Sorry kiddies, but it’s the hieroglyph of a plucked duck prepared for consumption or sacrifice (with the consonantal transliteration of “snd“ or “snt“), and it means “timid, fear”. And it’s the origins of the Sa’idic Coptic Egyptian word “cnad” or “cnat” (“fear”) -- s=c in Coptic. I used to collect dinosaur toys when I was a boy also. Have fun.
People should understand that everything you're taught at school is not 100% fact, sometimes something gets proven wrong, but if there is no replacement, they leave it there. Diniosaurs being one of those things, there are still some dinosaurs. Ever head of the Mokele-mbembe or the Loch Ness Monster? well, there real and there many witnesses that have seen them. So the question is not, HOW did dinos go extinct? But instead DID they ALL go extint?.
I'm going to keep my mind open to the possibility that this is a depiction of a plesiosaurus. Do this, type plesiosaurus or plesiosaur into any search window, Yahoo, Bing, Google etc and click on images then take another look at this video. Can we say we definitely know that it is not a plesiosaur even though it sure looks like one. The Egyptians were not sloppy with their heiroglyphs and I've never seen a duck with four feet. If you don't agree based on what you see, that's cool.
Scorpions look like silverfish, but depictions are rare, because this animal was feared; search for Serqet(Selkis), her name is written: door bolt(S)-mouth(R)-hill(Q)-loaf of bread(T). "Your" hieroglyph is a part of a blessing for a dead person( Egyptians had hoped, that afterlife would be exactly like this one, only without suffering), and means: (may you catch) a plenty of aquatic fowl, when you hunt in the reeds, sort of "have fun".
totally. yep. thats a dinosaur if i ever saw one. but seriously, it looks more like a fishing hook to me. i wonder what the translation of the writing says.
it s a scorpio !!! dumb ! look at the astrology books ! there is the same draw ! and even though there were dinosaurs , what s the importance ?... The last dinosaurs were reptiles like pteranodon ( so see babylonian and sumer civilisations) and birds ! no t-rex or something else
Ok so where is the chase and how do I cut to it? Seriously though, this could quite easily be a fishing hook, a trussed bird or possibly the hieroglyph for the consonants kp.
the egyptians worshipped baboons. second, thats a goat, and OMG, it wouldve helped if you knew anything about egypt before visiting the british museum. that last glyph is a BARBED fishing hook they used (and it stands for the syllable 'mii'. the think body is because of the way it was made, kind of as a weight. we have the actual examples
I think it looks more like an elasmosaurus than a trussed goose. If they had to truss the wings, why didn't they truss the neck? I think you people who want it to be a trussed goose are denying what is in plain sight. South American peoples carved Spinosaurus, Triceritops and other dinosaurs on stones, yet somehow these are fakes when all the others are authentic, even if the oxidation study shows the dinosaur carvings to be hundreds of years old. You evolutionists are just in denial.
It's a fishing lure, duh! Did you know they fished? And we got the fishing lure from them. Actually I'm joking but it does resemble a lure and if I acted serious enough people would probably believe it. But who knows maybe it's the Loch Ness monster?
Why does everyone have to make a mountain out of a mole hill? I mean seriously? It's a carving made thousands of years ago, unless you have a time machine and can go back and ask the egyptians if they owned dinosaurs im pretty dam sure it's just them making symbols. To be honest that thing above it looks like a worm with a bow on it. I guess they had GIANT worms that they trained too huh? Come on...
@megamixa There is MUCH physical evidence that dinosaurs and man were contemporaneous. ONe of many videos is do a you tube search of Dennis Swift and watch all 3 of his videos 1 - 3 of 3 videos called "Caught In the Act" with Dr Carl Baugh
He shows a couple of totem poles with dinosaurs and man attacking each other. There are many others also. If you truly want to seek the truth, the information is out there and easy to find.
There is much physical evidence that "dinosaurs" walk this earth today. Just because you say Dinosaur doesn't mean it's a prehistoric reptile running around smashing people. Squirrels are dinosaurs by definition but you don't see me on CNN holding one up saying I found the missing link do you? Evolution changes animals over time, what was once a giant bird is now a falcon and so on... Thats my point.
I found this symbol in Gardiner's "Egyptian Grammar", 3rd edition, symbol G54 under "birds". It's identified as a "trussed goose or duck". For example, it's used as the determinant in a word meaning "to wring the neck of birds".
There's a certain amount of variation in hieroglyphs, but it's unmistakably this symbol. Thin head bent around to the left and below, wide body and four stubby limbs.
@infowolf1 It's not a living duck or goose. It's been plucked and trussed. Think of a BBQ chicken with the head still attached.
If you can find it, take a look at better examples of this symbol. In Gardiner's book, the body is much fatter and rounder, and the limbs are smaller and tighter against the body, unmistakably a bird.
You might argue they are different symbols, but then they would have to have different sounds or meanings, which would be clear from the syntax of the writing.
@infowolf1 A few other points: this example is carved into stone, not drawn, so it's harder to draw fine detail. You can find many examples of "shortcuts" where the artisan cuts hieroglyphs the easiest way, in this case with the legs sprawling out instead of tight against the body.
Can you clarify whether you think this is symobl G54 or not? If so, why do most examples of this look exactly like trussed birds? If not, how could a different symbol make sense in the same sentence's context?
@infowolf1 you obviously didnt read my comment, then. (or realize that i have studied this language for 32 years....) but you need not be a scholar. its a fishing hook! we actually have them in museums, and they are IDENTICAL to their carving design. thick shaft (weighted, made of bone) with a curved hook. i mean, you really didnt get that?
@infowolf1 YES! THE HOOKS ARE IDENTICAL. i dont know why they made there hooks in that shape. yes, real things were used. NOT PLESIOSAURS! im not pretending to know egyptian, its actually only a hobby of mine as a teacher
@infowolf1 the egyptians werent ever vague with their language. they named everything. you wont find any reference to 'large creatures'. everything was named. but this is just an early kingdom fishing hook. and they used that style (as well as a few others) up till the second half of the hieratic period.
