This product has simply pushed my photography into a Fantastic new direction. Amazing system for on location shoots, small and light weight. wayneleetaylorphotography
Even though this is a commercial I still love how it gives enough technical detail instead of being just image selling like 99.9% of modern commercials are.
Great product line. I like the reliability and construction of the PW over third party wireless controllers. You do get what you pay for. Thing I don't understand is how people use the cheaper "eBay style " triggers on their pro level DSLRs?
I can't wait to try out the Flex and Mini for the Nikon. I've had good results with the Plus IIs in my Canon system in the past.
I'm planning to buy the MiniTT1 and the FlexTT5 so i can use them with 4 studio flashes from the AlienBee company using the AC9 AlienBees Adapter. The questions are: can i control 4 flashes or more? Can i moderate manually the intensity of light that i want in each flash independently? and will the MiniTT1 will take the reading automatically?
I was just at wppi for the last two days here in Las Vegas. I spoke directly with the company regarding these products. They told me that honestly they would buy all flex TT5's rather than buying a MiniTT1. For the 20 bucks difference it makes sense as the TT5 can be both a transmitter and a receiver where the TT1 can only transmit. Yes you can use the flashes in manual mode. The mini TT1 does not read anything, it just transmits data from your camera, which is what reads.
This is the system that I use and I have been fairly happy with it - aside from the issues with RF interference using the 580 line of flashes (which PW addressed by giving out the RF soft-shield at no cost last year), I've been pretty content with the system. Admittedly, I've had it fail to fire a few times and the TT1 seems to eat thru batteries faster than I'd like. I really want to try an AC3 ZoneController... would make my style of portrait shoots much easier. @Tom - the prices are fair.
So If I read correctly, everything is fixed right now for the Canon Flashs. So I'll have no problem with my 580EXII and my two 550 EX. So If I want to be well equiped I need to get 2 mini TT1 and 1 Flex TT5.
@sTiNkYkIlLeR Original bench testing and prototype testing did provide some amazing distances. PocketWizard has had problems with the RF noise generated by some Canon flash units and has spent great time and capitol to contain the problem. The AC5 and AC7 were developed to combat the distance limiting noise and have been quite successful. Please see tests done by Rob Galbraith here: robgalbraithDOTcom/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-10050-10598 (continued)
@sTiNkYkIlLeR Thanks for asking! Selection of the best radio frequency to use for PocketWizard radios was well studied by LPA-PocketWizard when they started designing the PocketWizard system. Larger radio waves, lower numbers, can penetrate walls and work around and under things better than higher frequencies. Extreme example: The US Navy uses ultra low waves that enable talking to submarines on the other side of the world. (con't)
@sTiNkYkIlLeR The frequency that is used by PocketWizards has very little competition which is vital to good communication. Other available frequencies such as 900Mhz are now being heavily populated by industry and municipal government communications. And 2.4Ghz is crowded with WiFi, cellphone and many other forms of communication. The major problem that PocketWizard faced with the Canon system was ineffective RF shielding of some of the Canon flashes. (con't)
@sTiNkYkIlLeR We have since found ways to shield the noise produced by them. Also, the newer Canon 430EXII is well shielded and works wonderfully well with the Mini and Flex. The new Nikon system PocketWizard radios are just coming to market. Nikon flashes have properly shielded circuitry and we believe that the MiniTT1 and FlexTT5 for Nikon will be greatly appreciated and very popular. (con't)
@sTiNkYkIlLeR We are big fans of TriCoast Photography for the excellent education they provide to the photography community. Besides being innovative and fun, they are a great bunch of guys. Unfortunately, the RF shielding was not available for their tests. And holding a radio will not make the body holding it part of the antenna. Actually the reverse is true. It’s a radio thing. As once on the web, always on the web, we will have to live with the old news in these videos. (con't)
@sTiNkYkIlLeR The fact is, PocketWizard MiniTT1 and FlexTT5 radios do work very well and at distances that are well beyond the TTL metering capabilities of the cameras that use them. Fortunately, the PocketWizard AC3 allows photographers to immediately switch remote FlexTT5 connected flashes to manual control with a flip of a switch for proper flash exposure. That’s with only a MiniTT1 and AC3 on the camera weighing less than 3 ounces. Amazing. (con't)
@sTiNkYkIlLeR Newer Canon flashes are well shielded and work very well. Nikon flash units are also well shielded and work very well at distance. That said, unless one is using a very long lens, the flash illuminated part of the subject read for exposure for a subject more than 100ft from the camera will probably not be well exposed as the camera’s viewfinder TTL flash metering system is not detailed enough to compute accurate auto exposure.
