Ufo's on the Moon? II - Apollo 14 EVA 1

[edfeltch]

@AtticusJackson,the music was in 2001 A Space Odyssey ya dope.

[MrDanshark]

Humans have been fooled for so long... but not any more. Jesus Sananda said: "The truth shall make you free" now.. what do you think he was talknig about? THAT WE ARE PART OF A HUGE COSMIC FAMILY! Open your eyes, believe in yourselfs and in your intuition.

[AtticusJackson]

How can anyone take this seriously with this music playing haha

[al3x68]

the only thing I saw is the NASA lens was dirty, in fact the blue spot from min2.14 to 4.00 is at the same position from the center of camera. and also I cannot imagine an alien in a spot shape. cheers

[TheHotelMoxa]

Please, has anybody debunked this phostos?

Are the blue lights produced by flurescent lamps when the pictures were devolped?

Please if anybody can anybody give us more info on this matter?

[electronicexposure]

Hey can someone help me find a certain video, I can give you a relatively good description. The video depicts two astronauts (on the apollo 14 mission) and behind them there is a light just going spastic with colors, and one of the astronauts says "Lets see, Looks like we've had visitors again" The other replies "yep" and the first one says "hardly worth mentioning" and the other answers "agreed".

If you can help me find this footage I would be very grateful , thanks.

[nekalaar]

they are rods, classified as space phenomenon 2.... check out martyn stubbs

[tab6812]

sack the sounds

[inagod]

those reflections were seen on the dark side,suggesting patches of ice,which we know now exists,making the moon our next stop and first space base,from there,it will be on to Mars.Great times

[snowinowen4]

@inagod Yep 2040 or something like that, hello Mr. Red! And around that time something will go to Europa and dig under the icy surface to have a look if theres anything living in the water below.

[Doppelganger399]

Nothing to see here folks just swamp gas.

;-)

[sikici41]

I think Yarraktır o...

[RGEE305]

penis

[maria4wh]

Nice, maybe thouse are small metiros or ather space garbage which reflects the sun light?

[amontaiyagala]

Which picture (NASA ID) are you talking about ?

[oldkilroy]

Don't beleive this- that's OK. EVA's are performed by Alan Shepard and Edgar Mitchell.

Watch: watch?v=g4t9mnTjXl0

[MrKevMan]

Those arent ufos, its jesus, blessing the moonwalkers.

[dhudson369]

how fake is this guys channel lol all footage is fake lol Photoshop is wicked hey

[Tommyr]

Whoever produced this video is a complete idiot.

[Zhiohe6d89cn]

The blue things = reflexions and artefacts made by the camera. It could explain why they doesn't show in certain angles.

No stars doesn't mean they aren't there. It's about the camera. Even with a normal camera it can be a pain in the ass to "photograph" stars even on earth because the light is so weak that you need to focus on them a longer time than "normal" to get "em stuck" on the film.

BTW; I love conspiracy theories... xD

[amontaiyagala]

Dear Zhiohe6d89cn, thank you for your comment. I believe that "reflexions AND artefacts" is sort of a catch them all argument, suffering from the problem that both arguments exclude each other.

I mean it is very unlikely that optical reflections and artefacts produce exactly the same effect on film. I would exclude the reflection because the anomaly is unrelated to camera / sun angles leaving some sort of artefact... but whats the cause & why does it move between two consecutive shots ?

[dedeurs]

@Zhiohe6d89cn

Notice how all lights have the same vertically stretched aura. It looks very much like a (anamorphic) lens feature. But on one photograph a blue light is floating very close to the moon lander, almost touching the ground. And it's quite small. So it, and all other blue lights, must be some optical illusion. What else could it be? Some alien hovering behind a ridge and teasing the astronauts with a laser pen?

[amontaiyagala]

The stars again... Please inform yourself about "exposure time".

[maria4wh]

stars can't be seen niether from the moon no from the space coz there is no atmosphere to diffuse the light

[bobtegas]

That's exactly what it is 'studio lights/house lights' for exits and stairways etc.

[FullFrontalCrudity]

So you have a basis for comparison for what the sun should look like when shot with a hasselblad in a vacuum on a planetary body with no atmosphere?

The blue reflections are probably caused by a higher energy cosmic radiation particle hitting the film.

[eponymos]

Eumir Deodato after Richard Strauss

[kungopus]

nice music...who made it?

