you state that 2 facts are; 1, everybody will die, and 2 Everybody will be resurrected and judged. now correct me if i'm wrong but doesn't that mean you would of have to known someone who was resurrected or there being evidence supporting this statement to actually make it a "Fact" Sorry but even if you are religious it will still remain a theory not a definitive fact. Btw i'm atheist :D No offence to other religions
@danthevick I'm not religious either, but I see what you're saying. I cannot prove it to you, but it's been proven to me spiritually. It's hard to explain, but if you're born again of the Spirit, then you know that there is a resurrection. You're able to see that it's impossible for there to not be a God and for there to not be a resurrection. You probably think you'll never be born again, but it can still happen to you. Thank you for your cordial reply.
@SusannaChelcias so why would anyone decide to listen to your claims if you cant prove them?? the only real proof we have is that giving women the choice has the most beneficial outcome for society, so it stands to reason we make decisions based on that evidence... not the supernatural, superstitious claims of a single person.
@scottpastry No worries. I'm not one of those over zealous types. According to scripture, contraception is only a sin unto death when it's used in a Levirate marriage before the husband has created a baby for his deceased brother.
@SusannaChelcias yeah and according to scripture, leprosy is treated with animal sacrifice....... and rape victims should submit to their rapist for marriage....... completely redundant, thats why we pay less and less attention to it.
@scottpastry said "rape victims should submit to their rapist for marriage" ~~~~~~~~~~ "FORCE her" (Deu 22v25) FORCE = chazaq This is rape. If she is betrothed or married: rapist was stoned to death. If she is neither betrothed nor married: not in Torah. "LAY HOLD on her" (Deu 22v28) LAY HOLD = taphas This is consensual intercourse. In this case, they would marry. But her father could refuse to give her to him (Exo 22v16-17).
@scottpastry KJV + Strong's concordance. The words I cited ("chazaq" and "taphas") are the original Aramaic words. This is one of those cases where the English translation can be a little misleading.
@SusannaChelcias "This is one of those cases where the English translation can be a little misleading."
interesting......
KJV 2 Samual 12 : 11
Thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thine own house, and I will take thy wives before thine eyes, and give them unto thy neighbour, and he shall lie with thy wives in the sight of this sun.
not only can this not be consensual.... your god is delivering the rape victims to the rapists.
you state that 2 facts are; 1, everybody will die, and 2 Everybody will be resurrected and judged. now correct me if i'm wrong but doesn't that mean you would of have to known someone who was resurrected or there being evidence supporting this statement to actually make it a "Fact" Sorry but even if you are religious it will still remain a theory not a definitive fact. Btw i'm atheist :D No offence to other religions
danthevick 5 months ago
@danthevick I'm not religious either, but I see what you're saying. I cannot prove it to you, but it's been proven to me spiritually. It's hard to explain, but if you're born again of the Spirit, then you know that there is a resurrection. You're able to see that it's impossible for there to not be a God and for there to not be a resurrection. You probably think you'll never be born again, but it can still happen to you. Thank you for your cordial reply.
SusannaChelcias 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
prove we will be judged after death.
scottpastry 1 year ago 2
@scottpastry Prove the future? Can't do that until the future comes, and by then, it'll be too late to change the present.
SusannaChelcias 1 year ago
@SusannaChelcias so why would anyone decide to listen to your claims if you cant prove them?? the only real proof we have is that giving women the choice has the most beneficial outcome for society, so it stands to reason we make decisions based on that evidence... not the supernatural, superstitious claims of a single person.
scottpastry 1 year ago
@scottpastry said, "most beneficial outcome for society"
I think the unborn members of society would disagree with that assessment.
SusannaChelcias 1 year ago
@SusannaChelcias fetuses are members of society now?? hmmmmmm......... i suppose you wanna give human rights to sperm too??
scottpastry 1 year ago
@scottpastry No worries. I'm not one of those over zealous types. According to scripture, contraception is only a sin unto death when it's used in a Levirate marriage before the husband has created a baby for his deceased brother.
SusannaChelcias 1 year ago
@SusannaChelcias yeah and according to scripture, leprosy is treated with animal sacrifice....... and rape victims should submit to their rapist for marriage....... completely redundant, thats why we pay less and less attention to it.
scottpastry 1 year ago
SusannaChelcias 1 year ago
@SusannaChelcias what bible are you using??
scottpastry 1 year ago
@scottpastry KJV + Strong's concordance. The words I cited ("chazaq" and "taphas") are the original Aramaic words. This is one of those cases where the English translation can be a little misleading.
SusannaChelcias 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SusannaChelcias "This is one of those cases where the English translation can be a little misleading."
interesting......
KJV 2 Samual 12 : 11
Thus saith the LORD, Behold, I will raise up evil against thee out of thine own house, and I will take thy wives before thine eyes, and give them unto thy neighbour, and he shall lie with thy wives in the sight of this sun.
not only can this not be consensual.... your god is delivering the rape victims to the rapists.
scottpastry 1 year ago