i remember back in 2011 i was confused on why everybody was so happy to hear that a man died, my parents did not tell me about things like this along w/ gang violence,drugs etc. my father told me how he had a cruise trip planned for him and my mother and some family and friends and how he got called into work while watching the news and how the trip was canceled,i just don't get why people do this and acknowledge this. wtf kind of world do we live in?
TOXIN in BRAIN is not like being """DRUGGED""" with Cocaine, Pain Killer etc
WALKING DEAD FILM is Making FUN of AMERICANS who drink FLUORIDE its "RAT POISON"C 30 Video and over 3000 Professionals & Dr Hirzy with 7000 EPA waring us at one site wwwFLUORIDEALERTorg,
C Neuro Surgeon Videos dr blaylock excitotoxins MSG its INSECT KILLER in Food, makes it taste GOOD=FAT PEOPLE, CANCER many Health Problems
British Scientist , You Americans are a CHEMICAL EXPERIMENT, Also C SSSS WAVES, TV A=WAVES
3:07 Notice the floors on fire(barely) were the same floors Barry Jennings said the stairway was blown out from under them. 6th floor. Bombs going off b4 the towers came down.Read below.
Funny how complete STAIRWELLS were BLOWN OUT on the 6th & 7th floor(inside the building) by falling debris & office fires. HAHAHAHAHAHA Just ask Barry Jennings,oh wait you can't-he died of a heart attack at 53.On September 11th, 2001, he saw and heard explosions BEFORE the Twin Towers fell, while attempting to evacuate the WTC 7 Command Center with NYC Corporation Counsel Michael Hess. Jennings publicly shared his experiences with a reporter on the day of 9/11/01
Funny how complete STAIRWELLS were BLOWN OUT on the 6th & 7th floor(inside the building) by falling debris & office fires. HAHAHAHAHAHA Just ask Barry Jennings,oh wait you can't-he died of a heart attack at 53.On September 11th, 2001, he saw and heard explosions BEFORE the Twin Towers fell, while attempting to evacuate the WTC 7 Command Center with NYC Corporation Counsel Michael Hess. Jennings publicly shared his experiences with a reporter on the day of 9/11/01
The flight controls were modified beforehand to be taken over remotely & as a backup there were transponders inside the WTC towers that were "painting the target". Neither the pilots nor the hijackers had control over the planes in the final minutes. The maneuvers in the final moments before impact were characteristic of military flight operations often used when guiding in Tomahawk cruise missiles. Research Project Avalon whistle blowers. Paul Wellstone's plane was rigged the same way.
at the end of clip reporter showing charred cars but behind him right across the street is the garage enterance is where Mr Hess is filmed on the 8th floor yelling out the broken window, and the demolition crew the first guy with the welding goggles on was un willingly caught on film and filmed!!! is the building with Mr Hess even part of wtc 7? 7 is another block further down with the controlled floors blown out. refer to man yelling from window video and compare. you can piece it together.
MrShazDude if you were a proud fucking American you would not of said 7people died with a XD face you fucking prick and just to let you know I'm a fucking veteran and proud to be an American
@Chowbizful It depends who you ask. The official account states that the fires were caused by the collapse of the twin towers, which did in fact cause some damage to one side of WTC7, but I couild not tell you how the fires made it from that side, to the other, without burning the side it originated on (according tot he official story, that is).
I beleive that and the straight lines of broken windows were the result of explosives.
The evidence supporting controlled demolition is abundant.
what i find strange with this clip is the buildings all have patterns of windows blown out almost as if something from the inside on that specific floor has blown them out where as the windows above and below are not damaged, any ideas ?? good video cheers for sharing
@dumbie999 I find that strange too. I personally think that these straight lines travelling horizontally across two stories, half way across the building, continuing the same straight line a few stories above to the other end of the building were most likely the result of explosives. Debunkers claim it, as well as the blown out windows in the first building, were a result of the twin towers collapse but that would not cause two straight lines as you noticed.
@99Eternal well, on that subject, there is a very simple scientific explanation for that, which I have seen explained in other disasters. Think of it as that row of windows was where an open office area was likely located, with no walls to prevent or redirect a pressure wave originating from the opposite side from forcing the windows out. Now, if there had been walls (like a standard office room) then it would have been less likely the windows would have broken as much as they did.
@renton9999 That is one of the largest generalizations I haver ever heard. Hardly worth responding to.
"with no walls to prevent or redirect a pressure wave originating from the opposite side from "
Except there were indeed walls in between the twin tower side of WTC7 and the side this was filmed from...herp derp. Anyone with eyes can see this quite clearly.
Scientific explanation? No. Far from it. There were walls, my son. Run along now.
@renton9999 "that's strange, I saw no evidence of interior walls on that floor in the video, do you have x-ray vision?"
The blueprints for WTC7 were released by NIST...this is why you should not troll topics which you do not comprehend.
Furthermore, let us say the interior walls were not there. There was no damage on the opposite side of the building anywhere near that altitude (where the official story claims the cource of the damage/fires was).
@99Eternal the only plans I have seen are the ones for 1 and 2, that are no original blueprints for the floors of 7 floating around. the prints I HAVE seen for WTC 7 don't give the full plan for each floor, but instead only focus on certain floors to detail points of failure, and even those are not complete. when you DO manage to find every floor blueprint that details the placement of every wall on each floor, be sure to let me know, conspiracy nut.
@renton9999 You conveniently ignored the latter portion of my statement which disproves your claims...regardless of the presence of interior walls. Idiot.
@99Eternal didn't ignore it, I know your theories cannot be proven without the proper evidence, which you still didn't provide a link to. you think for some reason that all the floors looked the exact same. have you even seen what an open office area looks like? there are few interior walls and not all office spaces have private offices along the windows. But I digress since you are hellbent on thinking there can't be other explanations and are stuck in conspiracy mode. Good day.
@renton9999 "you think for some reason that all the floors looked the exact same."
When did I say that?
"didn't ignore it"
You accuse me of being stuck in conspiracy mode when you are the one stating I've said things that I clearly have not, while continuing to ignore my point?
@renton9999 Bottom line: Damage from the opposite side of WTC7 cannot possibly cause two lines of windows, several stories above that damage, on the opposite side of the building to blow out, without damaging the stories that the source of the pressure originated. Those are the elementary laws of pressure you imbecile. That pressure also blow out all the windows on the building across the st on the opposite side of the where the official story states the origin of the pressure was.
The buildings are still standing but the cars are burnt the fuck up, this dont make no sense. What caused the cars to burn like that and the windows to be blown outward. Explosives had to be in those buildings.
To the friends of A&E.No university,research centers,technical journals,associations of engineers and architects believe the lies and the demolition of the"A&E".The same in Asia,Oceania,Canada,Europe and South America.The list below is today.I have the link of all. Always find more on the internet.There evidence against the towers and WTC7.Only 0.001% of U.S.engineers are in A&E.Without the universities the A&E will never convince the U.S. Congress to reopen anything.The A&E was born defected.
The most complete WTC attack video that has ever surfaced is an over two hour video from that day called: 'Tuesday Morning in September'. it is an experience like no other from that day. It is something that was never released .. until nine years after 9/11/2001. You can have a personal copy of the 130 minute chronicle on DVD. Something that the media never had.. something pure from that day that you will hold onto and share with generations to come....
I have heard several conspiracy theories, although none are as ridiculous as the US Government's "Official" conspiracy theory. A strange coincidence to all of this is that Hitler ordered a "false flag" attack on the German Parliament in order to justify the creation of the Gestapo to protect the people against "terrorism"; Gestapo is German for "Homeland Security Agency". The parallels are scary. I remember the end to this sequence of events.
5:16---Reporter: ""This must have been ground zero where "this thing" blew up""---I wonder how those cars were destroyed and how the low level fires in the surrounding buildings were started?
the same man owend all the buildings that collapsed that day he made a lot of money from it only in the usa can u make money from a building falling down.
@furdnan Silverstein (the owner you speak of) also conveniently altered his insurance policy shortly before 9/11 not only to include terrorist attacks, but even included a clause that effectively made the two plane crashes two separate attacks. I wonder why the insurance companies gave him a hard time? heheh. The official fairy tale - a joke really. The most blatant cover-up in history.
@99Eternal all of you who are aware, now I say to wake up, the masses (majority people on earth) are not capable of thinking for themselves or coming to reasonable conclusions. that is the problem. that is why the criminals in power know they can get away with anything. USA is run by war profiteers, child murdersers & pedoph!les. this you choose to ignore. flight 3407 crash 2009 on board Alison Des Forges who exposed rwanda genocide & Beverly Eckert, an activist started 9/11 independent commitee
Its amazing how the cars got burnt away so far away from the WTC7 !
Wish there were subtitles showing the names of the buildings..I know there is a post office on one side of WTC7 and verizon building on the other side which amazingly did not get damaged much.
@gutrp One possible reason the cars were burned "so far away from the WTC7" is the use of directed energy weapons, which Dr. Judy Woods says was "suggested" by other evidence.
3000 people in and around the towers died on 911. A pancake collapse would have allowed rescue workers to find all the bodies. They only found 1000 bodies. 300 were intact and 700 were in 4500 pieces. The other 2000= no trace. That is what one could expect with a massive explosion, vaporizing people. Mini nukes remain a valid theory .
Great video. It is easy to understand the big picture, but figuring out all the little details of a 911 is hard. The big picture is War Merchants create war. Spark a religious war and the profits are so great, they can't be counted. It took time before the JFK inisders talked.
