a) Wapner returns for this boring case over old shoes.
b) The plantiff's highlight for his life is a 15 minute case with Wapner. I wonder if he'll still be sitting in the same shitty booth with old shoes in another 8 years' time.
Normally a special.appearance means the judge is in properia persona. Well guess what? He has taken an oath in office. He cant be in properia persona. I just dont get it?
Why is this country so sue crazy. People sue others for the supidest things. That was a waste of time and energy, I think he just sucked another 90 years out of the judge, I would have slapped him. And why was he suein for $2000, emtional distress???? Did he loose sleep over not being able to keep his shoes for his whole life? I think he wanted to pass those shoes down to his grandkids!
I HATE Harvey - he mentioned THREE times in 10 minutes that he worked with judge Wapner, we get it, you're a leech...and Judge Wapner is only 30 years old, but Harvey sucked the life out of him and put it in his damn water bottle...
This is my new favourite TV show. Not too sure where the claim for $2000 came from. I love the way the guy was happy he won when he was only awarded $50! Its a shame the Judge Wapner didn't bring that part up.
Awesome. It was good to see Judge Joseph Wapner once again. May 'The People's Court' live on and inspire us to not take the law to our own hands but to take the law to court. Thanks for posting!
The plaintiff says he never had a single complaint- that includes the defendant. Why didn't the defendant complain or warn the plaintiff? No, he just threw away the shoes. That's ridiculous behaviour.
if it clearly states in the handbook no personal items are to be left in the booth. then thats that. plain and simple. it doesnt matter if no one ever said anything about it before. its a rule. and the judge didnt ask to see the paper the defendant had stating that and the bailiff made no move to take them to the judge. hmmm....fishy?
Im sure wapner was thrilled to come outta retirement and preside over this case. Watching 2 losers complain about $50 shoes must have really been a thrilling moment for him in his last case ever.
I just want to say that Judge Wapner's decision was wrong. It was in the hand book not to leave your personal belongings in your booth. The fact that he got away with it for 7 years means nothing because it is in the handbook. The reprimands the guy received from work were also wrong because again, it's in the hand book but out of repect for his co-worker, he should have just asked him to please remove his shoes at the end of the shift and from that point followed chain of command to remedy.
HAHAHA this really is american cheese at its finest. only in america will a country make a mockery of its justice system. Its all for ratings, no other reasin to broadcast court houses. no wonder everyone laughs at dumb stupid americans!!!!
Who cares if it is 5000+$ shoes or a pair of Vans. Either way, clean up after yourself! And the defendant and the plantiff are both to blame. The defendant should not have touched his stuff even though it was in his way, and the plantiff should not have left them there in the first place. Rules are Rules.
that's bullshit...he put the excuse thath e worked for like 7 years or something? who gives a shit..the guy in the blue shirt says they can't leae anything over there so he shouldn't have to pay shit. i disagree with the judge.
Wapner is great, but I disagree with his ruling once again...the plaintiff was NEGLIGENT by chronically leaving personal property in an area easily accessible by other employees. The defendant should have prevailed.
He's talking about "home training" because that guy touched his stuff. If he had home training he wouldn't be leaving his $hit behind in the work booth.Oy!
Cute plaintiff, nice looking. But it really wasnt very clear what happened to the shoes. Did they just stayed outside until somebody picked them up? I would have put them in a bag, sealed it, and/ or told the plaintiff or the supervisor about the situation. Some details just werent analised well in both parties arguments. But if the defendant put them outside and forgot about them, then i guess he didnt do the right thing. Too big a show for some old shoes, i guess.
@otirudam Yes, you're right -- it wasn't analyzed enough. I'm surprised that Wapner didn't ask him why he left them outside, when he already said that he usually put them back in the booth when he left work.
hahaha u kidding me? u took sum1 to court over a pair of shoes. How about i just punch you in the face for losing my expensive shoes and we call it even.
"JW contributed to the American public, understanding American law just as much as just anybody..."
Maybe I'm not getting it, but doesn't this mean that JW would understand law as much as the average Joe? The way he worded sounds like an insult more than a compliment.
What a total waste of time, suing someone for 4 year old pair of shoes. If I was the judge I would of awarded him 10$. Go buy a double down at KFC and move on with your life. And I can't believe vindicated the P looked at the end. Big f'ing deal.
