Too bad ASUS used a bad Linux os (a fork of Xandros) and an app download site that didn't work. They should have used either straight up Debian or PCLinuxOS and included WINE as standard and a manual on how to install and up date software as well as non-free media codecs.
@arganoth727 Then why do people thing Linux is better because it boots faster? DOS boots faster than Linux and it is obviously not better. Bootup time tests are quite stupid in todays world. (Pro tip: sleep mode is superior)
@JamesManes sleep mode still sucks power from your battery and net books don't have big batteries to start with. Linux is better for a lot of reasons, some you may care about some you probably won't. I used to be a windows user until XP turned me off, I hated macs so Linux was the only choice left, once I got my head around it (Installing and updating software is done differently), I found that it is easier to use and I like a lot of the software better. I also have a lot of fun tricking it out.
@JamesManes "Open source means nothing" Uh, actually it does. Anybody and any one can work on the source code to make it better or worse, Although it may NOT make the code better, it increases the possibility that it WILL be better because many people are working on it. Also, it keeps whatever it is free.
@theif519 You can sell opensource stuff, doesn't have to be free. If so many people work on the code, why is gimp not as good as photoshop? Why is openoffice not as good as MS office? Money = hiring professional coders = better outcome (Usually). Most open source alternatives are not as good as their proprietary counterparts.
"but what can you do with an Linux on a netbook?" I use mine for Skye - Thunderbird email IMPA - watching youtube, shelling into servers. 2.2LBs fits in back pack for travel..
BTW it actually boots faster - the guy did not have the fast boot option on - you can tweak things to boot in 5 sec - but a normal boot with firewall etc is about 15 -20sec.
On desktops running the latest KDE4 desk top we have passed Windoze in functionality (just visible in the review mirror )
lol linux is fastest yeah... but what can you do with an linux on a netbook? (dont comment with wine because wine needs performence lol) vista on netbook is like a 3gb harddrive in a quad core ... and xp may be fast but only the first 50 times you boot it then it gets slow.... get windows 7 its fast(even faster than xp :o) its compatible it has the design of vista and you can play games with it :p i got it on my netbook :D
omg xp was so fast i dont rly care about linux coz i dont rly know wot it is and dont want to go 2 it and even vista was fast my comp is intel core 2 duo t5870 2ghz 2gb ram and takes about 2 - 3 mins to boot vista! so slow! although when it started up its rly fast but still...
@Chintendoeddman Ye, but Vista is better than when its got released. I got a PC and a Notebook, both Vista, and i can run anything without problems and everything is just fine. I dont care if it loads up long.
@PS11833 yeah but it has alot of compatibility issues. The Windows Updates don't always work correctly and it takes a while to boot up and boot down ( bad thing for a student). I like Xp and Linux alot better
vistas shut down time is pathetic, reminds me of September, i used to take my laptop to school (its a turion x2 at 2.1 with 2.8 gb of ram, so its not bad) but the bell would go and it would take me sooo long to get out of class, i swear my friends hated me till i upgraded to 7
and by the way.. Imo a computer havn't started up, before its ready to use, and as everybody who has ever used a windows computer knows that it always has to load some a whole bunch of cr*p..
Hi there, you sould buy one more and install mac os on it, and test all 4 together, you may need one more person to help with the test though. nice video ; )
Knowing the eee pc im about to get has 4gb sdd memory can i download itunes and my music and have it work or do i have to use an external memory source
@er0d1975 linux users and their speed bragging rights...haha...my LFS is faster than your cookie cutter OS...neener neener...LOL..OK OK. SO I am lazy and I use a windows program.... geez shoot me. Note to ladies: Don't date linux users; they will forever rub it in your face when your system crashes. The only redeeming quality is we can rub their shitty graphics in theirs. So HA !
To be fair, such a system wouldnt be able to run Vista properly. I struggle to on my now low end PC
I am thinking of getting the 1005PE though and install linux on it(dual boot it at first to get used to it)-thinking of getting Ubuntu, as that is quite a popular one
hey do you have the official linpus linux from asus? i accedently formatted my partitiion with the linux for windows but i forgot that i didnt have the dvd/cd
I wonder what the setup is on each of these (as far as visual effects and programs on startup). The reason I ask if my current system is on win7 / Unbuntu dual boot and I'm using 2 raid SSD drives. They both boot up very very quick but the Win7 is slightly faster by a second or two.
Judging from the videos I've seen of Google's OS we're nowhere near to instant on/off. I believe with Google's OS we're looking at what? Maybe 12 seconds? I don't remember, maybe someone else can chime in.
