badaboom is a horrible video encoder. Not optimized yet. Sure it's fast but the compression is horrible and the quality isn't good. NO current SLI support
Ripbot264 is so much more talented. Sure it uses CPU but the quality and compression ratio is 10x better than badaboom
BADABOM v2 wish list
2-pass filters for quality
MVK support
AutoCrop...ugly grey borders
Better compression. 2hr mp4 for iphone doesn't need to be 2.5gb...400-500mb is much better
I'm disgusted - RapiHD was designed to be useable on ANY CUDA Hardware... But Adobe have licensed it and CRIPPLED it for anything other than QuadroCX GPUs... So I'm sitting here with 2x SLI GTX "60 Black Editions which are next to useless in Premiere thanks to corporate greed. Surely both companies would make more money if they just opened up the plugin for use on all CUDA hardware!?
DONT READ THIS Cause It Really Works. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY Cuz IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS reaLLY WORKS
a single ati 4870x2 can do 2.4Teraflops i have 2 so that should be 4.8 teraflops 4 280 gtx can do 3.77 teraflops if ati made a software for their card it would highly outperform the cuda
OS X 10.5 snow leopard is coming out next year, and they claim to be adding gpu processing for data. i am interesting since these guys are demo'ing their tech against mac hardware. is this going into 10.6?
yay 4 CUDA, i was tinkering around with this tech a while ago, but had to leave it while NV got thier act together and released the drivers for Vista 64-bit.
I think this stuff is the future, and GPGPU is pretty much the way to go. Parallel computation of large datasets on the GPU (eg: a single video frame) iz da shizz.
In the future, i hope "multicore" will become a multi-GPU core with a main CPU controller dishing out work in parallel.
did you play any games with it? when it does come out, will we be flattered with its results? or will it be a mediocre improvement like the current 9 series cards?
I heard they are using a new naming system. The next one was to be 9900 GT or something, it is now called the GTX260 I think. They made it easier so higher numbers actually mean higher performance. Coming out in a couple weeks.
Is there a possibility to post more videos from that Nvidia's press conference? It looks very interesting and it always better to hear it yourself than reading reports.
If not, then that's a pitty, but thanks for that video anyway.
Oooh now am excited!! nvidia and ati makes me sooo excited!Am nearly 40 yrs old and live with me daddy and love being around teenage geeks on forums!teenage geeks and video cards woohooo!! Me daddy thinks am retarded cos i never grew up but i love teenage geeks,video cards and forums.MSN me boys woohooo!
Hardly the case, with folding at home at least ATI's 2900 and 3800s are several times faster at processing information then the PS3 is and about half the price. I imagine the same would apply for encoding video as well.
GTX 280 can do way more than cell in terms of flops. But it requires much more threads as a single GTX 280 has like 240 thread capability while a single cell on the ps3 has like 7.
The Cell is either a gimped, in-order multicore CPU or a gimped, parallel coprocessor, 8 in-order cores (7 functional, one reserved by the PS3 OS, so 6) compared to either 4 highly versatile CPU cores or 16 shader clusters for a total of 128 shader ALUs in the old G80 GPU design. A graphics chip with a unified shader architecture can process hundreds of threads concurrently to mask bandwidth latency. The Cell can do, what, 16, 18 threads? The Cell is somewhere between the CPU and the GPU.
what about converting xvid to dvd or 720p mkv to DVD?
digitalmonkeynuts 11 months ago
is there an ati version of this?
MJBDC07 1 year ago
badaboom is a horrible video encoder. Not optimized yet. Sure it's fast but the compression is horrible and the quality isn't good. NO current SLI support
Ripbot264 is so much more talented. Sure it uses CPU but the quality and compression ratio is 10x better than badaboom
BADABOM v2 wish list
2-pass filters for quality
MVK support
AutoCrop...ugly grey borders
Better compression. 2hr mp4 for iphone doesn't need to be 2.5gb...400-500mb is much better
I know nvidia will never make this happen
eternalkp 2 years ago 2
ya but for the speed the quality is not bad at all. im sure it will only improve...I hope.
hotty198 2 years ago
I'm disgusted - RapiHD was designed to be useable on ANY CUDA Hardware... But Adobe have licensed it and CRIPPLED it for anything other than QuadroCX GPUs... So I'm sitting here with 2x SLI GTX "60 Black Editions which are next to useless in Premiere thanks to corporate greed. Surely both companies would make more money if they just opened up the plugin for use on all CUDA hardware!?
Vortex42 2 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
DONT READ THIS Cause It Really Works. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY Cuz IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS reaLLY WORKS
drumdude360 3 years ago
WTF? Damn that is fast.
shaybshay 3 years ago
a single ati 4870x2 can do 2.4Teraflops i have 2 so that should be 4.8 teraflops 4 280 gtx can do 3.77 teraflops if ati made a software for their card it would highly outperform the cuda
AntDX316 3 years ago
How about Avivo?
