there is no correlation to barack obama and the death of soldiers in Afghanistan. bush vs obama in golf? bush was never viraly tracked down like obama. Obama should be president of the world. he has the right spirit.
in the beginning stements he makes an outstanding point about obama. He not only wants to be president of the U.S but also the entire world. Well lets see if you can fix the basic problems before you move on to bigger and badder problems.
I hate this ass clown. He's such a pussy because he won't let you comment on his channel without him approving it. He doesn't want everyone exposing his hucksterish economic beliefs. If I could compare his beliefs to something, I would compare him to the "gold tablet reading" and convicted fraud Joseph Smith (see mormon religion).
That prick lifeless loser bigbengamer has been hounding my account and sending me threatening personal messages ever since I stopped commenting on this page. What in the fuck is wrong with that douchebag? Can somebody like help me get him distracted onto somebody else so he stops lying and bragging and threatening me?
@Tripo1iSamson LMAO i have not sent one threatening message to you, you lying prick. i don't have to threaten you, when i know you don't have the mentality to have an intelligent conversation. you're a real scumbag, you know. i love how you removed your messages to hide what you said to me. now you can say anything. that's just like fox news washing the transcripts of their shows every day. people like you are a waste of carbon
in fact, i haven't sent a personal message to you at all. i tried to post a comment on your channel, telling you simply how you should read more from both sides of the spectrum, then you'd have a better understanding of what exactly is going on. but then you had to disapprove that one, and leave your 'intellect' all over my channel. by the way, anyone is free to look at it if they wish. feel free to see what kind of personality this piece of work is trying to hide so he can manipulate you
first of all this conversation was from more than a month ago. second you really believe what they are saying about carbon? how the hell can it be polluting the environment if its the basic building block of the universe? this planet is 4.5 billion years old. people have been on this earth for just under 2 million years. 90% of all species that existed on this planet are extinct. you really think we're gonna kill this planet? it did fine before us, it'll do fine after us. fox is still wrong
I think i took the "waste of carbon" thing the wrong way, i thought you were saying he was a waste of carbon as in he was a waste of breathe because he is exhaling CO2.
Anway i think that the whole global warming thing is a HUGE scam to achieve political goals, particularly a one world government.
As far as fox news goes, they aren't aren't any worse than any other channel. I'm not going to defend them either. It's all T.V. anyway.
HTWW, you say they are american citizens exercising their right to the first amendment. but they are journalists. and fox is supposed to be a NEWS AGENCY. news agencies do not have the luxury of exercising their free speech. their job is to provide accurate information, and truth is something fox repeatedly omits, if it doesn't fit into the context they are trying to create. i can understand bias, but when your entire network caters to a political party, its no longer a news agency
HTWW, i love how you try to put the blame for the US troop death toll on obama, when that war has been going on for nearly eight years due to the mismanagement and underfunding of the troops by bush. in fact, the same secretary of defense, bill gates, has reissued the budget, with a 9% increase in spending, and most of the funds returned towards conventional warfare, like the armor our troops needed four years ago
What the fuck does "speak truth to power" mean? Seriously, do the people who use that stupid ,inane , nonsensical phrase realize how stupid they sound? I think the left needs hollow phrases like "choice and competition" or "Truth to power" in lieu of true logical debate. Try speaking english to a fellow american. Try speaking nicely to your local librarian, they might direct you to a book. Maybe Atlas Shrugged. Speak "truth to power" to your pothead, compost smelling, hippie friends.
I can't say I am a big fan of Fox news after the 8 years of Bush getting a free ride from them while he shredded the constitution, but it makes me sick to hear people like Jarrett trying to justify abuse of presidential power.
one thing i agree with you about, HTWW, is that they are private citizens excersizing their right to free speech. that's exactly what fox is doing. so lets stop pretending they are excercising the right to freedom of the press, because their news only follows up on the commentaries of the same station
hey dude, try this. When I get pulled over, I wish it was me who had a gun and a tazer and the officer who was the pothead. Maybe Democrats should take some fucking business 101 classes and liberals should work blue collar jobs, and some Republicans should smoke dope and obsess over celebrities .
I got NO problem with what you're saying. Like you, I want the damn government to leave me alone and let me conduct my business honestly; you cannot believe how often I have to deal with their regulators, who screw first and ask questions later. And I'm powerless to do anything about it.
lmao 30k? i charge $500 per hour to design websites, and i could have had a much better version of the gop website up in only five hours. so for $2500 they republican party could have had a quality website. and to think you conservatives elected these people into office. business and accounting should be a requisite for federal elected offices
there you go again. assuming you know what i believe. you think you know me, but you really don't. you can't seem to fill in the gaps without even asking me.
Fine, you're a moderate, collectivist, socialist, democrat, progressive web designer.
Whatever. As for "conservatives" being Republicans, you got it wrong. Republicans BETTER be Conservatives or they'll be nothing but Democrat Lite, and a perpetual minority party.
You don't understand "conservatism," but when the government controls your business as it does mine, you'll find out for yourself what we stand for.
I deal in the capital markets; over regulated, over controlled, over policed, and over legislated. AND the ONLY part of it that works is by people like me.
I'm an ex Wall Street who has watched the destruction of my industry and the rest of America by Democrat dirtbags who control the agenda and the Press hamstringing the rest of us, only to be re-elected with the help of the power elite within the community I'm a part of.
The leaders of Wall Street are overwhelmingly Democrat.
do you ever wonder WHY the leaders of wall street are overwhelmingly democrat? i mean, if the market was truly over regulated, wouldn't they be leaning more to the republicans? or did they just switch sides because the president is a democrat? with the amount of people being screwed out of this, versus the amount of people who are actually benefiting from these regulation(designed to allow small businesses to compete with large corporations), i'd say that these regulations are doing much better
No, they wouldn't be republicans. The CURRENT STATE of WALL STREET, The FED, Housing, The SEC, FINRA, you name it, is as a direct result of DEMOCRAT control of government.
And YOU WOULD say that about small business, because you think republicans are PRO-Big Business, and that's where you're being a sucker, because Big Business likes Big Government, hence Democrat Control.
ok i'm really confused by what you are saying. democrats over regulate the very big businesses that love them for it? this is a contradictory in your argument. a major one. of the majority of big business are dems, and the dems are slapping all these regs on the market, why are you even bothering to be in wall street? or is it the republicans that over regulate? of that's so, why are you against the democrats?
It's obvious you really don't know how Wall Street or Main Street operates. Big business obtains protections from regulations that minimize competition, they can afford the attorneys and internal regulators to meet government regulation nonsense, small business cannot.
So, Big Business has a vested interest in regulations. Democrats are pro Big Business, Big Unions, Big Government.
i'm spotting yet another major contradiction. you are saying that big business obtains protection from regulations that would otherwise MINIMIZE competition? why would big businesses not want to minimize competition? that means more profits for them. and if big business has a vested interest in regulations, shouldn't you been mad at them for allowing you to be so heavily regulated? why hate the government if your boss is allowing it to happen? your venting is grossly misplaced
It was those darn religious types that forced lending institutions to lend indiscriminately and riskily, it's those religious people who spread STD's, drug use, violence, all that stuff, huh? Like those Christian inner-city Chicago gang members who killed that kid with a railroad tie. Oh wait....
wow are you blowing this out of proportion! what the hell did anyone say about religion? we've been talking about the economy. please get out of this conversation. what little relevant information to the subject at hand here is clouded with its lack of logic
I can read your comments and comment on them the same as anyone else, mayne. That's the curse of going around on youtube and showing off how little you know about things like personal responsibility, independence, self-sufficiency, reliability, etc, but rather entitlements, free stuff, video games, a constant government mom to make your sandwiches for you when you live in your government housing apartment and watch shitty redundant news channels that all reinforce the same ideas. Awesome.
the only ones here showing off their abundance of ignorance is you and your boyfriend, El Capitan. why don't you go practice playing golf together, you can hide in the sand trap and stroke each other's clubs
wow, that's all? i did double than when i went into business for myself. and all i had to do was sit in this chair and type code. well it wasn't this chair. i've had four since then.
And bigben you haven't spotted any contradictions in what captain has been saying, you're just announcing assumptions in a bombastic manner. There are some businesses that stand to gain from relying on the government while there are some that stand to gain via deregulation. Nobody's "venting" is "misplaced," rather, our economic giants all the way down to the small businessman and women in this country are footing the fill for government waste and for lazy people, like most liberal teenagers.
And bigben, if you'd ever looked up how a corporation works, there is majority representation and voting to be done, theoretically, and that in NAME is a DEMOCRATIC practice, though not OF the democrat party. Get it, idiot? And there are democrat businesspeople, it's not black and white.
so your profession isn't in demand anymore. you think computer science was my first choice? did i mention yet that i also have a degree in avionics, and i have a private pilot's license, WITH a multi engine rating? i started when i was 18, and i got my degree just after 9/11. by then flying wasn't as popular as it used to be because someone flew a plane into your building, and i my job offers were rescinded with 35k in tuition to pay. but i found a way to succeed. so stop crying
Big: I never said my profession isn't in demand. The issue is NOT my profession, but the REGULATORS who control it.
