The more you post videos of Neal Boortz (even in spite of the efforts you take to discredit the content), the more viewers and minds are transformed into libertarians.
To eyes on fox , your little dumb on fox backfired on you ! What on this post does not make sense morons ? The UN is a waste of american money and time . But we all know you liberals love the communist UN . Need any thinking person not see liberals for what you are , Anti American losers at every turn ! The jokes on you , Eyes on fox !!!!!
The U.N is only good at helping countries mediate their way out of war. That was the point of it's creation. It is utterly worthless for anything else.
Where's the proof, show me the link,or shut your mouth. I agree the U.N. has been against the United States for a long time. This american wants the funding for the U.N. to stop, And to have the U.N. building destroyed. Let some other foreign government incur the cost and give the people of the United States a break from paying for the worst bunch of lazy ass leaders,who can't even stand up for whats right in this world.
The UN is a fucking waste of time and effort for everyone, and the UN should be kicked from the USA and sent to Geneva or elsewhere. Tired of the shit. The UN isn't even the UN. It just belongs to the US, Russia, and China. The US gives the majority of military and domestic aid and it's pathetic.
@Andybabez Or we can just stop this false belief in the abilities of international organizations, and actually focus on the developments within our own borders. In the end, the UN, NATO, US Interventionist Foreign Policy, et cetera are essentially a waste of time and resources for the United States.
To eyesonfox---you actually provided people like me a great service in speading a message that a great many people believe in. The UN is hell-bent in weakening both the US Government AND THE CITIZENS. Get the UN out of the US, and the US out of the UN.
The Human Rights Council in the UN is the biggest joke! They actually let dictators sit on it. What kind of hypocrisy is that?? These dictators just bash Israel all day long while ignoring human rights abuses in the Middle East or their own countries. And when UN Watch exposes this hypocrisy, the leaders of that silly body turn a blind eye and ask that their comments be stricken from the record!
They kicked us off the HRC and replaced us with Sudan. That should tell anyone how concerned the UN is with Human Rights. For further proof read Article 29 Section 3 of the UN Universal Declaration of HR and you will see just how "concerned" they are about protecting Human Rights.
The US has pretty damn good capitalist non-nationalized healthcare for an advanced industrialized nation. I wish people would admit that instead of claiming it's "so much worse" than Britain, Canada, or France's BS healthcare systems, where rationing is prevalent.
I don't like Fox much, either, but these guys on this point are absolutely right. The UN is worthless. Fuck em! Their "peacekeeping" operations are a disaster, and those who want us to send peacekeepers to Darfur should remember all that BS in Congo. Or the photos of Belgian peacekeepers forcing African kids to drink vomit and salt and swinging them right over burning barrels.
The UN can't do much right. I never trusted that BS WHO study that claims the US is 37th in healthcare. Please!
That 37th is because in the US everyone is counted. Take infant mortality, in the US we count them all. The rest of those countries do not. Some of them don't count the ones that die within 24 hours of birth, some don't count those under a specific weight, and others don't count them if they were born premature. In the US we count them all. That is where our low rating comes from, those other countries have a tendency to cook the data.
The American government uses the U.N. as a instrument or mechanism to rule the world and the small petty nation of the third world, I find it funny that common Americans don't realize the U.N is subservient to the U.S Gov. as a right wing ultra nationalist fascist you should educate your self on what a precious tool the U.N. is to U.S imperialism across the world, and the only reason the U.N exist is because the U.S. government wants it around .
Why is UN bashing only right-wing? Everyone should realize that is has done nothing for us. I also dont liek the idea of setting up a new "UN" with the basic human rights bs. We are the United STATES. Restore more sovereingty to the states, then to the fed govt, no power for foreigners running our lives
The thing I like about Neal, while I don't agree with some of his views, he is not afraid to tell it how it is even if people don't approve of what he says. There's something about the Anti politically correct attitude that I like.
The US has been the most moral nation in history. Just look at our citizens, we give more to charities, national and international, than any other country. We had slaves and we freed them, now the ancestor of a slave is the president. Relative to other countries, America is extremely moral. Give me a break with your 'america is immoral' BS.
Firstly, Barack Obama is not a decendant of slaves, check your facts.
Second, prove that you give most to charities, and then also compare the per head contributions to charity because most other countries have smaller populations but per head give way more then you.
Btw, it took you almost 100 years after you were created to abolish slavery. Dont give me the crap that your the most moral nation in history. Look at the CIA, your foriegn policy,Patriot Act, Guantanamo, Iraq, Vietnam etc
One of the greatest leaders this world has ever seen sent forth by God was a decendant of slaves. Moses. Jesus, and all of his kings over the Jews were decendants of slaves. God chose decendants of slaves. Not the wealthy Egyptians or babylonians who were wealthy and the most so called edcuated in teh world at that time.
Screw god! What has "God" ever done for anyone. Seems like everytime something happens that people can't explain, they attribute it to "God"
If there really was a god that loved us as the Christians like to say, then why are there so much hate and suffering in the world. Why are there children in africa who'se parents die of AIDS and then they are forced to raise their siblings while still being a child themselves. That to me is not the work of a loving god.
BOORTZ is just another fake conservative Neocon who gives lip service to social conservatives to get what is sacred to really sacred to the Neocons-more War for Oil and Israel. Also the "War on terror" is a fraud. You Tube WTC 7 collapse an its an obvious controlled demolition and there were explosives inside all the buildings.
No it's not an obvious controlled detonation. Thousands of experts searching the ruins that find hydrocarbons from jet fuel burning, but no trace of explosives. Boortz is not a neocon, he is a libertarian. The United Nations sucks money and time from the US treasury while we provide nearly 70% funding for an organization that has never supported us, but instead has acted against us at every turn. Their policies and programs are wasteful and meaningless.
Heads of UN charity organizations make more than heads of state. The UN Intellectual Properties Bureau, for example, has fined the united states millions for american citizens caught illegally importing files through p2p programs, but american movies were found to be not liable for protection under the UN, because they "...originate from a country that can well afford a reduced profit margin." Well done, yet again, UN.
Also, Kena, I understand that the argument to stop the war on a people that has been kidnapping, bombing, raping, and just outright murdering our own people for the past 40 years is weak at best. But to try to strengthen your position by saying the nearly 3,000 people killed in 9/11 was anything other than yet another brutal tactic by a barbaric enemy is to dishonor their memory, and the memories of those that weren't so cowardly as you - and faced the evil of radical islam.
Also, Kena, I understand that the argument to stop the war on a people that has been kidnapping, bombing, raping, and just outright murdering our own people for the past 40 years is weak at best. But to try to strengthen your position by saying the nearly 3,000 people killed in 9/11 was anything other than yet another brutal tactic by a barbaric enemy is to dishonor their memory, and the memories of those that weren't so cowardly as you - and faced the evil of radical islam.
68W2M072, you are the coward. You live in denial and wont even take 1 minute to watch the WTC 7 COLLAPSE. Even a 12 yr old can figure its an obvious controlled demolition. YOU do dishonor to the victims of 911 by ignoring the evidence. Go ahead you cowardly fuck and live in Denial.
I have watched the video, and many other videos concerning the WTC collapse. I also watched several videos with bigfoot and the lochness monster, even chupacabra. There is no justification or reason behind WTC being an inside job, but most of all, there is not even a shred of evidence. No evidence of WTC "coverup" has ever survived even the weakest scrutiny. The only "evidence" that remains today is in modified videos and a crackpot janitor that is making millions on testimonial videos.
Science says no what? There is no science debunking the 9/11 attacks. Produce this 'evidence,' I will show you how it is false. All the "truthseekers" have is fake edited videos on youtube, and those are horrible to days the least. Lets see some "science" behind your lies.