Now, look at the picture at 2.48. The black bar is covering the sky, trees AND girl. Are you trying to tell me that everything in this image - including the sky - is iluminated by flash? No!
The illumination on the sky and trees has nothing to do with the flash, it is ONLY a product of the shutter speed. If the shutter speed is correct to properly illuminate the top of the image (and it is) then it should also illuminate the bottom of the image.
I understand perfectly, but I am not wrong here. When you shoot faster than a 1/250 of a second (if that is your synch speed), a black bar does get in the way - of anything illuminated by the burst from the flash. That means that anything illuminated by the flash will have a black bar, because the flash goes off while the shutter is closing. With me so far?
Out of the box at factory settings I was able to bump up my speedlight sync speeds up to 1/1000 without losing any significant exposure or seeing black bars with my D3. My studio strobe synced at 1/320th.
Interesting fake picture at 2:45. Apparently, without hypersynch, the synch speed is too fast, and you get a black bar - even over the trees in the background. That means that the flash is supposedly illuminating everything - even the trees. Yeah, not likely.
@du1cimer It would appear that you may be confusing HyperSync with High Speed Flash sync. HyperSync is a Special PW Mini and Flex timing function that enables firing the flash sooner than it normally would with Standard Canon manual flash. In normal full-power manual flash, the shutter fully opens and the flash fires. The fastest speed that can be used for this is one where the second shutter curtain has not moved before the flash burst is fully expended.
@pocketwizardvids (continued) Let’s assign a speed of 1/250 for the max sync speed (this is a usual speed with today’s cameras). If a faster shutter speed is used, say 1/320 or 1/400 second, or faster, the second curtain is moving when the first curtain reaches its “full open” position and the flash is commanded to fire. As the second curtain is moving, it covers a part of the imaging sensor and blocks the light from the flash.
(continued) If the ambient light is bright enough, you will see exposure in the picture caused by the ambient light. The dark area at the bottom of the picture is the physical second shutter curtain. As the camera uses faster speeds, 1/500, 1/800, 1/1000sec, the size of the dark area would increase because more and more of the second curtain is in front of the sensor when the flash fires. The flash, by the way, is only illuminating the girl.
(continued) The inverse square law dictates that a good exposure on her would result in illumination so low that by the time it reached the trees there would be virtually nothing left of the flash light for the leaves to reflect.All of that said, PW discovered that if you advance the trigger time of the flash, that is, fire it sooner than it is normally triggered (say before the shutter even starts to move), you can use a faster mechanical speed.
(continued) Many cameras are capable of a faster mechanical sync speed. The Canon 1D series is the best of the full sensors. The Canon 5D/5DMKII has the slowest moving shutter and is the worst in this respect. The APS sensors are usually good for 1/500 and a bit above. They can get away with this because a big flash does not create all of its light in one instant. Power is applied to the flash tube quickly but in the first milliseconds, the light is ramping up to full output.
(continued) The light peaks and then tails down into darkness. The PW timing misses the first part of the light. The shutter picks up the peak and downward.
They also found that it is possible to pass the shutter slit through the peak of the flash if the timing is right. This requires working with the PW software sync timing, your camera and manual, full-power flash.