I'm not crying, I'm observing that what people like you believe is nothing but more nonsense. REGULATION does not work. And history is on my side in this argument. Obama is PRO Big Government and Collectivism, and he must fail for America to succeed. The world is a massive plase of immense competition, I'm not afraid of that, I'm afraid of the slavery that Obama is in favor of.
by your argument, keeping a rabid dog in a cage is over regulating. even though the people are safe from it, it violates the dog's freedom of expression. even bush had mentioned on several occasions how wall street was out of control. yet regulations designed to recover that control of the market, in order to monitor the means and ethics of people's systems of prospering in wall street, are not what the market needs. well then i ask you, since you are an expert. what exactly is it that we need?
My argument is that The People are able to shoot a rabid dog more quickly than the government can regulate the rabid dog from existence.
Wall Street was not "out of control." Wall Street has been operating within the regulation parameters established by Congress and its regulating bodies. This is why NO ONE has gone to jail, and the people who created this mess, are still in charge.
Are you such a dupe that you cannot see who's behind this fiasco? There's info right her on YT.
that's like saying the only thing that works in a storage facility is people being honest enough not to steal your stuff there. in order to keep an honest man honest, you have to keep a lock on your door. the same principle applies to the market. regulations are needed to keep dishonest and otherwise honest people from creating the pandemic that is now our economic situation. you make rules for your kids, don't you? you make sure that your rules for them are to ensure their safety, right?
i completely agree with you. the federal reserve is the primary problem with our economy. this country was founded on two main principles: no religion in government, and no central bank. politics, from both sides of the aisle, has flooded this country with both. however, we're not talking about the central bank. we're talking about the economy and the market and how the dems are regulating corps that love them. and if you must know, i'm an excellent pilot. but please stay on topic
and for god's sake, answer my question on how the major corporations can be mostly democratic if they complain that the democrats are over regulating them. you contradicted yourself, and you keep trying to change the subject to avert your answering this. you painted yourself into a corner and i'm not letting you go until you justify why you said two completely different things
you think it's "religion" in government and the federal reserve that's entirely responsible for America's current problems? Interesting, though it shouldn't even hold up in a high school argument paper.
captaindiesalot you can't reason with people that don't understand the basic economic principles their lives operate under, much less their culture, preservation, right to exist, right to earn, etc, etc. It seems like a lot of Americans and people in the developed are willing to throw it all away for government programs, housing, and that terrible, dangerous thing that environmorons want, deindustrialization. These people should get paid not to share their ideas for the sake of humanity.
then you'd complain that we are getting something for nothing. people like you just don't seem to understand how complex the situation is. its more complex than i can completely decipher. but i'm not pretending to know all of the answers. i'm criticizing someone else for acting like he does, and saying "for america to succeed, obama has to fail". well the last eight years of bush was no success. it was a total failure. and america has been failing ever since. and he was even on your side
Most likely for my business to succeed, the leftist tendency of every few presidencies in this country needs to stop. And the last eight years of Bush "was no success"? Okay, why? Cuz he wasn't liked? Because we're in a war that's possibly in our best interest? Yes, what a bastard! At least Obama had the amazing courage to go around the world and apologize to dictators and suck up to Saudi Arabian Wahhabists and then say thanks for not insulting him directly, only his country.
which was is in our best interest? the war in afghanistan, where after eight years, we still have an unstable situation there? or the war in iraq, which had nothing to do with 9/11 and after six+ years, is still an unstable situation? the only interests that are being satisfied with those wars are the defense contractors, which most of our debt is going to now.
i've nothing more to say to you. you cannot provide a reasoned argument of your own. you are having to use someone else's
And "people like me" would complain about getting something for nothing? No, more like I'd be pissed about having to provide any employees I may have with insurance while not making enough for myself. So fuck your argument.
without regulations, people could still buy all the cough syrup they wanted to keep making meth. they can keep receiving student loans, then filing bankruptcy so they don't have to pay them back. they can keep having more children so welfare will pay them more each month. regulations are necessary in every aspect of life, because sadly we aren't as honest and disciplined as you think. we aren't japanese, you know.
but you still didn't answer my question. how can bigt business love the democrats, when they are the ones putting all these regulations on them? how is it that they can lick the hand that isn't feeding them? how can your argument contradict itself and still be logical? i'm waiting for your response...
"Conservatives" do NOT believe in government. We believe in less government, lower taxes, less regulation, less spending on horseshit domestic programs that don't work, we believe in National Defense; defense of borders, the de-funding of the UN.
We think Capitalism is good and Collectivism is a Fucking disaster. You're a website designer, well, how would you like it if I told you NOTHING you do can be published without MY approval? Welcome to MY business, asshole.
you mean the bill about net neutrality? yeah, typical argument from someone who'd rather be right even if they aren't correct. i've read the bill, because i make good money on the internet. and there is nothing in it that scares me. if there was anything about that bill that suggested that it would hinder my ability to maintain my income, i'd be agreeing with you in this.
who said anything about Net neutrality? The government regulates EVERYTHING I do, and it's completely unfair, expensive, and DOESN'T work, but meely mouthed people like you say "businessmen" need to be policed.
Fuck off, I've NEVER screwed a client in my life, if I did I'd be out of business very quickly.
You deal with bullshit websites, I deal with REAL people who rely upon my skills for the security of their lives.
please stop with the profanity. i have respected you enough to not swear at you, even though your lack of logic tries my patience. just answer my question: what is your business?
god i hate computer science students. they think because they learned something about web design, they are the only ones who know. they act like air force fighter pilots with their level of arrogance. what i hate the most about them is that i used to be the same way when i was a student haha
I read the whole Grayson thing. Yeah... that woman is a whore.
As for his attack on Republicans, that's ironic since he attacked the lobbyist calling her a whore in defense of the Audit the Fed bill... which was written by a Republican...
HowTheWorldWorks, while I seriously disagree with your political ideology, I enjoy your videos very much. You are a very good public speaker and entertainer.
I enjoy your videos, however you still fail to realize that the game isn't republicans against democrats. At the very top they are both evil and work together against the interests of "we the people". Once you wake up to this reality you will be a force for truth. Until then, you are just as bad a propagandist for the lesser of two evils.
Not even close Libtard hasn't got a leg to stand on here and HTWW doesn't need to refute such an obviously flawed argument. There are many willing to show you, LiberalViewer, and his many vote bots how wrong you are.
"HTWW doesn't need to refute such an obviously flawed argument.............there are many willing to show you how wrong you are" - nice contradictory logic. But seriously, a debater that "doesn't need" to respond to an arguement put to him? Sort of missing the point of being a self-opinionated fucktard isnt it? I'll just assume Im responding to one of HTWW's many soc accounts.
Yet another post from you that makes no sense and has no bearing on anything.
it isn't contradictory, you just can't comprehend the perspective. Massive FAIL on your part and here's why:
The argument wasn't valid. HTWW has no need to reply to nonsense allegations that change nothing. LibTard was trying to split a hair and create a straw man argument. There are more than enough HTWW followers to point that out to him and you.
And it is contradictory. You cannot find a direct quote where Jarrett said they're "attacking Fox News because the White House believes in speaking truth to power. But then you say there are plenty of people willing to show you how wrong you are..........still waiting.
Hollow accusation? Like accusing people of having a different viewpoint from you as being a votebot? HTWW has a proven tract record for having soc accounts. So it isnt a hollow accusation at all, Failbot.
You can't find a direct quote where they called out someone else other than Fox since Obama sent out the Mao-loving goosestepper, Anita Dunn.
Like LibTard, you fail to understand simple concepts like context and subject matter. The subject matter was FNC bias when she made the comment. The context was her defense of only calling out FNC when confrinted with the question of MSNBC.
Like accusing people that have a different point of view as "self-opinionated?
Just because you are unwilling to accept the truth that you were wrong doesn't change the fact...that you were wrong. Refusal to admit it is not exoneration.
How would soc accounts prove substance of your "self-opinionated" claim? It doesn't. So that's another hollow accusation.
No matter what you say LibTard had nothing to go on he was splitting a hair. And nothing will change the fact that YOU are a troll.
As for being "self-opinionated", that's a catch-all phrase that grandstanders can apply to anyone that has ever had an opinion differing from their own. it means nothing and is a hollow insult. meaning you don't know what the hell you are talking about.
I can assure you, I am my own person, not a soc account. That's another hollow accusation from you trying to invalidate what I said.
You think holding an opinion and being "self-opinated" are the same thing? Just a small english lesson to someone who is unable to contextualise language - "self opinionated" is a pejorative term, synonyms including vain,conceited, and narrow-minded. Which kind of sums up HTWW. So no. not a hollow insult. Unlike "libtard". I mean, what is that? Combining the words Liberal and retard? Inspired. How old are you again?