These shoes have been worn 8 hours a day 5(?) days a week for 4 years... of course they'd fucking stink. I don't see how that was any issue of debate.
I love Judge Marilyn Milian, she's so pretty and firey, and I also loved Judge Wapner and would love it if you posted some of his old shows. Judge Judy I don't love so much. The People's Court's people are much better. :)
Completely and utterly the wrong ruling. If it is a written rule that no personal belongings are to be left in the booth subsequent to your shift then the fact that they were removed on the grounds of the workplace being effected by the action of breaking said rule, it is justified.
@JessOnTheRun OMG! I truly hope English is not your first language (and any due apologies are given to those for whom English is their second language).Your spelling is beyond description;so bad,in fact,that your grammar can not receive comment.Translating your mess into some semblance cannot be done.Is there no bound on stupidity? No limit past which the human brain must ascend to be considered part of a civilized being? Apparently not. Thanks for the supremely negative score, it made my day.
@bringbkth90s: where exactly do you see misspelling?
You cant be serious about this, being that you spell civilised incorrectly... hate to inform you my uneducated, lower middle class, blue collar friend... but the world learns and speaks British English... American english is generally mocked & laughed over.
& u talk of grammar? re-read your menagerie of illogical conclusions.LOL... know what IRONY is? Because your post was a text book example.
@JessOnTheRun OMG! I truly hope English is not your first language (and any due apologies are given to those for whom English is their second language).Your spelling is beyond description;so bad,in fact,that your grammar can not receive comment.Translating your mess into some semblance cannot be done.Is there no bound on stupidity? No limit past which the human brain must ascend to be considered part of a civilized being? Apparently not. Thanks for the supremely negative score, it made my day.
I really don't see how the defendant was at fault in this case. there there was a standing policy pertaining to said work environment, it should've been a clear judgement from the start.
It was indeed an thrill to see His Honor Judge Wapner on the bench again! When my neice was little she used to call him Pa Pa Whopper LOL! She is 30 now and was almost in tears to see him again on the show.
Yay for stupid American "reality tv" shows. For the plaintiff? Really? If there's a fucking policy that says not to leave your shit at work, you don't leave your shit at work, plain and simple. Any judge with a brain would have ruled in the Defendant's favor.
The defendent shouldn't have put the shoes outside so somebody could take them. He should have told the plaintiff that they were stinking up the place and the plaintiff should take them with him. But come on he was suing $2,000 for a pair of shoes!!!! He only got $50. lol!
This guy comes out talking about home training and what mothers teach... well my mother teaches me not to leave my crap all over the place. take your 4 year old shoes home. This case was stupip Wapner should be suing them after this mess
Hey Peoples court...thanks so much for posting this case. Im an avid People's Court Fan and always record the show....today I wanted to make sure that I captured the show but for whatever reason tape didn't roll!!! Luckily, thanks to you I got to see this case with legendary Judge Wapner.. Thanks for putting your time into this for us hard-core fanatics out there!!!!
What a lame case; the plaintiff was obviously exagerrating the situation. Him working in a place for however many years doesn't excuse him from breaking policy, either. I don't think he deserved anything.
The defendant lost the case for himself by volunteering that information at the end that the company issued a reprimand for moving the shoes - which proved the plaintiff's case that him personally moving the shoes like that was improper conduct.
Wow. I mean wow.
a) Wapner returns for this boring case over old shoes.
b) The plantiff's highlight for his life is a 15 minute case with Wapner. I wonder if he'll still be sitting in the same shitty booth with old shoes in another 8 years' time.
elwyn5150 2 weeks ago
those boobs on that woman .
MILF!
xShiraYuikix 4 weeks ago
50 dollars. Our tax dollars at work people.
SkavenUK 1 month ago
this was a waste of time
josh45331 1 month ago
$50? You go to court for $50?
Really?
darron13 1 month ago
"...You were doing great 'till you mentioned that bit of information." Layman's terms, "Thanks for the precedence you fool." lol
tharpippens 1 month ago
why did he ask for $2000? LOL
stoicblitzer 1 month ago
That blond chick has nice tits
dragonbut 1 month ago
Normally a special.appearance means the judge is in properia persona. Well guess what? He has taken an oath in office. He cant be in properia persona. I just dont get it?
myjuicemike 1 month ago
who the fricken blonde outside by the dick commentator!!! Hot in her white bra!!!
