The climate models are not actually models you know they are spherical crystal devices that when the climatologists hands are laid on them a swirling mist reveals what will be happening in the future
“I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !
“I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !
A survey carried out by the UK Royal Society found that in 2005 ExxonMobil distributed US$2.9 million to American groups that "misinformed the public about climate change," 39 of which "misrepresented the science of climate change by outright denial of the evidence".
PLEASE AMERICA, DO YOURSELF AND THE WOLRD A FAVOUR AND WAKE UP!
One thing you can be sure of in life, that is, if you are afraid of something it is because someone needs you to be in a state of fear whilst they rob you. Analyze your fears and how much money or health they may cost you. Climate change, AIDS, cancer, Al Quaeda, Avian flu, swine flu, etc. etc.. All bullshit,self fulfilling prophecies. The power of nightmares. Notice religion has a Devil? Religion wouldn't work without fear, that's why you can safely say that climate change is a religion.
Numerous posts on where is the credible proof to explain climate variation?
Well there is such proof but no one wants to listen. The results demonstrate an unassailable correlation with historic climate data and because the data can be calculated, the future climate patterns can also be calculated, a forecast for the next two decades is shown and we are in for a long cold spell in the Northern hemisphere.
The climate skeptic blogosphere has been quick to cherry pick certain snippets from the emails they claim show dissension within the climate science ranks. Multiple inquiries, while calling for more openness in data sharing, found no evidence of scientific misconduct on the part of the involved scientists. And new scientific assessments and studies have re-affirmed the Earth is warming and human activities play a key role.
They have been found cooking the books, [climate models] and this Professor still believe the ball shit. Should the government still have this man in a job.
They have been found cooking the books, [climate models] and this Professor still believe the ball shit. Should the government still have this man in a job.
@red88ization It's not. Check "Global warming" on wikipedia. There is international consensus. If you don't believe it: Watch the "HOME" movie. If you still don't care and can't see any impact, I can't do anything for you. Cheers.
Do you have the statistics (or have you interviewed all the scientists) so that you can speak with authority on whether or not there is IN FACT a "consensus" of scientists that believe in Global Warming? I already know the answer....
Anyone noticed they call it "climate change" instead of "global warming" now? COS ITS A FRAUD TO GET YOUR MONEY TO THE BANKSTERS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE!
The amount of stupid response to this video are amazing. If you want to debate climate change learn atmospheric physics. Otherwise you're just regurgitating what you've been told without the least bit of understanding.
InterGOVERNMENTAL panel ay? Earth may be warming 1.4 to 6.4 degrees over the next 100 years ay? Sea may rise as much as 22inches over the next hundred years IF warming continues ay? Is that what all this fuss is about, not exactly Armageddon is it? and for this they want a world tax?
By the way, the amount of heating is irrelevant. It is the rate of consequential environmental change due to this warming that is relevant. Given current science this overall change has more negative consequences for us human species than positive consequences. Given this scientific stance it makes sense to try to stop or, optimistically, reverse the cause of this global warming. Which is CO2.
@fudgedogbannana Well what you just stated means the end for most coastal cities around the world + some countries so yes actions is quite urgently needed. Curently coral reefs are dying these function as breeding site for a lot of spieces, these will disapear, what problems that will cause is more or less unknown. The effects on ecosystems is so vast that it is not possible to predict what will happen.hopefully not as bad as end Perm when rapidly 93% of all spices got extinct.
@Fyhrtheflame horsefeathers, the earth is already in a cooling trend, soon it will warm again before it starts to cool, warming and cooling is exactly what the earth does, build above sea level for the next hundred years if you want to but dont bullshit me into paying a world tax.
Didn't all IPCC assessments leading up to report 7 have a consensus man had nothing to do with global warming , Wasn't report 7 tampered with by a man called ben santa to make every one believe this last report was solid like this ignorant illusional man called Robert Watson proclaims ,he talks about precipitation ,dose he know those computer theory models don't do cloud they cant calc cloud ,cloud dose reflect up to 60% of sun rays, there for these fradulant models cant even factor in the sun.
"How can anyone say that the science is solid, when the raw data used has been destroyed and can never be verified?"
.
What raw data? And what is the siginificance of the raw data?
How about all other data? Is that out of synch? And if not, what is the estimate of the destroyed raw data in relation to the not destroyed raw data? In other words and again what would have been the significance of the destroyed raw data given the most deviated interpretations from the norm?
love him or hate him but there is one man that not one of the alarmists will debate on climate change Lord Christopher Monckton. just do a search listen to him. everything this man states is backed by facts
The bbc cant report on this fairly or be imparsial because they've invested millions of public and private money in carbon offsets. What I dont understand is if they say "Anthropogenic Global Warming" is caused by CO2 then cutting down on the CO2 would obviously cause "Anthropogenic Global Freezing" but waite I've read articles that have claimed the resent global cooling over the past fue years is due to global warming I there seems to be an active campaign to confuse the issue.
Brilliant, I am somewhat on the fence on this issue, but critical dabate like this is long overdue. I feel a big debate coming and look foward to seeing more like this one. Thank you very much for posting.
