@fbi10 also you know the funny thing? is how sarah palin authorises this savage killing of wolves and bears etc and most of the hunters are christian...doesnt the bible state thou shalt not kill? its doesnt state thou shall not kill another human..it says though shall not kill. hypacritical no matter what the reasoning. ah well just saying is all.
@ryuji8009 your reasoning makes no sense...thou shall not kill, not murder another human being...the united states constitution MANDATES that our natural resources are to be developed and utilized. In the area of fish and wildlife, it is to be managed for "sustained yield". That means managed to make it easier to put meat on my table.
palin authorized yes but the policy didn't start with her and the current governor still uses it...
@AbaddonAndy i wouldnt bother hunchkin. I know the type of user this guy is.Even when he is wrong he is right and nothing will convince him that he is taking the professional art of talking ballocks. thank you so much for the entertainment tho babes ;-)
i stand by what i said fuck palin and people need 2 get with the times that all i have 2 say end off if it 2 real 4 u 2 bad try and keep up if not your need 2 go its that easy
@AbaddonAndy Do you know how much it costs to fly food out to the rural areas? A gallon of milk can cost up to 9$ would you rather have free food by going hunting or have to pay 9$ for a gallon of milk.
@MrShethinksmytractor 1 do they eat wolves no 2 yeah i would rather pay $9 2 get them milk it that what it takes 2 keep the wolves alive 3 did u read any of the points i made hmm ? guess not coz u ask this fucked up question 4 would not u 5 the other stuff they do eat is all so what the wolves eat so what do u think we should do oh high and might hmmm
like i said get with the times there is no reason 4 then 2 live like that and if the die becoz of it then 2 damn bad and if all alaskas eat what they hunt then that is being a "caveman" in this day and age we dont need 2 hunt if u huny your food u are behind the rest of us and should keep up or be gone if your not willing 2 see that then 2 bad hunting is a pointless thing we dont need 2 do it anymore
@AbaddonAndy asking eskimos and people in certain rural areas to get with the times is ignorant...it's not that simple and not everyone has that opportunity. That's not being a caveman, that's living...not everyone lives in the urban cities. we don't need to hunt? do you eat meat? where do you think the meat comes from? like i said...maybe learn about alaska and those rural areas.
@fbi10 ....you are a fucking loser. these guys owned your arse and they are probably laughing about it. As a girl? id say you need a serious fucking LOL
@fbi10 asking someone 2 get with the time is not ignorant i know its not easy but they should do it that way they dont need 2 live like that and yes i eat meat and its comes from areas that are up 2 date ie no 1 go and finds a pig ect and kills it like that we us up 2 date stuff 2 do it with out guns ect
@AbaddonAndy who said it was for nothing? the policy is for providing a healthy population of certain herds and to have plently of game for everyone, not only wolves...
@AbaddonAndy i said stop "playing" victim...i didn't say you are a victim, there's a difference. Tu parles le français ou pas? Car c'est difficile de te comprends lorsque tu écris en anglais...
you don't have any facts that help you with what we were discussing
@fbi10 so killing wolves is not wrong and she does kill then its not emotion and if point out stuff is complaining then so are u by point out stuff and u are point out what i am doing what do u think i was doing be4 u said i was complaining the policy is wrong 4 killing the wolves u have no leg 2 stand on now get over it u
@AbaddonAndy this isn't about wrong or right but WHY they have such a policy...which you never debunked or provided a rebuttal for....this is the so called population control of a certain species in a rural area...this isnt everywhere in alaska. That's all there is to it.
the policy is harsh but needed. like i said this is for the families in those rural areas who need food..
i have both legs and arms...you got nothing not even a seat...
@fbi10 oh yeah coz people would die if wolves are in those "rural areas " (ie no food there is other stuff 2 eat ) all i have 2 say 2 that is get with the time its that easy and dont give me they cant are they in a 3 world nope so its bullshit funny u say something that might be good then u add your games at the end why just keep it 2 the point its not hard and 4 the no game thing easy get a fine something 2 do
@AbaddonAndy they live in rural areas,that means no supermarkets...you live off of what you hunt and if your food is declining, you start to worry...you realize you can't bring food to the table. what else is there to eat in those areas? Alaskans, all of them, live off of what is hunted...it's called the last frontier for a reason. Wolves have been known to get over populated, and that is why. 3 world? no it's just life in alaska something u don't know about. so again, stop with the emotion crap
@fbi10 your the 1 if no fact with my point and you yet again if u read what i said u will see i said if point out stuff is complaing then u are complaing but pionting out stuff coz that all i did was piont out the fact u have nothing so i give u it again (my point as dumbed down as i can be 4 u ) palin is wrong 4 killing wolves just like any1 sure be if u have a point that fits what i said then good if all your going 2 do is beat about the bush pick up your ball and go end of
@AbaddonAndy when did i complain about what we were talking about? pointing out that you are wrong and why isn't complaining...saying i can't understand what you are saying is not complaining...i am pointing out what you are doing. Again, we can start all over again, Palin wasn't the one doing the actual shooting and if she was, and in those rural areas, how is she wrong? i think that u still don't know why they have that policy...like i've stated, you are using emotion for your argument... : /
@fbi10 more times than even i can count but hey it was too fun....you were entertainment at end of the day proving your stupidity. i said agree to disagree and you refused you cant face your contradiction that you NEED me to agree. the meaning of agree to disagree is to accept that i disagree with you and i have already accepted that you disagree with me on the matter. I have already owned you. end of. and i dont need you to admit it or agreee. Now this is the last reply.contract worthy one. Bye
@Titchwolffenriz yes yes i was contradicting myself without...contradicting myself??? Btw, i am still waiting for you to show me where exactly i contradicted myself...Yes i know the meaning but again, that would mean i agree with you on that...and i told you...I DON'T CARE LOL!!! It is w/e with me...i already proved you wrong on this subject. The only thing you "own" me is in lying...sorry i don't play that game. seriously, you are pathetic...
@AbaddonAndy "all u have is name calling and the contradiction thing 2 go on with titch has all ready show u so but that u are beating around the bush"
you're playing victim...stop bitching about name calling when you do it yourself...man the fuck up LOL
@AbaddonAndy that's all you ever had! at least i backed my name calling up with facts YOU HAVE NOT...stop complaining and stop trying to be a victim...
@fbi10 yet again if that all u have pick up your ball and go what has she does other then take crap and kill wolves and i dont deserve shit why would i wont shit i cant do anything with it ( see i can play this game 2 )
Minnesota or Michigan = bating and ignorant how coz she can get a way with killing wolves and i cant say i hope she dies i can say i have the right 2 say that so u have no leg 2 stand on with that 1 and she is not a govenor the vid we are on is about her not staying as govenor dont u watch the vid ? and her policy is what she think just coz he live in alaska dont me anything
@AbaddonAndy wait a minute...she didn't kill wolves in those states LOL!!!! When you are calling someone a title that they once held like Governor or President, it's a term of respect...youre 21 u should know this shit...
