Interesting opinions with regards the internet - not by using the medium of the internet. But your point is well founded non the less. I dont make sense to myself so I cant see how i could ever make sense to others.
I'm not convinced the blank look this guy gets when he is enlightening people is because because they don't understand, its because they want to be anywhere else as quickly as possibly.
I think Russell would have very interesting opinions on the Internet. where state and class barriers don't exist.(much)
I do pity this guy. He is so sure he knows the truth of existance - a confidance shared with politicians, organised religions and the ignorant. He reminds me of Otto in a Fish Called Wanda
Your point is garbled up to where you say you think russell would have interesting opinions on the internet at which point it becomes nonsensical. Chinless Wonder Russell often spoke about clear / exact thinking: maybe you'd benefit from listening to him; that way, next time you share your own opinions others will be able to make sense of what it is you're saying.
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth. As of 1850, author Frederick Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion. Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is held by the Crown.
No, ludachris475, Russell was against those things which you claim against him. It seems more likely that you are against free and clear thinking and those like Russell who would support such views. He wasn't right in everything he said indeed he was known to change his mind on various issues. That's becuase he wasn't 'dogmatic.' Your ad hominem attacks are wrong and don't make sense. Try constructing a cogent opposing argument rather than resorting to mere insults.
He was an imbred eugenicist relic of the Norman aristocracy.
Much of his work dealt with methods of by which a ruling oligarchy could dominate the minds and labor of the public. He endorsed using chemicals and needles to this end to labotimize and sterilize the lower classes he considered little more than filthy human cattle; he encouraged promiscuity and prepubescent sex in order to debase and bestialize people into animals.
yawn....there isnt enough time to help you, 2010 is around the corner, this isnt me speaking in the post, its alan watt (not alan watts or me), i could lambast you further but why mock the dead
"It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment."- Russell
Key phrase. John Stuart Mill held the same principle. We know that utilitarianism offers a limited outlook on life, but one can hardly call someone who suscribes to this principle naive.
Africans were slated for extinction by the economists who worked for the British east india company/british empire--one of these was john stuart mill---said the black men would have to go because they wdnt adapt...he wanted them exterminated--he wrote copiously on this plan (as did his son) about the ppls to be eradicated since NOTHING CAN BE BROUGHT INTO THE NEW AGE THAT CAN'T ADAPT. Try reading original works rather than commentaries. That way you won't be so easily bamboozled.
The Congress for Cultural Freedom was a Russell coup on modern culture with the aim of debasing it and reducing it to barbarity, consumption, and mindless compulsion.
I`m very surprised. The things u all r saying are admirably... childish. This video, all that it says, its completelly wrong if u believe that Russell defend those words. Have u ever read Bertrand Russell`s work?? Its clear u havent. Those words are probably from the book called «The scientific outlook».
(...) Well, u should know that he wrote it, in simple words (for u to understand), to make a view of what society will be if the way that governants are leading it, dont change. He never defended that kind of society, no way; he gave his life to fight against it.
I have read about how evil Lord Bertrand Russell was. He once propounded premptive nuclear war against the Soviet Union, not to defeat the Soviet Union, but to force the Soviet Union to submit to World Government.
Thanks for corrupting us, Kirk
PantsThatDontFit 1 year ago
Somnolent.
DreadfulSolemnity 2 years ago
Lord Russell was himself a Freemason.
DreadfulSolemnity 2 years ago
He was the Thinker and Co-Thinker of policies of mass Depopulation, eugenics, forced mass sterilisation, promiscuity, drug use, and prepubescent sex.
DreadfulSolemnity 2 years ago
Comment removed
DreadfulSolemnity 2 years ago
Comment removed
DreadfulSolemnity 2 years ago
bertrand russell boils down to a scary mixture between "Brave new world" and "1984". It's almost awe inspiring
HENN3H 2 years ago 3
Interesting opinions with regards the internet - not by using the medium of the internet. But your point is well founded non the less. I dont make sense to myself so I cant see how i could ever make sense to others.
catchalotmor 2 years ago
I'm not convinced the blank look this guy gets when he is enlightening people is because because they don't understand, its because they want to be anywhere else as quickly as possibly.
I think Russell would have very interesting opinions on the Internet. where state and class barriers don't exist.(much)
I do pity this guy. He is so sure he knows the truth of existance - a confidance shared with politicians, organised religions and the ignorant. He reminds me of Otto in a Fish Called Wanda
catchalotmor 3 years ago
Your point is garbled up to where you say you think russell would have interesting opinions on the internet at which point it becomes nonsensical. Chinless Wonder Russell often spoke about clear / exact thinking: maybe you'd benefit from listening to him; that way, next time you share your own opinions others will be able to make sense of what it is you're saying.
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 2 years ago 3
The population is so far gone.
