The 70's Movie wasn't so good but when I saw this one, it was Amazing! It had my favorite actors: Freddie Highmore had Amazing Talent in this film, and Johnny deep..... Jesus Christ, He Was INCREDIBLY FUNNY! LMFAO!
I remember being in 3rd grade & I was glued to the T.V. praying that this trailer would come on, because I was so obsessed with Willy Wonka. (Only because I thought he was sooo cute) I always freaked out when the trailer came on. :) I still think Johnny Depp as Willly Wonka is sexyy ;) He's sexy in general.DUH! Excellent movie
I first read the book when I was 7 years old... the 1st movie came out when I was 10. I remember being disappointed in the movie when I first saw it, mainly because the Wonka character (though wonderfully played by Gene Wilder!) didn't capture at all the character I'd imagined from the books, and the oompa loompas, were just way wrong. This version, "rapes" the Wonka character even worse - though loompas were a 'tad' better - I'd have loved to have seen (when he was alive) maybe George Carlin.
@AliceElphabaWonka No, actually I grew to become very fond of the original; mainly because Gene Wilder was (in my opinion) such a wonderful actor & did this role (as most all his movie roles) with such passion. As a kid, though, I felt a bit betrayed by the story I loved so dearly not being (what I felt) 'true' to Dahl's book. The Slugworth character and Jack Albertson as Grandpa were pretty well portrayed.. as was Verouka, Violet, and Augustus Gloop. (but Charlie stealing the gobstopper??!)
I know most people have a different opinion, and that's fair enough but I still prefer the older one from 1971. I don't know why, I guess I just prefer Gene Wilder's take on Willy Wonka...
Plus I think the actors were more realistic but that's just my opinion ^^
xDD I can't help but love the part when Johnny says "chewing gum is really gross: shewing gum i hate the most..." and it's a guilty pleasure of mine to watch him smack into the clear flying elevator over and over.... ROFL
God, I'm so tired of everybody saying this is a remake of the old 70's movie, it's not a remake, it's an adaption of the original book, it's actually a better adaption than the old movie, this one is much closer to the acutal story han the old one, which changed almost everything in the story. And the kids in the old movie couldn't act, but the kids in this new movie can. And Johnny Depp is an awesome actor! XD
couldn't agree more,Niobesnuppa. Much, much truer to the original Dahl book, and (on a personal level truer to what I imagined as a kid in the 70s when reading it).
Didn't like the Wilder version AT ALL. This isn't fantastic, but (tech aside) vastly superior. And Depp is magnificent as always.
Right. And LOL, you heard that Gene Wilder got really pissed off at Tim Burton and Johnny Depp for making a new version of the story? xD He said something that all they cared about was money why else would they "remake Willy Wonka?", then Johnny Depp said that it wasn't a remake, it was another adaption of the book and that it was made 'cause they weren't satisfied with how the old movie had changed everything in the story.
I was a little kid when I first saw the 70s version, and I was very aware I was just watching a movie. I was 20 when I first saw THIS version, and I believed it as it was happening. *lol*
@Niobesnuppa this one is shit. The old one was more like the book. They couldn't do the squirrel scene cos they had a low budget and no computer. And the old will wonker was way better. Johnney depp is a great actor but the way tim burton made him out was gay. So i think the old was better. Also this had a ton of gay family shit in it!
@Niobesnuppa I KNOW!! And I don't understand people who claim that the old 70's movie is "closer" to the original book. Its like are you kidding me?? Visually Burton's film looks closer like the boat, it has the squirells, the oompa loompa song lyrics are the same from the book, and in the book Wonka wasn't quoting Shakespear all over the place like the 70's one. Plus, the tone: it's a children's book, so it has to have a crazy feel.
@Niobesnuppa I disagree.. because if a book is made into a movie & the movie becomes a classic (say: "The Wizard of Oz" with Judy Garland... or "Gone with the Wind") any movie that follows the same storyline would have to be considered a remake (that's my take on it, anyway). Just like when they made "The Wiz" with Diana Ross & MJ, it was an entirely different sort of movie, but it had the same basic storyline (premise) to it, so I'd have to consider it a remake; yeah. It's debatable, sure..
