@gacwalker The first stage included the boosters are using only liquid propellant, means kerosene and LOX. Not as the Space Shuttle Boosters, what used with its boosters solid fuel.
@gacwalker other thing to mention here is that they really need less energy to go up since the Soyuz orbiter is around 7000kg vs Shuttle orbiter (empty) is 68,585 kg. the cargo can hold 109,000 kg so you need something else to push up to space.
"Soyuz" is considered the most reliable rocket in the world. The problem may be only because of non-compliance with quality control during the assembly of components for rocket.
@HNDNV07 That is not easy to answer in total. Since 2001 the Russians using for their Soyuz liftoff (Soyuz Spacecraft and Progress Cargo Spacecraft) the "Soyuz FG". You will find answers here: en[dot]wikipedia[dot]org/wiki/Soyuz-FG
@goatboycasto Haha. They do not control the flight with this stick. The flight is full automatic and will guide them in 8 minutes to orbit. That would be a hard mission to steer a rocket with a flightstick. ;)
СССР е причината на запад да се отнасят човешки към лордовете, и не точно СССР а чисто човешкото разбиране на хората населяващи тея географски ширини.
@gxlxn Russian rockets uses liquid fuel (Kerosene & LOX). The boosters of the space shuttle were using solid rocket fuel. That produces more smoke. The main engine of the Space Shuttle used liquid hydrogene and oxygene.
@gxlxn The launch pad of the space shuttle got flooded with water to cool it down during the start. This also contributed a lot the the cloud-developement. (Next to the fuel.)
@Rubashow That´s interesting theory but Space Shuttle was leaving a smoke trail to the edge of the atmosphere. And that fact has nothing to do with water cooling.
@Rubashow L'acqua non serve a raffreddare,ma bensì ad attutire il rombo,le vibrazioni dei propulsori.Nello shuttle il raffreddamento degli ugelli e preposto a delle serpentine intorno dove circola azoto.
21:104 The Day when We will fold the heaven like the folding of a [written] sheet for the records. As We began the first creation, We will repeat it. [That is] a promise binding upon Us. Indeed, We will do it.
21:30 Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and? made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?
46:3 We did not create the? heavens? and? earth and what is between them except in truth and [for] a specified term.But those who disbelieve, from that of which they are warned, are turning away.
51:47 And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.
QURAN 55:5 The sun and the moon[move] by precise calculation
35:13 He causes the night to enter the day, and? He causes the day to enter the night and has subjected the sun and the moon - each running [its course] for a specified term. That is Allah, your Lord; to Him belongs sovereignty. And those whom you invoke other than Him do not possess [as much as] the membrane of a date seed
25:61 Blessed is He who has placed in the sky great stars and placed therein a [burning]lamp and luminous moon
QURAN 55:5 The sun and the moon[move] by precise calculation
35:13 He causes the night to enter the day, and? He causes the day to enter the night and has subjected the sun and the moon - each running [its course] for a specified term. That is Allah, your Lord; to Him belongs sovereignty. And those whom you invoke other than Him do not possess [as much as] the membrane of a date seed
25:61 Blessed is He who has placed in the sky great stars and placed therein a [burning]lamp and luminous moon
Pirates of the Caribbean? LOL. I remember the first place I ever heard of Baikonur 6 Years ago... the video game Command and Conquer. Terrorists take over the facility and swap in a biological warhead and refit the rocket. Little did I know nearly everything in the video game was real. Baikonur Cosmodrome, Soyuz, hell even Topals
@uAzil14 The United states is no longer building rockets...they have halted on the space program. So much debt owed. China and Russia are taking the Lead. Japan can also launch their own rocket to the ISS. The European Union too.
<3 Here is an American sending Russia love for your space program. It was our rivalry that brought us this far. Now we are teammates! It is so beautiful... the launch gave me chills.
@joot78 this is a path of peace, it will be long to achieve it completely, but I hope someday humans will set its differences apart and reach towards the final frontier together. Well I just hope it will be in my lifetime, even if it is a long shot.
@joot78 My dear American friend, I am also glad that we are in one team. But look, since we're on the same team humanity so and marking time, there is no large and great breakthroughs. Today your enemies are stupid arabs, and we are the same stupid caucasians. They were up to our technologies is even 300 years(if they are the grass will not smoke), and if all will be 700. Our great nations need a worthy opponent, and then will be the development of mankind.
One of the greatest thing Im ever seen, Sergey Pavlovich Korolyov is a brilliant rocket designer with Valentin Petrovich Glushko supply for the engine. You both were the BEST!!!!
