The interviewer didn't tell Jowenko that WTC 7 had major fires raging in it (according to FDNY), that in footage with sound there is no sign of detonation charges, or that the collapse was expected by FDNY & other experts on the scene. He didn’t tell him there was no trace of detonation charges in the seismic record. So he didn’t have all the info that would have been useful to make a judgment. And if you think Jowenko is credible, note that he says WTC 1 & 2 were NOT demolitions.
There appears to be NO END to the murders first perpetrated by GW Bush and Larry Silverstein on 11 September 2001; continuing through the present. A very good and hard working man such as Danny Jowenko; ruthlessly authorized to be murdered by Soetoro-Obama. It is Obama who claimed to have killed Osama-bin Laden in May 2011; the man actually having died in 2002. Obama is an ILLEGAL ALIEN, having never been naturalized. He is also a MURDERER bent on living off of the PEOPLE; BUSH=OBAMA=PLAGUE
All demo experts are working at WalMart now, since they discovered that merely setting a building on fire will make it collapse perfectly into its own footprint.
This part of the Jowenko interview is always taken out of context and misrepresents what he said and thought. You need to watch the whole thing from start to finish to fully understand why this is the case, however.
@Prancer1231 Well his death certainly is suspicious, but I'll leave it at that. "Murdered" is the first thing that popped into my mind but then again, accidents do happen.
And 9/11 was NOT an inside job. 9/11 was a Mossad operation, plain and simple.
@LettersOfCentinel76 Since Jowenko states that a controlled demolition of WTC 1 & 2 would have been impossible, and if he had known the scope of the WTC7 fires and seen the video that included the earlier penthouse collapse, he would have come to the same conclusion concerning B7, who would you suspect?
@lijebaley01 9/11 was done by the Israeli Mossad. Exactly how they orchestrated it is of no major relevance to me. I am aware that Jowenko believed that WTC 1 and 2 were taken down by planes, but he was adamant that WTC7 was taken down by controlled demolition.
On 9/11 five Mossad agents set up a video camera and recorded the attacks. After the second plane hit they celebrated. They were arrested and secretly deported to Israel.
@LettersOfCentinel76 Sorry, we see why he formed his opinion. He was told there were hardly no fires... he was told the collapse took 7 seconds, when the visible collapse started 7 seconds earlier. Had he know the scope of the fires, and the earlier interier collapse, he would have emphatically denied a controlled demolition was possible. You will never agree about it, and I don't give a crap what you believe. The proof of lies is right there for everyone to see.
@lijebaley01 clearly you lack a basic understanding of physics, and the path of least resistance. for that building to have collapsed into its own foot print without even touching any of the buildings around it, every single core column would have to have been severed almost simultaneously, within milliseconds of each other in order to do that. any delay in one of the columns would have made it tilt over to the side.
@lijebaley01 by your logic, we should just set every building on fire that's scheduled to be demolished, instead of spending hundreds of man hours and tens of thousands of dollars, taking a team of experts to bring down a building using explosives. what you're saying is absolutely nonsensical
@lijebaley01 On Israeli TV they were later interviewed. They said that they were posing as art students but were really Mossad agents sent to America to document 9/11.
@lijebaley01 No suspects. Control Demolition Inc. (CDI), a US Government classified contract implosion company (the best in the world) implements all US implosion work (see CDI-Government). Authorization for demolition of WTC-1, 2 7 and 6 was issued by GW Bush, in conjuction with Larry Silverstein (owner of WTC Lease) and his 26 July 2001 terrorist insurance. Go to Clifford Anthony Paiva FACEBOOK under PHOTOS Government Murder and Corruption. Bin Laden died 2002.
funny how the smart people are left out of the official story! real experts know this was an inside job, those paid off knows it too but could not say it
WTC7 fell SYMETRICALLY in FREE FALL SPEED into its own FOOTPRINT. EXPLOSIONS were heard/seen/documented, and EXPLOSIV RESIDUE has been found in WTC dust.
A 5 year old can see this was a controlled demolition, 1600 architects and engineers can see this was a controlled demolition and any C.D expert Dany Jowenko saw this was a controlled demo.
You forgot to mention whether or not Jawenko knew B7 was on fire. See, if had known, he would have said a CD would have been impossible for the same reason he said a CD of WTC1&2 were impossible.
@lijebaley01 One year after this interview, he had read the official NIST explanation and still reaffirmed his conclusions in a phone interview with blogger Jeff Hill. When asked if he stuck by his assertion that Building 7 was brought down with explosives, Jowenko replied with one word: "Absolutely." He went on to refute NIST's theory of a fire-induced collapse, stating that "I've looked at the drawings, at the construction, and it couldn't have been done by fire."
@The911watch I just listened to the phone interview again, and nowhere does he say he read and understood the NIST report. According to NIST the building would have fallen independent of any fires. All that was needed was the failure of column 79. Again, he said the CD of 1 and 2 were impossible and among his reasons is the fires would have destroyed the ignitors. If he had known the scope of the fires he would have said the same of building 7.
@ThisPageStaysREAL You can not find one instance where I have lied. Wanna know why? It's because I do not lie. I challenge you to find one lie from me.
@lijebaley01 no problem, I say you are lying about having reproduced the holes in the iron that Nist attributed to water, gypsum and fire, they never proved this with experiment, yet..you claimed it was simple and that you had done so in a campfire of all places. I point to a documented video which tries to validate the Nist claim, but cannot. Yet you say you have done it. Id offer a complete retraction and genuine apology if you in fact recorded and proved your claim to be the truth.
@ThisPageStaysREAL No, she it for brains... My experiment showed accelerated oxidation over a very short time, under conditions much less severe than that of ground zero. It is easily verified. I am going to try it again at room temperature to see if it is proven under conditions even a person of your means and ingenuity can repeat.
@lijebaley01 No sorry it doesn't work that way. I had asked you a direct question after you made the statement that the holes in the steel, (referred to as swiss cheese) by Nist, were easily reproducable. I then asked you 2 additional times if you were sure, the second time i even added "you're not lying right?" because i have already seen an attempted reproduction with conditions far more extreme than 9/11 fail to produce that effect. So you saying it does, is nonsense w/o video documentation.
@ThisPageStaysREAL No, moron, I never said anything beyond stating you can get accelerated oxidation from the materials present. I don't doubt for one second that the steel they tested showed accelerated oxidation when they were done. Now you seem to have devine knowledge of the conditions that created the questionable steel. Guess what idiot. It wasn't thermite that did it.
@lijebaley01 See.. just like every other clown on i come across, as soon as you're out of valid points, or get caught in your own bullshit you begin this fucking name calling. As if we were face to face i wouldnt slap the shit outta you. Moron, Idiot, etc. You used the term swiss cheese, refers to holes in the god damn steel. and NIST couldnt reproduce what they stated.. You said you pulled it off using a campfire, and i called bullshit.If you cant provide proof, just say so. be a man sweetheart
@ThisMoronStaysIgnorant You don't read too well do you? You lack the intelligence to address anything I have said. You called me a liar, now prove something that I said to be a lie. I found accelerated oxidation in my experiment. Do you even understand what that means?
@lijebaley01 yawn... i know what it doesn't mean, it doesnt mean anything close to twisted steel with fat holes in it described as swiss cheese by observers. Which is what you hinted you were able to achieve in a campfire. So are you gonna record your lil' demo and upload it or just dance around the question from time to time?
Mr. "LOL" here is a common Zionist hasbara troll who lies for False Flag mass murderers of Americans, but what is especially disgusting is that he does it posing as an American veteran.
That's right, USS LIBERTY was another Zionist False Flag mass murder, same as September 11
Regarding your 'loyalty'; Four unarmed American civilians have been shot in the face in four separate incidences by IDF Jews since a Russian immigrant IDF Jew murdered Rachel Corrie in 2003.
One of the Americans was murdered with three shots to the face from point blank after being gunned down in the back.
Do you agree that IDF Jews are sadistic terrorists whom the USofA needs to strike down?
"The USS Liberty Memorial web site abhors the racist and extreme positions taken by anti-Semitic, Anti-Zionist, Holocaust denial, conspiracy theorist and other such groups which often seek to identify with us and to usurp our story as their own. "
What "Holocaust"? Eisenhower, Churchill, and de Gualle each wrote memoirs about the second world war totaling over 7000 pages published as late as 1959. They never once mention a '6 million' victimized Jews, a 'genocide' of Jews, or a 'gas chamber'.
The first time gas chambers were mentioned in a film about WWII wasn't until 1972. The word 'holocaust' wasn't used in films until the late 1970s
You can't post a single undeniable gassing of anyone.
on page 223 of “Dear General: Eisenhower’s Wartime Letters to Marshall,”
Eisenhower wrote: "The visual evidence and the verbal testimony of starvation, cruelty and bestiality were so overpowering as to leave me a bit sick. In one room, where they [there] were piled up twenty or thirty naked men, killed by starvation, George Patton would not even enter. He said that he would get sick if he did so."
