3.08 Federal Income Tax

[imatelly]

people need to tell the full truth,if someone stops paying taxes all together you will get arested,remember you can stop paying the incom tax, maybe make a church and you can stop paying sales tax,elect ron paul and you can stop paying SS,but them other taxes better get payed or your going to be mad your arested.

[MSM586]

The word income is not defined in the internal revenue code

Us vs Ballard 535 f .2d 400,404 it can be only be a derivative of corporate activity

The supreme court has held this numerous times

Income tax is supposed to be for corporations it's a fraud

[RetSquid]

@Hybridnight

What did I mix up? She didn't pay taxes on her personal income/wages.

[kdkmo]

A bad law is still a bad law even if it is the law. Taxing people directly on their earnings is the government claiming ownership of people's labor and that is also known as slavery. Taxing of incomes by any level of government, federal, state or local is a clear violation of human rights of ownership of themselves and their labor. That's the way I see it. And by the way, making you file is forcing you to bear witness against yourself and that's a violation of rights.

[Tealy855]

"NO TAXATION WITHOUT CLARIFICATION"

[frank12379able]

title 26 is not a positive law.

[RetSquid]

@frank12379able

The Internal Revenue Code of 1954 was passed by both houses of Congress as House Resolution 8300, and was signed by President Eisenhower on August 16, 1954, at about 9:45 a.m., becoming Public Law 83-591, 68A Stat. 3. The Internal Revenue Code (Title 26) is now known as the “Internal Revenue Code of 1986” as a result of changes made by Public Law 99-514, 100 Stat. 2085 (10/22/1986).

[RetSquid]

All four of those points are absolutely wrong.

Jackson is in jail for not filing income tax.

[myOATHmyCREED]

@RetSquid depends on what is allowed in as evidence. Learn your laws.

[RetSquid]

@myOATHmyCREED

What would you like to be allowed as evidence?

You can't argue that the law is not the law at a trial.

[deltapunk21]

The money goes to those invested in treasuries which are fucking worthless and LOSE MONEY BECAUSE THE INFLATION RATE IS HIGHER THAN THE DAMN INTREST RATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is a Nationalized leftist economy destroying power and control centralized socialist Karl Marx inspired "BANK".

We need privatized money NOW. Also the proposal at "Jekyll" Island which is somehat a myth never was made law, this pile of crap is a democrat instutued party line vote hell.

[proferic]

blah, blah, blah (whackjob) blah, blah

[theairboater]

poisenberry,you are a leatherneck.victor 2 cut 1,only some roads are paid from taxes.Private roads and schools are much more efficiant.

[XsteelrogueX]

wake up or suffer the consequences, do not just bite the hand that feeds, drag the man who feeds to your pit and show him the wrath of the thinking, educated person that we really all are....wake the fuck up and STAND FOR WHAT WE ARE OWED

[NYJared04]

So how do I get my money back from the Federal Income Tax?

[proferic]

File for a refund for any overpayment you made on your return.

[ufascistpig]

poisen berry , you are the poisen you brainwashed phuck, there is no LAW, but you can squat to piss and get raped by the hand that feeds you, i am armed, free and noone decides my fate but me, i obey gods laws, we are organized, millions think like me, but the weak think like you. you would suck cock if the law said so

[poisenbery]

*poisenbery

and

*poison

[frank12379able]

@RetSquid title 26 was never acted into positive law. That means it is a special law.....for special people. Those people are 1) fed employees and 2) U S citizen's.......not sovereign citizens

[RetSquid]

@frank12379able

Incorrect, Title 26 as a whole was not passed as positive law, however EVERYTHING IN Iitle 26 HAS been passed and IS positive law.

Positive/non-positive law has nothing to do with "special people". And if you were born in any of the States, you ARE a "U.S. Citizen".

[proferic]

You are a whackjob!!!

[poisenbery]

us code title 26

there's your law you hippies >_>

[ufascistpig]

poisen berry u are poisen you brainwashed phuck, there is no LAW, but you can squat to piss and get raped by the hand sworn to protect you, i am armed, free, and no one decides my fate but me, i only obey gods laws, we are organizing, millions think like me, but the weak think like you

[frank12379able]

@poisenbery 26 wasn't turned into positive law.

[LastTrueLiberal]

The video implies that the income tax would somehow be ok if it were only constitutional and there was a law on the books. Not only is that a disgusting amoral argument, but it is a terrible one.

