years to detemine if the trash was colonised by sea life?
do you understand the length of that time. i was 5years old when they started that remarkable research.
i'm sry i'm not trying to be rude, but in my oppinion 15years of research could have gone to something MUCH more usefull.
You'd be surprised at how some of the things we perceive as being useless are actually very important and more complex that people can imagine.
Also, consider that they had to go to different environments, probably all around the world, observing them underwater, watching them develop... do you know how much all of that would cost in 15 years?
And like you suggest, it certainly sounds silly, and especially something that probably wasn't as funded as other projects, but its importance is great.
hey theres like 6 billion people in the world and if everyone researched "important stuff" then stuff like this would be neglected and the ocean invironments might be destroyed.
anyways i think what they researched is prety significant.
Hmm, I'm no marine biologist... but I would guess it takes time for marine life to benefit from waste left on the sea floor.
Until then it looks to me like each poses more of a danger, like the prawn cage. Presumably all sorts of characteristics affect whether a piece of trash can be colonised.
the planet earth isnt what people are worried about, but its inhabitants. lifeforms can adapt to all kinds of environments, but people are concerned with preserving the environment for lifeforms that are already in certain locations. its not just about having any old living thing occupy a space.
This is about better allocation of money used in restoration and clean up operations. Spending thousands on dredging teapots from the bottom of the ocean is wasteful and counter productive.
@subwoofspeak Here in the Faroe Islands where whaling (in a humane way, not barbaric murder) is common, the whale blubber is almost uneatable due to chemical waste dumped by, well, you and me.
I think if I got to choose a job I would like to be a scientist, like marine or something. To me, this would be a evry day vaccation, sure paperwork but a bareable ammount of it. And you earn enough to travel the world around 10 times by just working a month... sweet
yea i seen it all the time small sea animals clinging on or swimging near too this rubbish as it offers protection in a big ocean full of bigger things that like the taste of those smaller things just goes to show that one mans trash is anothers gold!
adj Yeah, but that's not "underwater" trash, cause as you said, it's an island of trash and thus on the surface. That'sliterally a huge problem in the Pacific, that island of plastic! It pollutes, it kills animals, organisms and it will demand huge resources to get rid of it, billions and billions and billions it will cost
The thing about that "island" of trash is that it's not literally an island. It's a higher than normal concentration of small plastic particles. Still harmful, but not exactly something where they could just take a net out and start scooping up rubbish.
@jhamaker S¤#t, that maybe makes it even more harmful, then? Since those small particles so easily comes into organisms, fishes, whales and so on? And a more difficult problem to get rid of because you can't just scoop it up, as you said? Ouch, sounds horrible.: (
Can you read? Or are you just too eager to try and be a smart ass? You seem to be the blind one, I said toxic waste. It is being dumped in the sea but it is not mentioned in this video. A small amount of footage, of a small carefully selected area is not a clear representation of the affect of waste in the oceans. Do you know how big the oceans are? Not everything you watch on here is entirely truthful.
YOU FOUND MY ARTILLERY SHELL!
LepidopteraPhobia 7 months ago
That place is certainly not a safe haven for hippies.
mgwager 10 months ago
OMG my kitchen sink thats were itwent
educationalfish 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you're interested in art, camouflage and trash/pollution watch: Safe the planet-Recycling Art" and "Miss Biarritz". Enjoy it!!
LoulouisaRa 1 year ago
thats why retired planes are sunk in the water to support reef growth
SnowingNapalm 1 year ago
removing trash could be more deadly than good? are you retarded? we're a chemical society, what do you think that does to the health of the water?
siqbrah 1 year ago
i think watching under water is scary!!! :(
stupidYOOTUBE 1 year ago
omg
trash is now officially underwater o.O
we're doomed
OohieuoO 1 year ago
@OohieuoO
i'm assuming you've never heard of this then:
en.wikipedia (dot) org/wiki/Great_Pacific_Garbage_Patch
Everfalling 1 year ago
its nice that debris can provide a habitat.. but im not going to eliminate the idea that natural coral reefs, especially near the shores, arent just as good or even better.