Moron. try to understand context, for maybe the first time in your life. The term "self-opinionated", used in the fashion you employed, can be used applied to anyone with an opinion.
Self-opinionated means sure of one's opinion or stubborn in holding on to that opinion. So anyone on the planet meets that criteria and you idiotic and failed attempt to insult someone was ridiculous and made you look like the fool you are.
It's an extremely hollow insult. It has no value at all.
You don't have to like the term "libtard". Unlike yours, this has meaning and context. And that is liberals retard their thought process. Just like you did with "self-opinionated".
It has become my custom to crack open a beer, kick back with my laptop, and relax while I catch up on HTWW...thanks to your immitation of Barney Frank, the aforementioned beer came out my nose onto my laptop. Just did NOT see that coming. HILARIOUS!
Fascist in Chief thinks Fox News is the enemy... This society giving a prize for sucking has created this limp wristed good for nothing "president".
You criticize him, he starts crying about how they should take over that sector, so lets see, Fox News needs to go away and they want control over the internet.
I hope the NY people don't fall for the lie of throwing your vote away. I would like to see people in office that represent us instead of Rep. like Arlene Spector oh that's right he's a Dem. now. If NY votes her in I wouldn't be suprised if she turns to the Dem. party after. Don't let it happen in NY like in PA. Vote for someone instead of against someone!
Grayson called an agent of the Federal Reserve a K-street whore (not to her face). I don't see why you criticize him for this. It seems perfectly appropriate.
Hey guys and gals! Check out Fall of the Republic by Alex Jones on youtube. It's important that we freedom lovers prepare for the socialization of America!
You know why their too busy busting Fox and us right wingers to deal with Iraq cause you people are the new targets. Wake up your govt has turned on you me all of us. The lib commy's are targeting us.
it wasn't the large amount of golf that bush played that people were outraged about. it was the more than 100 days per year of vacation time he took while in office
I wish Obama would take off a lot more time than he has...unfortunately, he's done enough damage when he's not on the golf course.
I wonder if his game has improved, or if he cheats at the game like Clinton did when he was president. I don't see too much information on the state of his game.
Since his "changes" to the economy, my handicap has sure climbed higher.
the 'handicap' has climbed higher for a lot of people. because the policies and loopholes that allowed people to pervert the economic system and loot people's retirements for their own personal gain are being closed. those people aren't able to make their money the way they have been, and so others are suffering as well.
but still, why talk about how much golf obama is playing? that wasn't the subject of bush's scrutiny. it was his amount of vacation time.
Oh, yeah! That's right, all those pre-Obama politicians, like Barney Frank and the Clinton Regime, that passed all those nice housing bills that enabled the banks that they control to give all that nice money to people who couldn't own the homes they were buying?
You mean all those people? And Like I said, the MORE vacation time for Obama, the better. I hope the guy takes the rest of his 3 years in office to visit his hometown in Hawaii.
you see, this is the perfect example of conservative debate. you start out by talking about the economy, then when reasoned counter point is given, you change the subject. this time its housing. and yes, clinton should shoulder some of the blame. but bush continued the practices because they dovetailed with his 'Ownership Society' goals, and of course congress was strongly behind the push. at that time, the majority of congress was republicans. so stop making it a democrat issue
Actually, I talked about Obama's golf game, and you used the comment to berate us to the "it's Bush's fault" argument.
I simply mentioned that your friends had more to do with economic destruction than Bush did. I was interested to see that you had nothing to say about the game of golf.
Like your political friends, you probably cheat, too.
As for that "Republican control" thing, OK, I'll bite. What have the dems done now that they're firmly in control.
WOW, you have really distorted this conversation. you used the golf game as a metaphor to the decline of your economic situation. don't even pretend otherwise.
and we're not talking about who is who's friends. you have no idea as to my political affiliation, so stop assuming otherwise.
the democrats can't do much because half of them are corrupted. this much is true. but the republicans are getting all the wrong things done because the vast majority of them are in corporate wallets.
people like you make me sad. things don't have to be true or logical for you to believe them. if its something bad against the opposite party, you're all for believing it. when are you people going to realize that this isn't a game. this is about our nation and the continuation of our society. you people refuse to listen to the other side, and instead do whatever you can to shoot them down. why? so you can call yourself a winner? just look at what the victory is costing everyone else. grow up
"things don't have to be true or logical for you to believe them..." You are the BEST example of this quote...no truth, no logic, but believe it anyway...
you can try to flip my own statements against me, and you can continue to try to ignore the fact that our nation has deteriorated sharply over the last decade because of the actions of the previous admin.
but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. there will still be trouble and uncertainty for this nation for years to come, because the extent of bush's corruption has yet to be fully known.
but there's no reasoning with you. you think you know me and what i believe. which is why you are wrong
Again, I commented upon the golf that our president has been playing and how my own handicap has suffered since he was elected.
You can blame Bush all you want, the fact will always remain that DEMOCRATS started this Big State process and there's plenty of visual evidence here on YT showing them defending the rules which they passed with Clinton that created this mess. They passed the rules, defended them, and refused to change them. They OWN this economy!
ok this doesn't make sense then. if the president is playing golf, and now your handicap is suffering, how about you stop talking about politics with your boyfriends while you play? then you won't be so distracted on subjects you don't really know that well.
and its always people like you who will blame current people for problems that have been stemming for years. problems that have always been tehre, and could have been avoided. obama isn't a superhero. he can't fix it in a day
My game is suffering, because I'm working harder to make the ends meet, because Mr. Obama and his buddies are hurting both my golf game and my business.
Let's see...all that Change, was supposed to help all of us, yet, all I see is harder days and a President working on his golf game.
Obama isn't a superhero? Are you sure? He's definitely the savior of all you Socialist Democrat Collectivists.
Hail Obama! Greatest writer since Caesar. Worst golfer since Clinton? So I heard.
this is silly. you go back and forth from your comments about golf from being nothing more than a literal context, to a metaphor to your economic situation. stop jumping around, its hard to see where you are standing. if its harder for you, oh well. its been hard for the majority of americans for so long, and they are finally starting to come back from the crisis that has been ignored for so long.
Oh, that's right, same story: "Republicans are backed by big business." RIGHT! Obama was backed by the bankers on Wall Street, and the UNIONS have only spent $1 BILLION on the past election for their Socialist Democrats, but hey, "business" backs republicans. Did you conveniently forget George Soros?
I DID speak about golf, but since you mentioned it, Obama's golf game seems to improve as the Nation's Game deteriorates.
this coming from no doubt the same group of people who continue to say that they hope obama fails. you'd rather be proven right than to have our nation back on track where it needs to be. instead of bilateral policies and the government working together, you want to stand with your arms crossed while the democrats try to make sense of the herculean task at hand.
its people like you who contribute to the problem. you hate obama more than you love america
Do you know how many people are on welfare? You'd be surprised how few. But you believe that trillions of dollars are spent on people who wont work right? People who are just lazy?
Welfare is a rather small program compared to defense costs. Your party set us up to bankrupt us by giving rich people tax cuts and raising the taxes on middle america. What the hell did you expect?
Trickle down is bullshit, so unless you're a corporate CEO, you shouldn't want him gone.
of course there has to be tax hikes. because people like you don't realize it takes money to make a capitalistic society work. and people like you want to pay less taxes. so iv everyone is paying less money, how we gonna pay for government services?
You see, it's the same old mantra for you pro-slavery collectivists. TAX (steal) from those who create wealth, and give (fense) the proceeds to those who simply live off the system.
You sir, are a Collectivist! A member of the Pro-Slavery Party. If the president fails, America Wins! Because we held back the forces of Socialist Slavery and Darkness.
We are pro-classical Liberal economics based upon the ability of INDIVIDUALS to be FREE from government interference.
You're just an old woman who is crying for more state protections, because you've forsaken your manhood to others. I prefer to rely upon my own abilities rather than SUCK the BLOOD of OTHERS.
i will cry for state protections. they protect us from street criminals, why not business criminals? i can't understand how you still think the government only wants to screw us. the only ones screwing the progress that needs to be made are the republicans
and of course obama will help wall street get back on its feet. for two reasons.
A) it was a greedy few who perversed the market. the majority of them are decent people
B) we're a capitalistic society. the market is the heart of our nation
And this thing about the GOP's website is pretty typical: Republicans spending way too much money on something, big, gaudy, ugly, overblown, and utterly useless... like a miniature version of the $333 MILLION they blew on the McCain/Palin campaign.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! oh man... i laughed for like 2 minutes straight at the barney frank impression- just so unexpected hahahahaha
I LOVE that Grayson called that K Street Whore a K Street Whore! She's a lobbyist who works to defend the secrecy of the Fed's financial shenanigans from public scrutiny, the same way she worked to defend the secrecy of Enron's financial shenanigans from public scrutiny. She has no moral character at all, she sells her services to the highest bidder, and usually to a bunch of crooks and liars. The problem is Grayson didn't go far enough- MOST people in DC are Whores- see P.J. O'Rourke's book.
the golf article link makes no sense, it says that Obama has already played as many games in 10 months as Bush did in 8 years, but then in the next paragraph they say that Bush was at Obama's number at 2 years 9 months
In this case, I don't blame him - what about cussing out the opposition and posting death threats while using sockpuppets to upvote your own comments is in any way conducive to constructive debate?
