Too Much tennis ball noises stehi graff and baroness cobra playing racquetball
with Hitler! Too Much Young sherlock holmes hearing flue noise call in Demon Balde Wii Preview Team! I have a kaballha knee not silat-cheetah! goto James brown is dead tribute and yelling on top of rave! Sounds allah or arabic spitting music! Not Katie Oswego, IL want Kurt Cobain to spit in her mouth while in concert! Seems Dead Bioshock Infinity + Deus Ex 2 Invisible War Loss!
Too Much tennis ball noises stehi graff and baroness cobra playing racquetball
with Hitler! Too Much Young sherlock holmes hearing flue noise call in Demon Balde Wii Preview Team! I have a kaballha knee not silat-cheetah! goto James brown is dead tribute and yelling on top of rave! Sounds allah or arabic spitting music! Not Katie Oswego, IL want Kurt Cobain to spit in her mouth while in concert!
Is anyone using one of these in a Slot A Athlon motherboard? I'm thinking of picking up a Slot A Athlon 650 system from a friend and want to know if this card will work with it first.
this and my voodoo 5500 are my 2 favourite cards from the windows 98 dos based gaming era.
both cards legendary and the best hardware to come out, sadly they got hammerd by the (religious?) reviews of geforce nvidia, who's overall performance i find poorer, espesically video playback.
i thought matrox was better, but you needed a good cpu or fps would drop because they were more cpu dependant.
but by the time you scaled up to 1ghz cpu i felt the matrox 450, ati maxx & 3dfx 5500, performed better
@cant1rac the processors of the day were averaging between 300mhz and 550mhz on the average home pc, so the nvidia did post better numbers, and at the time there was some question over how much the nvidia driver had been tailored to specifically give better number in a few well known tests rather than real life performance.
but generally the numbers hold up, scaling above 750mhz, i find most of the competition start to come up to or better nvidia's in game performance.
@cant1rac matrox was very cpu scalable and was limited by the cpu's of the day.
its video playback gaming quality, 2d quality and video playback (ati as well).
had a tnt2 then a geforce 2 and cursed them.
do anything other than play a 32bit color game it had nothing to offer, try playing flash video file, a quick time video, you realised it was only a one trick pony, image quality lack of shadows detail and pastel tint colors annoyed as well, despite offering high resolution
-i tested the card in a gigabyte K7 board with via KT400, it was not worked (w98, me).
-i checked the card in some unknown via chipet with socket 7 with a pentium 1, it was not worked (w98, me)
-it was not worked in k7s5a with SiS 735 chipset (w98, me)
I dont remember to other boards, i tested in a few, it was only worked me in motherboards with BX chipset. I dont know my fury maxx's version but its maybee a very first one becouse it has no jumper to disable the secondary graphics core.
I just finished building a system today for old school dx7 games using a PIII 1.4 celeron,512mb pc100 system ram and my original Rage Fury max.Plays NFS3 awesome!!
this card was so powerfull and so ahead of its time that most motherboards could not suport it. and more intell boards did not except it cus thay used diferent speeds for thare agp then standered. and beleve it or not thare are drivers for this for vista and 7 and on vista it can just handle moderen warfair 2
@vorkev1 from the late ninties, no t&l capablity, 64mb ram but shared between 2 gpu's so not a true 64 output, same as the 3dfx voodoo 5500, i own both cards.
card was powerful for its day but no t&l it severely limited its potential (mordern warfare 2 is an impossiblity)
impossible to run an ati rage fury maxx on anything but windows me or 98, because its impossible to utilise both cores in an nt based kernal (2000, xp, vista, 7) so the card just works on one gpu making it a 32mb rage fury
@vorkev1 main problem was incompatablity with a substansial number of chipsets, and i find it works best on a bx format board, drivers were tempramental as well.
some agp sockets just dont like it as well, even though listed as compatable, after my old bx intel board died, i gave it up for dead, 6 boards till i found one it worked on.
got 2d fine installed windows 98se, then rebooting after installing the drivers, no screen and could only get a display in safe mode, 6th board (a bx) worked fine
@vorkev1 i've been a looking for a good 4 years for a back up card, cause i love my rage fury maxx, dvd play back is the best you'll get on a 98se machine.
but ive not seen any, for a number of reasons
1. sold badly, was expensive competeing with a faster performing 3dfx 5500 that supported windows 2000, and the new geforce that had t&l, that were far more competively priced.