I'm not saying that a plesiosaur can't possibly exist today or back then. I'm simply saying that they would not have carved a plesiosaur onto the sarcophagus of such an important person. This area would be reserved for more important and relative things than "what this illiterate sailor saw a few nights ago".
I doubt that it is a plesiosaur. Such a beast of large size, rareness, and oddity would most likely become a monster, and therefore be more mentioned in ancient writing. Also, a plesiosaur is a deep-sea animal (as we can base off of Nessie's behaviors) that if seen would probably have been seen by an illiterate sailor, which only increases the chances that it would become a greatly exaggerated beast of lore if anyone believed him enough to write it on something of such value.
@scoty1123 How much do you understand about science, the scientific method, and the scientific community? Please define what you understand to be a scientific theory and what you understand to be a scientific fact.
Actually, I think I've solved this one. Earlier I posted that I thought it might be a lotus bud, but looking through my hieroglyphic signs lists I've realized it's a perfect match for the hieroglyph representing a plucked bird (think of a cooked goose with the neck and head still attached). The symbol is a phonogram pronounced "senedj".
Two things, one, a plesiosaur is not a dinosaur, it is a marine reptile.
Two, I actually study ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs and I will believe you are correct in saying that it is not a scorpion. It appears to me to be a lotus bud, though I cannot be for sure. It is of a different form than the lotus usually appears, but many of the hieroglyphs on that appear to be in a non-standard form. It looks like whoever inscriped them was using artistic license.
Please note, there are no kinds of evidence for any kind of extinction, anyone suggesting anything else need to rethink their claims! Claiming that evidence has shown something has gone extinct is just a wierd and outrageous claim!
Egyptian hieroglyphs were a formal writing system used by the ancient Egyptians that combined logographic and alphabetic elements. Egyptians used cursive hieroglyphs for religious literature on papyrus and wood.
It's a plesiosaur, plain and simple. Funny too because it's depicted above the waves. Maybe they're water breaching creatures. Not myth but fact, like every other depiction on it. They witnessed them, so they engraved them. Just like the caves in the grand canyon where there are drawings of brontosaurus and t-rex not far from depictions of mammoth hunts. They witnessed it so they depicted it.
@hippieshatewater Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some birds.
@gregrutz Please, dont start with this nonsense again! Havent you learned anything? Im starting to wonder if you have some kind of mental disorder, seriously.
@gregrutz Please, dont start with this nonsense again! Havent you learned anything? Im starting to wonder if you have some kind of mental disorder, seriously.
@gregrutz Please, dont start with this nonsense again! Havent you learned anything? Im starting to wonder if you have some kind of mental disorder, seriously.
@hippieshatewater Plesiosaurs (sensu Plesiosauroidea) appeared at the end of the Triassic Period and thrived until the K-T extinction, at the end of the Cretaceous Period. While they were Mesozoic diapsid reptiles that lived at the same time as dinosaurs, they were not dinosaurs.
@gregrutz The first five sentences are just nonsense. And once upon a time, there was a dinosaur called Brontosaurus, it was the largest animal that had ever been found, until it was revealed to have never existed in life because it was a mix between two different species of sauropods. You have to remember that not everyone knows that. You dont necessarily need to read a science book, read whatever you want to read.
@hippieshatewater Plesiosaurs (sensu Plesiosauroidea) appeared at the end of the Triassic Period and thrived until the K-T extinction, at the end of the Cretaceous Period. While they were Mesozoic diapsid reptiles that lived at the same time as dinosaurs, they were not dinosaurs.
Sorry tried to help you find your answer. Didn't like your rude comment when trying to help you. No not ignorant. It has a tail that resembles a scorpions.sorry that you cant find your answer. I've been to that exhibit. I'm researching in a later era.so will leave you to find your answer. If you cant it will show who is ignorant. That was insulting.
@hazeleyezes That "tail", which I dont think is a tail, does not look like a Scorpion tail, I bet we would easy recognize a Scorpion tail and BODY, it looks more like a long neck with a head at the end, and it has what looks like four flippers, and a smooth big body, it all mostly resembles a plesiosaur, or maybe even a more evolved pliosaur, but theres not much similarity with a Scorpion.
@TurokSwe Attn. Dummy. Plesiosaurs lived 100 million years ago. Not 3000 years ago, not 10,000 years ago, not a million years ago. 100 Million years ago ! FACT.
The Egyptians were living in 6000 BC.
Conclusion. It is not a Plesiosaur and there was no global flood.
@gregrutz "Attn"? Please, why do you always argue about that when we know its not something reliable? How do you know plesiosaurs ONLY lived supposedly 100 million years ago (65.5 million years ago to be correct) and not 10000-3000 years ago? You dont, except if youve seen all the individuals, which I highly doubt you have. Now you were fast in switching subject, it might most possibly be a plesiosaur, and we were not discussing any global flood! But I certainly believe a global flood did occur.
@Sammerkona That seems like a very odd Raptor, if it doesnt have two tails then I suppose it has feathers instead of a tail, and its head, or possible beak, and long legs seems like some kind of big bird, like a Stork, but the thing that seem to resemble a wing looks like an arm rather than a wing. Its a very strange creature.
@911mastermind No, it looks more like a plesiosaur than both mouse and dinosaur. If it was some kind of rodent then it has the strangest tail and body shape I have ever seen on a rodent. I doubt dinosaurs would have been mummified, but funny thought!
@gregrutz Dont tell me that you cant see the head??? How do you know its not a picture? I doubt you know that, you would have to live in the time when this picture was made and maybe to have been the one that made it to know what it really resembles, but still, it looks mostly like a plesiosaur.
@gregrutz This doesnt necessarily ahve to be an Elasmosaurus, it can be any type of plesiosaur or pliosaur, since they all have different appearance, it can even be an unknown type. The tail is there, its just a bit short, maybe they didnt see the whole tail, just a part and the rest of it might have been under water, or maybe it had lost its tail somehow, but im just saying who knows? The way the body ends at the possible tail fits with the description of a plesiosaur.