Google it, because the NEXT sentence is WONDERFUL.
EISENHOWER wrote "I made the visit [to Gotha] deliberately, in order to be in a position to give first-hand evidence of these things if ever, in the future, there develops a tendency to charge these allegations merely to “propaganda.”
page 223 of “Dear General: Eisenhower’s Wartime Letters to Marshall,”
I believe Gen. Eisenhower is referring to you there, little Nazi Boy.
LMAO, Danny Jowenko claimed WTC 1 and WTC 2 were NOT controlled demolition, but his first glance at WTC 7's limited clip, and NO PRIOR knowledge that the building had BURNED for 8 hours is ignored by 9/11 Truthers. That's why he is surprised that the demolition is done in one day.
He asks THREE times, because He knows that's impossible.
What the video doesn't show is Danny explaining how he knew nothing about WTC7 before the interview, that Danny only saw that limited (cut!) clip of WTC7 from one angle with no other information, Danny stating that he didn't know how it collapsed (how could he know?) but that he has not enough info to draw any conclusion.
He sees only a tiny clip and based on that he says it looks like a CD job. Thats it. It sickens me to see how Truthers try to make their case twisting a dead man's words.
closing your mind to the possibility that maybe this WAS an inside job is pure ignorance. Don't just believe what the media tell you! Make you're own opinion about what happend.
but what's certain is that too many innocent people died, while the nation helplessly watched. RIP to all those who died on 9/11 <3
The US government with ALL the experts in ALL fields of studies cannot fucking explain why the building collapsed in free-fall manner? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ....You gotta be the most retarded douche to buy the official story.
3. Typical CLEAR demo kink clearly seen in the middle of the building
4.Demo squibs can be seen CLEARLY in one of the angles of the collapse
5. Silverstein, owner of all 3 buildings negotiates the insurance on them 3 weeks prior to include "terrorist attacks", and made him billions.
6. Oh and of course he said pull it like a fucking idiot. Damn evil elite sociopaths can't even keep their heads straight on in following interviews, and over the years.
But the official report agrees the columns went. So as this dude didn't hear the bangs nor did anyone see any cords or explosives, it is meaningless as contradictory evidence.
Besides how come none of you WTC7 crazies can answer the key question? If it shouldn't have come down but had explosives in it, why did so many firefighters and police see it creaking and bulging and say beforehand it would come down? Is that coincidence?
It is NOT documented that they "saw it creaking and bulging". Non one has ever stated that on the clips at the scene or eluded to that. The ONLY thing that's documented is them saying "it's coming down", "that buildings gonna be coming down soon". The building would come down with SOME resistance at the very least. It should topple to the sides and around a little, at the very least. But no, people want to be brain dead, or paid shills and say what you say.
@OneBigRetard Ok, so we're all supposed to believe your dumb ass (with the handle"OneBigRetard") and ignore one of the top demolitions experts in Europe... yeah, good idea...
Truther 101. Ignore the valid question I asked and move on to personal insults.
Are you really comfortable living like that? An ad hom and an appeal to authority and no attempt to actually find your own truth.
I repeat " If it shouldn't have come down but had explosives in it, why did so many firefighters and police see it creaking and bulging and say beforehand it would come down? Is that coincidence?"
Well, Jowenko wasn't really a key WITNESS. Yet he's an expert which view on the WTC 7 "collapse" is crucial to the world's oppinion on 9/11 - which means "just as dangerous to them as witnesses such as Jennings etc." So of course they had to kill him.
I live in san francisco whare a new portion of the bay bridge is being built. yesterday as i was driving over the bridge i noticed they were using steel beams to build the bridge. at some time in the future there will have to be a car fire on that bridge that would make the entire bridge blow up right? i mean we learned this is scientific fact after 9/11!! i cant believe the designer of the bridge didnt take that into consideration.
and now he's dead, SURPRISE! people are so stupid, they just watch 'news' on tv and belive the tales. thats all just a huge version of a bad written hollywood script
this poor man.. all he was trying to do was tell the people the truth. It was obviously blown up and it didn't burn down. This is such a crazy world and the only way people will stop speaking the truth is when their lives are in danger, because, sadly, there are.
Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko was killed a car accident Saturday in the Netherlands. He was reportedly driving from church when he collided head-on with a tree. There was also a dog in the car who survived.
and the 9/11 key witnesses experts who speak out keep dying. This could be a coincidence of course, but at this point I doubt it. I'm gonna look into it..
@decoysbyschmidt How typical heh? That's one of the favorite way of TPTB to eliminate whistleblowers. Fortunely we have his honest statement on tape and everyone should watch it to honor his death.
@Merlin5by5 what the fuck are you talking about? When did I say he was assasinated?
No wonder the masses still believe in the official story and get suckered into nonsensical wars, manipulated by the media, when people are as dumb as you.
@Merlin5by5 Please explain why we invaded Iraq, and what was the connection between Iraq and 9-11? Could it be that was just a bunch of lies served to the gullible, dumb masses who believes whatever their TV tells them (like you) ?
Or what about Afghanistan? why are we attacking Taliban when it was supposedly Al qaeda (all Saudies) that attacked us. Could that also be some bullshit they told you because they had planned attacking afghanistan long before 9-11?
@Merlin5by5 Wow, I've been reading your comments, and you seriously have some psycological problems:
- "Can you swallow my cum now, Bitch?"???
You sound like a fucked up marine who've been induced to to much pschycological trauma. Get your head checked.
Start listening to the over 1600 Architects and engineers, who have scientific evidence 9-11 was an inside job. You'll see your war time psychological trauma is a result of your country's fals flag attack on its own people.
The NIST chart of WTC 7s Gravitational fall, is at NCSTAR 1A, page 46, Figure 3-15,
charted TWO years prior to DavidRChandler, it patiently explains that the building was falling for EIGHT seconds
before DavidRChandler even begins his attempt at timing the Northwest corner with PHYSICS Toolkit, a high school phsyics tool published by an educational arm of NIST, LOL.
@Merlin5by5 "Engineers on Youtbube"?? Is that an academy ? Ridiculous.
It was David Chandler that made NIST revide their graph, that they corrected in the final report. They still admit to freefall. Guess you bumbed out on that one.
Steven Jones and all the other scientists got one of their sample from Jeanett Mckinley. Several other scientists have gotten their sample from her and found the same thing. YOU can get one if you want.
@Merlin5by5 (continued from last comment) You still haven't explained why NIST admits to freefall ACCELERATION on stage 2 of the collapse on graph 3-15 of their final report, and how on earth is that even possible without the use of explosivs?
HEY, by the way, Did I mention that TWO scientific editors REJECTED and Resigned over Open Bentham publishing, for $800, in EGYPT, at MIDNIGHT, the Steven Jones Report?
I am going to go out on a LIMB here, and call that a BAD peer review, LOL.
@Merlin5by5 Hey do you know that paper has been peer riewed multiple times? not only by Bentham but also by "the Environmentalist" as well as the by the Chair of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at BYU. So get real.
As to the samples, there are num,erous samples and its not only steven jones. Mark Basil got a sample from Jeanett mckinley and one from a 9-11 museum. Again. get yourself a sample and look for yourself.
@The911watch (continued from last comment 2) This is what NIST say in their final about the WTC7 collapse:
"in stage 2, the northface descended at gravitational acceleration as the buckled columns provided neglible support to the upper portion of the north face. This free fall continued for 32 m"
So they DO admit to free fall, as well as an accelerated collapse. Mind explaining how on earth that is possible, when collapsing through the path of most resistance, unless explosivs were used ???
@Merlin5by5 What ? governement organisation refute nano thermate? How bizarre. I have seen no link, no article or proof of what you are saying. What I have seen are different scientists (from Jones to Harrit, to Mark Basil) who have all seen the same thing, providing pictures, documentation, as well as graphs.
You still haven't explained how WTC7could have fallen in free fall speed without explosivs.
You are a fucking SHILL. I've seen you on many vids, trying to debunk 9-11 truth.
LMAO, it's NOT just the government organizations. The US Science establishment roundly rejects Controlled Demolition, and Nano thermite is STILL manufactured in tiny quantitities by a PROTOTYPE lab setup at the US Navy's Powder explosive lab at Indian Head, SC. HERE is proof of that.