[TheRedMenace92]

The income tax is optional. It is unconstitutional to FORCE people to pay income taxes. But you have the right to pay it. I do because I believe in paying it because I do want to fund public schools, public roads, the post office, health care, welfare, etc. Those are all good things. Toll roads aren't going to work. The entire thing doesn't go to the Federal Reserve but I realize a portion does. I want it to help the poor able to go o school, get a life saving operation, live so I pay it.

[RetSquid]

To the extent that income taxes are said to be "voluntary," however, they are only voluntary in that one files the returns and pays the taxes without the IRS first telling each individual the amount due and then forcing payment of that amount. The payment of income taxes is not optional, however, see, e.g., Wilcox v. Commissioner, 848 F.2d 1007, 1008 (9th Cir. 1988); Newman v. Schiff, 778 F.2d 460, 467 (8th Cir. 1985)

[victor2cutube]

roads are paid for by the gas tax schools are paid for by the property taxes

[fjfjvmvm]

The idea that the clown who created this video knows what the terms "direct" and "apportioned" mean in the context of the Constitution is ludicrous. Obviously "direct" qualifies "taxes" in Art. 1, meaning that only "direct" taxes which are [un]"apportioned" are barred. Every tax is "direct" in the everyday 21st century use of the term. So that clearly can't be the meaning intended. Courts have ruled (rightly) that this term of art means (in essense) taxes on accumulated wealth.

[Chekat1009]

Well since you are on the speaking of dumb side fjfjvmvm, I wanted to say this....we have several laws in place now, that were passed without the Congress's approval that will take away our freedoms once they call Marshall Law...and mark my words....they will soon call Marshall Law. When that happens all control of money systems, banking, food, transportation, highway systems, and communication systems will be in the government control. Good-by freedoms!

[RetSquid]

Name a law that was passed without Congress.

By the way, it's spelled 'Martial' law.

[fjfjvmvm]

Administrative regulations and executive orders are just some of the types of laws that are not explicitly passed by Congress. The Supreme Court has routinely upheld Congress power to delegate its authority to regulate to administrative agencies. This gives Congress the power to (for instance) delegate to the EPA the authority to ban certain chemicals in pursuit of a broader goal of creating a cleaner environment. Congress would be totally incapable creating all necessary regulations.

[fjfjvmvm]

Marshall law would be some type of law association with a someone named Marshall. Marital law would be rule by the military because "martial" means "relating to the military."

So much for your contention that I'm "on the speaking of dumb side."

[fjfjvmvm]

I'm all for criticizing the bankers but this is so dumb it is beyond comprehension. The internal revenue code (Title 28 I believe) has section after section imposing income tax. Further every court in the US accepts the validity of 16th amendment. More to the point income taxes were absolutely never considered "direct."

Taxes are necessary for government which is in turn necessary for your sacred property "rights." Only petulant, retarded children refuse to recognize this.

[gfunksound]

Even if the IRS cites the internal revenue code for why you have to pay income tax ( them citing their own code what bullshit ) the internal revenue code

NEVER DEFINES WHAT "INCOME" IS.

They just say over and over again that you have to pay taxes on it. Well if you never define what income is specifically, it follows logically that one cannot pay taxes on something insubstantial.

Income is actually defined as profit from corporate activity in Stratton's Independence V Howbert. Look it up

[fjfjvmvm]

The Internal Revenue Code is CODE - meaning passed by Congress. It is not administrative law (which is constitutional in any event) so you're doubly wrong there. It also demonstrates that you lack basic civic knowledge and everyone should disregard what you have to say about governmental matters.

Of course, the Code does define the relevant terms. Look up Sec. 61, 643(b) and the corresponding regulations for more in depth explication.

[RetSquid]

the Court stated that income is the gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined. Eisner v. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920)

Compensation for labor or services, paid in the form of wages or salary, has been universally held by the courts of this republic to be income, subject to the income tax laws currently... United States v. Romero, 640 F.2d 1014, 1016 (9th Cir. 1981).

[RetSquid]

TITLE 26 > Subtitle A > CHAPTER 1 > Subchapter B > PART I >

§ 63. Taxable income defined

(a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (b), for purposes of this subtitle, the term taxable income means gross income minus the deductions allowed by this chapter (other than the standard deduction).

