U People don't know why it is called "Strategy", do u?Ra3 is fun because it requires tactics and strategies to win an enemy.Even if u have like dozen giga foretresses u will still be knock out by MIGs and Apollo fighters,and also u have sidebar powers which are useful to destroy superweapons from long range.U still have to use abilities to infest,shrink,diable weapons, air mode,groungmode,etc plus high,beautiful graphic. It is a true "Strategy Game" ever that cnc made!!!This why they call "RTS"
The reason why the quality is different in RA2 and RA3 is cause RA2 was by westwood studios, then, RA3 was by EA, the quality may seem different, but the game's still fun. plus, RA2 you can use tesla tanks in MP mode unlike RA3.
I play this on the 360, still do to this day. They did a great job on the controls, it's amazing how simple an RTS game can be played on 360 once you get the hang of it. One minor annoyance though: When I fast build units from a structure in the dial-menu, it should let me place the RALLY POINT via DIAL-MENU too! Instead, I have to click on the actual building to give it a new rally point which is annoying!
I have to say I love playing as the allies, but DAMN I wish they had a freaking crane, they build so slow, but somehow, once you build your base, its pretty satisfying... until during the fifteen minutes you've been building your base the Soviets or Rising Sun have captured all the other resources and have changed all that ore goodness into Blimps (forgot how to spell its real name) and Shogun Battleships. And promptly turn your baseinto a crader in twenty seconds. *tear*
more people play ra 2 online (this year)than ra 3..and ra 1 !!sold more than ra2 OR ra 3.food for thought..I own all 3 tho..Just stating the cruel facts.
Yes, it is the most balanced for sure. And most fun ,likely?that is arguable. It just terrible that it was the first Red alert with an *offline expansion-aka new units you cant use-, and for the crazy people thinking is the fastest, wow, just wow. Never played Red alert 1 online huh?And the network system used in MP is pretty terrible-and i think thats why there are so few games going on in red alert 3.
AcesHigh59 u know for a console rts RA3 is actually pretty good. The interface is fine for basic move attack and build commands, and just okay for more advanced commands, and the unti cap Is only annoying if u like to build lots if infantry. Obvoiisly pc owns bc it's pc but if u can't afford a fancy pc then xbox is a decent solution, especially if you have slot of friends that play it.
i had this on xbox but its crap with 50 unit cap and although u get used to xbox controller its not as easy as a mouse and all factions rule it depends on how u use them and on wat map i think. plus u dont get user maps on xbox =(
people like ra2 because they are not smart.ra2 victory depends on the ammount of units and who is going to fire first but ra3 victory depends on strategies and special abbilites.in ra2 the apocalypse tank could beat every other tank but here it can get owned by a tesla trooper!ra2 is a game were u dont need skill u just need more units.ra3 graphics are awsome.ra3 has more units because ra2 has 9 countries but al allies have the same units and all soviets too.so ra3 has a variety of units too
Apparently players on the PC version are alot better than console players, I dont know whether this is true or not but looking at some of these videos, even i'd rape people online but thats just based from observing, I could be wrong
@LegendaryPhenom gotta giv RA2 its dues tho for a 13 yr old game it hung in there for a long time! i still play every night u cant deny that it was kickass for a long time
@Diversity212 You do realize Westwood is no more right? EA already took over their games, and butchered this one to high hell. C&C4 was their worst. RA3 is a close second. They are moving from base play to a WH40k type deal with just a few units. And to all you idiots who say this is a good game because of graphics, console games have warped your fucking minds to think that graphics = Good game play. That is not true at all. Go play RA2 then come back and compare the game play. Till then, Stfu..
@ilikepiedontu dude your stupid to think that everybody who has a console thinks graphics=a good game. sure graphics are nice and all but for an rts game like this that doesn't really matter. i mean the only reason i wouldn't get a game based on graphics is if it litereally looked like shit and it was pixilated all the time. to back me up i have the game crisis 2 coming out soon. that game looks really really pretty and all with its super graphics but i can already tell that the games gonna suck
@ilikepiedontu Old red dalert fans who probably never played any other rts games say that Red Alert 3 Sucks. Don't judge the game after you play few campaigns. You won't realize how great it is until you fully understand the game.
I have played ra1 when i was a kid, then I got ra2 and the campaigns were HELL lot of fun. Then I got Ra3 and campaigns were not surprisingly fun but the multiplayer .....thats when I realized that ra3 is the best out of the series.