Look I already posted a video of a 8.86sec boot! With just an AMD Athlon LE-1640(3.2GHz), 1GB ram, OCZ Vertex 30GB. Under 9sec boot with a regular tweaked XP. If you want to bet im in for any money.
Okay...I'm not sure what this proves...can someone help me out here...sure...I've got Vista, and 'some' of my games don't work - usually THQ or other companies who use starforce (Stalker not working was the kicker) But now they come up with Windows 7 - man, it should be FREE to anyone with a receipt showing that they bought that Vista shite.
vista has alot more themes and eye candy so it takes longer on the same power of speed
windows has a kernel tat has a login and shutdown process that safely logs every thing and erases pagefiles with 0's windows could of been the winner linux doesnt do that
You simply can't tweak XP into booting in ten seconds on a Asus EEE pc, not even with the Atom N270 processor! You would need multiple SSD's and a i7 Quad 3.00 Ghz and a very crappy piece of cut down XP edition. And that possibly won't be enough either.
Look I already posted a video of a 8.86sec boot! With just an AMD Athlon LE-1640(3.2GHz), 1GB ram, OCZ Vertex 30GB. Under 9sec boot with a regular tweaked XP. If you want to bet im in for any money.
I can't seem to find any video's posted with such a claim, but please enlighten me? And anyway, how have you been measuring the boottime? Via Microsoft own Bootvis or just your own intuition? OCZ Vertex 30 GB is one fast drive but please show me the video then.
8 second boot time with XP is definitely possible, I do it all the time. When the computer is in hibernation mode or standby mode, it's much faster to boot than from a completely cold boot.
vista only sucks because he diidnt have that much ram and didnt have that of a good processor a vista pc is only good with a 3GB ram or more. but i dont like vista :D not capable with most games :( i still like my old pc games :D so i want to stick with xp for a little longer time and my xp shuts down in 4 sec since the time pressing the turn off thing for windows xp.
I was looking at netbooks I only want one to type in a word processor and to surf the net. So a laggy OS is the last thing a little netbook needs. Nice to know XP is close in speed, its just all the annoying pop-ups and windows alerts and viruses that drive me crazy. For a low-powered netbook, Linux should work great. Kinda sad though that with Wine, Linux can probably play just as many windows XP games as Vista can.
i would disagree I have used all sorts of windows and I have only used ubuntu9.10 and my understanding of your situation is that its to difficult to do something as configuring and there are many of different way to configure and there as simple as looking on goggle and typing what you need then copy and paste into the terminal witch is basically a more complex version of CMD off of any version of windows and millions of people will help you with anything else you need.
ASUS Eee pc 904HD and i can't get it 2 connect 2 the internet ir even find a network and i downloaded the wireless driver but there's alot of problems.... can u help me :(
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
u turn off vista later vista is da best most games now come for vista and sometimes vista PLAYS XP GAMES- XP NOT BAD LINUX SUX LIKE UR VID VISTA 4 EVER !
Windows 7 will probably suck as bad as vista... xp isn't that "great" either. And the price is like 160 euro pro xp 64... is insane price. And you wonder why all internet providers with many servers run linux. It's not only free it's better.
=D I love linux, I run Ubuntu on my pc, i've always loved how fast it shuts down, but i don't like the boot, i mean is fast.. but i miss the old days when i was able to brew some coffe while XP was booting.
Just getting to the desktop doesn't mean the machine is booted and usable! XP in particular, usually takes another minute to be responsive. It cheats.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
hey coolwipe15 if he wants to download linux he coul ur not the mother fuckin president so why dont you go fuck ur dad and ur mom is busy with my so taka number.
WTf Linux SUcks dick. And you'll never get something free that is better you dumb fuck. Barely any ppl use linux thats why barely any pll hack linux, Why waste time hacking something when barely pll you use it. Dumb Fucks, Windows kills Linux! End of story!
Здрасти америкосы!!!!!Скажите мне пожалуйста,какой придурок впихнул в эту малютку Windows Vista?Вас же предупреждали что Vistaне дляслабых кампов...А Linux это воще недоОС...Обычному юзеру с ней не разобратся никогда...
Unfair test. first of, to make it fair, you need to make each computer with the maxium amount of ram each operating system can recognize so each is performing at maximum efficentcy (2.8GB for vista, 1.9GB for XP, not sure Linux) well, that would pretty much even the odds, im pretty sure thos thing only have 1.5GB of ram, maby 2, not sure.