WTC, NANO THERMITE, 2002 THERMITE PRODUCTION PROCESS, LIMITS ON P45
ammtiac. alionscience. co m /pdf/ AMPQ6_1ART06. p df
It would take 500 years to make ONE TON of nano thermite. Big Fail, LOL
@Merlin5by5 Hey SHILL, I've posted this before, but you seem to ignore it. This is from the NIST final report of the WTC7 collapse:
"in stage 2, the northface descended at gravitational acceleration as the buckled columns provided neglible support to the upper portion of the north face. This free fall continued for 32 m"
NIST admits to free fall acceleration. OK?
Now explain how a building can collapse in accelerated free fall through the path of most resistance without explosivs?
What??? the floors wouldn't slow down the collapse? so basically 47 floors provides as much resistance as thin air? you are so full of bullshit.
Funny how you refuted the freefall some comments ago, but now that I provided the NIST quote admiting its frefall, its suddenly ok for a building to crush itself through 47 stories as fast as through thin air.
You are ridiculous.
I've googled your profile Merlin5by5. You are a fucking shill and you disgust me.
@Merlin5by5 Fuck off, you just keep changing your arguments, and contradicting yourself.
NIST calculated the GLOBAL COLLAPSE time of WTC7 from the fall of the north face exterior roof line. This is very clearly stated in the NIST report . They didn't do it with a close up on a window that became skyblue to prove the interior collapsed first.
F'ing ridiculous. Get real
They admit the global collapse was in free fall in stage 2.
SO they did not have an opinion on his paper. They were pressured to make him leave.
"There were two authors from BYU listed on that paper, Dr. Farrer (as second author) and Daniel Farnsworth. Their affiliation with the BYU Department of Physics and Astronomy was listed in the paper, with the approval of BYU".
Thats why it was peer reviewed at BYU before the goons you protect pressured BYU to make him leave.
@Merlin5by5 yeah, yeah, yeah... blah, blah blah.... The paper was also peer reviewed in "The Environmentalist" you can try to smear them as much as you want, and say that all 9 international scientists who worked on this for 18 months did it as a scam for money, but the fact remains the same: the paper has been per reviewed multiple times, and you can't handle that fact.
Now, I wasted enough time on your bullshit and your made up arguments.
@Merlin5by5 The paper has been peer reviewed a multiple times. Get over it.
The WTC dust is filled with explosiv residue.
WTC7 fell at free fall speed (admitted by NIST, and impossible unless explosivs were used)
It collapsed symetrically into is own footprint. (impossible with asymetrical damage)
WTC7 was controlled demolished, thus 9-11 was an inside job. You know it, I know it, and I'm fed up with this bullshit, so I'll just keep reposting this comment if you keep trolling.
@Merlin5by5 The paper has been peer reviewed a MULTIPLE times. Get over it.
The WTC dust is filled with explosiv residue.
WTC7 fell at free fall speed (admitted by NIST, and impossible unless EXPLOSIVS were used)
It collapsed symetrically into is own footprint. (impossible with asymetrical damage)
WTC7 was controlled demolished, thus 9-11 was an inside job. You know it, I know it, and I'm fed up with this bullshit, so I'll just keep reposting this comment if you keep trolling.
@Merlin5by5 What part of "peer reviewed MULTIPLE times" don't you understand?
By the Chair of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at BYU, by The Environmentalist, as well as Bentham.
if it's so easy to get stuff published by Bentham, why don't you shills publish something in a Bentham journal debunking the paper? From what you are saying, Bentham should be happy to take your nonsense for dollars.
For the time being, NOBODY has debunked it in a peer reviewed paper.
@Merlin5by5 "No physics and astronomy departement at BYU"? FAIL. Google it . Another crap assessment on your behalf. Most of your comments are filled with bullshit like this. I'm seriously fed up with discussing with someone who comes with fals claims all the time. This is a waste of time. Show me one peer reviewed paper who debunks the thermitic material paper, then we can talk. For the time being you have NOTHING, just smears, name calling in factual incorrect remarks. Good bye low life shill
@Merlin5by5 My God! you are sinking to deeper depths!
Again, do you even know what "peer reviewed" means??
I said: Give me a pear reviewd paper. Not this crap posted on some unknown website by some unknown nobody. And who the fuck is this "T. Mark Hightower" anyways??
As to your ridiculous claim the of the Physics and astronomy department, it was the 2008 Ryan-Gourley-Jones paper that was peer rewied by the chair of that departement.
@Merlin5by5 your link is as ridiculous and unscientific as you are. There are no peer reviewed journals listed there. And your "T.Mark Hightower" is a nobody who has only written ridiculous articles about 9-11 if you do a quick google search.
Get a fucking life, shill. You are pathetic and I pitty you. I've wasted enough time demonstrating that everything you say is fals, and is as fake as your terrorist attack.
9-11 was an inside job. Get over it and stop being a low life shill.
@Merlin5by5 If you had ANY geopolitical notion, you'd know that it was the CIA that trained, armed and funded "AL-CIA-DA" in Afghanistan. Its documented that the CIA used Alqaeda in bosnia, and that there is enough evidence to say that CIA has kept contact with al qaeda and used them as they wanted. I'm not going to get into this level of discussion with you, because you've proven to be ridiculous in all you other posts. I've had it with morons like yourself. good bye.
@Merlin5by5 OBL has a long history of working with the americans. We know he was funded by the CIA and that it was the CIA that created the name Al Qaeda ("the base") It was a data base of mujahadeens the CIA could use in different conflicts. ("BBC "power of nightmares")
FBI whistleblower Sybel Edmonds has documented the americans worked with him up until 9-11. "Le Monde" journalist Richard Labevière wrote in july 2001 that OBL was in an american hospital in Dubai and visited by a CIA agent.
Sybel Edmonds was hired, as a contractor, to work as an interpreter in the translations unit of the FBI on September 20, 2001. She was suspended by December, and fired in March 2002.
Wow, less than 3 months to learn all the secret programs of the US and the NWO, while being just a contractor for the people Translations unit of the FBI.
Betcha you didn't look up the dates there either, Huh?
VERY Impressive, in an incredibly stupid kinda way.
@Merlin5by5 Yes, she had access to doumentation, and was the whistblower of all that she saw. I never said she learned all the secret programs of the US and the NWO, thats just some bullshit you spray because you have no arguments.
Anyways, I'm fed up with talking to you . All I do, is to correct every lie you say, so you jump on some other lie, that I correct, etc
You are a ridiculous man. You have no honour and your shill activity is pathetic.
watch war by deception and 911 missing links and fabled enemies for the full picture in 9-11 anyone can see this was mossad
bulletproof2353 1 day ago
the jews did 9-11 everyone knows it it was a mossad .cia opperation
bulletproof2353 1 day ago
The interviewer didn't tell Jowenko that WTC 7 had major fires raging in it (according to FDNY), that in footage with sound there is no sign of detonation charges, or that the collapse was expected by FDNY & other experts on the scene. He didn’t tell him there was no trace of detonation charges in the seismic record. So he didn’t have all the info that would have been useful to make a judgment. And if you think Jowenko is credible, note that he says WTC 1 & 2 were NOT demolitions.
PoetryHound 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There appears to be NO END to the murders first perpetrated by GW Bush and Larry Silverstein on 11 September 2001; continuing through the present. A very good and hard working man such as Danny Jowenko; ruthlessly authorized to be murdered by Soetoro-Obama. It is Obama who claimed to have killed Osama-bin Laden in May 2011; the man actually having died in 2002. Obama is an ILLEGAL ALIEN, having never been naturalized. He is also a MURDERER bent on living off of the PEOPLE; BUSH=OBAMA=PLAGUE
cliffordanthonypaiva 6 days ago
All demo experts are working at WalMart now, since they discovered that merely setting a building on fire will make it collapse perfectly into its own footprint.
troglodyte2084 6 days ago
I blew up this tower, he is right. it takes experts to do this. COME FIND ME FUCKERS
Ushersgaymom3 1 month ago
he died.. r.i.p.
VideoVerifying 1 month ago
what a coincidence...this guy died in a ''car accident'' in the same time frame
HamayunShah 1 month ago
This part of the Jowenko interview is always taken out of context and misrepresents what he said and thought. You need to watch the whole thing from start to finish to fully understand why this is the case, however.
UK31337 2 months ago
Watch /watch?v=eK2rVhOukqM explains how they planned 911
Dantedijon 3 months ago
love his reaction "the same day!"
cologist 3 months ago
RIP
LettersOfCentinel76 3 months ago
@LettersOfCentinel76 Murdered.
Prancer1231 2 months ago
@Prancer1231 Well his death certainly is suspicious, but I'll leave it at that. "Murdered" is the first thing that popped into my mind but then again, accidents do happen.
And 9/11 was NOT an inside job. 9/11 was a Mossad operation, plain and simple.