She's from Alaska not Minnesota or Michigan...try again, you keep on failing...
u keep up i am trying 2 get 2 the real point of the convo jackass your the 1 makeing it about alaska and yeah i KONW its called bating keep up ... LOL palin DONT = alaska its 2 do with what she thinks that it nothing moer u add in stuff that was not about that 2 make your self all good but its all a show
@AbaddonAndy the real point of the convo from the beginning was your ignorant statement about Governor Palin and then you went on to talk about her policy on wolves...which is in ALASKA...not in Minnesota or Michigan
@fbi10 and again you are missing the point...if you didnt need me to agree with you you would have just agreed to disagree and left it but no...you alwayhs have to reply ...so...farewell :-)
@Titchwolffenriz no because i would agree now wouldn't i? so again, where is the contradiction? i don't need to agree with me or agree to disagree...i don't give a fuck LOL
tho if wolves dont need 2 on the endangered list why do people ask us 2 save me that my point more dumb down 4 u easyer 2 understand now i was never on about alaska i was on about palin not a alaska palin does not = alaska
@AbaddonAndy again, they aren't endangered in alaska, which was one of my points from the get go....you keep changing your mind and keep on saying well they are endangered in other states...that doesn't matter to me or this Palin hatred that you have going...LOL
It doesn't matter if i agree to disagree because I DON'T care what you think about any of this...meaning i don't need to agree with you on anything. My facts have proved me right while yours have done equally for me. Again, where is the contradictory? It would be contradictory if i said i agree to disagree and then just say no i don't agree to disagree, i would be contradicting what i've said...
@AbaddonAndy "if your point wasn't about alaska, why mention Palin and hunting wolves...? My point this whole time was about Palin and wolves in ALASKA...no where else..."
In response to what you said that wolves are endangered species but i never argued the fact that they are endangered else where but they are NOT endangered in alaska, which was my point when he started that discussion. So now, why are changing your story ? lol!!!
@AbaddonAndy " I am not talking about Michigan, Minnesota or Wisconsin, i said in ALASKA....in the state of alaska they are NOT one the endangered species list."
@fbi10 come on man...you're a "smart" guy...i dont care about your case anymore like i sad i know what i know lets just leave it at that..or cant you?
ok i did not wont 2 do this but oh well 1 me and titch we both talking about the same thing u added in other stuff so we have 2 look throw all of it 2 titchs point still stand as the wolves are not the ones killing the mooses ect on mass people are 3 people kill moer mosse etc then any wolf 4 and hunting of wolves is wrong 5 if your agree on palin with it there u are dumb end off (tell me i misrepresen u there )
@AbaddonAndy you were talking about wolves being endangered in alaska and you go to mention other states while i was saying that they aren't endangered in alaska...nice try.
@fbi10 actually i am baiting you very well :-) agree to disagree...you have stated already you dont NEED me to agree with you and yet you have refused to accept that 6 times now ...is there going to be a 7th now..let me look at my magic 8 ball...its says more than likely you have ignored the point that this is the main contradiction i was talking about and i have stated about an hour ago i dont care about your case anymore and i have stuck to that point by not mentioning it . agree to disagree?
@Titchwolffenriz however you failed because my point wasn't to you but to your "mate" and how me and him were in fact talking about the wolves being NOT endangered species in Alaska...me and u were talking about something completely different...so again, you failed lol!!! youre doing a pretty poor job of "baiting...
@AbaddonAndy cool man i just want to see if my experiment here works...if he agrees i get what i want if he doesnt? then he just proves me right and if he doesnt respond? then he does us all a favour and takes his ignorance and ego elsewhere. it doesnt matter what he says or doesnt say now.
@fbi10 havent i told you i dont care about this erm...argument anymore? the only one continuing to bring it up is you..you say you dont NEED me to agree with you and yet when i said agree to disagree you have refused on no fewer than 5 occasions..that is a contradiction of major proportions. i know what i know and i dont care what your case is anymore. it is time to move on. it is done. All you are doing now is wasting your own time by typing pointless replies. its over.agree to disagree? :-)
@Titchwolffenriz again, you ignored what i said...why did you lie about what i said and misrepresent what i said? What did i contradict? You still FAILED to point that out and yet you still hold on to that like a child.
the only one that keeps on typing pointless replies is you...you failed to provide any sort of rebuttal then you ignore what i ask...why did you lie about what i said?
@Titchwolffenriz just let it man all u should say 2 him is ok your right the world work 2 how u and palin see it happy now and let it go coz this is geting moer and moer pointless and time goes on let him have this 1 if need it that bad we know we looked at it and it have nothing 2 do with anything but ffs man let it go now ( bet he will say something 2 now )
@fbi10 yup and your articles are erm...not...biased...i told you i dont care anymore..from what i know my facts are right and from what you know your facts are right...i am willing to let it go i have just pointed out that you have contradicted yourself twice...agree to disagree...if you really dont need me to agree with you..
@fbi10 oh and i thought your point was about wolves in rural areas in alaska...you have used so called evidence stating that your concerns were rural areas of alaska not just alaska as a whole....bravo..once again you have just contradicted yourself twice in 5 minutes
@Titchwolffenriz "when your facts are about alaska in general and not the rural areas where the hunting happens and that's what we've been talking about, they really don't matter"
When you talk about alaska in general and not the rural areas where the hunting happens, your so called facts dont represent or debunk anything i've said...yes my points were about the rural areas...where did i contradict myself? you seem to use that word a lot, do u know what means ?? lol...again caught u lying...
ok 1 more time her policy on wolf killing is pointless and IF some1 agrees wher her on it then i hope they die . palin does not = alaska nor do wolves now let it go
@fbi10 my point was not about alaska but whatever your right ect ect ect your no better then a fundamental christian like titch said we dont care now but i do know this your will have somethng 2 say 2 it i give u 5 mins
@AbaddonAndy if your point wasn't about alaska, why mention Palin and hunting wolves...? My point this whole time was about Palin and wolves in ALASKA...no where else...
Titchwolffenriz all he does is say its not proof whne it is hell i look at he wet add that he show us wikianswer and it show nothing about where palin did or did say it and i used the same 1 wikianswer and geuss what wolves are on the list so what is it are they on the list coz the wet add say so or did palin say thos thing
@AbaddonAndy i dont know man im not even going to humour him anymore.....he so NEEDS us to agree with him...hes an attention feeder...and a fucking mouth breeder thats doin nothing but sucking up bandwidth
@fbi10 like i said..humans have legs for travelling...moving to other areas...ands humanity has hunted moose as much as wolves have so none of their reasons can possibly be justified. My documentaries gave you all that you need and yet you are so unwilling to admit it like an attention seeking ass whore. you seriously need to get laid soon. now i say for the last time..cos now i dont care anymore..AGREE to DISAGREE? show some balls...its way past time to move on...im going now 100% goodbye
@Titchwolffenriz your documentaries provided NOTHING on the subject of wolf hunting in rural areas....but my sources did. You were wrong...plain and simple. Yes move on and go to bed...
no not agree to disagree when the facts don't support any of your positions...good riddance...
@fbi10 dude....you so need to get laid....im past the point of caring whos right and whos wrong...your proof is nothing more than humanity's excuse. i accept you believe what you are saying as right..i dont need you to agree with me..where as you NEED me to agree with you its getting ridiculous now.Get a hobby.
@Titchwolffenriz i don't need for you to agree with me or not...i know my facts are correct but you, who lies constantly about what i said or misrepresenting what my sources say is childish and sad. take responsibility of what you said and leave...go learn how to debate and take a course with your "mate" while you're at it....
@Titchwolffenriz it's too bad that your facts aren't apart of our discussion in rural alaskan areas....lol!!!! come back when you learn a thing or 2...
@fbi10 "if your point wasnt about alaska why mention palin and hunting wolves...? My point this whole time was about palin and wolves in ALASKA...no where else..." = contradiction
@Titchwolffenriz that wasn't towards you, that was towards your "mate" when he said " my point was not about alaska but whatever your right ect ect ect" it wasn't towards you....
i didn't contradict anything but nice try buddy....