@TurokSwe and it might be a scorpion since they were common and Plesiosaurs went extinct 100 Million years ago. Why don't you show me scientific paper where someone who reads early Egyptian says it is not a scopion.
@gregrutz Yes, scorpions might have been common back then, but also plesiosaurs since they pribably never went extinct, certainly not millions of years ago. How am I supposed to find such a thing, especially when many scientists cant accept that plesiosaurs are still alive?
@gregrutz What is called "EVIDENCE" exactly? Show you one? Its not something easy you tell me to do, I believe plesiosaurs are definetely still alive, no doubts, and you certainly dont believe they are still alive, no doubts. Im not making anything up, but I can certainly remember that you have been making things up, no doubts! And that I cant show you a plesiosaur doesnt mean Im making things up, please, have you ever heard of a thing called "think", thats something you should start with.
@TurokSwe That the problem with Creatards, they don't know what ''EVIDENCE'' is. They don't even know the difference between science and religion.
.
Plesiosaurs stopped making fossils after the last great mass extinction on the earth, 65 million years ago. Finding one would only prove they didn't go extinct, so what?
Evolution does not say they had to go extinct, the evidence shows they went extinct. Think.
@gregrutz "Creatards", that was a new word, what do you mean by creatards? "stopped making fossils"? Sounds like you think plesiosaurs made all of Earths fossils. We dont know when the last fossil plesiosaur was fossilized, but I doubt it happened 65 million years ago. It would prove they didnt go extinct, yes, and it would also prove scientists were wrong about their supposed extinction. Yeah, so what? Evolution says it went extinct, evidence says its alive, it never said extinct. Think again!
@TurokSwe unless a fossil is found and dated to be from that time period, u can never be sure.
and another thing is that they loved cats, we all know that. Maybe the script was telling how cats love to eat mice. dont u thnk that is possible? cuz it makes sense.
and there is also those birds and snakes and fish and water. so maybe its telling that cats hate water, eat mice, fish, snake and are scared of ox (maybe cuz of big size)
@911mastermind Fossils that might be from that time might have already been found, but all of us might not have been told, we can probably never know what has been and what has not been found. No, we dont know that they loved cats, we assume they loved cats. Everything is possible, but I certainly dont believe thats what this picture resembles, it doesnt make as much sense as you might think. I doubt thats what it all means, I think they might have shown the things that they saw in their time.
@TurokSwe they loved their rulers, so they mummified them. so from that u assume they loved cats as well, cuz they were also mumified. by love i mean that they had respect for cats.
They dont get anything by hiding such info. Since u and I are not proper scientists, we have to just take their word for it. If ur really interested in finding out the truth, u shud become a proper scientist by taking a full time university course in archaeology etc...
@911mastermind How do we know they loved/respected their rulers just because they mummified them? I dont think we know that, its just what some of us believe. You never know, maybe they gets more peace and a more calmed society. No, we dont have to, and yes, I am really interested in finding out the truth, but I would certainly not become a "proper" scientist, which would not help me much in truth-seeking, Im sticking to reality, which is at least more reliable. P.S. I am studying archeology.
@TurokSwe by "proper" , i meant a properly educated person who has certified qualification from a known university.
its a good thing ur studying archeology, especially if u have an interest in it. best of luck. I hope u find the truth.
common people like me dont really care about dinosaurs etc....If they are still out there right now, its still not a problem. Mankind will find a way to get them extinct...thats wat we're best at doing, killing other creatures.
For everyone that has a common sense, we can clearly see that this picture mostly resembles a plesiosaur and not a beaver, not a bird, not a scorpion, not a turtle, not a snake, not a hook and not your mom. Are you all so ignorant and foolish that you cant see that? Its so obvious!
@TurokSwe Our eyes show us what's not there just as much as your eyes show you what is. I think a more important question is why does it matter? The amount of time, money, and energy that goes into unearthing the past or sending junk up into space is amazing. The planet is in a tailspin here and now. I don't have any idea what it is and frankly, neither do you. I do know to berate people for thinking it's nonsense or at least non-important is a little childish.
@gregrutz No, my former brainwashed mind does certainly not playing tricks on me. No, I see what I can see with my eyes, and sometimes I can even see parts of my future. Yes it is a picture that resembles a part of a language, but thats irrelevant, please leave that.
@gregrutz It is not certainly strong evidence, but it could be a part of everything that proves plesiosaurs are still alive, or at least were at the end of prehistory, 3000 BC.
Very interesting! It looks a little like a sauropod dinosaur, but it is most similar to a plesiosaur, a marine (non-dinosaur) reptile, as far as I can see, it doesnt resemble any other animal. Good video!
Sorry kiddies, but it’s the hieroglyph of a plucked duck prepared for consumption or sacrifice (with the consonantal transliteration of “snd“ or “snt“), and it means “timid, fear”. And it’s the origins of the Sa’idic Coptic Egyptian word “cnad” or “cnat” (“fear”) -- s=c in Coptic. I used to collect dinosaur toys when I was a boy also. Have fun.
jumbomojokat 19 hours ago
erection.
buayabatam 6 days ago
People should understand that everything you're taught at school is not 100% fact, sometimes something gets proven wrong, but if there is no replacement, they leave it there. Diniosaurs being one of those things, there are still some dinosaurs. Ever head of the Mokele-mbembe or the Loch Ness Monster? well, there real and there many witnesses that have seen them. So the question is not, HOW did dinos go extinct? But instead DID they ALL go extint?.
BUNGLE7777777 1 week ago
tadpole.
