Is that a 4 rotor Wankle? I remember my RX-7 having a 2 rotor block....... Engine is short lived with only around 120,000 miles (car) between rebuilds ... done that 3x... ceramic seals go bad losing compression...... but it's a hellcat when it's running..... well known for flooding leaving you stranded until the next day... lol
@SouthernPrinceKenny One question, did you ever give that car what it was meant for? As in, a few red lines going down the high way ever week or so? These engines NEED to be driven. Otherwise the carbon would build up. Seafoam would've also increased the life of your engine since it probably didn't see many redlines.
It would probably run a little smoother it you pointed that manifold back... no need for all that air coming from the prop to give it resistance going out.
@downthecrapper hey dipshit...notice the engine is in the REAR of the plane? Its a pusher prop, so the prop wash and exhaust are traveling in the same direction.
Clockwise/counterclockwise has nothing to with direction of thrust. Blade pitch orientation determines thrust force direction. several aircraft have used counter rotating props to counter torque effects along the axis of forward flight.
@finskin231...This is a Velocity aircraft in a pusher setup. The engine is in the rear and the prop pushes the aircraft forward. I guess you assumed the engine was in the front and thats what is confusing you.
Also, the Diamond DA-20 has a Continental 125hp standard reciprocating engine,not a Rotax. I think maybe the Diamond Katana Extreme motorglider may have a Rotax engine.
I have not read through all the questions and comments but, to the untrained eye, the propeller appears to be rotating the wrong way and blowing the air forward instead of backwards over the aircraft. Also when the camera passed in front of the blades, there was a distinct buffet of wind noise. Am I right? If so, why did you do it that way ?
Thanks in advance and my apologies if the question has already been answered..
What kind of fuel usage are you getting running the rotary? I have a little experiance with the old 12A, it was really fun to build that engine up with porting and manifolds,but it used gas like a big V8 when we were done,went like hell though. I always wondered why they weren't more popular in boats, but the fuel consumption for aircraft would seem to me to be a big issue.
How is the radiator getting cooled in the location in front of the engine. Do you have naca scoops in the front feeding it cool air? Looks great by the way !!!
@TheNitschke22 they are very poor on fuel efficiency but have a much better power-to-weight ratio and are alot simpler in construction that traditional piston-type combustion engines.
@Philscbx I would not say they are junk, but I would say that if they are stock they don't fair well in aviation. The rotary is perfect for aircraft because of their ability to stay at a high RPM without stress like there would be on connecting rods and valvetrain.
IMPO, I would leave in my bug where it was meant to be :).
@Boyneedsgames All Gen/Aviation is connecting rods/valve train. As A&P, I reman all types. VW's, something always failed regardless what they tried to modify. It's WOT 93% of the time in flight. That's why Lycoming/Continental rule. Very Solid. But at $20k+, vs $3k modded VW, that's why some die. Also, Belt drive killed my best friend, & co-pilot. Smart guys use Mazda, to Hightech engines of F1, to Superbike. VW's of the 70's, I agree, keep on 4 wheels, you'll live longer.
Also, I have ordered my turbo and am waiting its delivery. I have made a number of modifications and refinements since this video, hopefully for the better.
You are correct, the Mistral is much more expensive. The last I heard it was over $60,000.00. Also, the Mistral is not yet certified by the FAA and availability is questionable (kind moot for me at 60k). I fear the Mistral is pricing itself out of the General Aviation market. Perhaps they wish to recoop investiment too quickly or wanting to focus on the military drone market. I donno, but I question this stratigy. It is my understanding they are selling to Russia for use in helicopters.
thanks for posting. why did you use a mazda conversion instead of a mistral engine? it is certificated and probably less maintenance (i am sure it is a lot more expensive). i have always thought that for internal combustion pistons are not the way to go, rotary/wankel is. only mazda and now mistral have made it work. fly safe!
Not in the DA20...it has a rotax 912 or 914 i don't remember which. They are a 4 cylinder horizontally opposed aircooled engine. I realize that the engine in this video is rotary engine, but the DA20 has a piston engine Rotax.
I've put close to 500,000 miles on RX7 rotaries and I've noted some unique characteristics: They can take very high revs, have low compression, almost never wear out...they just get hard to start. Not much torque at low rpm but very smooth running overall so a gearbox should work great. No belts, cams, gears (except the big inner one) or timing chains. They are also very light weight. Lubrication of the apex seals is a little goofy. It's small, lightweight and reliable.
