it's the matrix... and instead of machines, the dinosaurs are the one's running shit. Bow down to the mighty t-rex! hear him/her "ROOOOOOAAAAARRRRRR!!!!"
Maybe man started evolving naturally and eventually became neanderthal then God saw us and manipulated our dna to mirror their own. We have 46 pairs of chromozones all other primates have 48. What if there is no missing link, what if science and religion are the same, what if we were modified by other intelligence to kick start us into what we are today? Might it fill the gaps in both science and religion, explain antikythera, pyramids, cuneiform writings, old testament, etc. Seems more logical.
@silentgi771 I like the way you're thinking but evolution predicted the missing chromosome would be fused with another, which has since been found, so yes, we still share 98% of our DNA with the great apes, chimpanzee, orangutan, bonobo and gorilla. See the vid "how to shut up pesky creationists".
I agree with doctaword nicely put man. And gamutman, finaly I knew that I couldn't be the only one sick of hearing "life can only exist EXACTLY like it is hear on earth" thank you. "as we know it" doesn't mean only way possible in my opinion.
It seems to me just as likely that the reason Earthlife utilizes lefty acids is because of the abundance from space. suggesting they were brought in from space because life needs them is not established.
This theory faces the same anthropic principal problems as the genesis proponents who apply it face. Life arose using what was availble. This does not mean that what was required for life was supplied. Had right handed amino acids predominated, life may have evolved to utilize those instead.
We haven't discovered other lifeforms yet other than the ones on our planet, but that doesn't eliminate the possibility of life on other planets and certainly doesn't allow us Earthlings to claim that we are the origin of life.
Not really, even though there is a huge "luck" factor involved, there is still a high chance that a lot of the basic designs found on earth, would also be found in Space.
well, not necessarily.. if the basis for that life would be something other than aminoacids and DNA, then it might be completely different.. but this of course doesn't correspond with the panspermic theory.
given that the universe is homogeneous there's high chance there are millions of moderately warm planets with lots of water (similar to earth) that could work as a soil for those organic particles. gravitational forces and the length of day could differ, thus resulting in alternate life forms.
Well I do believe that as earth was formed , it had already produced "some" essential elements. Intersteller elements that were brought down to earth via meteorites or asteroids, integrated with earth's element to produce new element and evolved over time.
You can keep kissing the ass of your priest and offering yours to him...go to your church and set it on fire please. But DO NOT make more FANATIC comments that shows the shit you are involved in, and Show RESPECT to the people who give their lives to describe the process in the COSMOS. You perverted , misogynist & retarded PEDERASTS: YOUR GAME IS OVER!!!!!
its no good you know creashion god freaks don't listen to any one but there imaginary friends in the sky, no matter how logical the argument they have there heads way to far up there ass, the stupid assholes.
gotribe78 STFU you have no idea about wat ur talking about its a THEORY not "lets get god out of the picture and piss off all the religious freaks"... dipshit
this is a theory thats going through the scientific process. it says what it thinks, it supports with facts, it gains followers and skeptics both working to disprove it, probably coming to the same conclusion tho. or else it wouldnt have made it on tv haha pbs rules. i didnt hear them say 'god(s)' this is unbiased information with real science. where as ur belief really has no proof. society is a line outside for a club(enlightenment), religion is the big dumb bouncer holding everyone back
Yah that atheist is thinking why not just belief in bible and be happy dont think look at gotribe his not thinking just strike question and use god us force shield and everything would be answer or whatever the answer of the thinking science we hi-jack it and say its all because of god its jsut easy so follow gotribe gogogo
You are the only one i see bringing about the idea of getting god out of the picture. If the deity of your belief structure exists why do you assume this deity could not have caused what they are investigating. I'm not asking that you question your beliefs, I'm just asking that you open your eyes and your mind, don't forget your belief structure, just allow it to adapt with new information. You can cling to doctrine and follow word for word, negate the outside world
shut up, give me proof about your "god" thats real proof, like pictures and shit that he exists, otherwise we will remain atheists, the only people left that have common sence instead of these brainwashed christians
He funny one. Just watch a few videos right here on youtube. Do a little research. Maybe do a search for "dinosaurs alive today" and the like.. Cheers... and I wish you well in your search for God....
