There must be a valid Pope somewhere, but it isn't Benedict XVI. The double standards of FssPX can not be maintained for very long. It's either you accept the vatican II anti-Council, her anti-Pope's, and novus ordo anti-Liturgy, or you stay with the teachings and practises of the Catholic Church, no matter how small that group of believers has become. I hold the position that Siri was the last known Pope, and he died in 1989.
@SwordsmanOfFaith Recognition means little. When Paul VI said what he said, there was no question as to whether or not Abp. Lefebvre recognized him as pope. Recognition wasn't at issue. The SSPX positions concerning Vatican II, the Novus Ordo, the post-conciliar reforms was at issue. Once again, recognition means little now, as it meant nothing when Paul VI said what he said.
@SwordsmanOfFaith Since when did anyone get to negotiate with the Vicar? The SSPX "recognizes" Benedict XVI as such. Negotiations with the Pontiff? Over what? An ecumenical council approved of by the Fathers, promulgated by one they recognize as pope? A liturgy promulgated by one they recognize as pope? If he is the pope, they must submit. Bottom line. There is no such thing as negotiations. No such thing at all.
@SwordsmanOfFaith I am quite familiar with the SSPV's position regarding the Thuc-line and the CMRI. I am quite familiar with Bishop Kelly's arguments against them. I disagree with his reasoning, siding with Fr. Cekada, Fr. Vaillancourt, Bishop Dolan, Rama Coomaraswamy, and others. While I have respect for the SSPV and have friends who receive sacraments at their chapels, I strongly disagree with their position concerning our priests and bishops.
I'm not sure what the motive of this video is. Is it aimed at members of the Society of St. Piux X who believe that Rome still considers them in full communion?
Yes, this is for people who say they are in communion with Rome, but who go to unauthorized Masses where the diocesan bishop has declared their Mass and Sacraments illicit. This would include the SSPX, and so-called independent chapels. Worse yet, they attack sedes for not being in communion with the Vatican II popes. This is blatant hypocrisy.
There must be a valid Pope somewhere, but it isn't Benedict XVI. The double standards of FssPX can not be maintained for very long. It's either you accept the vatican II anti-Council, her anti-Pope's, and novus ordo anti-Liturgy, or you stay with the teachings and practises of the Catholic Church, no matter how small that group of believers has become. I hold the position that Siri was the last known Pope, and he died in 1989.
rooizilver 10 months ago
Hear that?........it's the sound of no one giving a shit.
Abr022575 11 months ago
fucker
NationalEvent12 1 year ago
The SSPX recognizes Pope Benedict XVI as a true Pope. The SSPX also has reconciliation talks with the Holy See.
You as a Sedevacantist are better off with the SSPV.
SwordsmanOfFaith 1 year ago 3
@SwordsmanOfFaith Recognition means little. When Paul VI said what he said, there was no question as to whether or not Abp. Lefebvre recognized him as pope. Recognition wasn't at issue. The SSPX positions concerning Vatican II, the Novus Ordo, the post-conciliar reforms was at issue. Once again, recognition means little now, as it meant nothing when Paul VI said what he said.
Reconciliation implies what?
paleocrat 1 year ago
@SwordsmanOfFaith Since when did anyone get to negotiate with the Vicar? The SSPX "recognizes" Benedict XVI as such. Negotiations with the Pontiff? Over what? An ecumenical council approved of by the Fathers, promulgated by one they recognize as pope? A liturgy promulgated by one they recognize as pope? If he is the pope, they must submit. Bottom line. There is no such thing as negotiations. No such thing at all.
paleocrat 1 year ago
@SwordsmanOfFaith I am quite familiar with the SSPV's position regarding the Thuc-line and the CMRI. I am quite familiar with Bishop Kelly's arguments against them. I disagree with his reasoning, siding with Fr. Cekada, Fr. Vaillancourt, Bishop Dolan, Rama Coomaraswamy, and others. While I have respect for the SSPV and have friends who receive sacraments at their chapels, I strongly disagree with their position concerning our priests and bishops.
paleocrat 1 year ago
The SSPX recognizes Pope Benedict XVI as a true Pope. The SSPX also has reconciliation talks with the Holy See.
You as a Sedevacantist are better off with the SSPV.
SwordsmanOfFaith 1 year ago
Unsubscribed.
blackthorne00 1 year ago
youtbube keeps changing their format to be worse and worse
OneTrueChurch 1 year ago
Comment removed
BaronGrackle 1 year ago
Comment removed
BaronGrackle 1 year ago
Comment removed
BaronGrackle 1 year ago
I'm not sure what the motive of this video is. Is it aimed at members of the Society of St. Piux X who believe that Rome still considers them in full communion?
BaronGrackle 1 year ago
Ugh... I do so hate this new Youtube format.
BaronGrackle 1 year ago
@BaronGrackle I hate the new format too.
Yes, this is for people who say they are in communion with Rome, but who go to unauthorized Masses where the diocesan bishop has declared their Mass and Sacraments illicit. This would include the SSPX, and so-called independent chapels. Worse yet, they attack sedes for not being in communion with the Vatican II popes. This is blatant hypocrisy.
paleocrat 1 year ago
@paleocrat Agreed.
BaronGrackle 1 year ago