[chemicallyromanced22]

please everyone here take a long hard look at the flag, notice that it is blowing in the wind, please also note, that there is no wind on the moon....DUN DUN DUN, lol these were fake photos taken by NASA

[amontaiyagala]

"DUN DUN DUN, lol these were fake photos taken by NASA" ?

I took "a long hard look at the flag" (and your profile - now I somewhat understand), knowing that there is an upper horizontal pole which holds the flag which is of course not "blowing in the wind".

...at least you know that there is no "wind on the moon..."

[whitehawk38]

no it is not blowing. it is just wavey becuase there is no gas so it is shaped in that way.

[afewgoodclips]

The light falloff on both sides of the landing site and the way the sun looks are both dead giveaways.

The high energy particles might make the blue spots, but more likely the film would have all been cloudy.

They faked these and then shot particles through the film to try to appease the scientists who would certainly ask why the film wasn't effected by the radiation.

[amontaiyagala]

Oh my dear, from your video I expected you to be realistic about the Moon landing itself. Sorry, that was a misunderstanding, my fault. Thanks for your comment.

[afewgoodclips]

Oh dear, why is the landscape dark on both sides of the lander, when the "sun" is so damn bright and the moon isn't small enough to create such a curvature?

You see, I am realistic about this stuff. That means that I don't jump to conclusions on either side of these issues. I think we went to the moon, but show me a fake pic, I don't care who took it, and I'll tell you It's a fake pic.

[julioiswack65]

its called space tardo.

[xperiensfeelxpress]

I'm gonna go with a crappy production job in the hangar where the government staged the landing.  Yep. Retard government couldn't even fake a moon landing properly.

:)

[philkarn]

Another bit of data: the Apollo 14 crew received more radiation than the other missions, 1.15 rads to the skin, for two reasons: the trajectory was closer to the geomagnetic equator, meaning more from the Van Allen belts, and the space background (solar wind?) was higher.

So my money is still on charged particles penetrating several layers of wound film in the magazines. They are *definitely* artifacts as you also see them in front of nearby objects.

[amontaiyagala]

That would just limit the size for the anomaly at the time of the shot.

Take a close look at the original NASA releases and you will see that the bluish streak is associated with a faint dot nearby. Furthermore there are one, two or multple sharp dots or areas of maximum intensity (ionizing energy or exposure).

I don't believe that's in agreement with cosmic rays or particles.

[philkarn]

Actually, I've already decided against the cosmic ray theory for another reason. If they were cosmic rays, I'd expect the streaks to occur in random directions. Instead they're always dots or vertical streaks.

A big clue: the marks are all blue; some of the bigger ones are whitish. The film is an Ektachrome, and the top emulsion layer is blue-sensitive. That suggests scratches or static discharges against the emulsion as the film was wound in the magazine.

Note: lunar humidity is 0.

[philkarn]

These blue artifacts appear on most of this magazine, from orbit and on the surface. Some appear in front of the LM, proving they are artifacts. I strongly suspect high energy charged particles. Some apparently penetrated multiple layers of film, leaving marks on roughly the same region of several consecutive pictures.

[amontaiyagala]

I like the particle idea. The film is kept flat during exposure, but as a coil pre- and post-exposure. A particle might penetrate multiple layers and the location of consecutive hits might vary on different slides, due to the coil. Nevertheless,

the location of the anomaly varies with both x- and y-axis. So I still end up with multiple events.

[DBfHL]

I've got it now! :) Thanks amontaiyagala...

[DBfHL]

That's from sunlight, i think. Because the camera, well, you know :)

[amontaiyagala]

Thanks for your comment, I don't believe lens flare is an appropriate explanation, please see reply to tincan3d.

[DBfHL]

Ok, i'll do it :)... You know. That video is great, but i don't know what it was? Sunlight in camera, or realy some UFO, i hope it was UFO, because i'm interested in all kinds of UFO's :) so thanks for this video preview :) I will se that reply.

[tincan3d]

Lens flares. they're is noway they're releasing what they shot. and it was only on the first landing. Ed Mitchell and Shepard were not on the 11 as is indicated in the title.

Those are just camera lens flares. The music is very discoish why?

[amontaiyagala]

Of course there are some lens flares (1:26 right; 1:34 left; 4:20 right), but these are clearly different from the blue flashes. Furthermore, 5:40, 6:06 and 7:00 were taken from inside the LM with the sun in the back, so there is no way the blue lights can be a lens flares.

Ed & Al were on Apollo 14, but that's exactly the title, maybe you stumbled over part II ?