That story is about 98% solved. 911 will be solved. Someone will talk because there were many who set it up. Someone will grow a conscious.
@Jim5769 "Because it couldn't possibly be that sections of the towers were springing away due to action from the steel acting as springs when they let go"
Steel doesn't spring when under load. EVER. NOT POSSIBLE. Thanks for demonstrating your complete lack of comprehension/education on this matter.
watch?v=I7oti6KGEf4&feature=channel_video_title
watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ
Educate yourself before attempting to troll. You only expose your lack of knowledge, thus embarrassing yourself.
@Raindarsus Again, nobody is denying the steel was weakened. Asymmetrical damage cannot result in symmetrical collapse at free-fall acceleration. This is impossible unless all columns are severed at the same time.
Most importantly, whether or not the steel was weakened, is irrelevant to this discussion, for weakened steel if not MOLTEN STEEL. Key word, MOLTEN, not weakened. You incredibly incompetent troll.
@99Eternal "Asymmetrical damage cannot result in symmetrical collapse at free-fall acceleration. This is impossible unless all columns are severed at the same time....for weakened steel if not MOLTEN STEEL. Key word, MOLTEN, not weakened..."
Collapse will occur according to however the structure eventually fails. WTC 7 did not fall symmetrically, nor was it at free-fall speed. Perhaps you should watch the videos with more of an eye for detail.
How do we know this is in Building 7? The guy says on camera that he has no clue where he is. Anyway, all the blown out windows are the result of the collapsing towers. Buildings all around the immediate area had windows blown out from the debris cloud. You can tell by the layers of dust debris in the video that at least one tower has already collapsed. Broken windows do not equate to a controlled demo as alluded to by 99Eternal.
@Jim5769 The mystery is thus: What caused such a fire to rage two blocks away from the towers. I spent a few minutes on Google Earth looking in disbelief at the complete destruction of the Barclay/Broadway and not coming to grips with what went on there.
@hicksrickygemini "The mystery is thus: What caused such a fire to rage two blocks away from the towers."
I have yet to see a timeline for when the fires in WTC 7 started. Before the towers collapsed, after they collapsed, etc. If after, given the severe structural damage to WTC 7 from the towers' collapse, it could have started from exposed electrical wiring. If before, the burning debris launched out and away from the towers upon impact of the planes might account for it.
@99Eternal "The WTC towers were not enclosed. Are you forgetting that a plane hit them gashing all 4 sides of the building?"
The fire was still contained within the building--holes to the outside or not. There were still floors, walls, and ceilings around most of the fire. "Open Air" means that it is completely exposed, like a campfire. The point is that the temp was higher than what your figures would indicate.
Those jet fuel temps are for OPEN AIR, not enclosed areas.
"...If heat is pumped into the steel faster than it can be conducted away, the temperature of the steel RISES ABOVE THE TEMPERATURE OF THE FIRE, eventually reaching the plastic deformation (softening) temperature...the steel girders deform, and the rest is purely momentum...The supporting girders did not need to melt (liquify) to cause the buildings to collapse, they just needed to soften enough to deform and start the collapse..."
Skyscrapers do not collapse DUE TO FIRE. Only 3 skyskrapers have collapsed because of fire. All on the same day. The two twin towers and building 7. It just doesn't make sense. Especially the way all three buildings collapsed. The empire state building would have had more chance of collapse when a plane crashed into it in 1945, than building seven did when no plane crashed into it. I still don't fully get why it when on fire even if the twin towers collapsed above it could someone expain to me:)
@MrGingerLightning "The empire state building would have had more chance of collapse when a plane crashed into it in 1945"
Wrong. First, the Empire State building was built completely differently, with a lot more reinforced concrete. Second, the propeller-driven bomber that hit it was much smaller and travelling much slower than the jetliners that hit the WTC.
As for why it fell? The falling towers knocked out a 20-story section of one corner of WTC 7, just for starters....
@Jim5769 Okay thank you :) You sound like you got a litttle attitude problem. How come people can't have normal conversations without having a cheeky argument... not that this has become one, yet.But the two towers were designed specifically to handle a plane crash maybe not those specific planes but still. The story still doesn't add up. Thanks for that I actually can't find much about the wtc 7 actually. Finding this video was quite difficult for me. Buildings don't fall like that though..:(
@MrGingerLightning "But the two towers were designed specifically to handle a plane crash maybe not those specific planes but still."
The towers were designed to handle an ACCIDENTAL strike from a smaller plane that would presumably be moving slower and trying to AVOID the towers. Not a deliberate ramming attack at high speed. Jeez. Ten years later and you still don't know anything except that you have questions...try learning the answers already!
@MrGingerLightning "Only 3 skyskrapers have collapsed because of fire. All on the same day."
The WTC buildings didn't collapse solely due to fire. They collapsed because of impact structural damages that the fire turned into catastrophic failures. The other fires which you're referencing were just that, normal fires. Those other buildings you're talking about didn't have jetliners slam into them or have massive chunks of 110 story buildings fall into them.
great evidence ,indeed possibly thermic reaction , the structure looks to stand solid ,why do people think this came down as some after shock is beyond me ? and yes the term blow up,, and just the right amount of media prior to getting the sheep on board before pulling it.........so to speak awake America your liberty is gone!!
This didn't give me proof,it reminded me of a movie set. Fire was burning floors,that never had caught fire. Also,the buildings outside window sills,were completey different.
@anarchist393 I remove spam, and blatant troll comments lacking factual corroboration of any sort. You upload a video and see how you feel when some troll drops 20+ comments stating it was caused by a nuclear detonation 80Km below the WTC complex, while refusing the provide a single peice of evidence to support his spam. One comment is fine but 20 repeating the same nonsense without any corroborating facts will be removed. Call it what you want, doesn't bother me any.
@99Eternal Funny how you can repeat the same old 'bollocks' without any evidence of your own. I didn't realise you were a part of the 9/11 commission. I think you should remove your postings as you are obviously a little bit unhinged.
@caxtonman "Funny how you can repeat the same old 'bollocks' without any evidence of your own."
This video is evidence. My entire channel is evidence. You ignore it.
One irrefutable example - iron rich micropsheres (ubiquitous to ALL known WTC dust samples, INCLUDING FEMA, USGS, and independents around the globe(RJ LEE, etc). EVERYONE has found them SAME thing.
Jet Fuel/steel max temperature - 599 degrees F
Steel melting point 2750 degrees F - it does not get any more obvious.
@caxtonman As I said, comments (like the one you just posted) containing only heresay and zero factual input will be removed. Do you really think you are going to make me feel guilty for doing so?
Back to the facts (which can be found on my 9/11 playlist if you were actually interested (I know you are just here to troll) - explain the presence of previously molten iron microspheres in all known wtc dust samples? Jet Fuel/Fires fall 2000 degrees F short of this melting point...
@caxtonman ** Jet Fuel/Office Fires max temp - 599 degrees F (i said jet fuel/steel by accident initially)
Steel melting point - 2750 degrees F
All known WTC dust samples contain previously molten iron rich microspheres. The only source for this amount of iron is the structural steel in the buildings. How was this steel melted from fires/jet fuel? It is impossible.
These microspheres just happen to be the bi-product of thermitic reactions. Pure coincidence, I am sure.
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Maybe if you bothered to explain, and not insult like some jackass debunker things would be simpler."
I told you, there are THOUSANDS OF HOURS of cumulative video that clearly shows the steel was not turned to dust as you claimed. It does not matter where the steel was sent, or if it was even recycled at all, UNDERSTAND?. The POINT is that it was not turned to dust as you claimed yet you refuse to admit you are incorrect.
"Yea, the undamaged basement does corroborate the Nuclear Demo suggestion."
No it does not. That is why after repeating this same thing several times, you have yet to provide a single example of how it corroborates your theory. There is not a single piece of evidence to support nuclear detonations. Not one. You have written 20 comments reinstating your support for this theory yet you cannot provide a single piece of evidence to support it.
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Or do i just transform into one when i say that there are things that cant be explained by thermite alone? "
You continue to state this and I continue to ask you to provide a single example of an event that cannot be explained by thermitic reactions alone, as opposed to your ridiculous 80KM deep nuclear detonation theory, which you also have yet to provide a single piece of evidence to support.
Further troll comments lacking facts will be removed.
@ThisPageStaysREAL "It takes an incredibly stupid,and arrogant individual to call somebody stupid whom they have never met or conversed with, and not having been insulted to warrant it. "
You should search the definition of "stupid". I do not require you to insult me in order to see that you are stupid. Stupid enough to say that they collapses were caused by nuclear detonations 80KM below the towers. You pathetic, laughable idiot.
The thousands of hours of video which clearly show that there is no 80KM deep cavity from your rediculous nuclear detonation theory.
This conversation is over. Not worth my time.
Nuclear Detonation and Directed Energy Weapon theories have been heavily refuted. Nobody has found radioactive elements in any dust samples. Yet in every dust sample there are micropsheres, the bi-product of thermitic reactions. DERP
Who the hell are you anyway, 99Eternal? You post a very interesting piece of footage, hence allowing people to comment on it, then you delete comments and argue with people who have a different point of view. Just like your government you are acting like a pathetic little prick who treats people like idiots. DELETE THAT YOU FUCKING NUMPTY!
all i know is from seeing buildings fall from structure damage, like in twister... the house will jerk around as each main beam is being weakend or destroyed.. not all at once. and all three buildings none of them shifted or slipped or swayed.