DemoraX 1 week ago
Correction, an Elasmasaurus. A plesiosaur has a longer tail.
vampirebelenus 1 week ago
I'm going to keep my mind open to the possibility that this is a depiction of a plesiosaurus. Do this, type plesiosaurus or plesiosaur into any search window, Yahoo, Bing, Google etc and click on images then take another look at this video. Can we say we definitely know that it is not a plesiosaur even though it sure looks like one. The Egyptians were not sloppy with their heiroglyphs and I've never seen a duck with four feet. If you don't agree based on what you see, that's cool.
vampirebelenus 1 week ago
Scorpions look like silverfish, but depictions are rare, because this animal was feared; search for Serqet(Selkis), her name is written: door bolt(S)-mouth(R)-hill(Q)-loaf of bread(T). "Your" hieroglyph is a part of a blessing for a dead person( Egyptians had hoped, that afterlife would be exactly like this one, only without suffering), and means: (may you catch) a plenty of aquatic fowl, when you hunt in the reeds, sort of "have fun".
nebetet 1 week ago
not a scorpion at all, it does look like a pleiosaur
wotan237 1 week ago
looks like a scorpion..
davycrocketful 1 week ago
Nessy from loch ness
PalePharaoh 1 week ago
Kids post the darndest videos.
LeafFreedom 2 weeks ago
To me, it mostly looks like the overactive imagination of someone who watched one to many conspiracy videos
GapWim 2 weeks ago
scorpion is what it looks like
wolfstarzz 2 weeks ago
It's Nessie!!!
No, wait it's just a hyrogliph...darn.
AngelaJKerns 2 weeks ago
totally. yep. thats a dinosaur if i ever saw one. but seriously, it looks more like a fishing hook to me. i wonder what the translation of the writing says.
TheCyberPotato 3 weeks ago
Looks like a symbol to me. I think they used to use them instead of words.
Nidmeister 3 weeks ago
wtf is wrong with you man? get this shit off the internet
CarvelJFru 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
CarvelJFru 3 weeks ago
ancient civilization are so mysterious ... and thats why they are so amazing
brandons3 3 weeks ago
No, it is not a dinosaur dummy.
gregrutz 3 weeks ago
its a stingray with hands and feets. duh
Richex112 3 weeks ago
Yeah, that's what E. A. Wallis Budge thought, too; that it was an elasmosaur.
TasiaBrooklyn 4 weeks ago
I looks like Nessy. But how did the ancient Egytians know about the Loch Ness monster?...
DarthElius 1 month ago
It's a Jew.
:)
MooPotPie 1 month ago
It's NOT a scorpion? It's NOT a SERIOUS VIDEO!
RicardCastro 1 month ago
it s a scorpio !!! dumb ! look at the astrology books ! there is the same draw ! and even though there were dinosaurs , what s the importance ?... The last dinosaurs were reptiles like pteranodon ( so see babylonian and sumer civilisations) and birds ! no t-rex or something else
taniadevasconcelos 1 month ago
From experience it looks like "crabs" to me. 1:19 Surfer dude...
meelOOkintoo 1 month ago
UFO 1:58
AveNoctis 1 month ago
i saw a cross under the dinosaur so i think they were Catholics to.
proyect070109 1 month ago
Even if it does resemble s dinosaur, why aren't there dinosaur bodies with human bodies where they apparently "coexisted?"
Jakster840 1 month ago
it is a scorpion
movadoband 1 month ago
IT'S A LIZARD. GO AND LOOK SOME PICTURES OF DINASOURS.
ROBECABAL 1 month ago
No doubt about it. There were plesiosaurs in the desert of ancient Egypt.
eventhisidistaken 1 month ago
I think this is Scorpion^^
kamranrisen1 1 month ago
Which squiggle is the dinosaur?
zhalfirim 1 month ago
Parece un plesiosaurio.
ACWW7 1 month ago
anything's possible
elmciti 1 month ago 2
Yes, the Sphinx was real to.
DaddyOD13 1 month ago
@DaddyOD13...."to" is incorrect. "Too" is what you wanted to use. Don't taze me, bro. I just want you to be know better-be better.
GuerillaInThaMidst 1 month ago
@GuerillaInThaMidst You'd be the bestest English teacher ever.
DaddyOD13 1 month ago
or a scorpion
codydorman420 1 month ago
Ok so where is the chase and how do I cut to it? Seriously though, this could quite easily be a fishing hook, a trussed bird or possibly the hieroglyph for the consonants kp.
gracefulblades001 1 month ago
the egyptians worshipped baboons. second, thats a goat, and OMG, it wouldve helped if you knew anything about egypt before visiting the british museum. that last glyph is a BARBED fishing hook they used (and it stands for the syllable 'mii'. the think body is because of the way it was made, kind of as a weight. we have the actual examples
guineapiggyman 2 months ago
I think it looks more like an elasmosaurus than a trussed goose. If they had to truss the wings, why didn't they truss the neck? I think you people who want it to be a trussed goose are denying what is in plain sight. South American peoples carved Spinosaurus, Triceritops and other dinosaurs on stones, yet somehow these are fakes when all the others are authentic, even if the oxidation study shows the dinosaur carvings to be hundreds of years old. You evolutionists are just in denial.
357MagnumBob 2 months ago
Its a scorpion with no claws....DUUUUUUUUUU!!!
taylormadeclowns 2 months ago
looks like a mouse ..... which egypt was plagued with in their grain storage areas
MrRedneckcracker 2 months ago
This is what it is a muraeonsaurus.
Donald10022 2 months ago
I am not sure what you mean by the designation, I am talking about time point
2:12 to the right of the obvious snake, to the left of the line, below the horned
snake or basilisk, and above the zigzag line. that is a pleisiosaur, it has a tail
too obvious for a plucked bird, and ALL the legs are the same length, while
the neck is far too long for even a duck. that it is carved makes no difference,
all the other carvings are very precise. authotities just called it only thing they knew in life.
infowolf1 2 months ago
@infowolf1 its not an animal . read my above response......(im an egyptologist, btw)
guineapiggyman 2 months ago
the return of imhotep in the mummy 4
icametorock1 2 months ago
what kind of dino????? scorpian
TheSinjingideon 2 months ago
SCORPIAN
MrRodney1204 2 months ago
It's a fishing lure, duh! Did you know they fished? And we got the fishing lure from them. Actually I'm joking but it does resemble a lure and if I acted serious enough people would probably believe it. But who knows maybe it's the Loch Ness monster?
mexicub 2 months ago
LOL @ it looks like a dinosaur, WE WANT OUR TREASIRES BACK! you british thieves.
necromancerification 2 months ago
i think some of a these are astrological signs this look like scorpio
lryb3871 2 months ago
Scorpion..........
