I suspect the Twixtor engine has a bit more intelligence, vectorization of shapes, tracking & blending..an auto morph if you will, and the tools to refine problem areas (which I have not deployed yet). This results in sharper results when shot with a fast shutter speed, and with the ideal shooting conditions spectacular super slow mo is achieved (on blue sky for example). I've done some frame blended experiments too with good results but the Twixtor engine more interesting, I hope to learn more.
@SheaDesign Sounds good. I find AE to be great when you already have slow motion video. I got my shots from 240 fps to over 1000 nicely but it's really just an on/off thing, there are no options for it, so I can see how Twixtor could come in handy.
Do you know if this is any better or different than using normal time stretching with frame blending in After Effects? I'm seeing the same artifacts by the looks of it.
I suspect the Twixtor engine has a bit more intelligence, vectorization of shapes, tracking & blending..an auto morph if you will, and the tools to refine problem areas (which I have not deployed yet). This results in sharper results when shot with a fast shutter speed, and with the ideal shooting conditions spectacular super slow mo is achieved (on blue sky for example). I've done some frame blended experiments too with good results but the Twixtor engine more interesting, I hope to learn more.
SheaDesign 1 year ago
@SheaDesign Sounds good. I find AE to be great when you already have slow motion video. I got my shots from 240 fps to over 1000 nicely but it's really just an on/off thing, there are no options for it, so I can see how Twixtor could come in handy.
iSOBigD 1 year ago
Do you know if this is any better or different than using normal time stretching with frame blending in After Effects? I'm seeing the same artifacts by the looks of it.
iSOBigD 1 year ago