Plesiosaurs weren't dinosaurs. But I think your point is that a group of these ancient animals till survives to the present day. This, though, is dubious. While it's possible that a group of these creatures has survived at Loch Ness (I would love this to be the case, and I'd be as intrigued and thrilled as anyone), it's not at all likely. There is no solid evidence of them, just vague eye witness claims (as well as some notable hoaxes).
Hello cay. Have you not seen the picture of the flipper of Nessie? Take some time to check it out. There is also Mokele Mbembe which is not a plesiosaur at all. There are ancient Icca Stones which depict different "dinosaurs".... TRex, Treceretops,etc. Also, a 900 year old stone carving on a temple in Tailand. That one is of a stegosaurus and also an iguanadon. There is much evidence that what is taught in the secular schools is amiss. But then we should expect this....
Sorry, the fin photos aren't solid evidence of anything. They are enhanced images of something that may or may not be what it is purported to be. We find no fossil evidence of plesiosaurs after the K/T event. We find no physical evidence of dinosaurs in the Congo. We find no physical remains of dinosaurs in Thailand. No ornaments made from dinosaur bone which could be tested in a lab, no clothing or such made from dinosaur skin, no anything.
We do however find in Thailand a stone carving on a temple wall that is over 900 years old of a stegosaurus and of an iguanadon. Nice legal/historical proof. We have totally different worldviews. I believe that in Noah's flood and that that is when the the billions of things died and were buried in sediment that later solidified. These buried creatures then were fossilized. Thus, the Earth is only about 6000 years old.
Yeah if you look up evidence for Noah's flood you get nothing that makes remotely any sense... Maybe some videos of Kent Hovind rambling on and failing in science.
LOL @thechessstick Consider getting a brain with some kind of problem solving ability. If every molecule of ice on the planet melted (which is highly unlikely) the sea levels would rise a maximum of around 220ft... That's taking thermal expansion into account as well. Now what were you saying?
LOL again @tisaunde. You show your ignorance. The fountains of the deep were broken and the windows of heaven were opened. It had never rained before the rain that caused Noah's flood. The topography was different . It is unknown how call the highest ante-deluvian mountain was. The ocean basins formed and the flood waters ran into them. If the earth were perfectly smooth the oceans would be over 2 miles deep. There is pillow lava atop of Mount Ararat and other mountains.
I'm sorry... But where the hell are you getting these bogus facts from. And NO the topography of the Earth a few thousand years ago was nearly identical to that of today. It takes hundreds of thousands of years for plate tectonics to drastically change the face of the earth. The Earth perfectly smooth? The fountains of heaven were opened? Please tell me where you find this bogus crap at... How do you even know for sure that there is a heaven? Do you know someone who has been there?Use your brain
@tisaunde there are those rare moments in which u do see either heaven or hell that ARE credible (look into the persons eyes when they share thier experience u can tell)
@knightace2002 Just like you can look into the eyes of an extremist when he says that "God told me to kill them" or "God wants me to destroy this building." Being religious is a neurological disorder. If you want to be like that by all means go for it, but do it in your little corner and and don't try to impede the progress of science because the findings contradict your ideology.
@tisaunde ddidn'ty say it did i'm just saying there are ppl who have been there and back agian and have changed thier ways bc of it (seeing hell) there's 1 that ik of who has done just that and is now a minister at a church after a life saying surgery not denying science (God does use it after all to get his points agian hence the 9 "plagues" of Egypt that happend at around the time of said exodus) just saying it should broaden it not deny it
@knightace2002 There is no evidence to support the plagues of Egypt... Egypt was excellent at keeping records and it is completely silent of the plagues.
@tisaunde it wouldn't but the possibility is there bc it can happen it's happend before in many parts of the world but my point being is that it wouldn't be recorded many things aren't recorded that humanity doesn't truely know about hence the "hobbit in indonesia and the written records of Atlanios (Atlantis) even tho they're in plain sight
I think we could survive a major impact, life is pretty frikken resilient. Maybe a lot of people would die, but enough would live by some unpredictable lucky coincidence.
More importantly those grapes looked damn good! I want some! Grapes at my grocery store don't compare to those tasty beauties they make wine from.
At least the Atheist asks questions, the creationist simply makes statements. They have no evidence. The bible is not evidence of itself. Written by men for men.
Most people that claim to have read the bible merely cherry pick from it. They don't research it's stories like how Nimrod was the first Mason and was the original trinity and solar deity.