@photon101203 Yeah your right people are going to hate you for it because you think Graphics = a good game, which is not true at all. Learn your shit, and think before you type next time. RA2 is faster and is about massing out units to over take your opponent. This is slower than RA2 by far.. You may like it more, but you are only a minority against the majority who hate this game. Only you and 10 other retards would agree with what you said. I'll have hundreds more to back me up...
@ilikepiedontu i like how you said that only 10 other "retards" would back him up yet on the video for Ra3 Which you are also watching there are 37 likes for it while theres only 1 dislike to it. to me that seems like 37 to 1 one being you who is fighting a losing battle here
@ilikepiedontu Wtf? dude you think massing out units (spamming) is what makes a rts great?
Spamming is fuking stupid, no macromanagement , no tactics just build and send and kill.
In red alert 3 spamming is not very used, lets say that you have a mirage tank spam, you can counter it with air, and sea. It's necessary to play the game with more strategy than producing and sending units.
If you played any other RTS you will notice that Ra3 is pretty fast paced. You will have no one to back you up.
@photon101203 2000 vs 2008 dude stick your finger into ur ass.... u cant compare these two games look at those Release date..... RA2 is old good game and lot of people like old graphic/games..... mby RA2 is old but still in our hearts.... IMO RA2 IS BETTER..... RA3 IS GREAT GAME TOO
@photon101203 If you have played Red Alert 2 from the day it existed than you would understand why people say Red Alert 2 is better.I don't blame you.Because unlike you I play Red Alert 2 for 11 years from the day it existed.Maybe it looks like a crap but its not about the graphics its all about having fun for Red Alert 2 (online ) players! I like Red Alert 3.I have it only for Playstation3 and this looks a lot different than mine.The only thing is that Command points.It sucks. Thx for the vid
@photon101203 RA 2 is way more realistic and I just like it, you create an army in RA2 not bunch of toys and bears! so if they just could modify RA2 to RA3 it you'll see what I mean
@photon101203 I ALMOST fully agree with you. Red Alert 2 is NOT slow, skirmishes have a setting that makes games faster, it has better balancing of forces, and good ways of fighting.
at 4:00 min if he had loaded his IFV's with javelin troops, and then unloaded them so they could laser lock on buildings his rush would've been a bit more effective
i am using an imac 21.5 inch with 4gb of ram and nvidia geforce 9400m. Will i be able to play the game, and on which settings. If you know is there a mac demo for red alert 3.
wow i thought it said proz....this game doesn't have any pro players....orange just looks good because his counter enemy sucks really really bad....soviets should NEVER EVER NEVER EVER be fucked up by allies when it comes to tanks...when i see 3 flak troopers chasing that multigunner i was like WTF? no sickles? no drones? no nothing?
if you wanna play this game with full graphics get the xbox 360 version you dont have to worry about ram and memory and graphics cards. Base building isn't slow either they have a whole new interface designed for the 360 so it is just as fast as the pc and i have played the pc version
too right cactus ive been playing console games fir nine years and i can build fast as hell with the cintroller the circle menu makes ut all the more easier
Still i would rather play with downgraded graphics on a pc and have the freedom of using a mouse. Plus i hate the idea of not being able to move the cursor independent from the camera. PC VERSION ALL THE WAY!
@ThisNameIsNotUsed I doubt many people would disagree that the PC verion is better, however I played commanders challenge on Xbox as well and it controls surprisingly well for an RTS on a console. (and it looks better but that is my PC's fault. lol)
@ThisNameIsNotUsed I sorta have to agree with you on that, I used to play alot of AoE on the PC a few years ago, then I got a 360 and played C&C Kane's Wrath and RE3, and it was a hell of a lot easier to click on the map to quickly respond to a situation or select a group that is in danger. It's such a pain in the ass to try to slowly scroll across the battlefield on the 360 back to your base to stop that one damn Blimp from destroying your base, just too lose your army and 1/2 your base.
Red alert 2 is OLD.
Ezekyle23 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
U People don't know why it is called "Strategy", do u?Ra3 is fun because it requires tactics and strategies to win an enemy.Even if u have like dozen giga foretresses u will still be knock out by MIGs and Apollo fighters,and also u have sidebar powers which are useful to destroy superweapons from long range.U still have to use abilities to infest,shrink,diable weapons, air mode,groungmode,etc plus high,beautiful graphic. It is a true "Strategy Game" ever that cnc made!!!This why they call "RTS"
BlizzardGear 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
BlizzardGear 2 weeks ago
a shame that the quality sucks :/
framerunner1987 1 month ago
The reason why the quality is different in RA2 and RA3 is cause RA2 was by westwood studios, then, RA3 was by EA, the quality may seem different, but the game's still fun. plus, RA2 you can use tesla tanks in MP mode unlike RA3.