LettersOfCentinel76 2 months ago
@LettersOfCentinel76 Since Jowenko states that a controlled demolition of WTC 1 & 2 would have been impossible, and if he had known the scope of the WTC7 fires and seen the video that included the earlier penthouse collapse, he would have come to the same conclusion concerning B7, who would you suspect?
lijebaley01 2 months ago
@lijebaley01 9/11 was done by the Israeli Mossad. Exactly how they orchestrated it is of no major relevance to me. I am aware that Jowenko believed that WTC 1 and 2 were taken down by planes, but he was adamant that WTC7 was taken down by controlled demolition.
On 9/11 five Mossad agents set up a video camera and recorded the attacks. After the second plane hit they celebrated. They were arrested and secretly deported to Israel.
LettersOfCentinel76 2 months ago
@LettersOfCentinel76 Sorry, we see why he formed his opinion. He was told there were hardly no fires... he was told the collapse took 7 seconds, when the visible collapse started 7 seconds earlier. Had he know the scope of the fires, and the earlier interier collapse, he would have emphatically denied a controlled demolition was possible. You will never agree about it, and I don't give a crap what you believe. The proof of lies is right there for everyone to see.
lijebaley01 2 months ago
@lijebaley01 clearly you lack a basic understanding of physics, and the path of least resistance. for that building to have collapsed into its own foot print without even touching any of the buildings around it, every single core column would have to have been severed almost simultaneously, within milliseconds of each other in order to do that. any delay in one of the columns would have made it tilt over to the side.
Shad0wSt0rm360 3 weeks ago
@lijebaley01 by your logic, we should just set every building on fire that's scheduled to be demolished, instead of spending hundreds of man hours and tens of thousands of dollars, taking a team of experts to bring down a building using explosives. what you're saying is absolutely nonsensical
Shad0wSt0rm360 3 weeks ago
@lijebaley01 Quote:
"The proof of lies is right there for everyone to see."
Indeed it is.
Jowenko looked at the drawings, and it couldn't have been done by fire, that's what he said on the phone against Jeffrey Hill.
That's what he told me on the phone.
I don't think he was murdered, but he just talked from his experience as a guy who knows what it takes to implode a building.
Of course WTC7 was imploded on purpose by the use of CD, question is by whom, how and why? Who had access?
Sandberg1972 4 hours ago
@lijebaley01 On Israeli TV they were later interviewed. They said that they were posing as art students but were really Mossad agents sent to America to document 9/11.
LettersOfCentinel76 2 months ago
@lijebaley01 No suspects. Control Demolition Inc. (CDI), a US Government classified contract implosion company (the best in the world) implements all US implosion work (see CDI-Government). Authorization for demolition of WTC-1, 2 7 and 6 was issued by GW Bush, in conjuction with Larry Silverstein (owner of WTC Lease) and his 26 July 2001 terrorist insurance. Go to Clifford Anthony Paiva FACEBOOK under PHOTOS Government Murder and Corruption. Bin Laden died 2002.
cliffordanthonypaiva 1 week ago
funny how the smart people are left out of the official story! real experts know this was an inside job, those paid off knows it too but could not say it
sh9683 4 months ago
Inside job, no fucking doubt!
bongojim420 4 months ago 9
@bongojim420 Inside AND outside (Israel).
Prancer1231 2 months ago
I am going to shove REAL ENGINEERING up your ass till you scream like a bitch, little kooktard.
Be Afraid, very afraid.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 go back to school, learn som basic physics, then we can talk.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
Basic Physics is a pre-requisite for college. Odd you didn't know that.
It's on the SAT and ACT tests. Didn't you ever take them?
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Merlin5by5 I said : go back to school, learn som basic physics, then we can talk.
The911watch 4 months ago
WTC7 fell SYMETRICALLY in FREE FALL SPEED into its own FOOTPRINT. EXPLOSIONS were heard/seen/documented, and EXPLOSIV RESIDUE has been found in WTC dust.
A 5 year old can see this was a controlled demolition, 1600 architects and engineers can see this was a controlled demolition and any C.D expert Dany Jowenko saw this was a controlled demo.
If you don't see that, you are either:
- in denial
- dumber than a second coat of paint
- a paid shill.
I suspect you are all three.
The911watch 4 months ago 3
You forgot to mention whether or not Jawenko knew B7 was on fire. See, if had known, he would have said a CD would have been impossible for the same reason he said a CD of WTC1&2 were impossible.
lijebaley01 4 months ago
@lijebaley01 One year after this interview, he had read the official NIST explanation and still reaffirmed his conclusions in a phone interview with blogger Jeff Hill. When asked if he stuck by his assertion that Building 7 was brought down with explosives, Jowenko replied with one word: "Absolutely." He went on to refute NIST's theory of a fire-induced collapse, stating that "I've looked at the drawings, at the construction, and it couldn't have been done by fire."
The911watch 4 months ago
And Somehow from your statement the conclusion can be made that he understood the scope of the damage? His testimony proves otherwise.
lijebaley01 4 months ago
@lijebaley01 No, his testimony says that he had read and understood the NIST report and still believed it was a controlled demolition, not fire.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
A phone conversation with a delusional blogger is hardly testimony, it's called
hearsay. The blogger heard him say, according to the blogger. It's not admissable
in any court, world wide. Press charges, or shut up.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@The911watch I just listened to the phone interview again, and nowhere does he say he read and understood the NIST report. According to NIST the building would have fallen independent of any fires. All that was needed was the failure of column 79. Again, he said the CD of 1 and 2 were impossible and among his reasons is the fires would have destroyed the ignitors. If he had known the scope of the fires he would have said the same of building 7.
lijebaley01 4 months ago
@lijebaley01 bullshit, you're a liar and a paid shill.. are you telling people here about your campfire science experiments too?
ThisPageStaysREAL 3 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL You can not find one instance where I have lied. Wanna know why? It's because I do not lie. I challenge you to find one lie from me.
lijebaley01 3 months ago
@lijebaley01 no problem, I say you are lying about having reproduced the holes in the iron that Nist attributed to water, gypsum and fire, they never proved this with experiment, yet..you claimed it was simple and that you had done so in a campfire of all places. I point to a documented video which tries to validate the Nist claim, but cannot. Yet you say you have done it. Id offer a complete retraction and genuine apology if you in fact recorded and proved your claim to be the truth.
ThisPageStaysREAL 3 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL No, she it for brains... My experiment showed accelerated oxidation over a very short time, under conditions much less severe than that of ground zero. It is easily verified. I am going to try it again at room temperature to see if it is proven under conditions even a person of your means and ingenuity can repeat.
That turned out to be a lie by you, so try again.
lijebaley01 3 months ago
@lijebaley01 No sorry it doesn't work that way. I had asked you a direct question after you made the statement that the holes in the steel, (referred to as swiss cheese) by Nist, were easily reproducable. I then asked you 2 additional times if you were sure, the second time i even added "you're not lying right?" because i have already seen an attempted reproduction with conditions far more extreme than 9/11 fail to produce that effect. So you saying it does, is nonsense w/o video documentation.
ThisPageStaysREAL 3 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL No, moron, I never said anything beyond stating you can get accelerated oxidation from the materials present. I don't doubt for one second that the steel they tested showed accelerated oxidation when they were done. Now you seem to have devine knowledge of the conditions that created the questionable steel. Guess what idiot. It wasn't thermite that did it.
lijebaley01 3 months ago
@lijebaley01 See.. just like every other clown on i come across, as soon as you're out of valid points, or get caught in your own bullshit you begin this fucking name calling. As if we were face to face i wouldnt slap the shit outta you. Moron, Idiot, etc. You used the term swiss cheese, refers to holes in the god damn steel. and NIST couldnt reproduce what they stated.. You said you pulled it off using a campfire, and i called bullshit.If you cant provide proof, just say so. be a man sweetheart
ThisPageStaysREAL 3 months ago
@ThisMoronStaysIgnorant You don't read too well do you? You lack the intelligence to address anything I have said. You called me a liar, now prove something that I said to be a lie. I found accelerated oxidation in my experiment. Do you even understand what that means?
lijebaley01 2 months ago
@lijebaley01 yawn... i know what it doesn't mean, it doesnt mean anything close to twisted steel with fat holes in it described as swiss cheese by observers. Which is what you hinted you were able to achieve in a campfire. So are you gonna record your lil' demo and upload it or just dance around the question from time to time?
ThisPageStaysREAL 2 months ago
@ThisPageStaysREAL You made an accusation, and now accept that you interpreted it correctly, and its veracity. You should apologize now.
lijebaley01 2 months ago
Mr. "LOL" here is a common Zionist hasbara troll who lies for False Flag mass murderers of Americans, but what is especially disgusting is that he does it posing as an American veteran.
onefodderunit 4 months ago
@onefodderunit
Frankly, Herr Dumpkoff, what a fat old moron who imitates Sargeant Schultz,
and screams about Zionists and zionism is still on the earth for is beyond me.