Why bother asking questions, it's preordained. It's God's will, it's in the bible. Let's just do nothing and wait for the end of the world.
life on earth from outer space is one idea, but it still dont answer the question, what is the origin of all life and the universe itself. I dont think we'll answer this question anytime soon...
this is what all these are saying. not very groundbreaking even a little kid could think of this.
I think they were saying the life on earth was ignited fron space metriorites with left sided animo acids......proving that life does exist else where in the cosmo beofre earth......there are beings there !!!
stop using words like "proof" and "evidence" and such. Nothing about the great question of life will ever be PROVEN. ever! I stress the word PROVEN! We will always beleive more or less in one or other theory.
Humanity as long as it has existed, has atributed god/s with creating things that they don't understand about. When we didn't know about rain we said god did it. when we didn't know about viruses and illness we said god did it. This, people,is called a god of gaps. The god of gaps in human knowledge.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Astoundingly enough, even brilliant minds such as Newton added "God" to fill their gaps of knowledge though the "God" these scientists speak of is quite different from the theistic God.
@morgoth007 hell yea man, they thought the wind/hail/thunder everything, they thought it was gods, they thought rocks that had magnetic attributes had gods in them. people just dont understand man.
it doesn't matter if it was 200 billion light years away what's important is how did DNA formed by it self? and what about those protein nano machines?
the scince has proven that everytning has been made of same thing which is electrons which are in every empty space and also if these electrons are the base for every matter means it also has the intelligence to be anything to form anything here is the need for your attention what is empty space?
and how much electron is there? and how much inteligence is around us ? look with no ego.
if a tiny bits of prticle which as you say came from out of space could creat such harmonus and complex and variety of life forms on earth, dont you think that now the univerce should be full of diffrent life forms? what is the origin of life is so near to you and yet with all your education havent got the insight to see origin of life in front of you.
i will never dispute the claim that life was created. i very well could be. i, however, will laugh whole heartedly in the face of a christian quoting the bible. or any other religion for that matter.
Its a better story than the spontaneous-life-from-clay theory. I'd rather be the descendant of a space traveller than a mud wriggler. Good to see some imagination coming back to science
Love the series. Reinforces my contentions that there's no need for anyone to jump specifically on the abiogenesis bandwagon per se. All it takes is for some Deinococcus to hitch a ride on a rock, and then land in an accommodating environment.
nope, to form life(to form proteins), the aminoacids need to combine in a specific way, if they dont combine in the right way, life cant be created(this means left handed unions)
However, i believe that the evidence in this documentary proves that the evolution of life was *influenced* more than it was *caused* by events such as meteor strikes.
There is a much more complicated system of macromolecules that would be required to make a cell capable of reproducing itself. Amini acids are just a tiny fraction of the long list of organic compounds needed. ONLY a higher creator could put this together in EXACTLY the perfect structure/timing to originate life.
I remember in school learning that most of the time you here see the words ONLY or ALWAYS, the statements being made are usually false. I think this works here beautifully.
You sound as if your mind is made(and good for you )so much so that you can't possibly evaluate future information. So closed to any possibility that the truth may be different than what you perceive it to be. (just my impression) I also feel you may be turning off an otherwise receptive audience. I don't know for certainty the origins of life, but then again, I don't pretend to either. Just a little constructive criticism.
My thoughts (regardless if I am closed-minded or not)stand without consideration for my personal credibility. They are still showing three comments above this one, in case you are up to debunking them. However, fully understanding it all may require intensive study of chemistry and biology, as does deeply understanding this video series.
I will stay on topic if you make an attempt to refute my point of view. Otherwise, I have to assume that if the best response you can come up with is an attack on the messenger, then you agree with the message.
It's your point of view. I respect it. My lack of certainty was already admitted above. You may assume as you wish. You couldn't possibly be wrong. Oh, and thank you Gravitationalist, I have enjoyed many of your vids and have many hours to go.
Everything we dont understand "god did it" great argument there. I suppose we should close the book on the origins of life then, because pursuing an explanation that doesnt neccisarily require a god must be blasphemous.
I understand that chaos can form simple and complex patterns, that must make me a heratic.
its not understood so god did it.. now close the book and stop researching... right? Searching for an explanation and being open to it not including a god must be heresy.