That's interesting. I thought the problem was that the rotor seals wear. Has that been improved.
I suspect that if the motor industry had put in as much R&D development on the Wankel (Mazda & NSU excepted) as it has on the clumsy Victorian Otto engine then we'd be getting somewhere. And then what about combining one with hybrid technology, it would be brilliant.
Please rest assured the camera man is a VERY capable fellow police officer who would never place himself in harms way. Thanks for the concern though, I can understand why.
@CBarberLaw330 I'm a very capable masturbator, that doesnt qualify me for brain surgery. Just as a police officer has zero inherent knowledge of aircraft and/or safety. If it had shed that prop, he would be directly in harms way.
The engine suggested by Velocity, the Lycoming 320/360 cost around $25k ish. A mid/low time used engine may be around $15 and may be around $18k to rebuild. YMMV of course as it is a changing market. While I have around $15k in my rotary, it is a $1k rebuild with, IMAO, a better platform for aviation. I like the way the rotary works. Cooling seems to be the largest challange and as all alternate aviation engines, ancillary systems need mindful attention. I was able to pay as I go with mine.
Thanks for posting the video, it's great. Next time you film though, could you put up a barrier or something to eliminate the risk of the cameraman accidentally walking into the prop? I felt like I was watching a potential disaster! I don't mean to criticize, just making a suggestion. Thanks again.
I think you may be going by the radius instad of the diameter. Again, it is what the factory suggests. It may acutally be 66. John Slade is flying a rotary powered Co-Z with the same prop with success.
Actually, IIRC, that is a 68 inch prop. Also, you must be mindful of clearance from the ground. You do not want a prop strike. This is the size recommended by Velocity for this power range.
sound like an F1 reno-racer =)
SeafireTWA 10 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hey how close do you need to get before the blades slaps the skin and bones right off of you?
curemymind 3 days ago
Comment removed
curemymind 3 days ago
Is that a carbon fiber prop and is it direct drive to the engine?
carabela125 1 week ago
Wonder what kinda speeds it ill do?
nswiss1975 4 weeks ago
sounds like my rx7 lol when it idle
416street 1 month ago
Wish I could install one in my DA 40.
NORCOAIR 1 month ago
This aircraft looks like a prop-strike waiting to happen!
NSchnatter190 1 month ago
What is GPH burn at cruise?
EzraHilyer 2 months ago
Comment removed
roamerreed 4 weeks ago
What is GPH burn at cruise?
EzraHilyer 2 months ago
Such a perfect aircraft motor on such a sleek aircraft. Must be fast
40joel 3 months ago
how much rpm does this baby go?
alabala327 4 months ago
great! ...but, can you grate cheese with it?
hgratp 4 months ago
dem stcs
blinginlike3p0 4 months ago
Is that a 4 rotor Wankle? I remember my RX-7 having a 2 rotor block....... Engine is short lived with only around 120,000 miles (car) between rebuilds ... done that 3x... ceramic seals go bad losing compression...... but it's a hellcat when it's running..... well known for flooding leaving you stranded until the next day... lol
SouthernPrinceKenny 5 months ago
@SouthernPrinceKenny One question, did you ever give that car what it was meant for? As in, a few red lines going down the high way ever week or so? These engines NEED to be driven. Otherwise the carbon would build up. Seafoam would've also increased the life of your engine since it probably didn't see many redlines.
XHyperxNovaX 4 months ago
It would probably run a little smoother it you pointed that manifold back... no need for all that air coming from the prop to give it resistance going out.
downthecrapper 5 months ago
@downthecrapper hey dipshit...notice the engine is in the REAR of the plane? Its a pusher prop, so the prop wash and exhaust are traveling in the same direction.
Duckyistrippin 5 months ago
@Duckyistrippin youre silly
downthecrapper 4 months ago
Does it glide well..? Hehe!: )
winterstellar 5 months ago
Ah yes I see what you've done there, but the real question is.... will it blend?
BurnTheBlue 5 months ago
Comment removed
celsocorbelia 6 months ago
you are mad being up in the air with one of these unreliable pieces of crap strapped to the back of your plane. R.I.P
roffy89 6 months ago
"Wankel" is the NAME of the Inventor. NOT wankle.
dawoderpfeffer 6 months ago
Sounds like a little R.C. Plane. ie. a toy. Oh, well...
lakewood85 6 months ago
ricer
UunonMopo 6 months ago
kick aSS!!!!!!!