@JamesSCameron Can't really say I agree with you on that. That would mean that every Snow White movie made after 1937 must be seen as a remake of the old Disney movie just because they're based on the same story. And let's not forget that the "remake" is actually more true to the novel than the "original".
@Niobesnuppa and I beg to differ with you, on it being more true to the original novel.. in some aspects yes; in others, absolutely not. I'll stick by my original definition, but I can (and do!) respect yours or any other opinion - that's what makes the world interesting, I believe. (By the way, Disney's (animated) Snow White IS, and always will be, the one and only original in my book - it too is a "classic". No doubt!) Q: Can there be a remake of a classic that is also a "classic"? Hm..
@JamesSCameron But isn't it possible that there are several adaptions of the same story, without anyone being a remake of the other? When this movie was never intended to be a remake of the old one but rather an individual adaption of the same story? It's a bit wrong that the first film adaption is "the one" adaption and all other adaptions must be remakes of that, especially when the author of the novel it's based on actually hated the first flm adaption. But sure, let's just agree to disagree.
@JamesSCameron in a way, yes a remake can be a classic. almost every disney cartoon is a rip off of some older movie or story. Beauty and the Beast is a classic and it ripped off an old French movie of a similar name.
@Niobesnuppa There's been none to date that I can say that about (remake being a classic as well .. in it's own right... but It 'could' happen I suppose (again, purely my own "opinion" here) ;o)
@Niobesnuppa Once again, I can't figure out how people think this movie is closer to the novel then Willy Wonka And The Chocolate Factory is! The entire half of the movie is focused on the subplot about Willy Wonka and his daddy that wasn't in the book, and the whole entire ending of the movie was different from the book! The 71 adaptation did EVERYTHING accurate to the book. The only thing the changed was the very small Slubworth plot.
@SitOnPickle Check it up on Wikipedia. Roald Dahl actually hated the 71 movie because it wasn't true to the novel at all, making everying too fuzzy and cute for his liking (Roald Dahl's novels are always full of dark humor). His family was satisfied with this movie because they felt this was truer to the novel.
@Niobesnuppa Dahl hated the 71 version because he was a grumpy old man who is never satisfied with the his adaptations unless it follows almost perfectly the story. What was cute and fuzzy in WWATCF? Yes, Dahl's books are full of dark humor. WWATCF had plenty of dark humor. I don't trust Dahl's families judgement on the adaptation, they're not the author. For all I know, they could have no sense of art. Dahl was ticked off when they changed the ending to Witches, yet Tim's ending is ok?
@SitOnPickle Seriously, why are you so angry anyway? It's just a movie. If you don't like this movie, there's no forcing you to watch it, just like there's no forcing me to watch the 71 version.
This trailer is so misleading, the actual movie is so much darker... and better! I almost crapped myself when I saw this in the theater because it was so much better than I thought it would be.
the movie was FANtastic !!! Johnny did such a super job !! he's so talented and makes you really believe his character is totally nuts!!! i love the movie and i love Johnny Depp!!!!!
Even if the trailer was cute the movie is even better! Very rarely the movie is better than the trailer, but this one is! And when we know that Johnny is in it... mmm. Even in this part he is sooo sexy, I don`t know how is he doing it, but he is so magical in every way... And he`s an awesome actor! If I could live in the chocolate factory with him...
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS. You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved
The 70's Movie wasn't so good but when I saw this one, it was Amazing! It had my favorite actors: Freddie Highmore had Amazing Talent in this film, and Johnny deep..... Jesus Christ, He Was INCREDIBLY FUNNY! LMFAO!
zingarzahoy26 2 weeks ago
When I first seen this trailer, I got friggin' Excited
zingarzahoy26 3 weeks ago
I remember being in 3rd grade & I was glued to the T.V. praying that this trailer would come on, because I was so obsessed with Willy Wonka. (Only because I thought he was sooo cute) I always freaked out when the trailer came on. :) I still think Johnny Depp as Willly Wonka is sexyy ;) He's sexy in general.DUH! Excellent movie
123Oreoz4u 4 months ago
veruca salt, is she played by danny from cimorelli?
annabellovelove 4 months ago
haha that kid at 0:11 looks like Lars Ulrich
trustobey1016 5 months ago
Oh, I really miss this movie.