I understand that thre is a probability that chaos can form simple and complex patterns, I must be a heretic.
it's the matrix... and instead of machines, the dinosaurs are the one's running shit. Bow down to the mighty t-rex! hear him/her "ROOOOOOAAAAARRRRRR!!!!"
MisterAaronRodriguez 2 months ago
Justin Bieber created life.
PurelyUnintentional 2 months ago
Maybe man started evolving naturally and eventually became neanderthal then God saw us and manipulated our dna to mirror their own. We have 46 pairs of chromozones all other primates have 48. What if there is no missing link, what if science and religion are the same, what if we were modified by other intelligence to kick start us into what we are today? Might it fill the gaps in both science and religion, explain antikythera, pyramids, cuneiform writings, old testament, etc. Seems more logical.
silentgi771 3 months ago
@silentgi771 I like the way you're thinking but evolution predicted the missing chromosome would be fused with another, which has since been found, so yes, we still share 98% of our DNA with the great apes, chimpanzee, orangutan, bonobo and gorilla. See the vid "how to shut up pesky creationists".
bigglyguy 4 days ago
228 people haven't evolved opposable thumbs yet
noisyneil 5 months ago
Why so many dislikes this is a fun video.
osmosys808 5 months ago
I see 225 idiots missed the thumbs up button....
Drweavil 1 year ago
i need more of this stuff....
ilikeyouallot 1 year ago
@ilikeyouallot me too man
Chrisaaad 1 year ago
Just goes to show how many biblical fanatics are out there.
People are so used to believing that a magical man in the sky created us all. LOL
SturmWolfe 1 year ago
Really, about all on can say is "LOL LOL LOL LOL." .... etc, etc, etc....
thechessstick 1 year ago
So if my understanding is correct a meteor with L-AAs hit earth and that's were all their abundance came from.
What about the moon and the earth, they had a collision and then formed then what if the proto moon was the carrier?
Where were they originally syntheisized?
okeeffdp 2 years ago
LOL LOL
thechessstick 1 year ago
@thechessstick just knew you,d be american. i can here you now,,," god did it all, evolution sucks,,,bla-bla." crazy.
userwl2850 1 year ago
i don't know why this video has such a bad rating, its a completely legitimate theory that we should be exploring...
CanadaRox7861 2 years ago 4
When believers found something that contradicts parts or everything they believe, they do this.
That's the reason of the bad rating.
guifercon 2 years ago
TRUE
vicx05 2 years ago
I agree with doctaword nicely put man. And gamutman, finaly I knew that I couldn't be the only one sick of hearing "life can only exist EXACTLY like it is hear on earth" thank you. "as we know it" doesn't mean only way possible in my opinion.
nazsh11 2 years ago
It seems to me just as likely that the reason Earthlife utilizes lefty acids is because of the abundance from space. suggesting they were brought in from space because life needs them is not established.
This theory faces the same anthropic principal problems as the genesis proponents who apply it face. Life arose using what was availble. This does not mean that what was required for life was supplied. Had right handed amino acids predominated, life may have evolved to utilize those instead.
gamutman 2 years ago
LOL LOL LOL LOL. You have got to be kidding me. Repent and turn to God before it is too late!!
thechessstick 2 years ago
No-one cares about the God argument, take it to Godtube you ignorant Christers
bdonmc 2 years ago 6
funny xD
CossacksChampion 2 years ago
This isn't origin of life, it's origin of life on Earth
doctaword 2 years ago 3
so far no other planet was found with life on it so origins of life is a correct title
tecna64 2 years ago
We haven't discovered other lifeforms yet other than the ones on our planet, but that doesn't eliminate the possibility of life on other planets and certainly doesn't allow us Earthlings to claim that we are the origin of life.
doctaword 2 years ago
kwl this means there could be some creatures in other plantes that are similar to humans =P
som3dud 2 years ago
well evolution would surely have gone very differently on other planets
marowak1337 2 years ago
Not really, even though there is a huge "luck" factor involved, there is still a high chance that a lot of the basic designs found on earth, would also be found in Space.
poupeechiffon 2 years ago
well, not necessarily.. if the basis for that life would be something other than aminoacids and DNA, then it might be completely different.. but this of course doesn't correspond with the panspermic theory.