Hopsnbarley 2 months ago
athiests are fools
mdebbiec1 2 months ago
the dinosaur looks like a scorpion..
TrenteSylphs 3 months ago
I immediately thought of a plesiosaur the instant I saw it and I saw it way before the video prompt asked 'What is this?"
AndyG792 3 months ago
Everyone watching this research the video on YT "Dragon's or Dinosaurs" and see the evidence for yourself.
Keep in mind, this is coming from an atheist.
watch?v=AeHDCfRzrXk
3rdEYEbeHolder 3 months ago
Hey yeah, it dose look alot like a plesiosaur.....just like Nessy in Loch Ness Scotland, or Ogopogo in Okanagan Lake British Columbia
IIzZigZagZzII 3 months ago
Also... sorry to be a hardcore nitpicker, but neither plesiosaurs nor elasmosaurs were dinosaurs.
Marsyas2 3 months ago
@Marsyas2 Well, we all know that but, if you look in just about ANY dinosaur book they are included with them.
AndyG792 3 months ago
yes they build the pyramids with aliens and after that they had done a trip in their ufo to visit loch ness...
laurentdasheep 3 months ago
Why does everyone have to make a mountain out of a mole hill? I mean seriously? It's a carving made thousands of years ago, unless you have a time machine and can go back and ask the egyptians if they owned dinosaurs im pretty dam sure it's just them making symbols. To be honest that thing above it looks like a worm with a bow on it. I guess they had GIANT worms that they trained too huh? Come on...
megamixa 3 months ago
@megamixa There is MUCH physical evidence that dinosaurs and man were contemporaneous. ONe of many videos is do a you tube search of Dennis Swift and watch all 3 of his videos 1 - 3 of 3 videos called "Caught In the Act" with Dr Carl Baugh
He shows a couple of totem poles with dinosaurs and man attacking each other. There are many others also. If you truly want to seek the truth, the information is out there and easy to find.
AndyG792 3 months ago
@AndyG792
There is much physical evidence that "dinosaurs" walk this earth today. Just because you say Dinosaur doesn't mean it's a prehistoric reptile running around smashing people. Squirrels are dinosaurs by definition but you don't see me on CNN holding one up saying I found the missing link do you? Evolution changes animals over time, what was once a giant bird is now a falcon and so on... Thats my point.
megamixa 3 months ago
@megamixa "Squirrels are dinosaurs by definition..."
How so?
Marsyas2 3 months ago
I found this symbol in Gardiner's "Egyptian Grammar", 3rd edition, symbol G54 under "birds". It's identified as a "trussed goose or duck". For example, it's used as the determinant in a word meaning "to wring the neck of birds".
There's a certain amount of variation in hieroglyphs, but it's unmistakably this symbol. Thin head bent around to the left and below, wide body and four stubby limbs.
Marsyas2 3 months ago 14
@Marsyas2 thank God there still are people who actually have read something...
Mrbackandbeyond 3 months ago
@Marsyas2 of course it is going to be identified that way what duck or goose has
a tail like that? the obvious is impossible so it isn't what it looks like but..... IT IS
A PLEISIOSAUR! Nessie, and some South American and African examples exist
alive today, locals shown sketches of various dinosaurs and current reptiles
invariably pick out the dinos! check Dr. Dino or stagevu dot com for dragons or dinosaurs
infowolf1 2 months ago
@infowolf1 It's not a living duck or goose. It's been plucked and trussed. Think of a BBQ chicken with the head still attached.
If you can find it, take a look at better examples of this symbol. In Gardiner's book, the body is much fatter and rounder, and the limbs are smaller and tighter against the body, unmistakably a bird.
You might argue they are different symbols, but then they would have to have different sounds or meanings, which would be clear from the syntax of the writing.
Marsyas2 2 months ago
@infowolf1 A few other points: this example is carved into stone, not drawn, so it's harder to draw fine detail. You can find many examples of "shortcuts" where the artisan cuts hieroglyphs the easiest way, in this case with the legs sprawling out instead of tight against the body.
Can you clarify whether you think this is symobl G54 or not? If so, why do most examples of this look exactly like trussed birds? If not, how could a different symbol make sense in the same sentence's context?
Marsyas2 2 months ago
@infowolf1 read my above comment, its NOT an animal at all
guineapiggyman 2 months ago
@guineapiggyman I read your comment, and I disagree. you are assuming
something can't be something therefore it isn't. I am looking at it as it is, on
its own terms so to speak, and all the symbols are very precisely cut. That
thing is a pleisiosaur. Egyptian hieroglyphics are a humongous amount, and
it is likely that whatever it is supposed to mean there, as a syllable, is also
represented elsewhere by something else. If it were a trussed duck, the tail
wouldn't be so obvious, front legs longer
infowolf1 2 months ago
@infowolf1 you obviously didnt read my comment, then. (or realize that i have studied this language for 32 years....) but you need not be a scholar. its a fishing hook! we actually have them in museums, and they are IDENTICAL to their carving design. thick shaft (weighted, made of bone) with a curved hook. i mean, you really didnt get that?
guineapiggyman 2 months ago
@guineapiggyman sure, the head and neck could be a curved hook, but
what about those equal length legs, the shape of the body and that tail?
do your hooks have all those? or are you reading this as hook you can
recognize plus whatever that is tied on? I don't pretend to know Egyptian,
but that is not the point. Real things and geometric symbols were used in
hieroglyphics. Does anyone know of another fishing hook symbol that is
a bit different in use?
infowolf1 2 months ago
@infowolf1 YES! THE HOOKS ARE IDENTICAL. i dont know why they made there hooks in that shape. yes, real things were used. NOT PLESIOSAURS! im not pretending to know egyptian, its actually only a hobby of mine as a teacher
guineapiggyman 2 months ago
@infowolf1 not to mention that every animal the egyptians EVER saw, was well documented at some point, so where are their plesiosaur accounts? huh?