@smeganrocks87 And your intuition is exactly right, they were NOT natural collapses. But it also was NOT a nuclear detonation. That is disinformation, designed to discredit the serious researchers. If the mainstream can be fooled into thinking this is what happened, well it will be extremely easy to prove them incorrect.
PLEASE look at my 9/11 playlist. The evidence for controlled demolition using thermitic reactions is irrefutable. Directed Energy Weapons and Nuclear Detonation are DISINFO.
@ThisPageStaysREAL "same with mine, or marked as spam..I think the uploader is suggesting that the method in the description box is in fact the exact way 9/11 went down, Except for all the phenomenon that cant be explained by thermite? "
I am still waiting for you to provide a single example of a single phenomena that couldn't possibly be accomplished with thermitic reactions.
I havn't removed a single one of your comments, you fool. I don't control others marking them as spam. DERP.
@99Eternal Not explained by thermite. Cars 1/4 mile away fliped over on top of other cars, half burned cars/half undamaged, Massive reports of power outages in the area before the planes impacted, the pulverization of steel and marble, the paper and people not burned by thermite. The extreme temperatures "under ground zero" Ground Zero definition being a place directly above or below a nuclear detonation.. will links to these facts shut you up, or just anger you? I'm curious.
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Dr Wood earned my respect just for not getting trapped in the BS box of 911, what she brings up is mostly unknown to many here who have landed in the simple thermite vs official story debate."
Wood supports the Directed Energy Weapon theory, which next to nuclear demolition is the least likely hypothesis as it is the least corroborated and next to nuclear, the most heavily refuted as it does not fit all the evidence, only a small portion.
@99Eternal Do you know EVERY single event of 9/11 is consistant with the nuclear demolition theory? Do you even know what corroborated means? Or have you asked yourself why Dr. Jones and others in the thermite camp have not submitted anything they have into a legal proceeding? Why do they just sit and chat about it and take no action? Why is Judy Wood the only person to begin legal action against nist, Explain the earths documented magnetic spike at the exact moment of the impacts..hmm DERP?
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Do you know EVERY single event of 9/11 is consistant with the nuclear demolition theory?"
That is why you cannot name a single one, right?
"Do you even know what corroborated means?"
When a hypothesis is or is not fully supported by the available evidence. Considering you have yet to provide a single peice of evidence which supports your 80KM deep nuclear detonation theory, I wager that you are the one who is unaware of the meaning of the word corroborate.
@ThisPageStaysREAL "The number of GZ workers to die cant be explained by asbestos, as they all had cheap masks, but that doesnt stop radiation. ND is the only theory that can explain all."
Do you realize hw many public radiation monitoring stations there are in the USA? Do you realize how impossible it is to hide a nuclear detonation from the world? You demonstrate your lack of knowledge on nuclear each comment you make. Please do continue.
@99Eternal Do you know how many nuclear detonation and public radiation monitoring stations are under govt control? And do you know the difference between the gamma and x ray radiation emitted from an atmospheric and underground detonation? Have these thoughts even entered your mind? Or is it 24/7 non-stop thermite was EVERYWHERE and the cause of EVERYTHING, and still have not presented it as a legal matter? Since you're so very sure, whats holding the truth movement back?
@ThisPageStaysREAL You are a fool. There are monitoring networks made up of nothing but PUBLIC monitors, networks which anyone can participate in. Not to mentions the hundreds of COUNTRIES worldwide? Are they all under the control of the U.S government? Laughable.
You still have not mentioned a single phenomena that cannot be explained by thermitic reactions...remember that?
@ThisPageStaysREAL "The extreme heat months after 9/11 cant be explained by thermite,explosives,jet fuel or santa clause. "
Actually, they are easily explained by thermitic reactions. Did you know that the core of the Earth is molten? How does it maintain this? Because molten iron/steel, with it's extremely slow heat dissipation, will remain molten in a sealed environment such as a rubble pile, where the heat cannot escape. Nuclear demolition...laughable.
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Thermite can melt steel, but not pulverize it into fine dust.. And explosives cant pulverize steel either."
What evidence do you have that the steel was turned into dust? This isn't possible...
They built a warship out of the steel....the USS NY I believe? There are thousands of photos documenting structural steel, it most certainly wasn't all turned to dust, you fool.
@99Eternal i suppose youre very right. Me, i never did good in science classes, and if i did, it was so long ago. but seeing those cars reminded me of like the terminator. DAMN TECHNOLOGY for being able to exactly explain things. :P
Agreed. If you look at some of the film taken of WTC7 'collapsing' you will note that the penthouse section just sinks like a cake collapsing in the middle. It must have been some sort of powerful explosion that almost vaporised the inside of the building for that to happen. Your small nuclear device makes a lot of sense.
@caxtonman "It must have been some sort of powerful explosion that almost vaporised the inside of the building for that to happen. Your small nuclear device makes a lot of sense."
Why on Earth would a Nuclear detonation "make sense"? When you can accomplish the same result, with MUCH HIGHER ACCURACY using thermitic reactions?
Why did the hundreds of radiation monitoring stations not pick up these detonations? You idiot....look at my 9/11 playlist and stop the blatant , pathetic trolling.
@ThisPageStaysREAL "the only theory i support is the one that states the official story is a lie. I support the nuclear demo theory, and i do believe thermite was also used. I feel thermite was used in addition."
Then why did you mention Judy Wood (DEW theory) and suggest that people research her work?
Do you honestly beleive this was a combination of DEW, Nuclear and Thermitic? Why when everything is so easily explained by Thermitic alone, and there are so many holes in DEW and nuclear?
@ThisPageStaysREAL "The dust that building falls into cannot simply be explained by thermite alone, nor can the entire collapse be explained by Controlled Demolition."
What Characteristics are you speaking of that could not have resulted from a controlled demo using thermate of some type?
"And if i can ask, who exactly refutes both theories, and setting aside thermite what grounds were used to refute them?"
AE911TRUTH point out the holes in DEW. Nuclear holds no water to begin with.
@99Eternal Judy wood only presents the facts..nothing more. Its worth noting that 9/11 has become this tiny spectrum of the actual event. People find themselves on one side or another, of one particular aspect of that day, ie the collapse. Dr Wood earned my respect just for not getting trapped in the BS box of 911, what she brings up is mostly unknown to many here who have landed in the simple thermite vs official story debate. A puzzle cant be completed when pieces are missing.
@ThisPageStaysREAL Nuclear Demolition and Judy Wood's DEW theory are disinformation, both have been heavily refuted. I can mention one item that refutes both theories. Previously molten iron micropsheres found in ALL known WTC dust samples. This wouldn't be the case if it were a "kick-start" in a specifric area as you claim. Nor would we be seeing the molten steel fall from the impact zones....
How can you support two seperate theories in just two comments? Are you Newt Gingrich?
@ThisPageStaysREAL That would explain a lot. I don't think people realise that all the technology that we, the ordinary people, see is in fact 10 or 20 years behind what the 'powers that be' have in their possession - so it looks like to us an impossible reality. Please tell me more.
@caxtonman Ok, well there is a guy who is unknown to most ppl on both sides of this debate named Demitri Khalezov, he was an officer in some branch of Russia's military involved with nuclear munitions. He actually has quite a plausible explanation of 911, and lays it out quite directly. Upon hearing the idea of nuclear demolition, most people picture hiroshima and dismiss the notion. But after hearing this guy explain it, its clear he knows what he's talking about. /watch?v=eAV_BUQoGBw
@caxtonman You're right about the amount of secrecy that surrounds the govt, and what progress they have made in what fields. The public now is almost like a child that looks to the Govt for the explanation of all lifes events. Sadly the Govt likes it that way these days. Anyhow, you can search for other info, such as the work of Judy Wood, who has more credentials than needed, and is the one who sued Nist as in insider/whistleblower. She uses only facts,to ask questions. fliped burned cars etc
@ThisPageStaysREAL Thanks for the info, I will check it out. Did you hear the small explosions in the background at around 4 minutes in? From a building that was not targeted or hit directly? It's a shame that the de-bunkers can't view the obvious evidence with objectivity and scientific facts, which only serves to dishonour those poor people who perished for the sake of some twisted agenda.
@Lugare2011 Also if you look at the shots of building 7 you will notice that the actual frames are bent outwards, as if blown from the inside out. You would assume that the very nature of it's construction that the glass and frames were heavily engineered to withstand alot of pressure. And blown out all in a row on a couple of floors!
Manuel Garcia Jr, physicist and engineer, presents his three separate reports, undertaken for CounterPunch. Against the lies of the conspiracy from 2006
Part Three, "Dark Fire", is his report on the collapse of the World Trade Center’s Building 7:
An Initial Microstructural Analysis of A36 Steel from WTC Building 7
J.R. Barnett, R.R. Biederman, and R.D. Sisson, Jr.
J.R. Barnett is a professor of fire protection engineering, and R.R. Biederman and R.D. Sisson, Jr. are professors of materials science and engineering, at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609.
w w w . tms . org /pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Biederman/Biederman-0112.html
@aczjbr "Many of you have not heard of metallography. It is an engineering science. Only those who know the area is. It proves that the temperature in the towers and WTC7 came to +1800°F "
Exactly, and Jet Fuel and Office Fires max at 599°F. Look it up. Incredibly stupid person.
BTW, A&E features several metallurgical analysts. You realize that you are saying that these people have never heard of a trade which they have been experts in for decades?? HAHA. Are you inbred?