marowak1337 2 years ago
given that the universe is homogeneous there's high chance there are millions of moderately warm planets with lots of water (similar to earth) that could work as a soil for those organic particles. gravitational forces and the length of day could differ, thus resulting in alternate life forms.
aimalfunction 2 years ago
Well I do believe that as earth was formed , it had already produced "some" essential elements. Intersteller elements that were brought down to earth via meteorites or asteroids, integrated with earth's element to produce new element and evolved over time.
mickeyjgo 3 years ago
You can keep kissing the ass of your priest and offering yours to him...go to your church and set it on fire please. But DO NOT make more FANATIC comments that shows the shit you are involved in, and Show RESPECT to the people who give their lives to describe the process in the COSMOS. You perverted , misogynist & retarded PEDERASTS: YOUR GAME IS OVER!!!!!
dancingwithoutwords 3 years ago 6
its no good you know creashion god freaks don't listen to any one but there imaginary friends in the sky, no matter how logical the argument they have there heads way to far up there ass, the stupid assholes.
octobubble 2 years ago 4
why do u need a god for life, we are the magic.
daniel246 3 years ago 9
gotribe78 STFU you have no idea about wat ur talking about its a THEORY not "lets get god out of the picture and piss off all the religious freaks"... dipshit
KAOSKINGS07 3 years ago
Comets definitively play a role in our development
sinxcosxtanx 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is just another way to get God out of the picture.
These atheists want to make humans into another number rather than what he really is: Imago Deo!
gotribe78 3 years ago
this is a theory thats going through the scientific process. it says what it thinks, it supports with facts, it gains followers and skeptics both working to disprove it, probably coming to the same conclusion tho. or else it wouldnt have made it on tv haha pbs rules. i didnt hear them say 'god(s)' this is unbiased information with real science. where as ur belief really has no proof. society is a line outside for a club(enlightenment), religion is the big dumb bouncer holding everyone back
broomball98 3 years ago
GOT tribe ( alcohol consumer )if you dont like it go study a bible. These are the people that can move all faward in gods world.
austpom333 3 years ago
Yah that atheist is thinking why not just belief in bible and be happy dont think look at gotribe his not thinking just strike question and use god us force shield and everything would be answer or whatever the answer of the thinking science we hi-jack it and say its all because of god its jsut easy so follow gotribe gogogo
earthangelrojanie 3 years ago
You are the only one i see bringing about the idea of getting god out of the picture. If the deity of your belief structure exists why do you assume this deity could not have caused what they are investigating. I'm not asking that you question your beliefs, I'm just asking that you open your eyes and your mind, don't forget your belief structure, just allow it to adapt with new information. You can cling to doctrine and follow word for word, negate the outside world
i just dont recommend it
Hippiesandmohawks 3 years ago
shut up, give me proof about your "god" thats real proof, like pictures and shit that he exists, otherwise we will remain atheists, the only people left that have common sence instead of these brainwashed christians
tecna64 2 years ago
He funny one. Just watch a few videos right here on youtube. Do a little research. Maybe do a search for "dinosaurs alive today" and the like.. Cheers... and I wish you well in your search for God....
thechessstick 2 years ago
"dinosaurs alive today"
They're called birds.
cayetanoluis 2 years ago
Oh no. They are called by several names. Nessie is one of them. Champ is another. You should do some research.
thechessstick 2 years ago
Plesiosaurs weren't dinosaurs. But I think your point is that a group of these ancient animals till survives to the present day. This, though, is dubious. While it's possible that a group of these creatures has survived at Loch Ness (I would love this to be the case, and I'd be as intrigued and thrilled as anyone), it's not at all likely. There is no solid evidence of them, just vague eye witness claims (as well as some notable hoaxes).
cayetanoluis 2 years ago
Hello cay. Have you not seen the picture of the flipper of Nessie? Take some time to check it out. There is also Mokele Mbembe which is not a plesiosaur at all. There are ancient Icca Stones which depict different "dinosaurs".... TRex, Treceretops,etc. Also, a 900 year old stone carving on a temple in Tailand. That one is of a stegosaurus and also an iguanadon. There is much evidence that what is taught in the secular schools is amiss. But then we should expect this....