guineapiggyman 2 months ago
@guineapiggyman I don't know, I haven't read much of their literature. And I don't know
whether or not you have either. Anything translated monster or large
river animal or whatever that is not explicitly crocodilian and nothing
else, might have been such a thing. Since the ones reported are
violent and territorial in behavior, there probably weren't very many.
infowolf1 2 months ago
@infowolf1 the egyptians werent ever vague with their language. they named everything. you wont find any reference to 'large creatures'. everything was named. but this is just an early kingdom fishing hook. and they used that style (as well as a few others) up till the second half of the hieratic period.
guineapiggyman 2 months ago
i didnt even watch the whole thing because you took too long sorry
video sucks
jmastercha 3 months ago
It's not a dinosaur it's a leviathan read the bible!
SWNZReviews 3 months ago
@SWNZReviews fuck the bible you prick. take your fairy tale book and kick rocks.
o0zeroeffect0o 3 months ago
@o0zeroeffect0o wow.... tough guy
SWNZReviews 3 months ago
@SWNZReviews damn right... want a hug? a sticker?
o0zeroeffect0o 3 months ago
by the way, I would find it quite strange for it to be any beast, because it doesn't seem to be facing left, like the rest of the companions there.
6casi8modo9 3 months ago
2:17 for the scorp.. for the thing.
6casi8modo9 3 months ago
I'm not saying that a plesiosaur can't possibly exist today or back then. I'm simply saying that they would not have carved a plesiosaur onto the sarcophagus of such an important person. This area would be reserved for more important and relative things than "what this illiterate sailor saw a few nights ago".
ThePhilosopher23 3 months ago
I doubt that it is a plesiosaur. Such a beast of large size, rareness, and oddity would most likely become a monster, and therefore be more mentioned in ancient writing. Also, a plesiosaur is a deep-sea animal (as we can base off of Nessie's behaviors) that if seen would probably have been seen by an illiterate sailor, which only increases the chances that it would become a greatly exaggerated beast of lore if anyone believed him enough to write it on something of such value.
ThePhilosopher23 3 months ago
@ThePhilosopher23 It's a leviathan it's mentioned several times in the Bible. (ancient text)
SWNZReviews 3 months ago
@SWNZReviews Sorry, I meant ancient Egyptian writing (which my comment was about), unfortunately my mind is faster than my hands.
ThePhilosopher23 3 months ago
alll the people in the carvings look like they had boners
o0LanternLight0o 3 months ago
well for those of you who say they study this stuff science is only theory and not fact i say it looks like a marine reptile sound like arrrh lol
scoty1123 3 months ago
@scoty1123 How much do you understand about science, the scientific method, and the scientific community? Please define what you understand to be a scientific theory and what you understand to be a scientific fact.
ThePhilosopher23 3 months ago
Its jesus face!!
ash31male 3 months ago
THAT'S a dinosaur? gtfo....
DjRawd0g 4 months ago
Comment removed
esdras78 4 months ago
Actually, I think I've solved this one. Earlier I posted that I thought it might be a lotus bud, but looking through my hieroglyphic signs lists I've realized it's a perfect match for the hieroglyph representing a plucked bird (think of a cooked goose with the neck and head still attached). The symbol is a phonogram pronounced "senedj".
keenanwin 4 months ago
it is a pokemon... :P
g0ribabanik 4 months ago 2
Two things, one, a plesiosaur is not a dinosaur, it is a marine reptile.
Two, I actually study ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs and I will believe you are correct in saying that it is not a scorpion. It appears to me to be a lotus bud, though I cannot be for sure. It is of a different form than the lotus usually appears, but many of the hieroglyphs on that appear to be in a non-standard form. It looks like whoever inscriped them was using artistic license.
Interesting video, though.
keenanwin 4 months ago
fishing hook
Fpockets 4 months ago
It's just a typo.
Haideez1 4 months ago 23
@Haideez1 Use a little logic here please. ... or are you just being funny in a satirical way?.
AndyG792 3 months ago
@Haideez1 LMAO...good reply.
katasstrophy 3 months ago
Is this a joke? lol people are all serious and shit. It's obviously aliens.
TpendragonT 4 months ago
Please note, there are no kinds of evidence for any kind of extinction, anyone suggesting anything else need to rethink their claims! Claiming that evidence has shown something has gone extinct is just a wierd and outrageous claim!
TurokSwe 4 months ago
Egyptian hieroglyphs were a formal writing system used by the ancient Egyptians that combined logographic and alphabetic elements. Egyptians used cursive hieroglyphs for religious literature on papyrus and wood.
That is not a dinosaur anyway.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz Yes, its a hieroglyph, and its not a dinosaur, more likely a plesiosaur probably.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
That is not a bird, an eye or an owl. You are looking at a language.
And it does not look like a dinosaur anyway.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz Thats your opinion. Yes, it does not look like a dinosaur, but it has small sauropod features, but it matches better with plesiosaurs.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@gregrutz Thats your opinion. Yes, it does not look like a dinosaur, but it has small sauropod features, but it matches better with plesiosaurs.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
It's a plesiosaur, plain and simple. Funny too because it's depicted above the waves. Maybe they're water breaching creatures. Not myth but fact, like every other depiction on it. They witnessed them, so they engraved them. Just like the caves in the grand canyon where there are drawings of brontosaurus and t-rex not far from depictions of mammoth hunts. They witnessed it so they depicted it.
hippieshatewater 4 months ago
@hippieshatewater Dinosaurs were the dominant terrestrial vertebrates for over 160 million years, from the late Triassic period (230 million years ago) until the end of the Cretaceous period (65 million years ago), when the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event caused the extinction of most dinosaur species, except for some birds.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz Please, dont start with this nonsense again! Havent you learned anything? Im starting to wonder if you have some kind of mental disorder, seriously.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@gregrutz Please, dont start with this nonsense again! Havent you learned anything? Im starting to wonder if you have some kind of mental disorder, seriously.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gregrutz Please, dont start with this nonsense again! Havent you learned anything? Im starting to wonder if you have some kind of mental disorder, seriously.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@hippieshatewater Plesiosaurs (sensu Plesiosauroidea) appeared at the end of the Triassic Period and thrived until the K-T extinction, at the end of the Cretaceous Period. While they were Mesozoic diapsid reptiles that lived at the same time as dinosaurs, they were not dinosaurs.