915buck 2 months ago
He blew his case when he mentioend his repremand LOL should have kept quiet
NativePrairieWolf 2 months ago
@NativePrairieWolf - I wonder if he would have won if he didn't say that.
Zeeboe 2 months ago
Who wants to smell somebody's nasty, stinky shoes!
PancakeSally 2 months ago 2
The sign says 'marilyn millian' XD
allogicid 2 months ago
if i were going to bang that blonde behind harvey, i would need her to have to paperbags over the head
HackSlashKill 2 months ago
It's a louder gavel than he used to have. You could barely hear his gavel in the old days.
gregersen80015 2 months ago
The judges on The People's Court were Wapner, Ed Koch, and now Milian, correct? Or am I forgetting anyone?
RBNightlinger 3 months ago
@RBNightlinger Judge Judy's husband,Jerry Sheindlan.
NaturallyKimberly 3 months ago
Going to court over $50? What a waste of time...
SIM2402 3 months ago
@SIM2402 He sued for $2000, but Judge Wapner reduced it.
neacej1 2 months ago
Poor old man Wapner is grumbling, "I'm too old for this garbage". Punk kids wasting my time over a pair of shoes. This is why he retired.
sinnersavedbygrace7 3 months ago 8
Plaintiff was a douchebag ... I bet he would go home feeling like a champ if he had won $5 ... what a piece of shit.
Byron10301 3 months ago
they pay like $200 to come on this show. lolz, he is so happy he won $50
marcmody 3 months ago
@marcmody
They're paid to go on the show, and the show also pays the winning party on behalf of the losing party.
codefusions 3 months ago
youve been there for more than 7 years and you still have that accent?
FrostMan92 3 months ago
except..... it said on the employee memo that you can't leave your personal belongings... so.... that's cool...
BluePhantomCavalier 3 months ago
His mama teach him, $50 stinking shoe, go ask for 2000
watanabe757 3 months ago 2
Curious, the litigant that came after this Judge. Was it Judge Marilyn of Wapner?
sgal88 4 months ago
luv Wapner
3xpens1v3 4 months ago
how come he sue for 2000$? the shoes aint worth a 10th of it!!
Arthdan94 4 months ago
all this shit over $50
DemEazy 4 months ago
It would be so nice if they could get all the People's Court judges together for one show.
Great seeing Judge Wapner again.
gldnglow 4 months ago
the plaintiff was asking for TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS !!!
Glad Wapner saw thru his n1gg3r shit.
power2084 5 months ago
2:26
Sportswhisperer 5 months ago
Judge Wapner is still a cutie. He looks so dignified, reminds me of George Washington. lol
denalaurens 5 months ago
WOW FAIL HE WANTED 2000 dollars for dumb shoes?
1991doomsday 7 months ago
this case was extraordinarily dull. JM is much more lively than that old guy.
ShinyGlitterDoll 7 months ago
defendent was like thank you now go die
ilili2003ilili 7 months ago in playlist Courtroom Dramas
harvey levin should have been in the holocaust.
fran9860 7 months ago
@fran9860 and you should have been hitler's dick holder.
tavolo22 7 months ago
@tavolo22 do you want to fuck my dookie hole?
fran9860 7 months ago
I thought the company rules stated employees weren't to leave personal items in the booth. So why was the defendant reprimanded?
Mojosbigstick 7 months ago
my mom also told me not to leave my stuff at someones place cause something could happen to them...........i gues his mom never told him that
LINKTheReaper 7 months ago
Wapner goes back into freezing after this case. That's how he stays alive. :)
WickedJargon 8 months ago 29
@WickedJargon Car-Bo-Nyte!
tehdouglas1 4 months ago
The judge does NOT look 90!
wangis 8 months ago
@potterfanatic2 wapner once made a ruling for 7 dollars on the people court... a kid sued a store for no refund on batteries that were dead.
BIGRED224FOREVER 8 months ago
Why is this country so sue crazy. People sue others for the supidest things. That was a waste of time and energy, I think he just sucked another 90 years out of the judge, I would have slapped him. And why was he suein for $2000, emtional distress???? Did he loose sleep over not being able to keep his shoes for his whole life? I think he wanted to pass those shoes down to his grandkids!
MrJlo87 8 months ago
I HATE Harvey - he mentioned THREE times in 10 minutes that he worked with judge Wapner, we get it, you're a leech...and Judge Wapner is only 30 years old, but Harvey sucked the life out of him and put it in his damn water bottle...