thechessstick 2 years ago
Sorry, the fin photos aren't solid evidence of anything. They are enhanced images of something that may or may not be what it is purported to be. We find no fossil evidence of plesiosaurs after the K/T event. We find no physical evidence of dinosaurs in the Congo. We find no physical remains of dinosaurs in Thailand. No ornaments made from dinosaur bone which could be tested in a lab, no clothing or such made from dinosaur skin, no anything.
cayetanoluis 2 years ago
We do however find in Thailand a stone carving on a temple wall that is over 900 years old of a stegosaurus and of an iguanadon. Nice legal/historical proof. We have totally different worldviews. I believe that in Noah's flood and that that is when the the billions of things died and were buried in sediment that later solidified. These buried creatures then were fossilized. Thus, the Earth is only about 6000 years old.
thechessstick 2 years ago
"the Earth is only about 6000 years old"
Yeah, 6000 years old (younger than the domestication of the dog). RETARD.
cayetanoluis 2 years ago
P.S. Look on youtube for videos "Evidence of Noah's Flood".
thechessstick 2 years ago
Yeah if you look up evidence for Noah's flood you get nothing that makes remotely any sense... Maybe some videos of Kent Hovind rambling on and failing in science.
tisaunde 1 year ago
LOL @ tisande. Do some homework.
thechessstick 1 year ago
LOL @thechessstick Consider getting a brain with some kind of problem solving ability. If every molecule of ice on the planet melted (which is highly unlikely) the sea levels would rise a maximum of around 220ft... That's taking thermal expansion into account as well. Now what were you saying?
tisaunde 1 year ago
LOL again @tisaunde. You show your ignorance. The fountains of the deep were broken and the windows of heaven were opened. It had never rained before the rain that caused Noah's flood. The topography was different . It is unknown how call the highest ante-deluvian mountain was. The ocean basins formed and the flood waters ran into them. If the earth were perfectly smooth the oceans would be over 2 miles deep. There is pillow lava atop of Mount Ararat and other mountains.
thechessstick 1 year ago
I'm sorry... But where the hell are you getting these bogus facts from. And NO the topography of the Earth a few thousand years ago was nearly identical to that of today. It takes hundreds of thousands of years for plate tectonics to drastically change the face of the earth. The Earth perfectly smooth? The fountains of heaven were opened? Please tell me where you find this bogus crap at... How do you even know for sure that there is a heaven? Do you know someone who has been there?Use your brain
tisaunde 1 year ago
Please, do some work.
thechessstick 1 year ago
@tisaunde there are those rare moments in which u do see either heaven or hell that ARE credible (look into the persons eyes when they share thier experience u can tell)
knightace2002 1 year ago
@knightace2002 Just like you can look into the eyes of an extremist when he says that "God told me to kill them" or "God wants me to destroy this building." Being religious is a neurological disorder. If you want to be like that by all means go for it, but do it in your little corner and and don't try to impede the progress of science because the findings contradict your ideology.
tisaunde 1 year ago
@tisaunde ddidn'ty say it did i'm just saying there are ppl who have been there and back agian and have changed thier ways bc of it (seeing hell) there's 1 that ik of who has done just that and is now a minister at a church after a life saying surgery not denying science (God does use it after all to get his points agian hence the 9 "plagues" of Egypt that happend at around the time of said exodus) just saying it should broaden it not deny it
knightace2002 1 year ago
@knightace2002 There is no evidence to support the plagues of Egypt... Egypt was excellent at keeping records and it is completely silent of the plagues.
tisaunde 1 year ago
@tisaunde it wouldn't but the possibility is there bc it can happen it's happend before in many parts of the world but my point being is that it wouldn't be recorded many things aren't recorded that humanity doesn't truely know about hence the "hobbit in indonesia and the written records of Atlanios (Atlantis) even tho they're in plain sight
knightace2002 1 year ago
I think we could survive a major impact, life is pretty frikken resilient. Maybe a lot of people would die, but enough would live by some unpredictable lucky coincidence.
More importantly those grapes looked damn good! I want some! Grapes at my grocery store don't compare to those tasty beauties they make wine from.
psychonautx26s 3 years ago 2
Didn't Oparin make an experiment, in which he created amino acids in his lab, using to this simple chemical compound and electric spark?
suonatar1 3 years ago
This just passing the 'Cosmic Buck' as there has to be a 'First Cause', where did that come from then ? A difficult question for an athiest!
