Added: 2 years ago
From: rosemaryvivianne
Views: 160,561
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (58)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So, miss rosemary whateverthefuck, if your "god" person apparently gave us these urges, we DID evolve with these parts and nerve endings, your bullshit overlord is a dick. A huge one.

  • This video title is correct however, the majority of the information in this video is false, HIVVideos should do a rebuttal to this video and the typical "Safe-Sex" mantra.

  • so u cant do it right? xD

  • Fail!

  • Please remove the mysic

  • This video is making my blood boil. I can tolerate Christian ignorance only to this point.

    I'm all for freedom of speech, but back when the Pope decided to tell an AIDS-ridden continent to stop using condoms, someone should have shot that stupid old fuck in the head.

  • I am an ELCA Lutheran from South Carolina. I play the piano and organ. Today (September 4), we sang a hymn, God, When Human Bonds Are Broken as our Hymn of the Day. Ditto for me as I filled in at a local Lutheran Church. It was written by Fred Kaan and set to the tune, MERTON, composed by William H. Monk, 1823-1899. It is #603 in Evangelical Lutheran Worship.

  • @mkl62 who gives a sh*t?

  • It it wasn't for that trashy music, one could even understand what she says.

  • HAHAHAHAHA thanks fool, made my day. especially love the electronic voice, it says sexually in a funny way.

    BTW just because your husband gave you an STI you dont need to take it out on others.

    Its because of people like you and those idiots who claim to be the voice of god like your pope - hes a nazi :) and those silly beliefs you cling to like a child to blanket that there is costant conflict. Try Ideas as they can change.

    We are all the voice of god. Even you foolish one.

  • The Catholic Church is not against family planning per se. She is against the immoral means or methods by which it is being implemented. And the end does not justify the means. Any family planning scheme that is premised on materialism and relativism is anti-God and anti-life. The prevention of conception through human intervention is a sin because it frustrates the will of God to create human life. Jeremiah 1:5 says that God knows a person even before conception.

  • Seriously? A study which proves condoms only kinda work? Well then, I'm glad I didn't have sex yet... especially when you consider that 1/4 of the adult population carries HIV and another 1/4 is probably harboring God-knows-what.

    I'm perfectly happy with my complete absence of any sexually transmitted disease. I wouldn't change that for 10 minutes in the sack any day.

    But then again, no man can resist temptation, and that which is 'of our nature' (like sex and violence) is almost unavoidable..

  • @CJbass420 Your not reading my posts are you. I said:

    "Thats right - hating a religion isnt racist. However, hating every beleiver of that religion is."

  • @idunnoabc i dont hate all religous people, i have freinds and family who religous, and even if i did, hating every beleiver is not racsist because theyre not a race!

  • @CJbass420 Thats right - hating a religion isnt racist. However, hating every beleiver of that religion is. (have another look back at your post before you call me an idiot)

    You talk in such generalising terms, you did in your first post, and you still are now. Christianity is not against condoms, the idea is ridiculous.

  • @CJbass420

    If you idiot Christians?

    Nice sweeping generalisation there, otherwise known as racism. Wise up you muppet, not one person is the same despite race, religion, color, or anything else. So if you need to direct your anger at someone, do it at one person and not a race of people.

    (this is stuff you learn when your 10, its very straight forward)

  • ►Safe Sex: Not even animals have "safe sex".

    Its for immoral heathens. For morally degraded fools. Whether condoms protect or not, any evil-doer can do a lot to cover up any sin.

  • @MosheLaw

    ' "safe sex." Its for immoral heathens '

    What is an immoral heathen? (seeing as morality is relative, i'd love to know)

    'For morally degraded fools'

    Based on what?

  • @idunnoabc

    "Morality is relative"? Only a fool thinks morality is relative. "Based on what"? First start with the basics. Have ever heard of a book called the Bible? Old and New Testament? Ever heard of that?

  • @MosheLaw

    Presumably you dont want me to answer your last question, so i wont. With regards you referencing me saying "Based on what?", i am looking directly for what you base your beleif on - as in, quote me. And yes, i do beleive morality is relative, one mans wrong is another mans right - the best each man can do is have a clean conciense with god.

    I personally (emphasis on personally) beleive that its dangerous to force people into beleiving something is RIGHT or WRONG.

  • @idunnoabc Are you into some modern age belief? What ever you believe in obviously not the God of either Christianity or Judaism. Who is this "god" you mention-- Nature? Universe? People's will? Who or what is it? My source is the Bible as I have referenced to. Are you looking for a verse? Is there a verse against cigarettes, marijana, or maybe coors light? I need your help as well to find that. Did not you hear: "It violates natural law". So I hope nature is not your god.

  • @MosheLaw I was questioning the idea of their being a "Law". Please tell me what law it is (other than that of the world) that you follow. What rules and regulations are you living by?