H. L. Menken warned us about Neal Boortz, those who claim to be defenders of Freedom will turn out to be its greatest enemies. A man who claims to be one of America's greatest patriots, but must have made a right turn at Los Angeles on his way to Vietnam. Sounds about right for a Reagan Supporter. Reagan, the former Life Guard and College Football player, who suddenly became 4-F in the face of Adolf Hitler. Yeah, a man of real principles.
So if the UN decides they have some great plan, you have ZERO HUMAN RIGHTS. Hell they could put you in slavery if they wanted to, take all your property, and do God knows what else.
The UN operates under the assumption that the people are given their rights by the government.
One document sums up the entire UN, and that's the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. President Clinton called it "one of the most important documents of human history". It list out the rights of all humans; some very similar to the US Bill of Rights.
You lie to start a war, invade a country who had done nothing to us, kill 1,000,000 people and we're the good guys?
This is exactly what George Orwell meant when he wrote 1984.
You guys see yourselves as a master race, not as a country of 300,000,000 in a world of 8,000,000,000 people. We make up 5% of the world's population and should act like it.
I remember reading one definition of intelligence, someone who listens more than they talk. I know what ignorance is...
What's the matter "bkohatl"... tin foil hat on too tight?? Following flawed intel is not lying... and the intel may have been more reliable if the Clinton admin had not undercut out ability to employ time proven tactics to gather intel. Sadam DID support Bin Laden's organization as well as terrorism in general. If you think THIS is Orwellian you need to read more... the Democrat party is the one pushing for an Orwellian "Thought Police"... (see 'hate-crimes' legisaltion)
"This is exactly what George Orwell meant when he wrote 1984."
Wasn't Orwell writing about "Big Brother," aka the Government? I f'n hate the government, because it never knows it's boundaries, but your liberal-socialist Democrats are the biggest "Big Brother" (Government) lovers in the country.
What Orwell definitely WASN'T writing about was personal responsibility, capitalism, freedom. Orwell WASN'T writing about Libertarians.
Super Patriot Neal Boortz and Neil Cavuto both Hawks on Defense and supporters of the war in Iraq both dodged military service in Vietnam.
Orwell was about people saying exactly the opposite of what they really mean. Or does Strong on Defense mean War Profiteer. Always remember former Football Player and Lifeguard got a studio Doctor to declare him 4-F. He didn't fight Hitler, no surprise there, is there.
The 4-F Football Player and Lifeguard is Ronald Reagan of course. Then again Rush Limbaugh played High School Football and got himself declared 4-F too. Funny, all these invalid Republican Hawks. Or is that cowards. Reagan should have fought to stop Hitler, no one had an excuse and he should have been ashamed of himself.
I love how the poster of this video tried to make people hate the right wing for wanting to get rid of the U.N. but instead got a bunch of people telling him/her that the U.N. is shit and that he's an idiot!
foreal! "eyesonfox" video post backfired, seeing in the field of world peace and international diplomacy more gets done at the local tittie-club than the UN general assembly.
Ummm, news flash - No matter how much you hate FOX News, it doesn't make CNN and MSNBC any less pathetic in their own biases, period, end of story.
Maybe instead of foaming at the mouth with hatred, failing networks ought to look in the mirror at their own objectivity and ask why nobody watches them anymore?
So FOX is biased? Then move to the center and clean their clocks by attracting people whom want REAL FACTS instead of either conservative or LIBERAL propaganda? What a novel concept!
We(Bush and his henchmen) came up with the idea(if you believe them) of invading Iraq to liberate them, they didn't ask us in. Iraq wasn't a center of terrorism before we invaded, now it is. We "liberated" Afghanistan: turned it into the world's largest supplier of Heroin. We are becoming very consistant, taking a bad situation and making it worse.
The Oil in Iraq belongs to the Iraqi People, is we take it then we are thieves. Which explains why it is the #1 Target of Insurgents.
Herr Adolf Hitler work to destroy the League of Nations before the beginning of World War II. His purpose in his own words was to prevent organized opposition to Nazi Germany. After George Bush invaded Iraq to steal Oil, having killed 1,000,000 Iraqi people, George W. Bush and His Henchman, especially John Bolton, have worked to destroy the UN for the same reason. If you see Neal Boortz, give him a Sieg Heil, Herr Boortz, he'll feel right at home and it will bring back memories of hsi past.
You liberals are the Nazis for supporting the UN. The UN hates Jews, makes excuses for terrorists and dictators, hates America, and steals from charities.
We should dump the UN for superceding the Constitution of the United States, and attempting to force far-left policy's on the American people, namely, gun control.
Since when do other nations get to decide OUR domestic policy? There's no "humanitarian" crises here, just the ol' UN meddling in our country.
He is more accurately described as a "neo-Libertarian". I know, I know, I never heard of that before either but I looked it up. On certain core essentials they agree with mainstream Libertarianism but they have an interventionist foreign policy agenda. That seems rather contrary to the Libertarianism that I subscribe to but they clearly fall under the same tent philosophically in nearly all other aspects.
Of course UN is corrupt -- what human group is NOT? Look at congress. Look at your local government, look at any place that has money and status involved, and you will have cheatin lying bastards. But thats mankind. Its real hard to get rabbits to run these things.
Im always amazed that stupid people have so much in common. They all seem to want to get rid of UN, they all love the Fair tax, and they all believe every conspiracy that other stupid people dream up. I sense a pattern.
Before you get rid of the UN cause Boortz says so, better find out how rational this huckster is, in his wacko wacko Flat tax nonsense. If he is misleads stupid people about that, he will mislead stupid people about UN too.
The "fair and balanced" thing only applies to news reports, not to opinion pieces. Why does this fact elude so many people? Columns in newspapers are comprised of opinions, as well, and should not be deemed "articles." The fact that so few people can distinguish between news and editorial items is yet another testament to the failure of government schools.
Fair and balanced? Are you mental? Only applies to news reports? We finally got FOX and I was very eager to see it. The FIRST DAY i watched it, the weather guy -- THE WEATHER GUY-- asked during the WEATHER -"why do democrats hate america?". HItler type guy couldnt fool Americans now -- but slick hate mongers like FOX, could. Yes, they have some great shows, Beltway boys, stock shows. But Im smart enough to handle it. Frankly, most people arent.
Abax -- the fact that you dont know what the hell you are talking about should embarrass the hell out of you. Its a testiment to your lousy education, and your self delusion. Fox has blurred its news and editorials. Better go get your junior college tuition back. Maybe use it to read a book or two.
Why so hostile? Have you not noticed how opinions have increasingly crept into network news reports over the past few decades? Yet I hear so few comparisons between left-wing news people and Hitler. And the gratuitous use of Hitler comparisons is the intellectual equivalent of hollering a bad word and then running away. By the way, I worked as a print journalist and news editor for years. Your spelling and punctuation drive home the aforementioned point about government schools.
You can thank JFK and RWR for defeating the communist threat with strong military authority supported by economic dominance. It was less than 200k lives lost. Slightly more than the numbers of women imprisoned in rape camps that we freed. But what the hell... What American should care about that?
rape camps, really? i thought it was WMDs but whats the difference. its not like JFK used the UN to resolve the cuban missile crisis, or that both WWI and WWII were both enabled because there was no strong international governing body. and were not talking about communists were talking about WWIII. and no militarism does not keep peace. it only means we all die faster or more efficiently.
wow, eyesonfox, do you just hate America so much that you have to call stuff like this bad? It's "left-winged propangda" like the crap you're spreading in reference to this that's destroying America! If you don't like the USA, then get out!