MrHarlanDale 6 months ago
why use the wastegate hole for the exhaust?
Tj1056 7 months ago
Wait till you gotta top off the oil mid flight!!!!!
mviperdude 7 months ago
My Buick Century runs better
bma852 7 months ago
I thought the prop was on the wrong way round, then realised it was a rear engined plane
jonnyawball 7 months ago
it sounded like it was miss Firing there
fatman5156 7 months ago
there's some serious horsepower there and beautiful exhaust note....
CanardAircraft 7 months ago
haha look at the radiator behind the engine, there is what appears to be an automotive pusher fan on it...
montey1017 8 months ago
I was hopping the camera was gonna go flying out his/her hands lol only funny if they had all digits after the fact lmfao :D
blaze7191 8 months ago
sexy >:)
RoboTekno 9 months ago
So wheres the video of the baby flying?!!!
Triple88a 10 months ago
that aint' turbo
Ricmcspeedy987 10 months ago
kurwa ale toto napierdala
dankessss 11 months ago
WHOA DUDE DON'T WALK SO CLOSE!!! YOU MADE ME NERVOUS!! LOL
Monstertalon 11 months ago 19
Clockwise/counterclockwise has nothing to with direction of thrust. Blade pitch orientation determines thrust force direction. several aircraft have used counter rotating props to counter torque effects along the axis of forward flight.
pinwizz69 11 months ago
Don´t go near it. The engine will kill you! LOL sarcasm but also not! :D
TheRealFobican 1 year ago
@finskin231...This is a Velocity aircraft in a pusher setup. The engine is in the rear and the prop pushes the aircraft forward. I guess you assumed the engine was in the front and thats what is confusing you.
Also, the Diamond DA-20 has a Continental 125hp standard reciprocating engine,not a Rotax. I think maybe the Diamond Katana Extreme motorglider may have a Rotax engine.
jamclay 1 year ago
Nice
cesarcano1985 1 year ago
I have not read through all the questions and comments but, to the untrained eye, the propeller appears to be rotating the wrong way and blowing the air forward instead of backwards over the aircraft. Also when the camera passed in front of the blades, there was a distinct buffet of wind noise. Am I right? If so, why did you do it that way ?
Thanks in advance and my apologies if the question has already been answered..
finskin231 1 year ago
it only need a turbo now...
nazzop 1 year ago 2
What kind of fuel usage are you getting running the rotary? I have a little experiance with the old 12A, it was really fun to build that engine up with porting and manifolds,but it used gas like a big V8 when we were done,went like hell though. I always wondered why they weren't more popular in boats, but the fuel consumption for aircraft would seem to me to be a big issue.
Oldbmwr100rs 1 year ago
stick your hand in it, please. >:)
soysawce1 1 year ago
wankel... lol
nolannolys 1 year ago 5
How is the radiator getting cooled in the location in front of the engine. Do you have naca scoops in the front feeding it cool air? Looks great by the way !!!
bluemax66 1 year ago
@bluemax66 rad fan and enough room to let the heat escape
SpikeZeek 1 year ago
It sounds like an rx7 or 8
MrMontagio 1 year ago
Comment removed
cheerdiver 1 year ago
Did U consider the 20B, 3 rotor?
Is this a reduced drive, if so what is the eff of the drive?
I wondered if the hummingbird helo could be fitted for the 20B w/ a change in gearing for the higher RPM.
Cooling seems to be of primary concern.
cheerdiver 1 year ago
Are the Wankel motors more efficient than traditional combustion engines?
TheNitschke22 1 year ago
@TheNitschke22 they are very poor on fuel efficiency but have a much better power-to-weight ratio and are alot simpler in construction that traditional piston-type combustion engines.
Bamchucknorris 1 year ago
Another great application for the MAZDA rotary engine!
Light and very compact for its power output, it is a good choice.
The only automotive engine I know of used in aircraft in recently was the VW air-cooled flat four used in Ultra-Lights
OzzInter 1 year ago
@OzzInter ' VW air-cooled flat four used in Ultra-Lights'
Totally junk compared to Wankel.
More pilots have gone down w/VW in corn fields or died because of them.
Wankel has been used in light aircraft since mid eighties when Coors Lite experimental used them.