@Letos0 actualy the shuttle's engines are like the Russian engines...the only ones that smoke are the solid rocket boosters...the Shuttle engines run at take off and dont smoke only the boosters
@onefugowie The soyus rocket uses RP-1 (highly refined kerosene) and LOX (Liquid Oygen) as oxidizer for its engines (at least in the first stage) , that is a liquid combination. It is the two solid rocket boosters on the shuttle that produces that long plume of fire etc during launch. The SRB´s use solid propellant (once it´s ignited, you can´t shut it off) .. Solid propellant burns differently in the atmosphere compared to liquid fuel...
All russian rocket models come with exhaust catalyser.
Seriously no, lol, the Soyuz uses liquid fueled rocket engines, that means both fuel and oxidizer are liquids, the space shuttle also has these, but only IN the shuttle, the booster rocket engines are of solid fuel.
@SEL9000 Is he retarded? He looks like it. Did they spend millions of taxpayers money sending his waving ass to space? ISS is waste of money.. Russia did more with MIR.
Awesome video. I really enjoyed watching. It is the first time that I see a launch from baykonur. Must admit it sent massive shivers down my spine. I always thought the Russian technology and design was the best. And after having seen this video, I found it even more
Watching this makes you think about how big an achievement space travel was and how scared people must've been of Sputnik.
The Soviet Union "beat" the United States... For once they seemed to have the technological edge. Capitalism, for all its innovations and claims of competition was supposedly trumped in a quite embarrassing fashion: Russians had not only reached space but could, in theory, spy on them from there.
Don't be so serious, it was only vague statement. I meaned that shuttles has to be cheap and functional and they proved to be dangerous and expensive. Assumption was very different from reality. Don't comapre USA and UK army achievements cos case is money. USA can afford to spend 800 billions $ per year where UK spend about 100. BTW im not brit but Polish we spend 13 billions $ for "army" Our biggest achievements are 52 F16 which we bought from usa last years. peace
@drdeathkwp dream on idiot...russian space programme is beyond anything nasa ever did....soyuz still kicking ass and nasa haha if it wasnt for the russians ....no space station
Russian rocket engines are also a masterpieces. Much better than Amerikan. For every one who wants to know something about superior russian rockets watch the video :2001 Equinox : The Engines that came in from the Cold at watch?v=3dBjqbkOsv4
I use to make models of rockets when I was a kid, and I say that R7 and a Soyuz are such beautiful peaces of work. After more than 50 years it is still operational, and still flies with such reliability. Sergey Korolyov would be proud!
The first reliable system for space flight. Everytime i see a Soyuz take off i get goosebumps , like a well choreographed show the umbillical tower moves away right before it rises i´ts beautiful !!
In case anyone is wondering why the rocket appears to be spewing out steam, it's because it uses cryogenic fuels. The fuels are at several hundred degrees below zero.
As long as it isn't an ICBM, IT IS a beautiful thing. Hell, you even have to admire the cold-war ICBM systems - after all, if not for the so-called "cold" war, not one of us would have this technology, let alone collectively.
You have to have respect for the Russian Federation as a first-nation entity for these accomplishments; I don't care what anyone here or anywhere else says to the contrary.
@renegatt Shitty yank shuttles? And what have you Brits done as far as space travel is concerned? Oh, that's right.....NOTHING!!! And come to think of it, thanks to Labour and now with the Tories, the "Mighty British Navy" is down to 24 ships and no aircraft carriers. Before you criticize another country's achievements, look at your country first. Maybe you wouldn't be so quick to criticize others then.
even there space program is... "Russian" like comon it's in the middle of nowhere with nothing that soyuz launches, nasa it's Florida cape Canaveral on the beach with palm trees...
@SEL9000 Gagarin even better said, I just remembered inaccurately. Now I looked in google
"He showed us how steep road to space ... We will teach you to fly the Union." In this I see is our duty to Volodya. This is an excellent, intelligent ship. He will fly ... "
@CamiloSanchez1979: The shuttle's Solid Rocket Boosters use Ammonium Perchlorate, a solid propellant, which leaves a thick smoke trail from the solid particles of the propellant hanging around in the air. The Soyuz uses liquid fuels, which evaporate in the intense heat from the combustion chamber. This leaves a mostly invisible gas trail, although the Kerosene fuel leaves a thin, black smoke (it's hard to see on the Soyuz, but easier on the Saturn V's which uses the same fuel but burns more).
Because US developed the Space Shuttle and they do not want to stay in the second row. Buran was closed in 1992 because of no money on the accounts. The Buran (by the way its the russian word for Winterstorm) was carried by the famous Energia Rocket, and this Rocket is beside the Saturn V Rocket one of the biggest heavy lifter rockets on planet Earth.