josephlin01 1 year ago
So all that debris provides a place for life to start, just as they have been doing with artificial reefs for a century. Old cars, trains, concrete scrap are assets to the ocean. Even contaminated structures, in the scheme of things, are but a blink of an eye in the life of the planet and are eventually taken over by the denizens of the deep.
bafrank3poc 1 year ago
nature always finds a way.
ad627 1 year ago
Well, they throw in metro train cars down there so I guess it can't be that bad...
strilight 1 year ago
YOU FOUND MY TEAPOT!
CrazyMcSwaggin 2 years ago 27
lol
OriginalDragonBallZ 1 year ago
Anyone who has ever spent any time under the water should have noticed that. I'm a dive master, and all the best places I take my tours are all places that trash and other rubbish have hit the sea floor.
faiaman123 2 years ago
lol a fucking tea pot!
out of nowhere!
TexTK 2 years ago 8
that would be hard man...
if u clean out the trash creatures can be harmed
if u dont clean it out more creatures will be affected..
man wtf i dont get it T_T
ravenven 2 years ago 2
omg fungi on cannon shell
BovrilKetchup 2 years ago
Cool
ZONKUF 2 years ago
A teapot, lol
DoctorWhoNinteyFive 2 years ago
Dam, my car just broke down... could sombody give me a hand? the coastline is not far.
gringodeltoro1 2 years ago 3
Drain the oil out first and submerge it in soapy water just to be sure.
mostliberal 2 years ago
So that's where the Americans dumped british tea
ObliviuxProductions 2 years ago 2
where did that come from?
itsme48423 2 years ago
0:20
stupid crab things
Frances3654 2 years ago
This voice makes me fall asleep... at least Sandrine was enthusiastic about what she was talking about.
MastermindX 2 years ago
hope those rubbish are not TOXIC!
chakazul 2 years ago
that depends on what kind of trash, if its floating then pick it up,if its not floating well then lets not pick it up. everything that reaches the sea floor can act as a benefit to the enviorment.
Coleostro 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
blah blah blah blah blah you're all retarted stfu its youtube
gregthebunny553 2 years ago
@gregthebunny553 Retarded* You dumbass
Robinhood12347 2 years ago
Trash maybe, but pollutants no.
zelikris 2 years ago 2
wow official permission from scientists to go leave all our thrash in the ocean... COOL!!!!
zx1011 2 years ago
They mentioned that the trash does more harm then good at the end of the video. Maybe the people arguing with this video could listen some more before wanting to start a losing battle on the youtube comments.
mdyschester 2 years ago
REMOVING trash, with the exception of traps and the like.
sangreiti 2 years ago
removing trash does more harm than good.*
sangreiti 2 years ago
To those discrediting this video, I propose that you yourself perform even 15 months worth of studies into oceanic biodiversity and, whilst you're at it, I suggest you study into coral reef formation.
the12packweb 2 years ago
=] thank you
sangreiti 2 years ago
Bullshit.
Trash takes AGES to turn into a piece of habitat for a variety of organisms. That doesnt mean that a group of invertebrates living on a plastic cup which is slowly breaking down wont STILL be poisoned by it. Thats not to say just because a kitchen sink can be a hidey hole for some animals, that it shouldnt fucking BE there.
Biodiversity needs to be balanced with natural selection here. If you want animals to have new habitats, throw them some fucking rocks and stones.
tw1stedgrudge 2 years ago
@tw1stedgrudge how many ages?
coolace108 2 years ago
i like the question.
sangreiti 2 years ago
@coolace108 Depends on the trash, of course. Thousands of years. Only a few. Depends on what it is, really.
tw1stedgrudge 2 years ago
have you studied biology? how long have you recorded your findings? id like to swap ideas. =]
if not keep insulting comments to your self. true it should never be there. with the exception of chemicals or traps they should be assessed before extracted.
sangreiti 2 years ago
@sangreiti I studied biology for long enough to know plastics in the environment do more harm than good, the only good of course being some form of shelter. Just because a fox finds a tin with food in it doesnt mean it isnt going to get its head stuck.