Playwithfireflies 8 months ago
The plaintiff shouldn't be awarded a dollar, FOUR YEAR OLD SHOES that were $130.00 new? He got his money's worth of wear out of them...
Playwithfireflies 8 months ago
"do your feet stink?" LOL... best line
lalea72pop 8 months ago
@lalea72pop I agree LOL!
golga14 8 months ago
This is my new favourite TV show. Not too sure where the claim for $2000 came from. I love the way the guy was happy he won when he was only awarded $50! Its a shame the Judge Wapner didn't bring that part up.
tom101177 8 months ago
Awesome. It was good to see Judge Joseph Wapner once again. May 'The People's Court' live on and inspire us to not take the law to our own hands but to take the law to court. Thanks for posting!
dondonp12004 9 months ago
It was good to see Mr Wapner again!!!
shade421 9 months ago
this is something their boss could handle and someone this petty and irresponsible shouldn't keep his job.
Genin99 9 months ago
this is so pathetic...$50. my god. what a waste of time and dignity.
antmlova1 9 months ago
Home training- it's lovely concept. Wish more people trained their kids.
MyLatestEscape 9 months ago
They went to court over a pair of shoes? Pathetic.
samsticka 10 months ago
I almost had tears watching. Judge Wapner and Judge Milian make a great team.
skingpinspin 10 months ago 2
I agree with Judge.
The plaintiff says he never had a single complaint- that includes the defendant. Why didn't the defendant complain or warn the plaintiff? No, he just threw away the shoes. That's ridiculous behaviour.
smaginn 10 months ago 2
if it clearly states in the handbook no personal items are to be left in the booth. then thats that. plain and simple. it doesnt matter if no one ever said anything about it before. its a rule. and the judge didnt ask to see the paper the defendant had stating that and the bailiff made no move to take them to the judge. hmmm....fishy?
greenlee7smythe 11 months ago
Autistic savants LOVE this show.
CoolerKing37 11 months ago
$50? wow nice court case
flashkidx 11 months ago
Im sure wapner was thrilled to come outta retirement and preside over this case. Watching 2 losers complain about $50 shoes must have really been a thrilling moment for him in his last case ever.
TylerGDaniels 1 year ago 2
@potterfanatic2 Greedy people!!!! $50 helps support his habits!!
yursugarmyspice 1 year ago
I just want to say that Judge Wapner's decision was wrong. It was in the hand book not to leave your personal belongings in your booth. The fact that he got away with it for 7 years means nothing because it is in the handbook. The reprimands the guy received from work were also wrong because again, it's in the hand book but out of repect for his co-worker, he should have just asked him to please remove his shoes at the end of the shift and from that point followed chain of command to remedy.
yursugarmyspice 1 year ago
HAHAHA this really is american cheese at its finest. only in america will a country make a mockery of its justice system. Its all for ratings, no other reasin to broadcast court houses. no wonder everyone laughs at dumb stupid americans!!!!
ollyb111 1 year ago
is judge Wapner Italian?
BillyBadAss53120 1 year ago
the WAP dropped the hammer!!!!!!!!!
REXFERAL59 1 year ago
older looking blonde behind harvey has a huge rack
REXFERAL59 1 year ago
THIS IS PATHETIC! WHY DID HE JUDGE A CASE OF SHOES?!?!?! Should have been something like armed robbery or something with meat! AGh!
LoveAddictREmix 1 year ago
Who cares if it is 5000+$ shoes or a pair of Vans. Either way, clean up after yourself! And the defendant and the plantiff are both to blame. The defendant should not have touched his stuff even though it was in his way, and the plantiff should not have left them there in the first place. Rules are Rules.