I know that was your point but you not knowing where these policies are used, that's your ignorance, not mine....
@fbi10 actually you did..you have stated time and time again that the rural areas are what your concerned with and you have stated in my documentaries i have shown you the rural areas arent mentioned in my documentaries even tho its ALASKA the rural areas are included it goes without saying...you stated they needed to be mentioned... then you say to andy you were talkin about ALASKA the entire time ...where was the rural areas in that point? *looks again* nope dont see it
@Titchwolffenriz no they are not included. Those rural areas are particular to the subject, they are different...it's completely different statistic and situation when it comes to those rural villages and an urban city. Your documentaries don't talk about it my sources do. It's in those rural areas where this policy is applied...not in the urban cities.
Me and Ab were talking about Alaska yes but alaskan wolves as they aren't on the endangered species list, he mentioned other states,
@Titchwolffenriz cont: so that doesn't make sense and there are no contradictions....
We weren't talking about the rural areas because we were talking about the endangered species list...he gave me something else that had nothing to do with alaska. Me and you, however, were talking about the rural regions as to where the policy of hunting wolves is applied...completely different and more fail on your part...
@Titchwolffenriz when did i say that YOU need to agree with me? I said that i don't care if you agree or not, what i care about is when you openly lie about what i stated and misrepresent my position or what my sources says...
@fbi10 yup...whatever dude...for someone that doesnt need me to agree with tyou i already said agree to disagree you refused...you also replied my facts arent appart of our discussion when i said i know my facts are correct. So for someone that doesnt need me to agree with you you're sure persistant arent you? bravo...you sure proved your point there
@Titchwolffenriz when your facts are about alaska in general and not the rural areas where the hunting happens and that's what we've been talking about, they really don't matter...like i said, you choose to ignore my article that talks about this and you also chose to misrepresent my fact check article...you're confused...you seem obsessed...
cont: also, your documentaries never talked about any of this...the only thing that came close was a bias video as to why it is wrong and they never talked about why it even started. You also lied when you said that the policy was cancelled and Palin reactivated...but continue to ignore it, i hope it makes you feel better...
@AbaddonAndy..he wont stop replying he keeps going on i keep replying because i "hate" to be proven wrong yet he keeps replying too...purely hypacritical
again if it proves nothing then way did i fine it oh that right 2 show u my point and fuck u oh i mean thx u 4 backing back with nothing now plz stop filling my email box with your bullshit titch have show u stuff i told au stuff if u dont wont 2 see then fine and i have looked at all your stuff and it have nothiing 2 do with what i was on about yet again your bypassed it time and time again so i ask u 1 moer time stop replying
@AbaddonAndy all my sources did prove that i was correct and in what way did it prove otherwise? you "talk" in generalities and don't make sense half the time...LMAO!!!
fuck me this guy still at it i came back 2 make sure my email was right and what do i find this guy still has nothing 2 show and the stuf he showed me was all bull titch doc talks about wolves being wolves that 1 of the point we are trying 2 make and btw dont even think about coz even if u are SOME how right i know u would say some thing like see i told u ect ect ect (dont say anything 2 me coz this message is not 4 u fbi10 )
@fbi10 and i already stated 1 will show you why the reasoning of hunting wolves is bullshit and thats because it mentions depopulating wolves to 80% is ridiculous cos they dont know the exact figures and the other? is about wolf behaviour and i stated that to prove that wolves attack 1 at a time. You bypassed that yet again to suit your needs.
@Titchwolffenriz again, i already proved that it is not bullshit because this has everything to do with having enough caribou/moose in certain areas without the population declining too much, which happens because of the overpopulation of wolves in certain areas. who says depopulating wolves by 80%?
yes and they attack herds and kill calves....again, you don't understand what you are arguing LOL!!!
@fbi10 i have told you time and time again that the article means nothing because it is humanity's excuse for killing. Besides if it was so bad in that area they couldve just moved o another area. Humanity has legs for travelling. And if the moose population has increased so much...why are they STILL hunting wolves? wouldnt it be time to leave them alone? and like i said they mate so they are ever increasing and wolves have natural rights. something you clearly dont understand. their world too.
@Titchwolffenriz did you not read the article? it said that they didn't reach their target area and it didn't say it grew a lot but none the less, the population has grown. Yes they have natural rights but so do we...
how many areas are people allowed to hunt for wolves again? what was that again?
@fbi10 you have gotten all that you need and it doesnt matter about the population of moose in mcgrath cos it was humanity hunting them constantly in the first place that got them in that mess idiot wolves follow their nature..humanity kills them for it..
@Titchwolffenriz "you have gotten all that you need" u've given me nothing thus far
" it doesnt matter about the population of moose in mcgrath "
it was an example: the moose population: "The agency said the moose population there has grown from 2,774 in 2004 to an estimated 5,500 moose now. The goal is to reach 6,000 to 8,000 moose" from that source i gave you..meaning, it's not 200 000 mooses in one area or a million caribou, these areas don't have all the resources in the world...
@fbi10 still have 2 back back with some thing did not u your ego must be in pain or something coz its geting 2 the point where all u do is say shit about my spelling or that i dont make sense funny that i can read all my stuff and know what i am on about u have a hard time understanding what i say u must have a real heard time reading the stuff titch says (again stop taking 2 me and i will stop taking 2 u its that easy )
@fbi10 i cant stand to be proven wrong? oh ho...funny how you responed by saying the documentaries prove nothing before watching them...yeah the time frame of the documentaries? 10-30 mins long...the time frime you responded? hmm about 5 mins max funny that...you didnt even look at the documentaries.
@Titchwolffenriz really then why have you kept on saying bye and you come back when i keep on proving you wrong, cry baby?
You have given me nothing on this subject, no documentaries that support your claim...nothing. Yes i have, i already seen both of them, one isn't about alaska and the other doesn't talk about the rural areas but alaska in general. So again, WHAT documentary did you see that talks about this stuff???
@fbi10 of course you would say that it does nothing to address what you stated..because it doesnt need to..IT goes without saying...it doesnt need to...it doesnt need to spell it out for anyone because its not a documentary for confused children...it wont carry youyou have been given all the proof you need...no more no less. adios.
@fbi10 i didnt fail to answer it..i chose not to cos it doesnt relate to anything but your own benefit of reasoning. And i didnt say it talked about rural ares. i said it talked about Alaska in the forms of every area of alaska..it doesnt mention rural areas cos it goes without saying that they are included dumbass.
@Titchwolffenriz yes you chose not to which means you failed to answer it. I am not talking about Alaska in general, this policy is only activated in the rural areas that's why it is important to not talk in generalities...no they aren't included, swamp insect. It's a totally different thing...
@fbi10 Wolf.....hunting...tactics there it is spaced out so you can read it clearly this time and you have just proved my point...any certifiable proof i give you you will not agree to it simply cos it doesnt work to your favour and your link states the 1 million caribou that are still there..its clear as day....what you dont realise is the documentaries cover all of alaska..it doesnt NEED to mention rural..i told you..humanity always does anything to keep up appearances they need to justify it!
@Titchwolffenriz by nationa geographic and again, they don't talk about wolves in the rural areas in alaska...what documentary did you watch that talks about it...???
1 million in general or in the rural areas? answer the question?
what documentary covered all of alaska that you watched and that they talk about the rural areas?
what is the population of moose in the rural area of McGrath??