However, the ones that are highly colonized should be left there, I agree on that point. By then its already too late, and it should be treated as a tragedy. The ones that are NOT colonized heavily, and cause dangers, should be removed.
tw1stedgrudge 2 years ago 3
Well my Chihuahua got her mouth stuck in a some kind of spray can cap that was torn off the actuall spray can.
outlaWeasel 2 years ago
have you been diving near sunken ships? there absolutely beautiful.
sangreiti 2 years ago
@sangreiti Correct. So is a Black Widow spider on closeup on a deathly hot summers day in a bush of Poison Ivy. Doesnt mean I'd touch it.
Its beautiful, but the heavy metals and foreign objects simply shouldnt be there in the first place. As they degrade, they do pose a danger.
tw1stedgrudge 2 years ago 2
@sangreiti I have dived near an old old 1800's iron warship. Its incredible.
NigelGriff 1 year ago
@NigelGriff it truly is
sangreiti 1 year ago
well now i know where to dump my sink basin.
zombiekid16 2 years ago
haha...this is the opposite of wht v learnt at schools!!
07nevivarg 2 years ago
15 years for that research lol.........
pravicpu 2 years ago
life is resilient and can adapt to harsh conditions. biodiversity continues DESPITE our trash, NOT because of it!
1-minute propaganda soundbite. such bullshit.
zavierfire 2 years ago
I'd never thought that anyone would discover my old teapot. I'm ashamed now.
trakkaton 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
niggers under water?
beeqool 2 years ago
racists underwater? if there's one, i guess it'll be you.
ashrocks87 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nigger under water? if there's one, i guess it'll be you.
beeqool 2 years ago
lol thanks for copying my ORIGINAL POST.
ashrocks87 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol thanks for copying my ORIGINAL POST. nigger.
beeqool 2 years ago
"Removing Trash, can do more harm then good" lolxinfinity
inepticon 2 years ago 7
Its the SOLID trash that's "good" for their ecosystem. Meds, syringes, drugs, chemicals, nuclear waste, fuel, and shit could hurt fish.
mostliberal 2 years ago 23
one man's trash is another ecosystem's treasure.
paulhallart 2 years ago 6
Ha ha. He said 'rubbish'.
KoewlBag 2 years ago
so remember kids, next time you need to get rid of that old fridge, just dump it in the ocean :D
squidmanlol 2 years ago
15 year looking at rubbish to realise its good in the sea?...... well blow me over, i cant believe im paying these guys for 15 years with my taxes to swin in the sea and look at crap,... im might show them my toilet and say
" go fish idiots"
solarbeam555 2 years ago
yeah. we'd rather have our tax money bail out bankers and be used on war we oppose instead.
radicalhit 2 years ago
wtf, so put your trash in the water!!!!
dumb
catadeluxe 2 years ago
@catadeluxe Pretty much the whole of the industrialized world's trash eventually ends up in the ocean.
righteousham 2 years ago
@catadeluxe
trash, pesticides, mercury, ddt, herbicides, fertilizers all wind up in the ocean, and then you ingest the same stuff by eating the fish.
PakaNoHida 2 years ago
Amazing.
coszz 2 years ago
lols the tee pot was in mint condition under the sea
TheScatman231 2 years ago
the tea would probably be cold by now though... 8*o( Anyone for coffee?
trje246 2 years ago 2
uuuuu...
MrRshd 2 years ago
makes sense
Tweakthefreak91 2 years ago
trash that is oxidation capable = good. Large concentrations of Polymer trash = bad.
mensalt62manus 2 years ago
0:50 lol :D
konrad12xpl 2 years ago
That's like saying we should stop burying our trash because trash that's left laying around can become habitats for plants and animals like moss and rats.