LoveAddictREmix 1 year ago
hes 90 yrs old and hes still putting up with shit from us littil kuntz lol
BIGM420ganja 1 year ago
damn just buy some new shoes come on man
kuriaki71 1 year ago
that's bullshit...he put the excuse thath e worked for like 7 years or something? who gives a shit..the guy in the blue shirt says they can't leae anything over there so he shouldn't have to pay shit. i disagree with the judge.
blackscent 1 year ago
Wapner is great, but I disagree with his ruling once again...the plaintiff was NEGLIGENT by chronically leaving personal property in an area easily accessible by other employees. The defendant should have prevailed.
happy543210 1 year ago
lol 50 bucks is hardly worth the time at all.
naughtynaez 1 year ago
I LOVED seeing this - Judge Wapner looks great & is still the best and always will be the original. He was always real and not ever over-the-top.
selmasoo 1 year ago 2
What a bunch of morons in the crowd.
buriedeternally 1 year ago
I remember watching Wapner and Doug Louwellin (sp) Let us not forget RUSTY the balif.... Brings back great memories....
courttube3 1 year ago
He's talking about "home training" because that guy touched his stuff. If he had home training he wouldn't be leaving his $hit behind in the work booth.Oy!
Michalbasavraham 1 year ago 3
What a bald-headed boobie. The plaintiff basically said "The new guy is an asshole." and then proved it.
IntoTheDarkWood 1 year ago
$50.00 jajajajajaja
ibuakeremi 1 year ago
Cute plaintiff, nice looking. But it really wasnt very clear what happened to the shoes. Did they just stayed outside until somebody picked them up? I would have put them in a bag, sealed it, and/ or told the plaintiff or the supervisor about the situation. Some details just werent analised well in both parties arguments. But if the defendant put them outside and forgot about them, then i guess he didnt do the right thing. Too big a show for some old shoes, i guess.
otirudam 1 year ago
@otirudam Yes, you're right -- it wasn't analyzed enough. I'm surprised that Wapner didn't ask him why he left them outside, when he already said that he usually put them back in the booth when he left work.
Also, I just have to say it: "DA BOOF!" LOL
Purushadasa 1 year ago
hahaha u kidding me? u took sum1 to court over a pair of shoes. How about i just punch you in the face for losing my expensive shoes and we call it even.
Bbfishman 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The guy blew it when he said he was reprimanded for touching another person's property. Wapner said so himself.
fbebeats 1 year ago
The guy blew it when he said he was reprimanded for touching another person's property. Wopner said so himself.
fbebeats 1 year ago
lol. a 50 dollar ruling
illuminatioracle 1 year ago
What the hell was this suposed to mean:
"JW contributed to the American public, understanding American law just as much as just anybody..."
Maybe I'm not getting it, but doesn't this mean that JW would understand law as much as the average Joe? The way he worded sounds like an insult more than a compliment.
TheMedievalNerd 1 year ago
@TheMedievalNerd I was very poorly worded, but what he meant to say was that JW helped the American public to increase their understanding of law.
Purushadasa 1 year ago
What a total waste of time, suing someone for 4 year old pair of shoes. If I was the judge I would of awarded him 10$. Go buy a double down at KFC and move on with your life. And I can't believe vindicated the P looked at the end. Big f'ing deal.
TheMedievalNerd 1 year ago
"do your feet stink"?
Diadematov 1 year ago
plaintiff is the loser of the case.
cw99900a 1 year ago 12
These shoes have been worn 8 hours a day 5(?) days a week for 4 years... of course they'd fucking stink. I don't see how that was any issue of debate.
Delphanious 1 year ago
Home Training??? NIGGA take your shit home.
Rickbetton 1 year ago
The plaintif's accent is fuckin annoying.
FromBrazilWithLove 1 year ago
@FromBrazilWithLove, Welcome to New York...
DONTHEMAGICWON 1 year ago
I love Judge Marilyn Milian, she's so pretty and firey, and I also loved Judge Wapner and would love it if you posted some of his old shows. Judge Judy I don't love so much. The People's Court's people are much better. :)
redenchilada 1 year ago
Completely and utterly the wrong ruling. If it is a written rule that no personal belongings are to be left in the booth subsequent to your shift then the fact that they were removed on the grounds of the workplace being effected by the action of breaking said rule, it is justified.
winnter211 1 year ago
wow Im in love with the blonde woman on the street. Beautiful.
ItsFrankieBoy 1 year ago
PS.. And yes i am black
bringbkth90s 1 year ago
Judge W may have been the start of this whole courtroom TV thing..but hes dull and slow now...God love him though.
MPL029 1 year ago
As Wapner leaves the bench, he mumbles to himself:
"People are fucking suing each other over a five year old pair of shoes. Now I remember why I quit this meaningless, boring job!".
CommentClown 1 year ago 2
dumb niggers only say clarence thomas, a sex offender... good job jungle bunnies... stupid, filthy members of a no good race.