2. the poor drivers and chipset support, there are alot scrapped and left for dead when infact they are still working
Hi. It not works in all motherboard. Only 1/5 of them. I was able to run it sucesfully in a Gigabyte 6bxd, so motherboards with BX chipset may mostly work. I tested it with a few VIA and SiS chipset motherboards too, but none of them worked.
@Ireg88 The rage fury maxx will work on most motherboards that are AGP 1.0/2.0 and has motherboard drivers for windows 98.yes some via and sis chipsets sucked and it would give problems..But very rare.Iam curently using a Rage Fury Maxx on an Intel Pentium III 1.4\512MB pc100 ram and have used this card in many via chipset mobos over teh years and have yet to have any issues..vids soon
@Ireg88 From my experience with thE card over thE years i have had no luck with anything higher then a PIII cpu/motherboard..p4's have yet to work and i have never been able to get the card to work on athlon/althlonXP chip sets..Ill have video of my Fury Maxx build this coming week.
Intel D815EEA2
Intel PIII 1.2/256/133 Tualatin
512mb pc-133 ram
Windows 98SE with exuberent software service pack and fixes
Too Much tennis ball noises stehi graff and baroness cobra playing racquetball
with Hitler! Too Much Young sherlock holmes hearing flue noise call in Demon Balde Wii Preview Team! I have a kaballha knee not silat-cheetah! goto James brown is dead tribute and yelling on top of rave! Sounds allah or arabic spitting music! Not Katie Oswego, IL want Kurt Cobain to spit in her mouth while in concert! Seems Dead Bioshock Infinity + Deus Ex 2 Invisible War Loss!
GeckoDude2010 4 months ago
Too Much tennis ball noises stehi graff and baroness cobra playing racquetball
with Hitler! Too Much Young sherlock holmes hearing flue noise call in Demon Balde Wii Preview Team! I have a kaballha knee not silat-cheetah! goto James brown is dead tribute and yelling on top of rave! Sounds allah or arabic spitting music! Not Katie Oswego, IL want Kurt Cobain to spit in her mouth while in concert!
GeckoDude2010 4 months ago
Is anyone using one of these in a Slot A Athlon motherboard? I'm thinking of picking up a Slot A Athlon 650 system from a friend and want to know if this card will work with it first.
gamewizard 8 months ago
this and my voodoo 5500 are my 2 favourite cards from the windows 98 dos based gaming era.
both cards legendary and the best hardware to come out, sadly they got hammerd by the (religious?) reviews of geforce nvidia, who's overall performance i find poorer, espesically video playback.
i thought matrox was better, but you needed a good cpu or fps would drop because they were more cpu dependant.
but by the time you scaled up to 1ghz cpu i felt the matrox 450, ati maxx & 3dfx 5500, performed better
cant1rac 11 months ago
@cant1rac the processors of the day were averaging between 300mhz and 550mhz on the average home pc, so the nvidia did post better numbers, and at the time there was some question over how much the nvidia driver had been tailored to specifically give better number in a few well known tests rather than real life performance.
but generally the numbers hold up, scaling above 750mhz, i find most of the competition start to come up to or better nvidia's in game performance.
cant1rac 11 months ago
@cant1rac matrox was very cpu scalable and was limited by the cpu's of the day.
its video playback gaming quality, 2d quality and video playback (ati as well).
had a tnt2 then a geforce 2 and cursed them.
do anything other than play a 32bit color game it had nothing to offer, try playing flash video file, a quick time video, you realised it was only a one trick pony, image quality lack of shadows detail and pastel tint colors annoyed as well, despite offering high resolution
cant1rac 11 months ago
okay
-i tested the card in a gigabyte K7 board with via KT400, it was not worked (w98, me).
-i checked the card in some unknown via chipet with socket 7 with a pentium 1, it was not worked (w98, me)
-it was not worked in k7s5a with SiS 735 chipset (w98, me)
I dont remember to other boards, i tested in a few, it was only worked me in motherboards with BX chipset. I dont know my fury maxx's version but its maybee a very first one becouse it has no jumper to disable the secondary graphics core.