FatoDrunkoAndoStupid 2 years ago
@FatoDrunkoAndoStupid
like yanks, all trash is not equal.
hornetobiker 2 years ago
Not really, moss and rats can carry diseases, and infect humans. But I doubt that is a problem on the bottom of the sea.
KamiKagutsuchi 2 years ago
moral of the video. keep throwing your shit in the sea.
0871356005 2 years ago 7
@0871356005
Depends on the shit.
hornetobiker 2 years ago
Comment removed
kasuha 2 years ago
Hard to judge how good or bad about the trash. Nice work.
Cientistamarcos 2 years ago 2
awesome, likes start dumping more shit in the seas. it's eco-friendly =)
aussiedownunderman 2 years ago 6
Well if someone goes to Cozumel, you'll find an attraction of a sunken airplane. It's intended to be an ecological niche.
le00metalero 2 years ago
So the moral of the story is that we should stop dumping non-toxic trash in landfills and dump in the ocean instead.
subach 2 years ago
@subach
Well, there is offcourse a limit to how much trash you can dump in the ocean but i have heard that they are blowing up old ships all over the world sinking them to the sea floor because that creates a good habitat for fish. and corals.
Salladsdressing 2 years ago
i like turtles
0Dist 2 years ago
I would like to see the traps broken open and the prisoners set free...
Neat video 5 stars.
kaduisaui 2 years ago 2
I would definitely remove old nets and traps.
tetranoob 2 years ago 5
@tetranoob Not to mention all the surface-floating plastics.
Athaeus 2 years ago
@Athaeus good point.
tetranoob 2 years ago
yes, so that you can get some food.
jeffzahnd 2 years ago
those were my scientists
Fr0stBlade 2 years ago
that was my shark egg case
TigerSlashX 2 years ago
typical nature, you throw some rubbish away and eventually something will make a home of it.
skarnir 2 years ago
Yeah, leaving those traps and nets down there sounds like a brilliant idea you damn fools.
gocolts1 2 years ago 2
@gocolts1 dont act like u didnt do anything ive bet u have !!!@#!@#!@#!@#$!#@ DSAJKLD:KASJDFKSDN<MXCZC
rage13371 2 years ago
@gocolts1 they decompose and feed plankton faster so it is good in a way.
nsewx 2 years ago
good, i don't feel bad throwing away a lot of trash then!
weirdwei137 2 years ago
The real problems of the sea (not that garbage is a fake one), are abusive fishing (that's the most brutal and dangerous problem with sea life today), and pollution.
I believe that a hundred thousands tons cruise boat, can cause more harm to sea life in one Atlantic-crossing trip, than a teapot can cause in a thousand years.
ezekielwahwah 2 years ago 3
Well, they've got do much they have adapted to it.
Shaunt1 2 years ago
so the only trash that isnt good are the traps? makes sense i guess
Mrmtjones 2 years ago 5
A poor man's trash is a rich man's treasure.
Charlymaumushi 2 years ago
So, the good trash is the stuff that sinks to the bottom and does not decay alot, except for fishing equipment.
Cool to know! Now I know where to dump my cars.
mrpitchf0rk 2 years ago 2
Well, the cars that have been cleaned of contaminants.
mrpitchf0rk 2 years ago
Tires and Plastic still don't do any good.
AIWAC 2 years ago
that was my teacup
uli903 2 years ago 3
That was my artillery shell.
bloodjake12 2 years ago 3
@bloodjake12 that was my debris
uli903 2 years ago
That was my water
bloodjake12 2 years ago
@bloodjake12 that was my sea floor
uli903 2 years ago
That was my fish
bloodjake12 2 years ago
@bloodjake12 that was my narrator
uli903 2 years ago
That was my scientist
bloodjake12 2 years ago
@bloodjake12 that was my fish tank
uli903 2 years ago
those were my crabs!....oh wait.... nevermind *goes red*
trje246 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Its trash not rubbish in God's country.
minirobot1 2 years ago
dumb american..HahA
L3G1TxM16 2 years ago
Taking out the trash. Not rubbish. :3 White trash not White rubbish. Your trash not rubbish.
minirobot1 2 years ago
Reminds me of that Absolut Vodka commercial.