Soran39 1 month ago
i didnt ask to watch a noob game
Yui111Yui 2 months ago
@Yui111Yui You dont need to tell us that you play like a noob.
ZacharyXiao252 1 month ago
I play this on the 360, still do to this day. They did a great job on the controls, it's amazing how simple an RTS game can be played on 360 once you get the hang of it. One minor annoyance though: When I fast build units from a structure in the dial-menu, it should let me place the RALLY POINT via DIAL-MENU too! Instead, I have to click on the actual building to give it a new rally point which is annoying!
SlowDaddie 2 months ago
I have to say I love playing as the allies, but DAMN I wish they had a freaking crane, they build so slow, but somehow, once you build your base, its pretty satisfying... until during the fifteen minutes you've been building your base the Soviets or Rising Sun have captured all the other resources and have changed all that ore goodness into Blimps (forgot how to spell its real name) and Shogun Battleships. And promptly turn your baseinto a crader in twenty seconds. *tear*
OneFourtyOneDA 5 months ago
more people play ra 2 online (this year)than ra 3..and ra 1 !!sold more than ra2 OR ra 3.food for thought..I own all 3 tho..Just stating the cruel facts.
intro94 6 months ago
@intro94
Facts and fun alone, RA2 was and still GG but RA3 is WAY better, way more balanced and way more fun, MP specially.
LegendaryPhenom 6 months ago
@LegendaryPhenom
Yes, it is the most balanced for sure. And most fun ,likely?that is arguable. It just terrible that it was the first Red alert with an *offline expansion-aka new units you cant use-, and for the crazy people thinking is the fastest, wow, just wow. Never played Red alert 1 online huh?And the network system used in MP is pretty terrible-and i think thats why there are so few games going on in red alert 3.
intro94 6 months ago
you guys really suck at microing.
ghostfase 7 months ago
hehe soviet rush never fails
subzero5ghost 9 months ago
I got one question, in the others red alert, the gold will get empty... do this happend in this one?
WilmorAMP 10 months ago
@WilmorAMP
Yes
LegendaryPhenom 10 months ago
@LegendaryPhenom thanks
WilmorAMP 10 months ago
@LegendaryPhenom is this game alot better then red alert 2? can you do a 3v3 in this game.
itsmybunny1 8 months ago
@itsmybunny1
In my opinion ra3 is the best cnc, and yes u can do 3v3 but not as rank match, just a custom one.
LegendaryPhenom 8 months ago
no you cant run out
Inforification 7 months ago
wow..nice pc for a high-end graphics game =D
speedbreaker100 11 months ago
I love Red Alert 2 but i like 3 2;D
themuz1n 11 months ago
does anyone play this on the xbox 360 cause there is no-one to play -_- add my gamertag if you do- JAnderton123
joshincrediable 1 year ago
AcesHigh59 u know for a console rts RA3 is actually pretty good. The interface is fine for basic move attack and build commands, and just okay for more advanced commands, and the unti cap Is only annoying if u like to build lots if infantry. Obvoiisly pc owns bc it's pc but if u can't afford a fancy pc then xbox is a decent solution, especially if you have slot of friends that play it.
ellipsis117 1 year ago
i hate wen ppl build into ur base itss sooo annoying
devellstear 1 year ago
i had this on xbox but its crap with 50 unit cap and although u get used to xbox controller its not as easy as a mouse and all factions rule it depends on how u use them and on wat map i think. plus u dont get user maps on xbox =(
AcesHigh59 1 year ago
I remember when the soviets used to be good. :(
casdebom2 1 year ago
You know if you take that oil refinery you'll make more money.
balcombrian 1 year ago
I really wish the xbox didn't have a unit cap, or it has to be higher than 50.
ellipsis117 1 year ago
i love this water :)
trytojustify 1 year ago
can i play this game online with my friends on xbox live?
and if i can, how many can play
SkinShot24 1 year ago
map?
TH3EPICLUST 1 year ago
Your really good but why don't you have high quality :(
OriginalGamer1998 1 year ago
when i do an online match i chose empire of the rising sun.