(continued) As an example, I found that my Canon 7D can get a pretty consistent 1/2000sec with full power manual flash when the sync timing is set for -1900. The simpler the flash system, the bigger the light and the better it works. I have some 35-year-old Vivitar 283s that have gotten out of my closet and gained a new life in my photography.
@du1cimer That's not accurate. The black bar is the shutter in the camera that can't get out the way fast enough, not shadow on the trees. That looks very much like what I get if I try to shoot faster than 1/250 of a second with flash. Try it.
I own them and they still don't work well. They are getting better with firmware updates and are pretty good if you're within 15 feet and using them to fill in bright sun but they over-expose everything in darker situations. (The build quality is awful. I've broken 3 feet in 4 months doing pretty basic stuff. FYI, I've never broken the foot off of anything else.) That said, the ability to high-speed-sync is addictive so I'm still using them. I keep Cactus around for the inevitable PWiz fail.
We have tt1 and flex 5 on a 580 and get less than 10ft range with ETTL. Phoned PW who just said they were aware of the fact the new PW's don't work well with some Canon flash units. They did say we "might" get more range if we put a sock over our flash units.
This appears to be improper operation. Assuming that you are a USA resident, please send them into service for a full diagnostic check. They will fix, tune, upgrade to V5.0 and whatever else might be needed to get you the operation they can achieve which is quite amazing. An AC5 will accompany your FlexTT5 on return. The AC5 is really not necessary for normal use inside about 50ft or more.
This can all be done using a clear understanding of exposure and manual slaves, if you are willing to put the leg work in...the old pocket wizards should work with the Siny
I got my hand on these at the PPO show and I believe they were the Nikon version they were on a nikon sb-900 :). ( could of been a canon one though just stuck on it) Let me just say that i was radio popper right now I would be VERY worried. these are sweet and don't feel wrong in anyway way they felt just right on the sb-900 and the transmitter seemed just the right size.
well, you're paying for reliability. but the biggest weighting on it is the name. since they own that reliability that no one else seems to come close to. they can charge the ridiculous amounts that they do without fear of competition.
@TOMEKWARDZALA yes they are a bit over price. I own a pair...and they are way to expensive. Plus, some of the parts on the system feels like cheap plastic. With the price of the mini and flex they at least should make the switches and mount metal or something more durable. Every time i use them i have to be careful not to secure them on too tightly on the camera and flash, afraid the plastic part might snap.
This is very nice. If you had Nikon versions coming out by end of march I'll buy but if not, your forcing me to go with radio poppers. One thing though Radio poppers have is the ability to high speed sync with any flash and even control power output of Alien Bee and White Lighting.
Only one question... When is the Nikon version coming out??? This is awesome! What the photographic world has been waiting for, seamless, easy RF TTL. THANK YOU POCKETWIZZARD!!!!!
I really want to try this new system. Getting reliable ttl outdoors on a sunny day - without worries about line of sight issues - that would really help me! Sign me up!
PocketWizards aren't copying anyone. It's not like TTL metering is anything new and it's not like anyone couldn't have guessed where the future of wireless triggering was going next.
can you use the ettl with ef580II inside a softbox?
DREBEL187 2 months ago
@DREBEL187 Yes
Mahargbot 5 days ago
if i got a a transmitter i would need a reciever to opertate a flash? right?
geowar09 3 months ago
Jeff Winger from Community?
awakethrucolor 3 months ago
there not the easiest thing to set up. i just got 1 mini and 3 flex today lot of learning to do.
thecrazygardener 3 months ago
He so smug about it. "Even your stupid flash thinks it's on a camera".
lalalaina4life 4 months ago
This guy mad corny
krazykorican 4 months ago
This product has simply pushed my photography into a Fantastic new direction. Amazing system for on location shoots, small and light weight. wayneleetaylorphotography
WLTPHOTOGRAPHY 4 months ago
Can these be used with any other flashes other than Canon/Nikon?