@bambang303378 To tell the world - "We can do better shuttles, then even americen's can do." Buran was mutch better roken then Spase Shuttle is. In all way, include gass ecological compatibility, safety and cheapness of the project. Buran do something that SS can not do ever - he landed without pilot on board.
@bambang303378 Pressure to copy the Americans -- a rather pointless exercise. Frankly, America would be better off if they just kept and gradually improved the Apollo/Saturn-1B duo like the Russians did with the Soyuz.
I was talking with a Russian electronics engineer yesterday who worked in the Soviet areospace industry before 1991. He reckoned the Russians built the Buran to lift 100 tonnes into orbit & the reason for this was to build an orbital launch platform for a manned mission to Mars. In some ways the fall of the USSR also meant the fall of two different world ideologies competing for dominance thus rapid evolution of space technology.
@bambang303378 The Buran system will be far more flexible, able to launch anything from low-orbit, low mass payloads, up to truly massive, high-orbit lift-offs. It will also be more economic. As good as the Soyuz is, and it is very good, it is also very old, developed in a different age.
Even if it has been modernized many times, it's like asking: Why phase out the AK47 in favour of the AK-74? Because the AK-74 kept all that was good about the AK-47, but integrated in a more modern concept.
It's quite simple - The Buran was a military project, it was intended to deliver nuclear warheads. The hull (the Buran, but with wings jettisoned) would dock to a battle space station and wait for them to be needed. The project was cancelled as SSSR decided it might not be worth spending money on when they already had MIRV ICBMs, I guess..
@legohelicopter Weird, considering that the Soviets were the first to deploy ICBMs back in the '50s, and Buran is a 1970 project... Also, the wings aren't jettisonable. Do you have a source to share?
Russia's rocketry stands the test of time over decades...a testament to the mastery of engineering principles, and renown metallurgical wizardry recognized the world over! One can only dream what the amazing Russians will develop next.
looks like red alert
legofanguyvid 4 weeks ago
Music pls <3
DelijaCoja 1 month ago
so how come the rockets dont blast out a monster smoke trail like the US shuttle rockets do?
gacwalker 1 month ago
@gacwalker The first stage included the boosters are using only liquid propellant, means kerosene and LOX. Not as the Space Shuttle Boosters, what used with its boosters solid fuel.
SEL9000 1 month ago
@SEL9000 How are they going to get back to eath? They used a rocket, rockets don't have weals to land. So how are they going to do it?
Thetrutv 1 month ago
@Thetrutv Try searching here on YouTube "Soyuz Landing" and you will see it. ;)
SEL9000 1 month ago
@gacwalker other thing to mention here is that they really need less energy to go up since the Soyuz orbiter is around 7000kg vs Shuttle orbiter (empty) is 68,585 kg. the cargo can hold 109,000 kg so you need something else to push up to space.
Sahllem 2 weeks ago
so awesome, and the music fits so well, altho I can't put my finger on where its from.
From the movie "crimson tide"?
HeeroYuy911 1 month ago
@HeeroYuy911 Right. Its from "Crimson Tide".
SEL9000 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Wow! This video more than 5 years.
"Soyuz" is considered the most reliable rocket in the world. The problem may be only because of non-compliance with quality control during the assembly of components for rocket.
MrSrgj 2 months ago
@MrSrgj Yes. Thats might be the problem. Or some people are feeling to safe and to much routines what is not inspected.
SEL9000 2 months ago
How many engines/motors are on the Soyuz? And how much thrust does this vehicle put out? Thank you!
HNDNV07 2 months ago
@HNDNV07 That is not easy to answer in total. Since 2001 the Russians using for their Soyuz liftoff (Soyuz Spacecraft and Progress Cargo Spacecraft) the "Soyuz FG". You will find answers here: en[dot]wikipedia[dot]org/wiki/Soyuz-FG
SEL9000 2 months ago
So what happens if he drops the stick?? do they crash?? hard to believe they use a stick to control the craft during launch...
goatboycasto 2 months ago
@goatboycasto Haha. They do not control the flight with this stick. The flight is full automatic and will guide them in 8 minutes to orbit. That would be a hard mission to steer a rocket with a flightstick. ;)
SEL9000 2 months ago
,,Here we go"said Yuri Gagarin
igor7702 3 months ago
: )
MrKontre 4 months ago
СССР е причината на запад да се отнасят човешки към лордовете, и не точно СССР а чисто човешкото разбиране на хората населяващи тея географски ширини.
grozd102 4 months ago
mankind sure does a lot of bad things....but every now and then we make a few good ones, this surely is among the best
PS: what's the name of that music?
frizzon 4 months ago
Russian rockets doesn´t produce clouds of smoke as American vehicles. What is the reason?
gxlxn 4 months ago
@gxlxn Russian rockets uses liquid fuel (Kerosene & LOX). The boosters of the space shuttle were using solid rocket fuel. That produces more smoke. The main engine of the Space Shuttle used liquid hydrogene and oxygene.