Ireg88 1 year ago
@Ireg88 I have the Rage fury maxx workiing with the following setup
Intel PII Tualatin 1.2/256/133
Intel 815EEA2
512MB pc-133
Aureal A3d (8820)Sound card
40gb WD400 HD
500w Coolmax PSU
TheDman216 9 months ago
I just finished building a system today for old school dx7 games using a PIII 1.4 celeron,512mb pc100 system ram and my original Rage Fury max.Plays NFS3 awesome!!
TheDman216 1 year ago
this card was so powerfull and so ahead of its time that most motherboards could not suport it. and more intell boards did not except it cus thay used diferent speeds for thare agp then standered. and beleve it or not thare are drivers for this for vista and 7 and on vista it can just handle moderen warfair 2
vorkev1 2 years ago
@vorkev1 from the late ninties, no t&l capablity, 64mb ram but shared between 2 gpu's so not a true 64 output, same as the 3dfx voodoo 5500, i own both cards.
card was powerful for its day but no t&l it severely limited its potential (mordern warfare 2 is an impossiblity)
impossible to run an ati rage fury maxx on anything but windows me or 98, because its impossible to utilise both cores in an nt based kernal (2000, xp, vista, 7) so the card just works on one gpu making it a 32mb rage fury
cant1rac 11 months ago
@vorkev1 main problem was incompatablity with a substansial number of chipsets, and i find it works best on a bx format board, drivers were tempramental as well.
some agp sockets just dont like it as well, even though listed as compatable, after my old bx intel board died, i gave it up for dead, 6 boards till i found one it worked on.
got 2d fine installed windows 98se, then rebooting after installing the drivers, no screen and could only get a display in safe mode, 6th board (a bx) worked fine
cant1rac 11 months ago
@vorkev1 i've been a looking for a good 4 years for a back up card, cause i love my rage fury maxx, dvd play back is the best you'll get on a 98se machine.
but ive not seen any, for a number of reasons
1. sold badly, was expensive competeing with a faster performing 3dfx 5500 that supported windows 2000, and the new geforce that had t&l, that were far more competively priced.
2. the poor drivers and chipset support, there are alot scrapped and left for dead when infact they are still working
cant1rac 11 months ago
have you tried making the card display in xp? My screen went blank after window boot up screen. thanks.
doct0rthrill 2 years ago
Hi. It not works in all motherboard. Only 1/5 of them. I was able to run it sucesfully in a Gigabyte 6bxd, so motherboards with BX chipset may mostly work. I tested it with a few VIA and SiS chipset motherboards too, but none of them worked.
Ireg88 2 years ago
Thanks. I have an ASUS p5a with an acer aladdin chipset. maybe this is the reason.
doct0rthrill 2 years ago
@Ireg88 The rage fury maxx will work on most motherboards that are AGP 1.0/2.0 and has motherboard drivers for windows 98.yes some via and sis chipsets sucked and it would give problems..But very rare.Iam curently using a Rage Fury Maxx on an Intel Pentium III 1.4\512MB pc100 ram and have used this card in many via chipset mobos over teh years and have yet to have any issues..vids soon
TheDman216 1 year ago
@Ireg88 From my experience with thE card over thE years i have had no luck with anything higher then a PIII cpu/motherboard..p4's have yet to work and i have never been able to get the card to work on athlon/althlonXP chip sets..Ill have video of my Fury Maxx build this coming week.
Intel D815EEA2
Intel PIII 1.2/256/133 Tualatin
512mb pc-133 ram
Windows 98SE with exuberent software service pack and fixes
maxtor 40GB HD
ATI Rage Fury Maxx
Onboard sound(Cadenza Soundmax)
TheDman216 1 month ago
where did you get a driver for it? I downloaded a few for my win me machine, but none works right.
doct0rthrill 2 years ago
i have one of those cards
PsilocybinDream 2 years ago
its not possible to write correct drivers becouse of the shittyness of 2k based kernels agp enumeration.
Ireg88 2 years ago
WE NEED A NEW DRIVER FOR 2000 and UP with support for BOTH GPUs
:( :( :(
Kaitou1988 2 years ago
It's cool man~~~
Where is the Voodoo5 5500???
:)
teffhk 4 years ago
zomfg zomfg HIDEH TEH MEH!!!44 :]
Ireg88 4 years ago
GERIII! Megaman zero is coming to hunt you down and stealz0rz ur rage fury!!!
TehFaceMan 4 years ago
sorry for the bad quality
Ireg88 4 years ago