JessOnTheRun 1 year ago
@JessOnTheRun OMG! I truly hope English is not your first language (and any due apologies are given to those for whom English is their second language).Your spelling is beyond description;so bad,in fact,that your grammar can not receive comment.Translating your mess into some semblance cannot be done.Is there no bound on stupidity? No limit past which the human brain must ascend to be considered part of a civilized being? Apparently not. Thanks for the supremely negative score, it made my day.
bringbkth90s 1 year ago
@bringbkth90s: where exactly do you see misspelling?
You cant be serious about this, being that you spell civilised incorrectly... hate to inform you my uneducated, lower middle class, blue collar friend... but the world learns and speaks British English... American english is generally mocked & laughed over.
& u talk of grammar? re-read your menagerie of illogical conclusions.LOL... know what IRONY is? Because your post was a text book example.
No wonder I make more money than you.
JessOnTheRun 1 year ago
ZING!
BAM!
destroyed, dismissed and disposed!
SLAP!
JessOnTheRun 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JessOnTheRun OMG! I truly hope English is not your first language (and any due apologies are given to those for whom English is their second language).Your spelling is beyond description;so bad,in fact,that your grammar can not receive comment.Translating your mess into some semblance cannot be done.Is there no bound on stupidity? No limit past which the human brain must ascend to be considered part of a civilized being? Apparently not. Thanks for the supremely negative score, it made my day.
bringbkth90s 1 year ago
@JessOnTheRun The white people couldn't name another single judge.
Bloodrozer 1 year ago
@Bloodrozer: because whites dont stand in front of judges like blacks and hispanics do.... LOL
ZING!
JessOnTheRun 1 year ago
this guy was a true legend. i remember watching him judge through out most of my teenage years
noreaga12326 1 year ago
Totally off subject: The blonde Harvey is interview in the gray shirt is SMOKING HOT!!!
gj804 1 year ago
I really don't see how the defendant was at fault in this case. there there was a standing policy pertaining to said work environment, it should've been a clear judgement from the start.
ImperialArmour 1 year ago
It was indeed an thrill to see His Honor Judge Wapner on the bench again! When my neice was little she used to call him Pa Pa Whopper LOL! She is 30 now and was almost in tears to see him again on the show.
Oreocremerocks 1 year ago
The plaintiff got a token $50. Despite the silliness of the case, in my opinion, it was cool to see Wapner in action again...
baba4ever 1 year ago
Yay for stupid American "reality tv" shows. For the plaintiff? Really? If there's a fucking policy that says not to leave your shit at work, you don't leave your shit at work, plain and simple. Any judge with a brain would have ruled in the Defendant's favor.
w0ahsz 1 year ago
$50? with no proof of how much he paid for those shoes?? he could of received them as a gift.
timeIezz 1 year ago
$50 is generous for those old shoes.
Tamaya42 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
american sure have retarded shows
SilverGunZoO 1 year ago
You sure write in retarded English, SG.
princetrumpet 1 year ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@princetrumpet My sentence was perfect, besides, I speak 4 languages, English is my least favorite, get a life !
SilverGunZoO 1 year ago
lol you started it, so u get a life :D
bakedpootetoo 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@princetrumpet I said the truth, usa has the most retarded shows I ever seen, I swear it's not racist but what I think.
SilverGunZoO 1 year ago
is that paul giamati
marklestat 1 year ago
I think the people's Court Should bring back Judge Shiendlin and Judge Koch for Special Appreance too.
snake5475 2 years ago 2
i agree
britneyslut 1 year ago
The guy who talks to them when they are done is the biggest dick ever! Everyone else on this show is cool except for him.
cupofjoe29 2 years ago
@Leabo90
Judge Judy = a poor man's Judge Wapner.
MaximRecoil 2 years ago
The defendent wasn't that much of a loser considering the plaintiff was seaking $2,000 and only got $50!
bandet888 2 years ago 30
@bandet888 $2000 damages on a $100 pair of shoes is wrong!
YodatheJedi12 1 year ago
@YodatheJedi12 You're right.
bandet888 1 year ago
@bandet888 werent they $130 shoes??
tyrehd 1 year ago
@tyrehd Yes, thew plaintiff did claim that the shoes cost $130.