SEL9000 4 months ago 5
Comment removed
milosnikolin 4 months ago
Respond to this video... what is this music 1 50
milosnikolin 4 months ago
@gxlxn The launch pad of the space shuttle got flooded with water to cool it down during the start. This also contributed a lot the the cloud-developement. (Next to the fuel.)
Rubashow 4 months ago
@Rubashow That´s interesting theory but Space Shuttle was leaving a smoke trail to the edge of the atmosphere. And that fact has nothing to do with water cooling.
gxlxn 4 months ago
@gxlxn I know. Thats why I mentioned the fuel.
Rubashow 4 months ago
@Rubashow L'acqua non serve a raffreddare,ma bensì ad attutire il rombo,le vibrazioni dei propulsori.Nello shuttle il raffreddamento degli ugelli e preposto a delle serpentine intorno dove circola azoto.
vansecondomarco 2 months ago
@vansecondomarco I'm pretty sure what you just wrote is useful but I am not able to understand a word of it. Btw: Italian?
Rubashow 2 months ago
@Rubashow Si Italiano.Ciao.
vansecondomarco 2 months ago
Grinning like the Cheshire Cat, and I’d be smiling too for that view.
centurion180ad 4 months ago
21:104 The Day when We will fold the heaven like the folding of a [written] sheet for the records. As We began the first creation, We will repeat it. [That is] a promise binding upon Us. Indeed, We will do it.
tamerakk 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BIG BANG - SPACE in Quran:
21:30 Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and? made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe?
46:3 We did not create the? heavens? and? earth and what is between them except in truth and [for] a specified term.But those who disbelieve, from that of which they are warned, are turning away.
51:47 And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander.
tamerakk 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
QURAN 55:5 The sun and the moon[move] by precise calculation
35:13 He causes the night to enter the day, and? He causes the day to enter the night and has subjected the sun and the moon - each running [its course] for a specified term. That is Allah, your Lord; to Him belongs sovereignty. And those whom you invoke other than Him do not possess [as much as] the membrane of a date seed
25:61 Blessed is He who has placed in the sky great stars and placed therein a [burning]lamp and luminous moon
tamerakk 4 months ago
QURAN 55:5 The sun and the moon[move] by precise calculation
35:13 He causes the night to enter the day, and? He causes the day to enter the night and has subjected the sun and the moon - each running [its course] for a specified term. That is Allah, your Lord; to Him belongs sovereignty. And those whom you invoke other than Him do not possess [as much as] the membrane of a date seed
25:61 Blessed is He who has placed in the sky great stars and placed therein a [burning]lamp and luminous moon
tamerakk 4 months ago
QURAN 14:33 And He subjected for you the sun and the moon,continuous[in orbit],and subjected for you the night and the day.
21:33 And it is He who created the night and the day and the sun and the moon;all [heavenly bodies] in an orbit are swimming.
36:38 And the sun? runs [on course] toward its stopping point. That is the determination of the Exalted in Might, the Knowing.
36:39 And the moon - We have determined for it phases, until it returns [appearing] like the old date stalk.
tamerakk 4 months ago
deve essere comodo stare li dentro
254lele 5 months ago
Sergei Korolev can be proud of himself...
Tonin41992 5 months ago 13
@Tonin41992
Korolev is my hero.
EmceeViolent 1 month ago
the musci is not really appropriate, leave the natural sound
schassse 6 months ago
wow - 1500 spacecraft launched from there, while NASA could after Apollo, which was only a few, manage only 135 flights and then they had to give up.
oomblikkies 6 months ago
RUSIAN NOMBER 1
16privileg 6 months ago
No soy ni norteamericano ni ruso, soy un amante del espacio. Esto es grandioso!!!
PD Soy Argentino
profegerar 6 months ago
Pirates of the Caribbean? LOL. I remember the first place I ever heard of Baikonur 6 Years ago... the video game Command and Conquer. Terrorists take over the facility and swap in a biological warhead and refit the rocket. Little did I know nearly everything in the video game was real. Baikonur Cosmodrome, Soyuz, hell even Topals
DarkestofTimes 6 months ago
beautiful in every aspect.