Oh, Really? i didnt realize, the point im trying to bring across is that you cant put vista on a PC not nearly capable of handling it, and then bash vista for being slow, like many commenters are here. and, although windows XP can recognize 3.7GB ram for example, But it can only utilize 1.9 - 2GBs of ram
nope on tigerdirect it tells how many rams u can have u can have max 4GB on windows professional and xp home 32 bit but on the starter version u can only have 512 and 128 GB on Professional 64Bit
True... The XP thing isn't fully booted. He hits the stop watch before it even makes it's startup sound. As someone who is forced to use XP for work, I know you can't do shit for about another 90-180 seconds because it is still loading the OS.
Only if you have a lot of stuff set to start at startup, it should NOT take that long before you can use it, I use xp on my netbook, and after the startup sound it only takes like 2 or 3 seconds for the wifi to come on and for everything to be usable.
oh common man Free OS No Virus Open Source Free Programs and more more more.You need to pay Windows for have it legal download and run ubuntu 100% Legaly FULL SUPPORT :D
I have Vista,Developer Preview,and Windows 7 starter
kylerichouxj 1 month ago
How da hell is it the same computer
tlovitt34 3 months ago
you DEFINATELY should have done vista FIRST
timpster93 5 months ago
I thinking my fucked up Vista Will do netter id. I install xp on iy
majoortje 6 months ago
Wow, Vista really sucked.
dusthillguy 7 months ago 3
Too bad ASUS used a bad Linux os (a fork of Xandros) and an app download site that didn't work. They should have used either straight up Debian or PCLinuxOS and included WINE as standard and a manual on how to install and up date software as well as non-free media codecs.
arganoth727 8 months ago
DOS boots faster than all three operating systems shown here. Does that mean DOS is superior?
JamesManes 9 months ago
@JamesManes No DOS comandline is not as user friendly or functional as BASH.
arganoth727 8 months ago
@arganoth727 Then why do people thing Linux is better because it boots faster? DOS boots faster than Linux and it is obviously not better. Bootup time tests are quite stupid in todays world. (Pro tip: sleep mode is superior)
JamesManes 8 months ago
@JamesManes sleep mode still sucks power from your battery and net books don't have big batteries to start with. Linux is better for a lot of reasons, some you may care about some you probably won't. I used to be a windows user until XP turned me off, I hated macs so Linux was the only choice left, once I got my head around it (Installing and updating software is done differently), I found that it is easier to use and I like a lot of the software better. I also have a lot of fun tricking it out.
arganoth727 8 months ago
@JamesManes Open Source, Free, most customizable, very stable, most secure, and also it depends on what kind of user you are, but I digress.
theif519 8 months ago
@theif519 Opensource means nothing. So what if it is opensource that does not mean the code is better. It is just a different way of doing things.
JamesManes 8 months ago
@JamesManes "Open source means nothing" Uh, actually it does. Anybody and any one can work on the source code to make it better or worse, Although it may NOT make the code better, it increases the possibility that it WILL be better because many people are working on it. Also, it keeps whatever it is free.
theif519 8 months ago
@theif519 You can sell opensource stuff, doesn't have to be free. If so many people work on the code, why is gimp not as good as photoshop? Why is openoffice not as good as MS office? Money = hiring professional coders = better outcome (Usually). Most open source alternatives are not as good as their proprietary counterparts.
JamesManes 8 months ago
@JamesManes plz become the most relied vid
ateaparrot 8 months ago
i love linux :)
meinname28 9 months ago
thanks for this video ;)
alexerprogramador 10 months ago
Go xp
robilav 11 months ago
unbeliveable,u have so many asus eee pc
zoujiecheng 1 year ago
Vista is pants
cosytoesUK 1 year ago
man vista is slow
deverstator007 1 year ago
Comment removed
LNERMallard 1 year ago
@LNERMallard im sorry to say you must reinstall windows :(
510METROID 1 year ago
u don't have more hands?
jarekzkarzewski1 1 year ago
Funny, there's no mentioning what Linux distro it is, their boot times can vary significantly
aytech03 1 year ago
"but what can you do with an Linux on a netbook?" I use mine for Skye - Thunderbird email IMPA - watching youtube, shelling into servers. 2.2LBs fits in back pack for travel..
BTW it actually boots faster - the guy did not have the fast boot option on - you can tweak things to boot in 5 sec - but a normal boot with firewall etc is about 15 -20sec.