@99Eternal I still have universities of France, Australia, Canada, UK, Germany, Austria, Brazil, Singapore, Hong Kong and China to censor you. All against you and your conspiracy. It's a lot of people to blame. Where did you learn to be a false Athenian?
@aczjbr Try refuting my claims instead of claiming you have a host of universities to "censor me". Something tells me you do not know the meaning of censorship, why would a university censor me? Because i am right and they cannot refute it so they must try to evade it??
You yourself said the temps reached 1800degrees F. Jet Fuels and Fires max at 599 degrees F. Where did the extra 2000 degrees f come from than?? YOU SAID IT FOOL, NOT ME! YOU PROVED YOURSELF INCORRECT, AND I LOVE IT!
@99Eternal As I understand it you are referring to the fuel and its maximum temperature. Ai even if you're not an engineer. That was the ignition. The thermal reserve of the steel structure raised the temperature of the fire. You've never been in a metal frame construction? Further without the fire system. You should study. Mr. George Vandervoort is superior to you. And it makes you understand?
@aczjbr Steel cannot reach higher temperatures than it's source. You are confusing a theory with reality. Yes, an environment with red hot steel will keep fires at/near their max potential temperature of 599 degrees F, but it can and will not exceed the temperature of it's source, LET ALONE 2,000 DEGREES F ABOVE IT"S SOURCE, steel cannot do this, you IDIOT!
@aczjbr Could not have been the result of a single column failure. A single column failure cannot possibly result in global symmetrical collapse, at free-fall acceleration for the first 8 stories of collapse (this can only occur if ALL resistance has been removed, not a SINGLE COLUMN). You fool.
watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&feature=channel_video_title
Educate yourself before spamming my videos with nonsense.
Ronald Hamburger, a structural engineer and Senior Principal at Simpson Gumpertz and Heger consulting engineers in San Francisco, will discuss why those buildings collapsed and illustrate his talk with graphics. He was a principal author of FEMA's initial report on the collapse of the twin towers and later a key participant in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) study.
h t t p : / / 911research.wtc7.net/essays/green/hamburger.html
Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, Ph.D., P.E., Professor of Structural Egineering, Berkeley. Consultant on Design, Failure Analysis and Protection of Buildings and Bridges against Terrist Attacks
Civil & Structural Engineers on WTC7 Collapse
h t t p : / / 911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/astaneh-wtc.htm
Three trade associations representing the U.S. engineers. All against al Qaeda and purchased by the CIA?
Structure Magazine - A Join Publication of NCSEA / CASE / SEI
National Council of Structural Engineers Associations, American Council Of Engineering Companies & Structural Engineering Institute.How the Loss of One Column May Have Led to the Collapse of WTC 7 - Ramon Gilsanz, PE, SE, Willa Ng
w w w . structuremag . org / article . aspx?articleID = 284
From the sound of the footfalls when walking outside, the glass from that building was blown out rather than in. Didn't see glass on the ground when he filmed the inside.
@66eccles Sorry. Meant to say inside. I don't really hear a difference between the two is what i am trying to get at though. Then again, I think I have hearing loss.
The analysis of the explosives expert Jowenko was used by conspiracy theorists to show that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished. In the same interview, he explains that the controlled demolition of the twin towers is impossible. Dynamite would have exploded right away, and it would have taken a year to put everything in place. in English.
w w w . dailymotion. com / video/x2l5k9 _ effondrement-des-tours-jumelles_ news
EUROPE DIRECT. Demonstrating that all sciences are the conspiracy against the disease.
Je m'appelle Claude Valette. Je suis un physicien (supraconductivité, puis acoustique musicale, puis astrophysique), retraité, anciennement Directeur de Recherche au CNRS.
WTC physique rumeur - Physique de l’effondrement des tours du World Trade Center, WTC2, WTC1, WTC7, analyse de la rumeur, 50 pages en pdf par Claude Valette.
Please go to link and be aware that no engineering college in the USA, Canada, Europe, China, Brazil and Australia accepts the conspiracy theory unhealthy. much less in WTC7. There is evidence against this demolition jet.
Structure Magazine - A Join Publication of NCSEA / CASE / SEI
How the Loss of One Column May Have Led to the Collapse of WTC 7 - Ramon Gilsanz, PE, SE, Willa Ng
w w w . structuremag . org / article . aspx?articleID = 284
As a film director, my immediate question is, where are the bodies in the burned out cars in the final third of this video? This entire event looks as staged as a Universal Studios backlot picture. The park positions of the vehicles are unnatural and absolutely 100% staged. This was a production. I make them. I recognize them. I don't care what ANYONE says to deny that.
if you have never been to war like ive never been to werer
Buckeye43207 1 week ago
Notice that except for a small section the fires are almost completely out.
fakeyf9 2 weeks ago
i remember back in 2011 i was confused on why everybody was so happy to hear that a man died, my parents did not tell me about things like this along w/ gang violence,drugs etc. my father told me how he had a cruise trip planned for him and my mother and some family and friends and how he got called into work while watching the news and how the trip was canceled,i just don't get why people do this and acknowledge this. wtf kind of world do we live in?
yusukekillstoguro 2 weeks ago
May I point out the MAFIA was once a conspiracy.. spot using that word in such a negative subtext.
Daveycr 2 weeks ago
Looks like a bomb went off...
todzilla73 2 weeks ago
@todzilla73 That's because it did...
LeavingOnAJetPlanex 2 weeks ago
if u listen closely at 1:45 there is a explosion
reynoldsburgboy 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TOXIN in BRAIN is not like being """DRUGGED""" with Cocaine, Pain Killer etc
WALKING DEAD FILM is Making FUN of AMERICANS who drink FLUORIDE its "RAT POISON"C 30 Video and over 3000 Professionals & Dr Hirzy with 7000 EPA waring us at one site wwwFLUORIDEALERTorg,
C Neuro Surgeon Videos dr blaylock excitotoxins MSG its INSECT KILLER in Food, makes it taste GOOD=FAT PEOPLE, CANCER many Health Problems
British Scientist , You Americans are a CHEMICAL EXPERIMENT, Also C SSSS WAVES, TV A=WAVES
deadadelta 3 weeks ago
3:07 Notice the floors on fire(barely) were the same floors Barry Jennings said the stairway was blown out from under them. 6th floor. Bombs going off b4 the towers came down.Read below.
ed11561 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Funny how complete STAIRWELLS were BLOWN OUT on the 6th & 7th floor(inside the building) by falling debris & office fires. HAHAHAHAHAHA Just ask Barry Jennings,oh wait you can't-he died of a heart attack at 53.On September 11th, 2001, he saw and heard explosions BEFORE the Twin Towers fell, while attempting to evacuate the WTC 7 Command Center with NYC Corporation Counsel Michael Hess. Jennings publicly shared his experiences with a reporter on the day of 9/11/01
jenningsmystery . com/
ed11561 3 weeks ago
Funny how complete STAIRWELLS were BLOWN OUT on the 6th & 7th floor(inside the building) by falling debris & office fires. HAHAHAHAHAHA Just ask Barry Jennings,oh wait you can't-he died of a heart attack at 53.On September 11th, 2001, he saw and heard explosions BEFORE the Twin Towers fell, while attempting to evacuate the WTC 7 Command Center with NYC Corporation Counsel Michael Hess. Jennings publicly shared his experiences with a reporter on the day of 9/11/01
jenningsmystery . com/
ed11561 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The flight controls were modified beforehand to be taken over remotely & as a backup there were transponders inside the WTC towers that were "painting the target". Neither the pilots nor the hijackers had control over the planes in the final minutes. The maneuvers in the final moments before impact were characteristic of military flight operations often used when guiding in Tomahawk cruise missiles. Research Project Avalon whistle blowers. Paul Wellstone's plane was rigged the same way.
altgeldrarities 1 month ago
at the end of clip reporter showing charred cars but behind him right across the street is the garage enterance is where Mr Hess is filmed on the 8th floor yelling out the broken window, and the demolition crew the first guy with the welding goggles on was un willingly caught on film and filmed!!! is the building with Mr Hess even part of wtc 7? 7 is another block further down with the controlled floors blown out. refer to man yelling from window video and compare. you can piece it together.
Ochibason 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Windows blow out from fire. The levels that were on fire had blown out windows. Simple enough. Notice at 2:58 the windows are breaking from heat.
Msteinebach92 1 month ago
Comment removed
Msteinebach92 1 month ago
MrShazDude if you were a proud fucking American you would not of said 7people died with a XD face you fucking prick and just to let you know I'm a fucking veteran and proud to be an American
elibad11 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
7 people died in the 9/11 terrorist attack XD
MrShazDude 1 month ago
I'm french and I can tell you I've never seen any picture like this in my fucking life ...
Chowbizful 1 month ago
can somebody tell me why 7WTC was burning ?
Chowbizful 1 month ago
@Chowbizful It depends who you ask. The official account states that the fires were caused by the collapse of the twin towers, which did in fact cause some damage to one side of WTC7, but I couild not tell you how the fires made it from that side, to the other, without burning the side it originated on (according tot he official story, that is).
I beleive that and the straight lines of broken windows were the result of explosives.
The evidence supporting controlled demolition is abundant.