Dtufino 4 months ago
Dude i paid $899 for 1 mini tt1 and 3 flex tt5's, im only 16 and that was all the money i had! I better be making it back with customers! :|
Miscellaneousviidz 6 months ago
@Miscellaneousviidz I believe it's a little bit too much for their products... I rather buy the canon speedlite transmitter myself shoot!
sajor10nemrac 5 months ago
search for Pixel TR-332
Pinnger 6 months ago
cool
techkid1998 6 months ago
Comment removed
manis404 7 months ago
I went to their website because its a fun place to hang out.
KeijinShiho 8 months ago
Not for Canon stobes!!!!!
1TOMDEWITTE 8 months ago
not for Canon strobes!!!!!!!!!!
1TOMDEWITTE 8 months ago
I have the FlexTT5 with Canon Mark IV and Canon Speedlight 480 EG, but I cant make them work togheter. Any suggestions?
MrJorgemana 9 months ago
@MrJorgemana ya buy cowboy studio triggers...
comrade86 8 months ago
@MrJorgemana did you ask pockerdwizard crew?
Pinnger 6 months ago
Now all that would be Great, if it worked... NOT!!!
Firefighter11A 9 months ago
Can i buy a Mini TT1 so i can have the fast shutter speeds on my camera and still use my Plus II's to trigger my flashes?
aiwayamaha 9 months ago
what PW setup would i need for a basic wireless flash system? I have a canon t2i, and a sigma flash... which PW units would i need?
Buhzie15 9 months ago
Even though this is a commercial I still love how it gives enough technical detail instead of being just image selling like 99.9% of modern commercials are.
PsykoOps 9 months ago
Great product line. I like the reliability and construction of the PW over third party wireless controllers. You do get what you pay for. Thing I don't understand is how people use the cheaper "eBay style " triggers on their pro level DSLRs?
I can't wait to try out the Flex and Mini for the Nikon. I've had good results with the Plus IIs in my Canon system in the past.
LEXPIX 10 months ago
Hi!
I'm planning to buy the MiniTT1 and the FlexTT5 so i can use them with 4 studio flashes from the AlienBee company using the AC9 AlienBees Adapter. The questions are: can i control 4 flashes or more? Can i moderate manually the intensity of light that i want in each flash independently? and will the MiniTT1 will take the reading automatically?
Thank You
estebanmorales1982 11 months ago
@estebanmorales1982
I was just at wppi for the last two days here in Las Vegas. I spoke directly with the company regarding these products. They told me that honestly they would buy all flex TT5's rather than buying a MiniTT1. For the 20 bucks difference it makes sense as the TT5 can be both a transmitter and a receiver where the TT1 can only transmit. Yes you can use the flashes in manual mode. The mini TT1 does not read anything, it just transmits data from your camera, which is what reads.
tyleremt1 11 months ago
@tyleremt1 I need to use a meter?
estebanmorales1982 11 months ago
This is the system that I use and I have been fairly happy with it - aside from the issues with RF interference using the 580 line of flashes (which PW addressed by giving out the RF soft-shield at no cost last year), I've been pretty content with the system. Admittedly, I've had it fail to fire a few times and the TT1 seems to eat thru batteries faster than I'd like. I really want to try an AC3 ZoneController... would make my style of portrait shoots much easier. @Tom - the prices are fair.
PhotoMattMuirhead 11 months ago
So If I read correctly, everything is fixed right now for the Canon Flashs. So I'll have no problem with my 580EXII and my two 550 EX. So If I want to be well equiped I need to get 2 mini TT1 and 1 Flex TT5.
pierrec06 1 year ago
What about the 800' Coverage ??
Does someone test for this ?