All of your videos that I've watched so far (and I've watched many) always have a critical point of view. Criticism is all good and well, but don't you ever find anything you agree with? I'm tired of the negativity. This comment has nothing to do with the subject matter of this video.
Obama is a MUCH better golfer than Bush. Period. Also, if you live in Washington, DC you know that almost everyone that works on K ST is a whore. Just a commonly used and accepted term.
You at least give me hope for this nation. I completely understand your feelings of frustration to the point of beating my head against a wall. It seems either one of two things will happen. 1. People will wise up and foresee there soon to be slavery or 2. They will become slaves and have to revolt once they figure that out. Thanks again man for telling it like it is.
Why don't you believe libertarians are at a ten year high? Our civil liberties are being trampled like never before and people are finally waking up to it. That said, a ten year high still isn't near where we need it to be.
It's completely understandable that libertarianism is on the rise. One can be either a liberal or a conservative and still conform to libertarian principles - all that's needed is a recognition that it is not the purpose or place of the federal government to force one's personal agenda or beliefs on the populace at large and a desire for less taxation and control. Given the current direction of our government, it's a demographic shift which is sorely needed if the republic is to survive.
actually, all that is needed is the non-aggression principle. thats why a lot of anarcho-capitalists will say "i used to be a minarchist until i ran out of excuses."
If Barack Obama wanted to make an impression on the public, he would have refused the Nobel Peace farce. If he had a shred of integrity he would have done this. The logical explanation for this is he simply does not deserve it.
1. People didn't attack Bush because he played to much golf, but rather that he took too much time off.
2. Obama has already sent more troops to Afghanistan than Bush ever did. Plus he kept Robert Gates as Defense Secretary. Lay off the man for five seconds.
3. MSNBC = Liberal media outlet. Fox News = Conservative media outlet. Which holds up the banner of "fair and balanced"? Fox can do what it wants as long as it's honest about it's motives.
I think that spending more than half of your term as president on vacation, bringing the economy down to its knees, and starting a war Iraq, scaring people in thinking there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and killing 100,000 Iraq civilians and about 5,000 soldiers is much worse than playing more golf than your predecessor. Especially when there weren't any weapons in the first place. But I guess in your world that is just fine.
Yeah Obama hates Fox news, his ideals are also alien to American. So I take it with a grain of salt. Truth to power how about jobs for welfare recipients.
Val is Rezko in a dress and a hell of a lot worse. Not only is she a slumlord (see Grove Parc), she was down with throwing the poor out of UC emer. rooms, on the board of Kindhearts (look it up if not scrubbed, terror co-conspirators, like Holy Land Foundation), and has her hands in everything. Notice no one has said anything about her saying she personally was glad they got Van. It's not a vetting problem people, it's their circle... and it's a red one.
wow okay so it's okay for fox to attack obama befor he was even president and as he is president but when he fights back thats wrong? God what is wrong with you lot now days!
That's like saying that when a normal person verbally attacks a martial arts expert, then it's ok for the expert to physically attack the first guy. When the press bad-mouths someone, they're offering their opinions (or simple facts). When the president and government attack someone (or "fight back"), they do it with force and legislation. Private citizens don't have that power.
Oh no!? You mean Obama plays golf every Sunday, where Bush played every once and a while and decided to stop altogether in 2003, because he said it would send the wrong message in a time of war?
It would be a nice gesture...you know...if he also didn't take a record amount of vacation time while he wasn't playing golf.
Wasn't that before 9/11? Now we have two wars and a General waiting over 80 days to get some troops while those there are getting killed. He's still fundraising (from bankers, lawyers and big insurance btw), campaigning and globehopping (not to mention the Wednesday night expensive parties), but had only minutes for the general. I know he'd better thank God (or Satan in his case), one of the dead at Dover were not related to me. He probably planted the spouse there, hate to think it though.
Your assuming that because he was at Camp David or the Texas ranch that he was not working. He had all the capability to do his work from both locations and he did that work. Dont be such a closed minded moron. I dont like Bush and thought he was an idiot, but dont speak of things you dont understand.
there is no correlation to barack obama and the death of soldiers in Afghanistan. bush vs obama in golf? bush was never viraly tracked down like obama. Obama should be president of the world. he has the right spirit.
AveolarD 1 year ago
in the beginning stements he makes an outstanding point about obama. He not only wants to be president of the U.S but also the entire world. Well lets see if you can fix the basic problems before you move on to bigger and badder problems.
bbender1986 1 year ago
I wan to hurl after hearing 1:13 of your pathetic opinion and blind view of reality
beachnative420 1 year ago
I hate this ass clown. He's such a pussy because he won't let you comment on his channel without him approving it. He doesn't want everyone exposing his hucksterish economic beliefs. If I could compare his beliefs to something, I would compare him to the "gold tablet reading" and convicted fraud Joseph Smith (see mormon religion).
Newenlightenmentnow 1 year ago
2:36 makes me laugh
bluecobra95 2 years ago
ahaha
Psychopath90 2 years ago
Great video...thanks for the information.
MissMaria10 2 years ago
That prick lifeless loser bigbengamer has been hounding my account and sending me threatening personal messages ever since I stopped commenting on this page. What in the fuck is wrong with that douchebag? Can somebody like help me get him distracted onto somebody else so he stops lying and bragging and threatening me?
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
@Tripo1iSamson LMAO i have not sent one threatening message to you, you lying prick. i don't have to threaten you, when i know you don't have the mentality to have an intelligent conversation. you're a real scumbag, you know. i love how you removed your messages to hide what you said to me. now you can say anything. that's just like fox news washing the transcripts of their shows every day. people like you are a waste of carbon
bigbengamer 2 years ago
in fact, i haven't sent a personal message to you at all. i tried to post a comment on your channel, telling you simply how you should read more from both sides of the spectrum, then you'd have a better understanding of what exactly is going on. but then you had to disapprove that one, and leave your 'intellect' all over my channel. by the way, anyone is free to look at it if they wish. feel free to see what kind of personality this piece of work is trying to hide so he can manipulate you
bigbengamer 2 years ago
a waste of carbon? But carbon is a pollutant killing the planet, at least thats what al the other media outlets are saying/covering.
Now maybe you'll say that not everything fox news says is wrong, but you could at least not post a self contradicting statement like this.
Psychopath90 2 years ago
first of all this conversation was from more than a month ago. second you really believe what they are saying about carbon? how the hell can it be polluting the environment if its the basic building block of the universe? this planet is 4.5 billion years old. people have been on this earth for just under 2 million years. 90% of all species that existed on this planet are extinct. you really think we're gonna kill this planet? it did fine before us, it'll do fine after us. fox is still wrong
bigbengamer 2 years ago
I think i took the "waste of carbon" thing the wrong way, i thought you were saying he was a waste of carbon as in he was a waste of breathe because he is exhaling CO2.
Anway i think that the whole global warming thing is a HUGE scam to achieve political goals, particularly a one world government.
As far as fox news goes, they aren't aren't any worse than any other channel. I'm not going to defend them either. It's all T.V. anyway.
Psychopath90 2 years ago
HTWW, you say they are american citizens exercising their right to the first amendment. but they are journalists. and fox is supposed to be a NEWS AGENCY. news agencies do not have the luxury of exercising their free speech. their job is to provide accurate information, and truth is something fox repeatedly omits, if it doesn't fit into the context they are trying to create. i can understand bias, but when your entire network caters to a political party, its no longer a news agency
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Comment removed
Psychopath90 2 years ago
HTWW, i love how you try to put the blame for the US troop death toll on obama, when that war has been going on for nearly eight years due to the mismanagement and underfunding of the troops by bush. in fact, the same secretary of defense, bill gates, has reissued the budget, with a 9% increase in spending, and most of the funds returned towards conventional warfare, like the armor our troops needed four years ago
bigbengamer 2 years ago
What the fuck does "speak truth to power" mean? Seriously, do the people who use that stupid ,inane , nonsensical phrase realize how stupid they sound? I think the left needs hollow phrases like "choice and competition" or "Truth to power" in lieu of true logical debate. Try speaking english to a fellow american. Try speaking nicely to your local librarian, they might direct you to a book. Maybe Atlas Shrugged. Speak "truth to power" to your pothead, compost smelling, hippie friends.
thetenia 2 years ago
I can't say I am a big fan of Fox news after the 8 years of Bush getting a free ride from them while he shredded the constitution, but it makes me sick to hear people like Jarrett trying to justify abuse of presidential power.
standupgun 2 years ago
Fox news isn't a citizen, it is a network run by citizens with corporate interests (which may or may not conflict with the needs of the majority).
wisdumcube 2 years ago
one thing i agree with you about, HTWW, is that they are private citizens excersizing their right to free speech. that's exactly what fox is doing. so lets stop pretending they are excercising the right to freedom of the press, because their news only follows up on the commentaries of the same station
bigbengamer 2 years ago
hey dude, try this. When I get pulled over, I wish it was me who had a gun and a tazer and the officer who was the pothead. Maybe Democrats should take some fucking business 101 classes and liberals should work blue collar jobs, and some Republicans should smoke dope and obsess over celebrities .