The spoiled kids, the candy, the Oompa Loompas, Johnny Depp hitting his head on stuff every now and then...
*sigh*
Iced0826 6 months ago
I hate Tim Burton, and Johnny Depp. However, this movie is awesome.
mardfet 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mardfet it must be good then.
AaronTrutsJC 6 months ago
0:42
SerbanMovieStudio 8 months ago
lol yeah this is much closer to the original plot except for Count fucking Dooku checking up his teeth.
SwitchToFlux 8 months ago
0.42 scary face haaa
timlovesyoudotcom 11 months ago
can you make charlie and the chocolate factory 2 in 2013
jonathan68889 1 year ago
I first read the book when I was 7 years old... the 1st movie came out when I was 10. I remember being disappointed in the movie when I first saw it, mainly because the Wonka character (though wonderfully played by Gene Wilder!) didn't capture at all the character I'd imagined from the books, and the oompa loompas, were just way wrong. This version, "rapes" the Wonka character even worse - though loompas were a 'tad' better - I'd have loved to have seen (when he was alive) maybe George Carlin.
JamesSCameron 1 year ago
@JamesSCameron So you don't like either one??
AliceElphabaWonka 1 year ago
@AliceElphabaWonka No, actually I grew to become very fond of the original; mainly because Gene Wilder was (in my opinion) such a wonderful actor & did this role (as most all his movie roles) with such passion. As a kid, though, I felt a bit betrayed by the story I loved so dearly not being (what I felt) 'true' to Dahl's book. The Slugworth character and Jack Albertson as Grandpa were pretty well portrayed.. as was Verouka, Violet, and Augustus Gloop. (but Charlie stealing the gobstopper??!)
JamesSCameron 1 year ago
0:30 "ew!"
YeOldeCastle 1 year ago
Lets boogie 0:07
25maxoz 1 year ago
I know most people have a different opinion, and that's fair enough but I still prefer the older one from 1971. I don't know why, I guess I just prefer Gene Wilder's take on Willy Wonka...
Plus I think the actors were more realistic but that's just my opinion ^^
RoxasGF 1 year ago
0:32 sounds like augustus farted! lol
connorhall08 1 year ago
Comment removed
connorhall08 1 year ago
this is my fav kids film! oh and the gene wilder classic
thedoctor2199 2 years ago
I liked this better than the original.
I thought Johnny Depp was sexy even as Willy Wonka :P
MizzGoodBar16 2 years ago 16
xDD I can't help but love the part when Johnny says "chewing gum is really gross: shewing gum i hate the most..." and it's a guilty pleasure of mine to watch him smack into the clear flying elevator over and over.... ROFL
twilightnephilim 2 years ago 3
i just love 0:13 it is soo cute
emofairy007 2 years ago 3
love it
Patriotfrosh15 2 years ago 2
God, I'm so tired of everybody saying this is a remake of the old 70's movie, it's not a remake, it's an adaption of the original book, it's actually a better adaption than the old movie, this one is much closer to the acutal story han the old one, which changed almost everything in the story. And the kids in the old movie couldn't act, but the kids in this new movie can. And Johnny Depp is an awesome actor! XD
Niobesnuppa 2 years ago 33
couldn't agree more,Niobesnuppa. Much, much truer to the original Dahl book, and (on a personal level truer to what I imagined as a kid in the 70s when reading it).
Didn't like the Wilder version AT ALL. This isn't fantastic, but (tech aside) vastly superior. And Depp is magnificent as always.
sussexpenguin 2 years ago 3
Right. And LOL, you heard that Gene Wilder got really pissed off at Tim Burton and Johnny Depp for making a new version of the story? xD He said something that all they cared about was money why else would they "remake Willy Wonka?", then Johnny Depp said that it wasn't a remake, it was another adaption of the book and that it was made 'cause they weren't satisfied with how the old movie had changed everything in the story.