ThomasHaberkorn 6 months ago
Music makes this look epic!
JekaZMD 6 months ago
blew it up with valkrie rocket
takeoff108 6 months ago
I would be scared lol seriously im afraid of heights and getting lost in space lol gotta stop watching movies
jezza1789 6 months ago
its about time astronauts became cosmonauts :P
mist8k 7 months ago
yum
jhx1994 7 months ago
viva koroliov !!! que grande eres
ferchopar 7 months ago
This piece of rocket is our last hope to go to space...we're doomed
CamiloSanchez1979 7 months ago
Amazing how clean the liquid rockets burn compared to solid fuel.
drbackjack 8 months ago
space shuttle has retired...!!
uAzil14 8 months ago
@uAzil14 The United states is no longer building rockets...they have halted on the space program. So much debt owed. China and Russia are taking the Lead. Japan can also launch their own rocket to the ISS. The European Union too.
RobertsDigital 7 months ago
<3 Here is an American sending Russia love for your space program. It was our rivalry that brought us this far. Now we are teammates! It is so beautiful... the launch gave me chills.
joot78 8 months ago 25
@joot78 this is a path of peace, it will be long to achieve it completely, but I hope someday humans will set its differences apart and reach towards the final frontier together. Well I just hope it will be in my lifetime, even if it is a long shot.
koushinproductions 7 months ago
@joot78 My dear American friend, I am also glad that we are in one team. But look, since we're on the same team humanity so and marking time, there is no large and great breakthroughs. Today your enemies are stupid arabs, and we are the same stupid caucasians. They were up to our technologies is even 300 years(if they are the grass will not smoke), and if all will be 700. Our great nations need a worthy opponent, and then will be the development of mankind.
Piranoga 6 months ago
The Soyuz really is an amazing spacecraft. As we here in the States would say, she's 'ol reliable.
randomwords7007 8 months ago
One of the greatest thing Im ever seen, Sergey Pavlovich Korolyov is a brilliant rocket designer with Valentin Petrovich Glushko supply for the engine. You both were the BEST!!!!
CF6PW4000RB211 8 months ago
It's so amazing to think what we can do. I mean launching a metal object off the planet with people in it and getting them back down safely :P
raccoonmatinginyour 8 months ago
Hahaha, is that some Mechwarrior music in the background? epic.
Renegen1 9 months ago
How are you so close? Nasa doesn't let anyone within a mile for the space shuttle!
CrazyPotatos 9 months ago
3:38 really FANTASTIC!!!!!! it's wonderful
austinpower81 9 months ago
how come it does not leave a big cloud all the way up like the shuttle pretty clean take off
onefugowie 9 months ago
@onefugowie
Better technology
Letos0 9 months ago
@Letos0 actualy the shuttle's engines are like the Russian engines...the only ones that smoke are the solid rocket boosters...the Shuttle engines run at take off and dont smoke only the boosters
onefugowie 9 months ago
@onefugowie The soyus rocket uses RP-1 (highly refined kerosene) and LOX (Liquid Oygen) as oxidizer for its engines (at least in the first stage) , that is a liquid combination. It is the two solid rocket boosters on the shuttle that produces that long plume of fire etc during launch. The SRB´s use solid propellant (once it´s ignited, you can´t shut it off) .. Solid propellant burns differently in the atmosphere compared to liquid fuel...
RickyboyH 8 months ago
@onefugowie
All russian rocket models come with exhaust catalyser.
Seriously no, lol, the Soyuz uses liquid fueled rocket engines, that means both fuel and oxidizer are liquids, the space shuttle also has these, but only IN the shuttle, the booster rocket engines are of solid fuel.
SKarmytech 8 months ago
What song is used in this video?
storm92jk 9 months ago
Gorgeous USSR rocket
GravityPowerful 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
':SITE',:HAS'.FREE.:,IPAD:,:2.:OFFERS.,'
ＷＷＷ.ＩＰＡＤ２ＸＣＯＭＰＬＥＴＥＬＹＦＲＥＥ．ＴＫ
COPY SITE & PASTE
vastrevenue74Ad 10 months ago
To the right of the window there is an american astronaut.
MrSrgj 10 months ago
@MrSrgj This is Mike Fincke - It is the liftoff of Soyuz TMA-4 - Padalka (RUS) /Kuipers (NL)/Fincke (USA) - April 19, 2004
SEL9000 10 months ago 2
@SEL9000 Is he retarded? He looks like it. Did they spend millions of taxpayers money sending his waving ass to space? ISS is waste of money.. Russia did more with MIR.