We are in the final stages of the integration of the continents.
ludachris475 3 years ago
The Crown reaped billions in profits while operating under the protection of the British armed forces. This was not British commerce or British wealth, but the Crown's commerce and the Crown's wealth. As of 1850, author Frederick Morton estimated the Rothschild fortune to be in excess of $10 billion. Today, the bonded indebtedness of the world is held by the Crown.
ludachris475 3 years ago
No, ludachris475, Russell was against those things which you claim against him. It seems more likely that you are against free and clear thinking and those like Russell who would support such views. He wasn't right in everything he said indeed he was known to change his mind on various issues. That's becuase he wasn't 'dogmatic.' Your ad hominem attacks are wrong and don't make sense. Try constructing a cogent opposing argument rather than resorting to mere insults.
Lambtonboy 3 years ago
Lord Russell was born of one of the 13 Illumanti bloodlines.
ludachris475 3 years ago
How did Russell support clear thinking AND things like injections, poor diet.. for all children? Did you hit play, or?..
digggininthedirt 2 years ago
As I said, Lord Russell was an inhuman beast.
He was a racist, eugenicist, and a piss-poor mathematician.
ludachris475 3 years ago
"Lord Russell was an inhuman beast.
He was a racist, eugenicist, and a piss-poor mathematician."
Which of his books have you read?
artyfarty2 3 years ago
By 2010 we will all be dead. The Internet will be a forgotten dream.
ludachris475 3 years ago
"By 2010 we will all be dead".
Oh dear, I guess we're all doomed then. LOL.
I do hope you lighten up in 2011.
artyfarty2 3 years ago
Bertrand Russell was a scholarly demagogue.
He was an imbred eugenicist relic of the Norman aristocracy.
Much of his work dealt with methods of by which a ruling oligarchy could dominate the minds and labor of the public. He endorsed using chemicals and needles to this end to labotimize and sterilize the lower classes he considered little more than filthy human cattle; he encouraged promiscuity and prepubescent sex in order to debase and bestialize people into animals.
ludachris475 3 years ago
All this plan doesn't seem to demoralised and destroyed your thinking, or has it? There's a different between critique and intellectual quackery.
Karl Marx wrote on the Jewish Q, so that must mean he's an anti-semite? Heard it all before...
What are you reading from anyway?
marcvanderloo 3 years ago
yawn....there isnt enough time to help you, 2010 is around the corner, this isnt me speaking in the post, its alan watt (not alan watts or me), i could lambast you further but why mock the dead
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
I find these pop culture icons distracting to the message.
BeatBuddy 3 years ago
then turn your head away--not everyone can multi-task
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago 5
"It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment."- Russell
ultralazarus 3 years ago 2
Bertrand Russell was AFRAID this would happen, and warning against it, NOT advocating it.
Meibukan 4 years ago
Correct
Voltajavi 3 years ago
who are you trying to kid?
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago 4
Russell was a pacifist and spoke for the advancements of all creeds as long as they dont hurt anyone
Voltajavi 3 years ago
naive
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago 5
"as long as they dont hurt anyone"
Key phrase. John Stuart Mill held the same principle. We know that utilitarianism offers a limited outlook on life, but one can hardly call someone who suscribes to this principle naive.
BeatBuddy 3 years ago
Africans were slated for extinction by the economists who worked for the British east india company/british empire--one of these was john stuart mill---said the black men would have to go because they wdnt adapt...he wanted them exterminated--he wrote copiously on this plan (as did his son) about the ppls to be eradicated since NOTHING CAN BE BROUGHT INTO THE NEW AGE THAT CAN'T ADAPT. Try reading original works rather than commentaries. That way you won't be so easily bamboozled.
EmmaCharlotteStubbs 3 years ago 3
The Congress for Cultural Freedom was a Russell coup on modern culture with the aim of debasing it and reducing it to barbarity, consumption, and mindless compulsion.
ludachris475 4 years ago
I`m very surprised. The things u all r saying are admirably... childish. This video, all that it says, its completelly wrong if u believe that Russell defend those words. Have u ever read Bertrand Russell`s work?? Its clear u havent. Those words are probably from the book called «The scientific outlook».
(see next post)
Chichapanza 4 years ago
(...) Well, u should know that he wrote it, in simple words (for u to understand), to make a view of what society will be if the way that governants are leading it, dont change. He never defended that kind of society, no way; he gave his life to fight against it.
Chichapanza 4 years ago
yawn....... your insight is weak
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 4 years ago
very wikipedia, so you think russell was benevolent, i cant help you , enjoy voting
ThEpErsOnLiGHts 3 years ago
Read: The impact of Science on Society.
scientistwriter 4 years ago 6
I have read about how evil Lord Bertrand Russell was. He once propounded premptive nuclear war against the Soviet Union, not to defeat the Soviet Union, but to force the Soviet Union to submit to World Government.
ludachris475 4 years ago
@ludachris475 aye that was probably why he was a leading figure in CND. Stay off the internet.
billytrack 11 months ago
Bertrand Russell is an evil, evil man!!!!!
ludachris475 4 years ago 2
my goodness
kurydebarcelona 4 years ago 3