Philscbx 1 year ago
@Philscbx I would not say they are junk, but I would say that if they are stock they don't fair well in aviation. The rotary is perfect for aircraft because of their ability to stay at a high RPM without stress like there would be on connecting rods and valvetrain.
IMPO, I would leave in my bug where it was meant to be :).
Boyneedsgames 1 year ago
Philscbx 1 year ago
@Philscbx More light aircraft have gone down that were running VW motors simply because there were more light aircraft using VW motors.
hypnolobster 1 year ago
@hypnolobster
People use $50 junk yard scrap VW motors because they looked like real engines similar in shape from a distance.
These people are not engine builders by trade.
VW is barely a step above B&S.
Now compare 100hp rebuilt Lycoming at $10K.
The engineering inside a Lycoming or Continental is so incredibly different.
Very few people see the insides of normal engines let alone real aircraft.
Cheers
Philscbx 1 year ago
Well, have you figured out that Wankels are basically crap yet?
schlusselmensch 1 year ago
sounds amazeing
darkeyce02 1 year ago
This motor is full of RPMs its about time someone used one..
I remember in School in Elk Grove Village Chicago they had one on a boat and that thing was fast as hell.
keefer2111 1 year ago
Great engine, inspired design, but this rotary here does miss fire every so often!
TheTVLicence 1 year ago
lol Ricer plane
XxAtomic646xX 1 year ago
Also, I have ordered my turbo and am waiting its delivery. I have made a number of modifications and refinements since this video, hopefully for the better.
CBarberLaw330 1 year ago
You are correct, the Mistral is much more expensive. The last I heard it was over $60,000.00. Also, the Mistral is not yet certified by the FAA and availability is questionable (kind moot for me at 60k). I fear the Mistral is pricing itself out of the General Aviation market. Perhaps they wish to recoop investiment too quickly or wanting to focus on the military drone market. I donno, but I question this stratigy. It is my understanding they are selling to Russia for use in helicopters.
CBarberLaw330 1 year ago
thanks for posting. why did you use a mazda conversion instead of a mistral engine? it is certificated and probably less maintenance (i am sure it is a lot more expensive). i have always thought that for internal combustion pistons are not the way to go, rotary/wankel is. only mazda and now mistral have made it work. fly safe!
amramjose 1 year ago
Awesome work.
Parag0n 2 years ago
hahah is that a long ez? I love those things. neet little airplane
DARKSCOPE001 2 years ago
emagine that in an 93 rx-7 lol
catfisher10100 2 years ago
@catfisher10100 *imagine and that is an rx7 engine they just mounted it backwords
artilistic 2 years ago
if there is a turbo you need a bypass and you would here the wisel noise.
Second if you have a turbo you would able to see the turbo exhaust and the down pipe which goes with it. from the exhaust menifold
Shazee083 2 years ago
I just love the starter sound.
MrQuattro4WD 2 years ago 3
Wankle plane Engine. YIKES ! BING YOUR SHOOT
poolmotorrepairguyFL 2 years ago
yep thats a rotary alright you can't reall hear it but you can still hear the jumpy sound the rotary makes
2346 2 years ago 22
sounds like an rc plane!!! i love it!!!
monono954 2 years ago 2
Fly away!!!
MisterHolaMan 2 years ago 3
COOL!
haider87 2 years ago
this engine seems to be turbocharged at the beginning cause you see the exhaust...
but hay.. niice rotary... the sound in idle <3 brrrm brrrm brrrm
michael9515 2 years ago
uhmm how can u tell that its turbocharged because of the exhaust?...
and Also... WHERE IS THE TURBO in that case?
TheReaperDK 2 years ago 2
there's no turbo on that thing.
starbuck680 2 years ago 3
thats cause its a turbo manifold but exhuast is flowing through the wastegate ports instead. = budget style
emtrixdk 2 years ago 3
i said at the beginning not now... once it had the turbo because the manifold plate where turbo bolts on... there is non turbo now on...
michael9515 2 years ago
Those engines are very reliable
JuanPapaNicolao 2 years ago 2
Me too!!!
sailordiver2007 2 years ago
I'm a pilot and i'd fly it
Airundermywings 2 years ago 2
ahh, music to my ears!!!