LongBow1600 4 months ago
hoax
zippy476 10 months ago
I wonder how hot that flame is coming out the back, Does anybody know
honeybunchickens 10 months ago
The Rock Theme <3
TheJazz747 10 months ago
@TheJazz747 It's the Crimson Tide theme.
C1v1cDr1v3r 10 months ago
@C1v1cDr1v3r Oh crap, you're right. They sound so alike to me :D my mistake :)
TheJazz747 10 months ago
I like what he uses to press the buttons. "dude I can't reach the buttons." "just use this stick man"
szester 11 months ago
russia 4ever
ricibiribicci 11 months ago 3
We, Russian, closely on this planet. We will develop and continue space exploration.
AWtify 11 months ago
Awesome video. I really enjoyed watching. It is the first time that I see a launch from baykonur. Must admit it sent massive shivers down my spine. I always thought the Russian technology and design was the best. And after having seen this video, I found it even more
Thanks for posting.
Greetings from Denmark.
Henrik227 11 months ago 2
Beautiful ship
Bigredgumball 11 months ago
The Russians are the true masters of rocket technology.
kzbxvz 11 months ago
WOW!! that was way coolest launch ever
glennirish 1 year ago
Watching this makes you think about how big an achievement space travel was and how scared people must've been of Sputnik.
The Soviet Union "beat" the United States... For once they seemed to have the technological edge. Capitalism, for all its innovations and claims of competition was supposedly trumped in a quite embarrassing fashion: Russians had not only reached space but could, in theory, spy on them from there.
Quite chilling.
Henners1991 1 year ago
i dont know why but the pure awesomeness of this chills me to the bone.
estebee 1 year ago
Tell the music name plz
it's epic!
kibabiba 1 year ago
Don't be so serious, it was only vague statement. I meaned that shuttles has to be cheap and functional and they proved to be dangerous and expensive. Assumption was very different from reality. Don't comapre USA and UK army achievements cos case is money. USA can afford to spend 800 billions $ per year where UK spend about 100. BTW im not brit but Polish we spend 13 billions $ for "army" Our biggest achievements are 52 F16 which we bought from usa last years. peace
renegatt 1 year ago
Soyuz es la mejor nave que nos dejo la carrera espacial , muchas gracias Serguel Korolev
ferchopar 1 year ago
The ISS workhorse.
i3ever 1 year ago
Lol guy kept waving at the camera
thatkid0000able 1 year ago
now nasa was first to moon, but russia was first to SPACE
astronauts have a higher on-duty fatality rate than cosmonauts
space shuttle is a shit plane, besides russia did build a replica (buran)
russian rockets are the best
kmav81 1 year ago
wow that is a miracle,,humans can do it anything
space wait us
justdoit999999999999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Soyuz is a good rocket ship. NASA is way more accomplished overall. But credit were credit is due. Soyuz is good.
drdeathkwp 1 year ago
Soyuz is a good rocket ship. NASA is way more accomplished overall. But credit were credit is due. Soyuz is good.
drdeathkwp 1 year ago
@drdeathkwp dream on idiot...russian space programme is beyond anything nasa ever did....soyuz still kicking ass and nasa haha if it wasnt for the russians ....no space station
alkira001 1 year ago
@alkira001 "The russian space program is beyond anything nasa ever did?" Interesting that you would say that.
drdeathkwp 1 year ago
Russian rocket engines are also a masterpieces. Much better than Amerikan. For every one who wants to know something about superior russian rockets watch the video :2001 Equinox : The Engines that came in from the Cold at watch?v=3dBjqbkOsv4
iskander982 1 year ago
I use to make models of rockets when I was a kid, and I say that R7 and a Soyuz are such beautiful peaces of work. After more than 50 years it is still operational, and still flies with such reliability. Sergey Korolyov would be proud!
iskander982 1 year ago
The first reliable system for space flight. Everytime i see a Soyuz take off i get goosebumps , like a well choreographed show the umbillical tower moves away right before it rises i´ts beautiful !!
McFlaff 1 year ago
Thanks for the Video
I hope to watch the Shuttle launch on Nov 1/10
heidebill 1 year ago
In case anyone is wondering why the rocket appears to be spewing out steam, it's because it uses cryogenic fuels. The fuels are at several hundred degrees below zero.
bombarderoazul 1 year ago
It's Baikonur, not Baykonur.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
really awesome man.i wish space travel gets cheap so i can go!!!!!!!!!!
tinkerbell6245 1 year ago
but spaceship is very unconfortable.all of them are squeed up .
tinkerbell6245 1 year ago
As long as it isn't an ICBM, IT IS a beautiful thing. Hell, you even have to admire the cold-war ICBM systems - after all, if not for the so-called "cold" war, not one of us would have this technology, let alone collectively.