Wikipedia
There is no such thing as brontosaurus.
Read a science book.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz The first five sentences are just nonsense. And once upon a time, there was a dinosaur called Brontosaurus, it was the largest animal that had ever been found, until it was revealed to have never existed in life because it was a mix between two different species of sauropods. You have to remember that not everyone knows that. You dont necessarily need to read a science book, read whatever you want to read.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hippieshatewater Plesiosaurs (sensu Plesiosauroidea) appeared at the end of the Triassic Period and thrived until the K-T extinction, at the end of the Cretaceous Period. While they were Mesozoic diapsid reptiles that lived at the same time as dinosaurs, they were not dinosaurs.
Wikipedia
There is no such thing as brontosaurus.
Read a science book.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@hippieshatewater Absolutely true!
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@hippieshatewater Absolutely true!
TurokSwe 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hippieshatewater Absolutely true!
TurokSwe 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@hippieshatewater Absolutely true!
TurokSwe 4 months ago
Sorry tried to help you find your answer. Didn't like your rude comment when trying to help you. No not ignorant. It has a tail that resembles a scorpions.sorry that you cant find your answer. I've been to that exhibit. I'm researching in a later era.so will leave you to find your answer. If you cant it will show who is ignorant. That was insulting.
hazeleyezes 4 months ago
@hazeleyezes That "tail", which I dont think is a tail, does not look like a Scorpion tail, I bet we would easy recognize a Scorpion tail and BODY, it looks more like a long neck with a head at the end, and it has what looks like four flippers, and a smooth big body, it all mostly resembles a plesiosaur, or maybe even a more evolved pliosaur, but theres not much similarity with a Scorpion.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe Attn. Dummy. Plesiosaurs lived 100 million years ago. Not 3000 years ago, not 10,000 years ago, not a million years ago. 100 Million years ago ! FACT.
The Egyptians were living in 6000 BC.
Conclusion. It is not a Plesiosaur and there was no global flood.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz "Attn"? Please, why do you always argue about that when we know its not something reliable? How do you know plesiosaurs ONLY lived supposedly 100 million years ago (65.5 million years ago to be correct) and not 10000-3000 years ago? You dont, except if youve seen all the individuals, which I highly doubt you have. Now you were fast in switching subject, it might most possibly be a plesiosaur, and we were not discussing any global flood! But I certainly believe a global flood did occur.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
These are hieroglyphics. Letters depicting myth, curse, events, etc. see wikipedia the 26th dynasty and links to details hope this helps
hazeleyezes 4 months ago
and also there is somekind of water snake with "ears"
misvivencias 4 months ago
Even more interesting is the raptor right next to the flying saucer (and occupant) at 1:51. Go see for yourself.
Sammerkona 4 months ago
@Sammerkona That seems like a very odd Raptor, if it doesnt have two tails then I suppose it has feathers instead of a tail, and its head, or possible beak, and long legs seems like some kind of big bird, like a Stork, but the thing that seem to resemble a wing looks like an arm rather than a wing. Its a very strange creature.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
its a mouse...
911mastermind 4 months ago
@911mastermind Not a mouse either.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe common man, it looks more mousy than dinosaur...
maybe it was some other small mouse like animal...
cuz had there been dinosaur, they may just have mummified that as well....heheheh
911mastermind 4 months ago
@911mastermind No, it looks more like a plesiosaur than both mouse and dinosaur. If it was some kind of rodent then it has the strangest tail and body shape I have ever seen on a rodent. I doubt dinosaurs would have been mummified, but funny thought!
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe Plesiosaurs have heads, and this is a writting not a picture.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz Dont tell me that you cant see the head??? How do you know its not a picture? I doubt you know that, you would have to live in the time when this picture was made and maybe to have been the one that made it to know what it really resembles, but still, it looks mostly like a plesiosaur.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe IF that is a head then it has really big ears.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz I dont think thats ears, more likely the eyes.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe Sorry I was looking at the wrong end since Elasmasaurus HAS A TAIL.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz This doesnt necessarily ahve to be an Elasmosaurus, it can be any type of plesiosaur or pliosaur, since they all have different appearance, it can even be an unknown type. The tail is there, its just a bit short, maybe they didnt see the whole tail, just a part and the rest of it might have been under water, or maybe it had lost its tail somehow, but im just saying who knows? The way the body ends at the possible tail fits with the description of a plesiosaur.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe and it might be a scorpion since they were common and Plesiosaurs went extinct 100 Million years ago. Why don't you show me scientific paper where someone who reads early Egyptian says it is not a scopion.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz Yes, scorpions might have been common back then, but also plesiosaurs since they pribably never went extinct, certainly not millions of years ago. How am I supposed to find such a thing, especially when many scientists cant accept that plesiosaurs are still alive?
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe It is called EVIDENCE. If you claim there are Plesiosaurs alive to day then show us one ! IF you can't then stop making shit up.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz What is called "EVIDENCE" exactly? Show you one? Its not something easy you tell me to do, I believe plesiosaurs are definetely still alive, no doubts, and you certainly dont believe they are still alive, no doubts. Im not making anything up, but I can certainly remember that you have been making things up, no doubts! And that I cant show you a plesiosaur doesnt mean Im making things up, please, have you ever heard of a thing called "think", thats something you should start with.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe That the problem with Creatards, they don't know what ''EVIDENCE'' is. They don't even know the difference between science and religion.
.
Plesiosaurs stopped making fossils after the last great mass extinction on the earth, 65 million years ago. Finding one would only prove they didn't go extinct, so what?