Niobesnuppa 2 years ago 7
Depp had it right then!
sussexpenguin 2 years ago
Yeps! ^^
Niobesnuppa 2 years ago 2
I was a little kid when I first saw the 70s version, and I was very aware I was just watching a movie. I was 20 when I first saw THIS version, and I believed it as it was happening. *lol*
Bobzeaux 2 years ago 2
@Bobzeaux
LOL, same here. xD
Niobesnuppa 1 year ago
@Niobesnuppa this one is shit. The old one was more like the book. They couldn't do the squirrel scene cos they had a low budget and no computer. And the old will wonker was way better. Johnney depp is a great actor but the way tim burton made him out was gay. So i think the old was better. Also this had a ton of gay family shit in it!
crapfactoryfilms 1 year ago
@crapfactoryfilms Exactly how was the old one more like the book? Have you even read the book?
And this one has tons of "gay family shit" in it? And the old one didn't? *Sarcasm*
Niobesnuppa 1 year ago
@Niobesnuppa I KNOW!! And I don't understand people who claim that the old 70's movie is "closer" to the original book. Its like are you kidding me?? Visually Burton's film looks closer like the boat, it has the squirells, the oompa loompa song lyrics are the same from the book, and in the book Wonka wasn't quoting Shakespear all over the place like the 70's one. Plus, the tone: it's a children's book, so it has to have a crazy feel.
AliceElphabaWonka 1 year ago
@Niobesnuppa I disagree.. because if a book is made into a movie & the movie becomes a classic (say: "The Wizard of Oz" with Judy Garland... or "Gone with the Wind") any movie that follows the same storyline would have to be considered a remake (that's my take on it, anyway). Just like when they made "The Wiz" with Diana Ross & MJ, it was an entirely different sort of movie, but it had the same basic storyline (premise) to it, so I'd have to consider it a remake; yeah. It's debatable, sure..
JamesSCameron 1 year ago
@JamesSCameron Can't really say I agree with you on that. That would mean that every Snow White movie made after 1937 must be seen as a remake of the old Disney movie just because they're based on the same story. And let's not forget that the "remake" is actually more true to the novel than the "original".
Niobesnuppa 1 year ago
@Niobesnuppa and I beg to differ with you, on it being more true to the original novel.. in some aspects yes; in others, absolutely not. I'll stick by my original definition, but I can (and do!) respect yours or any other opinion - that's what makes the world interesting, I believe. (By the way, Disney's (animated) Snow White IS, and always will be, the one and only original in my book - it too is a "classic". No doubt!) Q: Can there be a remake of a classic that is also a "classic"? Hm..
JamesSCameron 1 year ago
@JamesSCameron But isn't it possible that there are several adaptions of the same story, without anyone being a remake of the other? When this movie was never intended to be a remake of the old one but rather an individual adaption of the same story? It's a bit wrong that the first film adaption is "the one" adaption and all other adaptions must be remakes of that, especially when the author of the novel it's based on actually hated the first flm adaption. But sure, let's just agree to disagree.
Niobesnuppa 1 year ago
@JamesSCameron in a way, yes a remake can be a classic. almost every disney cartoon is a rip off of some older movie or story. Beauty and the Beast is a classic and it ripped off an old French movie of a similar name.
dairyduck 9 months ago
@Niobesnuppa There's been none to date that I can say that about (remake being a classic as well .. in it's own right... but It 'could' happen I suppose (again, purely my own "opinion" here) ;o)
JamesSCameron 1 year ago
@Niobesnuppa Once again, I can't figure out how people think this movie is closer to the novel then Willy Wonka And The Chocolate Factory is! The entire half of the movie is focused on the subplot about Willy Wonka and his daddy that wasn't in the book, and the whole entire ending of the movie was different from the book! The 71 adaptation did EVERYTHING accurate to the book. The only thing the changed was the very small Slubworth plot.
SitOnPickle 6 months ago
@SitOnPickle Check it up on Wikipedia. Roald Dahl actually hated the 71 movie because it wasn't true to the novel at all, making everying too fuzzy and cute for his liking (Roald Dahl's novels are always full of dark humor). His family was satisfied with this movie because they felt this was truer to the novel.