@fbi10 if this isnt enough for you i dont know what is type in the last wild wolves in youtube that will show you wolf behaviour..NOTHING to do with rural areas but it will show you what you disagreed with earlier that wolves dont take 1 at a time..they take the weakest of the herd to feed themselves..and they also do that to keep the species of caribou strong. imagine that. But as for rural areas? sarah palin isnt authorising it in rural ares
@Titchwolffenriz we were never talking about wolves in general but wolves in the rural areas where the population control of wolves is happening...it has EVERYTHING to do with this because you both addressed the hunting of wolves without knowing the facts. You've been driven by emotion and blinded by facts. Sarah Palin did authorize it in rural areas but it didn't start with Palin but with the previous governor. I never aruged about how wolves hunt but i did say that in those rural areas
cont. "argued"....but i did say that in those rural areas that the overpopulation of wolves were declining the population of caribou/moose in low numbers that were dangerous...that's it. I asked you for the documentary in where you told me they talked about wolves in alaska in the rural areas but you didn't show me...you lied. Plain and simple...
again, what was the population of the moose in the rura area of McGrath compared to now...???
@fbi10 yes and it was cancelled before sarah palin..she reactivated it dumbass. and these documentaries dont need to mention rural areas cos when they talk about alaska cos it goes without saying that when they say alaska they mean Alaska..the rural areas INCLUDED dumbass
@fbi10also im going to give you another documentary of the reasoning on your sites excuse for wolf hunting in alaska is bullshit. it is caled the truth about aerial hunting of wolves in alaska. your idiotic reasoning about rural areas is bullshit cos 1. no1 mentioned it before you..we were talking about sarah palins policy of it. and 2. this documentary is relating to your site.if it is not enough for you? you're moronic
u know what fuck this guy 2 easy yeah it would be if he know some thing 4 all thos who will see this my points are as ( look 4 them it not hard ) btw fbi10 if your like what palin and other have said about wolves then i hope u meet a wolf 1 day and see 4 your self
@AbaddonAndy i love wolves and i have seen and met them...but you have yet to provide me with anything matter of fact you provided me with links that actually help me...thank you
fuck me? no, i don't swing that way...why don't you go see titch, your "mate" about that....
@AbaddonAndy no we were talking about the policy in Alaska that permits citizens to decline the wolf population in certain areas. Not wolves in general. This is a video about Governor Palin and the fact that she supported that policy created in 2003. This wasn't about wolves in general. You started with that filth that Palin is an idiot and she deserves to die, w/e the fuck you said, because she supports hunting wolves but IN alaska...where they aren't endangered. LOL!!!
@fbi10 my point is there on the list i have never said that i was just talking about alaska i was talking about all over if u cant see that then there some thing wrong with u
@AbaddonAndy by National Geographic? Yea like i thought, it doesn't talk about anything in alaska or the situation in the rural areas that you 2 idiots claim to know...in fact, it talks about the grey wolves in Yellowstone park...no where near alaska : / and they are hunting Elk...thank you for proving my point....
!fbi10 With the announcement last week that wolves in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin could be off the endangered species list by the end of the year, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) moved one step closer to putting the state's Wolf Management Plan into action and managing wolves in a scientifically and socially acceptable way. there still on the list right now (may 19 2011)
@AbaddonAndy I am not talking about Michigan, Minnesota or Wisconsin, i said in ALASKA....in the state of alaska they are NOT one the endangered species list.
Whoa...just whoa you both don't understand english....LOL!!!!
@fbi10 ok dipshit this is the last time i do this...www2.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF4/427.html heres the link about why the decrease of caribou in alaska..... you will notice that not once is wolves mentioned...humanity and firearms however are mentioned...there is also wolf hunting tactics in youtube to type and the last wild wolves in youtube theres also many others that if need be will be linked to you if you really are this retarded. enjoy.
@Titchwolffenriz again, they aren't talking about the rural areas but alaska in GENERAL...this was never about in general but in the rural areas...which i stated from the beginning and yet you continue to ignore. My link that i provided earlier only proves that i am correct and also the article i cited 45 or so minutes ago. You are talking about in general and i am not...alaska is the biggest state in the USA...learn what's the difference between rural and cities, and then move on...you're done
cont btw that article is from 1980...try to get a little up to date and also WHAT DOCUMENTARY DID YOU WATCH THAT TALKS ABOUT ALASKA IN THE RURAL AREAS AND WOLVES??? LMAO!!!!!!! this is too easy...
@Titchwolffenriz thx u titch this guy like 2 beat around the bush do he i have made my points have made your point 2 him and all he has is stuff that come out in 2009 all i ask is 4 some thing of 2010 or 2011
@fbi10 also you know the funny thing? is how sarah palin authorises this savage killing of wolves and bears etc and most of the hunters are christian...doesnt the bible state thou shalt not kill? its doesnt state thou shall not kill another human..it says though shall not kill. hypacritical no matter what the reasoning. ah well just saying is all.
ryuji8009 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ryuji8009 your reasoning makes no sense...thou shall not kill, not murder another human being...the united states constitution MANDATES that our natural resources are to be developed and utilized. In the area of fish and wildlife, it is to be managed for "sustained yield". That means managed to make it easier to put meat on my table.
palin authorized yes but the policy didn't start with her and the current governor still uses it...
your reasoning makes no sense..
fbi10 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy pretty much babes. But at the end of the day the loser aint worth the hassle cos he aint convincing anyone. ah well.
ryuji8009 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ryuji8009 i like the mult. accounts but your too much of an idiot for words...
fbi10 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy i wouldnt bother hunchkin. I know the type of user this guy is.Even when he is wrong he is right and nothing will convince him that he is taking the professional art of talking ballocks. thank you so much for the entertainment tho babes ;-)
ryuji8009 4 months ago
@ryuji8009 yeah i know its not hard 2 see my point is get with the time and wolf killing is wrong under any reason
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
i stand by what i said fuck palin and people need 2 get with the times that all i have 2 say end off if it 2 real 4 u 2 bad try and keep up if not your need 2 go its that easy
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AbaddonAndy it's easy to be said when someone such as yourself doesn't understand...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 understand what i say it if i was in there place
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AbaddonAndy that doesn't make sense either...
fbi10 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fbi10 how does it not i say it if i live there its not heard 2 see thats what i said yet again dumbing it down 4 u
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy Do you know how much it costs to fly food out to the rural areas? A gallon of milk can cost up to 9$ would you rather have free food by going hunting or have to pay 9$ for a gallon of milk.
MrShethinksmytractor 1 month ago
@MrShethinksmytractor 1 do they eat wolves no 2 yeah i would rather pay $9 2 get them milk it that what it takes 2 keep the wolves alive 3 did u read any of the points i made hmm ? guess not coz u ask this fucked up question 4 would not u 5 the other stuff they do eat is all so what the wolves eat so what do u think we should do oh high and might hmmm
AbaddonAndy 1 month ago
like i said get with the times there is no reason 4 then 2 live like that and if the die becoz of it then 2 damn bad and if all alaskas eat what they hunt then that is being a "caveman" in this day and age we dont need 2 hunt if u huny your food u are behind the rest of us and should keep up or be gone if your not willing 2 see that then 2 bad hunting is a pointless thing we dont need 2 do it anymore
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy asking eskimos and people in certain rural areas to get with the times is ignorant...it's not that simple and not everyone has that opportunity. That's not being a caveman, that's living...not everyone lives in the urban cities. we don't need to hunt? do you eat meat? where do you think the meat comes from? like i said...maybe learn about alaska and those rural areas.