99Eternal 1 month ago 2
@Chowbizful BOMBS just like all the other towers-controlled demolition
ed11561 3 weeks ago
what i find strange with this clip is the buildings all have patterns of windows blown out almost as if something from the inside on that specific floor has blown them out where as the windows above and below are not damaged, any ideas ?? good video cheers for sharing
dumbie999 1 month ago
@dumbie999 I find that strange too. I personally think that these straight lines travelling horizontally across two stories, half way across the building, continuing the same straight line a few stories above to the other end of the building were most likely the result of explosives. Debunkers claim it, as well as the blown out windows in the first building, were a result of the twin towers collapse but that would not cause two straight lines as you noticed.
Thanks for commenting.
99Eternal 1 month ago
@99Eternal well, on that subject, there is a very simple scientific explanation for that, which I have seen explained in other disasters. Think of it as that row of windows was where an open office area was likely located, with no walls to prevent or redirect a pressure wave originating from the opposite side from forcing the windows out. Now, if there had been walls (like a standard office room) then it would have been less likely the windows would have broken as much as they did.
renton9999 3 weeks ago
@renton9999 That is one of the largest generalizations I haver ever heard. Hardly worth responding to.
"with no walls to prevent or redirect a pressure wave originating from the opposite side from "
Except there were indeed walls in between the twin tower side of WTC7 and the side this was filmed from...herp derp. Anyone with eyes can see this quite clearly.
Scientific explanation? No. Far from it. There were walls, my son. Run along now.
99Eternal 3 weeks ago
@99Eternal that's strange, I saw no evidence of interior walls on that floor in the video, do you have x-ray vision?
renton9999 3 weeks ago
@renton9999 "that's strange, I saw no evidence of interior walls on that floor in the video, do you have x-ray vision?"
The blueprints for WTC7 were released by NIST...this is why you should not troll topics which you do not comprehend.
Furthermore, let us say the interior walls were not there. There was no damage on the opposite side of the building anywhere near that altitude (where the official story claims the cource of the damage/fires was).
Nice try.
99Eternal 3 weeks ago
@99Eternal the only plans I have seen are the ones for 1 and 2, that are no original blueprints for the floors of 7 floating around. the prints I HAVE seen for WTC 7 don't give the full plan for each floor, but instead only focus on certain floors to detail points of failure, and even those are not complete. when you DO manage to find every floor blueprint that details the placement of every wall on each floor, be sure to let me know, conspiracy nut.
renton9999 3 weeks ago
@renton9999 You conveniently ignored the latter portion of my statement which disproves your claims...regardless of the presence of interior walls. Idiot.
99Eternal 3 weeks ago
@99Eternal didn't ignore it, I know your theories cannot be proven without the proper evidence, which you still didn't provide a link to. you think for some reason that all the floors looked the exact same. have you even seen what an open office area looks like? there are few interior walls and not all office spaces have private offices along the windows. But I digress since you are hellbent on thinking there can't be other explanations and are stuck in conspiracy mode. Good day.
renton9999 3 weeks ago
@renton9999 btw, as to your damage argument, look up pressure waves on wikipedia.
renton9999 3 weeks ago
@renton9999 "you think for some reason that all the floors looked the exact same."
When did I say that?
"didn't ignore it"
You accuse me of being stuck in conspiracy mode when you are the one stating I've said things that I clearly have not, while continuing to ignore my point?
99Eternal 3 weeks ago
@renton9999 Bottom line: Damage from the opposite side of WTC7 cannot possibly cause two lines of windows, several stories above that damage, on the opposite side of the building to blow out, without damaging the stories that the source of the pressure originated. Those are the elementary laws of pressure you imbecile. That pressure also blow out all the windows on the building across the st on the opposite side of the where the official story states the origin of the pressure was.
99Eternal 3 weeks ago
So the building then went into FREE FALL SPEED COLLAPSE?
maplespak 1 month ago
The buildings are still standing but the cars are burnt the fuck up, this dont make no sense. What caused the cars to burn like that and the windows to be blown outward. Explosives had to be in those buildings.
Brianw11830 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To the friends of A&E.No university,research centers,technical journals,associations of engineers and architects believe the lies and the demolition of the"A&E".The same in Asia,Oceania,Canada,Europe and South America.The list below is today.I have the link of all. Always find more on the internet.There evidence against the towers and WTC7.Only 0.001% of U.S.engineers are in A&E.Without the universities the A&E will never convince the U.S. Congress to reopen anything.The A&E was born defected.
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Implosionworld . com
American Institute of Steel Construction Inc, Chicago (AISC),
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 123,000 members
American Institute of Architects (AIA), 80,000 members
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), --
American Concrete Institute (ACI),
American Council Of Engineering Companies (ACEC),
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 120,000 members
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA), 35,000 members
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE), 40,000members
American Standards Institute (ANSI)
Department of Design and Construction (DDC) in NY,
Institute of Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY),
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 370,000 members
National Council of Structural Engineers Associations (NCSEA),
National Fire Protection Association (NFPA),
Structural Engineering Institute (SEI),
aczjbr 1 month ago
Society for Fire Protection Engineering (SFPE),
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Engineering Department,
Northwestern University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Engineering Department,
University of California, Engineering Department,
National Academy of Engineering,
University of Pennsylvania, Engineering Department,
University of Maryland, Department of Fire Protection Engineering,
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Stanford University, Engineering Department,
Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, Engineering Department,
State University of New York at Buffalo, Engineering Department,
University of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Natural and Applied Sciences,
University of Perdue, School of Civil Engineering,
University of Arizona, Engineering Department,
University of Colorado, Engineering Department,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
aczjbr 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
University of Akron, Department of Mechanical Engineering
Michigan State University, Engineering Department
University of Texas at El Paso, Department of Computer Science & Department of Public Administration
University of Delaware, Department of Sociology & Criminal Justice
Cornell University, Department of Engineering
Washington State University; Department of Political Science and Criminal Justice
University of Louisville, Department of Urban and Public Affairs
aczjbr 1 month ago
A can of fuel can knock a whole building down, it worked 3 times on 9/11 lol
giptonsilly 1 month ago
So US planes have lake size jet fuel <.<
Blue2Volf 2 months ago
what's behind him? WHAT!? TELL MEE!
Mave0Rick 2 months ago 4
@Mave0Rick walter joo talkin about?
99Eternal 2 months ago
@99Eternal at the end of the video hes says Behind Me... en then it stops.
Mave0Rick 1 month ago
2:03 thats my car :(
makeitbe1 2 months ago
@makeitbe1 really? :/
IamCruddy 2 months ago
Yeah, Jet Fuel Did ALL THIS! FFSFTW
intermatrixnaut1 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The most complete WTC attack video that has ever surfaced is an over two hour video from that day called: 'Tuesday Morning in September'. it is an experience like no other from that day. It is something that was never released .. until nine years after 9/11/2001. You can have a personal copy of the 130 minute chronicle on DVD. Something that the media never had.. something pure from that day that you will hold onto and share with generations to come....
Supersynapsis 2 months ago
Why does he keep talking about war? Reminds me of Jeraldo. I am so annoyed by television reporters ><
JoyousinJesus 2 months ago
I have heard several conspiracy theories, although none are as ridiculous as the US Government's "Official" conspiracy theory. A strange coincidence to all of this is that Hitler ordered a "false flag" attack on the German Parliament in order to justify the creation of the Gestapo to protect the people against "terrorism"; Gestapo is German for "Homeland Security Agency". The parallels are scary. I remember the end to this sequence of events.
fixitjEarth 2 months ago
5:16---Reporter: ""This must have been ground zero where "this thing" blew up""---I wonder how those cars were destroyed and how the low level fires in the surrounding buildings were started?
billy38010 2 months ago
the same man owend all the buildings that collapsed that day he made a lot of money from it only in the usa can u make money from a building falling down.
furdnan 2 months ago
@furdnan Silverstein (the owner you speak of) also conveniently altered his insurance policy shortly before 9/11 not only to include terrorist attacks, but even included a clause that effectively made the two plane crashes two separate attacks. I wonder why the insurance companies gave him a hard time? heheh. The official fairy tale - a joke really. The most blatant cover-up in history.
99Eternal 2 months ago 19
@99Eternal all of you who are aware, now I say to wake up, the masses (majority people on earth) are not capable of thinking for themselves or coming to reasonable conclusions. that is the problem. that is why the criminals in power know they can get away with anything. USA is run by war profiteers, child murdersers & pedoph!les. this you choose to ignore. flight 3407 crash 2009 on board Alison Des Forges who exposed rwanda genocide & Beverly Eckert, an activist started 9/11 independent commitee
smokesignal216 1 day ago
wow this is a great video..
Its amazing how the cars got burnt away so far away from the WTC7 !
Wish there were subtitles showing the names of the buildings..I know there is a post office on one side of WTC7 and verizon building on the other side which amazingly did not get damaged much.
good vid
gutrp 2 months ago
@gutrp "Wish there were subtitles showing the names of the buildings.."
Great idea will try to get on that after the Holidays. Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays!
99Eternal 2 months ago
@gutrp One possible reason the cars were burned "so far away from the WTC7" is the use of directed energy weapons, which Dr. Judy Woods says was "suggested" by other evidence.
Craziejane69 1 month ago
fun thing to do:
watch 9/11 videos
turn on the youtube snowing effect
000gamefreak 2 months ago
3000 people in and around the towers died on 911. A pancake collapse would have allowed rescue workers to find all the bodies. They only found 1000 bodies. 300 were intact and 700 were in 4500 pieces. The other 2000= no trace. That is what one could expect with a massive explosion, vaporizing people. Mini nukes remain a valid theory .