Don't forget that the MoveOn Democrats and Charles Rangel think wealthy people should be punished by raising taxes. This also includes any American who saves money and invests. Think about it. They want to punish us for saving money and investing by paying higher taxes to fund their pork and earmarks, but lower taxes for the poor who don't save and spend every single penny they make.
Right, they do idolize a rich guy who gets away with killing a girl while drunk driving. The MoveOn democrats have a wide array of moral and ethical leaders with Ted Kennedy leading the way. How about Bill Clinton? They hold him in high regard too.
'world democracy'.....i think i've to throw up, why don't we put all the greedy humans on 2 islands, call it 'twin powers', and build up community again in the western world, starting with throwing your television into the garbage......but no, you want 'world democracy'....
Equally right-wing Neal Boortz? You're a moron and typical liberal. Neal is a Libertarian and, for example, wants to legalize marijuana and other drugs. Hardly an "equally right-wing" view buddy. And Neal criticizes both left and right all the time on his radio show. Go drink some kool-aid with your liberal pals.
He's what I'd like to call a neo-libertarian. He has libertarian views on domestic policy and neo-conservative views on foreign policy. Ron Paul. Now that's a real libertarian.
I honestly don't think Americans are aware of how their country is beginning to die. I think we're seeing the end of the United States as a world leader. If I look around the world now, I can't think of a single country that stands by America.
I'm a Brit, supposedly the USA's biggest ally and even we don't want to be part of that political agenda. It's like your nation is becoming a right-wing version of the old Soviet Union.
very profound. and i asume everyone has forgotten why the UN was created. the same reason why the leage of nations was created and look what happened then when we did not participate in that.
Ghandi, MLK...examples of peace winning out? How naive are you? While they were great men, it wasn't their peaceful resistance so much as the aggressive and violent reactions to these movements. Images of dogs attacking black people and police using fire hoses against peaceful protesters did far more to change racial attitudes in this country.
that is what peaceful resistince is. martin luther king and gandhi knew what they were walking into they knew they would go to jail get death threats and be beaten and they were still peaceful.
what came out of europe from the fall of rome to the reformation, what came out of europe? and yea we were civil with gandhi, martin luther king i mean it wasnt like gandhi worked for 30 years before britain left india and the british never massecred indians protestors, and i mean we didnt use attack dogs or hoses on martin luther king i mean its not like we had senoters say segragation now segragation tommorow segregation forever.
The U.N. is a joke. Anyone who discredits someone for speaking against that disgusting group of Demogogues is an idiot and a light-weight. I do not pledge myself to the U.N. only America. I know how much Liberals hate America and worship the U.N, you political whores.
Gandhi got rights for minorities in south africa and then got britain out of india with peaceful resistance, then some war monger thought war was a better option and shot him and you have unresolved problems in the kashmir. nelson mandela ended apairtied, and when he got power did not have a blood bath of justice. so yeah peace never worked.
the britts have a bill of rights also.actualy they coined the term.peace does work when one side is willing to listen but saddam didnt listen.nelson ended apartides yes buthe was not such a peacefull man and you know that,just because he didnt go on a rampage afterwards is not any indication of him being a gentle person.
no,i do not believe that war creats peace.peace is what you get if the good guys win.if the bad guys win then you just get more jihad.tell me,when was there a conflict between two nations that was settled and stayed settled by a brokerd peace agreement and no military comflict?how long did that last?
the questin you should ask is not how many times has peace worked it should be how many times was it tried. but if you really want one the civil rights era with martin luther king.
that only worked because they had protection under the contitution and the bill of rights.but still one must remember that we are talking about a man who killed 100,000 people inside his own borders.
remember you are talking about a man who killed around 100,000 of his own people and lobbed mistles at his neighbor for no reason after invading another.
you talk about how saddam attacked iran? is that not what you want to do. also who gave saddam the weapons that he attacked iran with o yeah it was us, oops. i believe dick cheney himself in 1994 said that it would not be reasonable to take out saddam after the first gulf war. because there would be a civil war and you couldnt replace it with a goverment and quote a "Quagmire"
no,i was talking about how during dessert storm sadda has lobing mistles into isreal and they did even have a dog in the fight.i do not defend nixons retarded idea that he could have a dictator for a pet but at least we are making an attempt to fix it now.whats wrong with trying to fix a f*#kup?
ok,you got me on the date.i always think of the rise of islam as being part of the dark ages and for the record going war was one of the first things islam did.now,if you have a dictator who has already demonstrated a lact of humanity and has thrown off the surrender agreement that he himself signed and has refused 14 times to come into compliance there can be but one way to deal with a person like that
you do know the term dark ages refers to roman cathlic europe not the islamic empire. you know why because at that time when all the christains did was war, the muslims made major advances in science, math, astronamy, they preserved the greek and roman classics and the created the hospital. its what is called a golden age.
yes i do (from 470 something a.d. to around 1,000 a.d.) and the term "dark ages" is used to convey the lact of recorded history from western europe after the fall of the roman empire and it was not such a backward era as is the popular miscaonception.
what part of "we are commited" do you have a problem with? we cam with a promise of freedom nad now we have to make good on it or the close to 4000 troops that we have lost so far will be for nothing at all.
second our president says were fighting for freedom but to fight this war he gets rid of basic freedoms and rights to his own people. your retarted if you believe war can achieve peace. you can bomb the world to pieces, but you cant bomb it to peace.
bumper sticker come on its a simple truth, do you really believe war makes peace. o and nice example because we all know the police have a wonderful history of keeping the peace i mean just look at the civil rights era. now my questin is do you think the UN was wrong by telling us not to invade iraq, or are you just ignoring it.
WAKE UP!!!! they declared war on us back in the 70's. they have been at war with us for over 1400yrs. if we do not stomp this out now our children and grandchildren and so will inherit this problem. and it is by no meens a disaster.we were in vietnam for 8 years and lost over 50,000 men.we can do this.hell it may well be over now if the libbs werent working night and day trying to get in our own troops way.
we lost in vietnam that war was fought by us for 10 years. and before by france for 4 years. 50,000 troops died because america decided it would fight anything called communist regardless of why these countrys were becoming communist. wait it has been 1400 years since the 70's i think you made an error in your math. war is stupid its senseless the troops in iraq are dying for nothing. why may you ask because the war in iraq is first of all illegal.
cute catch frazes.look who is fighting a bumpersticker war now.islam started highjacking planes back in the 70 but islam has been at war with the west for over 1400 years (535ad) stupid.andi if this war is SOOOOO illegal than you can blame 90% of you beloved retard democrats because they vopted for it stupid. but yes you cxan inforce peace stupid, the police do it every day stupid.and sometimes they have to shoot someo one to keep that peace stupid.get you head out of you own butt.
i see your problem your not thinking logically. you see heres one of your points "if this war is SOOOOO illegal than you can blame 90% of you beloved retard democrats" ok so what that does not mean anything its a true statement sure the democrats have some fault in this. so what is your point, you dont have one. if your gonna give a date make sure its right islam started in 613 AD, STUPID.
all religious and communist based goverments exist in defiance of freedom and all that is humane. they hate cappitalism and democracy because they are power hungry and thing only a select few citizens fave any control on government and every one else has to eat it. would you want to live like that?
peace is what you get after the bad guys get the crp kicked out of them retard. you cant talk sence into the head of a cromag who wears a towl on his head and uses his left hand for toilet paper, it just wont work. peace must be inforced witht the threat and when needed the use of violence.