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 ....you are a fucking loser. these guys owned your arse and they are probably laughing about it. As a girl? id say you need a serious fucking LOL
ryuji8009 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ryuji8009 that's funny...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 asking someone 2 get with the time is not ignorant i know its not easy but they should do it that way they dont need 2 live like that and yes i eat meat and its comes from areas that are up 2 date ie no 1 go and finds a pig ect and kills it like that we us up 2 date stuff 2 do it with out guns ect
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
and why is it wrong easy why kill wolves 4 nothing
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy who said it was for nothing? the policy is for providing a healthy population of certain herds and to have plently of game for everyone, not only wolves...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 like i said nothing no 1 need 2 hunt anything
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy so what do the people do who live in the rural areas and the hunters in alaska do when there's not enough game?
fbi10 4 months ago
still yet 2 be show how i am a victim and facts on my piont
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy i said stop "playing" victim...i didn't say you are a victim, there's a difference. Tu parles le français ou pas? Car c'est difficile de te comprends lorsque tu écris en anglais...
you don't have any facts that help you with what we were discussing
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 so killing wolves is not wrong and she does kill then its not emotion and if point out stuff is complaining then so are u by point out stuff and u are point out what i am doing what do u think i was doing be4 u said i was complaining the policy is wrong 4 killing the wolves u have no leg 2 stand on now get over it u
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy this isn't about wrong or right but WHY they have such a policy...which you never debunked or provided a rebuttal for....this is the so called population control of a certain species in a rural area...this isnt everywhere in alaska. That's all there is to it.
the policy is harsh but needed. like i said this is for the families in those rural areas who need food..
i have both legs and arms...you got nothing not even a seat...
stop with the emotional argument...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 oh yeah coz people would die if wolves are in those "rural areas " (ie no food there is other stuff 2 eat ) all i have 2 say 2 that is get with the time its that easy and dont give me they cant are they in a 3 world nope so its bullshit funny u say something that might be good then u add your games at the end why just keep it 2 the point its not hard and 4 the no game thing easy get a fine something 2 do
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy they live in rural areas,that means no supermarkets...you live off of what you hunt and if your food is declining, you start to worry...you realize you can't bring food to the table. what else is there to eat in those areas? Alaskans, all of them, live off of what is hunted...it's called the last frontier for a reason. Wolves have been known to get over populated, and that is why. 3 world? no it's just life in alaska something u don't know about. so again, stop with the emotion crap
fbi10 4 months ago
again no facts no victim and if point out something is complaing then u are in the same boat as me :D
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy yes you are right you have no facts...lol i never complained i asked questions that is all haha
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 your the 1 if no fact with my point and you yet again if u read what i said u will see i said if point out stuff is complaing then u are complaing but pionting out stuff coz that all i did was piont out the fact u have nothing so i give u it again (my point as dumbed down as i can be 4 u ) palin is wrong 4 killing wolves just like any1 sure be if u have a point that fits what i said then good if all your going 2 do is beat about the bush pick up your ball and go end of
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy when did i complain about what we were talking about? pointing out that you are wrong and why isn't complaining...saying i can't understand what you are saying is not complaining...i am pointing out what you are doing. Again, we can start all over again, Palin wasn't the one doing the actual shooting and if she was, and in those rural areas, how is she wrong? i think that u still don't know why they have that policy...like i've stated, you are using emotion for your argument... : /
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 more times than even i can count but hey it was too fun....you were entertainment at end of the day proving your stupidity. i said agree to disagree and you refused you cant face your contradiction that you NEED me to agree. the meaning of agree to disagree is to accept that i disagree with you and i have already accepted that you disagree with me on the matter. I have already owned you. end of. and i dont need you to admit it or agreee. Now this is the last reply.contract worthy one. Bye
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz yep the only reason u came back as coz he keep it going the same with me
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz yes yes i was contradicting myself without...contradicting myself??? Btw, i am still waiting for you to show me where exactly i contradicted myself...Yes i know the meaning but again, that would mean i agree with you on that...and i told you...I DON'T CARE LOL!!! It is w/e with me...i already proved you wrong on this subject. The only thing you "own" me is in lying...sorry i don't play that game. seriously, you are pathetic...
fbi10 4 months ago
all u have is name calling and the contradiction thing 2 go on with titch has all ready show u so but that u are beating around the bush
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy yet there was no contradiction LMAO!!!!
name calling was coming from everyone, stop acting like you're a victim...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 i know i am not a victim and i said all u have 2 go on is name calling ect u did read it did u
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy yes you are. now man up...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 how show me how
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AbaddonAndy "all u have is name calling and the contradiction thing 2 go on with titch has all ready show u so but that u are beating around the bush"
you're playing victim...stop bitching about name calling when you do it yourself...man the fuck up LOL
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 haha if that being a victim then u are way off all i was doing was point out that its ALL u have left ie show u 4 what u are victim haha
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy that's all you ever had! at least i backed my name calling up with facts YOU HAVE NOT...stop complaining and stop trying to be a victim...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 yeah whatever dude....i dont care about your case anymore :-p
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz apparently you do because you just can't let it go...how many times did you say you were done??
fbi10 4 months ago
respect and kindness 2 those that deserve it instead of love wasted on ingrates palin does not deserve it
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy she deserves respect and much more for what she's done for her state...
you, however, don't deserve shit...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 yet again if that all u have pick up your ball and go what has she does other then take crap and kill wolves and i dont deserve shit why would i wont shit i cant do anything with it ( see i can play this game 2 )
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AbaddonAndy ...see again, i don't understand what you are saying and if you don't know about her governorship...i think you are done...
fbi10 4 months ago
Minnesota or Michigan = bating and ignorant how coz she can get a way with killing wolves and i cant say i hope she dies i can say i have the right 2 say that so u have no leg 2 stand on with that 1 and she is not a govenor the vid we are on is about her not staying as govenor dont u watch the vid ? and her policy is what she think just coz he live in alaska dont me anything
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy wait a minute...she didn't kill wolves in those states LOL!!!! When you are calling someone a title that they once held like Governor or President, it's a term of respect...youre 21 u should know this shit...
She's from Alaska not Minnesota or Michigan...try again, you keep on failing...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 did i say that nope i did not if all u can do is beat around the bush then pick up your ball and go
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy "Minnesota or Michigan = bating and ignorant how coz she can get a way with killing wolves"
and what does that say??
fbi10 4 months ago
u keep up i am trying 2 get 2 the real point of the convo jackass your the 1 makeing it about alaska and yeah i KONW its called bating keep up ... LOL palin DONT = alaska its 2 do with what she thinks that it nothing moer u add in stuff that was not about that 2 make your self all good but its all a show
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy the real point of the convo from the beginning was your ignorant statement about Governor Palin and then you went on to talk about her policy on wolves...which is in ALASKA...not in Minnesota or Michigan
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 and again you are missing the point...if you didnt need me to agree with you you would have just agreed to disagree and left it but no...you alwayhs have to reply ...so...farewell :-)
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz no because i would agree now wouldn't i? so again, where is the contradiction? i don't need to agree with me or agree to disagree...i don't give a fuck LOL
fbi10 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy what r u saying??? LOL!!!
fbi10 4 months ago
i cant make it any moer dumber than that so if u dont get my point just say so coz its the same as titch from the start i might add
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
tho if wolves dont need 2 on the endangered list why do people ask us 2 save me that my point more dumb down 4 u easyer 2 understand now i was never on about alaska i was on about palin not a alaska palin does not = alaska
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy again, they aren't endangered in alaska, which was one of my points from the get go....you keep changing your mind and keep on saying well they are endangered in other states...that doesn't matter to me or this Palin hatred that you have going...LOL
fbi10 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy wolves in alaska aren't on the list....LOL!!!