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
Trip:
I got NO problem with what you're saying. Like you, I want the damn government to leave me alone and let me conduct my business honestly; you cannot believe how often I have to deal with their regulators, who screw first and ask questions later. And I'm powerless to do anything about it.
WHERE's MY UNION? when I need one?
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
I know what you mean mayne
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
i got a problem with that. what the hell are you saying? that doesn't make any sense whatsoever
bigbengamer 2 years ago
you got a problem with everything big boy
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
lmao 30k? i charge $500 per hour to design websites, and i could have had a much better version of the gop website up in only five hours. so for $2500 they republican party could have had a quality website. and to think you conservatives elected these people into office. business and accounting should be a requisite for federal elected offices
bigbengamer 2 years ago
big:
I'm an independent. I don't believe in collectivism, you do.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
there you go again. assuming you know what i believe. you think you know me, but you really don't. you can't seem to fill in the gaps without even asking me.
bigbengamer 2 years ago
big:
Fine, you're a moderate, collectivist, socialist, democrat, progressive web designer.
Whatever. As for "conservatives" being Republicans, you got it wrong. Republicans BETTER be Conservatives or they'll be nothing but Democrat Lite, and a perpetual minority party.
You don't understand "conservatism," but when the government controls your business as it does mine, you'll find out for yourself what we stand for.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
and just exactly what is your business?
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big:
I deal in the capital markets; over regulated, over controlled, over policed, and over legislated. AND the ONLY part of it that works is by people like me.
I'm an ex Wall Street who has watched the destruction of my industry and the rest of America by Democrat dirtbags who control the agenda and the Press hamstringing the rest of us, only to be re-elected with the help of the power elite within the community I'm a part of.
The leaders of Wall Street are overwhelmingly Democrat.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
do you ever wonder WHY the leaders of wall street are overwhelmingly democrat? i mean, if the market was truly over regulated, wouldn't they be leaning more to the republicans? or did they just switch sides because the president is a democrat? with the amount of people being screwed out of this, versus the amount of people who are actually benefiting from these regulation(designed to allow small businesses to compete with large corporations), i'd say that these regulations are doing much better
bigbengamer 2 years ago
big:
No, they wouldn't be republicans. The CURRENT STATE of WALL STREET, The FED, Housing, The SEC, FINRA, you name it, is as a direct result of DEMOCRAT control of government.
And YOU WOULD say that about small business, because you think republicans are PRO-Big Business, and that's where you're being a sucker, because Big Business likes Big Government, hence Democrat Control.
Wise up, smart guy.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
ok i'm really confused by what you are saying. democrats over regulate the very big businesses that love them for it? this is a contradictory in your argument. a major one. of the majority of big business are dems, and the dems are slapping all these regs on the market, why are you even bothering to be in wall street? or is it the republicans that over regulate? of that's so, why are you against the democrats?
bigbengamer 2 years ago
big:
It's obvious you really don't know how Wall Street or Main Street operates. Big business obtains protections from regulations that minimize competition, they can afford the attorneys and internal regulators to meet government regulation nonsense, small business cannot.
So, Big Business has a vested interest in regulations. Democrats are pro Big Business, Big Unions, Big Government.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
i'm spotting yet another major contradiction. you are saying that big business obtains protection from regulations that would otherwise MINIMIZE competition? why would big businesses not want to minimize competition? that means more profits for them. and if big business has a vested interest in regulations, shouldn't you been mad at them for allowing you to be so heavily regulated? why hate the government if your boss is allowing it to happen? your venting is grossly misplaced
bigbengamer 2 years ago
It was those darn religious types that forced lending institutions to lend indiscriminately and riskily, it's those religious people who spread STD's, drug use, violence, all that stuff, huh? Like those Christian inner-city Chicago gang members who killed that kid with a railroad tie. Oh wait....
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
wow are you blowing this out of proportion! what the hell did anyone say about religion? we've been talking about the economy. please get out of this conversation. what little relevant information to the subject at hand here is clouded with its lack of logic
bigbengamer 2 years ago
I can read your comments and comment on them the same as anyone else, mayne. That's the curse of going around on youtube and showing off how little you know about things like personal responsibility, independence, self-sufficiency, reliability, etc, but rather entitlements, free stuff, video games, a constant government mom to make your sandwiches for you when you live in your government housing apartment and watch shitty redundant news channels that all reinforce the same ideas. Awesome.
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
the only ones here showing off their abundance of ignorance is you and your boyfriend, El Capitan. why don't you go practice playing golf together, you can hide in the sand trap and stroke each other's clubs
bigbengamer 2 years ago
yeah, when I'm not doing that I'm busy owning a business that will gross more than $50,000 in it's first year.
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
wow, that's all? i did double than when i went into business for myself. and all i had to do was sit in this chair and type code. well it wasn't this chair. i've had four since then.
bigbengamer 2 years ago
And bigben you haven't spotted any contradictions in what captain has been saying, you're just announcing assumptions in a bombastic manner. There are some businesses that stand to gain from relying on the government while there are some that stand to gain via deregulation. Nobody's "venting" is "misplaced," rather, our economic giants all the way down to the small businessman and women in this country are footing the fill for government waste and for lazy people, like most liberal teenagers.
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
And bigben, if you'd ever looked up how a corporation works, there is majority representation and voting to be done, theoretically, and that in NAME is a DEMOCRATIC practice, though not OF the democrat party. Get it, idiot? And there are democrat businesspeople, it's not black and white.
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
I wonder if any democrat has ever grown any killer indoor
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
so your profession isn't in demand anymore. you think computer science was my first choice? did i mention yet that i also have a degree in avionics, and i have a private pilot's license, WITH a multi engine rating? i started when i was 18, and i got my degree just after 9/11. by then flying wasn't as popular as it used to be because someone flew a plane into your building, and i my job offers were rescinded with 35k in tuition to pay. but i found a way to succeed. so stop crying
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big: I never said my profession isn't in demand. The issue is NOT my profession, but the REGULATORS who control it.
I'm not crying, I'm observing that what people like you believe is nothing but more nonsense. REGULATION does not work. And history is on my side in this argument. Obama is PRO Big Government and Collectivism, and he must fail for America to succeed. The world is a massive plase of immense competition, I'm not afraid of that, I'm afraid of the slavery that Obama is in favor of.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
by your argument, keeping a rabid dog in a cage is over regulating. even though the people are safe from it, it violates the dog's freedom of expression. even bush had mentioned on several occasions how wall street was out of control. yet regulations designed to recover that control of the market, in order to monitor the means and ethics of people's systems of prospering in wall street, are not what the market needs. well then i ask you, since you are an expert. what exactly is it that we need?
bigbengamer 2 years ago
i didn't think you'd be able to back up your argument. its nice to know you at least bugged off
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big:
I'm working too jerk off.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
Big:
My argument is that The People are able to shoot a rabid dog more quickly than the government can regulate the rabid dog from existence.
Wall Street was not "out of control." Wall Street has been operating within the regulation parameters established by Congress and its regulating bodies. This is why NO ONE has gone to jail, and the people who created this mess, are still in charge.
Are you such a dupe that you cannot see who's behind this fiasco? There's info right her on YT.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
big:
Lastly, I can show you tons of statistics: Regulations, the FED, the SEC, & the Gov't do not work.
What works? I'll tell you, INDIVIDUALS who take responsibility for themselves and their money, work.
People would never invest in items that they didn't understand without the regulators saying that they approved the investments.
No Gov't; No Investors; No Investors; No Money; No Money; No Disaster.
Gov't is not the solution, it's the problem.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
that's like saying the only thing that works in a storage facility is people being honest enough not to steal your stuff there. in order to keep an honest man honest, you have to keep a lock on your door. the same principle applies to the market. regulations are needed to keep dishonest and otherwise honest people from creating the pandemic that is now our economic situation. you make rules for your kids, don't you? you make sure that your rules for them are to ensure their safety, right?
bigbengamer 2 years ago
big:
Oh really? That's why we've gone from crises to crises SINCE the advent of The Federal Reserve?
So since government has screwed up by the numbers for 100 years now, we need MORE Government.
You know, you are a complete fool. Stick with the internet, it's obvious, you're not too smart. Thank God, you don't fly planes for a living.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
i completely agree with you. the federal reserve is the primary problem with our economy. this country was founded on two main principles: no religion in government, and no central bank. politics, from both sides of the aisle, has flooded this country with both. however, we're not talking about the central bank. we're talking about the economy and the market and how the dems are regulating corps that love them. and if you must know, i'm an excellent pilot. but please stay on topic
bigbengamer 2 years ago
and for god's sake, answer my question on how the major corporations can be mostly democratic if they complain that the democrats are over regulating them. you contradicted yourself, and you keep trying to change the subject to avert your answering this. you painted yourself into a corner and i'm not letting you go until you justify why you said two completely different things
bigbengamer 2 years ago
you think it's "religion" in government and the federal reserve that's entirely responsible for America's current problems? Interesting, though it shouldn't even hold up in a high school argument paper.