US OUT OF US AND US OUT OF UN! The UN rapes girls, steals aid, is full of deadbeats, hates America, supports dictators, and makes excuses for terrorists. Ironically, the US is the largest donor to the UN.
hmm you are an ass monkey. this is not fair and balancedhow? cause they have a conservative commentator? u ever watch mslsd??you are an idiot. please stop polluting your mind.
saddam was told by the UN 14 times and threatened with force 14 times to let the inspectors back in but he did not,you want to blame some one for the war in iraq....blame saddam,but we gave him 14 chances
umm yea remember how the UN told us that the war in iraq would be a disastor and then we ignored them, and then it was a disaster. just because you threaten some one it doesnt make invading a country any more justified. your other comment makes sense if you want peace you create war. kind of like when i want when i want to eat a pint of ben and jerrys i give up eating ice cream.
OMFG what will it take to convince you and the retard sudo-libs like to wake up and know that there will always be those who will never embrace freedom and will always try to kill it no matter what YOU say about it. you can toalk youre self out of every thing.
p.s if you're going to sit up here and call me a liberal because i see right from wrong and stupid from smart then it only shows your own stupidity. you stand in a crowd no matter what just because it's the agenda no matter what the facts are. that's peer pressure! that's ignorance! that's dogma! that's actually religion! i'll be the first person to say liberals make me sick. from gay marriage to open borders.
Peace is served like this...an islamic extremists (the enemy for you goverment educated)is blown up or shot and killed. The enemy is destroyed, this individual will no longer distrupt peace. Is this broken down enough for you bed wetting liberal?
does saddam include extremists? does iran and syria include extremists? oh right radical islam the sect that doesn't exist. i guess installing the shah of iran and refusing to send him back to iran for execution has nothing to do with it. peace doesn't involve bombs or regime changes. peace involves dialogue i'm sorry that i offend your almost satanic and unjesus like rhetoric about bombing millions of people
yeah that's right! dubya's going to lead a large "peace initiative" into iran and start ww3. and another "peace initiative" into syria and possibly pakistan. but i guess you're the one in the right here. afterall war is peace ;)
The more you post videos of Neal Boortz (even in spite of the efforts you take to discredit the content), the more viewers and minds are transformed into libertarians.
leftisntright 7 months ago
I just started reading Neal Boortz's "Someone's Gotta Say It!". I have come to the conclusion that Neal Boortz should be President!
ajsaccount1991 9 months ago 2
To eyes on fox , your little dumb on fox backfired on you ! What on this post does not make sense morons ? The UN is a waste of american money and time . But we all know you liberals love the communist UN . Need any thinking person not see liberals for what you are , Anti American losers at every turn ! The jokes on you , Eyes on fox !!!!!
MrTtillub 9 months ago
Makes perfect sense to me, The UN is Bad news, and should be done away with, The sooner the Better!
MrTraceMan 9 months ago 2
That all sounded about right. Not sure what your beef is... Thanks for the ammo.
stopstickers 10 months ago
the un is useless...unamerican ...get them out!
daverunner 1 year ago
The U.N is only good at helping countries mediate their way out of war. That was the point of it's creation. It is utterly worthless for anything else.
xTRAPJAWx 1 year ago
The fact that leftists love the UN is proof enough as to why it needs to be dismantled.
eimb1999 1 year ago 2
@eimb1999 Great statement ! Thanks for the post !!!1
MrTtillub 9 months ago
The UN is a joke, its a platform for people like Ahmadinejad to rant at the world for an hour. On top of that, they just steal and launder money.
dijhili 1 year ago 3
Where's the proof, show me the link,or shut your mouth. I agree the U.N. has been against the United States for a long time. This american wants the funding for the U.N. to stop, And to have the U.N. building destroyed. Let some other foreign government incur the cost and give the people of the United States a break from paying for the worst bunch of lazy ass leaders,who can't even stand up for whats right in this world.
ajkopy 1 year ago 3
The UN is a fucking waste of time and effort for everyone, and the UN should be kicked from the USA and sent to Geneva or elsewhere. Tired of the shit. The UN isn't even the UN. It just belongs to the US, Russia, and China. The US gives the majority of military and domestic aid and it's pathetic.
rtgoodson 1 year ago 5
agreed.
fedtheend 1 year ago
I think all countries with western-style laws should leave the UN and form an Alliance of Free Nations' with membership benefits conditional upon:
Women being legally equal to men (this automatically excludes Islamic states) and free to love anyone they deem worthy.
The right to criticise leaders, ideas, religions, etc (and the right to reply).
Accept that freedom of speech includes offensive comments.
Comparative religion taught in schools with no promotion of one faith as 'the correct one'.
Andybabez 2 years ago
Amen...and no mention of that abhorrent clause that exempts those rights that interfere with the purposes of the UN. It's a disgusting organization.
aeturnallrain 2 years ago 2
@Andybabez Or we can just stop this false belief in the abilities of international organizations, and actually focus on the developments within our own borders. In the end, the UN, NATO, US Interventionist Foreign Policy, et cetera are essentially a waste of time and resources for the United States.
rtgoodson 1 year ago
Boortz is a Libertarian. Not a conservative. Sry had to point that out.
jakethedrummer2814 2 years ago 13
yea we should make and new un
breerex123 2 years ago
To eyesonfox---you actually provided people like me a great service in speading a message that a great many people believe in. The UN is hell-bent in weakening both the US Government AND THE CITIZENS. Get the UN out of the US, and the US out of the UN.
aeturnallrain 2 years ago
Right on. We could save plenty of money, we could end alot of this crap they pull, and we could focus more on our own problems.
CRTV1982 2 years ago
@ eyesonfox- If Boortz is right wing, then Bill Clinton is the GOP Chairman
jdshadle 2 years ago 5
The Human Rights Council in the UN is the biggest joke! They actually let dictators sit on it. What kind of hypocrisy is that?? These dictators just bash Israel all day long while ignoring human rights abuses in the Middle East or their own countries. And when UN Watch exposes this hypocrisy, the leaders of that silly body turn a blind eye and ask that their comments be stricken from the record!
whoo689 2 years ago
They kicked us off the HRC and replaced us with Sudan. That should tell anyone how concerned the UN is with Human Rights. For further proof read Article 29 Section 3 of the UN Universal Declaration of HR and you will see just how "concerned" they are about protecting Human Rights.
CRTV1982 2 years ago
The US has pretty damn good capitalist non-nationalized healthcare for an advanced industrialized nation. I wish people would admit that instead of claiming it's "so much worse" than Britain, Canada, or France's BS healthcare systems, where rationing is prevalent.
whoo689 2 years ago
I don't like Fox much, either, but these guys on this point are absolutely right. The UN is worthless. Fuck em! Their "peacekeeping" operations are a disaster, and those who want us to send peacekeepers to Darfur should remember all that BS in Congo. Or the photos of Belgian peacekeepers forcing African kids to drink vomit and salt and swinging them right over burning barrels.
The UN can't do much right. I never trusted that BS WHO study that claims the US is 37th in healthcare. Please!
whoo689 2 years ago
That 37th is because in the US everyone is counted. Take infant mortality, in the US we count them all. The rest of those countries do not. Some of them don't count the ones that die within 24 hours of birth, some don't count those under a specific weight, and others don't count them if they were born premature. In the US we count them all. That is where our low rating comes from, those other countries have a tendency to cook the data.