Like a horse, you should be put out of your misery. US Veterans, like the
USS Liberty veterans, have always despised people like you.
I feel quite at home among them.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5
That's right, USS LIBERTY was another Zionist False Flag mass murder, same as September 11
Regarding your 'loyalty'; Four unarmed American civilians have been shot in the face in four separate incidences by IDF Jews since a Russian immigrant IDF Jew murdered Rachel Corrie in 2003.
One of the Americans was murdered with three shots to the face from point blank after being gunned down in the back.
Do you agree that IDF Jews are sadistic terrorists whom the USofA needs to strike down?
onefodderunit 4 months ago
@onefodderunit
NOPE, I mostly think I wish you were handed over to Jews who were sadistic
and terrified you. Frankly, I think anyone bigger than a six year old girl
terrifies you, and you need to be put down like a lame nag.
I don't remember IDF Jews worrying about trashy Morons on the Internet.
They seem to be much smarter than you.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@onefodderunit
"The USS Liberty Memorial web site abhors the racist and extreme positions taken by anti-Semitic, Anti-Zionist, Holocaust denial, conspiracy theorist and other such groups which often seek to identify with us and to usurp our story as their own. "
I think they are talking about you, Sonny Jim.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5
What "Holocaust"? Eisenhower, Churchill, and de Gualle each wrote memoirs about the second world war totaling over 7000 pages published as late as 1959. They never once mention a '6 million' victimized Jews, a 'genocide' of Jews, or a 'gas chamber'.
The first time gas chambers were mentioned in a film about WWII wasn't until 1972. The word 'holocaust' wasn't used in films until the late 1970s
You can't post a single undeniable gassing of anyone.
IDF need to be punished, Yes or No?
onefodderunit 4 months ago
@onefodderunit
on page 223 of “Dear General: Eisenhower’s Wartime Letters to Marshall,”
Eisenhower wrote: "The visual evidence and the verbal testimony of starvation, cruelty and bestiality were so overpowering as to leave me a bit sick. In one room, where they [there] were piled up twenty or thirty naked men, killed by starvation, George Patton would not even enter. He said that he would get sick if he did so."
Google it, because the NEXT sentence is WONDERFUL.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@onefodderunit
EISENHOWER wrote "I made the visit [to Gotha] deliberately, in order to be in a position to give first-hand evidence of these things if ever, in the future, there develops a tendency to charge these allegations merely to “propaganda.”
page 223 of “Dear General: Eisenhower’s Wartime Letters to Marshall,”
I believe Gen. Eisenhower is referring to you there, little Nazi Boy.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@onefodderunit
In 1932, Churchill was in Munich when Hitler came to power, researching the book
he wrote on the First Duke of Marlborough. Hitler wanted to meet him, and Churchill
wrote back "What is the sense of being against a man simply because of his birth?"
Hitler rejected any further meetings. In April 1933, he wrote "There is a danger of
the ODIUS conditions in Germany, where persecution and Pogroms against the
Jews are rife, being extended into new areas, like Poland and Sudetentland"
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@onefodderunit
NOT TO BAD there, Sonny Boy, you manage to list two leaders who led the
fight against Jewish and Zionist wild men from BEFORE the Nazi experiment.
And I sure can post MANY instances of Nazi Gassing of victims, including
PILES of Zyklon-B Cans, and a delivery schedule that would have allowed
the Nazis to gas the camps 15 times a day, for four years, delivered in
just two years. The National Holocaust museum has about 50 TONS of
evidence. Take it up with them.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@The911watch
.
TEN YEARS of ineffectual pissing into the wind for 9/11 Twoofers.
You have been getting embarassed by the US establishment
for TEN YEARS. LOL, you can't even present a coherent
argument anymore, and you will claim any two or three sides
of ANY Issue just to preserve your Idiot's fantasy.
I don't think George Bush has a thing to worry about, LOL.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
'Tuesday Morning in September'. Available on DVD. Runtime 130 minutes.
Pure, unfiltered, authentic, and being released in such a way to keep its integrity.
Project is not affiliated and or connected to, working for any organization,
putting forth propaganda and or slant perspectives of the events on 9/11.
It is the most complete chronicle in real time of the wtc attacks.
tusmorninginsept 4 months ago
Ask FDNY Chiefs Fellini and Hayden about WT7. They were there and know how badly damaged the bldg was.
The fact is that 7 was built with a pretty tricky foundation plan.
The fact is that the lower floors on the Vesey side were ripped out, leaving 47 floors poorly supported.
The fact is that fires were roaring in 7.
The fact is that many FDNY Engineers and Chiefs knew it would fall, because there was no way to fight the fires...and it was already OUT OF PLUMB!
The fact is...911 CT is BS!
LindaStevensBZ 4 months ago
Want further proof from Steven Jones OWN report?
Here is the Address on the Thermitic report for S&J SCIENTIFIC.
S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT, 84606, USA; Tel: 801-735-5885
Go ahead, call the 411 for Provo, and ask for the address.
It's never been there. Call the Phone, and Steven Jones will
tell you it's his voicemail. What happened to the Lab?
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE OF THE WTC TOWERS
civil. northwestern. e du/ people/ bazant/ PDFs/ Papers/ 466. p df
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
/watch?v=RhgmRm3aiaY
HomerbearReloaded 5 months ago
LMAO, Danny Jowenko claimed WTC 1 and WTC 2 were NOT controlled demolition, but his first glance at WTC 7's limited clip, and NO PRIOR knowledge that the building had BURNED for 8 hours is ignored by 9/11 Truthers. That's why he is surprised that the demolition is done in one day.
He asks THREE times, because He knows that's impossible.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
Comment removed
commando7144 5 months ago
What the video doesn't show is Danny explaining how he knew nothing about WTC7 before the interview, that Danny only saw that limited (cut!) clip of WTC7 from one angle with no other information, Danny stating that he didn't know how it collapsed (how could he know?) but that he has not enough info to draw any conclusion.
He sees only a tiny clip and based on that he says it looks like a CD job. Thats it. It sickens me to see how Truthers try to make their case twisting a dead man's words.
WindmillStalker 5 months ago
RIP Danny
ShaunWhiteismyGinger 5 months ago 5
They just kill these people, the arrogance, all these witnesses etc killed jeesh!
XanArt21 6 months ago
@XanArt21 Yes, they killed Jennings too.
Prancer1231 5 months ago
closing your mind to the possibility that maybe this WAS an inside job is pure ignorance. Don't just believe what the media tell you! Make you're own opinion about what happend.
but what's certain is that too many innocent people died, while the nation helplessly watched. RIP to all those who died on 9/11 <3
ImCool415 6 months ago
The US government with ALL the experts in ALL fields of studies cannot fucking explain why the building collapsed in free-fall manner? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ....You gotta be the most retarded douche to buy the official story.
KrazeDiamond 6 months ago
911 WAS A MUTHAFUCKIN INSIDE JO B.
FUCK YOU!
glassandroid 6 months ago
1. Free fall
2. No resistance
3. Typical CLEAR demo kink clearly seen in the middle of the building
4.Demo squibs can be seen CLEARLY in one of the angles of the collapse
5. Silverstein, owner of all 3 buildings negotiates the insurance on them 3 weeks prior to include "terrorist attacks", and made him billions.
6. Oh and of course he said pull it like a fucking idiot. Damn evil elite sociopaths can't even keep their heads straight on in following interviews, and over the years.
INSIDE JOB
jedichris8 6 months ago
Comment removed
jedichris8 6 months ago
But the official report agrees the columns went. So as this dude didn't hear the bangs nor did anyone see any cords or explosives, it is meaningless as contradictory evidence.
Besides how come none of you WTC7 crazies can answer the key question? If it shouldn't have come down but had explosives in it, why did so many firefighters and police see it creaking and bulging and say beforehand it would come down? Is that coincidence?
OneBigRetard 6 months ago
@OneBigRetard
Hey, dipshit. NICE TRY
It is NOT documented that they "saw it creaking and bulging". Non one has ever stated that on the clips at the scene or eluded to that. The ONLY thing that's documented is them saying "it's coming down", "that buildings gonna be coming down soon". The building would come down with SOME resistance at the very least. It should topple to the sides and around a little, at the very least. But no, people want to be brain dead, or paid shills and say what you say.
jedichris8 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jedichris8
So it was a coincidence that they thought it was going to collapse and then it did. That's what you are saying??
As for creaking, leaning and a bulge.
/watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8
sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/accountsofwtc7damage
sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofwtc7fires
sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofthewithdrawalfromwtc
Plenty there to disprove your 'The ONLY thing' bullshit.
"It should topple to the sides" Why oh engineering expert?