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi110 the contradiction being that for some1 that doesnt need for me to agree you have now refused to agree to disagree 7 times now :-p
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz contradiction....?? again no LOL
" i don't need for you to agree with me or not."
It doesn't matter if i agree to disagree because I DON'T care what you think about any of this...meaning i don't need to agree with you on anything. My facts have proved me right while yours have done equally for me. Again, where is the contradictory? It would be contradictory if i said i agree to disagree and then just say no i don't agree to disagree, i would be contradicting what i've said...
fbi10 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Titchwolffenriz " the contradiction being that for some1 that doesnt need for me to agree you have now refused to agree to disagree "
Yes exactly, i don't need to agree on anything with you...that's the point...that's not a contradiction LOL!!!!!
fbi10 4 months ago
i all ready said i was not on about alaska haveing endangered wolves i was on about all other but alaska nice try there
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy "if your point wasn't about alaska, why mention Palin and hunting wolves...? My point this whole time was about Palin and wolves in ALASKA...no where else..."
In response to what you said that wolves are endangered species but i never argued the fact that they are endangered else where but they are NOT endangered in alaska, which was my point when he started that discussion. So now, why are changing your story ? lol!!!
fbi10 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy " I am not talking about Michigan, Minnesota or Wisconsin, i said in ALASKA....in the state of alaska they are NOT one the endangered species list."
-keep up...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 come on man...you're a "smart" guy...i dont care about your case anymore like i sad i know what i know lets just leave it at that..or cant you?
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz again, what contradiction? LOL
fbi10 4 months ago
ok i did not wont 2 do this but oh well 1 me and titch we both talking about the same thing u added in other stuff so we have 2 look throw all of it 2 titchs point still stand as the wolves are not the ones killing the mooses ect on mass people are 3 people kill moer mosse etc then any wolf 4 and hunting of wolves is wrong 5 if your agree on palin with it there u are dumb end off (tell me i misrepresen u there )
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy you were talking about wolves being endangered in alaska and you go to mention other states while i was saying that they aren't endangered in alaska...nice try.
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 actually i am baiting you very well :-) agree to disagree...you have stated already you dont NEED me to agree with you and yet you have refused to accept that 6 times now ...is there going to be a 7th now..let me look at my magic 8 ball...its says more than likely you have ignored the point that this is the main contradiction i was talking about and i have stated about an hour ago i dont care about your case anymore and i have stuck to that point by not mentioning it . agree to disagree?
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz what contradiction?
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 i didnt...i used your point against you to exploit your contradictory manners...cant you see im bating you? again..agree to disagree?
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz however you failed because my point wasn't to you but to your "mate" and how me and him were in fact talking about the wolves being NOT endangered species in Alaska...me and u were talking about something completely different...so again, you failed lol!!! youre doing a pretty poor job of "baiting...
fbi10 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz so again, where was the contradictory...???
fbi10 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy cool man i just want to see if my experiment here works...if he agrees i get what i want if he doesnt? then he just proves me right and if he doesnt respond? then he does us all a favour and takes his ignorance and ego elsewhere. it doesnt matter what he says or doesnt say now.
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@fbi10 i know what i know and you know what you know...again...agree to disagree?
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz now again, why did you lie about what i've said and misrepresent what i stated...??
now what is your beef with the policy that palin followed and what the new governor follows?
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 havent i told you i dont care about this erm...argument anymore? the only one continuing to bring it up is you..you say you dont NEED me to agree with you and yet when i said agree to disagree you have refused on no fewer than 5 occasions..that is a contradiction of major proportions. i know what i know and i dont care what your case is anymore. it is time to move on. it is done. All you are doing now is wasting your own time by typing pointless replies. its over.agree to disagree? :-)
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz again, you ignored what i said...why did you lie about what i said and misrepresent what i said? What did i contradict? You still FAILED to point that out and yet you still hold on to that like a child.
the only one that keeps on typing pointless replies is you...you failed to provide any sort of rebuttal then you ignore what i ask...why did you lie about what i said?
fbi10 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz just let it man all u should say 2 him is ok your right the world work 2 how u and palin see it happy now and let it go coz this is geting moer and moer pointless and time goes on let him have this 1 if need it that bad we know we looked at it and it have nothing 2 do with anything but ffs man let it go now ( bet he will say something 2 now )
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
coz your keep taling 2 me its called um civility *grins*
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@fbi10 yup and your articles are erm...not...biased...i told you i dont care anymore..from what i know my facts are right and from what you know your facts are right...i am willing to let it go i have just pointed out that you have contradicted yourself twice...agree to disagree...if you really dont need me to agree with you..
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz yes my articles aren't biased they talk about both sides...
where did i contradict myself?
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 i say again..agree to disagree?
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz again, you just lied to me....
My facts prove me right, your facts had nothing to do with this policy...move on...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 oh and i thought your point was about wolves in rural areas in alaska...you have used so called evidence stating that your concerns were rural areas of alaska not just alaska as a whole....bravo..once again you have just contradicted yourself twice in 5 minutes
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz "when your facts are about alaska in general and not the rural areas where the hunting happens and that's what we've been talking about, they really don't matter"
When you talk about alaska in general and not the rural areas where the hunting happens, your so called facts dont represent or debunk anything i've said...yes my points were about the rural areas...where did i contradict myself? you seem to use that word a lot, do u know what means ?? lol...again caught u lying...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 u still reply why (dont answer it )
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy why do YOU still reply?? LOL!!!!
fbi10 4 months ago
ok 1 more time her policy on wolf killing is pointless and IF some1 agrees wher her on it then i hope they die . palin does not = alaska nor do wolves now let it go
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy and again, it isn't pointless...yes let it go, you're wrong...
fbi10 4 months ago
and about what i just said its me not careing so u need 2 leaern a thing or 2 now stop with the pointless come backs there geting u nowhere
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy if your point wasn't about Palin and alaska/wolves why mention her and the policy...?
fbi10 4 months ago
see u just had 2 come back with some thing
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@fbi10 my point was not about alaska but whatever your right ect ect ect your no better then a fundamental christian like titch said we dont care now but i do know this your will have somethng 2 say 2 it i give u 5 mins
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy if your point wasn't about alaska, why mention Palin and hunting wolves...? My point this whole time was about Palin and wolves in ALASKA...no where else...
fbi10 4 months ago
Titchwolffenriz all he does is say its not proof whne it is hell i look at he wet add that he show us wikianswer and it show nothing about where palin did or did say it and i used the same 1 wikianswer and geuss what wolves are on the list so what is it are they on the list coz the wet add say so or did palin say thos thing
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy i dont know man im not even going to humour him anymore.....he so NEEDS us to agree with him...hes an attention feeder...and a fucking mouth breeder thats doin nothing but sucking up bandwidth
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy it's not proof of anything because it doesn't talk about what we were originally talking about...it's simple, no?
wolves are on the endangered species list for alaska, yes or no?
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 like i said..humans have legs for travelling...moving to other areas...ands humanity has hunted moose as much as wolves have so none of their reasons can possibly be justified. My documentaries gave you all that you need and yet you are so unwilling to admit it like an attention seeking ass whore. you seriously need to get laid soon. now i say for the last time..cos now i dont care anymore..AGREE to DISAGREE? show some balls...its way past time to move on...im going now 100% goodbye
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz your documentaries provided NOTHING on the subject of wolf hunting in rural areas....but my sources did. You were wrong...plain and simple. Yes move on and go to bed...
no not agree to disagree when the facts don't support any of your positions...good riddance...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 dude....you so need to get laid....im past the point of caring whos right and whos wrong...your proof is nothing more than humanity's excuse. i accept you believe what you are saying as right..i dont need you to agree with me..where as you NEED me to agree with you its getting ridiculous now.Get a hobby.