[RetSquid]

watch?v=Nuc53aBm8hw&

[Wadizell]

In other words the federal reserve system was a caged animal that the government just sprung loose and let destroy our great nation.Watch the whole film of Zeitgeist you fucking idiot..you might learn more than just spelling and grammar.

[Wadizell]

Mox531...you should be sorry for your stupidity. the federal income tax was pushed through congress just to make it LEGAL for the federal reserve bank to regulate it to the American people. The federal reserve bank is a private corporation with NO regulation or control by the US government or Congress, it makes its own rules and the income tax is in their soul control...no body else can control it.

[anothervanmeter]

Fair Trial for Elaine and Ed Brown! Free their Supporters!

[MoX531]

I'm sorry for my poor spelling/Grammar

[MoX531]

16th AMMENDMENT IDIOTS!!!! The 16th ammendmentgives congress the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes from whaterver souce derived without apportionment!!!!!!!!!! So Zeitgeist is wrong it IT IS CONSTITUTIONAL!

[ZeroLives07]

You didn't watch the video did you?

@32 seconds he say "the required number of states in order to ratify the amendment to allow the income tax was never met and even been sighted in modern court cases" AKA the 16th amendment isn't part of the constitution.

[Leathal752]

True.

[RetSquid]

Secretary Knox declared that enough states had ratified the sixteenth amendment. The Secretary' decision is not transparently defective. We need not decide when, if ever, such a decision may be reviewed in order to know that Secretary Knox' decision is now beyond review."

U.S. v. Thomas, 788 F.2d 1250 (7th Cir. 1986), cert. den. 107 S.Ct. 187 (1986).

[SundaysAndCybele]

@ZeroLives07

42 out of the then 48 states ratified the 16th amendment. Only 36 were needed.

[Brianexe43]

The 16th ammendment is a little fishy... i don't know what to belive right now i am researching it alot... but think about the american revolution was based on them taxing us to much do you think they would escape that then write it in the constitution?

[ZeroLives07]

I have also been researching it. I was once told by someone this "Yeah, i believe the 16th amend is bull, but you have to remember that they have 12 guys sitting around doing nothing. If you don't pay, it'll give 12 guys something to do. You can't fight it alone."

I think our government is corrupt beyond political repair. I smell a revolution.

[fjfjvmvm]

Prior to the enactment of the US Constitution the governing charter of the US (the Articles of Confederation) was deemed by commercial interest to provide insufficient power to the federal government to protect their interests, property rights, etc. This led to the movement to supplant the weak central government system of Articles with a more powerful central gov. with the power to enact taxes. The result was the Constitution including Art. 1 sec. 1 paragraph 3 granting congress taxing power.

[fjfjvmvm]

The only limitation was that "direct" taxes were required to be "apportioned" (a term which means that the proportion of a tax raised by the population of a state must correspond to the proportion of that state's population to the country's population as a whole.)

"Direct" in a contemporary, everyday sense would entail all taxes. Courts have always understood that to be an absurd reading; because the framers wouldn't have created a power that could never be exercised.

[fjfjvmvm]

Rather courts have looked at history and decided the term of art "direct" meant roughly - tax on accumulated wealth rather than income. The 16th amendment was passed in response the Supreme Court (in the Pollock case of 1895) reversing its own precedent so as to widen the definition of "direct" to include certain income derived by accumulated wealth. This is irrelevant to income taxes and all courts agree the 16th is valid. But the 16th is not needed to made income taxes constitutional.

[kaysandesses]

OH look, it's Sherry Peel Jackson who is just about to get her ass handed to her on a platter by the DOJ for lying about income tax. Woo hoo!!!

[PhillipOrion]

why would you root against Sherry?

[pisces3450]

The last thing I want to do is support the "System", but just check out Wikipedia's commentary on "income taxes" and protesters. It seems a lot of well intentioned challengers have been legally shot down in the courts.

(Time for a revolution!)

[Uberware]

Ask IRS to show the law that makes the income tax legal. They cant. Its a big scam. Check it out for yourself.

[kaysandesses]

"Check it out for yourself. "

You obviously haven't. The laws are all in Title 26 of the U.S. Code.

[extremeconspiracycom]

learn how, rickdice dotcom

[fliggahj]

so we can stop paying and nothing will happen?

[revolutionary530]

Good work!The Federal income tax is a fraud!!!!!!!!learn the truth

HumboldtTruth.c o m