On desktops running the latest KDE4 desk top we have passed Windoze in functionality (just visible in the review mirror )
xtronics 1 year ago
its better to put linux on netbook
factory2012 1 year ago
lol linux is fastest yeah... but what can you do with an linux on a netbook? (dont comment with wine because wine needs performence lol) vista on netbook is like a 3gb harddrive in a quad core ... and xp may be fast but only the first 50 times you boot it then it gets slow.... get windows 7 its fast(even faster than xp :o) its compatible it has the design of vista and you can play games with it :p i got it on my netbook :D
TheYABCShadow 1 year ago
on notebooks is better to have win xp
xp is the fastest and the best for notebook
on a new pc you wont see eny diference on xp vs 7(with vista you will go like a crap..)
hackerw32 1 year ago
where is win 7??
hackerw32 1 year ago
Vista...SLOW
XP....Fast
Linux...Litle litle bit faster then XP
APK190 1 year ago
@APK190
even a super computer would run slow with vista...
hackerw32 1 year ago
@hackerw32 :D
Yea I agree!
BC Windows Vista is the badest OS ever...well it looks better then XP but still...7 is better and looking good too...
APK190 1 year ago
omg xp was so fast i dont rly care about linux coz i dont rly know wot it is and dont want to go 2 it and even vista was fast my comp is intel core 2 duo t5870 2ghz 2gb ram and takes about 2 - 3 mins to boot vista! so slow! although when it started up its rly fast but still...
hammy6427 1 year ago
linux el num 1
ived18 1 year ago
Vista on a laptop is like putting a V10 in a pinto
krazyliljoo94 1 year ago
How the heck did you get XP to boot that fast my EeePC 900 will take really long just to boot up, Thats why i used Ubuntu.
Speedster159 1 year ago
Windows Vista sucks if you have a low PC. Upgrade your ram on your Vista laptop and do the test again.
lunguvirgil3 1 year ago
linuxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
aldin8146 1 year ago
everything about vista sucks. XP ftw.
Chintendoeddman 1 year ago
@Chintendoeddman DirectX 10 too?
PS11833 1 year ago
@PS11833 Direct X is a memory hog. Vista requires 1 gigabyte of ram to run. Games take even more with Direct X.
Vista= looks
Xp=preformance
Chintendoeddman 1 year ago
@Chintendoeddman Ye, but Vista is better than when its got released. I got a PC and a Notebook, both Vista, and i can run anything without problems and everything is just fine. I dont care if it loads up long.
PS11833 1 year ago
@PS11833 yeah but it has alot of compatibility issues. The Windows Updates don't always work correctly and it takes a while to boot up and boot down ( bad thing for a student). I like Xp and Linux alot better
Chintendoeddman 1 year ago
@Chintendoeddman Yes it has, but i always found a way arount this issues :P
PS11833 1 year ago
@Chintendoeddman Looks applies for XP too. It has soo many cool themes.
Dani24Revay 9 months ago
@Dani24Revay yup. I have the Ubuntu Human theme and Microsoft Zune theme.
Chintendoeddman 9 months ago
What version of linux did you use?
JmaesN 1 year ago
Vista is dreadful, no wonder I bought a MacBook!
RussWWFC 1 year ago
@RussWWFC ha you bought a mac book it is even worse you should have got a pc and istalled xp or windows 7 or vista is even better then mac
masterjakguy 1 year ago
vistas shut down time is pathetic, reminds me of September, i used to take my laptop to school (its a turion x2 at 2.1 with 2.8 gb of ram, so its not bad) but the bell would go and it would take me sooo long to get out of class, i swear my friends hated me till i upgraded to 7
231karl 1 year ago
what linux you install in this computer ???
vanadiumV 1 year ago
and by the way.. Imo a computer havn't started up, before its ready to use, and as everybody who has ever used a windows computer knows that it always has to load some a whole bunch of cr*p..
actionpackedPIVII 1 year ago
well, if you all agree that the xp has started up before the startup sound your some dumb f*cks..
And, how can you say xp, vista and linux.. Linux is like saying windows just even more wide... say the f*cking name of the distro!!
actionpackedPIVII 1 year ago
linux es mejor que windows
marcoarq5447 1 year ago
wow so thats why i still see xp on the small laptops at bastbuy and vista does fail
178caboose 1 year ago
thanks .merci la preuve en image que vista est lourd
canecool 1 year ago
43 seconds to turn off... OMG :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDd
RangerDK21 1 year ago
@earthling10 that was on the Acer, the EEEPC has Linux Xandros.