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
captaindiesalot you can't reason with people that don't understand the basic economic principles their lives operate under, much less their culture, preservation, right to exist, right to earn, etc, etc. It seems like a lot of Americans and people in the developed are willing to throw it all away for government programs, housing, and that terrible, dangerous thing that environmorons want, deindustrialization. These people should get paid not to share their ideas for the sake of humanity.
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
in the developed world*
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
then you'd complain that we are getting something for nothing. people like you just don't seem to understand how complex the situation is. its more complex than i can completely decipher. but i'm not pretending to know all of the answers. i'm criticizing someone else for acting like he does, and saying "for america to succeed, obama has to fail". well the last eight years of bush was no success. it was a total failure. and america has been failing ever since. and he was even on your side
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Most likely for my business to succeed, the leftist tendency of every few presidencies in this country needs to stop. And the last eight years of Bush "was no success"? Okay, why? Cuz he wasn't liked? Because we're in a war that's possibly in our best interest? Yes, what a bastard! At least Obama had the amazing courage to go around the world and apologize to dictators and suck up to Saudi Arabian Wahhabists and then say thanks for not insulting him directly, only his country.
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
which was is in our best interest? the war in afghanistan, where after eight years, we still have an unstable situation there? or the war in iraq, which had nothing to do with 9/11 and after six+ years, is still an unstable situation? the only interests that are being satisfied with those wars are the defense contractors, which most of our debt is going to now.
i've nothing more to say to you. you cannot provide a reasoned argument of your own. you are having to use someone else's
bigbengamer 2 years ago
And "people like me" would complain about getting something for nothing? No, more like I'd be pissed about having to provide any employees I may have with insurance while not making enough for myself. So fuck your argument.
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
without regulations, people could still buy all the cough syrup they wanted to keep making meth. they can keep receiving student loans, then filing bankruptcy so they don't have to pay them back. they can keep having more children so welfare will pay them more each month. regulations are necessary in every aspect of life, because sadly we aren't as honest and disciplined as you think. we aren't japanese, you know.
bigbengamer 2 years ago
but you still didn't answer my question. how can bigt business love the democrats, when they are the ones putting all these regulations on them? how is it that they can lick the hand that isn't feeding them? how can your argument contradict itself and still be logical? i'm waiting for your response...
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big:
"Conservatives" do NOT believe in government. We believe in less government, lower taxes, less regulation, less spending on horseshit domestic programs that don't work, we believe in National Defense; defense of borders, the de-funding of the UN.
We think Capitalism is good and Collectivism is a Fucking disaster. You're a website designer, well, how would you like it if I told you NOTHING you do can be published without MY approval? Welcome to MY business, asshole.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
Comment removed
bigbengamer 2 years ago
you mean the bill about net neutrality? yeah, typical argument from someone who'd rather be right even if they aren't correct. i've read the bill, because i make good money on the internet. and there is nothing in it that scares me. if there was anything about that bill that suggested that it would hinder my ability to maintain my income, i'd be agreeing with you in this.
bigbengamer 2 years ago
big:
who said anything about Net neutrality? The government regulates EVERYTHING I do, and it's completely unfair, expensive, and DOESN'T work, but meely mouthed people like you say "businessmen" need to be policed.
Fuck off, I've NEVER screwed a client in my life, if I did I'd be out of business very quickly.
You deal with bullshit websites, I deal with REAL people who rely upon my skills for the security of their lives.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
please stop with the profanity. i have respected you enough to not swear at you, even though your lack of logic tries my patience. just answer my question: what is your business?
bigbengamer 2 years ago
and then classes for web designers to not brag
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
god i hate computer science students. they think because they learned something about web design, they are the only ones who know. they act like air force fighter pilots with their level of arrogance. what i hate the most about them is that i used to be the same way when i was a student haha
bigbengamer 2 years ago
I read the whole Grayson thing. Yeah... that woman is a whore.
As for his attack on Republicans, that's ironic since he attacked the lobbyist calling her a whore in defense of the Audit the Fed bill... which was written by a Republican...
DoomHippie 2 years ago
jackass
carrierexchange 2 years ago
Love the Barney Frank impression.
funkymonkey1930 2 years ago
Barney Frank and Ralph Nader?! IN A DEBATE?! GOD HELP US ALL!!!
b0bzm00s3 2 years ago
HowTheWorldWorks, while I seriously disagree with your political ideology, I enjoy your videos very much. You are a very good public speaker and entertainer.
ThaWhiz 2 years ago
Grayson roflowns republicans and democrats.
Hes actually on our side, and that bitch is a whore.
You suck.
Bigbossjin 2 years ago
yeah she is a whore
The LOBBYIST for the FEDERAL RESERVE.... can you get worse than that lmao
I'd call her a lot worse
elitebanktyranny 2 years ago
I enjoy your videos, however you still fail to realize that the game isn't republicans against democrats. At the very top they are both evil and work together against the interests of "we the people". Once you wake up to this reality you will be a force for truth. Until then, you are just as bad a propagandist for the lesser of two evils.
hula4483 2 years ago
Where's the correlation between bashing republicans and the death toll in afghanistan? Just curious.
Derokos 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Liberal Viewer Kicking your ass on your own video thread again?
MrSyrett 2 years ago
Not even close Libtard hasn't got a leg to stand on here and HTWW doesn't need to refute such an obviously flawed argument. There are many willing to show you, LiberalViewer, and his many vote bots how wrong you are.
....as always....
sorrian 2 years ago
"HTWW doesn't need to refute such an obviously flawed argument.............there are many willing to show you how wrong you are" - nice contradictory logic. But seriously, a debater that "doesn't need" to respond to an arguement put to him? Sort of missing the point of being a self-opinionated fucktard isnt it? I'll just assume Im responding to one of HTWW's many soc accounts.
MrSyrett 2 years ago
Yet another post from you that makes no sense and has no bearing on anything.
it isn't contradictory, you just can't comprehend the perspective. Massive FAIL on your part and here's why:
The argument wasn't valid. HTWW has no need to reply to nonsense allegations that change nothing. LibTard was trying to split a hair and create a straw man argument. There are more than enough HTWW followers to point that out to him and you.
sorrian 2 years ago
And it is contradictory. You cannot find a direct quote where Jarrett said they're "attacking Fox News because the White House believes in speaking truth to power. But then you say there are plenty of people willing to show you how wrong you are..........still waiting.
Hollow accusation? Like accusing people of having a different viewpoint from you as being a votebot? HTWW has a proven tract record for having soc accounts. So it isnt a hollow accusation at all, Failbot.
MrSyrett 2 years ago
You can't find a direct quote where they called out someone else other than Fox since Obama sent out the Mao-loving goosestepper, Anita Dunn.
Like LibTard, you fail to understand simple concepts like context and subject matter. The subject matter was FNC bias when she made the comment. The context was her defense of only calling out FNC when confrinted with the question of MSNBC.
Like accusing people that have a different point of view as "self-opinionated?
sorrian 2 years ago
Just because you are unwilling to accept the truth that you were wrong doesn't change the fact...that you were wrong. Refusal to admit it is not exoneration.
How would soc accounts prove substance of your "self-opinionated" claim? It doesn't. So that's another hollow accusation.
No matter what you say LibTard had nothing to go on he was splitting a hair. And nothing will change the fact that YOU are a troll.
sorrian 2 years ago
As for being "self-opinionated", that's a catch-all phrase that grandstanders can apply to anyone that has ever had an opinion differing from their own. it means nothing and is a hollow insult. meaning you don't know what the hell you are talking about.
I can assure you, I am my own person, not a soc account. That's another hollow accusation from you trying to invalidate what I said.
You fail.
sorrian 2 years ago
You think holding an opinion and being "self-opinated" are the same thing? Just a small english lesson to someone who is unable to contextualise language - "self opinionated" is a pejorative term, synonyms including vain,conceited, and narrow-minded. Which kind of sums up HTWW. So no. not a hollow insult. Unlike "libtard". I mean, what is that? Combining the words Liberal and retard? Inspired. How old are you again?
MrSyrett 2 years ago
Comment removed
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
Comment removed
Tripo1iSamson 2 years ago
Moron. try to understand context, for maybe the first time in your life. The term "self-opinionated", used in the fashion you employed, can be used applied to anyone with an opinion.
Self-opinionated means sure of one's opinion or stubborn in holding on to that opinion. So anyone on the planet meets that criteria and you idiotic and failed attempt to insult someone was ridiculous and made you look like the fool you are.
sorrian 2 years ago
It's an extremely hollow insult. It has no value at all.