OneBigRetard 6 months ago
@OneBigRetard Ok, so we're all supposed to believe your dumb ass (with the handle"OneBigRetard") and ignore one of the top demolitions experts in Europe... yeah, good idea...
enunna 6 months ago
@enunna
Truther 101. Ignore the valid question I asked and move on to personal insults.
Are you really comfortable living like that? An ad hom and an appeal to authority and no attempt to actually find your own truth.
I repeat " If it shouldn't have come down but had explosives in it, why did so many firefighters and police see it creaking and bulging and say beforehand it would come down? Is that coincidence?"
Just another insult in response I guess?
OneBigRetard 6 months ago
que descanse en paz......
99cacahuate 6 months ago
Geht mal auf mosaik 9/11 und Danny Jowenko. Eine weitere Manipulation.
SoWirdGelogen 7 months ago
Car accident? how many more witnesses to the truth bumped off?
MarkB1ngham 7 months ago
@MarkB1ngham
Well, Jowenko wasn't really a key WITNESS. Yet he's an expert which view on the WTC 7 "collapse" is crucial to the world's oppinion on 9/11 - which means "just as dangerous to them as witnesses such as Jennings etc." So of course they had to kill him.
Thetan1974 7 months ago 2
i believe that danny was killed by gummen ...to cover up his study of 911
MrThor04 7 months ago
RIP Danny !
fapsqpz 7 months ago
Zieke geesten zouden ook niet auto moeten rijden.
koertje 7 months ago
thanks Danny, i will pledge my efforts to making sure you are not forgotten
thisisyourwakeup 7 months ago 6
I live in san francisco whare a new portion of the bay bridge is being built. yesterday as i was driving over the bridge i noticed they were using steel beams to build the bridge. at some time in the future there will have to be a car fire on that bridge that would make the entire bridge blow up right? i mean we learned this is scientific fact after 9/11!! i cant believe the designer of the bridge didnt take that into consideration.
frogger1017 7 months ago
May this gentleman rest in peace.
ZionistsRunTheGov 7 months ago
and now he's dead, SURPRISE! people are so stupid, they just watch 'news' on tv and belive the tales. thats all just a huge version of a bad written hollywood script
MrsSmillas 7 months ago 3
Danny rest in peace!
mlohr1 7 months ago 3
Jammer, erg slecht. RIP.
spiccybaby 7 months ago
R.I.P
LynchByInch 7 months ago
this poor man.. all he was trying to do was tell the people the truth. It was obviously blown up and it didn't burn down. This is such a crazy world and the only way people will stop speaking the truth is when their lives are in danger, because, sadly, there are.
justeroniehh 7 months ago 4
another one we lost at the wrong time
HongPong 7 months ago 2
:(
Birgeyful 7 months ago
Comment removed
annarca 7 months ago
Dutch demolition expert Danny Jowenko was killed a car accident Saturday in the Netherlands. He was reportedly driving from church when he collided head-on with a tree. There was also a dog in the car who survived.
Seigu007 7 months ago 2
Danny Jowenko, the demolition expert in this clip, just got killed in a car accident in the Netherlands.
decoysbyschmidt 7 months ago 31
@decoysbyschmidt
MOTHER OF GOD
and the 9/11 key witnesses experts who speak out keep dying. This could be a coincidence of course, but at this point I doubt it. I'm gonna look into it..
jedichris8 6 months ago 2
@decoysbyschmidt
Seriously????
XanArt21 6 months ago
@decoysbyschmidt How typical heh? That's one of the favorite way of TPTB to eliminate whistleblowers. Fortunely we have his honest statement on tape and everyone should watch it to honor his death.
rodhf 5 months ago
@rodhf
OH YEAH, the CIA, the NWO, the Aliens, and Nibiru all demanded Danny Jowenko
die in a car crash. I remember getting that memo. klaatu barada nikto!
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 Hey, I think "Jersey Shores" is back on. you should go watch that instead of comenting nonsens here.
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
Compared to you, the "Jersey Shores" crew are MENSA geniuses.
Because Assassinating Danny Jowenko TEN years after the fact makes about
as much sense as you graduating high school. It's factually impossible.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 what the fuck are you talking about? When did I say he was assasinated?
No wonder the masses still believe in the official story and get suckered into nonsensical wars, manipulated by the media, when people are as dumb as you.
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
Hey, I am happy to be one of the masses of people that ignore you.
No one suckers me into necessary wars. It's the ignorant assholes who think
they can avoid war and death by terrorist that I worry about. They usually end
up sitting at home and backbiting like immature bitches.
I am talking about YOU, there, Sonny Boy.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 Please explain why we invaded Iraq, and what was the connection between Iraq and 9-11? Could it be that was just a bunch of lies served to the gullible, dumb masses who believes whatever their TV tells them (like you) ?
Or what about Afghanistan? why are we attacking Taliban when it was supposedly Al qaeda (all Saudies) that attacked us. Could that also be some bullshit they told you because they had planned attacking afghanistan long before 9-11?
You are one gullible SOB
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
We invaded IRAQ because that nation ignored 19 different UN sanctions against
them, had invaded Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, and had sponsored two assassination
attempts against two former american presidents, Bush and Clinton.
It's ODD you don't remember that, that was the majority of Bush's explanation.
Nobody here is a dumb mass, crack whore, the US is the MOST sophisticated
nation on earth, and you are just more white trash on the internet.
Can you swallow my cum now, Bitch?
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 Wow, I've been reading your comments, and you seriously have some psycological problems:
- "Can you swallow my cum now, Bitch?"???
You sound like a fucked up marine who've been induced to to much pschycological trauma. Get your head checked.
Start listening to the over 1600 Architects and engineers, who have scientific evidence 9-11 was an inside job. You'll see your war time psychological trauma is a result of your country's fals flag attack on its own people.
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
NOPE, I am just an engineer who can recognize FAILURE when I see it.
I started listening to the 150,000 Civil Engineers at the ASCE LONG before
College failure conspiracy nutjobs started joining AE911 Twoof. After all
it's just a paper sign up sheet, it's not like you morons have to present a
degree, or professional engineering experience, LOL. THEN you can
join the TEN YEARS of your personal failure to prove a conspiracy on or
about 9/11. Then, I think, you can just fade away.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 judging by your language and comments, I seriously doubt you are an ingeneer.
Lets see if you are (i suppose you can answer these simple questions if you are an ingeneer)
- How could WTC7 have fallen in free fall speed (Admitted by NIST) without explosivs?
- Why is there thermitic material (explosiv residue) in all WTC dust samples?
- What are the chances for all the steal beams to snap at the same time all over the building, so the building could collapse so symetrically ?
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
1. WTC 7 didn't fall at free fall speed for any time. The outer curtain wall of the
building fell 2.3 seconds out of 7, after being pulled down by the INTERNAL
structure that fell into the building 8 seconds before the external walls fell.
WTC 6 and WTC 5 ALSO suffered internal collapses.
2. There WAS NO thermitic residue. Steven Jones fabricated a PHONY
report with a PHONY LAB. Don't trust me, Call the phone number of
S&J Labs in Provo Utah.
3. 100 %, Duhhhh
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 yeah, your not much an engineer:
1. WTC fell at free fall speed for 2.5 second. NIST show this very clearly in their graph. They analysed the collapse in 3 stages:
1) the initiation (not free fall)
2) the collapse (2.5 sec of freefall)
3) the ground impact (fall slows down)
Please read the NIST report before comenting nonsens. Freefall is impossible unless something (explosivs) takes away the supporting structure.
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
The NIST chart of WTC 7s Gravitational fall, is at NCSTAR 1A, page 46, Figure 3-15,
charted TWO years prior to DavidRChandler, it patiently explains that the building was falling for EIGHT seconds
before DavidRChandler even begins his attempt at timing the Northwest corner with PHYSICS Toolkit, a high school phsyics tool published by an educational arm of NIST, LOL.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@The911watch
It seems the simplest thing, but wannabe Twoofer engineers JUST DON'T Get it.
The structure fails BEFORE Movement begins, otherwise, it would NOT move.
The Idea that explosions ran down the building, or nano thermite melted steel,
while the collapse was in process, is just a special kind of stupid.
NYC and PANY used NASA AVIRIS systems to track temps and guide the
firefighters after 9/11, so we ONLY have 3 different sources of NO thermitic
material. Giant, proposterous, FAILURE.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@The911watch
I mean Fella, Engineers on Youtube laughed DavidRChandler off youtube in
the first two weeks after he proposed that WTC 7 bullshit. The NIST chart
showing 2.3 seconds of fall was done nearly two years before.
STEVEN Jones hasn't had his report reproduced by ANY Lab, and even refuses
to share his "Samples", and the NYC dust standard doesn't have red / gray chips.
BY THE WAY, symmetrical debris piles are caused by ANY vertical fall.