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz i don't need for you to agree with me or not...i know my facts are correct but you, who lies constantly about what i said or misrepresenting what my sources say is childish and sad. take responsibility of what you said and leave...go learn how to debate and take a course with your "mate" while you're at it....
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 yup and i know my facts are correct.
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz it's too bad that your facts aren't apart of our discussion in rural alaskan areas....lol!!!! come back when you learn a thing or 2...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 "if your point wasnt about alaska why mention palin and hunting wolves...? My point this whole time was about palin and wolves in ALASKA...no where else..." = contradiction
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz that wasn't towards you, that was towards your "mate" when he said " my point was not about alaska but whatever your right ect ect ect" it wasn't towards you....
i didn't contradict anything but nice try buddy....
I know that was your point but you not knowing where these policies are used, that's your ignorance, not mine....
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 actually you did..you have stated time and time again that the rural areas are what your concerned with and you have stated in my documentaries i have shown you the rural areas arent mentioned in my documentaries even tho its ALASKA the rural areas are included it goes without saying...you stated they needed to be mentioned... then you say to andy you were talkin about ALASKA the entire time ...where was the rural areas in that point? *looks again* nope dont see it
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz no they are not included. Those rural areas are particular to the subject, they are different...it's completely different statistic and situation when it comes to those rural villages and an urban city. Your documentaries don't talk about it my sources do. It's in those rural areas where this policy is applied...not in the urban cities.
Me and Ab were talking about Alaska yes but alaskan wolves as they aren't on the endangered species list, he mentioned other states,
fbi10 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz cont: so that doesn't make sense and there are no contradictions....
We weren't talking about the rural areas because we were talking about the endangered species list...he gave me something else that had nothing to do with alaska. Me and you, however, were talking about the rural regions as to where the policy of hunting wolves is applied...completely different and more fail on your part...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10..why do you NEED me to agree with you?
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz when did i say that YOU need to agree with me? I said that i don't care if you agree or not, what i care about is when you openly lie about what i stated and misrepresent my position or what my sources says...
so again, why did you lie?
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 yup...whatever dude...for someone that doesnt need me to agree with tyou i already said agree to disagree you refused...you also replied my facts arent appart of our discussion when i said i know my facts are correct. So for someone that doesnt need me to agree with you you're sure persistant arent you? bravo...you sure proved your point there
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz when your facts are about alaska in general and not the rural areas where the hunting happens and that's what we've been talking about, they really don't matter...like i said, you choose to ignore my article that talks about this and you also chose to misrepresent my fact check article...you're confused...you seem obsessed...
fbi10 4 months ago
cont: also, your documentaries never talked about any of this...the only thing that came close was a bias video as to why it is wrong and they never talked about why it even started. You also lied when you said that the policy was cancelled and Palin reactivated...but continue to ignore it, i hope it makes you feel better...
fbi10 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy..he wont stop replying he keeps going on i keep replying because i "hate" to be proven wrong yet he keeps replying too...purely hypacritical
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz thank you for proving my points...good night and come again...
gg :)
fbi10 4 months ago
again if it proves nothing then way did i fine it oh that right 2 show u my point and fuck u oh i mean thx u 4 backing back with nothing now plz stop filling my email box with your bullshit titch have show u stuff i told au stuff if u dont wont 2 see then fine and i have looked at all your stuff and it have nothiing 2 do with what i was on about yet again your bypassed it time and time again so i ask u 1 moer time stop replying
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy all my sources did prove that i was correct and in what way did it prove otherwise? you "talk" in generalities and don't make sense half the time...LMAO!!!
fbi10 4 months ago
fuck me this guy still at it i came back 2 make sure my email was right and what do i find this guy still has nothing 2 show and the stuf he showed me was all bull titch doc talks about wolves being wolves that 1 of the point we are trying 2 make and btw dont even think about coz even if u are SOME how right i know u would say some thing like see i told u ect ect ect (dont say anything 2 me coz this message is not 4 u fbi10 )
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy your message didn't make any sense...and all my sources have just proven that i am right...urs doesn't even prove you right...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 and i already stated 1 will show you why the reasoning of hunting wolves is bullshit and thats because it mentions depopulating wolves to 80% is ridiculous cos they dont know the exact figures and the other? is about wolf behaviour and i stated that to prove that wolves attack 1 at a time. You bypassed that yet again to suit your needs.
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz again, i already proved that it is not bullshit because this has everything to do with having enough caribou/moose in certain areas without the population declining too much, which happens because of the overpopulation of wolves in certain areas. who says depopulating wolves by 80%?
yes and they attack herds and kill calves....again, you don't understand what you are arguing LOL!!!
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 i have told you time and time again that the article means nothing because it is humanity's excuse for killing. Besides if it was so bad in that area they couldve just moved o another area. Humanity has legs for travelling. And if the moose population has increased so much...why are they STILL hunting wolves? wouldnt it be time to leave them alone? and like i said they mate so they are ever increasing and wolves have natural rights. something you clearly dont understand. their world too.
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz did you not read the article? it said that they didn't reach their target area and it didn't say it grew a lot but none the less, the population has grown. Yes they have natural rights but so do we...
how many areas are people allowed to hunt for wolves again? what was that again?
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 you have gotten all that you need and it doesnt matter about the population of moose in mcgrath cos it was humanity hunting them constantly in the first place that got them in that mess idiot wolves follow their nature..humanity kills them for it..
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz "you have gotten all that you need" u've given me nothing thus far
" it doesnt matter about the population of moose in mcgrath "
it was an example: the moose population: "The agency said the moose population there has grown from 2,774 in 2004 to an estimated 5,500 moose now. The goal is to reach 6,000 to 8,000 moose" from that source i gave you..meaning, it's not 200 000 mooses in one area or a million caribou, these areas don't have all the resources in the world...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 still have 2 back back with some thing did not u your ego must be in pain or something coz its geting 2 the point where all u do is say shit about my spelling or that i dont make sense funny that i can read all my stuff and know what i am on about u have a hard time understanding what i say u must have a real heard time reading the stuff titch says (again stop taking 2 me and i will stop taking 2 u its that easy )
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy seriously...you don't make sense. And of course you understand what you are saying...YOU SAID IT lmao!!!!!! too easy....
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 i cant stand to be proven wrong? oh ho...funny how you responed by saying the documentaries prove nothing before watching them...yeah the time frame of the documentaries? 10-30 mins long...the time frime you responded? hmm about 5 mins max funny that...you didnt even look at the documentaries.
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz really then why have you kept on saying bye and you come back when i keep on proving you wrong, cry baby?
You have given me nothing on this subject, no documentaries that support your claim...nothing. Yes i have, i already seen both of them, one isn't about alaska and the other doesn't talk about the rural areas but alaska in general. So again, WHAT documentary did you see that talks about this stuff???
fbi10 4 months ago
cont: btw, did you look at the article i cited awhile ago?
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 of course you would say that it does nothing to address what you stated..because it doesnt need to..IT goes without saying...it doesnt need to...it doesnt need to spell it out for anyone because its not a documentary for confused children...it wont carry youyou have been given all the proof you need...no more no less. adios.