You don't have to like the term "libtard". Unlike yours, this has meaning and context. And that is liberals retard their thought process. Just like you did with "self-opinionated".
sorrian 2 years ago
It has become my custom to crack open a beer, kick back with my laptop, and relax while I catch up on HTWW...thanks to your immitation of Barney Frank, the aforementioned beer came out my nose onto my laptop. Just did NOT see that coming. HILARIOUS!
JimmyzToo 2 years ago
Lol, terrific video.
BryanShotYou 2 years ago
Fascist in Chief thinks Fox News is the enemy... This society giving a prize for sucking has created this limp wristed good for nothing "president".
You criticize him, he starts crying about how they should take over that sector, so lets see, Fox News needs to go away and they want control over the internet.
Nah, he's not a Fascist...
Jethro212 2 years ago
I hope the NY people don't fall for the lie of throwing your vote away. I would like to see people in office that represent us instead of Rep. like Arlene Spector oh that's right he's a Dem. now. If NY votes her in I wouldn't be suprised if she turns to the Dem. party after. Don't let it happen in NY like in PA. Vote for someone instead of against someone!
sds7508 2 years ago
Thumper Alert!
Johnknee1000 2 years ago
I wonder if that has anything to do with his appointing all those Tsars?
Just wait 'till people start calling him Divus Brackus. =)
NobodyImportant2008 2 years ago
Grayson called an agent of the Federal Reserve a K-street whore (not to her face). I don't see why you criticize him for this. It seems perfectly appropriate.
scott715 2 years ago
Oh Obama can choose winners and losers in the economy, the democrats have been doing it for 80 years.
LokiScoutSniper 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I feel sorry for this guy. You know his mouth at one point was a safe haven for battered pen!ses.
P00pinaGr00p 2 years ago
She did work at the Federal Reserve. that does make her a whore, just like the rest of them at the Fed
CROCK3 2 years ago
Hey guys and gals! Check out Fall of the Republic by Alex Jones on youtube. It's important that we freedom lovers prepare for the socialization of America!
jaimekid 2 years ago
oh the dems are in order there just agreeing with the conservatives of course lets see how things are post voting day
ibigdog 2 years ago
You know why their too busy busting Fox and us right wingers to deal with Iraq cause you people are the new targets. Wake up your govt has turned on you me all of us. The lib commy's are targeting us.
Shadyac21 2 years ago
Great work man!!!
psnsam 2 years ago
GREAT!
24602400 2 years ago
it wasn't the large amount of golf that bush played that people were outraged about. it was the more than 100 days per year of vacation time he took while in office
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big:
I wish Obama would take off a lot more time than he has...unfortunately, he's done enough damage when he's not on the golf course.
I wonder if his game has improved, or if he cheats at the game like Clinton did when he was president. I don't see too much information on the state of his game.
Since his "changes" to the economy, my handicap has sure climbed higher.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
the 'handicap' has climbed higher for a lot of people. because the policies and loopholes that allowed people to pervert the economic system and loot people's retirements for their own personal gain are being closed. those people aren't able to make their money the way they have been, and so others are suffering as well.
but still, why talk about how much golf obama is playing? that wasn't the subject of bush's scrutiny. it was his amount of vacation time.
bigbengamer 2 years ago
big:
Oh, yeah! That's right, all those pre-Obama politicians, like Barney Frank and the Clinton Regime, that passed all those nice housing bills that enabled the banks that they control to give all that nice money to people who couldn't own the homes they were buying?
You mean all those people? And Like I said, the MORE vacation time for Obama, the better. I hope the guy takes the rest of his 3 years in office to visit his hometown in Hawaii.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
you see, this is the perfect example of conservative debate. you start out by talking about the economy, then when reasoned counter point is given, you change the subject. this time its housing. and yes, clinton should shoulder some of the blame. but bush continued the practices because they dovetailed with his 'Ownership Society' goals, and of course congress was strongly behind the push. at that time, the majority of congress was republicans. so stop making it a democrat issue
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big:
Actually, I talked about Obama's golf game, and you used the comment to berate us to the "it's Bush's fault" argument.
I simply mentioned that your friends had more to do with economic destruction than Bush did. I was interested to see that you had nothing to say about the game of golf.
Like your political friends, you probably cheat, too.
As for that "Republican control" thing, OK, I'll bite. What have the dems done now that they're firmly in control.
Oh, NOTHING! I get it: CHANGE
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
WOW, you have really distorted this conversation. you used the golf game as a metaphor to the decline of your economic situation. don't even pretend otherwise.
and we're not talking about who is who's friends. you have no idea as to my political affiliation, so stop assuming otherwise.
the democrats can't do much because half of them are corrupted. this much is true. but the republicans are getting all the wrong things done because the vast majority of them are in corporate wallets.
bigbengamer 2 years ago
people like you make me sad. things don't have to be true or logical for you to believe them. if its something bad against the opposite party, you're all for believing it. when are you people going to realize that this isn't a game. this is about our nation and the continuation of our society. you people refuse to listen to the other side, and instead do whatever you can to shoot them down. why? so you can call yourself a winner? just look at what the victory is costing everyone else. grow up
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Comment removed
crazymotherpro 2 years ago
big:
"things don't have to be true or logical for you to believe them..." You are the BEST example of this quote...no truth, no logic, but believe it anyway...
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
you can try to flip my own statements against me, and you can continue to try to ignore the fact that our nation has deteriorated sharply over the last decade because of the actions of the previous admin.
but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. there will still be trouble and uncertainty for this nation for years to come, because the extent of bush's corruption has yet to be fully known.
but there's no reasoning with you. you think you know me and what i believe. which is why you are wrong
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big:
Again, I commented upon the golf that our president has been playing and how my own handicap has suffered since he was elected.
You can blame Bush all you want, the fact will always remain that DEMOCRATS started this Big State process and there's plenty of visual evidence here on YT showing them defending the rules which they passed with Clinton that created this mess. They passed the rules, defended them, and refused to change them. They OWN this economy!
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
ok this doesn't make sense then. if the president is playing golf, and now your handicap is suffering, how about you stop talking about politics with your boyfriends while you play? then you won't be so distracted on subjects you don't really know that well.
and its always people like you who will blame current people for problems that have been stemming for years. problems that have always been tehre, and could have been avoided. obama isn't a superhero. he can't fix it in a day
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big,
My game is suffering, because I'm working harder to make the ends meet, because Mr. Obama and his buddies are hurting both my golf game and my business.
Let's see...all that Change, was supposed to help all of us, yet, all I see is harder days and a President working on his golf game.
Obama isn't a superhero? Are you sure? He's definitely the savior of all you Socialist Democrat Collectivists.
Hail Obama! Greatest writer since Caesar. Worst golfer since Clinton? So I heard.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
this is silly. you go back and forth from your comments about golf from being nothing more than a literal context, to a metaphor to your economic situation. stop jumping around, its hard to see where you are standing. if its harder for you, oh well. its been hard for the majority of americans for so long, and they are finally starting to come back from the crisis that has been ignored for so long.
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big:
Oh, that's right, same story: "Republicans are backed by big business." RIGHT! Obama was backed by the bankers on Wall Street, and the UNIONS have only spent $1 BILLION on the past election for their Socialist Democrats, but hey, "business" backs republicans. Did you conveniently forget George Soros?
I DID speak about golf, but since you mentioned it, Obama's golf game seems to improve as the Nation's Game deteriorates.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
this coming from no doubt the same group of people who continue to say that they hope obama fails. you'd rather be proven right than to have our nation back on track where it needs to be. instead of bilateral policies and the government working together, you want to stand with your arms crossed while the democrats try to make sense of the herculean task at hand.
its people like you who contribute to the problem. you hate obama more than you love america
bigbengamer 2 years ago
BIG:
YOU FUCKING BET I want this asshole, collectivist, socialist, Pro-Slavery jerkoff to fail.
You want to be a slave, fine, I want freedom. I don't want to have slime like you living off my hard earned assets.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
Do you know how many people are on welfare? You'd be surprised how few. But you believe that trillions of dollars are spent on people who wont work right? People who are just lazy?
Welfare is a rather small program compared to defense costs. Your party set us up to bankrupt us by giving rich people tax cuts and raising the taxes on middle america. What the hell did you expect?
Trickle down is bullshit, so unless you're a corporate CEO, you shouldn't want him gone.
snoman99991 2 years ago
snoman:
"Trickle down is bullshit..." Oh, really? That's why the Reagan-Bush years represented only 18 to 20 million new jobs?
Yet, in a lousy 8 months, this guy has cost us 3 million?
Sure! Your belief in socialist economics is a HUGE success! Spend, spend, spend...tax, tax, tax...regulate, regulate, regulate.
Really, sick with building snowmen.
Tax hike on the middle class? Where? show me where? You're another fool.
The only tax hikes I see are from the Democrats.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
of course there has to be tax hikes. because people like you don't realize it takes money to make a capitalistic society work. and people like you want to pay less taxes. so iv everyone is paying less money, how we gonna pay for government services?