390bullitt1968 2 months ago
Great video. It is easy to understand the big picture, but figuring out all the little details of a 911 is hard. The big picture is War Merchants create war. Spark a religious war and the profits are so great, they can't be counted. It took time before the JFK inisders talked.
That story is about 98% solved. 911 will be solved. Someone will talk because there were many who set it up. Someone will grow a conscious.
390bullitt1968 2 months ago
@Jim5769 "Because it couldn't possibly be that sections of the towers were springing away due to action from the steel acting as springs when they let go"
Steel doesn't spring when under load. EVER. NOT POSSIBLE. Thanks for demonstrating your complete lack of comprehension/education on this matter.
watch?v=I7oti6KGEf4&feature=channel_video_title
watch?v=lw-jzCfa4eQ
Educate yourself before attempting to troll. You only expose your lack of knowledge, thus embarrassing yourself.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@99Eternal
and the sky isn't blue, the sun doesn't shine, and the moon is made of green cheese.
Jim5769 2 months ago
@Raindarsus Again, nobody is denying the steel was weakened. Asymmetrical damage cannot result in symmetrical collapse at free-fall acceleration. This is impossible unless all columns are severed at the same time.
Most importantly, whether or not the steel was weakened, is irrelevant to this discussion, for weakened steel if not MOLTEN STEEL. Key word, MOLTEN, not weakened. You incredibly incompetent troll.
99Eternal 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@99Eternal "Asymmetrical damage cannot result in symmetrical collapse at free-fall acceleration. This is impossible unless all columns are severed at the same time....for weakened steel if not MOLTEN STEEL. Key word, MOLTEN, not weakened..."
Collapse will occur according to however the structure eventually fails. WTC 7 did not fall symmetrically, nor was it at free-fall speed. Perhaps you should watch the videos with more of an eye for detail.
Why are you obsessed with MOLTEN?
Jim5769 2 months ago
my mom was there on 9/9/01 they would have wenton 911 but i had a doctors apponment nd she didnt go nethier my father.
Joshua22101 2 months ago
@Joshua22101 but she would have been okay even if she did go in though? that is eerie though.
MrGingerLightning 2 months ago
How do we know this is in Building 7? The guy says on camera that he has no clue where he is. Anyway, all the blown out windows are the result of the collapsing towers. Buildings all around the immediate area had windows blown out from the debris cloud. You can tell by the layers of dust debris in the video that at least one tower has already collapsed. Broken windows do not equate to a controlled demo as alluded to by 99Eternal.
Jim5769 2 months ago
@Jim5769 "How do we know this is in Building 7?"
The footage is not from inside WTC7.......it is across the street. My god man, read the description.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@Jim5769 Fucken r-tard
PSNmrclean 2 months ago
@Jim5769 The mystery is thus: What caused such a fire to rage two blocks away from the towers. I spent a few minutes on Google Earth looking in disbelief at the complete destruction of the Barclay/Broadway and not coming to grips with what went on there.
hicksrickygemini 2 months ago
@hicksrickygemini "The mystery is thus: What caused such a fire to rage two blocks away from the towers."
I have yet to see a timeline for when the fires in WTC 7 started. Before the towers collapsed, after they collapsed, etc. If after, given the severe structural damage to WTC 7 from the towers' collapse, it could have started from exposed electrical wiring. If before, the burning debris launched out and away from the towers upon impact of the planes might account for it.
Jim5769 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@99Eternal "The WTC towers were not enclosed. Are you forgetting that a plane hit them gashing all 4 sides of the building?"
The fire was still contained within the building--holes to the outside or not. There were still floors, walls, and ceilings around most of the fire. "Open Air" means that it is completely exposed, like a campfire. The point is that the temp was higher than what your figures would indicate.
Jim5769 2 months ago
@Jim5769 if the steel of the car melted like you said, then that wasn't steel. Next....
NinjaAntx 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NinjaAntx "if the steel of the car melted like you said, then that wasn't steel."
Obviously you haven't seen the results of many car fires.
Jim5769 2 months ago
Those jet fuel temps are for OPEN AIR, not enclosed areas.
"...If heat is pumped into the steel faster than it can be conducted away, the temperature of the steel RISES ABOVE THE TEMPERATURE OF THE FIRE, eventually reaching the plastic deformation (softening) temperature...the steel girders deform, and the rest is purely momentum...The supporting girders did not need to melt (liquify) to cause the buildings to collapse, they just needed to soften enough to deform and start the collapse..."
Jim5769 2 months ago
bush is bastrd, a cruel satanic b a s t a r d!
AMERSIDD 2 months ago
bush is , a cruel satanic
AMERSIDD 2 months ago
Skyscrapers do not collapse DUE TO FIRE. Only 3 skyskrapers have collapsed because of fire. All on the same day. The two twin towers and building 7. It just doesn't make sense. Especially the way all three buildings collapsed. The empire state building would have had more chance of collapse when a plane crashed into it in 1945, than building seven did when no plane crashed into it. I still don't fully get why it when on fire even if the twin towers collapsed above it could someone expain to me:)
MrGingerLightning 2 months ago
@MrGingerLightning "The empire state building would have had more chance of collapse when a plane crashed into it in 1945"
Wrong. First, the Empire State building was built completely differently, with a lot more reinforced concrete. Second, the propeller-driven bomber that hit it was much smaller and travelling much slower than the jetliners that hit the WTC.
As for why it fell? The falling towers knocked out a 20-story section of one corner of WTC 7, just for starters....
Jim5769 2 months ago
@Jim5769 Okay thank you :) You sound like you got a litttle attitude problem. How come people can't have normal conversations without having a cheeky argument... not that this has become one, yet.But the two towers were designed specifically to handle a plane crash maybe not those specific planes but still. The story still doesn't add up. Thanks for that I actually can't find much about the wtc 7 actually. Finding this video was quite difficult for me. Buildings don't fall like that though..:(
MrGingerLightning 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrGingerLightning "But the two towers were designed specifically to handle a plane crash maybe not those specific planes but still."
The towers were designed to handle an ACCIDENTAL strike from a smaller plane that would presumably be moving slower and trying to AVOID the towers. Not a deliberate ramming attack at high speed. Jeez. Ten years later and you still don't know anything except that you have questions...try learning the answers already!
Jim5769 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrGingerLightning "Only 3 skyskrapers have collapsed because of fire. All on the same day."
The WTC buildings didn't collapse solely due to fire. They collapsed because of impact structural damages that the fire turned into catastrophic failures. The other fires which you're referencing were just that, normal fires. Those other buildings you're talking about didn't have jetliners slam into them or have massive chunks of 110 story buildings fall into them.
Jim5769 2 months ago
great evidence ,indeed possibly thermic reaction , the structure looks to stand solid ,why do people think this came down as some after shock is beyond me ? and yes the term blow up,, and just the right amount of media prior to getting the sheep on board before pulling it.........so to speak awake America your liberty is gone!!
matjinthol 2 months ago
This didn't give me proof,it reminded me of a movie set. Fire was burning floors,that never had caught fire. Also,the buildings outside window sills,were completey different.
jigreelo 2 months ago
shouldn't this have a million views?
burnout623 2 months ago
2:19 It looks like an alien is observing beside the building to the right,
sshaddoww 2 months ago
99Eternal why do you delete so many peoples comments i bet this will be deleted just for saying this
anarchist393 2 months ago
@anarchist393 I remove spam, and blatant troll comments lacking factual corroboration of any sort. You upload a video and see how you feel when some troll drops 20+ comments stating it was caused by a nuclear detonation 80Km below the WTC complex, while refusing the provide a single peice of evidence to support his spam. One comment is fine but 20 repeating the same nonsense without any corroborating facts will be removed. Call it what you want, doesn't bother me any.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@99Eternal Funny how you can repeat the same old 'bollocks' without any evidence of your own. I didn't realise you were a part of the 9/11 commission. I think you should remove your postings as you are obviously a little bit unhinged.
caxtonman 2 months ago
@caxtonman "Funny how you can repeat the same old 'bollocks' without any evidence of your own."
This video is evidence. My entire channel is evidence. You ignore it.
One irrefutable example - iron rich micropsheres (ubiquitous to ALL known WTC dust samples, INCLUDING FEMA, USGS, and independents around the globe(RJ LEE, etc). EVERYONE has found them SAME thing.
Jet Fuel/steel max temperature - 599 degrees F
Steel melting point 2750 degrees F - it does not get any more obvious.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@caxtonman As I said, comments (like the one you just posted) containing only heresay and zero factual input will be removed. Do you really think you are going to make me feel guilty for doing so?
Back to the facts (which can be found on my 9/11 playlist if you were actually interested (I know you are just here to troll) - explain the presence of previously molten iron microspheres in all known wtc dust samples? Jet Fuel/Fires fall 2000 degrees F short of this melting point...
99Eternal 2 months ago
@caxtonman ** Jet Fuel/Office Fires max temp - 599 degrees F (i said jet fuel/steel by accident initially)
Steel melting point - 2750 degrees F
All known WTC dust samples contain previously molten iron rich microspheres. The only source for this amount of iron is the structural steel in the buildings. How was this steel melted from fires/jet fuel? It is impossible.
These microspheres just happen to be the bi-product of thermitic reactions. Pure coincidence, I am sure.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Maybe if you bothered to explain, and not insult like some jackass debunker things would be simpler."