Loonypics 3 years ago
I'm not saying panspermia isn't possible, but life could have started right here as well.
suonatar1 3 years ago
At least the Atheist asks questions, the creationist simply makes statements. They have no evidence. The bible is not evidence of itself. Written by men for men.
Most people that claim to have read the bible merely cherry pick from it. They don't research it's stories like how Nimrod was the first Mason and was the original trinity and solar deity.
Why bother asking questions, it's preordained. It's God's will, it's in the bible. Let's just do nothing and wait for the end of the world.
Slavesrevolt 3 years ago
I 'Slavesrevolt' If you are right and I am wrong it won't matter much, will it.
But if the reverse is true it will matter quite a bit don't you think.
Loonypics 3 years ago
Not to me because "in your mind" I'm already going th "hell"
The masters of make believe have you fooled. You probably like magic tricks and science fiction.
Slavesrevolt 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Listen closely 'Slavesrevolt' If your atheisic belief is true, then anything that happens after we are all dead it won't matter much, will it !
But if you are wrong it will matter quite a bit my friend.
Note : No one is currently in Heaven or Hell at the momment. You have been misinformed by someone with little real knowlege of scripture.
Loonypics 3 years ago
You have your "beliefs" I have my "knowledge.
You believe.
I know.
You make statements
I ask questions.
Slavesrevolt 3 years ago 2
"But if your wrong it will matter quite a bit my friend."
Time to start worshipping all the other gods, just in case you're wrong.
cayetanoluis 2 years ago
Very interesting...hmmm
KN0MADD 4 years ago
indeed...hmmm
fiendin281 4 years ago
life on earth from outer space is one idea, but it still dont answer the question, what is the origin of all life and the universe itself. I dont think we'll answer this question anytime soon...
this is what all these are saying. not very groundbreaking even a little kid could think of this.
Goodluck in finding the answer ;)
shaolindreams 4 years ago
I think they were saying the life on earth was ignited fron space metriorites with left sided animo acids......proving that life does exist else where in the cosmo beofre earth......there are beings there !!!
emptiness2holiness 4 years ago
sweeeeet!
shaolindreams 4 years ago
stop using words like "proof" and "evidence" and such. Nothing about the great question of life will ever be PROVEN. ever! I stress the word PROVEN! We will always beleive more or less in one or other theory.
miks8 4 years ago
interesting stuff, thanks!
malarkeynshin 4 years ago 2
Humanity as long as it has existed, has atributed god/s with creating things that they don't understand about. When we didn't know about rain we said god did it. when we didn't know about viruses and illness we said god did it. This, people,is called a god of gaps. The god of gaps in human knowledge.
morgoth007 4 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Astoundingly enough, even brilliant minds such as Newton added "God" to fill their gaps of knowledge though the "God" these scientists speak of is quite different from the theistic God.
Abdulmelik2007 3 years ago
@morgoth007 hell yea man, they thought the wind/hail/thunder everything, they thought it was gods, they thought rocks that had magnetic attributes had gods in them. people just dont understand man.
kingjosh87 1 year ago
That was a really pathetic theory.
How did DNA form out of nowhere anyway?
it doesn't matter if it was 200 billion light years away what's important is how did DNA formed by it self? and what about those protein nano machines?
nurbsenvi 4 years ago
the scince has proven that everytning has been made of same thing which is electrons which are in every empty space and also if these electrons are the base for every matter means it also has the intelligence to be anything to form anything here is the need for your attention what is empty space?
and how much electron is there? and how much inteligence is around us ? look with no ego.
lastfriendalive 4 years ago
wtf?
fiendin281 4 years ago
the great zoogando belched us forth from the center of the universe
Gubbinz 4 years ago 2
if a tiny bits of prticle which as you say came from out of space could creat such harmonus and complex and variety of life forms on earth, dont you think that now the univerce should be full of diffrent life forms? what is the origin of life is so near to you and yet with all your education havent got the insight to see origin of life in front of you.
lastfriendalive 4 years ago
Its almost identical as we like to watch movies??!!?!! and News on Tv??!?1/
licksuck 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
im sorry i see no science, ONLY speculation. no evidence to back this fairy tale
darklink0112 4 years ago
i will never dispute the claim that life was created. i very well could be. i, however, will laugh whole heartedly in the face of a christian quoting the bible. or any other religion for that matter.
munkytron 4 years ago 5
my culo
MAGONZACO 4 years ago
that was sarcastic, a joke, americans have no sense of humor, ummm retards.