Purushadasa 1 year ago
@bandet888 plaintiff doesn't seem to care
HWJASURY 1 year ago
@bandet888 he really annoyed me when his arguement was that the other guy was new, anmd everyone else just accepted his smelly shoes!
scrambledpenis 1 year ago
@bandet888 50$ poorer thts for sure. the black gut gv a huge owned to the donut
JVL8701 1 year ago
@bandet888 spoillleeeerrrrrrrrrrssssssssss
troglodyto 9 months ago
The defendent shouldn't have put the shoes outside so somebody could take them. He should have told the plaintiff that they were stinking up the place and the plaintiff should take them with him. But come on he was suing $2,000 for a pair of shoes!!!! He only got $50. lol!
bandet888 2 years ago
Why did that guy think he could get $2,000 for those shoes?
cantryss 2 years ago 3
nice rack on that one lady
a2ks2k 2 years ago
that case was pathetic! shoes
Miiiitch88 2 years ago 4
At 2:21 seconds...........lol argh righttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt!
metabo411 2 years ago
I think it's kind of disrespectful to give a legendary judge a $50 case over a pair of shoes that someone touched...
IveRuinedMyLIFE 2 years ago 8
I kinda think its fucked up he comes back and the only case he gets an argument over a stupid pair of shoes
Bloodshotbuddah 2 years ago 4
happy birthday and many more
123demaio 2 years ago
Judge Wapner looked great. I cannot believe he is 90 years old. Good Luck to him.
burbank 2 years ago 39
@burbank he's 90 he looks so long to be 90
fluteplaya22593 11 months ago
I remembered Judge Wapner beating up on the black people that came into his court back in the 80's.
YOURGODISNOWHERE 2 years ago
its not his feet that stink. he stinks.
ballrub 2 years ago
his feet probably stink
GlitterStar313 2 years ago
plaintiff sucks!
usa123here 2 years ago
50 dollas!!! YAAAAHHH
wait..
KarinMikazuki 2 years ago 2
Wapner was a sweet guy. Rarely got riled up. I like him.
mediacritic 2 years ago
i miss Judge Wapner. he is the best ever!!
SMSTERN2 2 years ago
lol waste money to get to this court worth $300 and then in and only get $ 50
lifeinthenfl 2 years ago
Its good to see him back on tv again.
JediMichael2003 2 years ago
Go Wapner! Haven't seen him in almost 16 years.
GameShowNetwork 2 years ago
Judge Wapner: My judgement is for the Plantiff for $50.00
Plantiff: YEAH!! I'm da KANG!! H-H-Ho'd up, ya On-uh. It almost sounded like you said fiddy bucks?!
Chaly2na 2 years ago 3
Thanks..so great to see Judge Wapner again! I watched him on PC when I was a child! Can't believe he is 90 years old!
Lauren80s 2 years ago 2
They are acting like JW is God... I respect the man, but come on, he is just a man...
pullum4545 2 years ago 2
Judge Wapner Rocks!
apprider 2 years ago
This guy comes out talking about home training and what mothers teach... well my mother teaches me not to leave my crap all over the place. take your 4 year old shoes home. This case was stupip Wapner should be suing them after this mess
floydma 2 years ago 2
Thanks! i love judge wapner
superoctobe 2 years ago
Hey Peoples court...thanks so much for posting this case. Im an avid People's Court Fan and always record the show....today I wanted to make sure that I captured the show but for whatever reason tape didn't roll!!! Luckily, thanks to you I got to see this case with legendary Judge Wapner.. Thanks for putting your time into this for us hard-core fanatics out there!!!!
jasonhpro 2 years ago 18
My pleasure! So glad I can do this for you all!
ThePeopleCourt 2 years ago 6
@ThePeopleCourt Do you really represent The People Court?
Bopkasen 1 year ago
@Bopkasen Nope; just a devout fan!
ThePeopleCourt 1 year ago
@ThePeopleCourt Ok. Good shows.
Bopkasen 1 year ago
Yes! Thank you thank you!
Dreamydeppmama 2 years ago
What a lame case; the plaintiff was obviously exagerrating the situation. Him working in a place for however many years doesn't excuse him from breaking policy, either. I don't think he deserved anything.
TheCandie87 2 years ago 4
The defendant lost the case for himself by volunteering that information at the end that the company issued a reprimand for moving the shoes - which proved the plaintiff's case that him personally moving the shoes like that was improper conduct.