Niobesnuppa 6 months ago
@Niobesnuppa Dahl hated the 71 version because he was a grumpy old man who is never satisfied with the his adaptations unless it follows almost perfectly the story. What was cute and fuzzy in WWATCF? Yes, Dahl's books are full of dark humor. WWATCF had plenty of dark humor. I don't trust Dahl's families judgement on the adaptation, they're not the author. For all I know, they could have no sense of art. Dahl was ticked off when they changed the ending to Witches, yet Tim's ending is ok?
SitOnPickle 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SitOnPickle Seriously, why are you so angry anyway? It's just a movie. If you don't like this movie, there's no forcing you to watch it, just like there's no forcing me to watch the 71 version.
Niobesnuppa 6 months ago
@Niobesnuppa i felt this film lacked soul
nintymark64 5 months ago
great movie. and i love this trailer.
oscarthegrouch027 3 years ago 3
0:33 is the best.
mildetryth 3 years ago
0:49 xD lmao I LOVE THIS MOVIE!! =]
and Johnny Depp, he's the best actor ever =]
SkidleIdo 3 years ago
This trailer is so misleading, the actual movie is so much darker... and better! I almost crapped myself when I saw this in the theater because it was so much better than I thought it would be.
SpongyOLlama 3 years ago
haha,he is so sarcastic
I just LOVE him ^^
hah:)
"chewing gum is really gross,
chewing gum i hate the most"
lmao x)
you gotta love mr.Wonka ;)
and the fact that johnny depp plays that character makes it even better<33
great talent,great candy,great movie:)
jennysiita 3 years ago
the movie was FANtastic !!! Johnny did such a super job !! he's so talented and makes you really believe his character is totally nuts!!! i love the movie and i love Johnny Depp!!!!!
PiratesFan63 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
God I hate the remake. The original is so much better.
metalhead9969 3 years ago
Well, that just shows just how stupid you are.
This isn't a remake.
eldospinks 3 years ago 3
LOL
metalhead9969 3 years ago 2
i have watched this movie like non-stop this week (and the past week) and my sisters r about ready 2 kill me!!!!!!!!!
CHRISTIANgirl95 3 years ago
ha omg! i love this frakin movie i love jhonny hes sooooooooooo funny in this movie i was like crakin up wiht his facehaha
johnnydeppforever1 3 years ago
lol at teh end
DarthBane123 3 years ago
Even if the trailer was cute the movie is even better! Very rarely the movie is better than the trailer, but this one is! And when we know that Johnny is in it... mmm. Even in this part he is sooo sexy, I don`t know how is he doing it, but he is so magical in every way... And he`s an awesome actor! If I could live in the chocolate factory with him...
lollymanson 3 years ago
lewl
novemberthe5th 3 years ago
i really like the older version but i love this one the most
lildevil517 3 years ago 3
♫♫ Chewing Gum Is Really Gross
♫♫ Chewing Gum I Hate The Most ♫♫
xD
Classic..Ox♥
Miley930 3 years ago 4
Willy Wonka, Willy Wonka,
The amazing Chocolateer,
Willy Wonka, Willy Wonka,
Everybody give a cheer!
holymasterchief 4 years ago 2
i'm going to like this guy! =)
weryweryfany 4 years ago
The grandpa going "Yipeee!!!!!!"
XD
Classic.
EXRazeBurn 4 years ago 2
LOLOLOL.....
EnduroCrazedManiac 4 years ago
I love this movie !!!!!!!! It is quite funny and a very fun and original film deserved a trailer so funny and original as this
patypirate 4 years ago
BETTER THAN THE ORIGINAL ONE!
zanessarockz7 4 years ago 4
Chewing gum is really gross, chewing gum I hate the most lol Classic
schumnader 4 years ago 4
i lu willy and johnny depp
SuperJuniorSaranghae 4 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
PLEASE DON'T READ THIS. You will get kissed on the nearest possible Friday by the love of your life. Tomorrow will be the best day of your life. However, if you don't post this comment to at least 3 videos, you will die within 2 days. Copy and paste this, to be saved
potsiiscool 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
copy and paste this to 10 videos or your mum will die within the next 4 hours
yaknowxo 4 years ago
get a life loser, instead of putting this crap in the video's comments
PrincessSophie83 4 years ago
Why the hell wasn't this included on the DVD?! >:(
Bobzeaux 5 years ago 3
i know really
harrylover5544 4 years ago 2