Added: 4 years ago
From: 74flateric
Views: 57,171
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Right through the window of the white house

  • Ну что то в грузии,столько самолетов сбили,позорище.ептвую мать

  • The Tu-160 is a glorious feat of engineering for the kind of war that we'll likely never see again. Wars of sophisticated weapons systems, force continuum, and large numbers of soldiers. The U.S. is fighting the new type of war, based on agitation of minorities, lies on a grand scale not even considered by Goebbels, engineered bankruptcy, and social chaos by terrorism. We then astound the world by blaming the victim!

    Add the underhanded cowardice of armed drones and you have the new war.

  • looks like a copy of the b1

  • @USAmilitarypower hovno.

  • did he say Vladimir Putin?

  • what this song called

  • better then the Tomahawk?

  • Don't mess with Vladimir Putin if you don't want to get bombs on top of your home.

  • 0.42 ВАУ

  • @CBlackjr -- USA army killed over 1.3 Million Iraqi people 7 Million refugees

    Pick up a paper you see blank space next to yotube put there Number of killed in Iraq and click SEARCH. IF you need more instructions respond.

    CNN brainwashing you every TV has CNN news in USA even on times square add than propaganda NO STOP.

  • In mother Russia, the missile tests you.

  • @CBlackjr -- SOVIET RED ARMY with The largest Nuclear Stockpile on Earth went to Afghanistan to kill woman and Children ... It is so transparent LIE.

    IS that what CNN thought you.

  • @aviomaster Jesus pick up a paper, the US has the largest Stockpiles of Nukes. Not sure i understand why Russia would move Nukes to Afghanistan, you must be smokin that Chernobyl weed. CNN thought me? I don't think anyone at CNN even knows me.

  • @CBlackjr Hey, CBlackjr, just correcting you... US doesn't have the biggest stockpiles of nukes since 1975. You can also search for that info at the UN website (I tried to copy-paste the link here, but for some reason it doesn`t work...)

  • @danielyacosta found it, I stand corrected

  • RUSSIA builds missiles to destroy USA  aircraft carriers ,

    USA builds weapons to kill poor and defenseless in Iraq and Afghanistan Libya etc.

  • @aviomaster excecpt when it comes down to it Russians actually aim for the women and children. Russian tactics are brutal and down right barbaric. Need i remind you of the atrocities in Russia's Afghan war? He who is without sin can throw the first stone, any takers?

  • @CBlackjr copy this into you tube: Расстрел американскими военными мирных жителей Ирака and see.

    with love from Russia

  • @Nariman5336 saw the first few seconds and i've already seen it many times. They had thought they were insurgents and gunner was told they were and many innocent people killed including children and a reporters. Still it doesn't match the atrocities committed by Russia in Afganistan which aren't on youtube.

  • @CBlackjr

    I'm not against you, you are good guys, but also in Russia, not all barbarians. in any country there are bad people and I think that we should not dub all under one.

    Forgive my English, it's Google translator

  • @Nariman5336 I not against Russia either, in war horrible things happen and in every war things happen that we not meant to happen.

    The English works translator

  • Kh-666 SATAN cooler name

  • Zivela majka Russia !!!

  • Yah, if US president fly small subsonic jet onto carrier, Russian president fly giant SUPERsonic jet that can sink carrier!

  • The best cruise missiles are actually the Kh-32 and P-700/3M45 Granit, both of which are anti-shipping cruise missiles designed to destroy large surface combatants (read: American Carriers). Both of which are very potent, and would be EXTREMELY hard to counter for us, because we put all our money on being able to destroy the bombers (or in the case of the P-700, submarines) carrying the missiles BEFORE they're launched. It's a fine strategy, but if anything gets through... Ouch.

  • ...so it can carry AGM and bombs?

  • @AstroChickenII Yes and it can also carry nukes.

  • Comment removed

  • He actually went with them on a flight and a missile test? He must have interpreted the Bush carrier landing as a challenge lol.

  • yep, but he did flew the Blackjack that was excorting other Tu-160 that actually performed launch

  • hahaahah that house burns and they take pictures xDD

  • Tu-160 all the way!!

  • @packgen b2!!!!!!!!!!

  • On the other hand, Russia has the following WMD's: KH-101 Raduga weighing up to 2,400kg is a solid propellant, 1,000 kg explosive war head activated upon impact, with a TERCKOM + TV scanner navigation, capable of 3,000-5,000km range.The relationship between the Kh-555 and the Kh-101, with evidently similar characteristics, is unclear. As of early 2005 it appeared that the development of the Kh-101 had been suspended in favor of the Kh-555 program.

  • KH-555 is your average KH-55 but with a 500kg (1,000lbs) of conventional explosive, instead of 200kt nuclear warhead.

    A deep modernization X-55 with improved navigation, Russian sources claim that the range is increased to almost 5000 km.

  • Real name: KH-55 Granat (Nato reporting name is AS-15 Kent) weight 1,700kg, range 2,500km,

    Speed 600km/h - 920km/h;Guidance System: Inertial navigation element with terrain contour-matching system!!!

    KH-55SM is a longer reaching (3,000km)

    lighter (1,185kg), Guidance:inertial with Doppler radar/terrain map updates;SPEED 800km/h

  • the most powerful bomber and cruise missile

  • Please, Primorsky (bytheSeaman) tell us more about this missile: weight, war head weight, type of explosive, range, speed, fuels it uses?!! NATO reporting name is Kitchen or Raduga???

  • @Primorsky Bomber, maybe. Cruise missile, no.  The US AGM-129 ACM missile is stealthy, the KH-55 is not. Do to treaty regulations, the AGM-129 cannot be carried on the B2. In a shooting war, a B2 is going to be a lot more effective than something like a Tu-160 or B1 because it's much harder to track on radar.

  • @Primorsky hmm b2

  • sibelius333, spent a few minutes to google before saying bullshit. Putin really was onboard of one of Blackjacks in test flight to launch four Kh-555. It was of course a promo-event and satisfaction of someone's ego, but this don't affect the facts.

  • @74flateric what facts? :)

  • Very interesting vidio!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more