I would challenge any materialist, any darwinist to claim the Universe did not have a backdrop to become photogenic. Substance in one hand means nothing. It takes a contrast of the equal opposite to Naturalism to advance any theory of Design. And the Design is innately proven to have taken place as the Infinite
Density of Matter expanded into the Defining contradicting element of the Void
that surrounded the Big Bang event. Let
anyone with brains figure it out, God is Designing by contrast
recognition. Paint,as the world of materialism, by itself is useless as is the paint in the jars. The Artist must first find a Void, an empty place, where no matter has ever touched, and so it is a Canvas, that partners with the paint to create anything. Thus to believe paint can evolve a world by itself is artistically blind and ignorant to suggest. God is the Intelligent
Science which demands to disallow the supernatural buffering of the impossible
placed as contrast against the possible,
cannot produce invention. God did not just
place matter by itself and it expanded without a medium to buffer it into expressions of design. With no empty space conceived, a something by itself offers no contrast to itself and thus cannot
become shaped into designs, nor can it
evolve into creativity. it takes a counter argument to establish an issue worth talking about.
Materialists put all their faith into the Chalk and see no obligation to the Void created by the Blackboard, to allow chalk to become creative at all. The Universe as material, had
a need for a blackboard, and it is the Void
that surrounded it. So it expanded onto the mystery of the Void, and was shaped not by materialism, but by the Contrasting
power of substance placed against the
absence of any substance. Thus the chalk has no power in itself, unless God
The same way humans have intimate dreams of God, seem to move into another realm that appears super real, that is the same way God created this world. God thought it all up. Mind over matter, the material world bows to the Voids surrounding, and so Design is out of the mystery of the Voids, where space has never entered at all. The Material World has a secret partner, God.
No, the drawing is an example of how it takes God to use a chalk or paint and not find
power in the paint or chalk, but in the application of either onto a Void used as a
canvas for art or the blackboard. Materialism attempting to account for Creation without the Artist and his Canvas is irrational nonsense. A glass of water can only be seen is empty space allows,
thus no design can water create if poured into the ocean as homogeneously. It take
lol, wow, this diagram was some real psycho-bait! but i adore father ted, thanks for posting it.
MyGwendel 2 days ago
I would challenge any materialist, any darwinist to claim the Universe did not have a backdrop to become photogenic. Substance in one hand means nothing. It takes a contrast of the equal opposite to Naturalism to advance any theory of Design. And the Design is innately proven to have taken place as the Infinite
Density of Matter expanded into the Defining contradicting element of the Void
that surrounded the Big Bang event. Let
anyone with brains figure it out, God is Designing by contrast
CarmineFragione 2 years ago
Have you been studying the diagram like I suggested?
Misterb0z 2 years ago
The Artist cannot create by substance alone
using paints out of a jar, anything of design
recognition. Paint,as the world of materialism, by itself is useless as is the paint in the jars. The Artist must first find a Void, an empty place, where no matter has ever touched, and so it is a Canvas, that partners with the paint to create anything. Thus to believe paint can evolve a world by itself is artistically blind and ignorant to suggest. God is the Intelligent
Artist to paint upon the Void.
CarmineFragione 2 years ago
Science which demands to disallow the supernatural buffering of the impossible
placed as contrast against the possible,
cannot produce invention. God did not just
place matter by itself and it expanded without a medium to buffer it into expressions of design. With no empty space conceived, a something by itself offers no contrast to itself and thus cannot
become shaped into designs, nor can it
evolve into creativity. it takes a counter argument to establish an issue worth talking about.
CarmineFragione 2 years ago
Materialists put all their faith into the Chalk and see no obligation to the Void created by the Blackboard, to allow chalk to become creative at all. The Universe as material, had
a need for a blackboard, and it is the Void
that surrounded it. So it expanded onto the mystery of the Void, and was shaped not by materialism, but by the Contrasting
power of substance placed against the
absence of any substance. Thus the chalk has no power in itself, unless God
writes with it upon a blackboard.
CarmineFragione 2 years ago
The same way humans have intimate dreams of God, seem to move into another realm that appears super real, that is the same way God created this world. God thought it all up. Mind over matter, the material world bows to the Voids surrounding, and so Design is out of the mystery of the Voids, where space has never entered at all. The Material World has a secret partner, God.
CarmineFragione 2 years ago
Thank you for the comment, CarmineFragione.
So, are you suggesting that the diagram is wrong? Or is it only wrong for God?
Misterb0z 2 years ago 3
No, the drawing is an example of how it takes God to use a chalk or paint and not find
power in the paint or chalk, but in the application of either onto a Void used as a
canvas for art or the blackboard. Materialism attempting to account for Creation without the Artist and his Canvas is irrational nonsense. A glass of water can only be seen is empty space allows,
thus no design can water create if poured into the ocean as homogeneously. It take
a nothing to calculate a something, No ?
CarmineFragione 2 years ago
Have you been studying the diagram?
Misterb0z 2 years ago 2