Evolution does not say they had to go extinct, the evidence shows they went extinct. Think.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz "Creatards", that was a new word, what do you mean by creatards? "stopped making fossils"? Sounds like you think plesiosaurs made all of Earths fossils. We dont know when the last fossil plesiosaur was fossilized, but I doubt it happened 65 million years ago. It would prove they didnt go extinct, yes, and it would also prove scientists were wrong about their supposed extinction. Yeah, so what? Evolution says it went extinct, evidence says its alive, it never said extinct. Think again!
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe unless a fossil is found and dated to be from that time period, u can never be sure.
and another thing is that they loved cats, we all know that. Maybe the script was telling how cats love to eat mice. dont u thnk that is possible? cuz it makes sense.
and there is also those birds and snakes and fish and water. so maybe its telling that cats hate water, eat mice, fish, snake and are scared of ox (maybe cuz of big size)
:D
911mastermind 4 months ago
@911mastermind Fossils that might be from that time might have already been found, but all of us might not have been told, we can probably never know what has been and what has not been found. No, we dont know that they loved cats, we assume they loved cats. Everything is possible, but I certainly dont believe thats what this picture resembles, it doesnt make as much sense as you might think. I doubt thats what it all means, I think they might have shown the things that they saw in their time.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe they loved their rulers, so they mummified them. so from that u assume they loved cats as well, cuz they were also mumified. by love i mean that they had respect for cats.
They dont get anything by hiding such info. Since u and I are not proper scientists, we have to just take their word for it. If ur really interested in finding out the truth, u shud become a proper scientist by taking a full time university course in archaeology etc...
thank you
911mastermind 4 months ago
@911mastermind How do we know they loved/respected their rulers just because they mummified them? I dont think we know that, its just what some of us believe. You never know, maybe they gets more peace and a more calmed society. No, we dont have to, and yes, I am really interested in finding out the truth, but I would certainly not become a "proper" scientist, which would not help me much in truth-seeking, Im sticking to reality, which is at least more reliable. P.S. I am studying archeology.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe by "proper" , i meant a properly educated person who has certified qualification from a known university.
its a good thing ur studying archeology, especially if u have an interest in it. best of luck. I hope u find the truth.
common people like me dont really care about dinosaurs etc....If they are still out there right now, its still not a problem. Mankind will find a way to get them extinct...thats wat we're best at doing, killing other creatures.
911mastermind 4 months ago
So, on this coffin, used coffin, there are a bunch of bird images, and one sea monster? Oh, and a snake with bunny ears.
twentyoh5 4 months ago
@twentyoh5 I dont think the snake had bunny ears, but rather some kind of crest, snakes with crests have been reported in lots of places.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
For everyone that has a common sense, we can clearly see that this picture mostly resembles a plesiosaur and not a beaver, not a bird, not a scorpion, not a turtle, not a snake, not a hook and not your mom. Are you all so ignorant and foolish that you cant see that? Its so obvious!
TurokSwe 4 months ago 7
@TurokSwe Our eyes show us what's not there just as much as your eyes show you what is. I think a more important question is why does it matter? The amount of time, money, and energy that goes into unearthing the past or sending junk up into space is amazing. The planet is in a tailspin here and now. I don't have any idea what it is and frankly, neither do you. I do know to berate people for thinking it's nonsense or at least non-important is a little childish.
jreliford34 4 months ago
@jreliford34 Good point!
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe Your brainwashed mind is playing tricks on you, You see what you want to see. It is not even a drawing or a picture,
IT IS A LETTER IN THEIR ALPHABET.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz No, my former brainwashed mind does certainly not playing tricks on me. No, I see what I can see with my eyes, and sometimes I can even see parts of my future. Yes it is a picture that resembles a part of a language, but thats irrelevant, please leave that.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe OK Let's pretend it is a picture of a Elasmasaurus or a plesiosaur. Sooooooooo?
What does thay prove Mr. Logical Evidence guy? Please tell us.
gregrutz 4 months ago
@gregrutz It is not certainly strong evidence, but it could be a part of everything that proves plesiosaurs are still alive, or at least were at the end of prehistory, 3000 BC.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@TurokSwe
Commons sense... yeah, it's much more probable that that thing is a dinosaur, and not just a FUCKED SCORPION!! YEAH, SURE!
solleticosoffro 3 months ago
@TurokSwe I agree! Looks like a plesiosaur to me. I saw it before it was pointed out.
AndyG792 3 months ago
It's a scorpion
hazeleyezes 4 months ago
@hazeleyezes Its certainly not a Scorpion.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
Very interesting! It looks a little like a sauropod dinosaur, but it is most similar to a plesiosaur, a marine (non-dinosaur) reptile, as far as I can see, it doesnt resemble any other animal. Good video!
TurokSwe 4 months ago
FAKE!!!
seattraining1 4 months ago
@seattraining1 NOT FAKE!!!
TurokSwe 4 months ago
water bird, loon
twentyoh5 4 months ago
@twentyoh5 Its clearly not a water bird.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
For all you skeptics, please explain these,
youtube.com/watch?v=klRbcEnLPbU
youtube.com/watch?v=bRkSVdRslQs
and on Google earth, these unnatural underwater features off Graham Island west coast Canada
For the best view, you need to GO UNDERWAATER and "pan" up horizontal 52°38'57.87"N 132°19'21.31"W
and 52° 9'41.60"N 131°45'3.96"W
and 51°58'4.59"N 131°31'16.43"W
Dont worry about the lines in the mud, these are radar anomalies. Just explain the precise repetitive shapes.
bondigold 4 months ago
long necked (snake neck) tortise ?
AIZALI 4 months ago
@AIZALI Interesting idea, but no, I dont think so.
TurokSwe 4 months ago
@wonka2112 LMAO!!! X)
... but... you're still a fuc*ing communist, pot-head...
rgs11 4 months ago
omg...where do I sign up to get this three minutes of my life back?
jreliford34 4 months ago