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz it doesn't and it needs to be said, idiot LMAO!!!
you gave me no proof and just provided my point. Good riddance but i know you can't stand to be proven wrong...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 i didnt fail to answer it..i chose not to cos it doesnt relate to anything but your own benefit of reasoning. And i didnt say it talked about rural ares. i said it talked about Alaska in the forms of every area of alaska..it doesnt mention rural areas cos it goes without saying that they are included dumbass.
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz yes you chose not to which means you failed to answer it. I am not talking about Alaska in general, this policy is only activated in the rural areas that's why it is important to not talk in generalities...no they aren't included, swamp insect. It's a totally different thing...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 so that being all im going to say farewell.and so long..idiot
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@fbi10 Wolf.....hunting...tactics there it is spaced out so you can read it clearly this time and you have just proved my point...any certifiable proof i give you you will not agree to it simply cos it doesnt work to your favour and your link states the 1 million caribou that are still there..its clear as day....what you dont realise is the documentaries cover all of alaska..it doesnt NEED to mention rural..i told you..humanity always does anything to keep up appearances they need to justify it!
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz by nationa geographic and again, they don't talk about wolves in the rural areas in alaska...what documentary did you watch that talks about it...???
1 million in general or in the rural areas? answer the question?
what documentary covered all of alaska that you watched and that they talk about the rural areas?
what is the population of moose in the rural area of McGrath??
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 if this isnt enough for you i dont know what is type in the last wild wolves in youtube that will show you wolf behaviour..NOTHING to do with rural areas but it will show you what you disagreed with earlier that wolves dont take 1 at a time..they take the weakest of the herd to feed themselves..and they also do that to keep the species of caribou strong. imagine that. But as for rural areas? sarah palin isnt authorising it in rural ares
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz we were never talking about wolves in general but wolves in the rural areas where the population control of wolves is happening...it has EVERYTHING to do with this because you both addressed the hunting of wolves without knowing the facts. You've been driven by emotion and blinded by facts. Sarah Palin did authorize it in rural areas but it didn't start with Palin but with the previous governor. I never aruged about how wolves hunt but i did say that in those rural areas
fbi10 4 months ago
cont. "argued"....but i did say that in those rural areas that the overpopulation of wolves were declining the population of caribou/moose in low numbers that were dangerous...that's it. I asked you for the documentary in where you told me they talked about wolves in alaska in the rural areas but you didn't show me...you lied. Plain and simple...
again, what was the population of the moose in the rura area of McGrath compared to now...???
u failed to answer this question...
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 yes and it was cancelled before sarah palin..she reactivated it dumbass. and these documentaries dont need to mention rural areas cos when they talk about alaska cos it goes without saying that when they say alaska they mean Alaska..the rural areas INCLUDED dumbass
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz no it was never cancelled dumb ass but she did support it...
Rural areas are different, idiot. Again, what was the population of moose in McGarth before the policy?
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10also im going to give you another documentary of the reasoning on your sites excuse for wolf hunting in alaska is bullshit. it is caled the truth about aerial hunting of wolves in alaska. your idiotic reasoning about rural areas is bullshit cos 1. no1 mentioned it before you..we were talking about sarah palins policy of it. and 2. this documentary is relating to your site.if it is not enough for you? you're moronic
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz yes and that is by a wildlife agency...nothing to do with my statistics that i got from the alaskan government...
1 i mentioned because it has everything to do with the policy that Governor Palin enforced
2 your documentary does nothing to address what i stated....
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 oh haha haha haha bullshit
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
u know what fuck this guy 2 easy yeah it would be if he know some thing 4 all thos who will see this my points are as ( look 4 them it not hard ) btw fbi10 if your like what palin and other have said about wolves then i hope u meet a wolf 1 day and see 4 your self
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy i love wolves and i have seen and met them...but you have yet to provide me with anything matter of fact you provided me with links that actually help me...thank you
fuck me? no, i don't swing that way...why don't you go see titch, your "mate" about that....
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 1. i have already stated that the wolf documentaries more than say enough about why the wolves arent a danger to caribou population in alaska
2. i have sent you a link of the reasoning behind the decrease of caribou in alaska
3. i have a feeling that once again you will claim that any certifiable proof i give you is non conclusive as it wouldnt work in your favour. so long.
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz 1 which documentary?
2. not in the rural areas...i've sent you a link to an article that talk about that....did you look at it?
3. you have not given me anything that is valuable to our conversation...you're a dumb ass...LOL
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 we where not on about alaske we on about what wolves do when they hunt they only kill 1 not 30 or whatwever
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy no we were talking about the policy in Alaska that permits citizens to decline the wolf population in certain areas. Not wolves in general. This is a video about Governor Palin and the fact that she supported that policy created in 2003. This wasn't about wolves in general. You started with that filth that Palin is an idiot and she deserves to die, w/e the fuck you said, because she supports hunting wolves but IN alaska...where they aren't endangered. LOL!!!
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 my point is there on the list i have never said that i was just talking about alaska i was talking about all over if u cant see that then there some thing wrong with u
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy i stated from the beginning that wolves in ALASKA aren't on the endangered species list...i never said anything otherwise....
thank you for proving that you 2 don't know anything....
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 put wolf hunting tactics in youtube
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy by National Geographic? Yea like i thought, it doesn't talk about anything in alaska or the situation in the rural areas that you 2 idiots claim to know...in fact, it talks about the grey wolves in Yellowstone park...no where near alaska : / and they are hunting Elk...thank you for proving my point....
fbi10 4 months ago
!fbi10 With the announcement last week that wolves in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin could be off the endangered species list by the end of the year, the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) moved one step closer to putting the state's Wolf Management Plan into action and managing wolves in a scientifically and socially acceptable way. there still on the list right now (may 19 2011)
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy I am not talking about Michigan, Minnesota or Wisconsin, i said in ALASKA....in the state of alaska they are NOT one the endangered species list.
Whoa...just whoa you both don't understand english....LOL!!!!
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 told u STILL looking ie have not seen it yet there are a lot or stuff on youtube u know and on the net
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AbaddonAndy i am just asking you for the documentary that YOU watched....
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 u know what if your 2 lazy 2 look it dont both with it then ( and i am still looking be4 u say anything )
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy provide me with a link...
and where is that documentary u were talking about ?
fbi10 4 months ago
@fbi10 ok dipshit this is the last time i do this...www2.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF4/427.html heres the link about why the decrease of caribou in alaska..... you will notice that not once is wolves mentioned...humanity and firearms however are mentioned...there is also wolf hunting tactics in youtube to type and the last wild wolves in youtube theres also many others that if need be will be linked to you if you really are this retarded. enjoy.
Titchwolffenriz 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz again, they aren't talking about the rural areas but alaska in GENERAL...this was never about in general but in the rural areas...which i stated from the beginning and yet you continue to ignore. My link that i provided earlier only proves that i am correct and also the article i cited 45 or so minutes ago. You are talking about in general and i am not...alaska is the biggest state in the USA...learn what's the difference between rural and cities, and then move on...you're done
fbi10 4 months ago
cont btw that article is from 1980...try to get a little up to date and also WHAT DOCUMENTARY DID YOU WATCH THAT TALKS ABOUT ALASKA IN THE RURAL AREAS AND WOLVES??? LMAO!!!!!!! this is too easy...
fbi10 4 months ago
@Titchwolffenriz thx u titch this guy like 2 beat around the bush do he i have made my points have made your point 2 him and all he has is stuff that come out in 2009 all i ask is 4 some thing of 2010 or 2011
AbaddonAndy 4 months ago
@AbaddonAndy i have...why do you choose to ignore the facts?
fbi10 4 months ago