Bamchucknorris 2 years ago
you should put the turbo back on it
therealmaximus 2 years ago
The engine originally had a turbocharger on it.
douro20 2 years ago
Comment removed
douro20 2 years ago
you gotta make a better header if you arent going to run turbo
:(
slimeball6969 2 years ago
Doesn't the Diamond DA20 have a rotary engine...?at least some of them do
aceflyer89 2 years ago
no the DA-20 has a standard reciprocal engine. The twins have deisel engines.
jamclay 2 years ago
So none of the Diamond Aircraft have rotary engines. Or?
aceflyer89 2 years ago
Not that I am aware of.
jamclay 2 years ago
i believe you are thinking of its Rotax engine, but its a standard piston.
msekavec 2 years ago 2
no it's a rotary engine with no pistons
itsumonihon 2 years ago 3
Not in the DA20...it has a rotax 912 or 914 i don't remember which. They are a 4 cylinder horizontally opposed aircooled engine. I realize that the engine in this video is rotary engine, but the DA20 has a piston engine Rotax.
msekavec 2 years ago
Mazda is the main if not only manufacturer of rotaries for cars but the rest just try wiki. There's just to much to type here.
blyndrotor 2 years ago
It's called "Wankel" not Wankle!
BrianSupreme 2 years ago 4
expensive hair dryer
kingbleah 3 years ago
wow!!!!!!...............NOT FUNNY!!!
ImportsAreBetter 3 years ago 9
I've put close to 500,000 miles on RX7 rotaries and I've noted some unique characteristics: They can take very high revs, have low compression, almost never wear out...they just get hard to start. Not much torque at low rpm but very smooth running overall so a gearbox should work great. No belts, cams, gears (except the big inner one) or timing chains. They are also very light weight. Lubrication of the apex seals is a little goofy. It's small, lightweight and reliable.
MGB1977Red 3 years ago 5
That's interesting. I thought the problem was that the rotor seals wear. Has that been improved.
I suspect that if the motor industry had put in as much R&D development on the Wankel (Mazda & NSU excepted) as it has on the clumsy Victorian Otto engine then we'd be getting somewhere. And then what about combining one with hybrid technology, it would be brilliant.
trossachs2003 2 years ago 4
They got a hydrogen 13B rx8
blyndrotor 2 years ago
DO YOU FEEL SAFE? That's the question! I<3rotary but in a plane it kinda scares me HA! cool vid tho didnt think there was many rotary planes still.
sh3lbot 3 years ago
Please rest assured the camera man is a VERY capable fellow police officer who would never place himself in harms way. Thanks for the concern though, I can understand why.
CBarberLaw330 3 years ago
@CBarberLaw330 I'm a very capable masturbator, that doesnt qualify me for brain surgery. Just as a police officer has zero inherent knowledge of aircraft and/or safety. If it had shed that prop, he would be directly in harms way.
Duckyistrippin 5 months ago
The engine suggested by Velocity, the Lycoming 320/360 cost around $25k ish. A mid/low time used engine may be around $15 and may be around $18k to rebuild. YMMV of course as it is a changing market. While I have around $15k in my rotary, it is a $1k rebuild with, IMAO, a better platform for aviation. I like the way the rotary works. Cooling seems to be the largest challange and as all alternate aviation engines, ancillary systems need mindful attention. I was able to pay as I go with mine.
CBarberLaw330 3 years ago
Nice, 13b rotary? Wish my FD could fly too.
Barbarian216 3 years ago
Thanks for posting the video, it's great. Next time you film though, could you put up a barrier or something to eliminate the risk of the cameraman accidentally walking into the prop? I felt like I was watching a potential disaster! I don't mean to criticize, just making a suggestion. Thanks again.
mike
AFM528 3 years ago
is it a car motor?
Nissera 3 years ago
I think you may be going by the radius instad of the diameter. Again, it is what the factory suggests. It may acutally be 66. John Slade is flying a rotary powered Co-Z with the same prop with success.
CBarberLaw330 3 years ago
That much power needs a bigger propeller. Such as 60"
acharad 3 years ago
Actually, IIRC, that is a 68 inch prop. Also, you must be mindful of clearance from the ground. You do not want a prop strike. This is the size recommended by Velocity for this power range.
CBarberLaw330 3 years ago
68" with tips off. It seems not much more than 35"
acharad 3 years ago
NO wayyyyyyyy
xshyguyx06 3 years ago
that is wicked! what is that a little 12a?
coopersuperfastguy 3 years ago
Not really, the description states 13B, but I'm not sure..
JZX100Chaser 3 years ago
Way to go Chris!!!!!
amillin 3 years ago