'Cause I read it's fake, it only cover for 100' Maximum
sTiNkYkIlLeR 1 year ago
@sTiNkYkIlLeR Original bench testing and prototype testing did provide some amazing distances. PocketWizard has had problems with the RF noise generated by some Canon flash units and has spent great time and capitol to contain the problem. The AC5 and AC7 were developed to combat the distance limiting noise and have been quite successful. Please see tests done by Rob Galbraith here: robgalbraithDOTcom/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-10050-10598 (continued)
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
@pocketwizardvids Do you plan to make your products to work in higer Frequencies ?
I watch a video series (8 Videos) from tricoastphoto
And facts talk by itself. RadioPopper work greater than PW. I'm deciding on which brand to select as emerging photographer.
sTiNkYkIlLeR 1 year ago
@sTiNkYkIlLeR Thanks for asking! Selection of the best radio frequency to use for PocketWizard radios was well studied by LPA-PocketWizard when they started designing the PocketWizard system. Larger radio waves, lower numbers, can penetrate walls and work around and under things better than higher frequencies. Extreme example: The US Navy uses ultra low waves that enable talking to submarines on the other side of the world. (con't)
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
@sTiNkYkIlLeR The frequency that is used by PocketWizards has very little competition which is vital to good communication. Other available frequencies such as 900Mhz are now being heavily populated by industry and municipal government communications. And 2.4Ghz is crowded with WiFi, cellphone and many other forms of communication. The major problem that PocketWizard faced with the Canon system was ineffective RF shielding of some of the Canon flashes. (con't)
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
@sTiNkYkIlLeR We have since found ways to shield the noise produced by them. Also, the newer Canon 430EXII is well shielded and works wonderfully well with the Mini and Flex. The new Nikon system PocketWizard radios are just coming to market. Nikon flashes have properly shielded circuitry and we believe that the MiniTT1 and FlexTT5 for Nikon will be greatly appreciated and very popular. (con't)
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
@sTiNkYkIlLeR We are big fans of TriCoast Photography for the excellent education they provide to the photography community. Besides being innovative and fun, they are a great bunch of guys. Unfortunately, the RF shielding was not available for their tests. And holding a radio will not make the body holding it part of the antenna. Actually the reverse is true. It’s a radio thing. As once on the web, always on the web, we will have to live with the old news in these videos. (con't)
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
@sTiNkYkIlLeR The fact is, PocketWizard MiniTT1 and FlexTT5 radios do work very well and at distances that are well beyond the TTL metering capabilities of the cameras that use them. Fortunately, the PocketWizard AC3 allows photographers to immediately switch remote FlexTT5 connected flashes to manual control with a flip of a switch for proper flash exposure. That’s with only a MiniTT1 and AC3 on the camera weighing less than 3 ounces. Amazing. (con't)
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
@sTiNkYkIlLeR I hope you will take the time to check out PocketWizard in person before counting us out.
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
@sTiNkYkIlLeR Newer Canon flashes are well shielded and work very well. Nikon flash units are also well shielded and work very well at distance. That said, unless one is using a very long lens, the flash illuminated part of the subject read for exposure for a subject more than 100ft from the camera will probably not be well exposed as the camera’s viewfinder TTL flash metering system is not detailed enough to compute accurate auto exposure.
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
did he say "potographers" at 2:41?
etaksotekili 1 year ago
I'm still confused on what's the difference of Mini TT1, Flex TT5 and the Plus? If I buy just the Flex TT5 do I need the mini TT1 or/and Plus?
Snakekilla12 1 year ago
@Snakekilla12 no if you bought a plus it wouldnt transmit the TTL signals. You need a TT5 and either another TT5 or a TT1
BobTheBeastFace 1 year ago
David Ziser has a good explanation of this when he talks about cheating the flash synch. I cant post the link here for some reason, but google it.
du1cimer 1 year ago
Now, look at the picture at 2.48. The black bar is covering the sky, trees AND girl. Are you trying to tell me that everything in this image - including the sky - is iluminated by flash? No!