What exactly is Will Self trying to imply "u r being unnecessarily bullish Andrew and I wonder why"..who is the one with the vested interest here, the presenter or the guy who makes a living out of global warming?
@ryanrayonec They're called seasons, they're caused by the rotation of the earth and not the amount of carbon in the atmosphere! basicaly they say the reason why it's warm is down to "AGW" and the reason why it's cold is down to "AGW". some people belive that people are having more of an impact on the planet than what or sun and the freezing temperatures of space are having. the real issue should be about who is investing in this false eco-economy designed to make profits from us.
It's all good. I'm just sad were literally going backward in evolution. Who didn't read about people being killed for thinking the earth was round without feeling ashamed we were ever that naive and low as a people.
This has been flagged as spam show
The climate models are not actually models you know they are spherical crystal devices that when the climatologists hands are laid on them a swirling mist reveals what will be happening in the future
LordMonckton78 1 week ago
this guys a Professor? he can barely talk....
liberallunatic 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
From: Phil Jones
To: “Michael E. Mann”
Subject: HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004
“I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !
Cheers
Phil”
MrOTLChamp 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
From: Phil Jones
To: “Michael E. Mann”
Subject: HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004
“I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !
Cheers
Phil”
MrOTLChamp 1 week ago
Robert Watson is not very well read on this subjective, just a another big paying job for this global scam.
24017460 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A survey carried out by the UK Royal Society found that in 2005 ExxonMobil distributed US$2.9 million to American groups that "misinformed the public about climate change," 39 of which "misrepresented the science of climate change by outright denial of the evidence".
PLEASE AMERICA, DO YOURSELF AND THE WOLRD A FAVOUR AND WAKE UP!
gesehengehoert 1 month ago
One thing you can be sure of in life, that is, if you are afraid of something it is because someone needs you to be in a state of fear whilst they rob you. Analyze your fears and how much money or health they may cost you. Climate change, AIDS, cancer, Al Quaeda, Avian flu, swine flu, etc. etc.. All bullshit,self fulfilling prophecies. The power of nightmares. Notice religion has a Devil? Religion wouldn't work without fear, that's why you can safely say that climate change is a religion.
kaferere 1 month ago
8:15, "IPCC is peer reviewed by all governments of the world" so not reviewed by scientists then, just policy makers.
zzebowa 2 months ago 3
Numerous posts on where is the credible proof to explain climate variation?
Well there is such proof but no one wants to listen. The results demonstrate an unassailable correlation with historic climate data and because the data can be calculated, the future climate patterns can also be calculated, a forecast for the next two decades is shown and we are in for a long cold spell in the Northern hemisphere.
Google Solarchords and see for yourself.
howardsway782 3 months ago
The climate skeptic blogosphere has been quick to cherry pick certain snippets from the emails they claim show dissension within the climate science ranks. Multiple inquiries, while calling for more openness in data sharing, found no evidence of scientific misconduct on the part of the involved scientists. And new scientific assessments and studies have re-affirmed the Earth is warming and human activities play a key role.
checkyoursources 3 months ago
.....there is no evidence for CO2 warming
BTsmoke 3 months ago 2
And he worked for the World Bank!!!!!
ZiderParty 3 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
They have been found cooking the books, [climate models] and this Professor still believe the ball shit. Should the government still have this man in a job.
ZiderParty 3 months ago
They have been found cooking the books, [climate models] and this Professor still believe the ball shit. Should the government still have this man in a job.
ZiderParty 3 months ago
it was and is a carbon tax scam comments please
red88ization 4 months ago 3
@red88ization It's not. Check "Global warming" on wikipedia. There is international consensus. If you don't believe it: Watch the "HOME" movie. If you still don't care and can't see any impact, I can't do anything for you. Cheers.
gesehengehoert 1 month ago
@gesehengehoert
Do you have the statistics (or have you interviewed all the scientists) so that you can speak with authority on whether or not there is IN FACT a "consensus" of scientists that believe in Global Warming? I already know the answer....
Nonpeon 1 month ago
Global warming is bull$hit!
zerofour04au 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
---------------- ALERT ----------------
FYI: Developed, deployed & implemented is an ultra-violence-system, named AUTONOMY et al. Effectively, an integration spider; e-clouds these: social websites, for data archiving & mining; cookies & browser CERTIFICATES & TOKENS SN registration etc assignments tracking; poly-bio artifacts & personal characteristics identification numbers eg. S_N, Drivers; cross-reference vector analysis: verified & validated sweeps, inc facial rec: OMNISCIENCE-GOV: Yup
CarCriticAssessor 4 months ago
wtf...its suspicious how this guy was working for the world bank before this...i dont want to be a conspiracy theorist but....whatever
koala8 6 months ago
Interviewer is asshole, and the scientits is quite propper, excellent demonstration
rushianokun 8 months ago
Very interesting interview.
euromellows 8 months ago
Anyone noticed they call it "climate change" instead of "global warming" now? COS ITS A FRAUD TO GET YOUR MONEY TO THE BANKSTERS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE!
utube4717 10 months ago 2
The amount of stupid response to this video are amazing. If you want to debate climate change learn atmospheric physics. Otherwise you're just regurgitating what you've been told without the least bit of understanding.