CeMDRAGONify 1 year ago
people like ra2 because they are not smart.ra2 victory depends on the ammount of units and who is going to fire first but ra3 victory depends on strategies and special abbilites.in ra2 the apocalypse tank could beat every other tank but here it can get owned by a tesla trooper!ra2 is a game were u dont need skill u just need more units.ra3 graphics are awsome.ra3 has more units because ra2 has 9 countries but al allies have the same units and all soviets too.so ra3 has a variety of units too
xxxalexanderyyzz 1 year ago
RA2 yuri's revenge is the best c&c game there is
bobissocoollike 1 year ago
you know that prospectors can expand the alies base right ?
metalgearrexlover 1 year ago
@metalgearrexlover
it useless when playing online, i xpand with mcv cheaper and fast and the tech unlock remains.
LegendaryPhenom 1 year ago 4
@LegendaryPhenom YOU CAN ALSO BUILD A SECOND ONE
mbos14 1 year ago
@LegendaryPhenom if i go some resources left i build a second mcv so i have a second build tab and a easy expand option
mbos14 1 year ago
Apparently players on the PC version are alot better than console players, I dont know whether this is true or not but looking at some of these videos, even i'd rape people online but thats just based from observing, I could be wrong
MrCort1231 1 year ago
RA3 owns RA2!!!!!!!!!!! :D:D
phoenixking321 1 year ago
The really nasty thing about apoc tanks is if they attack ur mcv ur screwed over bc if u pack up ur mcv and try to escape his tanks will eat ur mcv
ellipsis117 1 year ago
Comment removed
molenini 1 year ago
for real, why do people say that RA 2 is better than 3??
RA 2 is Slow..boring and old and looks like crap...
(ohh people are gonna hate me for this :P)
but i like RA 3 way more..
o yeah and the vid was great
photon101203 1 year ago 15
@photon101203
Some people just don't like RA3 graphic at all, so they skip the game.
I played RA2 for 9 years, and RA3 since Nov 2008 and i can say honestly, that RA3 OWNS RA2, ra3 is soo much better than ra2.
LegendaryPhenom 1 year ago 4
@LegendaryPhenom cool, id like to have a game with you :)
you got Hamachi? or tunngle, we can have a game if ya like, since theres like no one ever round :S
photon101203 1 year ago
@photon101203
alright i got hamachi, and if u got Xfire u can feel free to add me: PhenomFX.
LegendaryPhenom 1 year ago
@LegendaryPhenom gotta giv RA2 its dues tho for a 13 yr old game it hung in there for a long time! i still play every night u cant deny that it was kickass for a long time
BEENO132 1 year ago
@LegendaryPhenom I agree, RA 3 is better until the EA takes over. EA is evil, they messed up everything, i dont like their idea.
Diversity212 1 year ago
@Diversity212 True, despite all RA3 was and still amazing game, but i think they haven't realize how great their game is.
LegendaryPhenom 1 year ago
@Diversity212 You do realize Westwood is no more right? EA already took over their games, and butchered this one to high hell. C&C4 was their worst. RA3 is a close second. They are moving from base play to a WH40k type deal with just a few units. And to all you idiots who say this is a good game because of graphics, console games have warped your fucking minds to think that graphics = Good game play. That is not true at all. Go play RA2 then come back and compare the game play. Till then, Stfu..
ilikepiedontu 1 year ago
@ilikepiedontu dude your stupid to think that everybody who has a console thinks graphics=a good game. sure graphics are nice and all but for an rts game like this that doesn't really matter. i mean the only reason i wouldn't get a game based on graphics is if it litereally looked like shit and it was pixilated all the time. to back me up i have the game crisis 2 coming out soon. that game looks really really pretty and all with its super graphics but i can already tell that the games gonna suck
sdf3123 1 year ago
@ilikepiedontu Old red dalert fans who probably never played any other rts games say that Red Alert 3 Sucks. Don't judge the game after you play few campaigns. You won't realize how great it is until you fully understand the game.
I have played ra1 when i was a kid, then I got ra2 and the campaigns were HELL lot of fun. Then I got Ra3 and campaigns were not surprisingly fun but the multiplayer .....thats when I realized that ra3 is the best out of the series.
emotionalpunkboy 11 months ago
@photon101203 its because some people still like's the RA2 unit abilities....better than what in RA3 did....i can feel yah dude...
boyong015 1 year ago
@photon101203
Ra2 is slow because you either have a shit pc or you didnt turn off backbuffer.