The illumination on the sky and trees has nothing to do with the flash, it is ONLY a product of the shutter speed. If the shutter speed is correct to properly illuminate the top of the image (and it is) then it should also illuminate the bottom of the image.
du1cimer 1 year ago
I understand perfectly, but I am not wrong here. When you shoot faster than a 1/250 of a second (if that is your synch speed), a black bar does get in the way - of anything illuminated by the burst from the flash. That means that anything illuminated by the flash will have a black bar, because the flash goes off while the shutter is closing. With me so far?
du1cimer 1 year ago
@du1cimer
Out of the box at factory settings I was able to bump up my speedlight sync speeds up to 1/1000 without losing any significant exposure or seeing black bars with my D3. My studio strobe synced at 1/320th.
brucehendricks 1 year ago
he annoys me
willjessel 1 year ago
Interesting fake picture at 2:45. Apparently, without hypersynch, the synch speed is too fast, and you get a black bar - even over the trees in the background. That means that the flash is supposedly illuminating everything - even the trees. Yeah, not likely.
du1cimer 1 year ago
@du1cimer It would appear that you may be confusing HyperSync with High Speed Flash sync. HyperSync is a Special PW Mini and Flex timing function that enables firing the flash sooner than it normally would with Standard Canon manual flash. In normal full-power manual flash, the shutter fully opens and the flash fires. The fastest speed that can be used for this is one where the second shutter curtain has not moved before the flash burst is fully expended.
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
@pocketwizardvids (continued) Let’s assign a speed of 1/250 for the max sync speed (this is a usual speed with today’s cameras). If a faster shutter speed is used, say 1/320 or 1/400 second, or faster, the second curtain is moving when the first curtain reaches its “full open” position and the flash is commanded to fire. As the second curtain is moving, it covers a part of the imaging sensor and blocks the light from the flash.
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
(continued) If the ambient light is bright enough, you will see exposure in the picture caused by the ambient light. The dark area at the bottom of the picture is the physical second shutter curtain. As the camera uses faster speeds, 1/500, 1/800, 1/1000sec, the size of the dark area would increase because more and more of the second curtain is in front of the sensor when the flash fires. The flash, by the way, is only illuminating the girl.
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
(continued) The inverse square law dictates that a good exposure on her would result in illumination so low that by the time it reached the trees there would be virtually nothing left of the flash light for the leaves to reflect.All of that said, PW discovered that if you advance the trigger time of the flash, that is, fire it sooner than it is normally triggered (say before the shutter even starts to move), you can use a faster mechanical speed.
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
(continued) Many cameras are capable of a faster mechanical sync speed. The Canon 1D series is the best of the full sensors. The Canon 5D/5DMKII has the slowest moving shutter and is the worst in this respect. The APS sensors are usually good for 1/500 and a bit above. They can get away with this because a big flash does not create all of its light in one instant. Power is applied to the flash tube quickly but in the first milliseconds, the light is ramping up to full output.
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
(continued) The light peaks and then tails down into darkness. The PW timing misses the first part of the light. The shutter picks up the peak and downward.
They also found that it is possible to pass the shutter slit through the peak of the flash if the timing is right. This requires working with the PW software sync timing, your camera and manual, full-power flash.
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
(continued) As an example, I found that my Canon 7D can get a pretty consistent 1/2000sec with full power manual flash when the sync timing is set for -1900. The simpler the flash system, the bigger the light and the better it works. I have some 35-year-old Vivitar 283s that have gotten out of my closet and gained a new life in my photography.
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
@du1cimer That's not accurate. The black bar is the shutter in the camera that can't get out the way fast enough, not shadow on the trees. That looks very much like what I get if I try to shoot faster than 1/250 of a second with flash. Try it.