CRTV1982 2 years ago
The American government uses the U.N. as a instrument or mechanism to rule the world and the small petty nation of the third world, I find it funny that common Americans don't realize the U.N is subservient to the U.S Gov. as a right wing ultra nationalist fascist you should educate your self on what a precious tool the U.N. is to U.S imperialism across the world, and the only reason the U.N exist is because the U.S. government wants it around .
agrippa9 2 years ago
u.n is very anti-american they want u.s be weak i them out this country
codedress234 2 years ago
Why is UN bashing only right-wing? Everyone should realize that is has done nothing for us. I also dont liek the idea of setting up a new "UN" with the basic human rights bs. We are the United STATES. Restore more sovereingty to the states, then to the fed govt, no power for foreigners running our lives
lsucowboys99 2 years ago 3
AGREE 100%
h23a1player 2 years ago
the UN needs to go
lsucowboys99 2 years ago 2
The thing I like about Neal, while I don't agree with some of his views, he is not afraid to tell it how it is even if people don't approve of what he says. There's something about the Anti politically correct attitude that I like.
VenomStryker 2 years ago 3
Though I like Neal, he is wrong about the number of votes in the general assembly. All countries get 1 vote in the general assembly.
But... the UN IS an outdated organization who uses a power structure that still resembles that of 1945.
spwebb7771 2 years ago
The UN is an outdated institution that gives a bigger-than-deserved voice to unelected dictatorships. a waste of our money/.
barelyillegal79 3 years ago 22
The US moral country which dusn attack anyone else? What about Iraq?
TitanicWarrior 3 years ago
yeah what about Iraq invading kuwait?
steverico 3 years ago
I never said Iraq was a moral country, I was just denying that the USA is a moral country.
TitanicWarrior 3 years ago
The US has been the most moral nation in history. Just look at our citizens, we give more to charities, national and international, than any other country. We had slaves and we freed them, now the ancestor of a slave is the president. Relative to other countries, America is extremely moral. Give me a break with your 'america is immoral' BS.
coitalyeti 3 years ago 2
Firstly, Barack Obama is not a decendant of slaves, check your facts.
Second, prove that you give most to charities, and then also compare the per head contributions to charity because most other countries have smaller populations but per head give way more then you.
Btw, it took you almost 100 years after you were created to abolish slavery. Dont give me the crap that your the most moral nation in history. Look at the CIA, your foriegn policy,Patriot Act, Guantanamo, Iraq, Vietnam etc
TitanicWarrior 3 years ago
One of the greatest leaders this world has ever seen sent forth by God was a decendant of slaves. Moses. Jesus, and all of his kings over the Jews were decendants of slaves. God chose decendants of slaves. Not the wealthy Egyptians or babylonians who were wealthy and the most so called edcuated in teh world at that time.
GracebeNancy 3 years ago
Screw god! What has "God" ever done for anyone. Seems like everytime something happens that people can't explain, they attribute it to "God"
If there really was a god that loved us as the Christians like to say, then why are there so much hate and suffering in the world. Why are there children in africa who'se parents die of AIDS and then they are forced to raise their siblings while still being a child themselves. That to me is not the work of a loving god.
VenomStryker 2 years ago
It time to dump the UN and get out it. It is useless. The US needs to not involve itself in international affairs of other countries.
ltexlaw 3 years ago 3
the UN is a joke....
it was created for use against us
woodham334 3 years ago 2
BOORTZ is just another fake conservative Neocon who gives lip service to social conservatives to get what is sacred to really sacred to the Neocons-more War for Oil and Israel. Also the "War on terror" is a fraud. You Tube WTC 7 collapse an its an obvious controlled demolition and there were explosives inside all the buildings.
KENA429 3 years ago
No it's not an obvious controlled detonation. Thousands of experts searching the ruins that find hydrocarbons from jet fuel burning, but no trace of explosives. Boortz is not a neocon, he is a libertarian. The United Nations sucks money and time from the US treasury while we provide nearly 70% funding for an organization that has never supported us, but instead has acted against us at every turn. Their policies and programs are wasteful and meaningless.
68W2M072 3 years ago
Heads of UN charity organizations make more than heads of state. The UN Intellectual Properties Bureau, for example, has fined the united states millions for american citizens caught illegally importing files through p2p programs, but american movies were found to be not liable for protection under the UN, because they "...originate from a country that can well afford a reduced profit margin." Well done, yet again, UN.
68W2M072 3 years ago
Also, Kena, I understand that the argument to stop the war on a people that has been kidnapping, bombing, raping, and just outright murdering our own people for the past 40 years is weak at best. But to try to strengthen your position by saying the nearly 3,000 people killed in 9/11 was anything other than yet another brutal tactic by a barbaric enemy is to dishonor their memory, and the memories of those that weren't so cowardly as you - and faced the evil of radical islam.
68W2M072 3 years ago
Also, Kena, I understand that the argument to stop the war on a people that has been kidnapping, bombing, raping, and just outright murdering our own people for the past 40 years is weak at best. But to try to strengthen your position by saying the nearly 3,000 people killed in 9/11 was anything other than yet another brutal tactic by a barbaric enemy is to dishonor their memory, and the memories of those that weren't so cowardly as you - and faced the evil of radical islam.
68W2M072 3 years ago
68W2M072, you are the coward. You live in denial and wont even take 1 minute to watch the WTC 7 COLLAPSE. Even a 12 yr old can figure its an obvious controlled demolition. YOU do dishonor to the victims of 911 by ignoring the evidence. Go ahead you cowardly fuck and live in Denial.
KENA429 3 years ago
I have watched the video, and many other videos concerning the WTC collapse. I also watched several videos with bigfoot and the lochness monster, even chupacabra. There is no justification or reason behind WTC being an inside job, but most of all, there is not even a shred of evidence. No evidence of WTC "coverup" has ever survived even the weakest scrutiny. The only "evidence" that remains today is in modified videos and a crackpot janitor that is making millions on testimonial videos.
68W2M072 3 years ago
Sorry, science says no.
amartin7889 3 years ago
Science says no what? There is no science debunking the 9/11 attacks. Produce this 'evidence,' I will show you how it is false. All the "truthseekers" have is fake edited videos on youtube, and those are horrible to days the least. Lets see some "science" behind your lies.
I dare you.
68W2M072 3 years ago
Oh, I agree with you. I accidently responded to you. The science disputes the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Even common sense should do that.
amartin7889 3 years ago
The UN is worthless , PULL OUT NOW!!
endtimer09 3 years ago 4
I thought we already have set up our own UN.
I thought Bush overthrew the UN.
The UN permits communists into US, like the Chinese diplomats.
Turn the UN into a hostel.
I think the UN should move out of New York.
To a peaceful safe country, like Cuba.
No terrorists bombings in Cuba.
REvamp the voting system.
openbrains 3 years ago
way to go Neal
drpepperpepsicoke 3 years ago 2
H. L. Menken warned us about Neal Boortz, those who claim to be defenders of Freedom will turn out to be its greatest enemies. A man who claims to be one of America's greatest patriots, but must have made a right turn at Los Angeles on his way to Vietnam. Sounds about right for a Reagan Supporter. Reagan, the former Life Guard and College Football player, who suddenly became 4-F in the face of Adolf Hitler. Yeah, a man of real principles.
bkohatl 3 years ago
So if the UN decides they have some great plan, you have ZERO HUMAN RIGHTS. Hell they could put you in slavery if they wanted to, take all your property, and do God knows what else.
The UN operates under the assumption that the people are given their rights by the government.
outrunner33 3 years ago 4
Then there's the outrageous, so called human rights.
The right to social security.
The right to work.
The right to protection against unemployment.
The right to a paid vacation.
The right to enjoy arts.
The right to an education.
But that's not the worst part. If you want to look it up, it's Article 29(3). It state:
"These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations."
Read that again, and make sure you understand it.
outrunner33 3 years ago 3
One document sums up the entire UN, and that's the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. President Clinton called it "one of the most important documents of human history". It list out the rights of all humans; some very similar to the US Bill of Rights.
The right to life liberty and security of person.
The right not to be held in slavery.
The right to privacy.
The right to a presumption of innocence.