Ra2 production quality is 10x better than this game. Sounds are much better, and thats the best the 2D could go than.
Ra2 has a faster and a better game play.
People who say games suck just because they are too fucking lazy to google a solution and just because the graphics are old, are no gamers at all.
Stojke2K9 1 year ago
@photon101203 Yeah your right people are going to hate you for it because you think Graphics = a good game, which is not true at all. Learn your shit, and think before you type next time. RA2 is faster and is about massing out units to over take your opponent. This is slower than RA2 by far.. You may like it more, but you are only a minority against the majority who hate this game. Only you and 10 other retards would agree with what you said. I'll have hundreds more to back me up...
ilikepiedontu 1 year ago
@ilikepiedontu i like how you said that only 10 other "retards" would back him up yet on the video for Ra3 Which you are also watching there are 37 likes for it while theres only 1 dislike to it. to me that seems like 37 to 1 one being you who is fighting a losing battle here
sdf3123 1 year ago
@ilikepiedontu Wtf? dude you think massing out units (spamming) is what makes a rts great?
Spamming is fuking stupid, no macromanagement , no tactics just build and send and kill.
In red alert 3 spamming is not very used, lets say that you have a mirage tank spam, you can counter it with air, and sea. It's necessary to play the game with more strategy than producing and sending units.
If you played any other RTS you will notice that Ra3 is pretty fast paced. You will have no one to back you up.
emotionalpunkboy 11 months ago
@photon101203 It's kind of ironic this is a top comment.
alxg833 10 months ago
@photon101203 2000 vs 2008 dude stick your finger into ur ass.... u cant compare these two games look at those Release date..... RA2 is old good game and lot of people like old graphic/games..... mby RA2 is old but still in our hearts.... IMO RA2 IS BETTER..... RA3 IS GREAT GAME TOO
MegaHank0 10 months ago
@photon101203 people who like ra2 are hipsters. when ra2 came out,people said ra1 was better.
quinnweller 9 months ago
@photon101203 If you have played Red Alert 2 from the day it existed than you would understand why people say Red Alert 2 is better.I don't blame you.Because unlike you I play Red Alert 2 for 11 years from the day it existed.Maybe it looks like a crap but its not about the graphics its all about having fun for Red Alert 2 (online ) players! I like Red Alert 3.I have it only for Playstation3 and this looks a lot different than mine.The only thing is that Command points.It sucks. Thx for the vid
desolator201 8 months ago
@photon101203 RA 2 is way more realistic and I just like it, you create an army in RA2 not bunch of toys and bears! so if they just could modify RA2 to RA3 it you'll see what I mean
MrMagickent 1 month ago
@photon101203 I ALMOST fully agree with you. Red Alert 2 is NOT slow, skirmishes have a setting that makes games faster, it has better balancing of forces, and good ways of fighting.
ZacharyXiao252 1 month ago
lame music, red alert 2 had much better music.
simpleftw 2 years ago
@simpleftw Dude the allied music is sweet. Empire is like...typical Guqin, Japanese string instrument stuff
SnIkLeeT 2 years ago
at 4:00 min if he had loaded his IFV's with javelin troops, and then unloaded them so they could laser lock on buildings his rush would've been a bit more effective
Beachboy2138 2 years ago
I purchased this today on PS3,but no one is online...
LiangHuBBB 2 years ago
@LiangHuBBB add me on PS3, i would love to have someone to play with online, never played it before =D
My PSN account is "Assassinator365"
Assassinator365 2 years ago
i am using an imac 21.5 inch with 4gb of ram and nvidia geforce 9400m. Will i be able to play the game, and on which settings. If you know is there a mac demo for red alert 3.
Manga0wns 2 years ago
No, it worse than HD4850 by large margin, but it should RA3 very fine.
LegendaryPhenom 2 years ago
ATI Radeon HD4850.
LegendaryPhenom 2 years ago
to bad that it is futuristic..... would be cool if it was more real like the first one..either way.. is this shit worth buying ?
pbmodig 2 years ago
for me, ra3 is better than ra2, so yes
LegendaryPhenom 2 years ago
thx, ill might get it than :)
pbmodig 2 years ago
horrible bear micro in the beginning there by the soviet player. clearly has no clue.
quikijiki 2 years ago
wow i thought it said proz....this game doesn't have any pro players....orange just looks good because his counter enemy sucks really really bad....soviets should NEVER EVER NEVER EVER be fucked up by allies when it comes to tanks...when i see 3 flak troopers chasing that multigunner i was like WTF? no sickles? no drones? no nothing?