  • @idunnoabc : Christian based rules/regulation. With regard to this vid, the commandment is 'be fruitful and multiply". How do the use of condoms agree with this? Many(so called christians) make excuses that they cant afford to have kids, so they themselves violate this command. Gen 1:28

    Unbelievably!, Many so called christian parents give there so called christian daughter pills to keep from getting pregnant. The use is not as bad when married. But if not married then be hung or burned.

  • @MosheLaw Still havent answered my question, and its getting boring. What rules are you living by? SPECIFICALLY. Dont say "christianity" (hitler was a "christian"), presumably your living by the ten commandments? Law given to moses to preach to the Jews. Are you jewish?

  • @idunnoabc When I said Christian rules/regulations, whats so hard to understand about that? Hitler was no christian and only used it to justify his doings. And an observant jew just doesnt follow 10 commandments. It seems you have obscured your ownself in some modern age nonsense. Its weird enough that you hide your profile. I am a Christian. To list you all the commandments is silly. There are hundreds. Many from the Old and New testament. I'm running out of room now.

  • @idunnoabc: Continuing. I've never debated such a basic thing with anyone. Not even atheist! I wont quote all the rules. But once someone is a christian, they must obey all commands in NT and OT. The Apostles Creed wraps up the basics which says what the gospel is. The doctrine/rules I FOLLOW are the 10 commandments, Holy Communion, tithing, daily prayer, some meditation, fasting when needed, no secular attachment. The goal is a sin free lifestyle. I will post all this on my profile.

  • @MosheLaw Why is it weird that i hide my profile? Is that wrong too?

    You keep saying 'modern age', i dont really know what this means? This would suggest your living in an 'old age'?

  • @idunnoabc Sir/ma'am You can hide your profile. No big deal. Just seemed odd. But it seems your from the U.K.

    Yes its on old religion/philosophy. Unchanging. I decided I would post on my website and not my profile.

  • @MosheLaw

    Im going to leave this now - i'll read your reply just out of courtesy, but let me just say this:

    The impressions i've got from talking to you, are that you hate people whose opinions and actions differ from yours, i am a very watered down version of this - imagine if a fundamentalist athiest was in my place. I can presume that: me and you both beleive jesus is the son of god, and our saviour. Dont forget that, and dont stop loving your fellow man because he does differently to you.

  • @idunnoabc Why stop now. I wouldn't say I hate people whose opinion differs. But God hates them: "The foolish shall not stand in thy sight: thou hatest all workers of iniquity."

    But I will most likely disagree with their little self-made philosophy. I will emphatically show them they are wrong.

    Thats what every so called christian says: "I believe in Jesus". But unfortunately Jesus just doesnt believe in them. So theres a problem as they will know in hell.

    And burn well for it.

  • @MosheLaw Jesus loves everybody, no matter what. What planet are you on?

  • @idunnoabc

    Did you not read? Where did you learn to read at? Your channel does match you well: uhh? idunno a b c

  • Freedaaa, you are welcome!

  • @Freedaaa wats wrong with wat u sed yur right

  • Hey dyslexia!

    Your comment basically said, just because there are other ways to get an STD that means it's okay to use a condom because you could still get it anyway. At least that's what it looked like you were saying.

    Also, the scientific evidence that condoms are not really having all that much affect on preventing these STDs is present in this video.

    That scientific info doesn't even come from the Church but the National Institutes of Health. Which is definitely NOT a religious program.

  • But bocaj you missing the whole point of the video!!!!

    It's not about Teresa its about the truth behind the lie that sex can be safe.

    And when I mean safe I mean that their is no "risk" of having a baby or catching an STD.

    A baby shouldn't be looked upon as a "risk" and as for STDs just don't have sex out of marriage and then you should have no problem with this stuff.

  • "I think it is very beautiful for the poor to accept their lot, to share it with the passion of Christ. I think the world is being much helped by the suffering of the poor people."

    Bocaj, look beyond your own basic understanding of the English language and you would see that Mother Teresa was basically saying that the poor did not complain about their troubles though they were grievous.

    Indeed, the sacrifices and simple humility that were made by the poor help show the world their errors.

  • Wait a second....

    Are you seriously implying that Mother Teresa was the THE main cause of poverty, filth, and unsanitary conditions in India and Africa???

    Bocaj you are a complete MORON.

    And btw the floors were swept and all material was cleaned via boiling water just as you said it could be. They had to do it that way because THAT WAS ALL THEY HAD!!!!!

  • Oh, by the way Bojac, one of the primary sources of her volunteers was the people whom Mother Teresa had helped to regain their health.

    As her order grew so did the funds (from honest people) and eventually what Mother was doing gained the attention of the media and then even more funds came from all over the world. The result was even more hospices, schools, and help for those who had literally nothing.