FloatingOnAZephyr 1 year ago
...and thank you for flying with us. see you soon!
that guy is funny!
tk375 1 year ago
HAHAHAHAHAHA 3:40
supercanadiandude 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
kestrel1973 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE BIGGEST WEB DESIGNING PROMOTION EVER!!! web sites designing starting low as $99...come check it out
HOTBOY1521 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE BIGGEST WEB DESIGNING PROMOTION EVER!!! web sites designing starting low as $99...come check it out
HOTBOY1521 1 year ago
this guy talks like such a boner..
imLams 1 year ago 9
would that work with a sigma ef 500 on a nikon d60?
jgda9rs 1 year ago
I own them and they still don't work well. They are getting better with firmware updates and are pretty good if you're within 15 feet and using them to fill in bright sun but they over-expose everything in darker situations. (The build quality is awful. I've broken 3 feet in 4 months doing pretty basic stuff. FYI, I've never broken the foot off of anything else.) That said, the ability to high-speed-sync is addictive so I'm still using them. I keep Cactus around for the inevitable PWiz fail.
swinginjonny 1 year ago
Nice if it worked.
We have tt1 and flex 5 on a 580 and get less than 10ft range with ETTL. Phoned PW who just said they were aware of the fact the new PW's don't work well with some Canon flash units. They did say we "might" get more range if we put a sock over our flash units.
PANOTONE 1 year ago 2
This appears to be improper operation. Assuming that you are a USA resident, please send them into service for a full diagnostic check. They will fix, tune, upgrade to V5.0 and whatever else might be needed to get you the operation they can achieve which is quite amazing. An AC5 will accompany your FlexTT5 on return. The AC5 is really not necessary for normal use inside about 50ft or more.
pocketwizardvids 1 year ago
@pocketwizardvids do you need a pocket wizard for nikon or is cls good enough ??
Socarbon 1 year ago
@PANOTONE that's why i always order from b&h. they have AWESOME costumer service ;)
NeighborThunder 2 months ago
I'm hoping Yangnuo clones this in their next generation of <$50 radio triggers. They keep getting better and better. It's only a matter off time.
BerkeleyGang 1 year ago
FALSE. It does not work as easy as he says.
michaeldelmonte 2 years ago
He looks baked!!! Canon #1 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mvadinan540 2 years ago
This guy doesn't know anything about what he is saying does he... I feel like i'm watching some testimonial for a weight loss product.
erjohnson227 2 years ago 26
Agree,
but the pocket Wizards are amazing
WoahkOd 2 years ago
oh hell yea man, gonna get mine as soon as they come out with the Nikon variation.
erjohnson227 2 years ago
Too expensive, expecially in Europe... 230 euro at least, that means 330 dollars.
catullorampazzo 2 years ago
Ha ha
akissgr1 2 years ago
I see. And you know him? If not, how could you possibly know this?
in2food 2 years ago
Hopefully this knocks down the price on the regular price on the older ones...
OgCoda 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This actor sucks. Next time get a real guy on who knows what he's talking about and can speak plainly.
sdflksdfkfh 2 years ago
I thought the same thing lol.. it's abvious he learnt the script by heart and knows nothing about what his mouth is spitting out..
jalil0b 2 years ago
there are any for nikon d300 ????
koziat66 2 years ago
They do not have anything for Nikon yet :( According to their website, they're hoping to have something by January 2010!
Lets keep our fingers crossed :)
BluesBoyJonny 2 years ago
This is going in my bag real damn soon, and it's amazing shit, but this dude irks me. I feel like I'm watching a Direct TV commercial. Haha.
NastySlashinBro 2 years ago
Make it also for Pentax!!
rtogog 2 years ago
please make this for sony! please please please please please please
punkdude1668 2 years ago
This can all be done using a clear understanding of exposure and manual slaves, if you are willing to put the leg work in...the old pocket wizards should work with the Siny
timfrench1 2 years ago
this is really good
awesome actor too.