I told you, there are THOUSANDS OF HOURS of cumulative video that clearly shows the steel was not turned to dust as you claimed. It does not matter where the steel was sent, or if it was even recycled at all, UNDERSTAND?. The POINT is that it was not turned to dust as you claimed yet you refuse to admit you are incorrect.
You really are an incredibly stupid individual.
99Eternal 2 months ago
"Yea, the undamaged basement does corroborate the Nuclear Demo suggestion."
No it does not. That is why after repeating this same thing several times, you have yet to provide a single example of how it corroborates your theory. There is not a single piece of evidence to support nuclear detonations. Not one. You have written 20 comments reinstating your support for this theory yet you cannot provide a single piece of evidence to support it.
Pathetic.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Or do i just transform into one when i say that there are things that cant be explained by thermite alone? "
You continue to state this and I continue to ask you to provide a single example of an event that cannot be explained by thermitic reactions alone, as opposed to your ridiculous 80KM deep nuclear detonation theory, which you also have yet to provide a single piece of evidence to support.
Further troll comments lacking facts will be removed.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "It takes an incredibly stupid,and arrogant individual to call somebody stupid whom they have never met or conversed with, and not having been insulted to warrant it. "
You should search the definition of "stupid". I do not require you to insult me in order to see that you are stupid. Stupid enough to say that they collapses were caused by nuclear detonations 80KM below the towers. You pathetic, laughable idiot.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "who said it disappeared?"
The thousands of hours of video which clearly show that there is no 80KM deep cavity from your rediculous nuclear detonation theory.
This conversation is over. Not worth my time.
Nuclear Detonation and Directed Energy Weapon theories have been heavily refuted. Nobody has found radioactive elements in any dust samples. Yet in every dust sample there are micropsheres, the bi-product of thermitic reactions. DERP
99Eternal 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Who the hell are you anyway, 99Eternal? You post a very interesting piece of footage, hence allowing people to comment on it, then you delete comments and argue with people who have a different point of view. Just like your government you are acting like a pathetic little prick who treats people like idiots. DELETE THAT YOU FUCKING NUMPTY!
caxtonman 2 months ago
all i know is from seeing buildings fall from structure damage, like in twister... the house will jerk around as each main beam is being weakend or destroyed.. not all at once. and all three buildings none of them shifted or slipped or swayed.
smeganrocks87 2 months ago
@smeganrocks87 And your intuition is exactly right, they were NOT natural collapses. But it also was NOT a nuclear detonation. That is disinformation, designed to discredit the serious researchers. If the mainstream can be fooled into thinking this is what happened, well it will be extremely easy to prove them incorrect.
PLEASE look at my 9/11 playlist. The evidence for controlled demolition using thermitic reactions is irrefutable. Directed Energy Weapons and Nuclear Detonation are DISINFO.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "same with mine, or marked as spam..I think the uploader is suggesting that the method in the description box is in fact the exact way 9/11 went down, Except for all the phenomenon that cant be explained by thermite? "
I am still waiting for you to provide a single example of a single phenomena that couldn't possibly be accomplished with thermitic reactions.
I havn't removed a single one of your comments, you fool. I don't control others marking them as spam. DERP.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@99Eternal Not explained by thermite. Cars 1/4 mile away fliped over on top of other cars, half burned cars/half undamaged, Massive reports of power outages in the area before the planes impacted, the pulverization of steel and marble, the paper and people not burned by thermite. The extreme temperatures "under ground zero" Ground Zero definition being a place directly above or below a nuclear detonation.. will links to these facts shut you up, or just anger you? I'm curious.
ThisPageStaysREAL 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Dr Wood earned my respect just for not getting trapped in the BS box of 911, what she brings up is mostly unknown to many here who have landed in the simple thermite vs official story debate."
Wood supports the Directed Energy Weapon theory, which next to nuclear demolition is the least likely hypothesis as it is the least corroborated and next to nuclear, the most heavily refuted as it does not fit all the evidence, only a small portion.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@99Eternal Do you know EVERY single event of 9/11 is consistant with the nuclear demolition theory? Do you even know what corroborated means? Or have you asked yourself why Dr. Jones and others in the thermite camp have not submitted anything they have into a legal proceeding? Why do they just sit and chat about it and take no action? Why is Judy Wood the only person to begin legal action against nist, Explain the earths documented magnetic spike at the exact moment of the impacts..hmm DERP?
ThisPageStaysREAL 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Do you know EVERY single event of 9/11 is consistant with the nuclear demolition theory?"
That is why you cannot name a single one, right?
"Do you even know what corroborated means?"
When a hypothesis is or is not fully supported by the available evidence. Considering you have yet to provide a single peice of evidence which supports your 80KM deep nuclear detonation theory, I wager that you are the one who is unaware of the meaning of the word corroborate.
Shill.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Why is Judy Wood the only person to begin legal action against nist,"
She is not the only one...thanks for demonstrating your incredible lack of knowledge on this topic.
"Explain the earths documented magnetic spike at the exact moment of the impacts..hmm DERP? "
If it were a nuclear detonation which caused this, how did it then do nothing for two hours until collapse?
Your nuclear theory is pathetic. It is completely uncorroborated.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "The number of GZ workers to die cant be explained by asbestos, as they all had cheap masks, but that doesnt stop radiation. ND is the only theory that can explain all."
Do you realize hw many public radiation monitoring stations there are in the USA? Do you realize how impossible it is to hide a nuclear detonation from the world? You demonstrate your lack of knowledge on nuclear each comment you make. Please do continue.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@99Eternal Do you know how many nuclear detonation and public radiation monitoring stations are under govt control? And do you know the difference between the gamma and x ray radiation emitted from an atmospheric and underground detonation? Have these thoughts even entered your mind? Or is it 24/7 non-stop thermite was EVERYWHERE and the cause of EVERYTHING, and still have not presented it as a legal matter? Since you're so very sure, whats holding the truth movement back?
ThisPageStaysREAL 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL You are a fool. There are monitoring networks made up of nothing but PUBLIC monitors, networks which anyone can participate in. Not to mentions the hundreds of COUNTRIES worldwide? Are they all under the control of the U.S government? Laughable.
You still have not mentioned a single phenomena that cannot be explained by thermitic reactions...remember that?
"whats holding the truth movement back?"
Are you an IDIOT?
99Eternal 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "The extreme heat months after 9/11 cant be explained by thermite,explosives,jet fuel or santa clause. "
Actually, they are easily explained by thermitic reactions. Did you know that the core of the Earth is molten? How does it maintain this? Because molten iron/steel, with it's extremely slow heat dissipation, will remain molten in a sealed environment such as a rubble pile, where the heat cannot escape. Nuclear demolition...laughable.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "Thermite can melt steel, but not pulverize it into fine dust.. And explosives cant pulverize steel either."
What evidence do you have that the steel was turned into dust? This isn't possible...
They built a warship out of the steel....the USS NY I believe? There are thousands of photos documenting structural steel, it most certainly wasn't all turned to dust, you fool.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@99Eternal i suppose youre very right. Me, i never did good in science classes, and if i did, it was so long ago. but seeing those cars reminded me of like the terminator. DAMN TECHNOLOGY for being able to exactly explain things. :P
smeganrocks87 2 months ago
@99Eternal good point.
smeganrocks87 2 months ago
Agreed. If you look at some of the film taken of WTC7 'collapsing' you will note that the penthouse section just sinks like a cake collapsing in the middle. It must have been some sort of powerful explosion that almost vaporised the inside of the building for that to happen. Your small nuclear device makes a lot of sense.
caxtonman 2 months ago
@caxtonman "It must have been some sort of powerful explosion that almost vaporised the inside of the building for that to happen. Your small nuclear device makes a lot of sense."
Why on Earth would a Nuclear detonation "make sense"? When you can accomplish the same result, with MUCH HIGHER ACCURACY using thermitic reactions?
Why did the hundreds of radiation monitoring stations not pick up these detonations? You idiot....look at my 9/11 playlist and stop the blatant , pathetic trolling.
99Eternal 2 months ago
Comment removed
caxtonman 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL I see some of my comments have been removed, what's all that about? Did I say something that struck a nerve? Weird.
caxtonman 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "the only theory i support is the one that states the official story is a lie. I support the nuclear demo theory, and i do believe thermite was also used. I feel thermite was used in addition."
Then why did you mention Judy Wood (DEW theory) and suggest that people research her work?
Do you honestly beleive this was a combination of DEW, Nuclear and Thermitic? Why when everything is so easily explained by Thermitic alone, and there are so many holes in DEW and nuclear?
99Eternal 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL "The dust that building falls into cannot simply be explained by thermite alone, nor can the entire collapse be explained by Controlled Demolition."
What Characteristics are you speaking of that could not have resulted from a controlled demo using thermate of some type?
"And if i can ask, who exactly refutes both theories, and setting aside thermite what grounds were used to refute them?"
AE911TRUTH point out the holes in DEW. Nuclear holds no water to begin with.
99Eternal 2 months ago
@99Eternal Judy wood only presents the facts..nothing more. Its worth noting that 9/11 has become this tiny spectrum of the actual event. People find themselves on one side or another, of one particular aspect of that day, ie the collapse. Dr Wood earned my respect just for not getting trapped in the BS box of 911, what she brings up is mostly unknown to many here who have landed in the simple thermite vs official story debate. A puzzle cant be completed when pieces are missing.