Jzarecta 1 year ago
VISTA SUCKS D:
tristanvideo 1 year ago
Lol Vista is so shite
jazcash 1 year ago
Vista lost, the harddrive isn't built for vista it was built for XP, however in looks i think Vista wins
TempskayyPro 1 year ago
Great demonstration! It's really helpfull for me, becouse i'm going do buy this netbook. Thanks!
Szymi2007 1 year ago
What distro/DE are we using on the linux book? I bet we could shave some more time off that things boot.
"The performance difference is negligible when you consider the superior device support XP has over Linux."
I've said that alot, I just switched the terms "device support" and "performance".
alwaystheuke 1 year ago
u cnt balme vista for being slow, u ned at least 2 gbs to run it because its dat gd
ZhanTaoF 1 year ago
is that supposed to be English ?
muhammatsu 1 year ago
Hi there, you sould buy one more and install mac os on it, and test all 4 together, you may need one more person to help with the test though. nice video ; )
whatatidymess 2 years ago
or maybe vista vs windows 7
ZhanTaoF 1 year ago
I don't like 7 or vista, xp all the way, well tell windows 8 and 128 bit cpu's come out....
would like to see how 7 does though.
whatatidymess 1 year ago
@whatatidymess
windows 7 is awsome lol. and why the fuck would you need a 128 bit os? really dude? why would we need a couple hundred terabytes of ram -.-
TheCompyshop 1 year ago
7's ok, 128 bit os? more Power and speed, more sophisticated apps that will run faster.
whatatidymess 1 year ago
@whatatidymess
128 bit dosent mean anything runs faster. just lets your use more memory. like i said before you dont need a few hundred terabytes of ram lol
TheCompyshop 1 year ago
64bit can use a maximum of 16TERABYTES of ram, no civilian has that much ram in one machine
fallenspirit123 1 year ago
Why do microsoft want to make windows 8 128bit then?
whatatidymess 1 year ago
ask them not me
fallenspirit123 1 year ago
Knowing the eee pc im about to get has 4gb sdd memory can i download itunes and my music and have it work or do i have to use an external memory source
vidman10123 2 years ago
KolibriOS more faster :) 5 sec boot.
KABISOF 2 years ago
Why are you turning them on and off so much? Just USE them for a few minutes.
013108today 2 years ago
i think the reason why vist lost is because he doesnt have enough ram in that one =p
SuperMustache11 2 years ago
my vista load faster than xp
jhayem12 2 years ago
my LFS (Linux) is even more faster :-)
er0d1975 2 years ago 2
@er0d1975 linux users and their speed bragging rights...haha...my LFS is faster than your cookie cutter OS...neener neener...LOL..OK OK. SO I am lazy and I use a windows program.... geez shoot me. Note to ladies: Don't date linux users; they will forever rub it in your face when your system crashes. The only redeeming quality is we can rub their shitty graphics in theirs. So HA !
julie1300 1 year ago
i just installed a dual boot Linux Mint 8 and xp on my 1005ha, I love it.
1992Raiden 2 years ago
To be fair, such a system wouldnt be able to run Vista properly. I struggle to on my now low end PC
I am thinking of getting the 1005PE though and install linux on it(dual boot it at first to get used to it)-thinking of getting Ubuntu, as that is quite a popular one
waqasahmed939 2 years ago
i am gnu linux user and developer ok
and this test is true 100%
cause kernel linux build for you own hardware of pc or notepad
and problem in other os is not only hardware
is GUI is compiled with kernel but in gnu linux no
caus gui may be gnoe or kde or lxde or etc
but i thank you man for this test boot
dololA1 2 years ago
look i am gnu linux user and developer ok
the gnu linux can boot more then any os in this world ok
cause is compatible with most hardware 100%
cause is compile for your own machine so
there is no different between any distributor
slackware or ubuntu or redhat or etc of gnu linux distributor
ok
here i guess he use ubuntu i am not sure cause splash is not familiar to me
but i want say thank you man for this test boot
dololA1 2 years ago
ah i see. i'll give it a try, thanks for responding on my comment :D
123456789sha 2 years ago
hey do you have the official linpus linux from asus? i accedently formatted my partitiion with the linux for windows but i forgot that i didnt have the dvd/cd
123456789sha 2 years ago
What version/distro of Linux was tested?
lewiar 2 years ago
wow vista is soooooooooooooooooooooo slow with an asus
MrGuitarguy99 2 years ago
I wonder what the setup is on each of these (as far as visual effects and programs on startup). The reason I ask if my current system is on win7 / Unbuntu dual boot and I'm using 2 raid SSD drives. They both boot up very very quick but the Win7 is slightly faster by a second or two.