BTW, I don't care about the faked Apollo 11 voice recording, just taking a look at the Apollo Hasselblad photographs.

[tincan3d]

Well, I think was part of the same video in which they said the flare or object is actually a reflection of a exterior lamp that was hanging at an angle outside the LM. BTW.. cool song. I must have been pretty high to write discosh since I have no idea what it means :/

[dwhitty76]

LOVE THE MUSIC !

[lestatmx]

Some researchers said that they were reflections of "Glass Towers"

[amontaiyagala]

Thanks for the comment. ...it's a rather stupid claim because those "Glass Towers" would be visible throughout and not just on a few photographs only. And what's about outer space... ? I know of an additional image of earth through a polarization filter which shows the same anomaly.

[micheldezanger]

8:18 good view... maybe more activity from nasa then officialy told..

[amontaiyagala]

I must acknowledge NASA to release the unmodified photographs of AS14-66. There was no cover-up for this one at least....

[LunarSightings]

love the blue objects 3 mins. into the presentation!

[matlivo]

one last thing!! watchin a show called 'apollo 11, the untold story'. neil armstrong is not interviewed in this doco, either. um, he never speaks! (flatout refuses..? does he not?) ..'cept that one time.. when he made his methodical and calculated 'statement', statement, ..at the apollo anniversary speech at the whitehouse.. (with clinton clappin' in the background.) ****** i think well appears to be in relation to ..aliens. :( do you not..??

[matlivo]

"Anyway, take a close look at 8:05. That's the LRRR, the worst problem for your apollo hoax claims. And its really up there, planted by the astronauts. No need to discuss wheter they went up.." (big hello there Amon:) luv your work!)

could that not of been placed on the moon by a probe..?

[amontaiyagala]

Yep, in case you want it to become a weird story. The plain facts are that they built the LRRR's, placed them in the spacecrafts, got up there and planted them on the moon, took pictures of them, and started to point laser beams on them... Finally, the footage of descent & ascent match with the locations of LRRR's. Why send up an additional probe when you have astronauts walking around...?

[rleored]

how about spurious light reflections in a lens system?

[amontaiyagala]

Of course that's possible (most of the so called UFO's on the moon are lens flares), but then camera angles don't match. There is simply no correlation between the angle of the light source (sun) and the blue flashes.

[LordBicen]

Damn nice tunes to this. I keep expecting to see Huggy Bear as an astronaut come strolling down a Moon dune lookin for his space ho's.

[amontaiyagala]

Never heard of Huggy Bear but if he fits into a spacesuit, why not?

[irthedon]

Thank you for posting your extremely well done video for us to enjoy. I also appreciate the nice work you did on the very long range zooms where their did not appear to be anything other than the darkness of space in the background.

Nice work with the text and the music topped it all off.

Great job!

I hope one day they will tell us what they really saw up there.

We watched live at Curly's Pool Hall then rode our bikes the rest of the night. It was a very good summer.

Thanks again

ir

[amontaiyagala]

Thanks a lot. I'm getting a little bit jealous because I wasn't alive at that time... Maybe next time...

[gnrwood]

top class video mate nice one.

[amontaiyagala]

Thanks, glad you enjoyed.

[greenmagoos]

Surely that wasn't lighting getting into the Apollo 14 moonset amontaiyagala?

How the hell could the same anamoly turn in the Hassy images and the 16 mm dac film?

This sure is a mystery!

[amontaiyagala]

Hey GM, thanks a lot for the video response. No matter what that bluish lights are really about I was expecting them to be present in video material (They should be as frequent as they appear to be in the photo pan). In the photographs you can notice a white dot associated with the bluish streaks. I'm not convinced that it's optical light cause it may also be some high energy particle/ray hitting the film, but I'm sure it's not daylight behind a curtain. Thanks again, AY.

[matlivo]

No matter what that bluish lights are really about I was expecting them to be present in video material (They should be as frequent as they appear to be in the photo pan).

please explian why :)

(layman;)

[amontaiyagala]

No matter what the origin of the bluish light is about (an illuminating phenomenon apart from the Hasselblad camera entering through the lens system, or a result of cosmic rays hitting the film emulsion directly) they should be recorded on photo and film as both techniques are very much the same.

[LordBicen]

Regardless, i think it warrants further investigation. I dont think they are telling us the whole truth. maybe theres a good reason. good for them? bad for us? i dont know, but you can bet your ass they arent telling us everything.