You have to have respect for the Russian Federation as a first-nation entity for these accomplishments; I don't care what anyone here or anywhere else says to the contrary.
btristal 1 year ago
Those rockets are reliable. Much better solution that shitty and expensive yanks shuttles
renegatt 1 year ago
@renegatt The STS may have been a mistake; but so was the Buran. Absolutely beautiful mistakes, if such a thing can be said, however.
btristal 1 year ago
@renegatt Excuse me? Calling the STS shitty is just plain ignorance.
EpiDemic117 1 year ago
@renegatt Shitty yank shuttles? And what have you Brits done as far as space travel is concerned? Oh, that's right.....NOTHING!!! And come to think of it, thanks to Labour and now with the Tories, the "Mighty British Navy" is down to 24 ships and no aircraft carriers. Before you criticize another country's achievements, look at your country first. Maybe you wouldn't be so quick to criticize others then.
osallent 1 year ago
Поехали!!!
Piranoga 1 year ago
russians know how to build rockets :)
DRPadmologist 1 year ago 3
Socialist Rocket...
The Soyuz is the DMV of space travel... *giggle*
hegemonymony 1 year ago
even there space program is... "Russian" like comon it's in the middle of nowhere with nothing that soyuz launches, nasa it's Florida cape Canaveral on the beach with palm trees...
brandtaylor93 1 year ago
was any one on that?
chase1146 1 year ago
@chase1146 Of course. Why not? We are providing it since 2005
SEL9000 1 year ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
fake, its computer graphics
Nickmorama 1 year ago
отличное видео
MsAllegator 1 year ago 2
Brazil
dakarljunio 1 year ago
does that come with fries?
Struckgold 1 year ago
in remembrance to Juri Alexejewitsch Gagarin
gazakind 1 year ago
Gagarin's words after the death of Komarov: "Soyuz is a good ship, we'll teach him to fly."
aleks070777 1 year ago 11
@aleks070777: Great words! Never heared about this. Thanks a lot for posting.
SEL9000 1 year ago
@SEL9000 Gagarin even better said, I just remembered inaccurately. Now I looked in google
"He showed us how steep road to space ... We will teach you to fly the Union." In this I see is our duty to Volodya. This is an excellent, intelligent ship. He will fly ... "
aleks070777 1 year ago
@aleks070777 Love this man, such a great guy!
Malasawas 1 year ago
@aleks070777 Komarov went so that Gargarin would not have to. That's a friend.
bullmeecham 10 months ago
Why is it that Soyuz doesnt leave a trail like the Shuttle?
CamiloSanchez1979 1 year ago
@CamiloSanchez1979: The shuttle's Solid Rocket Boosters use Ammonium Perchlorate, a solid propellant, which leaves a thick smoke trail from the solid particles of the propellant hanging around in the air. The Soyuz uses liquid fuels, which evaporate in the intense heat from the combustion chamber. This leaves a mostly invisible gas trail, although the Kerosene fuel leaves a thin, black smoke (it's hard to see on the Soyuz, but easier on the Saturn V's which uses the same fuel but burns more).
Tyrannobeast 1 year ago
@Tyrannobeast thanks bro..
CamiloSanchez1979 1 year ago
wow they are going soooo fast, his pencil has stretched, just like einstein predicted...
daenumen 1 year ago
wow thats a clean burning rocket there. nothing compared to the smoke left behind apollo. and its hella fast too.
hotty198 1 year ago
Baykonur should be declared as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, this place is a solid proof of the will and the intelligence of the human beings.
Nice video!
bogoid 1 year ago 18
Whoever said Russian technology is obsolete?
IronManu77 1 year ago 2
The Russians just make the Gantry get the hell out of the way of the rocket don't they!
jizzmonger 1 year ago
Korolev's creations are timeless. They sustain the International space station today.
And lets not forget brought the first living being and man into space!
bsod4u2 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrDraplo 1 year ago
What Is that an alien air freshener hanging from their rear view mirror? LOL!
rsouthern 1 year ago
the music in the background, is that Russian National Anthem?
9906197439 1 year ago
:))))))))))) It's music theme from Crimson Tide by Hans Zimmer
MrDraplo 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrDraplo 1 year ago
Sergei Korolev, you genius.
crazypdj 1 year ago 66
Russian engineering, when they "get it" tey get it big time. This R-7 rocket is lot like AK-47 rifle. 50 years old design but still the best.
