@managarm1349 I've had a quick look at the specs and I would go for the D or E...but the 22000 count on the E would be the route I would go. Cheers from a very warm Cape Town! Thanks for watching and posting.
This was a great review. You are very professional, voice is calm and understandable, and I give You a big + for the objectiveness!
Anyhow, it would be nice if You could do a test about true rms. I need a dmm and still wondering whether I should buy an expensive one with true rms measuring or not? I'm a newbie in repairing vintage receivers, and want to know... can we tolerate difference between true rms dmm and regular dmm in these applications? A video test 'bout that? Thanks in advance!
@mjlorton I guess that kind of test could easily drawn attention, and from the scientific point of view, You look very equipped with reference instruments - so we have a good conditions for objective results. I look forward to watch that one, and... in the meanwhile I'll try not to fry anything while relaying on my analog el cheapo Chinese multimeter. :-D
Once again, thank You kindly and greetings from Serbia, Europe!
im currently looking to buy the ut-61 (c,d or e). Do you have any thoughts/suggestions?
greetings from snowy austria :)
managarm1349 1 month ago
@managarm1349 I've had a quick look at the specs and I would go for the D or E...but the 22000 count on the E would be the route I would go. Cheers from a very warm Cape Town! Thanks for watching and posting.
mjlorton 1 month ago
Hi Martin Great review I would really like to see you perform a comparison with the UT71E :)
ollyk22 2 months ago
@ollyk22 Thanks for the comment. Yes...the UT71x variants have been on my radar...I'll see if I can get hold of one.
Cheers,
Martin.
mjlorton 2 months ago
This was a great review. You are very professional, voice is calm and understandable, and I give You a big + for the objectiveness!
Anyhow, it would be nice if You could do a test about true rms. I need a dmm and still wondering whether I should buy an expensive one with true rms measuring or not? I'm a newbie in repairing vintage receivers, and want to know... can we tolerate difference between true rms dmm and regular dmm in these applications? A video test 'bout that? Thanks in advance!
mickosurda 2 months ago
@mickosurda Thanks for your comments they are appreciated!
Very good idea, I have never tested the difference between true RMS and a regular DMM so I will certainly do that.
Cheers,
Martin.
mjlorton 2 months ago
@mjlorton I guess that kind of test could easily drawn attention, and from the scientific point of view, You look very equipped with reference instruments - so we have a good conditions for objective results. I look forward to watch that one, and... in the meanwhile I'll try not to fry anything while relaying on my analog el cheapo Chinese multimeter. :-D
Once again, thank You kindly and greetings from Serbia, Europe!
mickosurda 2 months ago
Just started watching, so maybe you comment on it, but is that a Fluke 28 II I spy on the right hand side? When did you obtain that?
samgab 2 months ago
@samgab edit... Oh, watched a bit more and you do comment on it. Duh, I should have watched the whole thing, THEN commented :)
samgab 2 months ago
@samgab No problem....glad you noticed it...will get around to that review soon. Thanks for watching.
mjlorton 2 months ago
The store inventory looks good :).
Uni-T is not bad, not the best but also not the worst they have decent products in my opinion for the price.
electrodacus 2 months ago
@electrodacus Yes...the store is not looking bad...the loan of the two Flukes helps ;-).
mjlorton 2 months ago
Really interested in your 381 review!
brickboiler 2 months ago