  • As for other financial problems. Mother Teresa was fooled by criminals who tricked her into taking fraudulent money that was stolen so that it could be concealed from the authorities.

    Mother Teresa needed the money and although surprised at the volume of money which was given she didn't have the means to look and see how it was acquired.

    I suggest Bocaj that you look for other sources other than anti-Catholic ones.

  • As for the poor quality of the shelters; Mother Teresa's options were extremely limited in a country with 1 BILLION people.

    All buildings in the cities which weren't owned by wealthy people for their own business/personal use. Any other building was either uninhabitable or overrun by other sick and homeless people.

    So Mother Teresa procured the best she could with what she had and then relied on God's grace.

  • So since she had no support except for a little money from the Church and a small group of volunteers, she purchased a space for her patients.

    Then began to care for them any way she could with what she had; which was more than what was being done for them in the first place.

  • WOW

    Bocaj you clearly have no idea of what Mother Teresa had to deal with.

    Mother Teresa had practically no support from the government of India (which is where she started out) and as such the only way she could procure any medicine was by begging for it and even then it wasn't always successful because even the hospitals in India were utterly overwhelmed.

  • Note also that the Church condemns those who delight in someone catching an STD. The classic phrase of 'hate the sin not the sinner' is clear here.

    And to those who condemn Mother Teresa as a "manipulative, opportunistic, genocidal fraud" I offer a challenge: produce evidence of this farce if you can..........which I doubt.

    And to those who think that people should use condemns and such because they can't control themselves.....

    Everyone is capable of self-control it just takes willpower.

  • The money that was given to Mother Teresa in the name of charity, that she claimed would be used to help the poor, was funded directly to the Roman Catholic Church. Her "patients" slept on floor beds, in squalor unsanitized conditions. Many of them died due to this. Many others died of the most basic and usually minor of illnesses and conditions that could have been cured with the most simple of medicine. She helped no one. She helped none of those of who she cared for to prevent dying.

  • I suggest you find Christopher Hitchens' documentary on Teresa. On her actions, and the purpose she fulfilled. She helped no one. She helped her "patients" spiritually. To "repent of their sins" before death. Death of illnesses and conditions that could have easily been treated and cured, in the hospitals in the cities that were very close to hers.

  • People seem to be missing the point here.

    For those who are religious the Church says that the use of condoms is wrong because it is not only ineffective it also gives the false appearance that sex outside of marriage is okay.

    The only 100% foolproof method to prevent STDs is Chastity and Purity.

    Consider to that pregnancy is one of the primary functions of sex. To try and prevent this natural occurrence by using a foreign object is not even natural much less moral.

  • Chastity and sexual continence are ideal.

    For those that are lost in sexual sin, I hope and pray that they will use condoms and birth control. While not 100% effective, they reduce the chances of illness and pregnancy. While some take delight in a sexual sinner getting STDs, I do not, especially when there may be a baby involved.I pray that the sexual sinner repent and turn from his wicked ways and to the Lord.

    We true believers must abstain from unlawful sex,condoms and birth control.

  • Okay, so you want me to get off the pill and not use condoms? Because, you know, that sounds UNSAFE.

  • UTubesPersn, what is unsafe is sex outside marriage. Conjugal relations is for married people.

  • Your reasoning is your complacent, unreasoned, consecrated dedication toward the subjective bigotry of religious doctrine. Your reasoning against contraception, is the identical reasoning of tribal Africans, the consequence indoctrination by Catholic missionaries such as Mother Teresa, that is fundamentally behind the AIDS epidemic in Africa that we see today. Mother Teresa, who I add, was a manipulative, opportunistic, genocidal fraud.

  • according to christianity, although this beleif may apply to christians and if so theyshould follow it for the convictions of their releigion. but the the rest off us shouldnt be told not to have sex, because it is not a sin to us. diseases can spread anywhere.

  • @rosemaryvivianne

    ok. well if you or your partner has an std then it doesn't matter if you are married or not. you need condoms for SAFE SEX. yes I said it. and I'm right.

  • @rosemaryvivianne Yeah really. The rest of us are just "stealing" from the married people! Here's an idea to the rest of you out there who don't have your head up your asses: GET YOUR PARTNER TESTED FIRST. If they are clean, and you are clean, there is a 0% risk of transmission of STDs.

    I find it sad that some people have nothing better to do with their lives, so they try to control others by means of scaremongering and other fear tactics.

  • rosemaryvivianne, I'm just wondering if the point of this video is to stop people from using condoms or stop people from having sex? also would you say that using a condom is a bad thing even if it did protect a person from a medical issue?

  • sleepnow18, the point of the video is stated at the end of the video.

  • So there's no more safe sex as we ealier thought...

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more