MAGONZACO 4 years ago
umm ive never read a religious book.
maybe its fun for God to watch people speculate,invent theories, love,die,fuck,etc. i dont blame him that must be very interesting.
MAGONZACO 4 years ago
cause back then they didn`t had archaeologists? duh
MAGONZACO 4 years ago
That explained nothing to origin, the problem regarding abiogenesis' impossibility still exists.
Jd311989 4 years ago
What we know is that many organic molecules come from sources in space.
What we don't know is how organized they are when they get here.
JohnDeBunkTest 4 years ago
Its a better story than the spontaneous-life-from-clay theory. I'd rather be the descendant of a space traveller than a mud wriggler. Good to see some imagination coming back to science
mjdoyza 4 years ago 3
Love the series. Reinforces my contentions that there's no need for anyone to jump specifically on the abiogenesis bandwagon per se. All it takes is for some Deinococcus to hitch a ride on a rock, and then land in an accommodating environment.
Thanks for the vids.
vital2mi 4 years ago
okay they lost me with the left handed stuff. why are all living organisms left handed because meteorite crystals are?
munkytron 4 years ago
nope, to form life(to form proteins), the aminoacids need to combine in a specific way, if they dont combine in the right way, life cant be created(this means left handed unions)
MAGONZACO 4 years ago
yeah i researched it a bit is it right that right handed proteins or whatever make poisons
munkytron 4 years ago
This is very compelling i actually like this theory
is makes sense as to how so many different forms of life are so tightly fit on this planet
xxrigo22xx 4 years ago
LOL! Skunksbutt believes in god!
7armynation 4 years ago
Nice vid, Panspermia is a very strong theory.
However, i believe that the evidence in this documentary proves that the evolution of life was *influenced* more than it was *caused* by events such as meteor strikes.
AOCPopo 4 years ago 2
There is a much more complicated system of macromolecules that would be required to make a cell capable of reproducing itself. Amini acids are just a tiny fraction of the long list of organic compounds needed. ONLY a higher creator could put this together in EXACTLY the perfect structure/timing to originate life.
stupidvidiot 4 years ago
I remember in school learning that most of the time you here see the words ONLY or ALWAYS, the statements being made are usually false. I think this works here beautifully.
skunksbutt 4 years ago
This is what is known as a "straw man" argument. You could probably google it.
stupidvidiot 4 years ago
You sound as if your mind is made(and good for you )so much so that you can't possibly evaluate future information. So closed to any possibility that the truth may be different than what you perceive it to be. (just my impression) I also feel you may be turning off an otherwise receptive audience. I don't know for certainty the origins of life, but then again, I don't pretend to either. Just a little constructive criticism.
skunksbutt 4 years ago
My thoughts (regardless if I am closed-minded or not)stand without consideration for my personal credibility. They are still showing three comments above this one, in case you are up to debunking them. However, fully understanding it all may require intensive study of chemistry and biology, as does deeply understanding this video series.
stupidvidiot 4 years ago
changing the topic to straw man and googling it is quite a straw man as well. You could probably google it.
skunksbutt 4 years ago 2
I will stay on topic if you make an attempt to refute my point of view. Otherwise, I have to assume that if the best response you can come up with is an attack on the messenger, then you agree with the message.
stupidvidiot 4 years ago
It's your point of view. I respect it. My lack of certainty was already admitted above. You may assume as you wish. You couldn't possibly be wrong. Oh, and thank you Gravitationalist, I have enjoyed many of your vids and have many hours to go.
skunksbutt 4 years ago
Everything we dont understand "god did it" great argument there. I suppose we should close the book on the origins of life then, because pursuing an explanation that doesnt neccisarily require a god must be blasphemous.
I understand that chaos can form simple and complex patterns, that must make me a heratic.
JebusGeist 4 years ago 4
its not understood so god did it.. now close the book and stop researching... right? Searching for an explanation and being open to it not including a god must be heresy.
I understand that thre is a probability that chaos can form simple and complex patterns, I must be a heretic.
JebusGeist 4 years ago 4
you mean the flying spaghetti monster
overide1234 4 years ago
Very good work! Keep the videos coming!
TRUEADONIS 4 years ago
Great links.
RobnJake 4 years ago