The right to own property.
The right to freedom of opinion and expression.
outrunner33 3 years ago
Another UN scandal what a suprise.
robhiengler 3 years ago 2
You lie to start a war, invade a country who had done nothing to us, kill 1,000,000 people and we're the good guys?
This is exactly what George Orwell meant when he wrote 1984.
You guys see yourselves as a master race, not as a country of 300,000,000 in a world of 8,000,000,000 people. We make up 5% of the world's population and should act like it.
I remember reading one definition of intelligence, someone who listens more than they talk. I know what ignorance is...
bkohatl 3 years ago
What's the matter "bkohatl"... tin foil hat on too tight?? Following flawed intel is not lying... and the intel may have been more reliable if the Clinton admin had not undercut out ability to employ time proven tactics to gather intel. Sadam DID support Bin Laden's organization as well as terrorism in general. If you think THIS is Orwellian you need to read more... the Democrat party is the one pushing for an Orwellian "Thought Police"... (see 'hate-crimes' legisaltion)
aldentom 3 years ago
"This is exactly what George Orwell meant when he wrote 1984."
Wasn't Orwell writing about "Big Brother," aka the Government? I f'n hate the government, because it never knows it's boundaries, but your liberal-socialist Democrats are the biggest "Big Brother" (Government) lovers in the country.
What Orwell definitely WASN'T writing about was personal responsibility, capitalism, freedom. Orwell WASN'T writing about Libertarians.
BiggieB99 3 years ago
Super Patriot Neal Boortz and Neil Cavuto both Hawks on Defense and supporters of the war in Iraq both dodged military service in Vietnam.
Orwell was about people saying exactly the opposite of what they really mean. Or does Strong on Defense mean War Profiteer. Always remember former Football Player and Lifeguard got a studio Doctor to declare him 4-F. He didn't fight Hitler, no surprise there, is there.
bkohatl 3 years ago
The 4-F Football Player and Lifeguard is Ronald Reagan of course. Then again Rush Limbaugh played High School Football and got himself declared 4-F too. Funny, all these invalid Republican Hawks. Or is that cowards. Reagan should have fought to stop Hitler, no one had an excuse and he should have been ashamed of himself.
bkohatl 3 years ago
Fuck the U.N.
drpocketwatch 3 years ago 4
I love how the poster of this video tried to make people hate the right wing for wanting to get rid of the U.N. but instead got a bunch of people telling him/her that the U.N. is shit and that he's an idiot!
iiiiihexiiiii 3 years ago 2
foreal! "eyesonfox" video post backfired, seeing in the field of world peace and international diplomacy more gets done at the local tittie-club than the UN general assembly.
breal45 3 years ago 2
the united nations is a corrupt institution that serves no purpose, the recent scandal of "sex for food" proves that we have nothing to do there
Mosholu06 3 years ago 3
Ummm, news flash - No matter how much you hate FOX News, it doesn't make CNN and MSNBC any less pathetic in their own biases, period, end of story.
Maybe instead of foaming at the mouth with hatred, failing networks ought to look in the mirror at their own objectivity and ask why nobody watches them anymore?
So FOX is biased? Then move to the center and clean their clocks by attracting people whom want REAL FACTS instead of either conservative or LIBERAL propaganda? What a novel concept!
joesmoe71 3 years ago 3
We(Bush and his henchmen) came up with the idea(if you believe them) of invading Iraq to liberate them, they didn't ask us in. Iraq wasn't a center of terrorism before we invaded, now it is. We "liberated" Afghanistan: turned it into the world's largest supplier of Heroin. We are becoming very consistant, taking a bad situation and making it worse.
The Oil in Iraq belongs to the Iraqi People, is we take it then we are thieves. Which explains why it is the #1 Target of Insurgents.
bkohatl 3 years ago
Herr Adolf Hitler work to destroy the League of Nations before the beginning of World War II. His purpose in his own words was to prevent organized opposition to Nazi Germany. After George Bush invaded Iraq to steal Oil, having killed 1,000,000 Iraqi people, George W. Bush and His Henchman, especially John Bolton, have worked to destroy the UN for the same reason. If you see Neal Boortz, give him a Sieg Heil, Herr Boortz, he'll feel right at home and it will bring back memories of hsi past.
bkohatl 3 years ago
You liberals are the Nazis for supporting the UN. The UN hates Jews, makes excuses for terrorists and dictators, hates America, and steals from charities.
StoogeWatcher 3 years ago
We should dump the UN for superceding the Constitution of the United States, and attempting to force far-left policy's on the American people, namely, gun control.
Since when do other nations get to decide OUR domestic policy? There's no "humanitarian" crises here, just the ol' UN meddling in our country.
puresrtrash 3 years ago
Another UN scandal?!? NO WAY!
The UN is worthless, the US should dump them... Maybe the UN can move to Zimbabwe.. it will feel at home with 3rd world murderous dictators.
soma187 3 years ago 2
UN 'accomplishments': Corruption, rape, racism, anti-Semitism, defending terrorists, making excuses for Communist dictators.
StoogeWatcher 3 years ago
he called her ghetto trash not slut. and its free speech so he had no reason to say sorry even though he later did.
wombat1622 3 years ago
1. nations like zimbabwe have the same vote as us? Yes, neal, one nation one vote. Kinda like
4ourthofjuly 4 years ago
a democracy.
2. try living without a UN without being an economic or military power. it would probably be useful.
3. since boortz said cynthia mckinney looked like a "ghetto slut", it wouldnt be too low to mention that he's dressed like a male prostitute here.
not that i have a problem with that.
4ourthofjuly 4 years ago
LOL i love Boortz but he should not be flaunting his collar like that LOL
pumapaulwaul 4 years ago
Neal Boortz is the best talk show host out there - he is blunt, honest, and doesn't tow party lines.
The Fair Tax is a great idea, and would do more to help this country than the incredibly crippling, Marxist tax code we have now.
WilB1972 4 years ago 7
Death to the United Nazis!
DarcPrynce 4 years ago
lol...you dont know what a nazi is or what it means to be a nazi.
chickharmony 3 years ago
The UN is Nazi for its hatred of Jews and support of jihadists and dictators.
StoogeWatcher 3 years ago
do not use aggression.... we're out
chemturtles 4 years ago
Boortz is a self described Libertarian. Libertarians are hardly "Right-Wingers".
steve0281 4 years ago 3
Boortz is hardly a Libertarian.
Juanmag84 4 years ago
He is more accurately described as a "neo-Libertarian". I know, I know, I never heard of that before either but I looked it up. On certain core essentials they agree with mainstream Libertarianism but they have an interventionist foreign policy agenda. That seems rather contrary to the Libertarianism that I subscribe to but they clearly fall under the same tent philosophically in nearly all other aspects.
steve0281 4 years ago
seems to me all valid points...
1Natecore 4 years ago
the us won't even fit in its own new un.
Zoober0001 4 years ago 2
Dump the UN. Freedom for the people, not the elite.
ynnyytty 4 years ago
Of course UN is corrupt -- what human group is NOT? Look at congress. Look at your local government, look at any place that has money and status involved, and you will have cheatin lying bastards. But thats mankind. Its real hard to get rabbits to run these things.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
Im always amazed that stupid people have so much in common. They all seem to want to get rid of UN, they all love the Fair tax, and they all believe every conspiracy that other stupid people dream up. I sense a pattern.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
Before you get rid of the UN cause Boortz says so, better find out how rational this huckster is, in his wacko wacko Flat tax nonsense. If he is misleads stupid people about that, he will mislead stupid people about UN too.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
Why the hell should we be in the UN? Has it done anything to better the world?