Maracachucho 2 years ago
This doesn't mean we can dump our trash in the ocean (damnit)
DamienHell 2 years ago 2
One man's trash is another creatures home, home sweet home! Still dumping in the ocean is wrong especially toxic chemicals that harm the sea life.
LTF85199 2 years ago 2
"the planet is fine... the people are f*cked" George Carlin
7hkey 2 years ago 4
lol at the artilliery shell
fenix611 2 years ago
Ever seen a sunken ship? They're like a underwater metropolis, very interesting.
MotionFur 2 years ago
so its good to put trash in the sea???
:)
catlord98765 2 years ago
Well no, but the point is that marine life is much better at adapting to it than terrestrial life.
That doesn't mean we should dump the shit out of fish.
RationalFuture 2 years ago 3
lmao
narsingdih 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
they studied THAT for 15years?
what a damn waste of time, and resources
outlawkelb 2 years ago
and what have YOU done that's more productive in understanding deep sea life?
These guys determined that, for the most part, the stuff we lose to the oceans is actually quite the benefit for life down there. I would say that certainly there is a possibility that people should consider throwing away CERTAIN trash down there to help with the biodiversity down there.
Besides, think about this: how much of our trash, percentage-wise, could be converted underwater into a habitat for deep life?
CalvinDWalker 2 years ago 2
the question isnt that what i have done, but mind you, if i had a choice of doing some research it wouldnt certainly be evaluating trash in the ocean.
and they looked at trash and did that for 15years......15years to detemine if the trash was colonised by sea life?
do you understand the length of that time. i was 5years old when they started that remarkable research.
i'm sry i'm not trying to be rude, but in my oppinion 15years of research could have gone to something MUCH more usefull.
outlawkelb 2 years ago
You'd be surprised at how some of the things we perceive as being useless are actually very important and more complex that people can imagine.
Also, consider that they had to go to different environments, probably all around the world, observing them underwater, watching them develop... do you know how much all of that would cost in 15 years?
And like you suggest, it certainly sounds silly, and especially something that probably wasn't as funded as other projects, but its importance is great.
CalvinDWalker 2 years ago 2
@outlawkelb perhaps everything useful should simply have 15 years of research.
AIWAC 2 years ago
hey theres like 6 billion people in the world and if everyone researched "important stuff" then stuff like this would be neglected and the ocean invironments might be destroyed.
anyways i think what they researched is prety significant.
Madmonkeythegreat 2 years ago
Figures. As long as it's not toxic, a pile of trash is like a pile of rocks to animals.
JustAnAdjunct 2 years ago 3
what to do with the trash thats removed from the ocean? trash is trash... why make trash in the first place?
ranagau 2 years ago
You go trash!
dude12nothin 2 years ago
That's pretty cool.!
xXDominoXx 2 years ago
interesting...the planet earth is not as susceptible to human pollution as much as many would have us believe.
linux750 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm no marine biologist... but I would guess it takes time for marine life to benefit from waste left on the sea floor.
Until then it looks to me like each poses more of a danger, like the prawn cage. Presumably all sorts of characteristics affect whether a piece of trash can be colonised.
noodlemasta 2 years ago 3
the planet earth isnt what people are worried about, but its inhabitants. lifeforms can adapt to all kinds of environments, but people are concerned with preserving the environment for lifeforms that are already in certain locations. its not just about having any old living thing occupy a space.
Pelonetillo 2 years ago 2
This is about better allocation of money used in restoration and clean up operations. Spending thousands on dredging teapots from the bottom of the ocean is wasteful and counter productive.
mecloptera 2 years ago
Interesting.
But that is still not an excuse to dump garbage in your local waterbody.