One thing I dont understand though, with this awesome R7 system, why soviet leaders wasting so much resource with Buran system?
bambang303378 2 years ago 31
Because US developed the Space Shuttle and they do not want to stay in the second row. Buran was closed in 1992 because of no money on the accounts. The Buran (by the way its the russian word for Winterstorm) was carried by the famous Energia Rocket, and this Rocket is beside the Saturn V Rocket one of the biggest heavy lifter rockets on planet Earth.
SEL9000 2 years ago 4
@bambang303378 For transfer nuclear bomb and attack from cosmos if it is agression to USSR.
TheTimurbest 1 year ago
@bambang303378 buran has been retired for years.
SpartanW98 1 year ago
@bambang303378 To tell the world - "We can do better shuttles, then even americen's can do." Buran was mutch better roken then Spase Shuttle is. In all way, include gass ecological compatibility, safety and cheapness of the project. Buran do something that SS can not do ever - he landed without pilot on board.
Gigagamer74 1 year ago
@bambang303378 Pressure to copy the Americans -- a rather pointless exercise. Frankly, America would be better off if they just kept and gradually improved the Apollo/Saturn-1B duo like the Russians did with the Soyuz.
Tokopol 1 year ago
Comment removed
ilkkavu 1 year ago
Comment removed
ilkkavu 1 year ago
@bambang303378
I was talking with a Russian electronics engineer yesterday who worked in the Soviet areospace industry before 1991. He reckoned the Russians built the Buran to lift 100 tonnes into orbit & the reason for this was to build an orbital launch platform for a manned mission to Mars. In some ways the fall of the USSR also meant the fall of two different world ideologies competing for dominance thus rapid evolution of space technology.
jump70 1 year ago
@bambang303378 The Buran system will be far more flexible, able to launch anything from low-orbit, low mass payloads, up to truly massive, high-orbit lift-offs. It will also be more economic. As good as the Soyuz is, and it is very good, it is also very old, developed in a different age.
Even if it has been modernized many times, it's like asking: Why phase out the AK47 in favour of the AK-74? Because the AK-74 kept all that was good about the AK-47, but integrated in a more modern concept.
LarS1963 11 months ago
@bambang303378 The problem with soyuz compared to a shuttle is you can't launch 7+ astronauts and huge chunks of a space station....
beegoodyy 9 months ago
@beegoodyy
for cargo we have proton. enjoy /watch?v=pmuw0YaRw04&feature=related
Russia2010 6 months ago
@bambang303378
It's quite simple - The Buran was a military project, it was intended to deliver nuclear warheads. The hull (the Buran, but with wings jettisoned) would dock to a battle space station and wait for them to be needed. The project was cancelled as SSSR decided it might not be worth spending money on when they already had MIRV ICBMs, I guess..
legohelicopter 9 months ago
@legohelicopter Weird, considering that the Soviets were the first to deploy ICBMs back in the '50s, and Buran is a 1970 project... Also, the wings aren't jettisonable. Do you have a source to share?
Silmacar 7 months ago
@Silmacar
It is all on the official Buran homepage, buran.ru
legohelicopter 7 months ago
I love this.
Us Russians will be using bit from the ISS to construct the first orbital shipyard and living station!!!!!!!
iman2341 2 years ago
Russians are dad in space things
jbali44 2 years ago 5
mothers......
lol
homermage09 1 year ago
Russia's rocketry stands the test of time over decades...a testament to the mastery of engineering principles, and renown metallurgical wizardry recognized the world over! One can only dream what the amazing Russians will develop next.
Ironoff 2 years ago 9
Comment removed
Ironoff 2 years ago
thats what i was gonna say. Theres almost no smoke from the rocket.
pacsum 2 years ago
STS rocket seems to produce less fumes & smoke on lift off than shuttle rockets
jojo19981997 2 years ago
Space Shuttle launch are so beatiful and awesome.. im sad that they're going to retire 'em
elzupelzu 2 years ago 4
@elzupelzu
yes, and replace it with that abortion of Apollo and STS. The Ares and Orion are the ugliest things ever conceived!
austenbosten 2 years ago
@austenbosten
Well i dont actually like the Ares and Orion either.. let's just say that theres nothing so awesome that the Shuttles.
elzupelzu 2 years ago
holy crap! I hope you had hearing protection...
damaged01 2 years ago
This is one of my favorite YouTubes, regardless of topic.
crazypdj 2 years ago
A beautiful pieace of engineering, I hope we are all use them for peace and space exploration.
BallieBallBunny 2 years ago 5
@BallieBallBunny
Yes, and I hate to see the Soyuz g