Banjogoose 2 years ago
7 seconds is still nowhere near instant.
mahadragon 2 years ago
Judging from the videos I've seen of Google's OS we're nowhere near to instant on/off. I believe with Google's OS we're looking at what? Maybe 12 seconds? I don't remember, maybe someone else can chime in.
mahadragon 2 years ago
@mahadragon
7 seconds
cronatos 2 years ago
still nowhere near instant
mahadragon 2 years ago
I´ll upload a video of a sub-10 sec XP boot as soon i have time and patience. Easy stuff but people are so hard-headed.... gezzz
wsbygt 2 years ago
i have vista and i know its a memory hog but i rly want linux =]
Guy132 2 years ago
Get more hands or friends...
McFishbones 2 years ago
What linux kernel is that?
laptoplover2 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look I already posted a video of a 8.86sec boot! With just an AMD Athlon LE-1640(3.2GHz), 1GB ram, OCZ Vertex 30GB. Under 9sec boot with a regular tweaked XP. If you want to bet im in for any money.
wsbygt 2 years ago
little wrong there my 900 is really slow after boot on xp try use controlpanel and surf at the same time then you have to wait like forever!!!!
enemy71 2 years ago
Okay...I'm not sure what this proves...can someone help me out here...sure...I've got Vista, and 'some' of my games don't work - usually THQ or other companies who use starforce (Stalker not working was the kicker) But now they come up with Windows 7 - man, it should be FREE to anyone with a receipt showing that they bought that Vista shite.
March6371 2 years ago
vista has alot more themes and eye candy so it takes longer on the same power of speed
windows has a kernel tat has a login and shutdown process that safely logs every thing and erases pagefiles with 0's windows could of been the winner linux doesnt do that
wellivea1 2 years ago
Windows XP FTW.
If i tweaked that XP, it would boot in ten seconds.
wsbygt 2 years ago
You simply can't tweak XP into booting in ten seconds on a Asus EEE pc, not even with the Atom N270 processor! You would need multiple SSD's and a i7 Quad 3.00 Ghz and a very crappy piece of cut down XP edition. And that possibly won't be enough either.
Mantua64 2 years ago
Look I already posted a video of a 8.86sec boot! With just an AMD Athlon LE-1640(3.2GHz), 1GB ram, OCZ Vertex 30GB. Under 9sec boot with a regular tweaked XP. If you want to bet im in for any money.
wsbygt 2 years ago
I can't seem to find any video's posted with such a claim, but please enlighten me? And anyway, how have you been measuring the boottime? Via Microsoft own Bootvis or just your own intuition? OCZ Vertex 30 GB is one fast drive but please show me the video then.
Mantua64 2 years ago
8 second boot time with XP is definitely possible, I do it all the time. When the computer is in hibernation mode or standby mode, it's much faster to boot than from a completely cold boot.
mahadragon 2 years ago
Looks like Linux is the clear winner here.
analyzingfunny 2 years ago
Vista sucks.
haizahaiza 2 years ago
vista only sucks because he diidnt have that much ram and didnt have that of a good processor a vista pc is only good with a 3GB ram or more. but i dont like vista :D not capable with most games :( i still like my old pc games :D so i want to stick with xp for a little longer time and my xp shuts down in 4 sec since the time pressing the turn off thing for windows xp.
EminemBeastFan24 2 years ago
lol yeah judge an entire operating system on how it boots up and shuts down, very clever and smart
BorkGonsam 2 years ago
@BorkGonsam
If it is not a server who runs 24/7 but a notebook that you boot and shut down quite often I would say: Time is money and definitey a criterion.
haizahaiza 2 years ago
i don't see any judgment just a test of booting
jwiska 2 years ago
That was a reply to another persons comment, youtube is too stupid to put replies under comments now, since google fucked youtube over
BorkGonsam 2 years ago
y cual de los SO te gusta mas?
CHOKOLO951 2 years ago
LINUX WIIIINS!
hidudes1000 2 years ago
i agree, except the xandros was pretty crappy, i put ubuntu on instead. fedora works good too
schmidtbag 2 years ago
Thanks for posting this video!
I was looking at netbooks I only want one to type in a word processor and to surf the net. So a laggy OS is the last thing a little netbook needs. Nice to know XP is close in speed, its just all the annoying pop-ups and windows alerts and viruses that drive me crazy. For a low-powered netbook, Linux should work great. Kinda sad though that with Wine, Linux can probably play just as many windows XP games as Vista can.