StreetEnglishTV 2 years ago
This is AWESOME!
macrojen84 2 years ago
I can't wait to mount these on my D700 and strobes.
markus1030 2 years ago
Comment removed
SaveRalphsBay 2 years ago
Nikon shooters should consider Radio Poppers, more range and faster sync speeds, IMHO.
Frosty1962 2 years ago
I rather not have to put tape on my flashes and hope the inferred signals match up.
kpierce118 2 years ago 2
genial, ya me quiero comprar uno¡¡¡
barnitube 2 years ago
F-i-n-a-l-l-y the size of the industry leader- Elinchrom
SchweizerStolz 2 years ago
Cool. Give me one :)
perpro2 2 years ago
Make the nikon one already! Please!
kpierce118 2 years ago
I got my hand on these at the PPO show and I believe they were the Nikon version they were on a nikon sb-900 :). ( could of been a canon one though just stuck on it) Let me just say that i was radio popper right now I would be VERY worried. these are sweet and don't feel wrong in anyway way they felt just right on the sb-900 and the transmitter seemed just the right size.
bcmooney101 2 years ago
Do not you think that their products are overpriced ?!
TOMEKWARDZALA 2 years ago 43
@TOMEKWARDZALA pocketwizard prices are bullshit
ichirootaniguchi 11 months ago
@TOMEKWARDZALA
well, you're paying for reliability. but the biggest weighting on it is the name. since they own that reliability that no one else seems to come close to. they can charge the ridiculous amounts that they do without fear of competition.
EddieTLawson 11 months ago
@TOMEKWARDZALA well you can buy long pc cable...
Pinnger 6 months ago
@TOMEKWARDZALA yes they are a bit over price. I own a pair...and they are way to expensive. Plus, some of the parts on the system feels like cheap plastic. With the price of the mini and flex they at least should make the switches and mount metal or something more durable. Every time i use them i have to be careful not to secure them on too tightly on the camera and flash, afraid the plastic part might snap.
yangboi88 4 months ago
So much money we are spending just for a little creativity ehhh?
Looks like a solid product from pocketwizard.
indoful 2 years ago
This is very nice. If you had Nikon versions coming out by end of march I'll buy but if not, your forcing me to go with radio poppers. One thing though Radio poppers have is the ability to high speed sync with any flash and even control power output of Alien Bee and White Lighting.
bcmooney101 2 years ago
Very very expensive :S
l33thustla 2 years ago
Only one question... When is the Nikon version coming out??? This is awesome! What the photographic world has been waiting for, seamless, easy RF TTL. THANK YOU POCKETWIZZARD!!!!!
PeteZ28 2 years ago
I really want to try this new system. Getting reliable ttl outdoors on a sunny day - without worries about line of sight issues - that would really help me! Sign me up!
aperkins0531 2 years ago
Nice video! PW goes apple... =P
Product(s) looks good too!
CaptainBestephar 2 years ago
PocketWizards aren't copying anyone. It's not like TTL metering is anything new and it's not like anyone couldn't have guessed where the future of wireless triggering was going next.
05awwrx 2 years ago
so basically Pocket Wizards are now copying the Radio Poppers? heh heh
54east 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
54east 2 years ago
they are perfect! hope the price won´t be to high!
FDPictures 2 years ago
15% more expensive than the Pocket Wizard Plus 2 - to I hear!
n1ckotene 2 years ago
oh crap xD
FDPictures 2 years ago
Hahaha, wtf, I don't think I would want a wending picture of a bride on the train tracks, weird. Cool system though.
wowcolors 2 years ago
Will I be able to reach 1/500 sync speed or higher using Mini or Flex on CanonSLR and PlusII with Canon580EXII?
And If I have mini as transmiter and flex as reciever, can I rach 1/8000 sync speed using Canon system?
RonaldsSulcs 2 years ago
Thats what the site says.
bobbydurston 2 years ago
wow!!! Nice
dialac1 2 years ago