Drop some water on some paper, try it. DUH
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 "Engineers on Youtbube"?? Is that an academy ? Ridiculous.
It was David Chandler that made NIST revide their graph, that they corrected in the final report. They still admit to freefall. Guess you bumbed out on that one.
Steven Jones and all the other scientists got one of their sample from Jeanett Mckinley. Several other scientists have gotten their sample from her and found the same thing. YOU can get one if you want.
Fake, strawman argument.
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
On DavidRChandler's own video, you can SEE the East Penthouse collapse into
the Building 8 seconds before David Begins counting, and the NCSTAR 1-9
release candidate, released in 2005, has the same chart. Find out for yourself
when David published his argument. Steven Jones is the ONLY 9/11 dust
sample that even has red / gray chips. The NYC Dust standard, done by
real scientists, sure doesn't have them.
inspectapedia. com/ WTC/ WTCdust. htm
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 (continued from last comment) You still haven't explained why NIST admits to freefall ACCELERATION on stage 2 of the collapse on graph 3-15 of their final report, and how on earth is that even possible without the use of explosivs?
The911watch 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 BTW you stink "shill" miles away. You spend day and night trying to cover up 9-11 truth, and your doing a crap job out of it.
Grow a conscious, and stop being a dick.
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
HEY, by the way, Did I mention that TWO scientific editors REJECTED and Resigned over Open Bentham publishing, for $800, in EGYPT, at MIDNIGHT, the Steven Jones Report?
I am going to go out on a LIMB here, and call that a BAD peer review, LOL.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 Hey do you know that paper has been peer riewed multiple times? not only by Bentham but also by "the Environmentalist" as well as the by the Chair of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at BYU. So get real.
As to the samples, there are num,erous samples and its not only steven jones. Mark Basil got a sample from Jeanett mckinley and one from a 9-11 museum. Again. get yourself a sample and look for yourself.
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch (continued from last comment 2) This is what NIST say in their final about the WTC7 collapse:
"in stage 2, the northface descended at gravitational acceleration as the buckled columns provided neglible support to the upper portion of the north face. This free fall continued for 32 m"
So they DO admit to free fall, as well as an accelerated collapse. Mind explaining how on earth that is possible, when collapsing through the path of most resistance, unless explosivs were used ???
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
LMAO, the Department of Physics at BYU all signed a letter disavowing Dr. Jones.
That's why they gave him the Bum's Rush out the door, and gave him the fool's
choice of Retirement or Dismissal. There are THREE NYC repositories of WTC
DUST samples, Dumbshit. NYU, Rutgers, and the National Institues of Health.
They all agree, and so do 13 Major academic studies, that there are NO red / gray
chips, and I already pointed out to you that the NYC Inspector standards don't
have it.
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 What ? governement organisation refute nano thermate? How bizarre. I have seen no link, no article or proof of what you are saying. What I have seen are different scientists (from Jones to Harrit, to Mark Basil) who have all seen the same thing, providing pictures, documentation, as well as graphs.
You still haven't explained how WTC7could have fallen in free fall speed without explosivs.
You are a fucking SHILL. I've seen you on many vids, trying to debunk 9-11 truth.
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
LMAO, it's NOT just the government organizations. The US Science establishment roundly rejects Controlled Demolition, and Nano thermite is STILL manufactured in tiny quantitities by a PROTOTYPE lab setup at the US Navy's Powder explosive lab at Indian Head, SC. HERE is proof of that.
WTC, NANO THERMITE, 2002 THERMITE PRODUCTION PROCESS, LIMITS ON P45
ammtiac. alionscience. co m /pdf/ AMPQ6_1ART06. p df
It would take 500 years to make ONE TON of nano thermite. Big Fail, LOL
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@The911watch
OH, and I sure did reject and refute your stupid claim about WTC 7.
The building's OUTER wall fell 8 seconds after the East Penthouse went into
the building. SO, Dumbshit, the internal collapse PULLED the support away
from the EXTERNAL curtain wall, which is just bolted to the frame.
That was obvious from DavidRChandler's own video, But NIST actually
proved it with a closeup of the windows behind David's perimeter wall.
They went SKY BLUE well before the collapse. NEXT...
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 Hey SHILL, I've posted this before, but you seem to ignore it. This is from the NIST final report of the WTC7 collapse:
"in stage 2, the northface descended at gravitational acceleration as the buckled columns provided neglible support to the upper portion of the north face. This free fall continued for 32 m"
NIST admits to free fall acceleration. OK?
Now explain how a building can collapse in accelerated free fall through the path of most resistance without explosivs?
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
Well yeah, dumbshit. NIST knows the difference between the NORTH FACE
and the columns that actually support the building. Where's the conflict?
FIND "The path of least / most resistance" in any physics book, Dumbass.
Gravity falls down, and if I dropped a CAR on top of you, that car would NOT
tip toe around you to find the path of least resistance. It would fall straight
down, accelerating right thru your body. Need the math?
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 OMG are you serious??! that is one of the dumbest things I've heard today.
The floors of the building (path of most resistance) would SLOW DOWN the fall (not ACCELERATE the FREEFALL)
Are you seriously that demented not to understand that ?
The only thing that would cause an accelerated freefall is the use of explosivs.
You just proved you have NO cred. Now stop your disgusting SHILL activity
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
No, actually, the floors of the building would NOT slow down the fall.
Their resistance would be overcome in miliseconds, they were just bolted on.
The Bolts would shear off like any crystaline structure, steel is a crystal.
Gravity is all you need for the WTC collapses. You DO REALIZE that half of an
explosion's energy is directed UPWARDS, don't you? Besides, I thought you
were a Nano thermite Monkey boy?
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
What??? the floors wouldn't slow down the collapse? so basically 47 floors provides as much resistance as thin air? you are so full of bullshit.
Funny how you refuted the freefall some comments ago, but now that I provided the NIST quote admiting its frefall, its suddenly ok for a building to crush itself through 47 stories as fast as through thin air.
You are ridiculous.
I've googled your profile Merlin5by5. You are a fucking shill and you disgust me.
The911watch 5 months ago
@The911watch
Geez, Boy, how friggin Dumb ARE you? Any building structure is defeated
BEFORE movement / collapse begins. IF the structure was still there, it
would NOT collapse. The NIST free fall statement refers to the NORTH FACE,
which is exactly what I told you, the facade of the building. READ your
own quote dumbass. ONLY a Twoofer idiot would not read his own quote.
NOT to mention the complete inability to read an engineering report.
NIST reports are NOT kryptonite, though they might burn
Merlin5by5 5 months ago
@Merlin5by5 HAHAHA! Thanks for that comment. That just made my day! RIDICULOUS!!
You are grasping at straws, and doing a terrible job at it!.
The North face roofline was used as a marker to calculate the GLOBAL collapse of the entire building.
This is from p44 of NIST NCSTAR 1A:
"The timing of GLOBAL COLLAPSE of WTC7, as indicated by downward motion of the NORTH EXTERIOR FACE, was investigated using a video(...)"
Now quit your crap arguments and quit being a fucking shill !
MORON!
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
No Kidding? The NORTH EXTERIOR FACE? The same thing I told you
six posts ago? That the East Penthouse began the collapse 8 seconds
before? How come the NIST NCSTAR 1A "Probable Collapse Sequence"
has that happening at +9 seconds on their timeline?
Must be a coincidence.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 Fuck off, you just keep changing your arguments, and contradicting yourself.
NIST calculated the GLOBAL COLLAPSE time of WTC7 from the fall of the north face exterior roof line. This is very clearly stated in the NIST report . They didn't do it with a close up on a window that became skyblue to prove the interior collapsed first.
F'ing ridiculous. Get real
They admit the global collapse was in free fall in stage 2.
I've had enough with your BS.
Good bye
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
I haven't changed my argument, or varied my claims, since this began.
YOU, on the other hand, have bounced all over the place, including trying to prove
THIS conspiracy with OTHER conspiracies that are JUST as Stupid.
The BYU staff supported Steven Jones? But they wrote a letter distancing from him,
then called him in, removed him from teaching, and forced him to retire.
Remember that distraction?
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 (continued )
SO they did not have an opinion on his paper. They were pressured to make him leave.
"There were two authors from BYU listed on that paper, Dr. Farrer (as second author) and Daniel Farnsworth. Their affiliation with the BYU Department of Physics and Astronomy was listed in the paper, with the approval of BYU".
Thats why it was peer reviewed at BYU before the goons you protect pressured BYU to make him leave.
Now I' ve had it talking to the traitor you are.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
LMAO, they were pressured to make him leave, by his students.