ThisPageStaysREAL 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL Nuclear Demolition and Judy Wood's DEW theory are disinformation, both have been heavily refuted. I can mention one item that refutes both theories. Previously molten iron micropsheres found in ALL known WTC dust samples. This wouldn't be the case if it were a "kick-start" in a specifric area as you claim. Nor would we be seeing the molten steel fall from the impact zones....
How can you support two seperate theories in just two comments? Are you Newt Gingrich?
99Eternal 2 months ago
Comment removed
caxtonman 2 months ago
Comment removed
caxtonman 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL That would explain a lot. I don't think people realise that all the technology that we, the ordinary people, see is in fact 10 or 20 years behind what the 'powers that be' have in their possession - so it looks like to us an impossible reality. Please tell me more.
caxtonman 2 months ago
@caxtonman Ok, well there is a guy who is unknown to most ppl on both sides of this debate named Demitri Khalezov, he was an officer in some branch of Russia's military involved with nuclear munitions. He actually has quite a plausible explanation of 911, and lays it out quite directly. Upon hearing the idea of nuclear demolition, most people picture hiroshima and dismiss the notion. But after hearing this guy explain it, its clear he knows what he's talking about. /watch?v=eAV_BUQoGBw
ThisPageStaysREAL 2 months ago
@caxtonman You're right about the amount of secrecy that surrounds the govt, and what progress they have made in what fields. The public now is almost like a child that looks to the Govt for the explanation of all lifes events. Sadly the Govt likes it that way these days. Anyhow, you can search for other info, such as the work of Judy Wood, who has more credentials than needed, and is the one who sued Nist as in insider/whistleblower. She uses only facts,to ask questions. fliped burned cars etc
ThisPageStaysREAL 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ThisPageStaysREAL Thanks for the info, I will check it out. Did you hear the small explosions in the background at around 4 minutes in? From a building that was not targeted or hit directly? It's a shame that the de-bunkers can't view the obvious evidence with objectivity and scientific facts, which only serves to dishonour those poor people who perished for the sake of some twisted agenda.
caxtonman 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Lugare2011 Also if you look at the shots of building 7 you will notice that the actual frames are bent outwards, as if blown from the inside out. You would assume that the very nature of it's construction that the glass and frames were heavily engineered to withstand alot of pressure. And blown out all in a row on a couple of floors!
caxtonman 2 months ago
Comment removed
caxtonman 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Manuel Garcia Jr, physicist and engineer, presents his three separate reports, undertaken for CounterPunch. Against the lies of the conspiracy from 2006
Part Three, "Dark Fire", is his report on the collapse of the World Trade Center’s Building 7:
w w w . counterpunch . org/2006/11/28/dark-fire/
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An Initial Microstructural Analysis of A36 Steel from WTC Building 7
J.R. Barnett, R.R. Biederman, and R.D. Sisson, Jr.
J.R. Barnett is a professor of fire protection engineering, and R.R. Biederman and R.D. Sisson, Jr. are professors of materials science and engineering, at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts, 01609.
w w w . tms . org /pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Biederman/Biederman-0112.html
aczjbr 2 months ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 2 months ago
@aczjbr "Many of you have not heard of metallography. It is an engineering science. Only those who know the area is. It proves that the temperature in the towers and WTC7 came to +1800°F "
Exactly, and Jet Fuel and Office Fires max at 599°F. Look it up. Incredibly stupid person.
BTW, A&E features several metallurgical analysts. You realize that you are saying that these people have never heard of a trade which they have been experts in for decades?? HAHA. Are you inbred?
99Eternal 2 months ago
@99Eternal I still have universities of France, Australia, Canada, UK, Germany, Austria, Brazil, Singapore, Hong Kong and China to censor you. All against you and your conspiracy. It's a lot of people to blame. Where did you learn to be a false Athenian?
aczjbr 2 months ago
@aczjbr Try refuting my claims instead of claiming you have a host of universities to "censor me". Something tells me you do not know the meaning of censorship, why would a university censor me? Because i am right and they cannot refute it so they must try to evade it??
You yourself said the temps reached 1800degrees F. Jet Fuels and Fires max at 599 degrees F. Where did the extra 2000 degrees f come from than?? YOU SAID IT FOOL, NOT ME! YOU PROVED YOURSELF INCORRECT, AND I LOVE IT!
99Eternal 2 months ago
@99Eternal As I understand it you are referring to the fuel and its maximum temperature. Ai even if you're not an engineer. That was the ignition. The thermal reserve of the steel structure raised the temperature of the fire. You've never been in a metal frame construction? Further without the fire system. You should study. Mr. George Vandervoort is superior to you. And it makes you understand?
aczjbr 2 months ago
@aczjbr Steel cannot reach higher temperatures than it's source. You are confusing a theory with reality. Yes, an environment with red hot steel will keep fires at/near their max potential temperature of 599 degrees F, but it can and will not exceed the temperature of it's source, LET ALONE 2,000 DEGREES F ABOVE IT"S SOURCE, steel cannot do this, you IDIOT!
99Eternal 2 months ago
@aczjbr Could not have been the result of a single column failure. A single column failure cannot possibly result in global symmetrical collapse, at free-fall acceleration for the first 8 stories of collapse (this can only occur if ALL resistance has been removed, not a SINGLE COLUMN). You fool.
watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw&feature=channel_video_title
Educate yourself before spamming my videos with nonsense.
99Eternal 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ronald Hamburger, a structural engineer and Senior Principal at Simpson Gumpertz and Heger consulting engineers in San Francisco, will discuss why those buildings collapsed and illustrate his talk with graphics. He was a principal author of FEMA's initial report on the collapse of the twin towers and later a key participant in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) study.
h t t p : / / 911research.wtc7.net/essays/green/hamburger.html
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest
Read more: World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest - Popular Mechanics - Magazine bought by the CIA?
w w w . popularmechanics . com /technology /engineering / architecture /4278874
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, Ph.D., P.E., Professor of Structural Egineering, Berkeley. Consultant on Design, Failure Analysis and Protection of Buildings and Bridges against Terrist Attacks
Civil & Structural Engineers on WTC7 Collapse
h t t p : / / 911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/astaneh-wtc.htm
aczjbr 2 months ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Three trade associations representing the U.S. engineers. All against al Qaeda and purchased by the CIA?
Structure Magazine - A Join Publication of NCSEA / CASE / SEI
National Council of Structural Engineers Associations, American Council Of Engineering Companies & Structural Engineering Institute.How the Loss of One Column May Have Led to the Collapse of WTC 7 - Ramon Gilsanz, PE, SE, Willa Ng
w w w . structuremag . org / article . aspx?articleID = 284
aczjbr 2 months ago
From the sound of the footfalls when walking outside, the glass from that building was blown out rather than in. Didn't see glass on the ground when he filmed the inside.
66eccles 3 months ago
@66eccles Sorry. Meant to say inside. I don't really hear a difference between the two is what i am trying to get at though. Then again, I think I have hearing loss.
Just out of curiosity, what are you getting at?
Thanks for commenting.
99Eternal 3 months ago
@impleasen you are 100% correct
hiphopfreak31 3 months ago
that building was blown up they even said to pull it
all part of the governments plan to head overseas to bully people around
militarty industrial complex controls the world and everything inbetween
impleasen 3 months ago 8
who thought this would be smart to film here?
SlimShaney08 3 months ago
Looks like there was an explosion at ground level.......
o0POSH0o 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest
Read more: World Trade Center 7 Report Puts 9/11 Conspiracy Theory to Rest - Popular Mechanics - Magazine bought by the CIA?
w w w . popularmechanics . com/technology/engineering/architecture/4278874
aczjbr 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
URGENT - FRAUD "A & E TRUTH."
Effondrement des tours jumelles
The analysis of the explosives expert Jowenko was used by conspiracy theorists to show that WTC 7 was deliberately demolished. In the same interview, he explains that the controlled demolition of the twin towers is impossible. Dynamite would have exploded right away, and it would have taken a year to put everything in place. in English.
w w w . dailymotion. com / video/x2l5k9 _ effondrement-des-tours-jumelles_ news
aczjbr 3 months ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 3 months ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EUROPE DIRECT. Demonstrating that all sciences are the conspiracy against the disease.
Je m'appelle Claude Valette. Je suis un physicien (supraconductivité, puis acoustique musicale, puis astrophysique), retraité, anciennement Directeur de Recherche au CNRS.
WTC physique rumeur - Physique de l’effondrement des tours du World Trade Center, WTC2, WTC1, WTC7, analyse de la rumeur, 50 pages en pdf par Claude Valette.
claudevalette . unblog . fr/
aczjbr 3 months ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 3 months ago
Comment removed
aczjbr 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please go to link and be aware that no engineering college in the USA, Canada, Europe, China, Brazil and Australia accepts the conspiracy theory unhealthy. much less in WTC7. There is evidence against this demolition jet.
Structure Magazine - A Join Publication of NCSEA / CASE / SEI
How the Loss of One Column May Have Led to the Collapse of WTC 7 - Ramon Gilsanz, PE, SE, Willa Ng
w w w . structuremag . org / article . aspx?articleID = 284
aczjbr 3 months ago
As a film director, my immediate question is, where are the bodies in the burned out cars in the final third of this video? This entire event looks as staged as a Universal Studios backlot picture. The park positions of the vehicles are unnatural and absolutely 100% staged. This was a production. I make them. I recognize them. I don't care what ANYONE says to deny that.
iwantoldschool 3 months ago
Hrm, so this is before South Tower collapsed, correct?
cod7strats 3 months ago