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big:
You see, it's the same old mantra for you pro-slavery collectivists. TAX (steal) from those who create wealth, and give (fense) the proceeds to those who simply live off the system.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
you, sir, are a moron. if the president fails, the nation falls. get out of politics before you kill our constitution.
bigbengamer 2 years ago
Big:
You sir, are a Collectivist! A member of the Pro-Slavery Party. If the president fails, America Wins! Because we held back the forces of Socialist Slavery and Darkness.
We are pro-classical Liberal economics based upon the ability of INDIVIDUALS to be FREE from government interference.
You're just an old woman who is crying for more state protections, because you've forsaken your manhood to others. I prefer to rely upon my own abilities rather than SUCK the BLOOD of OTHERS.
captaindiesalot 2 years ago
i will cry for state protections. they protect us from street criminals, why not business criminals? i can't understand how you still think the government only wants to screw us. the only ones screwing the progress that needs to be made are the republicans
and of course obama will help wall street get back on its feet. for two reasons.
A) it was a greedy few who perversed the market. the majority of them are decent people
B) we're a capitalistic society. the market is the heart of our nation
bigbengamer 2 years ago
And this thing about the GOP's website is pretty typical: Republicans spending way too much money on something, big, gaudy, ugly, overblown, and utterly useless... like a miniature version of the $333 MILLION they blew on the McCain/Palin campaign.
littlebier8 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! oh man... i laughed for like 2 minutes straight at the barney frank impression- just so unexpected hahahahaha
littlebier8 2 years ago
I LOVE that Grayson called that K Street Whore a K Street Whore! She's a lobbyist who works to defend the secrecy of the Fed's financial shenanigans from public scrutiny, the same way she worked to defend the secrecy of Enron's financial shenanigans from public scrutiny. She has no moral character at all, she sells her services to the highest bidder, and usually to a bunch of crooks and liars. The problem is Grayson didn't go far enough- MOST people in DC are Whores- see P.J. O'Rourke's book.
littlebier8 2 years ago
the golf article link makes no sense, it says that Obama has already played as many games in 10 months as Bush did in 8 years, but then in the next paragraph they say that Bush was at Obama's number at 2 years 9 months
MustardMan7321 2 years ago
wow.. you deleted jesus's comments. you must really hate god, lee
MajFrankBurns 2 years ago
In this case, I don't blame him - what about cussing out the opposition and posting death threats while using sockpuppets to upvote your own comments is in any way conducive to constructive debate?
FreemanicParacusia 2 years ago 2
Obama, Valerie Jarrett, David Axelrod, Van Jones, and others in the Whitehouse are all COMMUNISTS!
Not Socialists... COMMIES like Red China Mao Communists!
Go see some videos on China's rulers ordering soldiers to murders their own people.
Is THIS what our country has come to?
You better go buy a gun and lot's of ammo before it's too late!
NewChristianSoldiers 2 years ago
This is the signal most scariest comment I have ever seen. Stop promoting violence. Haven't enough people died do to these types of fear mongering?
supersummersalts 2 years ago
All of your videos that I've watched so far (and I've watched many) always have a critical point of view. Criticism is all good and well, but don't you ever find anything you agree with? I'm tired of the negativity. This comment has nothing to do with the subject matter of this video.
psilynt1 2 years ago
Obama is a MUCH better golfer than Bush. Period. Also, if you live in Washington, DC you know that almost everyone that works on K ST is a whore. Just a commonly used and accepted term.
MichaelFalcone 2 years ago
Obama is a MUCH better golfer than Bush. Period.
MichaelFalcone 2 years ago
Love the Barney Frank impression, ha!
loszhor 2 years ago
Katie Couric sucks...uh at least I hope so. for somebodys sake anyway.
lancechamplain 2 years ago
great video today.
oiuoiu988 2 years ago
You at least give me hope for this nation. I completely understand your feelings of frustration to the point of beating my head against a wall. It seems either one of two things will happen. 1. People will wise up and foresee there soon to be slavery or 2. They will become slaves and have to revolt once they figure that out. Thanks again man for telling it like it is.
onesoul2give 2 years ago
Why don't you believe libertarians are at a ten year high? Our civil liberties are being trampled like never before and people are finally waking up to it. That said, a ten year high still isn't near where we need it to be.
waste234 2 years ago
its obviously the case idk why he doesnt believe it either.
oiuoiu988 2 years ago
It's completely understandable that libertarianism is on the rise. One can be either a liberal or a conservative and still conform to libertarian principles - all that's needed is a recognition that it is not the purpose or place of the federal government to force one's personal agenda or beliefs on the populace at large and a desire for less taxation and control. Given the current direction of our government, it's a demographic shift which is sorely needed if the republic is to survive.
FreemanicParacusia 2 years ago
actually, all that is needed is the non-aggression principle. thats why a lot of anarcho-capitalists will say "i used to be a minarchist until i ran out of excuses."
oiuoiu988 2 years ago
If Barack Obama wanted to make an impression on the public, he would have refused the Nobel Peace farce. If he had a shred of integrity he would have done this. The logical explanation for this is he simply does not deserve it.
tomtcf76 2 years ago
1. People didn't attack Bush because he played to much golf, but rather that he took too much time off.
2. Obama has already sent more troops to Afghanistan than Bush ever did. Plus he kept Robert Gates as Defense Secretary. Lay off the man for five seconds.
3. MSNBC = Liberal media outlet. Fox News = Conservative media outlet. Which holds up the banner of "fair and balanced"? Fox can do what it wants as long as it's honest about it's motives.
fai1t0liv3 2 years ago
I respectfully disagree... News casters/stations should not have "motives". They should tell us the news, not their opinions.
tumadros 2 years ago
I think that spending more than half of your term as president on vacation, bringing the economy down to its knees, and starting a war Iraq, scaring people in thinking there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and killing 100,000 Iraq civilians and about 5,000 soldiers is much worse than playing more golf than your predecessor. Especially when there weren't any weapons in the first place. But I guess in your world that is just fine.
hitman1365 2 years ago
thank ron paul for the libertarian stat
itoldyounolies 2 years ago
Yeah Obama hates Fox news, his ideals are also alien to American. So I take it with a grain of salt. Truth to power how about jobs for welfare recipients.
LokiScoutSniper 2 years ago
Val is Rezko in a dress and a hell of a lot worse. Not only is she a slumlord (see Grove Parc), she was down with throwing the poor out of UC emer. rooms, on the board of Kindhearts (look it up if not scrubbed, terror co-conspirators, like Holy Land Foundation), and has her hands in everything. Notice no one has said anything about her saying she personally was glad they got Van. It's not a vetting problem people, it's their circle... and it's a red one.
averitas 2 years ago
wow okay so it's okay for fox to attack obama befor he was even president and as he is president but when he fights back thats wrong? God what is wrong with you lot now days!
SeanOgoD86 2 years ago
That's like saying that when a normal person verbally attacks a martial arts expert, then it's ok for the expert to physically attack the first guy. When the press bad-mouths someone, they're offering their opinions (or simple facts). When the president and government attack someone (or "fight back"), they do it with force and legislation. Private citizens don't have that power.
ecsheats 2 years ago
(This last post was in response to
SeanOgoD86's comment.)
ecsheats 2 years ago
Obama speaking truth to power is like the devil speaking praise to god. What a joke.
bbburton 2 years ago
Oh no!? You mean Obama plays golf every Sunday, where Bush played every once and a while and decided to stop altogether in 2003, because he said it would send the wrong message in a time of war?
It would be a nice gesture...you know...if he also didn't take a record amount of vacation time while he wasn't playing golf.
DashCat9 2 years ago
Comment removed
DashCat9 2 years ago
To be clear. People criticized him for taking too much vacation time, not for playing too much golf.
DashCat9 2 years ago
Wasn't that before 9/11? Now we have two wars and a General waiting over 80 days to get some troops while those there are getting killed. He's still fundraising (from bankers, lawyers and big insurance btw), campaigning and globehopping (not to mention the Wednesday night expensive parties), but had only minutes for the general. I know he'd better thank God (or Satan in his case), one of the dead at Dover were not related to me. He probably planted the spouse there, hate to think it though.
averitas 2 years ago
Nope. Bush continued to take record vacation time after 9/11. Look it up.
Globetrotting? I'm assuming you're referring to the trips abroad Obama has taken to foster...diplomacy.
Not going to even dignify the Satan reference with a response.
DashCat9 2 years ago
Your assuming that because he was at Camp David or the Texas ranch that he was not working. He had all the capability to do his work from both locations and he did that work. Dont be such a closed minded moron. I dont like Bush and thought he was an idiot, but dont speak of things you dont understand.
MrBoredatwork 2 years ago 2
buuuuut seriously, Sarah Palin and Rush Limbaugh are both huge liabilities and embarrassments.
bwelkk 2 years ago
1:06 to 1:11. Have you ever read 1984?
doddsoreric 2 years ago
5 stars. Yes, the website should be 'trendy' and 'cool'. Should also have plenty of FAQ's to compare political points