Deeganmb 4 years ago
Thank you "eyesonfox" for giving me a youtube sight that I can see all my favorite people from FNC.
dirtystinknape 4 years ago
The "fair and balanced" thing only applies to news reports, not to opinion pieces. Why does this fact elude so many people? Columns in newspapers are comprised of opinions, as well, and should not be deemed "articles." The fact that so few people can distinguish between news and editorial items is yet another testament to the failure of government schools.
abaxteria 4 years ago
Fair and balanced? Are you mental? Only applies to news reports? We finally got FOX and I was very eager to see it. The FIRST DAY i watched it, the weather guy -- THE WEATHER GUY-- asked during the WEATHER -"why do democrats hate america?". HItler type guy couldnt fool Americans now -- but slick hate mongers like FOX, could. Yes, they have some great shows, Beltway boys, stock shows. But Im smart enough to handle it. Frankly, most people arent.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
Abax -- the fact that you dont know what the hell you are talking about should embarrass the hell out of you. Its a testiment to your lousy education, and your self delusion. Fox has blurred its news and editorials. Better go get your junior college tuition back. Maybe use it to read a book or two.
MarkDouglasC 4 years ago
Why so hostile? Have you not noticed how opinions have increasingly crept into network news reports over the past few decades? Yet I hear so few comparisons between left-wing news people and Hitler. And the gratuitous use of Hitler comparisons is the intellectual equivalent of hollering a bad word and then running away. By the way, I worked as a print journalist and news editor for years. Your spelling and punctuation drive home the aforementioned point about government schools.
abaxteria 4 years ago
LOL "Do not use aggression against other countries." I guess the US will not be eligible to this new club neither.
lindaabc123 4 years ago
I challenge ANY UN supporter to name one recent accomplishment of the UN.
StoogeWatcher 4 years ago 2
WWIII has not happened, and if we listened to them we wouldnt be in iraq and we would have saved 700000 iraqi lives and 4000 american lives.
samcfadden 4 years ago
You can thank JFK and RWR for defeating the communist threat with strong military authority supported by economic dominance. It was less than 200k lives lost. Slightly more than the numbers of women imprisoned in rape camps that we freed. But what the hell... What American should care about that?
LoTMyle 4 years ago
rape camps, really? i thought it was WMDs but whats the difference. its not like JFK used the UN to resolve the cuban missile crisis, or that both WWI and WWII were both enabled because there was no strong international governing body. and were not talking about communists were talking about WWIII. and no militarism does not keep peace. it only means we all die faster or more efficiently.
samcfadden 4 years ago
The worst thing we ever did was create the U.N
overpaidrockstar 4 years ago 11
wow, eyesonfox, do you just hate America so much that you have to call stuff like this bad? It's "left-winged propangda" like the crap you're spreading in reference to this that's destroying America! If you don't like the USA, then get out!
chwparker 4 years ago 5
Don't forget that the MoveOn Democrats and Charles Rangel think wealthy people should be punished by raising taxes. This also includes any American who saves money and invests. Think about it. They want to punish us for saving money and investing by paying higher taxes to fund their pork and earmarks, but lower taxes for the poor who don't save and spend every single penny they make.
matty42069 4 years ago 2
MoveOn doesn't hate the rich. Otherwise, they wouldn't idolize Ted Kennedy.
StoogeWatcher 4 years ago
Right, they do idolize a rich guy who gets away with killing a girl while drunk driving. The MoveOn democrats have a wide array of moral and ethical leaders with Ted Kennedy leading the way. How about Bill Clinton? They hold him in high regard too.
matty42069 4 years ago
Politicians are all scum. When we all bypass this idea that you must belong to one political side at all costs?
ateamga 4 years ago
'world democracy'.....i think i've to throw up, why don't we put all the greedy humans on 2 islands, call it 'twin powers', and build up community again in the western world, starting with throwing your television into the garbage......but no, you want 'world democracy'....
mango005 4 years ago
Do any of you even know what this "neo" prefix is? I rather doubt it.
SkyhawkFlyer 4 years ago
Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US!
StoogeWatcher 4 years ago 3
Equally right-wing Neal Boortz? You're a moron and typical liberal. Neal is a Libertarian and, for example, wants to legalize marijuana and other drugs. Hardly an "equally right-wing" view buddy. And Neal criticizes both left and right all the time on his radio show. Go drink some kool-aid with your liberal pals.
matty42069 4 years ago 3
He's what I'd like to call a neo-libertarian. He has libertarian views on domestic policy and neo-conservative views on foreign policy. Ron Paul. Now that's a real libertarian.
columbusclipper 4 years ago
You're a moron.
camerakid400 4 years ago
I honestly don't think Americans are aware of how their country is beginning to die. I think we're seeing the end of the United States as a world leader. If I look around the world now, I can't think of a single country that stands by America.
I'm a Brit, supposedly the USA's biggest ally and even we don't want to be part of that political agenda. It's like your nation is becoming a right-wing version of the old Soviet Union.
NobodyBlessAtheism 4 years ago
I agree. A corporate-fascist-socialist state consisting of the rich and the poor. That's America.
columbusclipper 4 years ago
We should get out of the UN.
ottovw 4 years ago 5
very profound. and i asume everyone has forgotten why the UN was created. the same reason why the leage of nations was created and look what happened then when we did not participate in that.
samcfadden 4 years ago
Ghandi, MLK...examples of peace winning out? How naive are you? While they were great men, it wasn't their peaceful resistance so much as the aggressive and violent reactions to these movements. Images of dogs attacking black people and police using fire hoses against peaceful protesters did far more to change racial attitudes in this country.
theadwaterfrequency 4 years ago
that is what peaceful resistince is. martin luther king and gandhi knew what they were walking into they knew they would go to jail get death threats and be beaten and they were still peaceful.
samcfadden 4 years ago
so far you have named cases where peace was achieved by plea and negotiation with a western government and or culture and a democracy in both cases.
ymp5000 4 years ago
what came out of europe from the fall of rome to the reformation, what came out of europe? and yea we were civil with gandhi, martin luther king i mean it wasnt like gandhi worked for 30 years before britain left india and the british never massecred indians protestors, and i mean we didnt use attack dogs or hoses on martin luther king i mean its not like we had senoters say segragation now segragation tommorow segregation forever.
samcfadden 4 years ago
now your just rambling....good by
ymp5000 4 years ago
what came out of europe in the dark ages nothing thats why its called the dark ages. but the dark ages only refers to roman cathlic europe.
samcfadden 4 years ago
The U.N. is a joke. Anyone who discredits someone for speaking against that disgusting group of Demogogues is an idiot and a light-weight. I do not pledge myself to the U.N. only America. I know how much Liberals hate America and worship the U.N, you political whores.