And for generic applications, Stream Computing from AMD?
agungk 3 years ago
@agungk Not sure
AntDX316 2 years ago
make this for Linux please
CMatomic 3 years ago
Already exists. Cuda runs on linux with Nvidia. But you will not get this exact interface.
hoplahey 3 years ago 2
Yes, but the actual applications (such as video transcoder like RapiHD above) don't. Cuda only provides a programming interface to the NVidia chips.
agungk 3 years ago
wow, imagine surfing porn on that screen
b00too 3 years ago 2
would be slick
Kovaji 3 years ago
yeh lifesize or giant pussy fap fap fap
GLeNss 3 years ago
I MUST BUY ONE... OR TWO...
itaics 3 years ago
i'd like to encode with cuda, but right now i encode at 150fps, and thats what he said the cuda app encoded at : /
DarkDevil5AO 3 years ago
Are you encoding HD or SD? :O
ElementalTJ 3 years ago 2
What is that program called?
denrocks2 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nice video
no-go.1talk. net
(No Space)
tobiishere 3 years ago
OS X 10.5 snow leopard is coming out next year, and they claim to be adding gpu processing for data. i am interesting since these guys are demo'ing their tech against mac hardware. is this going into 10.6?
fuziwuzi 3 years ago
So basically is this guy talking about the new g200 video cards?
mikekazik1 3 years ago
yeap
dinos22 3 years ago
So how about it? Will this card be able to play crysis at max settings (with just one)? Those aren't really official specs.
mikekazik1 3 years ago 2
Depends on the resolution and your processor, the gtx280 seems to be extremely CPU limited.
stumbo2w 3 years ago
yay 4 CUDA, i was tinkering around with this tech a while ago, but had to leave it while NV got thier act together and released the drivers for Vista 64-bit.
I think this stuff is the future, and GPGPU is pretty much the way to go. Parallel computation of large datasets on the GPU (eg: a single video frame) iz da shizz.
In the future, i hope "multicore" will become a multi-GPU core with a main CPU controller dishing out work in parallel.
More control for the developer. :)
BinaryReader 3 years ago
Is this going to make cg renders go faster?
or does it need some kind of plugin?
o/
Yoh336 3 years ago
There are much faster programs than Itunes, even ones which are entirely CPU bound
4Cunt 3 years ago
What card will come "after" 9800Gx2? 10000Gt or what?
cryozo 3 years ago
Rumored to be called GTX 200.
IKnowsWrestling 3 years ago
it will be announced mid june
i have one of these cards but i'm not allowed to post results just yet
dinos22 3 years ago
Ok.
cryozo 3 years ago
did you play any games with it? when it does come out, will we be flattered with its results? or will it be a mediocre improvement like the current 9 series cards?
mikekazik1 3 years ago
I heard they are using a new naming system. The next one was to be 9900 GT or something, it is now called the GTX260 I think. They made it easier so higher numbers actually mean higher performance. Coming out in a couple weeks.
Kaousama 3 years ago
Honestly, that might make me buy it over a 4870 card...
zedmantheman 3 years ago
Nvidia. Release DirectShow filters pls.
vicj0r 3 years ago
SWEET
yamaha1313 3 years ago
Are you Dinos22 from XS?
johnaiton 3 years ago
yeah that's me
dinos22 3 years ago
Is there a possibility to post more videos from that Nvidia's press conference? It looks very interesting and it always better to hear it yourself than reading reports.
If not, then that's a pitty, but thanks for that video anyway.
Ptosio 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Oooh now am excited!! nvidia and ati makes me sooo excited!Am nearly 40 yrs old and live with me daddy and love being around teenage geeks on forums!teenage geeks and video cards woohooo!! Me daddy thinks am retarded cos i never grew up but i love teenage geeks,video cards and forums.MSN me boys woohooo!
LoadsaMoneys 3 years ago
i dont see teenegers in this video by the way
khlymore 3 years ago
guys this is not just latest gen
ANY G80 and later card has CUDA capability which is necessary for this software to work to use GPUs to encode
so if you buy ANY 8xxx series and later cards you are set even low end ones like 8400/8500/8600 series :)
dinos22 3 years ago
clap, clap well done nvidia...
GTX 280 is blowing my mind!
MrHydez 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
take a ps3 and use it as a computer hack it its way powerfull than anything yet
khlymore 3 years ago
Hardly the case, with folding at home at least ATI's 2900 and 3800s are several times faster at processing information then the PS3 is and about half the price. I imagine the same would apply for encoding video as well.
kamikazecow2000 3 years ago 3
are you sure but already was proben that 8 ps3 together perform as a super computer
khlymore 3 years ago
The person who used PS3s to simulate black holes and gravity and what not, used 16 PS3s. Random info.
TronicSpeedsta 3 years ago
16 ok sorry my bad
khlymore 3 years ago
this is like 400 bucks
16 ps3 is quite a bit more
dabocx56 3 years ago 2
GTX 280 can do way more than cell in terms of flops. But it requires much more threads as a single GTX 280 has like 240 thread capability while a single cell on the ps3 has like 7.
Astacoidea 3 years ago 2
in short
280gtx > ps3
u could get three of those and itll still be cheaper than 16 ps3s
dabocx56 3 years ago
The Cell is either a gimped, in-order multicore CPU or a gimped, parallel coprocessor, 8 in-order cores (7 functional, one reserved by the PS3 OS, so 6) compared to either 4 highly versatile CPU cores or 16 shader clusters for a total of 128 shader ALUs in the old G80 GPU design. A graphics chip with a unified shader architecture can process hundreds of threads concurrently to mask bandwidth latency. The Cell can do, what, 16, 18 threads? The Cell is somewhere between the CPU and the GPU.
joffeloff 3 years ago
Thanks for sharing :)
Fixxxer 3 years ago 2
Got to love those guys down at Nvidia, Thanks for showing this
kylel6 3 years ago 3
Thanks for sharing mate :) Quiet interesting.
necr0n66 3 years ago 2