WaxItYourself 10 months ago
InterGOVERNMENTAL panel ay? Earth may be warming 1.4 to 6.4 degrees over the next 100 years ay? Sea may rise as much as 22inches over the next hundred years IF warming continues ay? Is that what all this fuss is about, not exactly Armageddon is it? and for this they want a world tax?
fudgedogbannana 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fudgedogbannana.
.
"for this they want a world tax?"
.
No!
For this we want a carbon reduction.
By the way, the amount of heating is irrelevant. It is the rate of consequential environmental change due to this warming that is relevant. Given current science this overall change has more negative consequences for us human species than positive consequences. Given this scientific stance it makes sense to try to stop or, optimistically, reverse the cause of this global warming. Which is CO2.
wimahlers 11 months ago
@fudgedogbannana Well what you just stated means the end for most coastal cities around the world + some countries so yes actions is quite urgently needed. Curently coral reefs are dying these function as breeding site for a lot of spieces, these will disapear, what problems that will cause is more or less unknown. The effects on ecosystems is so vast that it is not possible to predict what will happen.hopefully not as bad as end Perm when rapidly 93% of all spices got extinct.
Fyhrtheflame 10 months ago
@Fyhrtheflame horsefeathers, the earth is already in a cooling trend, soon it will warm again before it starts to cool, warming and cooling is exactly what the earth does, build above sea level for the next hundred years if you want to but dont bullshit me into paying a world tax.
fudgedogbannana 10 months ago
Wow...more backpedaling than a political convention! great to hear someone actually take one of these boneheads to task!
Donnievil 1 year ago
I like this reporter...
Rikasa75 1 year ago
Holy shit... Am I seeing real news? A real reporter?
lighthammer2531 2 years ago 2
This guy admits to working for the World Bank !!!
That is MOTIVE, people. The monies from Cap & Trade debts [taxes] from the industrialized nations, will be held & distributed by the World Bank.
Stopping Global Warming is not their concern. Their concern is power, money & population reduction.
quaffer22 2 years ago
Didn't all IPCC assessments leading up to report 7 have a consensus man had nothing to do with global warming , Wasn't report 7 tampered with by a man called ben santa to make every one believe this last report was solid like this ignorant illusional man called Robert Watson proclaims ,he talks about precipitation ,dose he know those computer theory models don't do cloud they cant calc cloud ,cloud dose reflect up to 60% of sun rays, there for these fradulant models cant even factor in the sun.
chotaboy66 2 years ago
How can anyone say that the science is solid, when the raw data used has been destroyed and can never be verified?
Gallifrey77203 2 years ago 2
@Gallifrey77203.
.
"How can anyone say that the science is solid, when the raw data used has been destroyed and can never be verified?"
.
What raw data? And what is the siginificance of the raw data?
How about all other data? Is that out of synch? And if not, what is the estimate of the destroyed raw data in relation to the not destroyed raw data? In other words and again what would have been the significance of the destroyed raw data given the most deviated interpretations from the norm?
wimahlers 11 months ago
love him or hate him but there is one man that not one of the alarmists will debate on climate change Lord Christopher Monckton. just do a search listen to him. everything this man states is backed by facts
theebeano 2 years ago
The bbc cant report on this fairly or be imparsial because they've invested millions of public and private money in carbon offsets. What I dont understand is if they say "Anthropogenic Global Warming" is caused by CO2 then cutting down on the CO2 would obviously cause "Anthropogenic Global Freezing" but waite I've read articles that have claimed the resent global cooling over the past fue years is due to global warming I there seems to be an active campaign to confuse the issue.
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
Brilliant, I am somewhat on the fence on this issue, but critical dabate like this is long overdue. I feel a big debate coming and look foward to seeing more like this one. Thank you very much for posting.
pchatingliberal 2 years ago
What exactly is Will Self trying to imply "u r being unnecessarily bullish Andrew and I wonder why"..who is the one with the vested interest here, the presenter or the guy who makes a living out of global warming?
anyfekinnamewilldo 2 years ago
There is TO Climate Change!!!! Winter, Spring, Summer, Fall.
ryanrayonec 2 years ago
@ryanrayonec They're called seasons, they're caused by the rotation of the earth and not the amount of carbon in the atmosphere! basicaly they say the reason why it's warm is down to "AGW" and the reason why it's cold is down to "AGW". some people belive that people are having more of an impact on the planet than what or sun and the freezing temperatures of space are having. the real issue should be about who is investing in this false eco-economy designed to make profits from us.
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
That was my complete and total point sorry I thought that was obvious.
ryanrayonec 2 years ago
yea I know! I had to spell it out a bit more lol no offence intended :-)
TheTempestSpark 2 years ago
It's all good. I'm just sad were literally going backward in evolution. Who didn't read about people being killed for thinking the earth was round without feeling ashamed we were ever that naive and low as a people.
ryanrayonec 2 years ago
bit refreshing
matsutakneatche 2 years ago