TheAmericanManifesto 4 years ago 2
for over 50 years now japan has been live with its neighbors in peace with only political conlfict with n.korea.why is that?
ymp5000 4 years ago
Gandhi got rights for minorities in south africa and then got britain out of india with peaceful resistance, then some war monger thought war was a better option and shot him and you have unresolved problems in the kashmir. nelson mandela ended apairtied, and when he got power did not have a blood bath of justice. so yeah peace never worked.
samcfadden 4 years ago
the britts have a bill of rights also.actualy they coined the term.peace does work when one side is willing to listen but saddam didnt listen.nelson ended apartides yes buthe was not such a peacefull man and you know that,just because he didnt go on a rampage afterwards is not any indication of him being a gentle person.
ymp5000 4 years ago
no,i do not believe that war creats peace.peace is what you get if the good guys win.if the bad guys win then you just get more jihad.tell me,when was there a conflict between two nations that was settled and stayed settled by a brokerd peace agreement and no military comflict?how long did that last?
ymp5000 4 years ago
the questin you should ask is not how many times has peace worked it should be how many times was it tried. but if you really want one the civil rights era with martin luther king.
samcfadden 4 years ago
that only worked because they had protection under the contitution and the bill of rights.but still one must remember that we are talking about a man who killed 100,000 people inside his own borders.
ymp5000 4 years ago
remember you are talking about a man who killed around 100,000 of his own people and lobbed mistles at his neighbor for no reason after invading another.
ymp5000 4 years ago
you talk about how saddam attacked iran? is that not what you want to do. also who gave saddam the weapons that he attacked iran with o yeah it was us, oops. i believe dick cheney himself in 1994 said that it would not be reasonable to take out saddam after the first gulf war. because there would be a civil war and you couldnt replace it with a goverment and quote a "Quagmire"
samcfadden 4 years ago
no,i was talking about how during dessert storm sadda has lobing mistles into isreal and they did even have a dog in the fight.i do not defend nixons retarded idea that he could have a dictator for a pet but at least we are making an attempt to fix it now.whats wrong with trying to fix a f*#kup?
ymp5000 4 years ago
ok,you got me on the date.i always think of the rise of islam as being part of the dark ages and for the record going war was one of the first things islam did.now,if you have a dictator who has already demonstrated a lact of humanity and has thrown off the surrender agreement that he himself signed and has refused 14 times to come into compliance there can be but one way to deal with a person like that
ymp5000 4 years ago
you do know the term dark ages refers to roman cathlic europe not the islamic empire. you know why because at that time when all the christains did was war, the muslims made major advances in science, math, astronamy, they preserved the greek and roman classics and the created the hospital. its what is called a golden age.
samcfadden 4 years ago
yes i do (from 470 something a.d. to around 1,000 a.d.) and the term "dark ages" is used to convey the lact of recorded history from western europe after the fall of the roman empire and it was not such a backward era as is the popular miscaonception.
ymp5000 4 years ago
what part of "we are commited" do you have a problem with? we cam with a promise of freedom nad now we have to make good on it or the close to 4000 troops that we have lost so far will be for nothing at all.
ymp5000 4 years ago
second our president says were fighting for freedom but to fight this war he gets rid of basic freedoms and rights to his own people. your retarted if you believe war can achieve peace. you can bomb the world to pieces, but you cant bomb it to peace.
samcfadden 4 years ago
bumper sticker come on its a simple truth, do you really believe war makes peace. o and nice example because we all know the police have a wonderful history of keeping the peace i mean just look at the civil rights era. now my questin is do you think the UN was wrong by telling us not to invade iraq, or are you just ignoring it.
samcfadden 4 years ago
WAKE UP!!!! they declared war on us back in the 70's. they have been at war with us for over 1400yrs. if we do not stomp this out now our children and grandchildren and so will inherit this problem. and it is by no meens a disaster.we were in vietnam for 8 years and lost over 50,000 men.we can do this.hell it may well be over now if the libbs werent working night and day trying to get in our own troops way.
ymp5000 4 years ago
we lost in vietnam that war was fought by us for 10 years. and before by france for 4 years. 50,000 troops died because america decided it would fight anything called communist regardless of why these countrys were becoming communist. wait it has been 1400 years since the 70's i think you made an error in your math. war is stupid its senseless the troops in iraq are dying for nothing. why may you ask because the war in iraq is first of all illegal.
samcfadden 4 years ago
cute catch frazes.look who is fighting a bumpersticker war now.islam started highjacking planes back in the 70 but islam has been at war with the west for over 1400 years (535ad) stupid.andi if this war is SOOOOO illegal than you can blame 90% of you beloved retard democrats because they vopted for it stupid. but yes you cxan inforce peace stupid, the police do it every day stupid.and sometimes they have to shoot someo one to keep that peace stupid.get you head out of you own butt.
ymp5000 4 years ago
i see your problem your not thinking logically. you see heres one of your points "if this war is SOOOOO illegal than you can blame 90% of you beloved retard democrats" ok so what that does not mean anything its a true statement sure the democrats have some fault in this. so what is your point, you dont have one. if your gonna give a date make sure its right islam started in 613 AD, STUPID.
samcfadden 4 years ago
all religious and communist based goverments exist in defiance of freedom and all that is humane. they hate cappitalism and democracy because they are power hungry and thing only a select few citizens fave any control on government and every one else has to eat it. would you want to live like that?
ymp5000 4 years ago
peace is what you get after the bad guys get the crp kicked out of them retard. you cant talk sence into the head of a cromag who wears a towl on his head and uses his left hand for toilet paper, it just wont work. peace must be inforced witht the threat and when needed the use of violence.
ymp5000 4 years ago
US OUT OF US AND US OUT OF UN! The UN rapes girls, steals aid, is full of deadbeats, hates America, supports dictators, and makes excuses for terrorists. Ironically, the US is the largest donor to the UN.
StoogeWatcher 4 years ago
hmm you are an ass monkey. this is not fair and balancedhow? cause they have a conservative commentator? u ever watch mslsd??you are an idiot. please stop polluting your mind.
blktan22 4 years ago
wait the USA is going to start a new UN for countrys that do not use aggresion? doesnt that exclude us.
samcfadden 4 years ago
saddam was told by the UN 14 times and threatened with force 14 times to let the inspectors back in but he did not,you want to blame some one for the war in iraq....blame saddam,but we gave him 14 chances
ymp5000 4 years ago
umm yea remember how the UN told us that the war in iraq would be a disastor and then we ignored them, and then it was a disaster. just because you threaten some one it doesnt make invading a country any more justified. your other comment makes sense if you want peace you create war. kind of like when i want when i want to eat a pint of ben and jerrys i give up eating ice cream.
samcfadden 4 years ago
OMFG what will it take to convince you and the retard sudo-libs like to wake up and know that there will always be those who will never embrace freedom and will always try to kill it no matter what YOU say about it. you can toalk youre self out of every thing.
ymp5000 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
well if you want peace you dont create war.
samcfadden 4 years ago
If you lean to the left or the right, the UN hasn't done one positive thing in a very long time.
bron86co 4 years ago
p.s if you're going to sit up here and call me a liberal because i see right from wrong and stupid from smart then it only shows your own stupidity. you stand in a crowd no matter what just because it's the agenda no matter what the facts are. that's peer pressure! that's ignorance! that's dogma! that's actually religion! i'll be the first person to say liberals make me sick. from gay marriage to open borders.
rOaCh2000 4 years ago
why do people believe peace initiatives involves bombs?
rOaCh2000 4 years ago
Peace is served like this...an islamic extremists (the enemy for you goverment educated)is blown up or shot and killed. The enemy is destroyed, this individual will no longer distrupt peace. Is this broken down enough for you bed wetting liberal?
rthomas2471 4 years ago
does saddam include extremists? does iran and syria include extremists? oh right radical islam the sect that doesn't exist. i guess installing the shah of iran and refusing to send him back to iran for execution has nothing to do with it. peace doesn't involve bombs or regime changes. peace involves dialogue i'm sorry that i offend your almost satanic and unjesus like rhetoric about bombing millions of people
rOaCh2000 4 years ago
yeah that's right! dubya's going to lead a large "peace initiative" into iran and start ww3. and another "peace initiative" into syria and possibly pakistan. but i guess you're the one in the right here. afterall war is peace ;)
rOaCh2000 4 years ago
GO BOORTZ!!! The UN is a joke...
TheArcher6999 4 years ago
hey orwellian shithead! according to your own logic america and israel should not be included into the un!
rOaCh2000 4 years ago
as Dave Mustaine would say "United Abomination"
LuthierJustin 4 years ago