Added: 2 years ago
From: Professoranton
Views: 1,471
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • proost not proust, course!

  • I love when Anton gets riled up and emotional :)

  • Why contrast cultural evolution with 'natural' evolution as opposed to 'genetic' evolution?

  • i like that you acknowledge the difference between natural ability and learned ability. Yes some humans are born with a greater natural ease of use of their brain, legs, arms etc. athletes are born with something different. This also does nto mean that people cannot learn or train their body to be better, brain included, just as easily as a person can become less skilled with their body by either not using their mind correctly or by getting too fat to run. Refreshing views

  • you are so much nuanced than stefbot will ever be. you are actually educating people.

  • Well, said Professor. Actually, if you don't mind me saying... you are a wonderful example of this...

    From humble beginnings to a world-wide known academic blogger...

    6:14 ... very important...

    I know a pentaglot who is adamant that one only requires around 250 words of a language to be on the road to true fluency...

    Hmm... I fear the computer age and its instant intellectual gratification has so many negative ramifications for the intelligent learner and knowledge retention...

  • brilliant

  • Professoranton is a freaking genius, seriously. He is a really smart guy.

  • I read. But I must also say, a lot of great thoughts are lost due to translation and 'dumbing down' of texts to fit our 'modern day.' It's a pity to know that maybe what I am reading is not really what I think I am reading. Rather, what I am reading is a very dumb down version of what I want to be reading.

  • im a Mr. Cropperite so id never thought i see the day with i agree with professor anton.lol

  • I think cultural evolution outpaced natural(that is, biological, I assume) evolution many millenia ago. How much have our species changed biologically, compared with how much our cultures changed, within at least the last 10,000 years since the Neolithic Revolution?

  • Please go read the Handbook of Epictetus. Have an email? I'll send you a piece of inspiration for reading.

  • Biological evolution apparently operated entirely sans Future (desire, aim, intent) until around the beginning of agriculture (or perhaps the "birth" of culture).

    (Human) cultural evolution is strongly influenced, at the "cellular" level, by Future(s) instinctively generated within each human, and thus, at the "organ", "organism" and "ecology" levels as well.

    Cultural evolution adds a pull from within to the push from without.

    Whole different ballgame.

    Interesting video.

    p

  • I agree with you, prof. Whatever genetic element exists in regards to intelligence, assuming there is indeed one, is being quickly outstripped by the sheer amount of available information.

    Simple memory-stretching exercises can go a looong way towards increasing ability to retain valuable bits, and every bit retained can lead to increased understanding and possibility for new revalation.

  • Great video. I'd like to point out that the library isn't the only place to immerse yourself in the classics and modern and ancient literature on all kinds of topics.

    Websites like Project Gutenberg are allowing technology to link in with the cultivation of the mind by making available an enormous amount of texts free to the public online.

    No location problems, just a net connection and intellectual curiosity!

  • good!

  • The value of a phonetic alphabet for translation between widely different (spoken) languages seems powerful enough to qualify as the "mother" of this invention (and of its proliferation in the meme-sphere). Thanks for the insight.

    Post-infancy cultivation of intellect requires plowing under a whole field of wild vegetation, some of which provides present nourishment, followed by seeding, weeding and waiting. Mirrors, in a way, the move from gathering to planting.

    Good video.

    p

  • Re: Intelligence

    I too get upset at people's ideas of 'intelligence' and 'genius'. It seems self-serving, sometimes with a whiff of eugenics. Its like an excuse for non achievement. 'Einstein was able to figure out all that because he was a genius' as if he was, biologically or otherwise, some sort of exception you need not try to match.

    Its one of the reasons why I can't really take a compliment. I feel like they're trying to put something on me or use me as an excuse for their own mentality.

  • Good post-[insert stuff here plz] philosophy.

  • thanks for this vid. Im reading your recommended Buber. countless corners are now bent, hope the library doesnt mind =)

  • Thank you so much for that comment. Inspiring!

  • Therein lies the value of science. It represents

    the hard won information that can be verified by

    doing the experiments. The rest of human knowledge consists of things that are opinion

    which cannot be tested. Thousands of years

    worth of the stuff, and most of it twisted in transmission by every person who reads it.

    By understanding what Rod Brooks experiment means you can move your concept

    of yourself to a new level. This is the coming

    of age of humans Good video.

  • Thanks. Brooks is interesting. Some interesting stuff also by Donald Arthur Norman.

  • can we plz start a thread on merleau-ponty?

  • This was the best video I've seen you do. It's a 'call to arms' of literacy!

    The cultural evolution theory just gripped me. It makes perfect sense!

  • Thanks

  • Great video!

  • Thanks

  • a coincidence, today I was doing some minor research on Bill Gass and I spent some time on a blog where I came across this:

    "After a panel that he chaired, Corey Anton, the editor of the journal Explorations in Media Ecology, suggested in an offhand though I think very insightful remark that, however else one conducts ones investigations, being well read remains at the core of the methodology of media ecology" (Jerry Harp)

    yes, true, and as for Gass, well, he says:

    (cont.)

  • "My high school had no library worthy of a name 'book,' so I would walk about a mile downtown to a public one to borrow, in almost every case, a new world. That's what a library does for its patrons. It extends the self. It is pure empowerment"

    yep,

    true

  • Gass, in is wonderful chapter On Talking to Oneself" also published as The Unspeakable State of Soliloquy, asks us: "Could we quarrel very well in inkblots?"

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more