MagicAccent 2 years ago 5
lol the
irony
crbrs20 2 years ago
Wanna do something good for the oceans? Dump a car or something! Forms great caves and hidingplaces for young fish!
holsson85 2 years ago 2
thanks, im gona go drive my car into the ocean right now
lexmark136 2 years ago 7
haha, comment made my day.
dardraa 2 years ago
I'm going to dump my old car into the bay then! A octopus may find the leather seats comfortable!
kazimann 2 years ago
that's something i'd never thought of before =/
lolocaustism 2 years ago
WHAT? Trashing our oceans is BENEFICIAL to the environment?
Nice to see that the wildlife is turning our trash back into nature by turning them into their own mini-habitats!
Wow, "most of the debris BOOSTS biodiversity."
I know that plastic won't...
EgaoNoGenki 2 years ago
I think Australia has done a simular study a couple of years
TravvyG 2 years ago
Poor Prawns
paulusmagirl 2 years ago 2
"trash increases biodiveristy....an artillery shell...."
just wait until some octopus starts fiddling with the primer....
Paxmax 2 years ago 3
I guess
but then again, that joke isn't too funny considering they aren't saying the trash is good....
NwZ2 2 years ago
i am more worried about the chemical waste that we pump into our oceans such as pesticides, phosphates and petroleum distillates.
subwoofspeak 2 years ago 3
@subwoofspeak Here in the Faroe Islands where whaling (in a humane way, not barbaric murder) is common, the whale blubber is almost uneatable due to chemical waste dumped by, well, you and me.
themightychickens 2 years ago
well, looks like it is a blessing in disguise after all
subwoofspeak 2 years ago
What's the function of the laser points that are visible throughout the video?
Mattinmotion 2 years ago
Perhaps to help with depth perception.
Puissance 2 years ago
I think if I got to choose a job I would like to be a scientist, like marine or something. To me, this would be a evry day vaccation, sure paperwork but a bareable ammount of it. And you earn enough to travel the world around 10 times by just working a month... sweet
Sodorii 2 years ago
@Sodorii
So why not become a scientist?
okeeffdp 2 years ago
My destiny is placed in front of the computer sir/ma'am.
Born computer nerd, with license to be geek!
Sodorii 2 years ago
yea i seen it all the time small sea animals clinging on or swimging near too this rubbish as it offers protection in a big ocean full of bigger things that like the taste of those smaller things just goes to show that one mans trash is anothers gold!
seashithead 2 years ago
This is nice example of how Nature doesn't care about what humans think is good or dangerous for it.
kasuha 2 years ago
adj Yeah, but that's not "underwater" trash, cause as you said, it's an island of trash and thus on the surface. That'sliterally a huge problem in the Pacific, that island of plastic! It pollutes, it kills animals, organisms and it will demand huge resources to get rid of it, billions and billions and billions it will cost
winterstellar 2 years ago
The thing about that "island" of trash is that it's not literally an island. It's a higher than normal concentration of small plastic particles. Still harmful, but not exactly something where they could just take a net out and start scooping up rubbish.
jhamaker 2 years ago
@jhamaker S¤#t, that maybe makes it even more harmful, then? Since those small particles so easily comes into organisms, fishes, whales and so on? And a more difficult problem to get rid of because you can't just scoop it up, as you said? Ouch, sounds horrible.: (
winterstellar 2 years ago
Yeah ok, next you'll be saying toxic waste is helpful to sealife. What a joke! It is only January the 12th not Apil the 1st.
fatalist6o9 2 years ago
Are you blind ? or just so full of yourself you can't see.
mcgaugh57 2 years ago
Can you read? Or are you just too eager to try and be a smart ass? You seem to be the blind one, I said toxic waste. It is being dumped in the sea but it is not mentioned in this video. A small amount of footage, of a small carefully selected area is not a clear representation of the affect of waste in the oceans. Do you know how big the oceans are? Not everything you watch on here is entirely truthful.
fatalist6o9 2 years ago
It is pure idiocy to suppose that sea life did not function quite perfectly and normally before a load of trash was dumped in its environment.
fatalist6o9 2 years ago 3