[wilky923]

Yup I do believe nasa is stupid enough to do that, they are stupid enough to airbrush photographs and expect to get away with no one asking why, so why not. Wake up and smell the coffee you are still being taken for a ride to this very day.

[greenmagoos]

"That blue light looks like daylight getting through a curtain!"

Thats a very interesting comment because just for a very fleeting moment what appears to be the very same blue light anamoly appears in the 16 mm dac film.

[quaheedus]

lol... nice video and nice ending magoo....nice music..much better than that freakin car song on your other vid..every time I hear that song its like an ice pick penetrating my ear drums and entering my brain..

[amontaiyagala]

Although I don't know what "freakin car song" you are talking about I'm glad you enjoyed this one, thanks for the comment.

[quaheedus]

Crap!..I'm sorry... Green magoo sent me the video and I thought it was his..just wasnt paying attention ..sorry..

[earthstarm]

looks like light getting in to me.

[amontaiyagala]

2 nd, see reply to wilky...

[wilky923]

That blue light looks like daylight getting through a curtain!

[amontaiyagala]

Moon hoax believer? Never mind, simply explain why NASA didn't perform a second shot. It's funny that you consider NASA to be so stupid or lazy that you claim to be able to notice their alleged fake.

[MOLIL001]

The footage is good, who is performing the music ?

[amontaiyagala]

Eumir Deodato - Also sprach Zarathustra

watch?v=e_ngjYnlO9E

watch?v=Lb7rTiP6dnE

[MOLIL001]

Thank you for the info !, Again both the video and music were awesome, very well put together !

[Darftjedi]

Man there littering

[amontaiyagala]

yep, no dustbins around...

[trekkerguy]

That audio clip at the end, with Mitchell and Shepard. Is there somewhere to here more of those audio clips of them talking about the UFOs?

[trekkerguy]

Well never mind, I just went to the URL at the end to see what they could have been talking about. But there is some transcripts I have read from different flights talking about UFOs on the Moon...

[amontaiyagala]

That's interesting, do you have more info on that? A lot of Apollo communication transcripts are available from NASA and I guess most "Ufo - talk" will boil down to jokes like the roadrunner...

[matlivo]

..and I guess most "Ufo - talk" will boil down to jokes like the roadrunner..."

so that's your position, hmmmz.

(but it sounds so much more juicy!)

was 'thinkin' that..

mitchell would be likely to remember exactly what scenario THAT particular conversation was refering too. exactly.

yet he does not.

what he does do.. is 'agree' with it the possibility of it being another 'plausable' scenario.

Ps: i see mysteries everywhere;)

(n far too often for my own good)

[amontaiyagala]

I mean that transcripts are open to the public and astronauts are apparently joking around a lot. Therefore, conversation that might relate to UFOs could have other explanations. Nevertheless, there is evidence for different radio channels being used depending on the subject and I simply don't know what was spoken out but never entered a written transcript. Of course the astronauts know what was being said, but...

[straydog02]

That might be blue colored lens flare from artificial lighting on the moon set, or possibly some type of blue colored stage lights .

[amontaiyagala]

Do you noticed the fact that these pictures were taken side by side...? So where is the source of the lens flare? BTW, take a look at 4:50 or 6:25, the anomaly is moving from slide to slide but that appears to be unrelated to the camera movement.

[straydog02]

I believe that these photos were taken on moon sets using artificial lighting which creates that exact same color blue lens flare .

Do you believe the blue light is caused by alien UFO's ?

[amontaiyagala]

How does artificial lighting (although not present on the moon) "creates that exact same color blue lens flare"? Please explain. There is a single light source in these pictures, the sun, and the corresponding lens flares are clearly visible. I can only speculate on the origin of the anomaly and "alien UFO" is far fetched.

[amontaiyagala]

Anyway, take a close look at 8:05. That's the LRRR, the worst problem for your apollo hoax claims. And its really up there, planted by the astronauts. No need to discuss wheter they went up.

[straydog02]

Artificial light sources create the same colored blue lens flare as what is seen in this video clip .

I thought by your title that maybe you believed that UFO's were on the Moon ...

I personally don't believe this footage was taken on the Moon , and that's why I think the lights are possibly either lens flare or reflections of stage lights .

[greenmagoos]

Thank you for uploading.

Enjoyed that very much. Excellent music.

Don't agree with the UFO bit though cos' they ain't on the Moon!

[amontaiyagala]

Thank you. I guess you wanted to say: "I personally don't believe they went up...". That's a different thing.