ToKoMiKo 2 years ago
I do not think Vista takes so long to close everything.
I feel like there is no reason to compare Windows to Linux.
the issue is that for many people it cost to use Linux is difficult to configure and do a lot more than windows it is more convenient ..
Linux is very good greetings not compare with Windows
Spaghetiss 2 years ago
i would disagree I have used all sorts of windows and I have only used ubuntu9.10 and my understanding of your situation is that its to difficult to do something as configuring and there are many of different way to configure and there as simple as looking on goggle and typing what you need then copy and paste into the terminal witch is basically a more complex version of CMD off of any version of windows and millions of people will help you with anything else you need.
poslla7486 2 years ago
no Vista dont let me down!
EXT109 2 years ago
hey man can u help me pleaaze....
i've just install Vista home premium on my
ASUS Eee pc 904HD and i can't get it 2 connect 2 the internet ir even find a network and i downloaded the wireless driver but there's alot of problems.... can u help me :(
Shamarocy 2 years ago
press fn+f2 (i think) to turn on the wireless card
joemeredith 2 years ago
yeah fn+f2 is for switching the wireless 2 on.....
but i think i need the Eee pc 904HD wireless driver.....
and i have searched everywhere :(
Shamarocy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
u turn off vista later vista is da best most games now come for vista and sometimes vista PLAYS XP GAMES- XP NOT BAD LINUX SUX LIKE UR VID VISTA 4 EVER !
smokslyboltx 2 years ago
Mind telling me how to install Xp on one, Mine came with linux
Ashman8080 2 years ago
if u want windows xp professional or windows xp home edition tell me message me pm me
EminemBeastFan24 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Posting request on your channel then.
MetricJester 2 years ago
Why is he an idiot for turning on tree computers.
video45000 2 years ago
i was talking to stseiyag
DavidPlim 2 years ago
Vista is pretty slow... i could make this with my ASUS EEE Pc witch dual boots Mac OS X and Windows XP...
PSPiGH 2 years ago
po el vista no veas lo rapido q se carga
antoniobeti 2 years ago
any day now vista. man i made a mistake getting that on my netbook. oh well don't have the money for XP now, i'll have to wait for 7.
supersnot4 2 years ago
XP64bit is from 2004 or 2005
stseiyag 2 years ago
hi, do you know if the 1000he comes with linux
ibmxx 2 years ago
lol when the vista shuts down he walks away and comes back
metalsystem761 2 years ago 2
Windows 7 will probably suck as bad as vista... xp isn't that "great" either. And the price is like 160 euro pro xp 64... is insane price. And you wonder why all internet providers with many servers run linux. It's not only free it's better.
stseiyag 2 years ago
my linux crashes all the time
it even crashes when i browse youtube
Busegry 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
you are a troll STFU
DavidPlim 2 years ago
which distro?
death80 2 years ago
go xp!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
windowsxp71 2 years ago
linux is best
AngryComputerNerd045 2 years ago 2
=D I love linux, I run Ubuntu on my pc, i've always loved how fast it shuts down, but i don't like the boot, i mean is fast.. but i miss the old days when i was able to brew some coffe while XP was booting.
otharennaur 2 years ago
linux and XP are best :] vista is shitt I wanna get an eee pc but i dunno wich one is best for gameing :l they dont have the cd drive ayy :( helpp
wtfisupyou 2 years ago
My Aunt would've give me the Linux instead of this XP.. what's better? linux or xp?
babymae143 2 years ago
very nice video...
geetkabir 2 years ago
so xp starts quicker and linux shuts down quicker???
ReptileGamer 2 years ago
No buddy, actually Linux starts 4 seconds faster and shuts down even faster, especially 'cause it never updates at shutting down
otharennaur 2 years ago
Just getting to the desktop doesn't mean the machine is booted and usable! XP in particular, usually takes another minute to be responsive. It cheats.
aribenzane 2 years ago
Go VISTA! =))
comebackata2 2 years ago 3
lol
like a tortoise pulling a tractor hahaha
SmokeMeDry 2 years ago
Linux速いな
takuya393 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hey coolwipe15 if he wants to download linux he coul ur not the mother fuckin president so why dont you go fuck ur dad and ur mom is busy with my so taka number.
sammymunir 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WTf Linux SUcks dick. And you'll never get something free that is better you dumb fuck. Barely any ppl use linux thats why barely any pll hack linux, Why waste time hacking something when barely pll you use it. Dumb Fucks, Windows kills Linux! End of story!
coolwipe15 2 years ago
Woah, nice one by Linux! Never used it before though, :P
I hope that it was a fair test, meaning that they all had the same amount of used space, specs, ETC...
anzin74 2 years ago 2
All systems used identical hardware
earthling10 2 years ago
Здрасти америкосы!!!!!Скажите мне пожалуйста,какой придурок впихнул в эту малютку Windows Vista?Вас же предупреждали что Vistaне дляслабых кампов...А Linux это воще недоОС...Обычному юзеру с ней не разобратся никогда...