Myoldnamesdontwork 2 years ago
he didnt build a war factory early, the soviet guy went for air...
jackuy12345 2 years ago
What I like about this is they kept alot of the old sound affects from number two.
MasterGamer123sas 2 years ago
cactus you are a tool....pc is the best way to play rts games and fps too....you'd get owned by keyboard and mouse!
mlink98 2 years ago 7
i think what he meant is for people who dont have a good video card its better to play on Xbox...that is...if u have an Xbox
Myoldnamesdontwork 2 years ago
you can get bluetooth key board and mouse for the console...
stz44 2 years ago
@stz44 no offence but that is such awaste of money... besides it wont change the layout of the game on ps3, the wont suddenly be a cursor etr.
kibaXxXhinata 2 years ago
@KibaXxXhinata,
well if you cant play this on ultra high on your pc, but you do like mouse and keyboard..
Apprentice18195 2 years ago
@mlink98 you are so wrong.just joking.a keyboard is a faster way to play such games
xxxalexanderyyzz 1 year ago
if you wanna play this game with full graphics get the xbox 360 version you dont have to worry about ram and memory and graphics cards. Base building isn't slow either they have a whole new interface designed for the 360 so it is just as fast as the pc and i have played the pc version
thekingofcactus 2 years ago
unit limit
TALOS7887 2 years ago
too right cactus ive been playing console games fir nine years and i can build fast as hell with the cintroller the circle menu makes ut all the more easier
jfhgksjdhfk 2 years ago
Still i would rather play with downgraded graphics on a pc and have the freedom of using a mouse. Plus i hate the idea of not being able to move the cursor independent from the camera. PC VERSION ALL THE WAY!
ThisNameIsNotUsed 2 years ago 24
its not as bad as you think :P
LuisRC91 2 years ago
i agree, it's actually pretty amusant, and the water is actually very well made =D
Assassinator365 2 years ago
@ThisNameIsNotUsed I doubt many people would disagree that the PC verion is better, however I played commanders challenge on Xbox as well and it controls surprisingly well for an RTS on a console. (and it looks better but that is my PC's fault. lol)
Al0neStillAlive 1 year ago
@ThisNameIsNotUsed I sorta have to agree with you on that, I used to play alot of AoE on the PC a few years ago, then I got a 360 and played C&C Kane's Wrath and RE3, and it was a hell of a lot easier to click on the map to quickly respond to a situation or select a group that is in danger. It's such a pain in the ass to try to slowly scroll across the battlefield on the 360 back to your base to stop that one damn Blimp from destroying your base, just too lose your army and 1/2 your base.
OneFourtyOneDA 5 months ago
what's your graphics card?
SakonShima582 2 years ago
ATI Radeon HD4850.
LegendaryPhenom 2 years ago
kay thnx... :D
SakonShima582 2 years ago
wow really ?
I'm ATI HD 4650 But it's work really good on Ultra high
flookzakub7 2 years ago
How many FPS you get with the 4850?
agearmaster1 2 years ago
steady 31 FPS, limit of the game engine.
LegendaryPhenom 2 years ago
you are comfusing me are you blue or orange
phoenixking321 2 years ago
Orange.
LegendaryPhenom 2 years ago
i wish i could play this on my labtop.
darkedgekilla 2 years ago
I wish mine could run on those settings but im to cheap and lazy to get a better graphics card
Iceman0796 2 years ago
No need to be lazy, i bought HD4850 just to put AA on that game on my T220 monitor.
LegendaryPhenom 2 years ago
I fixed mine the cheapest and laziest way. I run it in windowed mode.
Iceman0796 2 years ago
good allies herassement
darkboyBE 2 years ago
wow fast comment!!! thanx, and yes this video still being processed , it should be on HD quality while it's done.
Uploading next part right now, though it might take some time.
LegendaryPhenom 2 years ago
Are you using gamecam ?
Deyan65 2 years ago
No fraps, but it getting slow the more units u build.
How is gamecam?
LegendaryPhenom 2 years ago
Gamecam is bad , a total waste of money ! Now i'm with FRAPS
Deyan65 2 years ago
i once used it, didn't like it at all!! FRAPS is the way to go, now my goal is to record with no lag, but it isn't possible.
LegendaryPhenom 2 years ago
1st comment 1st rating 1st view !! I bet it's still processed ! I hope the quality gets better
Deyan65 2 years ago