THEY are the ones who gathered the evidence against him, rather than listen
to his rants and raves, not the College staff. Dr Farrer and Daniel Farnsworth
were ALSO profiteers from the Cold Fusion Debacle that showed Steven
Jones how to make money from Psuedo Science. They are hardly saints
and angels dancing on a pin. They should be prosecuted for public fraud also.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 yeah, yeah, yeah... blah, blah blah.... The paper was also peer reviewed in "The Environmentalist" you can try to smear them as much as you want, and say that all 9 international scientists who worked on this for 18 months did it as a scam for money, but the fact remains the same: the paper has been per reviewed multiple times, and you can't handle that fact.
Now, I wasted enough time on your bullshit and your made up arguments.
Another proof you shills are morons.
Good bye.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
Well, let's see, did the Environmentalist, with the credibility of a a rag sheet,
and NOT a peer review professional magazine call S&J Scientific?
YES, I am saying very expressly that the 9 conspiracy nutjobs fired from
being scientists at MINOR companies and colleges, and three with NO
professional education at all, are FLIM FLAM men, LIARs, Con Artists,
cheats and theieves. Wasn't that OBVIOUS?
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 The paper has been peer reviewed a multiple times. Get over it.
The WTC dust is filled with explosiv residue.
WTC7 fell at free fall speed (admitted by NIST, and impossible unless explosivs were used)
It collapsed symetrically into is own footprint. (impossible with asymetrical damage)
WTC7 was controlled demolished, thus 9-11 was an inside job. You know it, I know it, and I'm fed up with this bullshit, so I'll just keep reposting this comment if you keep trolling.
Good day.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
The Paper is the most obvious example of badly put together bullshit on
the planet. That's why it hasn't been published by any peer review journal
that doesn't require you to PAY THEM for the privelege. In case you don't
understand, two college students followed that up by getting Open Bentham
to publish a paper generated by a NONSENSE jargon generator program.
Pay the $800, and I am sure they would publish your diner menu as a
scientificky document. LMAO
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 The paper has been peer reviewed a MULTIPLE times. Get over it.
The WTC dust is filled with explosiv residue.
WTC7 fell at free fall speed (admitted by NIST, and impossible unless EXPLOSIVS were used)
It collapsed symetrically into is own footprint. (impossible with asymetrical damage)
WTC7 was controlled demolished, thus 9-11 was an inside job. You know it, I know it, and I'm fed up with this bullshit, so I'll just keep reposting this comment if you keep trolling.
Good day.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
The Paper is the most obvious example of badly put together bullshit on
the planet. That's why it hasn't been published by any peer review journal
that doesn't require you to PAY THEM for the privelege. In case you don't
GET IT, you are welcome to try posting that Paper at any NORMAL
peer review Journal. Try not to have TWO journal administrators
REJECT and RESIGN over it. Generally, that's regarded as a BAD
BAD Peer Review, Ya know?
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 What part of "peer reviewed MULTIPLE times" don't you understand?
By the Chair of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at BYU, by The Environmentalist, as well as Bentham.
if it's so easy to get stuff published by Bentham, why don't you shills publish something in a Bentham journal debunking the paper? From what you are saying, Bentham should be happy to take your nonsense for dollars.
For the time being, NOBODY has debunked it in a peer reviewed paper.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
What part of Peer Review Journals do you NOT understand?
NOT ONE conventional Civil Engineering Peer Review Journal has even been
approached, for a version of Steven Jones Fantasy science fiction Paper.
And Lets face it, it wouldn't make it into science fiction either.
The chairman of BYU's Physics and Mathematics department disagrees,
and since there is NO physics and astronomy department. I think he wins.
BTW, ANTI Conspiracy peer reviewed Papers literally FILL the Journals.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 "No physics and astronomy departement at BYU"? FAIL. Google it . Another crap assessment on your behalf. Most of your comments are filled with bullshit like this. I'm seriously fed up with discussing with someone who comes with fals claims all the time. This is a waste of time. Show me one peer reviewed paper who debunks the thermitic material paper, then we can talk. For the time being you have NOTHING, just smears, name calling in factual incorrect remarks. Good bye low life shill
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
LMAO, NOT when Steven Jones was fired. The Physics and Astronomy dept
was created in a BYU regorg when the Math department gained it's own school.
Remember, Dumbshit, we are talking 10 years ago. You want a peer debunking
of Thermite? SURE. checktheevidence. co. uk/cms/index. p hp?option=com_content& task=view&id=326&Itemid=60
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 My God! you are sinking to deeper depths!
Again, do you even know what "peer reviewed" means??
I said: Give me a pear reviewd paper. Not this crap posted on some unknown website by some unknown nobody. And who the fuck is this "T. Mark Hightower" anyways??
As to your ridiculous claim the of the Physics and astronomy department, it was the 2008 Ryan-Gourley-Jones paper that was peer rewied by the chair of that departement.
You are PATHETIC. Good bye
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
The Peer Review Journals are LISTED in the URL I posted to you, Dumbass.
MOST people would read the reference before writing back that it's a LIE.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 your link is as ridiculous and unscientific as you are. There are no peer reviewed journals listed there. And your "T.Mark Hightower" is a nobody who has only written ridiculous articles about 9-11 if you do a quick google search.
Get a fucking life, shill. You are pathetic and I pitty you. I've wasted enough time demonstrating that everything you say is fals, and is as fake as your terrorist attack.
9-11 was an inside job. Get over it and stop being a low life shill.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
YADA YADA YADA, another rant with an IQ below mud.
9/11 was an attack by Al Qaeda, and another muslim terror attack. The same
as 70 attacks in 26 OTHER countries by Al Qaeda. Did George Bush and the
"inside job" crew do THOSE attacks in Mumbai India, Madrid Spain, the UK
on 7/7, Paris France, and the ORIGINAL WTC tower attacks? You could be
more pathetic, but I don't see how.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 If you had ANY geopolitical notion, you'd know that it was the CIA that trained, armed and funded "AL-CIA-DA" in Afghanistan. Its documented that the CIA used Alqaeda in bosnia, and that there is enough evidence to say that CIA has kept contact with al qaeda and used them as they wanted. I'm not going to get into this level of discussion with you, because you've proven to be ridiculous in all you other posts. I've had it with morons like yourself. good bye.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
LMAO, NOT even according to the Russians. The CIA trained and funded the
NORTHERN ALLIANCE, the PAKISTANI trained and funded the Taliban, and
the FOREIGN arabs were trained and funded by OBL and Arab Charities.
THAT was even in "Charlie Wilson's War", but it's been documented by
everybody involved, including the ISI. The Taliban in turn, supported the
Russian puppet for SIX years, before the Northern Coalition went head to
head with the Taliban, AND their guests, Al Qaeda.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@The911watch
LASTLY, let's just refer to OBL BEFORE the 2003 invasion of Afghanistan.
OBL was interviewed by left wing reporter Robert FISK in 1993 and 1996,
and denied that he or anyone in the Foreign born Mujaheddin had been
funded by the US, the ISI, or anyone but themselves. Go look yourself.
Now maybe OBL KNEW in the past you would claim that, because
in 1993, 8 years before 9/11, he was flat out denying it.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 OBL has a long history of working with the americans. We know he was funded by the CIA and that it was the CIA that created the name Al Qaeda ("the base") It was a data base of mujahadeens the CIA could use in different conflicts. ("BBC "power of nightmares")
FBI whistleblower Sybel Edmonds has documented the americans worked with him up until 9-11. "Le Monde" journalist Richard Labevière wrote in july 2001 that OBL was in an american hospital in Dubai and visited by a CIA agent.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch BTW, you are an Idiot.
Sybel Edmonds was hired, as a contractor, to work as an interpreter in the translations unit of the FBI on September 20, 2001. She was suspended by December, and fired in March 2002.
Wow, less than 3 months to learn all the secret programs of the US and the NWO, while being just a contractor for the people Translations unit of the FBI.
Betcha you didn't look up the dates there either, Huh?
VERY Impressive, in an incredibly stupid kinda way.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago
@Merlin5by5 Yes, she had access to doumentation, and was the whistblower of all that she saw. I never said she learned all the secret programs of the US and the NWO, thats just some bullshit you spray because you have no arguments.
Anyways, I'm fed up with talking to you . All I do, is to correct every lie you say, so you jump on some other lie, that I correct, etc
You are a ridiculous man. You have no honour and your shill activity is pathetic.
9-11 was an inside job, get over it.
The911watch 4 months ago
@The911watch
LMAO, are you certified INSANE? Have you ever signed on as a contractor to
an arm of the US government? It can take Three Months just to get accounts
and security tags for the front door. You have to be escorted to your desk for
weeks. Network accounts to login to a workstation can take a month.
That's NOT an exaggeration, I do this all the time, I AM A CONTRACTOR, lol.
The IDEA that a 3 month employee can find the most secret of secrets,
when all she does is translate, is stupid.
Merlin5by5 4 months ago