Mi6a1990 2 years ago
wow you dont really start at the same time wtf
TheHabboNoobie 2 years ago
Unfair test. first of, to make it fair, you need to make each computer with the maxium amount of ram each operating system can recognize so each is performing at maximum efficentcy (2.8GB for vista, 1.9GB for XP, not sure Linux) well, that would pretty much even the odds, im pretty sure thos thing only have 1.5GB of ram, maby 2, not sure.
TeamIain 2 years ago
Are you fucking serious? The point of this test was to show the boot times of different os'es on the SAME computer...
And the OS doesn't recognize a certain amount of memory, it's that 32 bit processors limit the amount usable.
efrankie90 2 years ago
Oh, Really? i didnt realize, the point im trying to bring across is that you cant put vista on a PC not nearly capable of handling it, and then bash vista for being slow, like many commenters are here. and, although windows XP can recognize 3.7GB ram for example, But it can only utilize 1.9 - 2GBs of ram
TeamIain 2 years ago
xp isnt 1.9GB max ram its 3GB Max and vista i dont no :D
EminemBeastFan24 2 years ago
i have 2GB in mine, but XP HOME SP3 only sees 1.75. so maybe your wrong?
iPiracy 2 years ago
nope on tigerdirect it tells how many rams u can have u can have max 4GB on windows professional and xp home 32 bit but on the starter version u can only have 512 and 128 GB on Professional 64Bit
EminemBeastFan24 2 years ago
on vista 32 bit 4GB and on starter 32 bit 1GB
EminemBeastFan24 2 years ago
True... The XP thing isn't fully booted. He hits the stop watch before it even makes it's startup sound. As someone who is forced to use XP for work, I know you can't do shit for about another 90-180 seconds because it is still loading the OS.
jonvanflan 2 years ago
Only if you have a lot of stuff set to start at startup, it should NOT take that long before you can use it, I use xp on my netbook, and after the startup sound it only takes like 2 or 3 seconds for the wifi to come on and for everything to be usable.
zsmorr92 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow urserious
it depends on the ram an how new it is
ALSO MINE VISTA ONLY TAKES 3 SEC TO START T AND 5 SEC TO SHUTDOWN
blueskin95 2 years ago
You are using "Sleep" mode. Try actually turning it off.
ElsewhereIsHere 2 years ago 4
kidding 44 sec... omg!!!
tommyjones1978 2 years ago
two things:
u have 2 admit that vista is running well on the eeepc
and wld vista destroy it, like make it over heat.
also would it run on mine:
1.6ghz atom processor
1gb ram
bigbang560 2 years ago
TRUE VISTA IS SLOW
Xboxshqip 2 years ago
These Xp Vs Linux boot tests aren`t Valid.
1)After the desktop screen shows up Windows is still booting many background tasks.
2) Unless you keep XP off the net, you need decent non-M$ Anti-Virus, Firewall, Ad-ware & Pop-up & Script blockers to be safe enough to use.
3)Plus a Boot manger, to control all those pesky hidden installed without permission background programs, that slow everything down.
Now do a boot test & see the time difference!
These points don`t apply to the Linux versions.
DRK0NE 2 years ago
vista needs a lot of Ram and gigs to run fast
omgxginoxrocks 2 years ago
Linux is better than windows and it will be 4ever better than windows Windows Sucks Linux Rocks
Debian,Ubuntu,Fedora,Mandriva ect are better than all windows
TuxGnome 2 years ago
Which is exactly why 4% of computers run it.
Fanboy.
RookeU2B 2 years ago
oh common man Free OS No Virus Open Source Free Programs and more more more.You need to pay Windows for have it legal download and run ubuntu 100% Legaly FULL SUPPORT :D
Linux #1
TuxGnome 2 years ago
who cares how many computers run it. Linux dominates windows. a linux PC will last longer than a windows pc.
FedoraFTW 2 years ago 2
how do you figure?
kenfo0 2 years ago
common sence.
linux has far less threats than windows.
as in viruses,malware ect.
linux is overall a better OS.